2023-07-17 21:53:10,542 INFO  [main] hbase.HBaseClassTestRule(94): Test class org.apache.hadoop.hbase.master.balancer.TestBalancerDecision timeout: 13 mins
2023-07-17 21:53:10,855 WARN  [Time-limited test] impl.MetricsConfig(128): Cannot locate configuration: tried hadoop-metrics2-hbase.properties,hadoop-metrics2.properties
2023-07-17 21:53:10,967 INFO  [Time-limited test] metrics.MetricRegistriesLoader(60): Loaded MetricRegistries class org.apache.hadoop.hbase.metrics.impl.MetricRegistriesImpl
2023-07-17 21:53:11,034 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1082): slop=0.0, systemTablesOnMaster=false
2023-07-17 21:53:11,041 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(253): Loaded config; maxSteps=1000000, runMaxSteps=false, stepsPerRegion=800, maxRunningTime=30000, isByTable=false, CostFunctions=[RegionCountSkewCostFunction, PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction, MoveCostFunction, RackLocalityCostFunction, TableSkewCostFunction, RegionReplicaHostCostFunction, RegionReplicaRackCostFunction, ReadRequestCostFunction, WriteRequestCostFunction, MemStoreSizeCostFunction, StoreFileCostFunction] , sum of multiplier of cost functions = 0.0 etc.
2023-07-17 21:53:11,055 INFO  [Time-limited test] hbase.ResourceChecker(147): before: master.balancer.TestBalancerDecision#testBalancerDecisions Thread=12, OpenFileDescriptor=263, MaxFileDescriptor=60000, SystemLoadAverage=294, ProcessCount=173, AvailableMemoryMB=7729
2023-07-17 21:53:11,057 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1082): slop=0.0, systemTablesOnMaster=false
2023-07-17 21:53:11,087 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(253): Loaded config; maxSteps=1000000, runMaxSteps=false, stepsPerRegion=800, maxRunningTime=30000, isByTable=false, CostFunctions=[RegionCountSkewCostFunction, PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction, MoveCostFunction, RackLocalityCostFunction, TableSkewCostFunction, RegionReplicaHostCostFunction, RegionReplicaRackCostFunction, ReadRequestCostFunction, WriteRequestCostFunction, MemStoreSizeCostFunction, StoreFileCostFunction] , sum of multiplier of cost functions = 0.0 etc.
2023-07-17 21:53:11,088 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1082): slop=0.0, systemTablesOnMaster=false
2023-07-17 21:53:11,088 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(253): Loaded config; maxSteps=1000000, runMaxSteps=false, stepsPerRegion=800, maxRunningTime=30000, isByTable=true, CostFunctions=[RegionCountSkewCostFunction, PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction, MoveCostFunction, RackLocalityCostFunction, TableSkewCostFunction, RegionReplicaHostCostFunction, RegionReplicaRackCostFunction, ReadRequestCostFunction, WriteRequestCostFunction, MemStoreSizeCostFunction, StoreFileCostFunction] , sum of multiplier of cost functions = 0.0 etc.
2023-07-17 21:53:11,118 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,119 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-17 21:53:11,119 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-17 21:53:11,120 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-17 21:53:11,120 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-17 21:53:11,120 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,120 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,120 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table9
2023-07-17 21:53:11,120 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table8
2023-07-17 21:53:11,120 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-17 21:53:11,121 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-17 21:53:11,121 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv416877346=1, srv36723049=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,139 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,139 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv416877346=1, srv36723049=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,140 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,142 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1229743033=0, srv258261530=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,143 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,143 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1229743033=0, srv258261530=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,144 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,145 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1234546078=0, srv1283398715=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,147 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,147 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1234546078=0, srv1283398715=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,149 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,149 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-17 21:53:11,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv245640399=1, srv1784540978=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,151 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,151 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv245640399=1, srv1784540978=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,163 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,164 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv245640399=1, srv1784540978=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,165 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,166 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-17 21:53:11,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv670112718=1, srv1027348116=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,167 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,167 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-17 21:53:11,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv670112718=1, srv1027348116=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,168 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,168 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv670112718=1, srv1027348116=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,170 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,170 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv670112718=1, srv1027348116=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,171 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,172 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1794453521=0, srv179540455=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,172 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,173 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv323671271=1, srv1257376340=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,173 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,174 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-17 21:53:11,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1320770529=0, srv1831505397=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,175 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,175 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-17 21:53:11,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1320770529=0, srv1831505397=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,176 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,176 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-17 21:53:11,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1320770529=0, srv1831505397=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,177 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,177 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-17 21:53:11,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1320770529=0, srv1831505397=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,178 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,178 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1320770529=0, srv1831505397=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,179 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,179 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1320770529=0, srv1831505397=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,180 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,181 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table9
2023-07-17 21:53:11,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1320770529=0, srv1831505397=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,182 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table9) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,182 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table8
2023-07-17 21:53:11,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1320770529=0, srv1831505397=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,183 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table8) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,183 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-17 21:53:11,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1320770529=0, srv1831505397=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,184 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,185 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-17 21:53:11,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1320770529=0, srv1831505397=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,186 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,352 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1380
2023-07-17 21:53:11,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,354 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1380) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,354 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1381
2023-07-17 21:53:11,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,355 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1381) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,355 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table880
2023-07-17 21:53:11,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,357 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table880) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,357 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1140
2023-07-17 21:53:11,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,358 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1140) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,358 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1382
2023-07-17 21:53:11,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,359 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1382) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,359 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table881
2023-07-17 21:53:11,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,361 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table881) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,361 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1141
2023-07-17 21:53:11,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,362 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1141) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,362 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1383
2023-07-17 21:53:11,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,363 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1383) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,363 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table640
2023-07-17 21:53:11,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,364 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table640) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,365 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table882
2023-07-17 21:53:11,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,365 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table882) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,366 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1142
2023-07-17 21:53:11,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,366 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1142) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,367 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1384
2023-07-17 21:53:11,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,368 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1384) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,368 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table641
2023-07-17 21:53:11,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,369 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table641) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,369 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table883
2023-07-17 21:53:11,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,370 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table883) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,370 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1143
2023-07-17 21:53:11,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,371 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1143) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,371 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1385
2023-07-17 21:53:11,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,372 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1385) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,372 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table400
2023-07-17 21:53:11,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,373 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table400) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,374 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table642
2023-07-17 21:53:11,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,375 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table642) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,375 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table884
2023-07-17 21:53:11,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,376 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table884) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,376 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1144
2023-07-17 21:53:11,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,376 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1144) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,376 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1386
2023-07-17 21:53:11,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,377 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1386) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,377 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table401
2023-07-17 21:53:11,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,378 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table401) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,378 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table643
2023-07-17 21:53:11,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,379 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table643) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,379 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table885
2023-07-17 21:53:11,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,380 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table885) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,380 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1145
2023-07-17 21:53:11,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,396 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1145) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,396 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1387
2023-07-17 21:53:11,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,397 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1387) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,397 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table402
2023-07-17 21:53:11,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,398 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table402) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,398 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table644
2023-07-17 21:53:11,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,398 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table644) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,399 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table886
2023-07-17 21:53:11,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,399 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table886) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,400 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table403
2023-07-17 21:53:11,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,400 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table403) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,401 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table645
2023-07-17 21:53:11,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,401 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table645) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,402 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table887
2023-07-17 21:53:11,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,403 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table887) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,403 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table404
2023-07-17 21:53:11,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,404 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table404) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,404 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table646
2023-07-17 21:53:11,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,405 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table646) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,405 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table888
2023-07-17 21:53:11,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,406 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table888) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,406 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table405
2023-07-17 21:53:11,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,407 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table405) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,407 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table647
2023-07-17 21:53:11,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,408 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table647) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,408 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table889
2023-07-17 21:53:11,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,413 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table889) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,413 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table406
2023-07-17 21:53:11,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,414 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table406) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,414 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table648
2023-07-17 21:53:11,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,415 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table648) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,415 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table407
2023-07-17 21:53:11,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,416 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table407) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,416 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table649
2023-07-17 21:53:11,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,416 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table649) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,416 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table408
2023-07-17 21:53:11,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,417 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table408) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,417 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table409
2023-07-17 21:53:11,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,418 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table409) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,418 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1146
2023-07-17 21:53:11,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,419 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1146) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,419 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1388
2023-07-17 21:53:11,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,420 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1388) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,420 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1147
2023-07-17 21:53:11,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,421 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1147) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,421 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1389
2023-07-17 21:53:11,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,421 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1389) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,421 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1148
2023-07-17 21:53:11,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,422 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1148) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,422 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1149
2023-07-17 21:53:11,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,423 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1149) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,423 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1370
2023-07-17 21:53:11,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,423 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1370) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,424 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1371
2023-07-17 21:53:11,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,424 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1371) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,424 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table870
2023-07-17 21:53:11,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,425 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table870) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,425 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1130
2023-07-17 21:53:11,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,426 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1130) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,426 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1372
2023-07-17 21:53:11,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,426 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1372) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,426 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table871
2023-07-17 21:53:11,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,427 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table871) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,427 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1131
2023-07-17 21:53:11,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,428 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1131) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,428 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1373
2023-07-17 21:53:11,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,429 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1373) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,429 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table630
2023-07-17 21:53:11,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,430 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table630) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,430 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table872
2023-07-17 21:53:11,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,431 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table872) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,431 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1132
2023-07-17 21:53:11,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,432 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1132) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,432 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1374
2023-07-17 21:53:11,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,433 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1374) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,434 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table631
2023-07-17 21:53:11,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,434 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table631) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,435 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table873
2023-07-17 21:53:11,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,435 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table873) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,435 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1133
2023-07-17 21:53:11,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,436 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1133) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,436 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1375
2023-07-17 21:53:11,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,437 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1375) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,437 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table632
2023-07-17 21:53:11,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,438 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table632) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,438 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table874
2023-07-17 21:53:11,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,439 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table874) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,439 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1134
2023-07-17 21:53:11,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,440 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1134) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,440 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1376
2023-07-17 21:53:11,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,441 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1376) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,441 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table633
2023-07-17 21:53:11,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,441 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table633) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,441 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table875
2023-07-17 21:53:11,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,442 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table875) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,442 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table634
2023-07-17 21:53:11,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,442 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table634) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,442 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table876
2023-07-17 21:53:11,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,443 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table876) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,443 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table635
2023-07-17 21:53:11,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,444 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table635) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,444 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table877
2023-07-17 21:53:11,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,445 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table877) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,445 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table636
2023-07-17 21:53:11,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,445 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table636) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,445 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table878
2023-07-17 21:53:11,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,446 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table878) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,446 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table637
2023-07-17 21:53:11,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,446 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table637) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,447 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table879
2023-07-17 21:53:11,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,447 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table879) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,447 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table638
2023-07-17 21:53:11,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,448 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table638) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,448 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table639
2023-07-17 21:53:11,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,449 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table639) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,449 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1135
2023-07-17 21:53:11,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,450 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1135) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,450 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1377
2023-07-17 21:53:11,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,451 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1377) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,451 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1136
2023-07-17 21:53:11,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,452 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1136) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,452 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1378
2023-07-17 21:53:11,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,453 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1378) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,453 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1137
2023-07-17 21:53:11,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,453 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1137) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,453 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1379
2023-07-17 21:53:11,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,454 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1379) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,454 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1138
2023-07-17 21:53:11,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,455 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1138) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,455 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1139
2023-07-17 21:53:11,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,456 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1139) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,456 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table660
2023-07-17 21:53:11,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,456 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table660) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,456 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1360
2023-07-17 21:53:11,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,457 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1360) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,457 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table661
2023-07-17 21:53:11,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,458 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table661) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,458 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1361
2023-07-17 21:53:11,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,458 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1361) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,458 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table420
2023-07-17 21:53:11,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,459 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table420) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,459 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table662
2023-07-17 21:53:11,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,460 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table662) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,460 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1120
2023-07-17 21:53:11,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,461 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1120) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,461 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1362
2023-07-17 21:53:11,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,462 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1362) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,462 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table421
2023-07-17 21:53:11,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,462 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table421) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,462 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table663
2023-07-17 21:53:11,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,463 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table663) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,463 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1121
2023-07-17 21:53:11,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,463 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1121) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,463 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1363
2023-07-17 21:53:11,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,464 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1363) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,464 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table422
2023-07-17 21:53:11,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,465 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table422) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,465 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table664
2023-07-17 21:53:11,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,466 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table664) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,466 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1122
2023-07-17 21:53:11,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,467 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1122) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,467 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1364
2023-07-17 21:53:11,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,468 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1364) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,468 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table423
2023-07-17 21:53:11,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,469 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table423) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,469 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table665
2023-07-17 21:53:11,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,469 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table665) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,470 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1123
2023-07-17 21:53:11,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,470 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1123) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,470 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1365
2023-07-17 21:53:11,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,471 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1365) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,471 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table424
2023-07-17 21:53:11,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,472 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table424) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,472 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table666
2023-07-17 21:53:11,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,472 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table666) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,472 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table425
2023-07-17 21:53:11,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,473 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table425) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,473 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table667
2023-07-17 21:53:11,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,473 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table667) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,473 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table426
2023-07-17 21:53:11,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,474 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table426) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,474 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table668
2023-07-17 21:53:11,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,474 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table668) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,474 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table427
2023-07-17 21:53:11,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,475 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table427) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,475 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table669
2023-07-17 21:53:11,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,475 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table669) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,475 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table428
2023-07-17 21:53:11,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,476 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table428) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,476 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table429
2023-07-17 21:53:11,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,476 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table429) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,476 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1124
2023-07-17 21:53:11,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,477 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1124) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,477 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1366
2023-07-17 21:53:11,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,477 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1366) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,478 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1125
2023-07-17 21:53:11,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,478 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1125) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,479 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1367
2023-07-17 21:53:11,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,479 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1367) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,479 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1126
2023-07-17 21:53:11,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,480 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1126) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,480 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1368
2023-07-17 21:53:11,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,481 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1368) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,481 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1127
2023-07-17 21:53:11,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,482 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1127) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,482 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1369
2023-07-17 21:53:11,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,482 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1369) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,482 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1128
2023-07-17 21:53:11,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,483 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1128) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,483 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1129
2023-07-17 21:53:11,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,484 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1129) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,484 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table890
2023-07-17 21:53:11,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,485 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table890) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,485 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table891
2023-07-17 21:53:11,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,485 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table891) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,485 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table650
2023-07-17 21:53:11,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,486 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table650) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,486 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table892
2023-07-17 21:53:11,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,487 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table892) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,487 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1350
2023-07-17 21:53:11,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,488 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1350) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,488 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table651
2023-07-17 21:53:11,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,488 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table651) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,488 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table893
2023-07-17 21:53:11,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,489 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table893) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,489 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1351
2023-07-17 21:53:11,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,490 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1351) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,490 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table410
2023-07-17 21:53:11,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,491 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table410) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,491 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table652
2023-07-17 21:53:11,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,491 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table652) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,492 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table894
2023-07-17 21:53:11,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,492 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table894) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,492 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1110
2023-07-17 21:53:11,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,493 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1110) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,493 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1352
2023-07-17 21:53:11,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,494 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1352) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,494 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table411
2023-07-17 21:53:11,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,495 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table411) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,495 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table653
2023-07-17 21:53:11,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,496 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table653) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,496 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table895
2023-07-17 21:53:11,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,496 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table895) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,497 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1111
2023-07-17 21:53:11,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,497 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1111) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,497 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1353
2023-07-17 21:53:11,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,498 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1353) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,498 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table412
2023-07-17 21:53:11,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,499 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table412) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,499 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table654
2023-07-17 21:53:11,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,500 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table654) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,500 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table896
2023-07-17 21:53:11,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,501 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table896) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,501 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1112
2023-07-17 21:53:11,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,502 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1112) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,502 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1354
2023-07-17 21:53:11,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,502 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1354) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,502 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table413
2023-07-17 21:53:11,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,503 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table413) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,503 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table655
2023-07-17 21:53:11,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,504 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table655) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,504 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table897
2023-07-17 21:53:11,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,504 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table897) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,504 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table414
2023-07-17 21:53:11,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,505 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table414) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,505 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table656
2023-07-17 21:53:11,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,506 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table656) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,506 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table898
2023-07-17 21:53:11,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,506 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table898) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,506 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table415
2023-07-17 21:53:11,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,507 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table415) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,507 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table657
2023-07-17 21:53:11,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,507 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table657) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,508 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table899
2023-07-17 21:53:11,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,508 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table899) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,508 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table416
2023-07-17 21:53:11,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,509 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table416) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,509 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table658
2023-07-17 21:53:11,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,509 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table658) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,509 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table417
2023-07-17 21:53:11,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,510 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table417) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,510 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table659
2023-07-17 21:53:11,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,511 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table659) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,511 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table418
2023-07-17 21:53:11,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,511 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table418) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,512 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table419
2023-07-17 21:53:11,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,512 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table419) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,512 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1113
2023-07-17 21:53:11,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,513 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1113) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,513 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1355
2023-07-17 21:53:11,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,513 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1355) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,513 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1114
2023-07-17 21:53:11,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,514 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1114) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,514 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1356
2023-07-17 21:53:11,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,515 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1356) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,515 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1115
2023-07-17 21:53:11,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,515 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1115) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,515 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1357
2023-07-17 21:53:11,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,516 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1357) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,516 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1116
2023-07-17 21:53:11,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,516 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1116) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,516 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1358
2023-07-17 21:53:11,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,517 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1358) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,517 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1117
2023-07-17 21:53:11,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,518 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1117) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,518 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1359
2023-07-17 21:53:11,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,518 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1359) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,518 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1118
2023-07-17 21:53:11,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,519 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1118) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,519 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1119
2023-07-17 21:53:11,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,520 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1119) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,520 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1182
2023-07-17 21:53:11,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,520 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1182) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,520 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1183
2023-07-17 21:53:11,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,521 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1183) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,521 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1184
2023-07-17 21:53:11,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,522 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1184) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,522 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1185
2023-07-17 21:53:11,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,522 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1185) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,522 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1186
2023-07-17 21:53:11,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,523 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1186) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,523 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1187
2023-07-17 21:53:11,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,524 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1187) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,524 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table840
2023-07-17 21:53:11,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,525 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table840) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,525 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1188
2023-07-17 21:53:11,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,525 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1188) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,525 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table841
2023-07-17 21:53:11,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,526 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table841) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,526 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1189
2023-07-17 21:53:11,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,527 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1189) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,527 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table600
2023-07-17 21:53:11,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,527 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table600) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,527 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table842
2023-07-17 21:53:11,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,528 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table842) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,528 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table601
2023-07-17 21:53:11,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,529 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table601) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,529 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table843
2023-07-17 21:53:11,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,529 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table843) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,529 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table602
2023-07-17 21:53:11,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,530 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table602) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,530 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table844
2023-07-17 21:53:11,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,531 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table844) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,531 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table603
2023-07-17 21:53:11,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,531 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table603) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,531 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table845
2023-07-17 21:53:11,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,532 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table845) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,532 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table604
2023-07-17 21:53:11,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,533 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table604) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,533 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table846
2023-07-17 21:53:11,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,534 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table846) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,534 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table605
2023-07-17 21:53:11,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,534 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table605) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,534 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table847
2023-07-17 21:53:11,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,535 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table847) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,535 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table606
2023-07-17 21:53:11,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,536 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table606) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,536 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table848
2023-07-17 21:53:11,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,537 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table848) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,537 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1180
2023-07-17 21:53:11,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,538 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1180) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,538 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table607
2023-07-17 21:53:11,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,538 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table607) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,539 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table849
2023-07-17 21:53:11,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,539 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table849) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,539 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1181
2023-07-17 21:53:11,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,540 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1181) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,540 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table608
2023-07-17 21:53:11,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,540 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table608) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,541 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table609
2023-07-17 21:53:11,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,541 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table609) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,541 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1171
2023-07-17 21:53:11,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,542 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1171) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,542 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1172
2023-07-17 21:53:11,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,542 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1172) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,542 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1173
2023-07-17 21:53:11,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,543 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1173) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,543 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1174
2023-07-17 21:53:11,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,544 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1174) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,544 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1175
2023-07-17 21:53:11,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,544 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1175) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,545 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1176
2023-07-17 21:53:11,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,545 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1176) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,545 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1177
2023-07-17 21:53:11,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,546 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1177) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,546 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table830
2023-07-17 21:53:11,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,546 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table830) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,547 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1178
2023-07-17 21:53:11,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,547 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1178) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,547 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table831
2023-07-17 21:53:11,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,548 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table831) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,548 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table832
2023-07-17 21:53:11,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,548 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table832) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,548 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table833
2023-07-17 21:53:11,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,549 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table833) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,549 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table834
2023-07-17 21:53:11,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,550 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table834) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,550 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table835
2023-07-17 21:53:11,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,550 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table835) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,550 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table836
2023-07-17 21:53:11,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,551 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table836) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,551 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table837
2023-07-17 21:53:11,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,552 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table837) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,552 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table838
2023-07-17 21:53:11,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,552 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table838) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,552 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1170
2023-07-17 21:53:11,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,558 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1170) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,558 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table839
2023-07-17 21:53:11,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,559 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table839) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,559 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1179
2023-07-17 21:53:11,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,559 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1179) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,559 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1160
2023-07-17 21:53:11,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,560 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1160) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,560 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1161
2023-07-17 21:53:11,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,561 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1161) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,561 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1162
2023-07-17 21:53:11,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,562 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1162) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,562 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1163
2023-07-17 21:53:11,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,563 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1163) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,563 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table860
2023-07-17 21:53:11,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,563 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table860) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,563 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1164
2023-07-17 21:53:11,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,564 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1164) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,564 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table861
2023-07-17 21:53:11,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,565 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table861) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,565 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1165
2023-07-17 21:53:11,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,566 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1165) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,566 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table620
2023-07-17 21:53:11,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,566 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table620) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,566 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table862
2023-07-17 21:53:11,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,566 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table862) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,567 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1166
2023-07-17 21:53:11,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,567 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1166) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,567 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table621
2023-07-17 21:53:11,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,567 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table621) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,568 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table863
2023-07-17 21:53:11,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,568 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table863) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,568 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1167
2023-07-17 21:53:11,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,569 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1167) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,569 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table622
2023-07-17 21:53:11,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,569 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table622) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,569 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table864
2023-07-17 21:53:11,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,570 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table864) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,570 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table623
2023-07-17 21:53:11,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,571 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table623) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,571 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table865
2023-07-17 21:53:11,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,571 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table865) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,572 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table624
2023-07-17 21:53:11,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,572 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table624) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,572 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table866
2023-07-17 21:53:11,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,572 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table866) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,572 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table625
2023-07-17 21:53:11,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,573 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table625) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,573 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table867
2023-07-17 21:53:11,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,573 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table867) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,573 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table626
2023-07-17 21:53:11,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,574 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table626) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,574 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table868
2023-07-17 21:53:11,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,574 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table868) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,574 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table627
2023-07-17 21:53:11,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,575 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table627) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,575 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table869
2023-07-17 21:53:11,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,576 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table869) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,576 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table628
2023-07-17 21:53:11,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,576 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table628) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,577 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table629
2023-07-17 21:53:11,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,577 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table629) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,577 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1168
2023-07-17 21:53:11,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,578 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1168) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,578 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1169
2023-07-17 21:53:11,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,579 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1169) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,579 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1391
2023-07-17 21:53:11,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,579 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1391) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,580 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1150
2023-07-17 21:53:11,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,580 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1150) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,580 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1392
2023-07-17 21:53:11,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,581 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1392) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,581 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1151
2023-07-17 21:53:11,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,582 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1151) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,582 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1393
2023-07-17 21:53:11,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,582 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1393) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,582 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1152
2023-07-17 21:53:11,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,583 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1152) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,583 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1394
2023-07-17 21:53:11,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,583 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1394) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,583 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1153
2023-07-17 21:53:11,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,584 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1153) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,584 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1395
2023-07-17 21:53:11,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,584 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1395) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,584 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table850
2023-07-17 21:53:11,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,585 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table850) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,585 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1154
2023-07-17 21:53:11,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,585 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1154) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,585 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1396
2023-07-17 21:53:11,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,586 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1396) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,586 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table851
2023-07-17 21:53:11,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,587 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table851) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,587 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1155
2023-07-17 21:53:11,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,587 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1155) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,587 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1397
2023-07-17 21:53:11,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,588 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1397) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,588 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table610
2023-07-17 21:53:11,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,588 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table610) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,588 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table852
2023-07-17 21:53:11,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,589 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table852) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,589 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1156
2023-07-17 21:53:11,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,589 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1156) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,590 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1398
2023-07-17 21:53:11,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,590 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1398) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,590 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table611
2023-07-17 21:53:11,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,590 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table611) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,590 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table853
2023-07-17 21:53:11,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,591 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table853) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,591 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table612
2023-07-17 21:53:11,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,591 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table612) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,591 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table854
2023-07-17 21:53:11,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,591 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table854) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,592 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table613
2023-07-17 21:53:11,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,592 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table613) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,592 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table855
2023-07-17 21:53:11,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,592 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table855) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,592 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table614
2023-07-17 21:53:11,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,592 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table614) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,593 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table856
2023-07-17 21:53:11,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,593 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table856) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,593 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table615
2023-07-17 21:53:11,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,593 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table615) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,593 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table857
2023-07-17 21:53:11,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,593 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table857) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,594 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table616
2023-07-17 21:53:11,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,594 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table616) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,594 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table858
2023-07-17 21:53:11,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,594 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table858) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,594 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table617
2023-07-17 21:53:11,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,594 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table617) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,595 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table859
2023-07-17 21:53:11,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,595 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table859) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,595 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table618
2023-07-17 21:53:11,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,595 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table618) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,595 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1390
2023-07-17 21:53:11,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,596 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1390) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,596 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table619
2023-07-17 21:53:11,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,596 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table619) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,596 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1157
2023-07-17 21:53:11,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,596 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1157) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,596 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1399
2023-07-17 21:53:11,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,597 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1399) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,597 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1158
2023-07-17 21:53:11,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,597 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1158) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,597 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1159
2023-07-17 21:53:11,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,598 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1159) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,598 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table240
2023-07-17 21:53:11,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,598 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table240) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,598 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table482
2023-07-17 21:53:11,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,599 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table482) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,599 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table241
2023-07-17 21:53:11,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,599 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table241) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,600 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table483
2023-07-17 21:53:11,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,600 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table483) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,600 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table242
2023-07-17 21:53:11,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,601 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table242) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,601 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table484
2023-07-17 21:53:11,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,601 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table484) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,601 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table243
2023-07-17 21:53:11,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,601 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table243) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,602 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table485
2023-07-17 21:53:11,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,602 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table485) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,603 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table244
2023-07-17 21:53:11,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,603 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table244) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,603 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table486
2023-07-17 21:53:11,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,604 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table486) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,604 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table245
2023-07-17 21:53:11,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,604 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table245) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,604 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table487
2023-07-17 21:53:11,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,604 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table487) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,605 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table246
2023-07-17 21:53:11,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,605 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table246) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,605 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table488
2023-07-17 21:53:11,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,605 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table488) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,605 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table247
2023-07-17 21:53:11,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,606 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table247) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,606 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table489
2023-07-17 21:53:11,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,606 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table489) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,607 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table248
2023-07-17 21:53:11,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,607 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table248) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,607 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table249
2023-07-17 21:53:11,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,608 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table249) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,608 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1308
2023-07-17 21:53:11,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,609 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1308) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,609 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1309
2023-07-17 21:53:11,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,609 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1309) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,609 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1300
2023-07-17 21:53:11,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,610 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1300) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,610 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1301
2023-07-17 21:53:11,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,611 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1301) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,611 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1302
2023-07-17 21:53:11,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,611 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1302) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,612 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1303
2023-07-17 21:53:11,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,612 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1303) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,612 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1304
2023-07-17 21:53:11,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,613 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1304) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,613 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table490
2023-07-17 21:53:11,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,613 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table490) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,614 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1305
2023-07-17 21:53:11,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,614 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1305) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,614 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table491
2023-07-17 21:53:11,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,615 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table491) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,615 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1306
2023-07-17 21:53:11,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,615 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1306) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,616 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table250
2023-07-17 21:53:11,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,616 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table250) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,616 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table492
2023-07-17 21:53:11,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,617 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table492) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,617 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1307
2023-07-17 21:53:11,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,617 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1307) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,617 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table471
2023-07-17 21:53:11,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,618 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table471) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,618 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table230
2023-07-17 21:53:11,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,618 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table230) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,618 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table472
2023-07-17 21:53:11,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,619 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table472) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,619 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table231
2023-07-17 21:53:11,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,619 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table231) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,619 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table473
2023-07-17 21:53:11,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,620 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table473) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,620 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table232
2023-07-17 21:53:11,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,622 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table232) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,622 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table474
2023-07-17 21:53:11,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,623 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table474) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,623 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table233
2023-07-17 21:53:11,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,623 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table233) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,623 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table475
2023-07-17 21:53:11,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,624 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table475) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,624 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table234
2023-07-17 21:53:11,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,624 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table234) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,624 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table476
2023-07-17 21:53:11,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,624 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table476) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,624 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table235
2023-07-17 21:53:11,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,625 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table235) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,625 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table477
2023-07-17 21:53:11,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,626 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table477) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,626 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table236
2023-07-17 21:53:11,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,626 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table236) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,626 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table478
2023-07-17 21:53:11,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,627 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table478) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,627 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table237
2023-07-17 21:53:11,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,627 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table237) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,627 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table479
2023-07-17 21:53:11,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,628 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table479) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,628 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table238
2023-07-17 21:53:11,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,628 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table238) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,629 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table239
2023-07-17 21:53:11,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,629 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table239) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,629 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table480
2023-07-17 21:53:11,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,630 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table480) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,630 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table481
2023-07-17 21:53:11,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,630 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table481) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,630 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table262
2023-07-17 21:53:11,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,631 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table262) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,631 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table263
2023-07-17 21:53:11,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,631 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table263) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,631 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table264
2023-07-17 21:53:11,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,632 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table264) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,632 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table265
2023-07-17 21:53:11,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,633 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table265) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,633 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table266
2023-07-17 21:53:11,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,633 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table266) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,635 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table267
2023-07-17 21:53:11,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,636 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table267) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,636 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table268
2023-07-17 21:53:11,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,637 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table268) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,637 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table269
2023-07-17 21:53:11,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,637 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table269) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,637 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table270
2023-07-17 21:53:11,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,638 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table270) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,638 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table271
2023-07-17 21:53:11,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,638 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table271) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,638 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table272
2023-07-17 21:53:11,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,639 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table272) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,639 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table251
2023-07-17 21:53:11,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,639 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table251) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,639 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table493
2023-07-17 21:53:11,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,640 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table493) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,640 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table252
2023-07-17 21:53:11,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,641 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table252) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,641 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table494
2023-07-17 21:53:11,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,641 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table494) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,641 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table253
2023-07-17 21:53:11,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,642 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table253) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,642 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table495
2023-07-17 21:53:11,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,643 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table495) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,643 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table254
2023-07-17 21:53:11,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,643 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table254) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,643 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table496
2023-07-17 21:53:11,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,644 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table496) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,644 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table255
2023-07-17 21:53:11,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,644 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table255) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,645 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table497
2023-07-17 21:53:11,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,645 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table497) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,645 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table256
2023-07-17 21:53:11,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,646 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table256) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,646 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table498
2023-07-17 21:53:11,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,646 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table498) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,646 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table257
2023-07-17 21:53:11,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,647 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table257) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,647 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table499
2023-07-17 21:53:11,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,647 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table499) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,647 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table258
2023-07-17 21:53:11,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,650 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table258) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,650 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table259
2023-07-17 21:53:11,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,650 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table259) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,650 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table260
2023-07-17 21:53:11,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,651 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table260) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,651 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table261
2023-07-17 21:53:11,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,651 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table261) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,651 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table680
2023-07-17 21:53:11,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,652 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table680) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,652 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table681
2023-07-17 21:53:11,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,652 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table681) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,652 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table440
2023-07-17 21:53:11,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,653 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table440) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,653 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table682
2023-07-17 21:53:11,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,653 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table682) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,653 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table441
2023-07-17 21:53:11,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,654 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table441) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,654 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table683
2023-07-17 21:53:11,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,654 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table683) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,654 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table200
2023-07-17 21:53:11,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,655 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table200) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,655 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table442
2023-07-17 21:53:11,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,655 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table442) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,655 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table684
2023-07-17 21:53:11,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,656 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table684) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,656 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1340
2023-07-17 21:53:11,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,656 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1340) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,656 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table201
2023-07-17 21:53:11,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,657 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table201) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,657 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table443
2023-07-17 21:53:11,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,657 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table443) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,657 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table685
2023-07-17 21:53:11,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,658 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table685) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,658 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1341
2023-07-17 21:53:11,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,658 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1341) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,658 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table202
2023-07-17 21:53:11,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,658 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table202) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,659 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table444
2023-07-17 21:53:11,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,659 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table444) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,659 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table686
2023-07-17 21:53:11,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,659 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table686) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,660 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1100
2023-07-17 21:53:11,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,660 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1100) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,660 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1342
2023-07-17 21:53:11,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,661 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1342) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,661 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table203
2023-07-17 21:53:11,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,661 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table203) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,661 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table445
2023-07-17 21:53:11,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,662 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table445) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,662 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table687
2023-07-17 21:53:11,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,662 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table687) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,662 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1101
2023-07-17 21:53:11,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,663 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1101) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,663 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1343
2023-07-17 21:53:11,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,663 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1343) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,663 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table204
2023-07-17 21:53:11,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,663 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table204) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,664 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table446
2023-07-17 21:53:11,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,664 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table446) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,664 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table688
2023-07-17 21:53:11,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,664 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table688) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,664 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table205
2023-07-17 21:53:11,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,665 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table205) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,665 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table447
2023-07-17 21:53:11,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,665 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table447) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,665 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table689
2023-07-17 21:53:11,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,666 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table689) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,666 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table206
2023-07-17 21:53:11,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,666 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table206) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,666 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table448
2023-07-17 21:53:11,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,667 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table448) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,667 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table207
2023-07-17 21:53:11,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,667 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table207) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,667 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table449
2023-07-17 21:53:11,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,667 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table449) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,668 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table208
2023-07-17 21:53:11,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,668 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table208) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,668 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table209
2023-07-17 21:53:11,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,668 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table209) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,669 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1102
2023-07-17 21:53:11,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,669 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1102) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,669 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1344
2023-07-17 21:53:11,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,669 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1344) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,669 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1103
2023-07-17 21:53:11,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,670 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1103) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,670 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1345
2023-07-17 21:53:11,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,670 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1345) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,670 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1104
2023-07-17 21:53:11,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,671 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1104) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,671 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1346
2023-07-17 21:53:11,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,671 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1346) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,671 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1105
2023-07-17 21:53:11,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,672 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1105) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,672 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1347
2023-07-17 21:53:11,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,672 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1347) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,672 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1106
2023-07-17 21:53:11,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,672 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1106) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,672 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1348
2023-07-17 21:53:11,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,673 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1348) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,673 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1107
2023-07-17 21:53:11,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,673 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1107) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,673 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1349
2023-07-17 21:53:11,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,674 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1349) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,674 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1108
2023-07-17 21:53:11,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,674 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1108) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,674 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table690
2023-07-17 21:53:11,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,675 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table690) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,675 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1109
2023-07-17 21:53:11,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,675 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1109) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,675 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table670
2023-07-17 21:53:11,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,676 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table670) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,676 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table671
2023-07-17 21:53:11,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,676 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table671) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,676 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table430
2023-07-17 21:53:11,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,677 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table430) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,677 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table672
2023-07-17 21:53:11,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,677 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table672) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,677 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table431
2023-07-17 21:53:11,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,677 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table431) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,678 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table673
2023-07-17 21:53:11,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,678 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table673) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,678 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table432
2023-07-17 21:53:11,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,678 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table432) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,678 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table674
2023-07-17 21:53:11,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,679 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table674) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,679 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1330
2023-07-17 21:53:11,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,679 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1330) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,679 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table433
2023-07-17 21:53:11,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,680 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table433) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,680 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table675
2023-07-17 21:53:11,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,680 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table675) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,680 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1331
2023-07-17 21:53:11,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,681 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1331) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,681 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table434
2023-07-17 21:53:11,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,681 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table434) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,681 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table676
2023-07-17 21:53:11,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,681 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table676) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,682 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1332
2023-07-17 21:53:11,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,682 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1332) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,682 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table435
2023-07-17 21:53:11,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,682 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table435) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,682 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table677
2023-07-17 21:53:11,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,683 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table677) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,683 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table436
2023-07-17 21:53:11,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,683 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table436) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,683 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table678
2023-07-17 21:53:11,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,684 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table678) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,684 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table437
2023-07-17 21:53:11,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,684 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table437) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,684 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table679
2023-07-17 21:53:11,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,685 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table679) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,685 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table438
2023-07-17 21:53:11,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,685 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table438) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,685 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table439
2023-07-17 21:53:11,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,686 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table439) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,686 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1333
2023-07-17 21:53:11,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,686 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1333) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,686 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1334
2023-07-17 21:53:11,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,686 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1334) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,686 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1335
2023-07-17 21:53:11,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,687 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1335) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,687 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1336
2023-07-17 21:53:11,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,687 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1336) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,687 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1337
2023-07-17 21:53:11,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,688 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1337) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,688 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1338
2023-07-17 21:53:11,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,688 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1338) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,688 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1339
2023-07-17 21:53:11,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,689 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1339) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,689 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table460
2023-07-17 21:53:11,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,689 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table460) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,689 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table461
2023-07-17 21:53:11,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,690 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table461) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,690 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table220
2023-07-17 21:53:11,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,690 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table220) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,690 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table462
2023-07-17 21:53:11,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,691 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table462) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,691 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table221
2023-07-17 21:53:11,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,691 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table221) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,691 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table463
2023-07-17 21:53:11,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,692 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table463) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,692 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table222
2023-07-17 21:53:11,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,692 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table222) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,692 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table464
2023-07-17 21:53:11,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,693 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table464) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,693 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table223
2023-07-17 21:53:11,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,693 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table223) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,693 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table465
2023-07-17 21:53:11,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,693 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table465) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,693 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table224
2023-07-17 21:53:11,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,694 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table224) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,694 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table466
2023-07-17 21:53:11,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,694 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table466) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,694 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1320
2023-07-17 21:53:11,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,695 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1320) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,695 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table225
2023-07-17 21:53:11,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,695 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table225) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,695 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table467
2023-07-17 21:53:11,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,696 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table467) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,696 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1321
2023-07-17 21:53:11,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,696 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1321) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,696 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table226
2023-07-17 21:53:11,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,696 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table226) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,697 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table468
2023-07-17 21:53:11,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,697 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table468) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,697 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table227
2023-07-17 21:53:11,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,697 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table227) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,697 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table469
2023-07-17 21:53:11,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,698 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table469) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,698 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table228
2023-07-17 21:53:11,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,698 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table228) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,698 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table229
2023-07-17 21:53:11,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,699 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table229) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,699 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1322
2023-07-17 21:53:11,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,699 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1322) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,699 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1323
2023-07-17 21:53:11,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,700 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1323) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,700 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1324
2023-07-17 21:53:11,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,700 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1324) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,700 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1325
2023-07-17 21:53:11,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,701 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1325) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,701 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1326
2023-07-17 21:53:11,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,701 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1326) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,701 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1327
2023-07-17 21:53:11,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,701 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1327) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,702 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1328
2023-07-17 21:53:11,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,702 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1328) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,702 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table470
2023-07-17 21:53:11,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,703 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table470) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,703 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1329
2023-07-17 21:53:11,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,703 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1329) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,703 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table691
2023-07-17 21:53:11,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,703 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table691) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,703 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table450
2023-07-17 21:53:11,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,704 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table450) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,704 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table692
2023-07-17 21:53:11,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,704 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table692) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,704 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table451
2023-07-17 21:53:11,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,705 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table451) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,705 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table693
2023-07-17 21:53:11,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,705 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table693) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,705 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table210
2023-07-17 21:53:11,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,705 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table210) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,706 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table452
2023-07-17 21:53:11,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,706 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table452) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,706 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table694
2023-07-17 21:53:11,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,706 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table694) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,706 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table211
2023-07-17 21:53:11,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,707 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table211) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,707 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table453
2023-07-17 21:53:11,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,707 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table453) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,707 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table695
2023-07-17 21:53:11,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,708 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table695) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,708 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table212
2023-07-17 21:53:11,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,708 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table212) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,708 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table454
2023-07-17 21:53:11,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,708 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table454) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,708 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table696
2023-07-17 21:53:11,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,709 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table696) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,709 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table213
2023-07-17 21:53:11,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,709 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table213) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,709 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table455
2023-07-17 21:53:11,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,710 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table455) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,710 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table697
2023-07-17 21:53:11,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,710 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table697) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,710 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table214
2023-07-17 21:53:11,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,710 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table214) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,711 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table456
2023-07-17 21:53:11,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,711 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table456) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,711 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table698
2023-07-17 21:53:11,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,712 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table698) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,712 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1310
2023-07-17 21:53:11,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,712 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1310) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,712 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table215
2023-07-17 21:53:11,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,712 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table215) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,712 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table457
2023-07-17 21:53:11,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,713 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table457) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,713 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table699
2023-07-17 21:53:11,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,713 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table699) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,713 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table216
2023-07-17 21:53:11,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,714 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table216) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,714 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table458
2023-07-17 21:53:11,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,714 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table458) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,714 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table217
2023-07-17 21:53:11,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,715 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table217) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,715 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table459
2023-07-17 21:53:11,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,715 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table459) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,716 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table218
2023-07-17 21:53:11,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,716 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table218) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,716 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table219
2023-07-17 21:53:11,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,716 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table219) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,717 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1319
2023-07-17 21:53:11,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,717 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1319) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,717 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1311
2023-07-17 21:53:11,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,718 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1311) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,718 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1312
2023-07-17 21:53:11,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,718 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1312) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,718 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1313
2023-07-17 21:53:11,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,719 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1313) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,719 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1314
2023-07-17 21:53:11,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,719 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1314) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,719 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1315
2023-07-17 21:53:11,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,720 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1315) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,720 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1316
2023-07-17 21:53:11,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,720 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1316) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,720 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1317
2023-07-17 21:53:11,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,721 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1317) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,721 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1318
2023-07-17 21:53:11,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,721 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1318) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,721 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table196
2023-07-17 21:53:11,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,722 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table196) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,722 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table197
2023-07-17 21:53:11,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,722 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table197) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,722 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table198
2023-07-17 21:53:11,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,723 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table198) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,723 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table199
2023-07-17 21:53:11,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,723 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table199) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,723 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table163
2023-07-17 21:53:11,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,724 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table163) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,724 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table164
2023-07-17 21:53:11,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,724 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table164) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,724 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table165
2023-07-17 21:53:11,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,725 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table165) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,725 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table166
2023-07-17 21:53:11,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,725 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table166) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,725 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table167
2023-07-17 21:53:11,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,726 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table167) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,726 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table168
2023-07-17 21:53:11,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,726 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table168) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,727 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table169
2023-07-17 21:53:11,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,727 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table169) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,727 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table170
2023-07-17 21:53:11,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,728 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table170) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,728 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table171
2023-07-17 21:53:11,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,728 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table171) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,728 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table172
2023-07-17 21:53:11,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,729 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table172) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,729 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table173
2023-07-17 21:53:11,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,729 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table173) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,729 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table152
2023-07-17 21:53:11,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,730 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table152) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,730 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table394
2023-07-17 21:53:11,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,730 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table394) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,730 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table153
2023-07-17 21:53:11,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,731 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table153) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,731 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table395
2023-07-17 21:53:11,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,731 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table395) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,731 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table154
2023-07-17 21:53:11,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,732 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table154) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,732 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table396
2023-07-17 21:53:11,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,732 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table396) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,733 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table155
2023-07-17 21:53:11,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,733 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table155) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,733 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table397
2023-07-17 21:53:11,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,734 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table397) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,734 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table156
2023-07-17 21:53:11,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,735 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table156) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,735 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table398
2023-07-17 21:53:11,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,735 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table398) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,735 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table157
2023-07-17 21:53:11,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,736 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table157) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,736 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table399
2023-07-17 21:53:11,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,736 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table399) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,736 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table158
2023-07-17 21:53:11,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,737 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table158) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,737 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table159
2023-07-17 21:53:11,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,737 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table159) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,737 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table160
2023-07-17 21:53:11,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,738 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table160) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,738 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table161
2023-07-17 21:53:11,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,738 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table161) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,738 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table162
2023-07-17 21:53:11,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,739 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table162) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,739 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table185
2023-07-17 21:53:11,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,739 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table185) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,739 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table186
2023-07-17 21:53:11,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,740 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table186) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,740 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table187
2023-07-17 21:53:11,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,740 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table187) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,740 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table188
2023-07-17 21:53:11,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,741 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table188) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,741 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table189
2023-07-17 21:53:11,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,741 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table189) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,742 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table190
2023-07-17 21:53:11,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,742 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table190) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,742 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table191
2023-07-17 21:53:11,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,742 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table191) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,743 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table192
2023-07-17 21:53:11,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,743 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table192) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,743 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table193
2023-07-17 21:53:11,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,743 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table193) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,744 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table194
2023-07-17 21:53:11,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,744 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table194) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,744 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table195
2023-07-17 21:53:11,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,744 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table195) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,745 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table174
2023-07-17 21:53:11,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,745 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table174) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,745 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table175
2023-07-17 21:53:11,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,745 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table175) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,746 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table176
2023-07-17 21:53:11,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,746 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table176) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,746 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table177
2023-07-17 21:53:11,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,746 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table177) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,747 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table178
2023-07-17 21:53:11,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,747 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table178) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,747 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table179
2023-07-17 21:53:11,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,748 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table179) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,748 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table180
2023-07-17 21:53:11,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,748 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table180) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,748 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table181
2023-07-17 21:53:11,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,749 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table181) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,749 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table182
2023-07-17 21:53:11,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,749 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table182) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,750 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table183
2023-07-17 21:53:11,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,750 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table183) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,750 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table184
2023-07-17 21:53:11,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,751 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table184) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,751 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table800
2023-07-17 21:53:11,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,751 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table800) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,751 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table801
2023-07-17 21:53:11,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,752 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table801) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,752 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table802
2023-07-17 21:53:11,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,752 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table802) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,752 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table803
2023-07-17 21:53:11,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,752 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table803) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,753 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table804
2023-07-17 21:53:11,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,753 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table804) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,753 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table805
2023-07-17 21:53:11,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,753 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table805) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,753 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table806
2023-07-17 21:53:11,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,754 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table806) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,754 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table807
2023-07-17 21:53:11,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,755 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table807) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,755 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table808
2023-07-17 21:53:11,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,755 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table808) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,755 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table809
2023-07-17 21:53:11,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,756 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table809) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,756 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table820
2023-07-17 21:53:11,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,756 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table820) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,756 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table821
2023-07-17 21:53:11,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,757 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table821) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,757 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table822
2023-07-17 21:53:11,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,757 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table822) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,757 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table823
2023-07-17 21:53:11,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,758 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table823) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,758 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table824
2023-07-17 21:53:11,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,758 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table824) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,758 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table825
2023-07-17 21:53:11,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,759 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table825) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,759 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table826
2023-07-17 21:53:11,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,759 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table826) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,759 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table827
2023-07-17 21:53:11,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,760 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table827) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,760 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table828
2023-07-17 21:53:11,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,760 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table828) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,760 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table829
2023-07-17 21:53:11,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,761 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table829) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,761 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1193
2023-07-17 21:53:11,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,761 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1193) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,761 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1194
2023-07-17 21:53:11,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,761 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1194) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,762 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1195
2023-07-17 21:53:11,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,762 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1195) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,762 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1196
2023-07-17 21:53:11,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,762 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1196) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,762 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1197
2023-07-17 21:53:11,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,763 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1197) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,763 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1198
2023-07-17 21:53:11,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,763 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1198) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,763 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1199
2023-07-17 21:53:11,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,764 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1199) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,764 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table810
2023-07-17 21:53:11,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,765 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table810) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,765 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table811
2023-07-17 21:53:11,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,765 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table811) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,765 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table812
2023-07-17 21:53:11,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,765 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table812) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,766 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table813
2023-07-17 21:53:11,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,766 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table813) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,766 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table814
2023-07-17 21:53:11,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,766 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table814) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,766 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1190
2023-07-17 21:53:11,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,767 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1190) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,767 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table815
2023-07-17 21:53:11,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,767 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table815) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,767 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1191
2023-07-17 21:53:11,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,768 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1191) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,768 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table816
2023-07-17 21:53:11,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,768 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table816) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,768 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1192
2023-07-17 21:53:11,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,768 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1192) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,769 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table817
2023-07-17 21:53:11,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,769 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table817) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,769 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table818
2023-07-17 21:53:11,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,769 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table818) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,769 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table819
2023-07-17 21:53:11,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,770 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table819) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,770 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1260
2023-07-17 21:53:11,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,770 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1260) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,770 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1261
2023-07-17 21:53:11,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,771 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1261) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,771 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table760
2023-07-17 21:53:11,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,772 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table760) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,772 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1020
2023-07-17 21:53:11,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,772 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1020) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,772 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1262
2023-07-17 21:53:11,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,773 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1262) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,773 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table761
2023-07-17 21:53:11,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,773 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table761) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,773 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1021
2023-07-17 21:53:11,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,774 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1021) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,774 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1263
2023-07-17 21:53:11,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,774 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1263) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,774 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table520
2023-07-17 21:53:11,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,775 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table520) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,775 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table762
2023-07-17 21:53:11,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,775 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table762) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,775 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1022
2023-07-17 21:53:11,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,776 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1022) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,776 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1264
2023-07-17 21:53:11,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,776 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1264) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,776 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table521
2023-07-17 21:53:11,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,777 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table521) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,777 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table763
2023-07-17 21:53:11,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,777 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table763) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,777 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1023
2023-07-17 21:53:11,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,777 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1023) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,777 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1265
2023-07-17 21:53:11,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,778 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1265) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,778 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table522
2023-07-17 21:53:11,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,778 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table522) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,778 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table764
2023-07-17 21:53:11,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,779 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table764) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,779 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1024
2023-07-17 21:53:11,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,779 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1024) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,779 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1266
2023-07-17 21:53:11,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,780 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1266) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,780 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table523
2023-07-17 21:53:11,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,780 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table523) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,781 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table765
2023-07-17 21:53:11,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,781 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table765) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,781 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table524
2023-07-17 21:53:11,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,781 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table524) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,781 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table766
2023-07-17 21:53:11,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,782 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table766) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,782 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table525
2023-07-17 21:53:11,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,782 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table525) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,782 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table767
2023-07-17 21:53:11,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,783 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table767) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,783 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table526
2023-07-17 21:53:11,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,783 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table526) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,783 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table768
2023-07-17 21:53:11,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,784 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table768) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,784 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table527
2023-07-17 21:53:11,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,784 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table527) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,784 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table769
2023-07-17 21:53:11,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,785 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table769) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,785 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table528
2023-07-17 21:53:11,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,785 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table528) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,785 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table529
2023-07-17 21:53:11,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,785 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table529) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,785 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table90
2023-07-17 21:53:11,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,786 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table90) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,786 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table91
2023-07-17 21:53:11,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,786 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table91) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,786 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table92
2023-07-17 21:53:11,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,787 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table92) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,787 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table93
2023-07-17 21:53:11,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,787 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table93) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,787 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1025
2023-07-17 21:53:11,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,788 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1025) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,788 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1267
2023-07-17 21:53:11,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,788 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1267) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,788 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table94
2023-07-17 21:53:11,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,789 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table94) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,789 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1026
2023-07-17 21:53:11,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,789 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1026) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,789 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1268
2023-07-17 21:53:11,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,790 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1268) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,790 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table95
2023-07-17 21:53:11,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,790 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table95) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,790 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1027
2023-07-17 21:53:11,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,790 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1027) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,790 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1269
2023-07-17 21:53:11,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,791 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1269) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,791 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table96
2023-07-17 21:53:11,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,791 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table96) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,791 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1028
2023-07-17 21:53:11,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,792 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1028) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,792 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table97
2023-07-17 21:53:11,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,792 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table97) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,792 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1029
2023-07-17 21:53:11,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,792 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1029) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,793 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table98
2023-07-17 21:53:11,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,793 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table98) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,793 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table99
2023-07-17 21:53:11,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,794 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table99) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,794 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table990
2023-07-17 21:53:11,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,794 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table990) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,794 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1250
2023-07-17 21:53:11,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,795 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1250) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,795 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table991
2023-07-17 21:53:11,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,795 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table991) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,795 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1251
2023-07-17 21:53:11,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,796 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1251) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,796 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table750
2023-07-17 21:53:11,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,796 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table750) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,796 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table992
2023-07-17 21:53:11,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,797 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table992) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,797 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1010
2023-07-17 21:53:11,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,797 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1010) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,797 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1252
2023-07-17 21:53:11,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,797 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1252) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,797 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table751
2023-07-17 21:53:11,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,798 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table751) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,798 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table993
2023-07-17 21:53:11,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,798 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table993) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,798 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1011
2023-07-17 21:53:11,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,799 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1011) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,799 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1253
2023-07-17 21:53:11,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,799 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1253) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,799 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table510
2023-07-17 21:53:11,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,800 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table510) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,800 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table752
2023-07-17 21:53:11,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,800 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table752) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,800 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table994
2023-07-17 21:53:11,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,801 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table994) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,801 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1012
2023-07-17 21:53:11,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,801 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1012) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,801 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1254
2023-07-17 21:53:11,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,802 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1254) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,802 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table511
2023-07-17 21:53:11,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,802 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table511) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,802 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table753
2023-07-17 21:53:11,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,803 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table753) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,803 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table995
2023-07-17 21:53:11,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,803 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table995) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,803 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1013
2023-07-17 21:53:11,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,803 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1013) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,803 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1255
2023-07-17 21:53:11,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,804 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1255) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,804 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table512
2023-07-17 21:53:11,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,804 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table512) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,804 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table754
2023-07-17 21:53:11,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,805 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table754) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,805 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table996
2023-07-17 21:53:11,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,805 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table996) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,805 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table513
2023-07-17 21:53:11,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,806 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table513) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,806 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table755
2023-07-17 21:53:11,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,806 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table755) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,806 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table997
2023-07-17 21:53:11,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,806 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table997) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,807 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table514
2023-07-17 21:53:11,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,807 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table514) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,807 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table756
2023-07-17 21:53:11,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,808 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table756) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,808 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table998
2023-07-17 21:53:11,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,808 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table998) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,808 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table515
2023-07-17 21:53:11,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,809 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table515) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,809 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table757
2023-07-17 21:53:11,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,809 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table757) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,809 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table999
2023-07-17 21:53:11,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,810 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table999) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,810 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table516
2023-07-17 21:53:11,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,810 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table516) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,810 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table758
2023-07-17 21:53:11,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,810 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table758) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,811 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table517
2023-07-17 21:53:11,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,811 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table517) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,811 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table759
2023-07-17 21:53:11,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,811 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table759) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,812 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table518
2023-07-17 21:53:11,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,812 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table518) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,812 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table519
2023-07-17 21:53:11,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,812 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table519) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,813 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table80
2023-07-17 21:53:11,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,813 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table80) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,813 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table81
2023-07-17 21:53:11,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,813 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table81) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,814 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table82
2023-07-17 21:53:11,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,814 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table82) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,814 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1014
2023-07-17 21:53:11,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,814 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1014) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,814 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1256
2023-07-17 21:53:11,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,815 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1256) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,815 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table83
2023-07-17 21:53:11,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,815 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table83) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,815 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1015
2023-07-17 21:53:11,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,816 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1015) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,816 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1257
2023-07-17 21:53:11,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,816 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1257) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,816 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table84
2023-07-17 21:53:11,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,817 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table84) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,817 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1016
2023-07-17 21:53:11,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,817 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1016) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,817 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1258
2023-07-17 21:53:11,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,818 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1258) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,818 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table85
2023-07-17 21:53:11,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,818 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table85) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,818 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1017
2023-07-17 21:53:11,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,819 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1017) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,819 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1259
2023-07-17 21:53:11,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,819 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1259) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,819 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table86
2023-07-17 21:53:11,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,819 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table86) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,819 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1018
2023-07-17 21:53:11,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,820 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1018) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,820 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table87
2023-07-17 21:53:11,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,820 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table87) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,820 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1019
2023-07-17 21:53:11,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,821 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1019) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,821 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table88
2023-07-17 21:53:11,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,821 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table88) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,821 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table89
2023-07-17 21:53:11,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,822 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table89) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,822 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table79
2023-07-17 21:53:11,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,823 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table79) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,823 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table780
2023-07-17 21:53:11,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,823 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table780) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,823 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table781
2023-07-17 21:53:11,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,823 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table781) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,824 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table540
2023-07-17 21:53:11,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,824 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table540) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,824 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table782
2023-07-17 21:53:11,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,824 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table782) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,824 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1240
2023-07-17 21:53:11,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,825 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1240) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,825 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table541
2023-07-17 21:53:11,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,825 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table541) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,825 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table783
2023-07-17 21:53:11,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,826 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table783) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,826 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1241
2023-07-17 21:53:11,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,826 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1241) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,826 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table300
2023-07-17 21:53:11,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,827 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table300) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,827 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table542
2023-07-17 21:53:11,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,827 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table542) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,827 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table784
2023-07-17 21:53:11,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,828 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table784) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,828 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1000
2023-07-17 21:53:11,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,828 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1000) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,828 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1242
2023-07-17 21:53:11,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,829 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1242) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,829 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table301
2023-07-17 21:53:11,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,829 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table301) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,829 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table543
2023-07-17 21:53:11,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,830 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table543) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,830 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table785
2023-07-17 21:53:11,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,830 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table785) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,830 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1001
2023-07-17 21:53:11,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,830 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1001) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,831 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1243
2023-07-17 21:53:11,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,831 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1243) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,831 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table302
2023-07-17 21:53:11,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,831 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table302) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,832 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table544
2023-07-17 21:53:11,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,832 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table544) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,832 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table786
2023-07-17 21:53:11,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,832 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table786) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,832 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1002
2023-07-17 21:53:11,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,833 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1002) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,833 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1244
2023-07-17 21:53:11,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,833 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1244) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,833 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table303
2023-07-17 21:53:11,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,834 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table303) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,834 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table545
2023-07-17 21:53:11,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,834 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table545) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,834 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table787
2023-07-17 21:53:11,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,835 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table787) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,835 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table304
2023-07-17 21:53:11,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,835 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table304) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,835 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table546
2023-07-17 21:53:11,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,836 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table546) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,836 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table788
2023-07-17 21:53:11,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,836 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table788) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,836 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table305
2023-07-17 21:53:11,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,837 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table305) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,837 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table547
2023-07-17 21:53:11,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,837 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table547) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,837 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table789
2023-07-17 21:53:11,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,838 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table789) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,838 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table306
2023-07-17 21:53:11,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,838 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table306) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,838 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table548
2023-07-17 21:53:11,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,838 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table548) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,839 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table307
2023-07-17 21:53:11,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,839 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table307) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,839 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table549
2023-07-17 21:53:11,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,839 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table549) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,839 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table308
2023-07-17 21:53:11,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,840 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table308) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,840 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table309
2023-07-17 21:53:11,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,840 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table309) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,840 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table70
2023-07-17 21:53:11,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,841 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table70) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,841 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table71
2023-07-17 21:53:11,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,841 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table71) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,841 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1003
2023-07-17 21:53:11,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,842 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1003) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,842 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1245
2023-07-17 21:53:11,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,842 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1245) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,842 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table72
2023-07-17 21:53:11,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,843 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table72) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,843 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1004
2023-07-17 21:53:11,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,843 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1004) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,843 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1246
2023-07-17 21:53:11,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,843 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1246) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,844 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table73
2023-07-17 21:53:11,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,844 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table73) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,844 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1005
2023-07-17 21:53:11,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,844 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1005) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,844 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1247
2023-07-17 21:53:11,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,845 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1247) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,845 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table74
2023-07-17 21:53:11,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,845 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table74) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,845 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1006
2023-07-17 21:53:11,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,846 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1006) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,846 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1248
2023-07-17 21:53:11,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,846 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1248) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,846 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table75
2023-07-17 21:53:11,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,847 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table75) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,847 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1007
2023-07-17 21:53:11,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,847 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1007) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,847 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1249
2023-07-17 21:53:11,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,848 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1249) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,848 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table76
2023-07-17 21:53:11,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,848 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table76) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,848 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1008
2023-07-17 21:53:11,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,849 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1008) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,849 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table77
2023-07-17 21:53:11,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,849 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table77) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,849 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1009
2023-07-17 21:53:11,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,850 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1009) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,850 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table78
2023-07-17 21:53:11,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,850 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table78) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,850 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table68
2023-07-17 21:53:11,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,851 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table68) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,851 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table69
2023-07-17 21:53:11,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,851 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table69) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,851 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table770
2023-07-17 21:53:11,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,852 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table770) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,852 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table771
2023-07-17 21:53:11,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,852 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table771) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,852 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table530
2023-07-17 21:53:11,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,853 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table530) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,853 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table772
2023-07-17 21:53:11,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,853 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table772) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,853 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1230
2023-07-17 21:53:11,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,854 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1230) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,854 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table531
2023-07-17 21:53:11,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,854 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table531) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,854 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table773
2023-07-17 21:53:11,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,855 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table773) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,855 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1231
2023-07-17 21:53:11,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,855 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1231) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,855 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table532
2023-07-17 21:53:11,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,856 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table532) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,856 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table774
2023-07-17 21:53:11,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,856 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table774) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,856 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1232
2023-07-17 21:53:11,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,857 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1232) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,857 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table533
2023-07-17 21:53:11,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,857 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table533) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,857 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table775
2023-07-17 21:53:11,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,857 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table775) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,858 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1233
2023-07-17 21:53:11,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,858 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1233) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,858 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table534
2023-07-17 21:53:11,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,858 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table534) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,859 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table776
2023-07-17 21:53:11,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,859 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table776) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,859 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table535
2023-07-17 21:53:11,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,859 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table535) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,860 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table777
2023-07-17 21:53:11,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,860 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table777) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,860 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table536
2023-07-17 21:53:11,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,860 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table536) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,860 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table778
2023-07-17 21:53:11,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,861 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table778) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,861 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table537
2023-07-17 21:53:11,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,861 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table537) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,861 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table779
2023-07-17 21:53:11,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,862 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table779) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,862 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table538
2023-07-17 21:53:11,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,862 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table538) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,862 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table539
2023-07-17 21:53:11,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,863 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table539) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,863 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table60
2023-07-17 21:53:11,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,863 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table60) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,863 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1234
2023-07-17 21:53:11,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,864 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1234) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,864 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table61
2023-07-17 21:53:11,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,864 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table61) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,864 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1235
2023-07-17 21:53:11,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,865 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1235) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,865 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table62
2023-07-17 21:53:11,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,865 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table62) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,865 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1236
2023-07-17 21:53:11,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,866 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1236) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,866 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table63
2023-07-17 21:53:11,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,866 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table63) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,866 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1237
2023-07-17 21:53:11,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,867 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1237) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,867 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table64
2023-07-17 21:53:11,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,867 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table64) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,867 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1238
2023-07-17 21:53:11,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,868 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1238) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,868 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table65
2023-07-17 21:53:11,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,868 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table65) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,868 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1239
2023-07-17 21:53:11,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,869 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1239) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,869 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table66
2023-07-17 21:53:11,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,869 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table66) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,869 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table67
2023-07-17 21:53:11,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,870 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table67) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,870 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1061
2023-07-17 21:53:11,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,870 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1061) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,870 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1062
2023-07-17 21:53:11,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,870 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1062) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,871 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1063
2023-07-17 21:53:11,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,871 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1063) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,871 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1064
2023-07-17 21:53:11,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,871 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1064) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,871 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1065
2023-07-17 21:53:11,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,872 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1065) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,872 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table960
2023-07-17 21:53:11,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,872 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table960) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,872 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1066
2023-07-17 21:53:11,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,873 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1066) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,873 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table961
2023-07-17 21:53:11,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,873 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table961) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,873 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1067
2023-07-17 21:53:11,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,874 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1067) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,874 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table720
2023-07-17 21:53:11,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,874 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table720) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,874 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table962
2023-07-17 21:53:11,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,875 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table962) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,875 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1068
2023-07-17 21:53:11,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,875 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1068) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,875 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table721
2023-07-17 21:53:11,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,876 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table721) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,876 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table963
2023-07-17 21:53:11,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,876 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table963) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,876 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table722
2023-07-17 21:53:11,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,877 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table722) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,877 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table964
2023-07-17 21:53:11,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,877 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table964) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,877 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table723
2023-07-17 21:53:11,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,878 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table723) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,878 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table965
2023-07-17 21:53:11,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,878 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table965) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,878 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table724
2023-07-17 21:53:11,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,879 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table724) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,879 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table966
2023-07-17 21:53:11,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,879 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table966) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,879 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table725
2023-07-17 21:53:11,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,880 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table725) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,880 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table967
2023-07-17 21:53:11,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,880 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table967) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,881 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table726
2023-07-17 21:53:11,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,881 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table726) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,881 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table968
2023-07-17 21:53:11,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,882 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table968) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,882 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table727
2023-07-17 21:53:11,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,882 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table727) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,882 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table969
2023-07-17 21:53:11,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,883 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table969) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,883 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table728
2023-07-17 21:53:11,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,883 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table728) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,883 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1060
2023-07-17 21:53:11,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,884 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1060) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,884 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table729
2023-07-17 21:53:11,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,884 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table729) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,884 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1069
2023-07-17 21:53:11,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,885 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1069) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,885 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1050
2023-07-17 21:53:11,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,885 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1050) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,885 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1292
2023-07-17 21:53:11,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,886 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1292) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,886 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1051
2023-07-17 21:53:11,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,886 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1051) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,886 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1293
2023-07-17 21:53:11,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,887 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1293) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,887 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1052
2023-07-17 21:53:11,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,887 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1052) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,887 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1294
2023-07-17 21:53:11,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,888 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1294) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,888 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1053
2023-07-17 21:53:11,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,888 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1053) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,888 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1295
2023-07-17 21:53:11,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,889 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1295) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,889 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1054
2023-07-17 21:53:11,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,889 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1054) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,889 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1296
2023-07-17 21:53:11,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,890 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1296) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,890 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1055
2023-07-17 21:53:11,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,890 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1055) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,890 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1297
2023-07-17 21:53:11,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,891 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1297) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,891 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table950
2023-07-17 21:53:11,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,891 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table950) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,892 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1056
2023-07-17 21:53:11,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,892 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1056) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,892 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1298
2023-07-17 21:53:11,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,892 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1298) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,893 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table951
2023-07-17 21:53:11,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,893 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table951) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,893 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1057
2023-07-17 21:53:11,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,893 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1057) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,894 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1299
2023-07-17 21:53:11,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,894 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1299) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,894 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table710
2023-07-17 21:53:11,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,894 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table710) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,895 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table952
2023-07-17 21:53:11,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,895 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table952) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,895 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table711
2023-07-17 21:53:11,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,896 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table711) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,896 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table953
2023-07-17 21:53:11,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,896 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table953) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,896 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table712
2023-07-17 21:53:11,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,897 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table712) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,897 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table954
2023-07-17 21:53:11,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,898 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table954) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,898 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table713
2023-07-17 21:53:11,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,898 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table713) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,898 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table955
2023-07-17 21:53:11,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,899 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table955) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,899 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table714
2023-07-17 21:53:11,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,899 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table714) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,899 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table956
2023-07-17 21:53:11,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,900 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table956) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,900 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table715
2023-07-17 21:53:11,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,900 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table715) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,900 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table957
2023-07-17 21:53:11,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,901 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table957) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,901 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table716
2023-07-17 21:53:11,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,901 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table716) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,901 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table958
2023-07-17 21:53:11,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,902 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table958) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,902 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1290
2023-07-17 21:53:11,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,902 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1290) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,902 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table717
2023-07-17 21:53:11,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,903 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table717) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,903 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table959
2023-07-17 21:53:11,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,903 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table959) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,903 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1291
2023-07-17 21:53:11,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,904 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1291) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,904 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table718
2023-07-17 21:53:11,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,904 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table718) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,904 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table719
2023-07-17 21:53:11,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,905 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table719) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,905 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1058
2023-07-17 21:53:11,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,905 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1058) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,905 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1059
2023-07-17 21:53:11,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,906 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1059) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,906 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1281
2023-07-17 21:53:11,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,906 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1281) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,906 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1040
2023-07-17 21:53:11,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,907 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1040) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,907 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1282
2023-07-17 21:53:11,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,907 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1282) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,907 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1041
2023-07-17 21:53:11,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,908 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1041) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,908 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1283
2023-07-17 21:53:11,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,908 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1283) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,908 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table980
2023-07-17 21:53:11,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,909 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table980) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,909 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1042
2023-07-17 21:53:11,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,909 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1042) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,909 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1284
2023-07-17 21:53:11,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,910 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1284) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,910 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table981
2023-07-17 21:53:11,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,910 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table981) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,910 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1043
2023-07-17 21:53:11,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,911 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1043) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,911 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1285
2023-07-17 21:53:11,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,911 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1285) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,911 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table740
2023-07-17 21:53:11,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,912 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table740) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,912 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table982
2023-07-17 21:53:11,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,912 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table982) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,912 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1044
2023-07-17 21:53:11,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,913 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1044) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,913 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1286
2023-07-17 21:53:11,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,914 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1286) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,914 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table741
2023-07-17 21:53:11,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,914 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table741) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,914 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table983
2023-07-17 21:53:11,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,915 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table983) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,915 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1045
2023-07-17 21:53:11,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,915 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1045) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,915 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1287
2023-07-17 21:53:11,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,916 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1287) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,916 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table500
2023-07-17 21:53:11,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,916 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table500) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,916 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table742
2023-07-17 21:53:11,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,917 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table742) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,917 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table984
2023-07-17 21:53:11,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,917 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table984) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,917 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1046
2023-07-17 21:53:11,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,917 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1046) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,917 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1288
2023-07-17 21:53:11,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,918 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1288) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,918 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table501
2023-07-17 21:53:11,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,918 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table501) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,918 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table743
2023-07-17 21:53:11,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,919 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table743) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,919 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table985
2023-07-17 21:53:11,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,919 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table985) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,919 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table502
2023-07-17 21:53:11,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,920 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table502) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,920 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table744
2023-07-17 21:53:11,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,920 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table744) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,920 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table986
2023-07-17 21:53:11,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,921 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table986) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,921 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table503
2023-07-17 21:53:11,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,921 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table503) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,921 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table745
2023-07-17 21:53:11,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,922 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table745) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,922 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table987
2023-07-17 21:53:11,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,922 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table987) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,922 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table504
2023-07-17 21:53:11,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,923 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table504) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,923 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table746
2023-07-17 21:53:11,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,923 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table746) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,923 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table988
2023-07-17 21:53:11,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,923 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table988) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,924 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table505
2023-07-17 21:53:11,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,924 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table505) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,924 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table747
2023-07-17 21:53:11,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,924 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table747) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,924 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table989
2023-07-17 21:53:11,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,925 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table989) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,925 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table506
2023-07-17 21:53:11,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,925 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table506) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,925 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table748
2023-07-17 21:53:11,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,926 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table748) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,926 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table507
2023-07-17 21:53:11,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,926 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table507) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,926 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table749
2023-07-17 21:53:11,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,927 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table749) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,927 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table508
2023-07-17 21:53:11,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,927 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table508) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,927 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1280
2023-07-17 21:53:11,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,928 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1280) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,928 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table509
2023-07-17 21:53:11,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,928 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table509) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,928 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1047
2023-07-17 21:53:11,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,929 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1047) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,929 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1289
2023-07-17 21:53:11,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,929 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1289) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,929 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1048
2023-07-17 21:53:11,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,930 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1048) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,930 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1049
2023-07-17 21:53:11,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,930 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1049) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,930 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1270
2023-07-17 21:53:11,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,931 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1270) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,931 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1271
2023-07-17 21:53:11,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,931 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1271) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,931 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1030
2023-07-17 21:53:11,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,932 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1030) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,932 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1272
2023-07-17 21:53:11,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,932 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1272) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,932 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1031
2023-07-17 21:53:11,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,933 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1031) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,933 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1273
2023-07-17 21:53:11,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,933 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1273) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,933 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table970
2023-07-17 21:53:11,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,934 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table970) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,934 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1032
2023-07-17 21:53:11,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,934 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1032) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,934 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1274
2023-07-17 21:53:11,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,935 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1274) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,935 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table971
2023-07-17 21:53:11,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,935 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table971) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,935 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1033
2023-07-17 21:53:11,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,935 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1033) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,936 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1275
2023-07-17 21:53:11,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,936 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1275) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,936 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table730
2023-07-17 21:53:11,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,936 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table730) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,936 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table972
2023-07-17 21:53:11,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,937 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table972) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,937 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1034
2023-07-17 21:53:11,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,937 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1034) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,937 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1276
2023-07-17 21:53:11,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,938 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1276) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,938 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table731
2023-07-17 21:53:11,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,938 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table731) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,938 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table973
2023-07-17 21:53:11,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,939 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table973) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,939 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1035
2023-07-17 21:53:11,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,939 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1035) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,939 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1277
2023-07-17 21:53:11,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,940 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1277) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,940 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table732
2023-07-17 21:53:11,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,940 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table732) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,940 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table974
2023-07-17 21:53:11,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,941 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table974) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,941 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table733
2023-07-17 21:53:11,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,941 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table733) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,941 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table975
2023-07-17 21:53:11,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,942 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table975) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,942 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table734
2023-07-17 21:53:11,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,942 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table734) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,942 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table976
2023-07-17 21:53:11,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,943 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table976) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,943 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table735
2023-07-17 21:53:11,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,943 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table735) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,943 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table977
2023-07-17 21:53:11,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,944 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table977) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,944 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table736
2023-07-17 21:53:11,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,944 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table736) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,944 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table978
2023-07-17 21:53:11,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,945 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table978) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,945 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table737
2023-07-17 21:53:11,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,945 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table737) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,945 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table979
2023-07-17 21:53:11,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,946 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table979) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,946 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table738
2023-07-17 21:53:11,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,946 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table738) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,946 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table739
2023-07-17 21:53:11,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,947 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table739) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,947 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1036
2023-07-17 21:53:11,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,947 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1036) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,947 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1278
2023-07-17 21:53:11,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,947 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1278) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,948 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1037
2023-07-17 21:53:11,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,948 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1037) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,948 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1279
2023-07-17 21:53:11,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,948 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1279) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,948 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1038
2023-07-17 21:53:11,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,949 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1038) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,949 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1039
2023-07-17 21:53:11,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,949 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1039) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,949 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table13
2023-07-17 21:53:11,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,950 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table13) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,950 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table361
2023-07-17 21:53:11,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,950 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table361) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,950 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table14
2023-07-17 21:53:11,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,951 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table14) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,951 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table120
2023-07-17 21:53:11,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,951 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table120) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,951 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table362
2023-07-17 21:53:11,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,951 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table362) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,951 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table15
2023-07-17 21:53:11,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,952 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table15) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,952 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table121
2023-07-17 21:53:11,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,952 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table121) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,952 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table363
2023-07-17 21:53:11,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,952 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table363) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,952 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table16
2023-07-17 21:53:11,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,952 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table16) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,952 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table122
2023-07-17 21:53:11,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,953 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table122) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,953 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table364
2023-07-17 21:53:11,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,953 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table364) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,953 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table17
2023-07-17 21:53:11,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,953 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table17) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,953 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table123
2023-07-17 21:53:11,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,953 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table123) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,953 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table365
2023-07-17 21:53:11,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,954 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table365) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,954 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table18
2023-07-17 21:53:11,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,954 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table18) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,954 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table124
2023-07-17 21:53:11,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,954 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table124) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,954 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table366
2023-07-17 21:53:11,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,955 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table366) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,955 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table19
2023-07-17 21:53:11,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,955 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table19) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,955 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table125
2023-07-17 21:53:11,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,955 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table125) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,955 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table367
2023-07-17 21:53:11,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,956 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table367) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,956 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table126
2023-07-17 21:53:11,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,956 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table126) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,956 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table368
2023-07-17 21:53:11,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,956 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table368) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,956 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1420
2023-07-17 21:53:11,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,956 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1420) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,956 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table127
2023-07-17 21:53:11,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,957 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table127) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,957 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table369
2023-07-17 21:53:11,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,957 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table369) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,957 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table128
2023-07-17 21:53:11,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,957 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table128) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,957 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table129
2023-07-17 21:53:11,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,957 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table129) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,957 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1429
2023-07-17 21:53:11,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,958 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1429) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,958 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1421
2023-07-17 21:53:11,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,958 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1421) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,958 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1422
2023-07-17 21:53:11,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,958 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1422) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,958 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1423
2023-07-17 21:53:11,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,958 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1423) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,959 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1424
2023-07-17 21:53:11,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,959 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1424) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,959 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1425
2023-07-17 21:53:11,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,959 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1425) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,959 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table10
2023-07-17 21:53:11,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,959 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table10) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,959 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1426
2023-07-17 21:53:11,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,960 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1426) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,960 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table11
2023-07-17 21:53:11,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,960 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table11) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,960 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table370
2023-07-17 21:53:11,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,960 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table370) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,960 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1427
2023-07-17 21:53:11,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,961 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1427) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,961 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table12
2023-07-17 21:53:11,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,961 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table12) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,961 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table371
2023-07-17 21:53:11,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,962 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table371) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,962 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1428
2023-07-17 21:53:11,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,962 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1428) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,962 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table350
2023-07-17 21:53:11,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,963 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table350) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,963 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table592
2023-07-17 21:53:11,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,963 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table592) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,963 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table351
2023-07-17 21:53:11,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,964 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table351) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,964 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table593
2023-07-17 21:53:11,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,964 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table593) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,964 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table110
2023-07-17 21:53:11,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,965 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table110) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,965 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table352
2023-07-17 21:53:11,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,966 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table352) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,966 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table594
2023-07-17 21:53:11,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,966 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table594) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,966 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table111
2023-07-17 21:53:11,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,967 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table111) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,967 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table353
2023-07-17 21:53:11,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,969 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table353) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,969 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table595
2023-07-17 21:53:11,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,969 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table595) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,969 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table112
2023-07-17 21:53:11,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,970 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table112) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,970 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table354
2023-07-17 21:53:11,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,970 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table354) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,970 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table596
2023-07-17 21:53:11,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,971 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table596) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,971 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table113
2023-07-17 21:53:11,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,971 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table113) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,971 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table355
2023-07-17 21:53:11,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,972 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table355) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,972 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table597
2023-07-17 21:53:11,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,972 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table597) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,972 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table114
2023-07-17 21:53:11,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,973 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table114) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,973 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table356
2023-07-17 21:53:11,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,973 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table356) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,973 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table598
2023-07-17 21:53:11,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,974 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table598) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,974 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table115
2023-07-17 21:53:11,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,974 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table115) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,974 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table357
2023-07-17 21:53:11,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,974 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table357) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,975 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table599
2023-07-17 21:53:11,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,975 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table599) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,975 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table116
2023-07-17 21:53:11,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,975 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table116) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,976 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table358
2023-07-17 21:53:11,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,976 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table358) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,976 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table117
2023-07-17 21:53:11,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,977 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table117) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,977 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table359
2023-07-17 21:53:11,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,977 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table359) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,977 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table118
2023-07-17 21:53:11,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,977 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table118) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,978 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table119
2023-07-17 21:53:11,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,978 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table119) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,978 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1418
2023-07-17 21:53:11,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,978 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1418) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,979 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1419
2023-07-17 21:53:11,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,979 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1419) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,979 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1410
2023-07-17 21:53:11,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,979 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1410) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,979 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1411
2023-07-17 21:53:11,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,980 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1411) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,980 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1412
2023-07-17 21:53:11,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,980 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1412) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,980 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1413
2023-07-17 21:53:11,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,981 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1413) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,981 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1414
2023-07-17 21:53:11,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,981 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1414) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,981 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1415
2023-07-17 21:53:11,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,982 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1415) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,982 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1416
2023-07-17 21:53:11,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,983 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1416) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,983 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table360
2023-07-17 21:53:11,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,983 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table360) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,983 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1417
2023-07-17 21:53:11,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,984 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1417) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,984 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table141
2023-07-17 21:53:11,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,984 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table141) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,984 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table383
2023-07-17 21:53:11,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,984 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table383) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,985 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table142
2023-07-17 21:53:11,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,985 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table142) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,985 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table384
2023-07-17 21:53:11,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,986 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table384) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,986 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table143
2023-07-17 21:53:11,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,986 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table143) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,986 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table385
2023-07-17 21:53:11,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,986 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table385) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,986 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table144
2023-07-17 21:53:11,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,987 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table144) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,987 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table386
2023-07-17 21:53:11,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,987 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table386) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,987 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table145
2023-07-17 21:53:11,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,988 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table145) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,988 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table387
2023-07-17 21:53:11,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,988 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table387) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,988 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table146
2023-07-17 21:53:11,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,989 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table146) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,989 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table388
2023-07-17 21:53:11,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,989 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table388) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,989 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table147
2023-07-17 21:53:11,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,990 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table147) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,990 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table389
2023-07-17 21:53:11,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,990 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table389) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,990 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table148
2023-07-17 21:53:11,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,990 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table148) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,991 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table149
2023-07-17 21:53:11,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,991 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table149) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,991 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-17 21:53:11,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,991 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,991 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1407
2023-07-17 21:53:11,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,992 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1407) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,992 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-17 21:53:11,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,992 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,992 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1408
2023-07-17 21:53:11,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,993 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1408) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,993 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-17 21:53:11,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,993 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,993 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1409
2023-07-17 21:53:11,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,993 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1409) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,993 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-17 21:53:11,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,994 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,994 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,994 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,994 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,994 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,994 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1400
2023-07-17 21:53:11,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,995 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1400) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,995 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1401
2023-07-17 21:53:11,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,995 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1401) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,995 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1402
2023-07-17 21:53:11,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,996 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1402) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,996 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table9
2023-07-17 21:53:11,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,996 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table9) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,996 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table390
2023-07-17 21:53:11,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,997 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table390) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,997 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1403
2023-07-17 21:53:11,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,997 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1403) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,997 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table8
2023-07-17 21:53:11,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,998 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table8) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,998 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table391
2023-07-17 21:53:11,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,998 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table391) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,998 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1404
2023-07-17 21:53:11,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,999 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1404) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,999 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-17 21:53:11,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,999 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:11,999 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table150
2023-07-17 21:53:11,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:11,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:11,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:11,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,000 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table150) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,000 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table392
2023-07-17 21:53:12,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,000 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table392) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,000 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1405
2023-07-17 21:53:12,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,001 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1405) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,001 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-17 21:53:12,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,001 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,001 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table151
2023-07-17 21:53:12,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,002 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table151) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,002 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table393
2023-07-17 21:53:12,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,002 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table393) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,002 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1406
2023-07-17 21:53:12,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,003 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1406) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,003 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table130
2023-07-17 21:53:12,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,003 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table130) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,003 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table372
2023-07-17 21:53:12,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,003 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table372) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,004 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table131
2023-07-17 21:53:12,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,004 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table131) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,004 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table373
2023-07-17 21:53:12,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,005 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table373) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,005 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table132
2023-07-17 21:53:12,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,005 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table132) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,005 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table374
2023-07-17 21:53:12,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,006 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table374) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,006 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table133
2023-07-17 21:53:12,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,006 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table133) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,006 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table375
2023-07-17 21:53:12,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,007 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table375) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,007 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table134
2023-07-17 21:53:12,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,007 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table134) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,007 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table376
2023-07-17 21:53:12,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,008 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table376) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,008 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table135
2023-07-17 21:53:12,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,008 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table135) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,008 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table377
2023-07-17 21:53:12,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,008 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table377) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,009 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table136
2023-07-17 21:53:12,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,009 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table136) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,009 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table378
2023-07-17 21:53:12,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,009 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table378) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,009 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table137
2023-07-17 21:53:12,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,010 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table137) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,010 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table379
2023-07-17 21:53:12,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,010 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table379) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,011 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table138
2023-07-17 21:53:12,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,011 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table138) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,012 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table139
2023-07-17 21:53:12,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,012 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table139) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,012 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table380
2023-07-17 21:53:12,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,012 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table380) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,012 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table381
2023-07-17 21:53:12,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,013 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table381) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,013 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table140
2023-07-17 21:53:12,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,013 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table140) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,013 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table382
2023-07-17 21:53:12,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,014 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table382) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,014 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table57
2023-07-17 21:53:12,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,014 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table57) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,014 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table58
2023-07-17 21:53:12,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,015 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table58) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,015 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table560
2023-07-17 21:53:12,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,015 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table560) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,015 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table59
2023-07-17 21:53:12,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,016 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table59) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,016 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table561
2023-07-17 21:53:12,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,016 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table561) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,016 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table320
2023-07-17 21:53:12,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,017 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table320) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,017 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table562
2023-07-17 21:53:12,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,017 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table562) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,017 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table321
2023-07-17 21:53:12,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,017 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table321) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,018 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table563
2023-07-17 21:53:12,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,018 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table563) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,018 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table322
2023-07-17 21:53:12,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,018 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table322) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,018 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table564
2023-07-17 21:53:12,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,019 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table564) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,019 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1220
2023-07-17 21:53:12,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,019 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1220) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,019 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table323
2023-07-17 21:53:12,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,020 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table323) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,020 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table565
2023-07-17 21:53:12,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,020 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table565) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,020 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1221
2023-07-17 21:53:12,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,021 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1221) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,021 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table324
2023-07-17 21:53:12,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,021 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table324) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,021 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table566
2023-07-17 21:53:12,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,021 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table566) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,022 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1222
2023-07-17 21:53:12,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,022 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1222) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,022 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table325
2023-07-17 21:53:12,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,022 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table325) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,022 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table567
2023-07-17 21:53:12,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,023 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table567) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,023 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table326
2023-07-17 21:53:12,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,023 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table326) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,023 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table568
2023-07-17 21:53:12,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,024 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table568) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,024 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table327
2023-07-17 21:53:12,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,024 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table327) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,024 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table569
2023-07-17 21:53:12,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,025 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table569) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,025 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table328
2023-07-17 21:53:12,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,025 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table328) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,025 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table329
2023-07-17 21:53:12,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,026 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table329) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,026 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1223
2023-07-17 21:53:12,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,026 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1223) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,026 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table50
2023-07-17 21:53:12,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,027 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table50) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,027 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1224
2023-07-17 21:53:12,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,027 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1224) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,027 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table51
2023-07-17 21:53:12,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,028 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table51) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,028 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1225
2023-07-17 21:53:12,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,028 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1225) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,028 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table52
2023-07-17 21:53:12,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,029 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table52) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,029 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1226
2023-07-17 21:53:12,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,029 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1226) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,029 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table53
2023-07-17 21:53:12,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,030 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table53) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,030 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1227
2023-07-17 21:53:12,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,030 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1227) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,030 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table54
2023-07-17 21:53:12,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,031 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table54) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,031 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1228
2023-07-17 21:53:12,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,031 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1228) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,031 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table55
2023-07-17 21:53:12,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,032 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table55) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,032 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1229
2023-07-17 21:53:12,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,032 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1229) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,032 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table56
2023-07-17 21:53:12,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,032 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table56) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,033 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table46
2023-07-17 21:53:12,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,033 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table46) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,033 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table790
2023-07-17 21:53:12,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,033 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table790) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,033 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table47
2023-07-17 21:53:12,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,034 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table47) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,034 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table791
2023-07-17 21:53:12,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,034 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table791) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,034 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table48
2023-07-17 21:53:12,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,035 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table48) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,035 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table550
2023-07-17 21:53:12,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,035 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table550) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,035 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table792
2023-07-17 21:53:12,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,036 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table792) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,036 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table49
2023-07-17 21:53:12,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,036 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table49) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,036 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table551
2023-07-17 21:53:12,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,037 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table551) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,037 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table793
2023-07-17 21:53:12,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,037 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table793) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,037 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table310
2023-07-17 21:53:12,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,038 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table310) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,038 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table552
2023-07-17 21:53:12,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,038 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table552) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,038 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table794
2023-07-17 21:53:12,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,039 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table794) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,039 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table311
2023-07-17 21:53:12,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,039 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table311) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,039 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table553
2023-07-17 21:53:12,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,040 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table553) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,040 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table795
2023-07-17 21:53:12,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,040 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table795) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,040 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table312
2023-07-17 21:53:12,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,041 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table312) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,041 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table554
2023-07-17 21:53:12,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,041 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table554) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,041 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table796
2023-07-17 21:53:12,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,042 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table796) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,042 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1210
2023-07-17 21:53:12,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,042 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1210) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,042 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table313
2023-07-17 21:53:12,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,043 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table313) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,043 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table555
2023-07-17 21:53:12,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,043 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table555) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,043 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table797
2023-07-17 21:53:12,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,044 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table797) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,044 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1211
2023-07-17 21:53:12,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,044 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1211) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,044 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table314
2023-07-17 21:53:12,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,045 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table314) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,045 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table556
2023-07-17 21:53:12,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,045 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table556) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,045 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table798
2023-07-17 21:53:12,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,045 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table798) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,045 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table315
2023-07-17 21:53:12,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,046 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table315) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,046 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table557
2023-07-17 21:53:12,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,046 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table557) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,046 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table799
2023-07-17 21:53:12,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,047 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table799) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,047 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table316
2023-07-17 21:53:12,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,047 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table316) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,047 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table558
2023-07-17 21:53:12,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,048 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table558) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,048 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table317
2023-07-17 21:53:12,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,048 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table317) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,048 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table559
2023-07-17 21:53:12,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,048 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table559) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,048 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table318
2023-07-17 21:53:12,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,049 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table318) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,049 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table319
2023-07-17 21:53:12,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,049 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table319) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,049 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1212
2023-07-17 21:53:12,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,050 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1212) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,050 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1213
2023-07-17 21:53:12,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,050 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1213) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,050 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table40
2023-07-17 21:53:12,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,051 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table40) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,051 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1214
2023-07-17 21:53:12,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,051 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1214) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,051 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table41
2023-07-17 21:53:12,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,051 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table41) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,052 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1215
2023-07-17 21:53:12,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,052 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1215) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,052 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table42
2023-07-17 21:53:12,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,052 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table42) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,052 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1216
2023-07-17 21:53:12,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,053 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1216) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,053 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table43
2023-07-17 21:53:12,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,053 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table43) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,053 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1217
2023-07-17 21:53:12,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,054 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1217) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,054 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table44
2023-07-17 21:53:12,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,054 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table44) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,054 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1218
2023-07-17 21:53:12,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,055 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1218) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,055 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table45
2023-07-17 21:53:12,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,055 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table45) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,055 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1219
2023-07-17 21:53:12,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,056 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1219) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,056 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table35
2023-07-17 21:53:12,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,056 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table35) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,056 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table581
2023-07-17 21:53:12,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,057 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table581) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,057 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table36
2023-07-17 21:53:12,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,057 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table36) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,057 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table340
2023-07-17 21:53:12,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,057 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table340) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,058 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table582
2023-07-17 21:53:12,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,058 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table582) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,058 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table37
2023-07-17 21:53:12,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,058 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table37) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,058 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table341
2023-07-17 21:53:12,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,059 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table341) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,059 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table583
2023-07-17 21:53:12,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,059 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table583) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,059 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table38
2023-07-17 21:53:12,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,060 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table38) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,060 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table100
2023-07-17 21:53:12,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,060 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table100) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,060 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table342
2023-07-17 21:53:12,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,061 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table342) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,061 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table584
2023-07-17 21:53:12,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,061 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table584) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,061 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table39
2023-07-17 21:53:12,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,061 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table39) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,062 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table101
2023-07-17 21:53:12,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,062 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table101) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,062 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table343
2023-07-17 21:53:12,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,062 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table343) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,062 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table585
2023-07-17 21:53:12,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,063 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table585) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,063 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table102
2023-07-17 21:53:12,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,063 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table102) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,063 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table344
2023-07-17 21:53:12,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,064 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table344) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,064 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table586
2023-07-17 21:53:12,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,064 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table586) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,064 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table103
2023-07-17 21:53:12,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,065 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table103) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,065 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table345
2023-07-17 21:53:12,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,065 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table345) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,065 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table587
2023-07-17 21:53:12,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,066 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table587) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,066 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table104
2023-07-17 21:53:12,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,066 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table104) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,066 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table346
2023-07-17 21:53:12,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,067 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table346) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,067 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table588
2023-07-17 21:53:12,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,067 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table588) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,067 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1200
2023-07-17 21:53:12,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,067 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1200) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,067 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table105
2023-07-17 21:53:12,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,068 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table105) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,068 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table347
2023-07-17 21:53:12,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,069 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table347) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,069 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table589
2023-07-17 21:53:12,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,069 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table589) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,069 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table106
2023-07-17 21:53:12,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,070 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table106) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,070 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table348
2023-07-17 21:53:12,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,070 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table348) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,070 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table107
2023-07-17 21:53:12,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,071 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table107) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,071 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table349
2023-07-17 21:53:12,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,071 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table349) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,071 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table108
2023-07-17 21:53:12,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,071 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table108) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,072 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table109
2023-07-17 21:53:12,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,072 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table109) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,072 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1209
2023-07-17 21:53:12,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,072 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1209) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,072 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1201
2023-07-17 21:53:12,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,073 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1201) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,073 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1202
2023-07-17 21:53:12,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,073 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1202) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,073 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1203
2023-07-17 21:53:12,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,074 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1203) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,074 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table30
2023-07-17 21:53:12,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,074 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table30) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,074 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1204
2023-07-17 21:53:12,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,075 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1204) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,075 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table31
2023-07-17 21:53:12,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,075 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table31) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,075 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1205
2023-07-17 21:53:12,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,076 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1205) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,076 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table32
2023-07-17 21:53:12,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,076 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table32) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,076 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1206
2023-07-17 21:53:12,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,076 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1206) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,076 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table33
2023-07-17 21:53:12,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,077 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table33) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,077 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table590
2023-07-17 21:53:12,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,077 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table590) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,077 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1207
2023-07-17 21:53:12,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,078 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1207) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,078 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table34
2023-07-17 21:53:12,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,078 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table34) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,078 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table591
2023-07-17 21:53:12,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,079 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table591) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,079 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1208
2023-07-17 21:53:12,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,079 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1208) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,079 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table24
2023-07-17 21:53:12,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,080 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table24) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,080 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table570
2023-07-17 21:53:12,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,080 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table570) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,080 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table25
2023-07-17 21:53:12,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,081 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table25) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,081 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table571
2023-07-17 21:53:12,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,081 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table571) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,081 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table26
2023-07-17 21:53:12,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,082 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table26) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,082 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table330
2023-07-17 21:53:12,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,082 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table330) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,082 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table572
2023-07-17 21:53:12,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,083 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table572) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,083 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table27
2023-07-17 21:53:12,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,084 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table27) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,084 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table331
2023-07-17 21:53:12,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,084 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table331) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,084 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table573
2023-07-17 21:53:12,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,085 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table573) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,085 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table28
2023-07-17 21:53:12,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,085 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table28) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,085 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table332
2023-07-17 21:53:12,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,086 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table332) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,086 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table574
2023-07-17 21:53:12,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,086 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table574) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,086 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table29
2023-07-17 21:53:12,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,087 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table29) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,087 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table333
2023-07-17 21:53:12,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,087 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table333) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,087 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table575
2023-07-17 21:53:12,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,088 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table575) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,088 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table334
2023-07-17 21:53:12,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,088 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table334) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,088 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table576
2023-07-17 21:53:12,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,088 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table576) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,088 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1430
2023-07-17 21:53:12,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,089 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1430) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,089 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table335
2023-07-17 21:53:12,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,089 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table335) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,089 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table577
2023-07-17 21:53:12,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,090 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table577) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,090 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1431
2023-07-17 21:53:12,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,090 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1431) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,090 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table336
2023-07-17 21:53:12,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,091 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table336) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,091 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table578
2023-07-17 21:53:12,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,091 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table578) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,091 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table337
2023-07-17 21:53:12,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,092 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table337) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,092 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table579
2023-07-17 21:53:12,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,092 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table579) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,092 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table338
2023-07-17 21:53:12,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,092 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table338) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,092 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table339
2023-07-17 21:53:12,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,093 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table339) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,093 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table20
2023-07-17 21:53:12,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,093 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table20) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,093 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table21
2023-07-17 21:53:12,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,094 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table21) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,094 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table22
2023-07-17 21:53:12,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,094 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table22) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,094 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table23
2023-07-17 21:53:12,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,095 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table23) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,095 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table580
2023-07-17 21:53:12,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,095 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table580) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,095 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table284
2023-07-17 21:53:12,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,096 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table284) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,096 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table285
2023-07-17 21:53:12,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,096 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table285) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,096 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table286
2023-07-17 21:53:12,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,096 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table286) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,097 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table287
2023-07-17 21:53:12,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,097 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table287) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,098 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table288
2023-07-17 21:53:12,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,098 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table288) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,098 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table289
2023-07-17 21:53:12,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,099 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table289) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,099 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table290
2023-07-17 21:53:12,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,099 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table290) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,099 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table291
2023-07-17 21:53:12,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,099 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table291) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,100 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table292
2023-07-17 21:53:12,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,100 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table292) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,100 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table293
2023-07-17 21:53:12,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,100 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table293) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,100 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table294
2023-07-17 21:53:12,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,101 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table294) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,101 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table273
2023-07-17 21:53:12,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,101 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table273) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,101 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table274
2023-07-17 21:53:12,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,102 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table274) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,102 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table275
2023-07-17 21:53:12,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,102 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table275) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,102 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table276
2023-07-17 21:53:12,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,103 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table276) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,103 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table277
2023-07-17 21:53:12,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,103 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table277) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,103 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table278
2023-07-17 21:53:12,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,104 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table278) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,104 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table279
2023-07-17 21:53:12,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,104 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table279) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,104 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table280
2023-07-17 21:53:12,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,104 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table280) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,105 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table281
2023-07-17 21:53:12,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,105 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table281) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,105 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table282
2023-07-17 21:53:12,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,105 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table282) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,105 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table283
2023-07-17 21:53:12,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,106 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table283) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,106 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table295
2023-07-17 21:53:12,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,106 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table295) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,106 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table296
2023-07-17 21:53:12,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,107 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table296) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,107 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table297
2023-07-17 21:53:12,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,107 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table297) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,107 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table298
2023-07-17 21:53:12,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,108 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table298) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,108 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table299
2023-07-17 21:53:12,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,108 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table299) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,108 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table920
2023-07-17 21:53:12,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,109 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table920) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,109 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table921
2023-07-17 21:53:12,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,109 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table921) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,109 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table922
2023-07-17 21:53:12,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,109 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table922) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,110 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table923
2023-07-17 21:53:12,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,110 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table923) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,110 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table924
2023-07-17 21:53:12,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,110 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table924) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,110 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table925
2023-07-17 21:53:12,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,111 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table925) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,111 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table926
2023-07-17 21:53:12,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,111 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table926) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,111 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table927
2023-07-17 21:53:12,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,113 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table927) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,113 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table928
2023-07-17 21:53:12,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,113 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table928) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,113 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table929
2023-07-17 21:53:12,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,113 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table929) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,113 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1094
2023-07-17 21:53:12,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,114 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1094) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,114 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1095
2023-07-17 21:53:12,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,114 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1095) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,114 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1096
2023-07-17 21:53:12,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,115 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1096) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,115 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1097
2023-07-17 21:53:12,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,115 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1097) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,115 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1098
2023-07-17 21:53:12,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,116 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1098) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,116 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1099
2023-07-17 21:53:12,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,116 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1099) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,116 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table910
2023-07-17 21:53:12,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,117 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table910) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,117 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table911
2023-07-17 21:53:12,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,117 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table911) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,117 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table912
2023-07-17 21:53:12,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,118 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table912) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,118 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1090
2023-07-17 21:53:12,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,118 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1090) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,118 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table913
2023-07-17 21:53:12,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,118 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table913) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,118 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1091
2023-07-17 21:53:12,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,119 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1091) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,119 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table914
2023-07-17 21:53:12,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,119 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table914) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,119 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1092
2023-07-17 21:53:12,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,120 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1092) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,120 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table915
2023-07-17 21:53:12,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,120 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table915) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,120 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1093
2023-07-17 21:53:12,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,121 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1093) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,121 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table916
2023-07-17 21:53:12,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,121 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table916) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,121 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table917
2023-07-17 21:53:12,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,121 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table917) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,122 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table918
2023-07-17 21:53:12,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,122 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table918) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,122 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table919
2023-07-17 21:53:12,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,122 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table919) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,122 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1083
2023-07-17 21:53:12,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,123 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1083) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,123 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1084
2023-07-17 21:53:12,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,123 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1084) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,123 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1085
2023-07-17 21:53:12,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,124 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1085) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,124 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1086
2023-07-17 21:53:12,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,124 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1086) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,124 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1087
2023-07-17 21:53:12,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,125 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1087) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,125 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1088
2023-07-17 21:53:12,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,125 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1088) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,125 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1089
2023-07-17 21:53:12,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,126 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1089) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,126 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table940
2023-07-17 21:53:12,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,126 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table940) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,126 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table941
2023-07-17 21:53:12,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,129 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table941) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,129 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table700
2023-07-17 21:53:12,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,129 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table700) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,129 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table942
2023-07-17 21:53:12,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,130 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table942) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,130 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table701
2023-07-17 21:53:12,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,130 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table701) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,130 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table943
2023-07-17 21:53:12,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,131 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table943) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,131 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table702
2023-07-17 21:53:12,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,131 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table702) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,131 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table944
2023-07-17 21:53:12,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,131 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table944) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,131 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table703
2023-07-17 21:53:12,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,132 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table703) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,132 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table945
2023-07-17 21:53:12,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,132 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table945) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,132 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table704
2023-07-17 21:53:12,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,133 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table704) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,133 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table946
2023-07-17 21:53:12,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,133 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table946) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,133 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1080
2023-07-17 21:53:12,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,133 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1080) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,133 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table705
2023-07-17 21:53:12,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,134 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table705) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,134 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table947
2023-07-17 21:53:12,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,134 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table947) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,134 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1081
2023-07-17 21:53:12,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,135 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1081) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,135 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table706
2023-07-17 21:53:12,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,135 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table706) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,135 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table948
2023-07-17 21:53:12,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,135 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table948) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,136 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1082
2023-07-17 21:53:12,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,136 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1082) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,136 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table707
2023-07-17 21:53:12,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,136 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table707) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,136 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table949
2023-07-17 21:53:12,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,137 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table949) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,137 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table708
2023-07-17 21:53:12,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,137 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table708) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,137 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table709
2023-07-17 21:53:12,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,137 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table709) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,137 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1072
2023-07-17 21:53:12,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,138 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1072) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,138 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1073
2023-07-17 21:53:12,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,138 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1073) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,138 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1074
2023-07-17 21:53:12,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,138 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1074) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,139 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1075
2023-07-17 21:53:12,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,139 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1075) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,139 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1076
2023-07-17 21:53:12,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,139 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1076) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,139 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1077
2023-07-17 21:53:12,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,140 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1077) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,140 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1078
2023-07-17 21:53:12,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,140 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1078) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,140 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1079
2023-07-17 21:53:12,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,140 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1079) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,140 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table930
2023-07-17 21:53:12,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,141 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table930) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,141 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table931
2023-07-17 21:53:12,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,141 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table931) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,141 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table932
2023-07-17 21:53:12,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,143 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table932) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,143 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table933
2023-07-17 21:53:12,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,143 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table933) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,143 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table934
2023-07-17 21:53:12,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,144 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table934) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,144 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table935
2023-07-17 21:53:12,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,144 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table935) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,144 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table936
2023-07-17 21:53:12,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,144 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table936) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,144 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1070
2023-07-17 21:53:12,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,145 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1070) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,145 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table937
2023-07-17 21:53:12,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,145 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table937) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,145 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1071
2023-07-17 21:53:12,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,146 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1071) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,146 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table938
2023-07-17 21:53:12,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,146 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table938) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,146 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table939
2023-07-17 21:53:12,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,147 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table939) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,147 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table900
2023-07-17 21:53:12,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,147 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table900) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,147 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table901
2023-07-17 21:53:12,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,148 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table901) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,148 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table902
2023-07-17 21:53:12,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,148 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table902) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,148 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table903
2023-07-17 21:53:12,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,149 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table903) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,149 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table904
2023-07-17 21:53:12,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,149 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table904) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,149 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table905
2023-07-17 21:53:12,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,149 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table905) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,150 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table906
2023-07-17 21:53:12,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,150 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table906) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,150 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table907
2023-07-17 21:53:12,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,150 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table907) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,150 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table908
2023-07-17 21:53:12,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,151 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table908) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,151 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table909
2023-07-17 21:53:12,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718881822=1, srv1048072969=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,151 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table909) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,152 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table13
2023-07-17 21:53:12,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1155644669=0, srv214262466=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,153 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table13) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,153 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table14
2023-07-17 21:53:12,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1155644669=0, srv214262466=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,153 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table14) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,153 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table15
2023-07-17 21:53:12,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1155644669=0, srv214262466=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,154 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table15) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,154 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table16
2023-07-17 21:53:12,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1155644669=0, srv214262466=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,154 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table16) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,154 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table17
2023-07-17 21:53:12,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1155644669=0, srv214262466=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,155 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table17) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,155 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table18
2023-07-17 21:53:12,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1155644669=0, srv214262466=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,155 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table18) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,155 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table19
2023-07-17 21:53:12,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1155644669=0, srv214262466=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,156 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table19) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,156 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table50
2023-07-17 21:53:12,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1155644669=0, srv214262466=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,156 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table50) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,156 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table51
2023-07-17 21:53:12,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1155644669=0, srv214262466=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,157 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table51) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,157 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table52
2023-07-17 21:53:12,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1155644669=0, srv214262466=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,157 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table52) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,157 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table10
2023-07-17 21:53:12,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1155644669=0, srv214262466=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,158 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table10) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,158 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table11
2023-07-17 21:53:12,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1155644669=0, srv214262466=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,158 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table11) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,158 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table12
2023-07-17 21:53:12,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1155644669=0, srv214262466=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,159 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table12) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,159 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table46
2023-07-17 21:53:12,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1155644669=0, srv214262466=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,159 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table46) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,159 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table47
2023-07-17 21:53:12,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1155644669=0, srv214262466=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,160 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table47) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,160 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table48
2023-07-17 21:53:12,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1155644669=0, srv214262466=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,160 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table48) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,160 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table49
2023-07-17 21:53:12,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1155644669=0, srv214262466=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,161 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table49) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,161 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table40
2023-07-17 21:53:12,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1155644669=0, srv214262466=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,161 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table40) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,161 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table41
2023-07-17 21:53:12,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1155644669=0, srv214262466=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,161 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table41) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,162 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table42
2023-07-17 21:53:12,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1155644669=0, srv214262466=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,162 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table42) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,162 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table43
2023-07-17 21:53:12,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1155644669=0, srv214262466=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,162 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table43) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,162 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table44
2023-07-17 21:53:12,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1155644669=0, srv214262466=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,163 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table44) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,163 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table45
2023-07-17 21:53:12,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1155644669=0, srv214262466=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,163 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table45) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,163 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table35
2023-07-17 21:53:12,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1155644669=0, srv214262466=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,164 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table35) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,164 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table36
2023-07-17 21:53:12,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1155644669=0, srv214262466=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,164 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table36) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,164 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table37
2023-07-17 21:53:12,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1155644669=0, srv214262466=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,165 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table37) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,165 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table38
2023-07-17 21:53:12,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1155644669=0, srv214262466=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,165 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table38) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,165 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table39
2023-07-17 21:53:12,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1155644669=0, srv214262466=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,165 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table39) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,166 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1155644669=0, srv214262466=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,166 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,166 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1155644669=0, srv214262466=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,166 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,167 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1155644669=0, srv214262466=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,167 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,167 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1155644669=0, srv214262466=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,167 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,168 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1155644669=0, srv214262466=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,168 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,168 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1155644669=0, srv214262466=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,168 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,169 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table30
2023-07-17 21:53:12,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1155644669=0, srv214262466=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,169 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table30) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,169 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table9
2023-07-17 21:53:12,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1155644669=0, srv214262466=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,169 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table9) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,170 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table31
2023-07-17 21:53:12,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1155644669=0, srv214262466=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,170 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table31) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,170 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table8
2023-07-17 21:53:12,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1155644669=0, srv214262466=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,170 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table8) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,171 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table32
2023-07-17 21:53:12,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1155644669=0, srv214262466=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,171 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table32) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,171 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-17 21:53:12,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1155644669=0, srv214262466=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,171 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,172 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table33
2023-07-17 21:53:12,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1155644669=0, srv214262466=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,172 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table33) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,172 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-17 21:53:12,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1155644669=0, srv214262466=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,173 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,173 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table34
2023-07-17 21:53:12,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1155644669=0, srv214262466=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,173 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table34) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,173 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table24
2023-07-17 21:53:12,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1155644669=0, srv214262466=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,174 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table24) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,174 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table25
2023-07-17 21:53:12,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1155644669=0, srv214262466=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,174 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table25) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,174 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table26
2023-07-17 21:53:12,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1155644669=0, srv214262466=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,175 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table26) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,175 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table27
2023-07-17 21:53:12,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1155644669=0, srv214262466=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,175 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table27) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,175 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table28
2023-07-17 21:53:12,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1155644669=0, srv214262466=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,176 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table28) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,176 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table29
2023-07-17 21:53:12,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1155644669=0, srv214262466=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,176 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table29) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,176 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table20
2023-07-17 21:53:12,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1155644669=0, srv214262466=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,177 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table20) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,177 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table21
2023-07-17 21:53:12,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1155644669=0, srv214262466=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,177 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table21) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,177 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table22
2023-07-17 21:53:12,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1155644669=0, srv214262466=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,178 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table22) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,178 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table23
2023-07-17 21:53:12,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1155644669=0, srv214262466=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,178 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table23) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,178 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv972278736=2, srv1997508551=1, srv1828901285=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,179 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,179 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv972278736=2, srv1997508551=1, srv1828901285=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,180 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,180 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv809355401=2, srv1337999580=0, srv1673923786=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,180 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,180 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv809355401=2, srv1337999580=0, srv1673923786=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,181 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,181 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv809355401=2, srv1337999580=0, srv1673923786=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,182 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,182 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1981672718=0, srv574540051=1, srv617063825=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,182 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,182 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1981672718=0, srv574540051=1, srv617063825=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,183 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,183 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1420176265=1, srv106404895=0, srv515711583=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,184 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,184 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1420176265=1, srv106404895=0, srv515711583=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,184 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,184 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1420176265=1, srv106404895=0, srv515711583=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,185 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,185 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv659500505=2, srv338301988=1, srv1963618771=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,185 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,185 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv659500505=2, srv338301988=1, srv1963618771=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,186 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,186 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv659500505=2, srv338301988=1, srv1963618771=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,186 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,186 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv659500505=2, srv338301988=1, srv1963618771=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,187 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,187 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table13
2023-07-17 21:53:12,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv578928354=2, srv1715464674=0, srv497338284=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,188 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table13) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,188 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table14
2023-07-17 21:53:12,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv578928354=2, srv1715464674=0, srv497338284=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,188 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table14) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,188 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table15
2023-07-17 21:53:12,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv578928354=2, srv1715464674=0, srv497338284=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,189 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table15) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,189 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table16
2023-07-17 21:53:12,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv578928354=2, srv1715464674=0, srv497338284=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,189 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table16) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,189 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table17
2023-07-17 21:53:12,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv578928354=2, srv1715464674=0, srv497338284=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,190 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table17) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,190 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table18
2023-07-17 21:53:12,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv578928354=2, srv1715464674=0, srv497338284=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,190 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table18) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,191 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table19
2023-07-17 21:53:12,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv578928354=2, srv1715464674=0, srv497338284=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,191 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table19) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,191 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv578928354=2, srv1715464674=0, srv497338284=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,191 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,192 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv578928354=2, srv1715464674=0, srv497338284=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,192 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,192 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv578928354=2, srv1715464674=0, srv497338284=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,192 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,193 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv578928354=2, srv1715464674=0, srv497338284=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,193 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,193 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv578928354=2, srv1715464674=0, srv497338284=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,193 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,194 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv578928354=2, srv1715464674=0, srv497338284=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,194 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,194 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table9
2023-07-17 21:53:12,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv578928354=2, srv1715464674=0, srv497338284=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,195 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table9) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,195 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table8
2023-07-17 21:53:12,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv578928354=2, srv1715464674=0, srv497338284=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,195 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table8) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,195 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table10
2023-07-17 21:53:12,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv578928354=2, srv1715464674=0, srv497338284=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,196 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table10) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,196 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-17 21:53:12,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv578928354=2, srv1715464674=0, srv497338284=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,196 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,196 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table11
2023-07-17 21:53:12,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv578928354=2, srv1715464674=0, srv497338284=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,197 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table11) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,197 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-17 21:53:12,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv578928354=2, srv1715464674=0, srv497338284=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,197 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,197 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table12
2023-07-17 21:53:12,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv578928354=2, srv1715464674=0, srv497338284=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,198 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table12) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,198 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv505267874=2, srv1514739625=0, srv18087852=1, srv543394746=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,198 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,198 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv505267874=2, srv1514739625=0, srv18087852=1, srv543394746=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,199 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,199 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv505267874=2, srv1514739625=0, srv18087852=1, srv543394746=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,199 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,200 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv174824213=0, srv383198159=3, srv2010197683=2, srv1861434651=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,200 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,200 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv174824213=0, srv383198159=3, srv2010197683=2, srv1861434651=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,201 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,201 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv174824213=0, srv383198159=3, srv2010197683=2, srv1861434651=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,201 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,201 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv174824213=0, srv383198159=3, srv2010197683=2, srv1861434651=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,202 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,202 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv62432079=2, srv2132959880=1, srv631141376=3, srv1395963405=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,203 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,203 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv62432079=2, srv2132959880=1, srv631141376=3, srv1395963405=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,203 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,203 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv62432079=2, srv2132959880=1, srv631141376=3, srv1395963405=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,204 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,204 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv62432079=2, srv2132959880=1, srv631141376=3, srv1395963405=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,205 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,205 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv62432079=2, srv2132959880=1, srv631141376=3, srv1395963405=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,205 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,206 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv13022008=0, srv301135472=3, srv1788066976=1, srv1936927542=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,206 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,206 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv13022008=0, srv301135472=3, srv1788066976=1, srv1936927542=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,207 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,207 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv13022008=0, srv301135472=3, srv1788066976=1, srv1936927542=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,207 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,207 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv13022008=0, srv301135472=3, srv1788066976=1, srv1936927542=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,208 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,208 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv13022008=0, srv301135472=3, srv1788066976=1, srv1936927542=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,209 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,209 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv13022008=0, srv301135472=3, srv1788066976=1, srv1936927542=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,209 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,209 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv332375878=0, srv994961688=3, srv74557709=1, srv793202644=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,210 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,210 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv332375878=0, srv994961688=3, srv74557709=1, srv793202644=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,211 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,211 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv332375878=0, srv994961688=3, srv74557709=1, srv793202644=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,211 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,211 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv332375878=0, srv994961688=3, srv74557709=1, srv793202644=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,212 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,212 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv332375878=0, srv994961688=3, srv74557709=1, srv793202644=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,212 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,212 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv332375878=0, srv994961688=3, srv74557709=1, srv793202644=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,213 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,213 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1833978933=1, srv899227324=3, srv1017965415=0, srv659264070=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,214 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,214 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1833978933=1, srv899227324=3, srv1017965415=0, srv659264070=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,214 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,214 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1833978933=1, srv899227324=3, srv1017965415=0, srv659264070=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,215 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,215 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1833978933=1, srv899227324=3, srv1017965415=0, srv659264070=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,216 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,216 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1833978933=1, srv899227324=3, srv1017965415=0, srv659264070=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,216 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,216 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1833978933=1, srv899227324=3, srv1017965415=0, srv659264070=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,217 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,217 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1838459943=2, srv1541649433=1, srv185161195=3, srv1015479812=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,217 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,218 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1838459943=2, srv1541649433=1, srv185161195=3, srv1015479812=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,218 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,218 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1838459943=2, srv1541649433=1, srv185161195=3, srv1015479812=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,219 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,219 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1838459943=2, srv1541649433=1, srv185161195=3, srv1015479812=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,219 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,219 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1838459943=2, srv1541649433=1, srv185161195=3, srv1015479812=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,220 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,220 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1838459943=2, srv1541649433=1, srv185161195=3, srv1015479812=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,220 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,221 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1420428673=0, srv77496933=3, srv1723943945=2, srv1619753205=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,221 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,221 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1420428673=0, srv77496933=3, srv1723943945=2, srv1619753205=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,222 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,222 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1420428673=0, srv77496933=3, srv1723943945=2, srv1619753205=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,223 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,223 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1420428673=0, srv77496933=3, srv1723943945=2, srv1619753205=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,223 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,223 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1420428673=0, srv77496933=3, srv1723943945=2, srv1619753205=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,224 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,224 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1420428673=0, srv77496933=3, srv1723943945=2, srv1619753205=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,224 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,224 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-17 21:53:12,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1420428673=0, srv77496933=3, srv1723943945=2, srv1619753205=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,225 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,225 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1599121999=1, srv1658149593=2, srv1690150626=3, srv1173267178=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,226 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,226 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1599121999=1, srv1658149593=2, srv1690150626=3, srv1173267178=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,226 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,226 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1599121999=1, srv1658149593=2, srv1690150626=3, srv1173267178=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,227 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,227 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1599121999=1, srv1658149593=2, srv1690150626=3, srv1173267178=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,227 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,228 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1599121999=1, srv1658149593=2, srv1690150626=3, srv1173267178=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,228 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,228 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1599121999=1, srv1658149593=2, srv1690150626=3, srv1173267178=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,229 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,229 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-17 21:53:12,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1599121999=1, srv1658149593=2, srv1690150626=3, srv1173267178=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,229 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,229 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-17 21:53:12,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1599121999=1, srv1658149593=2, srv1690150626=3, srv1173267178=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,230 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,230 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1624805481=0, srv832400507=3, srv1906242860=1, srv2136964435=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,231 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,231 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1624805481=0, srv832400507=3, srv1906242860=1, srv2136964435=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,231 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,231 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1624805481=0, srv832400507=3, srv1906242860=1, srv2136964435=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,232 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,232 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1624805481=0, srv832400507=3, srv1906242860=1, srv2136964435=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,232 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,232 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1624805481=0, srv832400507=3, srv1906242860=1, srv2136964435=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,233 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,233 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1624805481=0, srv832400507=3, srv1906242860=1, srv2136964435=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,234 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,234 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-17 21:53:12,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1624805481=0, srv832400507=3, srv1906242860=1, srv2136964435=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,234 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,234 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1819712393=1, srv536410980=3, srv772170120=4, srv1999662202=2, srv1057353035=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=5, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,235 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,235 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1819712393=1, srv536410980=3, srv772170120=4, srv1999662202=2, srv1057353035=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=5, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,236 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,236 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1819712393=1, srv536410980=3, srv772170120=4, srv1999662202=2, srv1057353035=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=5, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,236 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,236 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1819712393=1, srv536410980=3, srv772170120=4, srv1999662202=2, srv1057353035=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=5, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,237 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,291 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1380
2023-07-17 21:53:12,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,292 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1380) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,292 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1381
2023-07-17 21:53:12,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,293 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1381) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,293 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table880
2023-07-17 21:53:12,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,294 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table880) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,294 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1140
2023-07-17 21:53:12,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,295 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1140) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,295 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1382
2023-07-17 21:53:12,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,296 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1382) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,296 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table881
2023-07-17 21:53:12,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,296 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table881) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,296 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1141
2023-07-17 21:53:12,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,297 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1141) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,297 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1383
2023-07-17 21:53:12,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,298 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1383) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,298 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table640
2023-07-17 21:53:12,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,298 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table640) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,299 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table882
2023-07-17 21:53:12,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,299 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table882) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,299 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1142
2023-07-17 21:53:12,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,300 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1142) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,300 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1384
2023-07-17 21:53:12,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,301 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1384) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,301 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table641
2023-07-17 21:53:12,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,301 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table641) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,301 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table883
2023-07-17 21:53:12,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,302 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table883) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,302 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1143
2023-07-17 21:53:12,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,303 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1143) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,303 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1385
2023-07-17 21:53:12,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,304 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1385) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,304 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table400
2023-07-17 21:53:12,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,304 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table400) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,305 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table642
2023-07-17 21:53:12,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,305 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table642) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,305 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table884
2023-07-17 21:53:12,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,306 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table884) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,306 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1144
2023-07-17 21:53:12,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,307 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1144) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,307 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1386
2023-07-17 21:53:12,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,307 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1386) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,308 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table401
2023-07-17 21:53:12,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,309 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table401) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,309 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table643
2023-07-17 21:53:12,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,309 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table643) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,309 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table885
2023-07-17 21:53:12,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,310 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table885) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,310 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1145
2023-07-17 21:53:12,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,311 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1145) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,311 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1387
2023-07-17 21:53:12,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,312 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1387) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,312 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table402
2023-07-17 21:53:12,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,312 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table402) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,312 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table644
2023-07-17 21:53:12,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,313 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table644) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,313 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table886
2023-07-17 21:53:12,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,314 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table886) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,314 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table403
2023-07-17 21:53:12,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,315 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table403) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,315 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table645
2023-07-17 21:53:12,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,316 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table645) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,316 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table887
2023-07-17 21:53:12,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,316 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table887) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,316 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table404
2023-07-17 21:53:12,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,317 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table404) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,317 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table646
2023-07-17 21:53:12,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,318 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table646) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,318 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table888
2023-07-17 21:53:12,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,319 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table888) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,319 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table405
2023-07-17 21:53:12,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,319 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table405) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,319 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table647
2023-07-17 21:53:12,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,320 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table647) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,320 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table889
2023-07-17 21:53:12,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,321 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table889) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,321 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table406
2023-07-17 21:53:12,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,321 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table406) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,321 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table648
2023-07-17 21:53:12,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,322 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table648) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,322 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table407
2023-07-17 21:53:12,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,323 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table407) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,323 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table649
2023-07-17 21:53:12,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,323 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table649) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,324 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table408
2023-07-17 21:53:12,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,324 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table408) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,324 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table409
2023-07-17 21:53:12,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,325 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table409) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,325 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1146
2023-07-17 21:53:12,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,326 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1146) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,326 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1388
2023-07-17 21:53:12,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,327 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1388) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,327 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1147
2023-07-17 21:53:12,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,327 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1147) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,327 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1389
2023-07-17 21:53:12,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,328 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1389) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,328 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1148
2023-07-17 21:53:12,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,329 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1148) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,329 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1149
2023-07-17 21:53:12,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,329 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1149) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,329 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1370
2023-07-17 21:53:12,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,330 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1370) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,330 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1371
2023-07-17 21:53:12,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,331 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1371) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,331 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table870
2023-07-17 21:53:12,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,331 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table870) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,331 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1130
2023-07-17 21:53:12,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,332 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1130) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,332 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1372
2023-07-17 21:53:12,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,333 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1372) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,333 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table871
2023-07-17 21:53:12,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,333 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table871) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,333 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1131
2023-07-17 21:53:12,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,334 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1131) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,334 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1373
2023-07-17 21:53:12,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,335 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1373) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,335 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table630
2023-07-17 21:53:12,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,336 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table630) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,336 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table872
2023-07-17 21:53:12,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,336 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table872) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,336 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1132
2023-07-17 21:53:12,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,337 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1132) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,337 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1374
2023-07-17 21:53:12,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,338 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1374) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,338 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table631
2023-07-17 21:53:12,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,338 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table631) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,338 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table873
2023-07-17 21:53:12,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,339 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table873) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,339 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1133
2023-07-17 21:53:12,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,340 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1133) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,340 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1375
2023-07-17 21:53:12,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,340 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1375) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,341 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table632
2023-07-17 21:53:12,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,341 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table632) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,341 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table874
2023-07-17 21:53:12,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,342 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table874) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,342 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1134
2023-07-17 21:53:12,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,343 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1134) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,343 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1376
2023-07-17 21:53:12,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,343 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1376) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,343 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table633
2023-07-17 21:53:12,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,344 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table633) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,344 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table875
2023-07-17 21:53:12,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,345 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table875) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,345 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table634
2023-07-17 21:53:12,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,345 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table634) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,345 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table876
2023-07-17 21:53:12,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,346 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table876) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,346 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table635
2023-07-17 21:53:12,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,347 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table635) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,347 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table877
2023-07-17 21:53:12,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,347 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table877) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,347 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table636
2023-07-17 21:53:12,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,348 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table636) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,348 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table878
2023-07-17 21:53:12,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,349 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table878) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,349 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table637
2023-07-17 21:53:12,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,349 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table637) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,349 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table879
2023-07-17 21:53:12,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,350 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table879) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,350 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table638
2023-07-17 21:53:12,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,351 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table638) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,351 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table639
2023-07-17 21:53:12,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,352 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table639) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,352 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1135
2023-07-17 21:53:12,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,352 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1135) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,352 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1377
2023-07-17 21:53:12,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,353 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1377) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,353 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1136
2023-07-17 21:53:12,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,354 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1136) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,354 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1378
2023-07-17 21:53:12,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,354 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1378) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,354 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1137
2023-07-17 21:53:12,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,355 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1137) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,355 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1379
2023-07-17 21:53:12,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,356 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1379) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,356 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1138
2023-07-17 21:53:12,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,357 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1138) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,357 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1139
2023-07-17 21:53:12,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,357 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1139) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,357 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table660
2023-07-17 21:53:12,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,358 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table660) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,358 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1360
2023-07-17 21:53:12,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,359 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1360) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,359 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table661
2023-07-17 21:53:12,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,359 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table661) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,359 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1361
2023-07-17 21:53:12,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,360 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1361) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,360 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table420
2023-07-17 21:53:12,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,361 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table420) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,361 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table662
2023-07-17 21:53:12,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,361 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table662) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,361 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1120
2023-07-17 21:53:12,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,362 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1120) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,362 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1362
2023-07-17 21:53:12,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,363 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1362) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,363 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table421
2023-07-17 21:53:12,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,363 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table421) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,363 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table663
2023-07-17 21:53:12,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,364 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table663) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,364 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1121
2023-07-17 21:53:12,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,365 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1121) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,365 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1363
2023-07-17 21:53:12,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,365 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1363) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,366 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table422
2023-07-17 21:53:12,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,366 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table422) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,366 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table664
2023-07-17 21:53:12,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,367 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table664) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,367 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1122
2023-07-17 21:53:12,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,368 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1122) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,368 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1364
2023-07-17 21:53:12,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,368 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1364) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,368 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table423
2023-07-17 21:53:12,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,369 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table423) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,369 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table665
2023-07-17 21:53:12,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,370 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table665) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,370 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1123
2023-07-17 21:53:12,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,370 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1123) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,370 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1365
2023-07-17 21:53:12,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,371 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1365) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,371 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table424
2023-07-17 21:53:12,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,372 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table424) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,372 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table666
2023-07-17 21:53:12,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,373 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table666) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,373 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table425
2023-07-17 21:53:12,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,373 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table425) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,373 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table667
2023-07-17 21:53:12,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,374 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table667) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,374 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table426
2023-07-17 21:53:12,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,375 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table426) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,375 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table668
2023-07-17 21:53:12,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,375 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table668) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,375 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table427
2023-07-17 21:53:12,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,376 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table427) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,376 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table669
2023-07-17 21:53:12,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,377 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table669) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,377 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table428
2023-07-17 21:53:12,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,377 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table428) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,378 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table429
2023-07-17 21:53:12,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,378 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table429) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,378 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1124
2023-07-17 21:53:12,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,379 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1124) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,379 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1366
2023-07-17 21:53:12,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,379 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1366) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,380 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1125
2023-07-17 21:53:12,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,380 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1125) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,380 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1367
2023-07-17 21:53:12,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,381 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1367) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,381 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1126
2023-07-17 21:53:12,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,382 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1126) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,382 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1368
2023-07-17 21:53:12,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,382 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1368) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,382 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1127
2023-07-17 21:53:12,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,383 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1127) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,383 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1369
2023-07-17 21:53:12,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,384 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1369) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,384 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1128
2023-07-17 21:53:12,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,384 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1128) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,384 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1129
2023-07-17 21:53:12,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,385 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1129) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,385 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table890
2023-07-17 21:53:12,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,386 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table890) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,386 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table891
2023-07-17 21:53:12,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,386 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table891) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,387 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table650
2023-07-17 21:53:12,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,387 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table650) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,387 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table892
2023-07-17 21:53:12,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,388 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table892) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,388 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1350
2023-07-17 21:53:12,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,389 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1350) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,389 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table651
2023-07-17 21:53:12,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,389 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table651) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,389 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table893
2023-07-17 21:53:12,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,390 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table893) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,390 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1351
2023-07-17 21:53:12,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,391 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1351) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,391 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table410
2023-07-17 21:53:12,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,391 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table410) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,391 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table652
2023-07-17 21:53:12,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,392 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table652) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,392 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table894
2023-07-17 21:53:12,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,393 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table894) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,393 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1110
2023-07-17 21:53:12,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,393 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1110) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,393 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1352
2023-07-17 21:53:12,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,394 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1352) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,394 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table411
2023-07-17 21:53:12,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,396 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table411) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,396 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table653
2023-07-17 21:53:12,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,396 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table653) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,396 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table895
2023-07-17 21:53:12,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,397 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table895) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,397 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1111
2023-07-17 21:53:12,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,398 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1111) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,398 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1353
2023-07-17 21:53:12,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,398 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1353) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,398 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table412
2023-07-17 21:53:12,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,399 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table412) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,399 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table654
2023-07-17 21:53:12,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,400 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table654) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,400 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table896
2023-07-17 21:53:12,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,400 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table896) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,400 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1112
2023-07-17 21:53:12,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,401 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1112) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,401 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1354
2023-07-17 21:53:12,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,402 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1354) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,402 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table413
2023-07-17 21:53:12,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,402 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table413) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,403 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table655
2023-07-17 21:53:12,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,403 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table655) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,403 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table897
2023-07-17 21:53:12,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,404 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table897) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,404 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table414
2023-07-17 21:53:12,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,405 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table414) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,405 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table656
2023-07-17 21:53:12,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,405 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table656) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,405 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table898
2023-07-17 21:53:12,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,406 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table898) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,406 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table415
2023-07-17 21:53:12,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,407 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table415) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,407 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table657
2023-07-17 21:53:12,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,407 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table657) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,407 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table899
2023-07-17 21:53:12,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,408 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table899) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,408 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table416
2023-07-17 21:53:12,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,409 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table416) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,409 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table658
2023-07-17 21:53:12,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,409 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table658) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,410 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table417
2023-07-17 21:53:12,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,410 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table417) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,410 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table659
2023-07-17 21:53:12,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,411 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table659) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,411 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table418
2023-07-17 21:53:12,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,412 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table418) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,412 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table419
2023-07-17 21:53:12,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,412 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table419) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,412 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1113
2023-07-17 21:53:12,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,413 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1113) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,413 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1355
2023-07-17 21:53:12,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,414 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1355) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,414 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1114
2023-07-17 21:53:12,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,414 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1114) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,414 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1356
2023-07-17 21:53:12,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,415 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1356) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,415 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1115
2023-07-17 21:53:12,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,416 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1115) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,416 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1357
2023-07-17 21:53:12,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,416 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1357) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,416 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1116
2023-07-17 21:53:12,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,417 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1116) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,417 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1358
2023-07-17 21:53:12,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,418 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1358) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,418 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1117
2023-07-17 21:53:12,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,419 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1117) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,419 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1359
2023-07-17 21:53:12,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,419 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1359) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,419 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1118
2023-07-17 21:53:12,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,420 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1118) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,420 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1119
2023-07-17 21:53:12,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,421 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1119) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,421 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1182
2023-07-17 21:53:12,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,421 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1182) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,421 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1183
2023-07-17 21:53:12,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,422 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1183) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,422 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1184
2023-07-17 21:53:12,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,423 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1184) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,423 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1185
2023-07-17 21:53:12,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,423 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1185) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,423 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1186
2023-07-17 21:53:12,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,424 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1186) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,424 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1187
2023-07-17 21:53:12,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,425 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1187) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,425 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table840
2023-07-17 21:53:12,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,425 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table840) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,425 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1188
2023-07-17 21:53:12,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,426 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1188) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,426 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table841
2023-07-17 21:53:12,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,427 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table841) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,427 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1189
2023-07-17 21:53:12,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,427 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1189) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,427 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table600
2023-07-17 21:53:12,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,428 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table600) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,428 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table842
2023-07-17 21:53:12,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,429 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table842) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,429 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table601
2023-07-17 21:53:12,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,429 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table601) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,429 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table843
2023-07-17 21:53:12,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,430 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table843) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,430 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table602
2023-07-17 21:53:12,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,431 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table602) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,431 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table844
2023-07-17 21:53:12,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,431 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table844) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,432 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table603
2023-07-17 21:53:12,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,432 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table603) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,432 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table845
2023-07-17 21:53:12,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,433 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table845) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,433 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table604
2023-07-17 21:53:12,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,434 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table604) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,434 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table846
2023-07-17 21:53:12,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,434 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table846) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,435 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table605
2023-07-17 21:53:12,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,435 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table605) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,435 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table847
2023-07-17 21:53:12,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,436 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table847) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,436 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table606
2023-07-17 21:53:12,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,436 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table606) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,437 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table848
2023-07-17 21:53:12,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,437 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table848) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,437 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1180
2023-07-17 21:53:12,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,438 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1180) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,438 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table607
2023-07-17 21:53:12,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,438 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table607) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,439 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table849
2023-07-17 21:53:12,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,439 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table849) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,439 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1181
2023-07-17 21:53:12,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,440 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1181) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,440 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table608
2023-07-17 21:53:12,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,441 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table608) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,441 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table609
2023-07-17 21:53:12,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,441 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table609) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,441 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1171
2023-07-17 21:53:12,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,442 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1171) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,442 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1172
2023-07-17 21:53:12,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,443 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1172) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,443 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1173
2023-07-17 21:53:12,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,443 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1173) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,443 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1174
2023-07-17 21:53:12,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,444 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1174) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,444 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1175
2023-07-17 21:53:12,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,445 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1175) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,445 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1176
2023-07-17 21:53:12,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,445 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1176) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,445 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1177
2023-07-17 21:53:12,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,446 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1177) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,446 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table830
2023-07-17 21:53:12,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,447 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table830) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,447 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1178
2023-07-17 21:53:12,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,447 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1178) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,447 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table831
2023-07-17 21:53:12,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,448 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table831) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,448 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table832
2023-07-17 21:53:12,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,449 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table832) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,449 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table833
2023-07-17 21:53:12,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,450 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table833) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,450 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table834
2023-07-17 21:53:12,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,450 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table834) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,450 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table835
2023-07-17 21:53:12,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,451 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table835) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,451 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table836
2023-07-17 21:53:12,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,452 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table836) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,452 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table837
2023-07-17 21:53:12,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,452 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table837) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,452 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table838
2023-07-17 21:53:12,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,453 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table838) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,453 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1170
2023-07-17 21:53:12,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,454 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1170) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,454 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table839
2023-07-17 21:53:12,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,454 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table839) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,454 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1179
2023-07-17 21:53:12,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,455 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1179) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,455 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1160
2023-07-17 21:53:12,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,456 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1160) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,456 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1161
2023-07-17 21:53:12,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,456 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1161) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,456 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1162
2023-07-17 21:53:12,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,457 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1162) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,457 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1163
2023-07-17 21:53:12,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,458 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1163) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,458 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table860
2023-07-17 21:53:12,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,458 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table860) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,458 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1164
2023-07-17 21:53:12,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,459 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1164) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,459 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table861
2023-07-17 21:53:12,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,460 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table861) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,460 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1165
2023-07-17 21:53:12,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,460 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1165) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,460 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table620
2023-07-17 21:53:12,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,461 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table620) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,461 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table862
2023-07-17 21:53:12,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,462 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table862) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,462 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1166
2023-07-17 21:53:12,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,462 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1166) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,462 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table621
2023-07-17 21:53:12,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,463 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table621) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,463 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table863
2023-07-17 21:53:12,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,464 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table863) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,464 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1167
2023-07-17 21:53:12,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,465 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1167) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,465 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table622
2023-07-17 21:53:12,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,465 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table622) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,465 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table864
2023-07-17 21:53:12,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,466 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table864) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,466 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table623
2023-07-17 21:53:12,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,467 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table623) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,467 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table865
2023-07-17 21:53:12,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,467 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table865) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,467 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table624
2023-07-17 21:53:12,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,468 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table624) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,468 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table866
2023-07-17 21:53:12,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,469 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table866) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,469 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table625
2023-07-17 21:53:12,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,469 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table625) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,469 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table867
2023-07-17 21:53:12,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,470 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table867) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,470 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table626
2023-07-17 21:53:12,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,471 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table626) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,471 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table868
2023-07-17 21:53:12,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,471 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table868) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,471 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table627
2023-07-17 21:53:12,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,472 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table627) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,472 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table869
2023-07-17 21:53:12,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,473 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table869) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,473 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table628
2023-07-17 21:53:12,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,473 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table628) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,473 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table629
2023-07-17 21:53:12,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,474 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table629) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,474 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1168
2023-07-17 21:53:12,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,475 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1168) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,475 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1169
2023-07-17 21:53:12,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,475 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1169) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,475 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1391
2023-07-17 21:53:12,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,476 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1391) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,476 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1150
2023-07-17 21:53:12,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,477 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1150) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,477 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1392
2023-07-17 21:53:12,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,477 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1392) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,477 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1151
2023-07-17 21:53:12,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,478 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1151) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,478 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1393
2023-07-17 21:53:12,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,479 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1393) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,479 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1152
2023-07-17 21:53:12,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,480 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1152) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,480 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1394
2023-07-17 21:53:12,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,480 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1394) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,480 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1153
2023-07-17 21:53:12,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,481 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1153) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,481 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1395
2023-07-17 21:53:12,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,482 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1395) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,482 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table850
2023-07-17 21:53:12,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,482 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table850) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,482 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1154
2023-07-17 21:53:12,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,483 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1154) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,483 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1396
2023-07-17 21:53:12,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,484 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1396) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,484 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table851
2023-07-17 21:53:12,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,484 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table851) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,484 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1155
2023-07-17 21:53:12,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,485 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1155) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,485 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1397
2023-07-17 21:53:12,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,486 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1397) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,486 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table610
2023-07-17 21:53:12,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,486 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table610) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,486 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table852
2023-07-17 21:53:12,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,487 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table852) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,487 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1156
2023-07-17 21:53:12,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,488 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1156) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,488 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1398
2023-07-17 21:53:12,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,488 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1398) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,489 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table611
2023-07-17 21:53:12,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,489 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table611) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,489 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table853
2023-07-17 21:53:12,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,490 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table853) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,490 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table612
2023-07-17 21:53:12,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,490 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table612) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,491 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table854
2023-07-17 21:53:12,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,491 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table854) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,491 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table613
2023-07-17 21:53:12,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,492 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table613) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,492 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table855
2023-07-17 21:53:12,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,493 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table855) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,493 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table614
2023-07-17 21:53:12,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,493 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table614) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,494 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table856
2023-07-17 21:53:12,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,494 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table856) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,494 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table615
2023-07-17 21:53:12,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,495 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table615) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,495 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table857
2023-07-17 21:53:12,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,496 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table857) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,496 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table616
2023-07-17 21:53:12,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,496 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table616) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,496 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table858
2023-07-17 21:53:12,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,497 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table858) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,497 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table617
2023-07-17 21:53:12,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,498 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table617) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,498 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table859
2023-07-17 21:53:12,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,498 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table859) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,498 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table618
2023-07-17 21:53:12,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,499 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table618) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,499 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1390
2023-07-17 21:53:12,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,500 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1390) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,500 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table619
2023-07-17 21:53:12,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,500 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table619) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,500 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1157
2023-07-17 21:53:12,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,501 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1157) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,501 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1399
2023-07-17 21:53:12,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,502 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1399) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,502 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1158
2023-07-17 21:53:12,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,502 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1158) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,502 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1159
2023-07-17 21:53:12,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,503 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1159) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,503 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table240
2023-07-17 21:53:12,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,504 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table240) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,504 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table482
2023-07-17 21:53:12,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,504 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table482) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,505 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table241
2023-07-17 21:53:12,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,505 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table241) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,505 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table483
2023-07-17 21:53:12,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,506 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table483) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,506 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table242
2023-07-17 21:53:12,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,507 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table242) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,507 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table484
2023-07-17 21:53:12,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,507 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table484) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,507 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table243
2023-07-17 21:53:12,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,508 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table243) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,508 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table485
2023-07-17 21:53:12,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,509 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table485) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,509 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table244
2023-07-17 21:53:12,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,510 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table244) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,510 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table486
2023-07-17 21:53:12,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,510 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table486) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,510 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table245
2023-07-17 21:53:12,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,511 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table245) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,511 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table487
2023-07-17 21:53:12,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,512 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table487) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,512 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table246
2023-07-17 21:53:12,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,512 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table246) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,512 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table488
2023-07-17 21:53:12,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,513 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table488) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,513 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table247
2023-07-17 21:53:12,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,514 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table247) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,514 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table489
2023-07-17 21:53:12,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,514 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table489) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,515 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table248
2023-07-17 21:53:12,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,515 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table248) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,515 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table249
2023-07-17 21:53:12,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,516 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table249) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,516 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1308
2023-07-17 21:53:12,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,517 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1308) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,517 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1309
2023-07-17 21:53:12,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,517 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1309) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,517 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1300
2023-07-17 21:53:12,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,518 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1300) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,518 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1301
2023-07-17 21:53:12,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,519 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1301) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,519 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1302
2023-07-17 21:53:12,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,519 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1302) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,519 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1303
2023-07-17 21:53:12,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,520 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1303) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,520 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1304
2023-07-17 21:53:12,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,521 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1304) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,521 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table490
2023-07-17 21:53:12,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,521 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table490) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,521 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1305
2023-07-17 21:53:12,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,522 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1305) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,522 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table491
2023-07-17 21:53:12,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,523 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table491) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,523 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1306
2023-07-17 21:53:12,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,523 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1306) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,524 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table250
2023-07-17 21:53:12,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,524 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table250) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,525 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table492
2023-07-17 21:53:12,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,525 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table492) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,525 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1307
2023-07-17 21:53:12,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,526 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1307) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,526 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table471
2023-07-17 21:53:12,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,527 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table471) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,527 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table230
2023-07-17 21:53:12,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,527 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table230) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,527 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table472
2023-07-17 21:53:12,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,528 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table472) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,528 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table231
2023-07-17 21:53:12,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,529 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table231) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,529 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table473
2023-07-17 21:53:12,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,529 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table473) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,530 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table232
2023-07-17 21:53:12,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,530 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table232) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,530 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table474
2023-07-17 21:53:12,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,531 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table474) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,531 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table233
2023-07-17 21:53:12,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,532 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table233) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,532 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table475
2023-07-17 21:53:12,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,532 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table475) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,532 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table234
2023-07-17 21:53:12,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,533 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table234) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,533 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table476
2023-07-17 21:53:12,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,534 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table476) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,534 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table235
2023-07-17 21:53:12,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,534 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table235) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,535 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table477
2023-07-17 21:53:12,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,535 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table477) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,535 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table236
2023-07-17 21:53:12,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,536 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table236) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,536 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table478
2023-07-17 21:53:12,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,537 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table478) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,537 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table237
2023-07-17 21:53:12,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,537 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table237) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,537 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table479
2023-07-17 21:53:12,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,538 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table479) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,538 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table238
2023-07-17 21:53:12,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,539 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table238) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,539 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table239
2023-07-17 21:53:12,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,539 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table239) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,539 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table480
2023-07-17 21:53:12,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,540 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table480) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,541 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table481
2023-07-17 21:53:12,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,541 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table481) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,541 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table262
2023-07-17 21:53:12,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,542 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table262) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,542 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table263
2023-07-17 21:53:12,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,543 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table263) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,543 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table264
2023-07-17 21:53:12,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,544 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table264) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,544 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table265
2023-07-17 21:53:12,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,544 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table265) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,544 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table266
2023-07-17 21:53:12,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,545 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table266) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,545 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table267
2023-07-17 21:53:12,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,546 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table267) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,546 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table268
2023-07-17 21:53:12,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,546 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table268) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,547 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table269
2023-07-17 21:53:12,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,547 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table269) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,547 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table270
2023-07-17 21:53:12,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,548 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table270) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,548 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table271
2023-07-17 21:53:12,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,549 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table271) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,549 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table272
2023-07-17 21:53:12,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,549 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table272) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,549 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table251
2023-07-17 21:53:12,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,550 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table251) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,550 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table493
2023-07-17 21:53:12,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,551 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table493) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,551 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table252
2023-07-17 21:53:12,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,551 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table252) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,551 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table494
2023-07-17 21:53:12,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,552 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table494) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,552 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table253
2023-07-17 21:53:12,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,553 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table253) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,553 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table495
2023-07-17 21:53:12,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,554 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table495) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,554 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table254
2023-07-17 21:53:12,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,555 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table254) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,555 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table496
2023-07-17 21:53:12,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,555 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table496) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,555 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table255
2023-07-17 21:53:12,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,556 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table255) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,556 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table497
2023-07-17 21:53:12,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,557 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table497) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,557 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table256
2023-07-17 21:53:12,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,558 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table256) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,558 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table498
2023-07-17 21:53:12,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,558 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table498) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,559 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table257
2023-07-17 21:53:12,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,559 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table257) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,559 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table499
2023-07-17 21:53:12,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,560 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table499) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,560 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table258
2023-07-17 21:53:12,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,561 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table258) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,561 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table259
2023-07-17 21:53:12,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,561 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table259) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,561 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table260
2023-07-17 21:53:12,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,562 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table260) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,562 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table261
2023-07-17 21:53:12,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,563 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table261) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,563 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table680
2023-07-17 21:53:12,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,563 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table680) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,563 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table681
2023-07-17 21:53:12,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,564 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table681) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,564 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table440
2023-07-17 21:53:12,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,565 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table440) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,565 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table682
2023-07-17 21:53:12,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,566 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table682) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,566 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table441
2023-07-17 21:53:12,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,567 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table441) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,567 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table683
2023-07-17 21:53:12,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,567 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table683) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,567 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table200
2023-07-17 21:53:12,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,568 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table200) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,568 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table442
2023-07-17 21:53:12,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,569 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table442) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,569 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table684
2023-07-17 21:53:12,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,570 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table684) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,570 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1340
2023-07-17 21:53:12,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,570 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1340) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,570 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table201
2023-07-17 21:53:12,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,571 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table201) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,571 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table443
2023-07-17 21:53:12,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,572 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table443) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,572 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table685
2023-07-17 21:53:12,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,572 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table685) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,572 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1341
2023-07-17 21:53:12,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,573 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1341) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,573 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table202
2023-07-17 21:53:12,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,574 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table202) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,574 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table444
2023-07-17 21:53:12,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,575 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table444) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,575 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table686
2023-07-17 21:53:12,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,576 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table686) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,576 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1100
2023-07-17 21:53:12,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,576 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1100) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,576 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1342
2023-07-17 21:53:12,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,577 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1342) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,577 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table203
2023-07-17 21:53:12,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,578 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table203) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,578 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table445
2023-07-17 21:53:12,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,578 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table445) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,578 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table687
2023-07-17 21:53:12,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,579 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table687) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,579 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1101
2023-07-17 21:53:12,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,580 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1101) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,580 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1343
2023-07-17 21:53:12,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,580 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1343) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,580 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table204
2023-07-17 21:53:12,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,581 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table204) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,581 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table446
2023-07-17 21:53:12,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,582 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table446) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,582 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table688
2023-07-17 21:53:12,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,582 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table688) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,582 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table205
2023-07-17 21:53:12,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,583 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table205) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,583 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table447
2023-07-17 21:53:12,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,584 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table447) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,584 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table689
2023-07-17 21:53:12,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,584 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table689) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,584 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table206
2023-07-17 21:53:12,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,585 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table206) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,585 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table448
2023-07-17 21:53:12,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,586 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table448) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,586 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table207
2023-07-17 21:53:12,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,586 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table207) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,587 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table449
2023-07-17 21:53:12,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,587 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table449) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,587 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table208
2023-07-17 21:53:12,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,588 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table208) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,588 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table209
2023-07-17 21:53:12,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,589 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table209) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,589 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1102
2023-07-17 21:53:12,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,589 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1102) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,590 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1344
2023-07-17 21:53:12,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,590 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1344) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,590 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1103
2023-07-17 21:53:12,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,591 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1103) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,591 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1345
2023-07-17 21:53:12,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,591 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1345) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,592 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1104
2023-07-17 21:53:12,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,592 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1104) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,592 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1346
2023-07-17 21:53:12,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,593 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1346) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,593 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1105
2023-07-17 21:53:12,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,593 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1105) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,593 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1347
2023-07-17 21:53:12,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,594 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1347) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,594 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1106
2023-07-17 21:53:12,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,595 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1106) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,595 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1348
2023-07-17 21:53:12,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,595 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1348) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,595 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1107
2023-07-17 21:53:12,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,596 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1107) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,596 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1349
2023-07-17 21:53:12,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,597 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1349) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,597 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1108
2023-07-17 21:53:12,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,597 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1108) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,597 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table690
2023-07-17 21:53:12,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,598 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table690) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,598 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1109
2023-07-17 21:53:12,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,599 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1109) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,599 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table670
2023-07-17 21:53:12,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,599 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table670) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,599 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table671
2023-07-17 21:53:12,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,600 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table671) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,600 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table430
2023-07-17 21:53:12,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,601 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table430) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,601 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table672
2023-07-17 21:53:12,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,601 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table672) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,601 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table431
2023-07-17 21:53:12,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,602 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table431) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,602 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table673
2023-07-17 21:53:12,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,603 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table673) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,603 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table432
2023-07-17 21:53:12,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,603 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table432) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,604 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table674
2023-07-17 21:53:12,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,604 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table674) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,604 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1330
2023-07-17 21:53:12,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,605 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1330) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,605 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table433
2023-07-17 21:53:12,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,605 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table433) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,606 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table675
2023-07-17 21:53:12,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,606 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table675) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,606 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1331
2023-07-17 21:53:12,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,607 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1331) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,607 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table434
2023-07-17 21:53:12,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,608 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table434) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,608 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table676
2023-07-17 21:53:12,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,609 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table676) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,609 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1332
2023-07-17 21:53:12,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,609 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1332) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,610 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table435
2023-07-17 21:53:12,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,610 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table435) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,610 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table677
2023-07-17 21:53:12,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,611 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table677) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,611 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table436
2023-07-17 21:53:12,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,611 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table436) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,612 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table678
2023-07-17 21:53:12,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,612 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table678) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,612 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table437
2023-07-17 21:53:12,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,613 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table437) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,613 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table679
2023-07-17 21:53:12,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,613 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table679) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,614 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table438
2023-07-17 21:53:12,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,614 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table438) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,614 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table439
2023-07-17 21:53:12,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,615 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table439) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,615 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1333
2023-07-17 21:53:12,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,615 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1333) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,616 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1334
2023-07-17 21:53:12,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,616 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1334) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,616 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1335
2023-07-17 21:53:12,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,617 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1335) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,617 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1336
2023-07-17 21:53:12,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,617 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1336) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,617 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1337
2023-07-17 21:53:12,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,618 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1337) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,618 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1338
2023-07-17 21:53:12,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,619 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1338) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,619 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1339
2023-07-17 21:53:12,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,620 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1339) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,620 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table460
2023-07-17 21:53:12,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,620 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table460) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,620 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table461
2023-07-17 21:53:12,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,621 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table461) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,621 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table220
2023-07-17 21:53:12,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,622 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table220) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,622 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table462
2023-07-17 21:53:12,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,622 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table462) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,622 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table221
2023-07-17 21:53:12,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,623 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table221) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,623 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table463
2023-07-17 21:53:12,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,624 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table463) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,624 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table222
2023-07-17 21:53:12,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,624 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table222) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,624 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table464
2023-07-17 21:53:12,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,625 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table464) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,625 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table223
2023-07-17 21:53:12,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,626 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table223) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,626 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table465
2023-07-17 21:53:12,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,626 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table465) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,626 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table224
2023-07-17 21:53:12,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,627 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table224) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,627 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table466
2023-07-17 21:53:12,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,628 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table466) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,628 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1320
2023-07-17 21:53:12,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,628 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1320) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,628 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table225
2023-07-17 21:53:12,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,629 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table225) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,629 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table467
2023-07-17 21:53:12,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,630 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table467) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,630 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1321
2023-07-17 21:53:12,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,630 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1321) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,630 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table226
2023-07-17 21:53:12,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,631 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table226) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,631 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table468
2023-07-17 21:53:12,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,632 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table468) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,632 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table227
2023-07-17 21:53:12,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,632 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table227) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,632 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table469
2023-07-17 21:53:12,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,633 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table469) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,633 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table228
2023-07-17 21:53:12,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,634 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table228) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,634 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table229
2023-07-17 21:53:12,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,635 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table229) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,635 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1322
2023-07-17 21:53:12,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,635 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1322) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,635 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1323
2023-07-17 21:53:12,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,636 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1323) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,636 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1324
2023-07-17 21:53:12,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,637 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1324) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,637 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1325
2023-07-17 21:53:12,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,637 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1325) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,637 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1326
2023-07-17 21:53:12,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,638 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1326) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,638 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1327
2023-07-17 21:53:12,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,639 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1327) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,639 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1328
2023-07-17 21:53:12,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,639 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1328) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,639 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table470
2023-07-17 21:53:12,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,640 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table470) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,640 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1329
2023-07-17 21:53:12,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,641 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1329) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,641 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table691
2023-07-17 21:53:12,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,641 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table691) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,641 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table450
2023-07-17 21:53:12,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,642 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table450) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,642 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table692
2023-07-17 21:53:12,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,643 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table692) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,643 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table451
2023-07-17 21:53:12,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,643 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table451) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,643 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table693
2023-07-17 21:53:12,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,644 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table693) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,644 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table210
2023-07-17 21:53:12,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,645 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table210) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,645 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table452
2023-07-17 21:53:12,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,646 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table452) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,646 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table694
2023-07-17 21:53:12,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,646 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table694) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,646 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table211
2023-07-17 21:53:12,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,647 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table211) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,647 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table453
2023-07-17 21:53:12,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,648 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table453) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,648 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table695
2023-07-17 21:53:12,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,649 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table695) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,649 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table212
2023-07-17 21:53:12,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,649 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table212) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,650 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table454
2023-07-17 21:53:12,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,650 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table454) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,650 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table696
2023-07-17 21:53:12,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,651 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table696) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,651 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table213
2023-07-17 21:53:12,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,652 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table213) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,652 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table455
2023-07-17 21:53:12,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,652 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table455) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,653 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table697
2023-07-17 21:53:12,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,653 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table697) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,653 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table214
2023-07-17 21:53:12,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,654 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table214) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,654 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table456
2023-07-17 21:53:12,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,654 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table456) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,654 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table698
2023-07-17 21:53:12,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,655 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table698) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,655 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1310
2023-07-17 21:53:12,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,656 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1310) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,656 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table215
2023-07-17 21:53:12,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,656 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table215) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,656 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table457
2023-07-17 21:53:12,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,657 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table457) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,657 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table699
2023-07-17 21:53:12,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,658 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table699) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,658 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table216
2023-07-17 21:53:12,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,658 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table216) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,658 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table458
2023-07-17 21:53:12,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,659 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table458) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,659 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table217
2023-07-17 21:53:12,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,660 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table217) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,660 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table459
2023-07-17 21:53:12,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,660 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table459) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,660 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table218
2023-07-17 21:53:12,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,661 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table218) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,661 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table219
2023-07-17 21:53:12,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,662 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table219) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,662 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1319
2023-07-17 21:53:12,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,662 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1319) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,662 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1311
2023-07-17 21:53:12,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,663 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1311) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,663 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1312
2023-07-17 21:53:12,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,664 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1312) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,664 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1313
2023-07-17 21:53:12,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,664 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1313) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,665 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1314
2023-07-17 21:53:12,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,665 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1314) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,665 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1315
2023-07-17 21:53:12,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,666 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1315) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,666 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1316
2023-07-17 21:53:12,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,667 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1316) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,667 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1317
2023-07-17 21:53:12,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,667 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1317) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,667 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1318
2023-07-17 21:53:12,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,668 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1318) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,668 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table196
2023-07-17 21:53:12,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,669 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table196) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,669 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table197
2023-07-17 21:53:12,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,669 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table197) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,669 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table198
2023-07-17 21:53:12,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,670 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table198) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,670 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table199
2023-07-17 21:53:12,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,671 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table199) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,671 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table163
2023-07-17 21:53:12,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,671 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table163) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,671 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table164
2023-07-17 21:53:12,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,672 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table164) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,672 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table165
2023-07-17 21:53:12,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,673 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table165) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,673 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table166
2023-07-17 21:53:12,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,673 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table166) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,673 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table167
2023-07-17 21:53:12,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,674 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table167) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,674 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table168
2023-07-17 21:53:12,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,674 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table168) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,675 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table169
2023-07-17 21:53:12,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,675 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table169) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,675 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table170
2023-07-17 21:53:12,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,676 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table170) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,676 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table171
2023-07-17 21:53:12,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,677 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table171) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,677 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table172
2023-07-17 21:53:12,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,677 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table172) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,677 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table173
2023-07-17 21:53:12,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,678 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table173) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,678 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table152
2023-07-17 21:53:12,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,679 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table152) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,679 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table394
2023-07-17 21:53:12,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,679 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table394) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,680 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table153
2023-07-17 21:53:12,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,680 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table153) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,680 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table395
2023-07-17 21:53:12,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,681 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table395) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,681 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table154
2023-07-17 21:53:12,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,682 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table154) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,682 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table396
2023-07-17 21:53:12,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,682 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table396) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,682 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table155
2023-07-17 21:53:12,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,683 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table155) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,683 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table397
2023-07-17 21:53:12,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,684 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table397) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,684 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table156
2023-07-17 21:53:12,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,684 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table156) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,684 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table398
2023-07-17 21:53:12,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,685 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table398) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,685 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table157
2023-07-17 21:53:12,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,686 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table157) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,686 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table399
2023-07-17 21:53:12,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,686 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table399) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,686 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table158
2023-07-17 21:53:12,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,687 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table158) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,687 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table159
2023-07-17 21:53:12,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,688 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table159) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,688 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table160
2023-07-17 21:53:12,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,688 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table160) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,688 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table161
2023-07-17 21:53:12,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,689 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table161) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,689 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table162
2023-07-17 21:53:12,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,690 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table162) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,690 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table185
2023-07-17 21:53:12,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,690 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table185) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,690 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table186
2023-07-17 21:53:12,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,691 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table186) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,691 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table187
2023-07-17 21:53:12,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,692 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table187) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,692 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table188
2023-07-17 21:53:12,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,692 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table188) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,692 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table189
2023-07-17 21:53:12,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,693 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table189) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,693 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table190
2023-07-17 21:53:12,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,694 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table190) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,694 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table191
2023-07-17 21:53:12,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,694 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table191) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,695 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table192
2023-07-17 21:53:12,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,695 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table192) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,695 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table193
2023-07-17 21:53:12,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,696 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table193) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,696 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table194
2023-07-17 21:53:12,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,696 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table194) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,697 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table195
2023-07-17 21:53:12,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,697 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table195) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,697 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table174
2023-07-17 21:53:12,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,698 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table174) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,698 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table175
2023-07-17 21:53:12,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,698 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table175) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,699 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table176
2023-07-17 21:53:12,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,699 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table176) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,699 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table177
2023-07-17 21:53:12,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,700 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table177) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,700 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table178
2023-07-17 21:53:12,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,700 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table178) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,701 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table179
2023-07-17 21:53:12,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,701 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table179) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,701 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table180
2023-07-17 21:53:12,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,702 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table180) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,702 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table181
2023-07-17 21:53:12,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,702 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table181) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,703 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table182
2023-07-17 21:53:12,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,703 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table182) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,703 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table183
2023-07-17 21:53:12,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,704 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table183) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,704 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table184
2023-07-17 21:53:12,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,704 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table184) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,705 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table800
2023-07-17 21:53:12,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,705 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table800) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,705 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table801
2023-07-17 21:53:12,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,706 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table801) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,706 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table802
2023-07-17 21:53:12,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,706 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table802) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,706 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table803
2023-07-17 21:53:12,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,707 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table803) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,707 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table804
2023-07-17 21:53:12,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,708 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table804) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,708 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table805
2023-07-17 21:53:12,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,708 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table805) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,708 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table806
2023-07-17 21:53:12,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,709 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table806) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,709 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table807
2023-07-17 21:53:12,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,710 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table807) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,710 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table808
2023-07-17 21:53:12,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,711 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table808) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,711 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table809
2023-07-17 21:53:12,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,711 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table809) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,711 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table820
2023-07-17 21:53:12,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,712 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table820) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,712 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table821
2023-07-17 21:53:12,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,713 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table821) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,713 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table822
2023-07-17 21:53:12,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,713 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table822) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,713 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table823
2023-07-17 21:53:12,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,714 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table823) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,714 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table824
2023-07-17 21:53:12,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,714 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table824) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,715 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table825
2023-07-17 21:53:12,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,715 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table825) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,715 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table826
2023-07-17 21:53:12,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,716 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table826) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,716 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table827
2023-07-17 21:53:12,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,716 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table827) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,716 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table828
2023-07-17 21:53:12,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,717 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table828) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,717 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table829
2023-07-17 21:53:12,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,718 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table829) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,718 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1193
2023-07-17 21:53:12,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,718 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1193) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,718 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1194
2023-07-17 21:53:12,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,719 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1194) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,719 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1195
2023-07-17 21:53:12,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,720 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1195) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,720 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1196
2023-07-17 21:53:12,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,720 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1196) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,720 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1197
2023-07-17 21:53:12,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,721 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1197) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,721 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1198
2023-07-17 21:53:12,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,722 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1198) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,722 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1199
2023-07-17 21:53:12,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,722 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1199) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,722 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table810
2023-07-17 21:53:12,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,723 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table810) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,723 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table811
2023-07-17 21:53:12,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,724 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table811) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,724 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table812
2023-07-17 21:53:12,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,725 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table812) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,725 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table813
2023-07-17 21:53:12,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,725 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table813) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,725 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table814
2023-07-17 21:53:12,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,726 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table814) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,726 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1190
2023-07-17 21:53:12,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,727 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1190) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,727 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table815
2023-07-17 21:53:12,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,727 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table815) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,727 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1191
2023-07-17 21:53:12,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,728 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1191) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,728 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table816
2023-07-17 21:53:12,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,729 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table816) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,729 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1192
2023-07-17 21:53:12,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,729 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1192) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,729 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table817
2023-07-17 21:53:12,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,730 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table817) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,730 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table818
2023-07-17 21:53:12,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,731 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table818) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,731 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table819
2023-07-17 21:53:12,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,731 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table819) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,731 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1260
2023-07-17 21:53:12,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,732 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1260) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,732 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1261
2023-07-17 21:53:12,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,732 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1261) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,733 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table760
2023-07-17 21:53:12,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,733 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table760) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,733 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1020
2023-07-17 21:53:12,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,734 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1020) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,734 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1262
2023-07-17 21:53:12,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,734 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1262) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,734 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table761
2023-07-17 21:53:12,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,736 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table761) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,736 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1021
2023-07-17 21:53:12,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,736 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1021) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,736 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1263
2023-07-17 21:53:12,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,737 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1263) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,737 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table520
2023-07-17 21:53:12,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,738 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table520) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,738 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table762
2023-07-17 21:53:12,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,738 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table762) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,738 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1022
2023-07-17 21:53:12,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,739 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1022) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,739 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1264
2023-07-17 21:53:12,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,740 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1264) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,740 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table521
2023-07-17 21:53:12,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,740 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table521) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,740 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table763
2023-07-17 21:53:12,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,741 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table763) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,741 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1023
2023-07-17 21:53:12,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,742 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1023) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,742 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1265
2023-07-17 21:53:12,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,742 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1265) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,742 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table522
2023-07-17 21:53:12,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,743 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table522) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,743 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table764
2023-07-17 21:53:12,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,744 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table764) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,744 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1024
2023-07-17 21:53:12,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,744 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1024) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,744 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1266
2023-07-17 21:53:12,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,745 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1266) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,745 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table523
2023-07-17 21:53:12,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,746 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table523) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,746 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table765
2023-07-17 21:53:12,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,746 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table765) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,746 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table524
2023-07-17 21:53:12,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,747 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table524) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,747 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table766
2023-07-17 21:53:12,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,747 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table766) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,748 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table525
2023-07-17 21:53:12,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,748 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table525) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,748 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table767
2023-07-17 21:53:12,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,749 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table767) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,749 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table526
2023-07-17 21:53:12,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,749 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table526) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,749 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table768
2023-07-17 21:53:12,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,750 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table768) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,750 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table527
2023-07-17 21:53:12,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,751 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table527) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,751 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table769
2023-07-17 21:53:12,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,751 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table769) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,751 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table528
2023-07-17 21:53:12,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,752 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table528) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,752 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table529
2023-07-17 21:53:12,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,753 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table529) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,753 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table90
2023-07-17 21:53:12,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,753 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table90) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,754 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table91
2023-07-17 21:53:12,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,754 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table91) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,754 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table92
2023-07-17 21:53:12,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,755 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table92) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,755 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table93
2023-07-17 21:53:12,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,755 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table93) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,756 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1025
2023-07-17 21:53:12,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,756 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1025) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,756 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1267
2023-07-17 21:53:12,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,757 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1267) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,757 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table94
2023-07-17 21:53:12,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,757 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table94) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,757 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1026
2023-07-17 21:53:12,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,758 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1026) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,758 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1268
2023-07-17 21:53:12,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,759 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1268) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,759 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table95
2023-07-17 21:53:12,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,759 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table95) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,759 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1027
2023-07-17 21:53:12,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,760 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1027) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,760 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1269
2023-07-17 21:53:12,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,761 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1269) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,761 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table96
2023-07-17 21:53:12,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,761 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table96) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,761 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1028
2023-07-17 21:53:12,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,762 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1028) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,762 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table97
2023-07-17 21:53:12,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,763 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table97) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,763 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1029
2023-07-17 21:53:12,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,763 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1029) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,763 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table98
2023-07-17 21:53:12,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,764 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table98) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,764 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table99
2023-07-17 21:53:12,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,765 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table99) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,765 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1490
2023-07-17 21:53:12,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,765 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1490) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,765 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1491
2023-07-17 21:53:12,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,766 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1491) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,766 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table990
2023-07-17 21:53:12,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,767 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table990) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,767 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1250
2023-07-17 21:53:12,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,767 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1250) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,767 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1492
2023-07-17 21:53:12,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,768 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1492) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,768 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table991
2023-07-17 21:53:12,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,769 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table991) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,769 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1251
2023-07-17 21:53:12,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,769 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1251) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,769 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1493
2023-07-17 21:53:12,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,770 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1493) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,770 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table750
2023-07-17 21:53:12,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,771 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table750) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,771 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table992
2023-07-17 21:53:12,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,771 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table992) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,771 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1010
2023-07-17 21:53:12,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,772 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1010) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,772 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1252
2023-07-17 21:53:12,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,773 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1252) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,773 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1494
2023-07-17 21:53:12,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,773 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1494) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,773 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table751
2023-07-17 21:53:12,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,774 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table751) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,774 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table993
2023-07-17 21:53:12,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,775 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table993) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,775 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1011
2023-07-17 21:53:12,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,775 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1011) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,775 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1253
2023-07-17 21:53:12,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,776 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1253) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,776 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1495
2023-07-17 21:53:12,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,776 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1495) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,777 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table510
2023-07-17 21:53:12,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,777 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table510) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,777 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table752
2023-07-17 21:53:12,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,778 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table752) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,778 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table994
2023-07-17 21:53:12,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,778 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table994) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,778 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1012
2023-07-17 21:53:12,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,779 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1012) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,779 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1254
2023-07-17 21:53:12,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,780 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1254) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,780 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1496
2023-07-17 21:53:12,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,780 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1496) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,780 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table511
2023-07-17 21:53:12,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,781 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table511) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,781 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table753
2023-07-17 21:53:12,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,782 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table753) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,782 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table995
2023-07-17 21:53:12,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,782 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table995) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,783 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1013
2023-07-17 21:53:12,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,783 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1013) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,783 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1255
2023-07-17 21:53:12,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,784 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1255) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,784 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1497
2023-07-17 21:53:12,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,785 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1497) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,785 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table512
2023-07-17 21:53:12,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,785 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table512) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,785 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table754
2023-07-17 21:53:12,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,786 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table754) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,786 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table996
2023-07-17 21:53:12,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,787 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table996) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,787 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table513
2023-07-17 21:53:12,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,787 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table513) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,787 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table755
2023-07-17 21:53:12,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,788 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table755) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,788 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table997
2023-07-17 21:53:12,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,789 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table997) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,789 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table514
2023-07-17 21:53:12,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,789 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table514) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,789 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table756
2023-07-17 21:53:12,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,790 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table756) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,790 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table998
2023-07-17 21:53:12,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,790 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table998) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,791 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table515
2023-07-17 21:53:12,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,791 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table515) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,791 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table757
2023-07-17 21:53:12,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,792 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table757) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,792 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table999
2023-07-17 21:53:12,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,792 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table999) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,792 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table516
2023-07-17 21:53:12,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,793 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table516) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,793 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table758
2023-07-17 21:53:12,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,794 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table758) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,794 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table517
2023-07-17 21:53:12,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,794 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table517) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,794 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table759
2023-07-17 21:53:12,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,795 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table759) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,795 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table518
2023-07-17 21:53:12,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,796 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table518) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,796 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table519
2023-07-17 21:53:12,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,796 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table519) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,796 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table80
2023-07-17 21:53:12,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,797 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table80) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,797 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table81
2023-07-17 21:53:12,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,798 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table81) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,798 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table82
2023-07-17 21:53:12,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,799 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table82) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,799 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1014
2023-07-17 21:53:12,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,799 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1014) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,799 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1256
2023-07-17 21:53:12,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,800 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1256) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,800 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1498
2023-07-17 21:53:12,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,800 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1498) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,801 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table83
2023-07-17 21:53:12,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,801 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table83) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,801 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1015
2023-07-17 21:53:12,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,802 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1015) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,802 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1257
2023-07-17 21:53:12,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,802 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1257) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,802 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1499
2023-07-17 21:53:12,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,803 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1499) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,803 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table84
2023-07-17 21:53:12,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,804 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table84) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,804 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1016
2023-07-17 21:53:12,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,804 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1016) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,804 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1258
2023-07-17 21:53:12,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,805 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1258) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,805 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table85
2023-07-17 21:53:12,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,806 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table85) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,806 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1017
2023-07-17 21:53:12,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,806 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1017) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,806 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1259
2023-07-17 21:53:12,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,807 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1259) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,807 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table86
2023-07-17 21:53:12,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,808 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table86) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,808 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1018
2023-07-17 21:53:12,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,808 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1018) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,808 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table87
2023-07-17 21:53:12,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,809 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table87) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,809 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1019
2023-07-17 21:53:12,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,810 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1019) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,810 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table88
2023-07-17 21:53:12,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,810 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table88) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,810 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table89
2023-07-17 21:53:12,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,811 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table89) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,811 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table79
2023-07-17 21:53:12,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,812 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table79) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,812 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table780
2023-07-17 21:53:12,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,813 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table780) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,813 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1480
2023-07-17 21:53:12,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,813 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1480) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,813 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table781
2023-07-17 21:53:12,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,814 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table781) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,814 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1481
2023-07-17 21:53:12,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,815 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1481) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,815 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table540
2023-07-17 21:53:12,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,815 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table540) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,815 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table782
2023-07-17 21:53:12,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,816 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table782) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,816 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1240
2023-07-17 21:53:12,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,816 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1240) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,817 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1482
2023-07-17 21:53:12,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,817 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1482) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,817 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table541
2023-07-17 21:53:12,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,818 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table541) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,818 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table783
2023-07-17 21:53:12,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,818 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table783) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,818 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1241
2023-07-17 21:53:12,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,819 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1241) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,819 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1483
2023-07-17 21:53:12,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,820 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1483) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,820 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table300
2023-07-17 21:53:12,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,820 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table300) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,820 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table542
2023-07-17 21:53:12,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,821 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table542) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,821 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table784
2023-07-17 21:53:12,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,822 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table784) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,822 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1000
2023-07-17 21:53:12,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,822 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1000) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,822 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1242
2023-07-17 21:53:12,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,823 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1242) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,823 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1484
2023-07-17 21:53:12,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,824 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1484) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,824 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table301
2023-07-17 21:53:12,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,824 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table301) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,824 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table543
2023-07-17 21:53:12,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,825 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table543) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,825 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table785
2023-07-17 21:53:12,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,825 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table785) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,826 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1001
2023-07-17 21:53:12,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,826 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1001) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,826 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1243
2023-07-17 21:53:12,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,827 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1243) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,827 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1485
2023-07-17 21:53:12,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,828 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1485) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,828 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table302
2023-07-17 21:53:12,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,828 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table302) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,828 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table544
2023-07-17 21:53:12,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,829 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table544) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,829 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table786
2023-07-17 21:53:12,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,830 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table786) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,830 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1002
2023-07-17 21:53:12,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,830 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1002) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,830 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1244
2023-07-17 21:53:12,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,831 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1244) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,831 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1486
2023-07-17 21:53:12,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,832 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1486) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,832 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table303
2023-07-17 21:53:12,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,832 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table303) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,832 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table545
2023-07-17 21:53:12,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,833 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table545) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,833 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table787
2023-07-17 21:53:12,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,833 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table787) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,834 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table304
2023-07-17 21:53:12,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,834 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table304) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,834 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table546
2023-07-17 21:53:12,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,835 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table546) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,835 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table788
2023-07-17 21:53:12,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,835 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table788) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,836 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table305
2023-07-17 21:53:12,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,836 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table305) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,836 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table547
2023-07-17 21:53:12,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,837 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table547) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,837 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table789
2023-07-17 21:53:12,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,837 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table789) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,838 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table306
2023-07-17 21:53:12,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,838 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table306) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,838 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table548
2023-07-17 21:53:12,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,839 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table548) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,839 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table307
2023-07-17 21:53:12,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,840 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table307) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,840 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table549
2023-07-17 21:53:12,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,840 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table549) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,840 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table308
2023-07-17 21:53:12,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,841 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table308) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,841 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table309
2023-07-17 21:53:12,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,842 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table309) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,842 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table70
2023-07-17 21:53:12,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,843 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table70) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,843 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table71
2023-07-17 21:53:12,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,843 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table71) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,843 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1003
2023-07-17 21:53:12,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,844 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1003) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,844 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1245
2023-07-17 21:53:12,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,845 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1245) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,845 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1487
2023-07-17 21:53:12,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,845 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1487) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,845 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table72
2023-07-17 21:53:12,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,846 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table72) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,846 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1004
2023-07-17 21:53:12,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,847 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1004) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,847 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1246
2023-07-17 21:53:12,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,847 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1246) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,848 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1488
2023-07-17 21:53:12,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,848 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1488) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,848 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table73
2023-07-17 21:53:12,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,849 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table73) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,849 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1005
2023-07-17 21:53:12,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,850 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1005) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,850 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1247
2023-07-17 21:53:12,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,850 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1247) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,850 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1489
2023-07-17 21:53:12,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,851 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1489) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,851 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table74
2023-07-17 21:53:12,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,852 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table74) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,852 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1006
2023-07-17 21:53:12,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,852 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1006) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,852 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1248
2023-07-17 21:53:12,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,853 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1248) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,853 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table75
2023-07-17 21:53:12,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,854 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table75) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,854 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1007
2023-07-17 21:53:12,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,854 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1007) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,854 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1249
2023-07-17 21:53:12,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,855 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1249) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,855 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table76
2023-07-17 21:53:12,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,856 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table76) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,856 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1008
2023-07-17 21:53:12,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,856 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1008) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,857 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table77
2023-07-17 21:53:12,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,857 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table77) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,857 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1009
2023-07-17 21:53:12,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,858 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1009) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,858 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table78
2023-07-17 21:53:12,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,859 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table78) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,859 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table68
2023-07-17 21:53:12,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,859 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table68) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,859 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table69
2023-07-17 21:53:12,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,860 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table69) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,860 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table770
2023-07-17 21:53:12,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,861 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table770) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,861 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1470
2023-07-17 21:53:12,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,861 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1470) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,861 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table771
2023-07-17 21:53:12,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,862 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table771) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,862 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1471
2023-07-17 21:53:12,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,863 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1471) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,863 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table530
2023-07-17 21:53:12,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,863 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table530) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,864 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table772
2023-07-17 21:53:12,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,864 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table772) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,864 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1230
2023-07-17 21:53:12,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,865 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1230) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,865 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1472
2023-07-17 21:53:12,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,865 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1472) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,866 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table531
2023-07-17 21:53:12,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,866 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table531) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,866 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table773
2023-07-17 21:53:12,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,867 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table773) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,867 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1231
2023-07-17 21:53:12,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,867 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1231) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,868 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1473
2023-07-17 21:53:12,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,868 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1473) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,868 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table532
2023-07-17 21:53:12,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,869 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table532) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,869 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table774
2023-07-17 21:53:12,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,869 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table774) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,870 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1232
2023-07-17 21:53:12,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,870 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1232) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,870 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1474
2023-07-17 21:53:12,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,871 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1474) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,871 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table533
2023-07-17 21:53:12,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,871 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table533) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,872 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table775
2023-07-17 21:53:12,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,872 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table775) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,873 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1233
2023-07-17 21:53:12,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,873 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1233) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,873 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1475
2023-07-17 21:53:12,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,874 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1475) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,874 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table534
2023-07-17 21:53:12,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,875 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table534) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,875 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table776
2023-07-17 21:53:12,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,875 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table776) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,875 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table535
2023-07-17 21:53:12,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,876 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table535) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,876 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table777
2023-07-17 21:53:12,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,877 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table777) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,877 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table536
2023-07-17 21:53:12,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,877 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table536) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,877 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table778
2023-07-17 21:53:12,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,878 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table778) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,878 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table537
2023-07-17 21:53:12,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,879 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table537) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,879 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table779
2023-07-17 21:53:12,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,879 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table779) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,879 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table538
2023-07-17 21:53:12,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,880 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table538) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,880 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table539
2023-07-17 21:53:12,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,881 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table539) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,881 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table60
2023-07-17 21:53:12,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,881 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table60) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,881 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1234
2023-07-17 21:53:12,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,882 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1234) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,882 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1476
2023-07-17 21:53:12,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,883 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1476) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,883 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table61
2023-07-17 21:53:12,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,883 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table61) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,883 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1235
2023-07-17 21:53:12,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,884 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1235) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,884 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1477
2023-07-17 21:53:12,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,885 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1477) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,885 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table62
2023-07-17 21:53:12,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,885 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table62) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,885 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1236
2023-07-17 21:53:12,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,886 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1236) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,886 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1478
2023-07-17 21:53:12,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,887 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1478) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,887 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table63
2023-07-17 21:53:12,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,888 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table63) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,888 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1237
2023-07-17 21:53:12,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,889 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1237) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,889 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1479
2023-07-17 21:53:12,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,889 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1479) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,889 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table64
2023-07-17 21:53:12,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,890 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table64) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,890 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1238
2023-07-17 21:53:12,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,891 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1238) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,891 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table65
2023-07-17 21:53:12,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,891 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table65) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,891 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1239
2023-07-17 21:53:12,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,892 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1239) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,892 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table66
2023-07-17 21:53:12,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,893 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table66) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,893 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table67
2023-07-17 21:53:12,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,893 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table67) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,893 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1061
2023-07-17 21:53:12,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,894 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1061) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,894 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1062
2023-07-17 21:53:12,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,895 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1062) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,895 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1063
2023-07-17 21:53:12,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,895 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1063) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,895 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1064
2023-07-17 21:53:12,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,896 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1064) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,896 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1065
2023-07-17 21:53:12,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,897 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1065) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,897 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table960
2023-07-17 21:53:12,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,897 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table960) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,897 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1066
2023-07-17 21:53:12,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,898 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1066) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,898 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table961
2023-07-17 21:53:12,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,899 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table961) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,899 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1067
2023-07-17 21:53:12,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,899 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1067) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,899 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table720
2023-07-17 21:53:12,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,900 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table720) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,900 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table962
2023-07-17 21:53:12,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,901 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table962) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,901 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1068
2023-07-17 21:53:12,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,901 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1068) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,901 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table721
2023-07-17 21:53:12,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,902 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table721) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,902 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table963
2023-07-17 21:53:12,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,903 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table963) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,903 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table722
2023-07-17 21:53:12,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,904 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table722) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,904 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table964
2023-07-17 21:53:12,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,904 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table964) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,904 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table723
2023-07-17 21:53:12,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,905 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table723) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,906 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table965
2023-07-17 21:53:12,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,906 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table965) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,906 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table724
2023-07-17 21:53:12,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,907 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table724) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,907 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table966
2023-07-17 21:53:12,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,908 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table966) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,908 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table725
2023-07-17 21:53:12,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,908 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table725) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,908 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table967
2023-07-17 21:53:12,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,909 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table967) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,909 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table726
2023-07-17 21:53:12,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,910 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table726) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,910 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table968
2023-07-17 21:53:12,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,911 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table968) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,911 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table727
2023-07-17 21:53:12,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,911 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table727) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,911 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table969
2023-07-17 21:53:12,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,912 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table969) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,912 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table728
2023-07-17 21:53:12,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,913 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table728) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,913 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1060
2023-07-17 21:53:12,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,913 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1060) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,913 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table729
2023-07-17 21:53:12,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,914 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table729) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,914 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1069
2023-07-17 21:53:12,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,915 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1069) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,915 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1050
2023-07-17 21:53:12,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,915 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1050) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,915 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1292
2023-07-17 21:53:12,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,916 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1292) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,916 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1051
2023-07-17 21:53:12,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,917 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1051) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,917 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1293
2023-07-17 21:53:12,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,917 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1293) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,917 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1052
2023-07-17 21:53:12,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,918 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1052) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,918 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1294
2023-07-17 21:53:12,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,919 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1294) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,919 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1053
2023-07-17 21:53:12,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,920 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1053) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,920 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1295
2023-07-17 21:53:12,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,921 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1295) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,921 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1054
2023-07-17 21:53:12,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,921 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1054) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,921 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1296
2023-07-17 21:53:12,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,922 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1296) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,922 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1055
2023-07-17 21:53:12,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,923 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1055) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,923 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1297
2023-07-17 21:53:12,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,923 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1297) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,923 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table950
2023-07-17 21:53:12,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,924 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table950) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,924 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1056
2023-07-17 21:53:12,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,925 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1056) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,925 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1298
2023-07-17 21:53:12,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,926 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1298) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,926 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table951
2023-07-17 21:53:12,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,926 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table951) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,926 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1057
2023-07-17 21:53:12,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,927 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1057) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,927 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1299
2023-07-17 21:53:12,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,928 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1299) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,928 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table710
2023-07-17 21:53:12,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,928 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table710) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,928 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table952
2023-07-17 21:53:12,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,929 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table952) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,929 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table711
2023-07-17 21:53:12,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,930 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table711) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,930 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table953
2023-07-17 21:53:12,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,930 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table953) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,930 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table712
2023-07-17 21:53:12,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,931 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table712) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,931 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table954
2023-07-17 21:53:12,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,932 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table954) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,932 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table713
2023-07-17 21:53:12,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,932 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table713) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,932 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table955
2023-07-17 21:53:12,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,933 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table955) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,933 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table714
2023-07-17 21:53:12,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,934 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table714) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,934 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table956
2023-07-17 21:53:12,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,935 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table956) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,935 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table715
2023-07-17 21:53:12,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,936 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table715) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,936 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table957
2023-07-17 21:53:12,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,936 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table957) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,936 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table716
2023-07-17 21:53:12,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,937 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table716) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,937 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table958
2023-07-17 21:53:12,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,938 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table958) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,938 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1290
2023-07-17 21:53:12,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,938 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1290) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,938 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table717
2023-07-17 21:53:12,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,939 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table717) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,939 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table959
2023-07-17 21:53:12,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,940 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table959) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,940 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1291
2023-07-17 21:53:12,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,940 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1291) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,940 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table718
2023-07-17 21:53:12,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,941 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table718) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,941 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table719
2023-07-17 21:53:12,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,942 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table719) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,942 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1058
2023-07-17 21:53:12,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,942 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1058) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,942 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1059
2023-07-17 21:53:12,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,943 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1059) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,943 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1281
2023-07-17 21:53:12,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,944 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1281) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,944 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1040
2023-07-17 21:53:12,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,944 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1040) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,944 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1282
2023-07-17 21:53:12,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,945 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1282) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,945 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1041
2023-07-17 21:53:12,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,946 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1041) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,946 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1283
2023-07-17 21:53:12,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,946 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1283) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,946 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table980
2023-07-17 21:53:12,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,947 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table980) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,947 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1042
2023-07-17 21:53:12,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,948 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1042) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,948 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1284
2023-07-17 21:53:12,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,948 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1284) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,948 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table981
2023-07-17 21:53:12,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,949 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table981) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,949 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1043
2023-07-17 21:53:12,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,950 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1043) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,950 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1285
2023-07-17 21:53:12,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,951 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1285) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,951 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table740
2023-07-17 21:53:12,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,951 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table740) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,951 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table982
2023-07-17 21:53:12,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,952 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table982) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,952 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1044
2023-07-17 21:53:12,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,953 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1044) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,953 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1286
2023-07-17 21:53:12,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,953 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1286) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,953 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table741
2023-07-17 21:53:12,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,954 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table741) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,954 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table983
2023-07-17 21:53:12,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,955 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table983) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,955 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1045
2023-07-17 21:53:12,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,956 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1045) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,956 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1287
2023-07-17 21:53:12,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,956 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1287) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,956 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table500
2023-07-17 21:53:12,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,957 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table500) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,957 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table742
2023-07-17 21:53:12,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,958 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table742) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,958 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table984
2023-07-17 21:53:12,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,958 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table984) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,958 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1046
2023-07-17 21:53:12,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,959 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1046) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,959 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1288
2023-07-17 21:53:12,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,960 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1288) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,960 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table501
2023-07-17 21:53:12,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,960 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table501) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,960 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table743
2023-07-17 21:53:12,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,961 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table743) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,961 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table985
2023-07-17 21:53:12,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,962 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table985) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,962 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table502
2023-07-17 21:53:12,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,962 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table502) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,962 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table744
2023-07-17 21:53:12,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,963 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table744) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,963 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table986
2023-07-17 21:53:12,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,964 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table986) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,964 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table503
2023-07-17 21:53:12,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,964 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table503) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,965 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table745
2023-07-17 21:53:12,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,965 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table745) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,965 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table987
2023-07-17 21:53:12,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,966 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table987) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,966 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table504
2023-07-17 21:53:12,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,967 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table504) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,967 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table746
2023-07-17 21:53:12,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,967 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table746) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,967 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table988
2023-07-17 21:53:12,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,968 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table988) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,968 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table505
2023-07-17 21:53:12,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,969 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table505) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,969 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table747
2023-07-17 21:53:12,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,969 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table747) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,969 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table989
2023-07-17 21:53:12,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,970 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table989) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,970 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table506
2023-07-17 21:53:12,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,971 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table506) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,971 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table748
2023-07-17 21:53:12,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,972 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table748) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,972 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table507
2023-07-17 21:53:12,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,972 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table507) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,972 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table749
2023-07-17 21:53:12,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,973 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table749) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,973 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table508
2023-07-17 21:53:12,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,974 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table508) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,974 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1280
2023-07-17 21:53:12,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,974 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1280) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,974 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table509
2023-07-17 21:53:12,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,975 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table509) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,975 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1047
2023-07-17 21:53:12,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,976 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1047) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,976 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1289
2023-07-17 21:53:12,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,976 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1289) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,976 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1048
2023-07-17 21:53:12,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,977 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1048) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,977 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1049
2023-07-17 21:53:12,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,978 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1049) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,978 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1270
2023-07-17 21:53:12,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,978 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1270) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,978 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1271
2023-07-17 21:53:12,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,979 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1271) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,979 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1030
2023-07-17 21:53:12,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,980 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1030) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,980 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1272
2023-07-17 21:53:12,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,981 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1272) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,981 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1031
2023-07-17 21:53:12,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,982 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1031) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,982 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1273
2023-07-17 21:53:12,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,982 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1273) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,982 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table970
2023-07-17 21:53:12,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,983 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table970) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,983 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1032
2023-07-17 21:53:12,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,984 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1032) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,984 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1274
2023-07-17 21:53:12,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,984 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1274) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,984 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table971
2023-07-17 21:53:12,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,985 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table971) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,985 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1033
2023-07-17 21:53:12,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,986 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1033) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,986 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1275
2023-07-17 21:53:12,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,986 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1275) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,986 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table730
2023-07-17 21:53:12,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,987 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table730) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,987 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table972
2023-07-17 21:53:12,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,988 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table972) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,988 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1034
2023-07-17 21:53:12,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,988 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1034) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,988 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1276
2023-07-17 21:53:12,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,989 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1276) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,989 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table731
2023-07-17 21:53:12,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,990 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table731) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,990 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table973
2023-07-17 21:53:12,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,991 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table973) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,991 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1035
2023-07-17 21:53:12,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,991 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1035) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,991 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1277
2023-07-17 21:53:12,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,992 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1277) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,992 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table732
2023-07-17 21:53:12,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,993 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table732) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,993 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table974
2023-07-17 21:53:12,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,993 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table974) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,993 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table733
2023-07-17 21:53:12,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,994 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table733) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,994 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table975
2023-07-17 21:53:12,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,995 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table975) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,995 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table734
2023-07-17 21:53:12,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,995 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table734) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,996 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table976
2023-07-17 21:53:12,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,996 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table976) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,996 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table735
2023-07-17 21:53:12,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,997 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table735) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,997 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table977
2023-07-17 21:53:12,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,998 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table977) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,998 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table736
2023-07-17 21:53:12,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,998 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table736) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,999 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table978
2023-07-17 21:53:12,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:12,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:12,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:12,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:12,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,999 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table978) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:12,999 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table737
2023-07-17 21:53:12,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:12,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:12,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:12,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,000 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table737) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,000 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table979
2023-07-17 21:53:13,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,001 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table979) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,001 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table738
2023-07-17 21:53:13,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,001 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table738) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,001 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table739
2023-07-17 21:53:13,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,002 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table739) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,002 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1036
2023-07-17 21:53:13,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,003 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1036) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,003 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1278
2023-07-17 21:53:13,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,003 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1278) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,003 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1037
2023-07-17 21:53:13,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,004 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1037) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,004 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1279
2023-07-17 21:53:13,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,005 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1279) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,005 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1038
2023-07-17 21:53:13,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,005 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1038) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,005 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1039
2023-07-17 21:53:13,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,006 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1039) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,006 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table13
2023-07-17 21:53:13,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,007 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table13) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,007 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table361
2023-07-17 21:53:13,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,007 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table361) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,008 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table14
2023-07-17 21:53:13,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,008 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table14) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,008 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table120
2023-07-17 21:53:13,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,009 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table120) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,009 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table362
2023-07-17 21:53:13,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,009 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table362) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,010 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table15
2023-07-17 21:53:13,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,010 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table15) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,010 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table121
2023-07-17 21:53:13,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,011 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table121) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,011 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table363
2023-07-17 21:53:13,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,012 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table363) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,012 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table16
2023-07-17 21:53:13,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,013 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table16) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,013 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table122
2023-07-17 21:53:13,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,013 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table122) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,013 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table364
2023-07-17 21:53:13,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,014 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table364) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,014 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table17
2023-07-17 21:53:13,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,015 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table17) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,015 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table123
2023-07-17 21:53:13,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,015 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table123) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,015 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table365
2023-07-17 21:53:13,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,016 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table365) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,016 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table18
2023-07-17 21:53:13,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,017 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table18) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,017 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table124
2023-07-17 21:53:13,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,017 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table124) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,017 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table366
2023-07-17 21:53:13,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,018 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table366) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,018 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table19
2023-07-17 21:53:13,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,019 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table19) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,019 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table125
2023-07-17 21:53:13,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,019 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table125) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,020 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table367
2023-07-17 21:53:13,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,020 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table367) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,020 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table126
2023-07-17 21:53:13,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,021 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table126) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,021 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table368
2023-07-17 21:53:13,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,022 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table368) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,022 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1420
2023-07-17 21:53:13,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,022 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1420) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,022 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table127
2023-07-17 21:53:13,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,023 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table127) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,023 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table369
2023-07-17 21:53:13,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,024 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table369) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,024 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table128
2023-07-17 21:53:13,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,024 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table128) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,024 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table129
2023-07-17 21:53:13,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,025 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table129) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,025 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1429
2023-07-17 21:53:13,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,026 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1429) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,026 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1421
2023-07-17 21:53:13,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,026 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1421) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,027 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1422
2023-07-17 21:53:13,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,027 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1422) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,027 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1423
2023-07-17 21:53:13,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,028 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1423) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,028 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1424
2023-07-17 21:53:13,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,029 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1424) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,029 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1425
2023-07-17 21:53:13,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,029 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1425) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,029 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table10
2023-07-17 21:53:13,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,030 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table10) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,030 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1426
2023-07-17 21:53:13,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,031 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1426) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,031 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table11
2023-07-17 21:53:13,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,031 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table11) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,031 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table370
2023-07-17 21:53:13,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,032 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table370) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,032 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1427
2023-07-17 21:53:13,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,033 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1427) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,033 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table12
2023-07-17 21:53:13,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,033 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table12) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,033 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table371
2023-07-17 21:53:13,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,034 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table371) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,034 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1428
2023-07-17 21:53:13,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,035 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1428) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,035 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table350
2023-07-17 21:53:13,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,035 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table350) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,036 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table592
2023-07-17 21:53:13,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,036 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table592) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,036 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table351
2023-07-17 21:53:13,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,037 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table351) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,037 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table593
2023-07-17 21:53:13,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,037 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table593) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,038 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table110
2023-07-17 21:53:13,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,038 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table110) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,038 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table352
2023-07-17 21:53:13,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,039 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table352) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,039 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table594
2023-07-17 21:53:13,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,040 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table594) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,040 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table111
2023-07-17 21:53:13,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,040 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table111) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,040 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table353
2023-07-17 21:53:13,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,041 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table353) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,041 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table595
2023-07-17 21:53:13,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,042 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table595) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,042 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table112
2023-07-17 21:53:13,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,043 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table112) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,043 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table354
2023-07-17 21:53:13,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,044 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table354) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,044 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table596
2023-07-17 21:53:13,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,044 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table596) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,044 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table113
2023-07-17 21:53:13,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,045 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table113) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,045 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table355
2023-07-17 21:53:13,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,046 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table355) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,046 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table597
2023-07-17 21:53:13,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,046 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table597) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,046 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table114
2023-07-17 21:53:13,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,047 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table114) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,047 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table356
2023-07-17 21:53:13,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,048 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table356) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,048 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table598
2023-07-17 21:53:13,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,048 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table598) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,049 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table115
2023-07-17 21:53:13,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,049 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table115) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,049 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table357
2023-07-17 21:53:13,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,050 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table357) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,050 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table599
2023-07-17 21:53:13,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,051 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table599) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,051 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table116
2023-07-17 21:53:13,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,051 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table116) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,051 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table358
2023-07-17 21:53:13,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,052 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table358) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,052 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table117
2023-07-17 21:53:13,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,053 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table117) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,053 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table359
2023-07-17 21:53:13,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,053 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table359) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,053 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table118
2023-07-17 21:53:13,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,054 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table118) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,054 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table119
2023-07-17 21:53:13,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,055 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table119) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,055 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1418
2023-07-17 21:53:13,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,055 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1418) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,056 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1419
2023-07-17 21:53:13,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,056 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1419) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,056 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1410
2023-07-17 21:53:13,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,057 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1410) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,057 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1411
2023-07-17 21:53:13,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,058 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1411) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,058 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1412
2023-07-17 21:53:13,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,059 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1412) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,059 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1413
2023-07-17 21:53:13,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,059 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1413) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,060 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1414
2023-07-17 21:53:13,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,060 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1414) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,060 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1415
2023-07-17 21:53:13,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,061 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1415) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,061 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1416
2023-07-17 21:53:13,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,062 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1416) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,062 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table360
2023-07-17 21:53:13,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,062 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table360) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,063 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1417
2023-07-17 21:53:13,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,063 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1417) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,063 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table141
2023-07-17 21:53:13,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,064 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table141) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,064 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table383
2023-07-17 21:53:13,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,065 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table383) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,065 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table142
2023-07-17 21:53:13,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,065 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table142) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,065 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table384
2023-07-17 21:53:13,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,066 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table384) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,066 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table143
2023-07-17 21:53:13,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,067 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table143) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,067 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table385
2023-07-17 21:53:13,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,067 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table385) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,067 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table144
2023-07-17 21:53:13,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,068 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table144) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,068 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table386
2023-07-17 21:53:13,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,069 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table386) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,069 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table145
2023-07-17 21:53:13,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,069 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table145) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,069 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table387
2023-07-17 21:53:13,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,070 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table387) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,070 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table146
2023-07-17 21:53:13,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,071 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table146) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,071 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table388
2023-07-17 21:53:13,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,071 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table388) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,072 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table147
2023-07-17 21:53:13,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,072 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table147) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,072 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table389
2023-07-17 21:53:13,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,073 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table389) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,073 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table148
2023-07-17 21:53:13,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,074 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table148) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,074 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table149
2023-07-17 21:53:13,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,075 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table149) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,075 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,076 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,076 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1407
2023-07-17 21:53:13,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,077 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1407) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,077 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,077 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,077 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1408
2023-07-17 21:53:13,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,078 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1408) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,078 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,079 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,079 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1409
2023-07-17 21:53:13,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,079 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1409) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,079 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,080 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,080 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,081 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,081 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,081 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,082 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1400
2023-07-17 21:53:13,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,082 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1400) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,082 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1401
2023-07-17 21:53:13,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,083 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1401) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,083 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1402
2023-07-17 21:53:13,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,084 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1402) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,084 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table9
2023-07-17 21:53:13,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,084 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table9) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,084 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table390
2023-07-17 21:53:13,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,085 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table390) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,085 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1403
2023-07-17 21:53:13,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,086 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1403) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,086 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table8
2023-07-17 21:53:13,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,086 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table8) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,087 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table391
2023-07-17 21:53:13,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,087 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table391) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,087 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1404
2023-07-17 21:53:13,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,088 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1404) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,088 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-17 21:53:13,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,089 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,089 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table150
2023-07-17 21:53:13,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,089 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table150) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,089 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table392
2023-07-17 21:53:13,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,090 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table392) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,091 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1405
2023-07-17 21:53:13,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,091 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1405) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,092 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-17 21:53:13,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,092 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,092 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table151
2023-07-17 21:53:13,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,093 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table151) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,093 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table393
2023-07-17 21:53:13,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,094 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table393) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,094 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1406
2023-07-17 21:53:13,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,094 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1406) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,094 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table130
2023-07-17 21:53:13,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,095 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table130) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,095 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table372
2023-07-17 21:53:13,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,096 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table372) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,096 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table131
2023-07-17 21:53:13,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,096 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table131) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,096 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table373
2023-07-17 21:53:13,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,097 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table373) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,097 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table132
2023-07-17 21:53:13,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,098 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table132) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,098 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table374
2023-07-17 21:53:13,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,099 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table374) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,099 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table133
2023-07-17 21:53:13,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,099 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table133) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,099 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table375
2023-07-17 21:53:13,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,100 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table375) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,100 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table134
2023-07-17 21:53:13,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,101 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table134) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,101 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table376
2023-07-17 21:53:13,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,101 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table376) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,101 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table135
2023-07-17 21:53:13,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,102 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table135) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,102 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table377
2023-07-17 21:53:13,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,103 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table377) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,103 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table136
2023-07-17 21:53:13,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,104 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table136) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,104 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table378
2023-07-17 21:53:13,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,104 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table378) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,104 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table137
2023-07-17 21:53:13,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,105 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table137) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,105 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table379
2023-07-17 21:53:13,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,106 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table379) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,106 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table138
2023-07-17 21:53:13,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,106 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table138) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,107 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table139
2023-07-17 21:53:13,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,107 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table139) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,108 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table380
2023-07-17 21:53:13,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,108 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table380) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,108 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table381
2023-07-17 21:53:13,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,109 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table381) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,109 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table140
2023-07-17 21:53:13,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,110 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table140) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,110 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table382
2023-07-17 21:53:13,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,110 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table382) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,110 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table57
2023-07-17 21:53:13,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,111 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table57) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,111 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table58
2023-07-17 21:53:13,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,112 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table58) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,112 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table560
2023-07-17 21:53:13,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,113 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table560) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,113 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table59
2023-07-17 21:53:13,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,113 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table59) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,113 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table561
2023-07-17 21:53:13,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,114 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table561) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,114 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table320
2023-07-17 21:53:13,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,115 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table320) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,115 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table562
2023-07-17 21:53:13,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,115 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table562) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,115 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1460
2023-07-17 21:53:13,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,116 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1460) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,116 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table321
2023-07-17 21:53:13,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,117 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table321) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,117 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table563
2023-07-17 21:53:13,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,117 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table563) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,117 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1461
2023-07-17 21:53:13,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,118 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1461) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,118 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table322
2023-07-17 21:53:13,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,119 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table322) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,119 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table564
2023-07-17 21:53:13,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,119 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table564) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,120 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1220
2023-07-17 21:53:13,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,120 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1220) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,120 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1462
2023-07-17 21:53:13,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,121 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1462) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,121 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table323
2023-07-17 21:53:13,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,122 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table323) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,122 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table565
2023-07-17 21:53:13,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,122 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table565) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,123 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1221
2023-07-17 21:53:13,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,123 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1221) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,123 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1463
2023-07-17 21:53:13,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,124 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1463) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,124 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table324
2023-07-17 21:53:13,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,125 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table324) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,125 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table566
2023-07-17 21:53:13,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,125 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table566) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,126 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1222
2023-07-17 21:53:13,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,126 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1222) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,126 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1464
2023-07-17 21:53:13,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,127 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1464) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,127 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table325
2023-07-17 21:53:13,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,128 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table325) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,128 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table567
2023-07-17 21:53:13,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,128 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table567) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,128 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table326
2023-07-17 21:53:13,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,129 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table326) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,129 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table568
2023-07-17 21:53:13,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,130 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table568) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,130 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table327
2023-07-17 21:53:13,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,130 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table327) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,130 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table569
2023-07-17 21:53:13,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,131 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table569) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,131 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table328
2023-07-17 21:53:13,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,132 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table328) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,132 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table329
2023-07-17 21:53:13,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,132 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table329) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,133 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1223
2023-07-17 21:53:13,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,133 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1223) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,133 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1465
2023-07-17 21:53:13,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,134 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1465) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,134 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table50
2023-07-17 21:53:13,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,135 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table50) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,135 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1224
2023-07-17 21:53:13,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,135 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1224) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,135 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1466
2023-07-17 21:53:13,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,136 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1466) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,136 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table51
2023-07-17 21:53:13,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,137 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table51) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,137 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1225
2023-07-17 21:53:13,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,137 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1225) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,137 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1467
2023-07-17 21:53:13,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,138 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1467) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,139 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table52
2023-07-17 21:53:13,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,140 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table52) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,140 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1226
2023-07-17 21:53:13,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,140 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1226) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,140 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1468
2023-07-17 21:53:13,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,141 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1468) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,141 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table53
2023-07-17 21:53:13,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,142 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table53) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,142 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1227
2023-07-17 21:53:13,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,142 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1227) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,142 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1469
2023-07-17 21:53:13,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,143 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1469) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,143 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table54
2023-07-17 21:53:13,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,144 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table54) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,144 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1228
2023-07-17 21:53:13,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,144 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1228) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,144 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table55
2023-07-17 21:53:13,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,145 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table55) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,145 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1229
2023-07-17 21:53:13,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,146 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1229) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,146 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table56
2023-07-17 21:53:13,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,146 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table56) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,146 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table46
2023-07-17 21:53:13,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,147 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table46) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,147 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table790
2023-07-17 21:53:13,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,148 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table790) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,148 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table47
2023-07-17 21:53:13,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,148 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table47) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,149 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table791
2023-07-17 21:53:13,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,149 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table791) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,149 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table48
2023-07-17 21:53:13,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,150 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table48) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,150 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table550
2023-07-17 21:53:13,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,151 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table550) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,151 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table792
2023-07-17 21:53:13,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,151 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table792) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,151 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table49
2023-07-17 21:53:13,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,152 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table49) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,152 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table551
2023-07-17 21:53:13,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,153 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table551) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,153 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table793
2023-07-17 21:53:13,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,153 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table793) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,154 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table310
2023-07-17 21:53:13,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,154 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table310) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,155 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table552
2023-07-17 21:53:13,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,155 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table552) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,156 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table794
2023-07-17 21:53:13,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,156 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table794) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,156 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1450
2023-07-17 21:53:13,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,157 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1450) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,157 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table311
2023-07-17 21:53:13,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,158 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table311) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,158 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table553
2023-07-17 21:53:13,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,158 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table553) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,158 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table795
2023-07-17 21:53:13,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,159 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table795) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,159 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1451
2023-07-17 21:53:13,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,160 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1451) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,160 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table312
2023-07-17 21:53:13,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,160 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table312) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,160 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table554
2023-07-17 21:53:13,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,161 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table554) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,161 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table796
2023-07-17 21:53:13,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,162 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table796) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,162 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1210
2023-07-17 21:53:13,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,162 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1210) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,163 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1452
2023-07-17 21:53:13,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,163 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1452) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,163 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table313
2023-07-17 21:53:13,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,164 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table313) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,164 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table555
2023-07-17 21:53:13,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,165 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table555) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,165 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table797
2023-07-17 21:53:13,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,165 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table797) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,165 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1211
2023-07-17 21:53:13,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,166 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1211) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,166 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1453
2023-07-17 21:53:13,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,167 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1453) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,167 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table314
2023-07-17 21:53:13,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,167 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table314) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,168 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table556
2023-07-17 21:53:13,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,168 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table556) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,168 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table798
2023-07-17 21:53:13,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,169 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table798) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,169 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table315
2023-07-17 21:53:13,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,170 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table315) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,170 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table557
2023-07-17 21:53:13,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,170 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table557) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,171 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table799
2023-07-17 21:53:13,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,171 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table799) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,171 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table316
2023-07-17 21:53:13,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,172 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table316) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,172 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table558
2023-07-17 21:53:13,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,173 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table558) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,173 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table317
2023-07-17 21:53:13,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,174 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table317) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,174 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table559
2023-07-17 21:53:13,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,174 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table559) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,174 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table318
2023-07-17 21:53:13,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,175 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table318) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,175 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table319
2023-07-17 21:53:13,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,176 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table319) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,176 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1212
2023-07-17 21:53:13,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,177 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1212) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,177 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1454
2023-07-17 21:53:13,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,177 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1454) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,177 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1213
2023-07-17 21:53:13,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,178 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1213) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,178 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1455
2023-07-17 21:53:13,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,179 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1455) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,179 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table40
2023-07-17 21:53:13,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,179 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table40) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,179 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1214
2023-07-17 21:53:13,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,180 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1214) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,180 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1456
2023-07-17 21:53:13,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,181 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1456) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,181 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table41
2023-07-17 21:53:13,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,181 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table41) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,181 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1215
2023-07-17 21:53:13,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,182 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1215) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,182 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1457
2023-07-17 21:53:13,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,183 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1457) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,183 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table42
2023-07-17 21:53:13,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,183 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table42) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,184 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1216
2023-07-17 21:53:13,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,184 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1216) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,184 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1458
2023-07-17 21:53:13,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,185 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1458) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,185 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table43
2023-07-17 21:53:13,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,186 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table43) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,186 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1217
2023-07-17 21:53:13,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,186 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1217) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,187 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1459
2023-07-17 21:53:13,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,187 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1459) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,187 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table44
2023-07-17 21:53:13,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,188 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table44) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,188 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1218
2023-07-17 21:53:13,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,189 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1218) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,189 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table45
2023-07-17 21:53:13,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,189 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table45) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,190 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1219
2023-07-17 21:53:13,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,190 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1219) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,190 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table35
2023-07-17 21:53:13,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,191 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table35) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,191 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table581
2023-07-17 21:53:13,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,192 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table581) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,192 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table36
2023-07-17 21:53:13,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,192 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table36) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,192 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table340
2023-07-17 21:53:13,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,193 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table340) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,193 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table582
2023-07-17 21:53:13,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,194 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table582) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,194 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table37
2023-07-17 21:53:13,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,195 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table37) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,195 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table341
2023-07-17 21:53:13,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,195 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table341) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,195 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table583
2023-07-17 21:53:13,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,196 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table583) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,196 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table38
2023-07-17 21:53:13,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,197 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table38) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,197 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table100
2023-07-17 21:53:13,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,198 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table100) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,198 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table342
2023-07-17 21:53:13,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,198 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table342) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,198 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table584
2023-07-17 21:53:13,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,199 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table584) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,199 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table39
2023-07-17 21:53:13,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,200 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table39) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,200 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table101
2023-07-17 21:53:13,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,200 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table101) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,200 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table343
2023-07-17 21:53:13,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,201 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table343) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,201 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table585
2023-07-17 21:53:13,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,202 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table585) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,202 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table102
2023-07-17 21:53:13,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,203 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table102) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,203 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table344
2023-07-17 21:53:13,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,204 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table344) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,204 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table586
2023-07-17 21:53:13,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,204 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table586) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,204 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1440
2023-07-17 21:53:13,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,205 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1440) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,205 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table103
2023-07-17 21:53:13,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,206 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table103) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,206 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table345
2023-07-17 21:53:13,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,206 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table345) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,207 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table587
2023-07-17 21:53:13,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,207 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table587) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,207 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1441
2023-07-17 21:53:13,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,208 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1441) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,208 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table104
2023-07-17 21:53:13,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,209 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table104) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,209 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table346
2023-07-17 21:53:13,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,209 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table346) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,209 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table588
2023-07-17 21:53:13,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,210 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table588) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,210 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1200
2023-07-17 21:53:13,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,211 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1200) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,211 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1442
2023-07-17 21:53:13,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,211 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1442) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,211 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table105
2023-07-17 21:53:13,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,212 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table105) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,212 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table347
2023-07-17 21:53:13,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,213 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table347) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,213 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table589
2023-07-17 21:53:13,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,213 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table589) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,213 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table106
2023-07-17 21:53:13,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,214 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table106) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,214 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table348
2023-07-17 21:53:13,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,215 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table348) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,215 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table107
2023-07-17 21:53:13,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,215 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table107) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,216 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table349
2023-07-17 21:53:13,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,216 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table349) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,216 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table108
2023-07-17 21:53:13,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,217 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table108) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,217 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table109
2023-07-17 21:53:13,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,218 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table109) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,218 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1209
2023-07-17 21:53:13,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,219 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1209) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,219 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1201
2023-07-17 21:53:13,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,220 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1201) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,220 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1443
2023-07-17 21:53:13,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,221 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1443) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,221 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1202
2023-07-17 21:53:13,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,221 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1202) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,221 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1444
2023-07-17 21:53:13,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,222 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1444) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,222 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1203
2023-07-17 21:53:13,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,223 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1203) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,223 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1445
2023-07-17 21:53:13,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,224 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1445) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,224 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table30
2023-07-17 21:53:13,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,225 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table30) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,225 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1204
2023-07-17 21:53:13,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,225 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1204) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,225 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1446
2023-07-17 21:53:13,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,226 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1446) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,226 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table31
2023-07-17 21:53:13,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,227 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table31) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,227 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1205
2023-07-17 21:53:13,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,227 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1205) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,227 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1447
2023-07-17 21:53:13,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,228 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1447) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,228 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table32
2023-07-17 21:53:13,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,228 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table32) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,228 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1206
2023-07-17 21:53:13,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,229 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1206) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,229 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1448
2023-07-17 21:53:13,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,229 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1448) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,229 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table33
2023-07-17 21:53:13,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,230 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table33) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,230 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table590
2023-07-17 21:53:13,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,230 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table590) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,230 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1207
2023-07-17 21:53:13,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,230 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1207) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,231 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1449
2023-07-17 21:53:13,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,231 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1449) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,231 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table34
2023-07-17 21:53:13,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,231 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table34) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,231 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table591
2023-07-17 21:53:13,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,232 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table591) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,232 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1208
2023-07-17 21:53:13,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,232 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1208) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,232 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table24
2023-07-17 21:53:13,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,233 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table24) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,233 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table570
2023-07-17 21:53:13,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,234 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table570) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,234 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table25
2023-07-17 21:53:13,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,234 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table25) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,234 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table571
2023-07-17 21:53:13,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,235 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table571) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,235 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table26
2023-07-17 21:53:13,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,235 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table26) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,235 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table330
2023-07-17 21:53:13,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,235 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table330) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,235 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table572
2023-07-17 21:53:13,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,236 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table572) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,236 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table27
2023-07-17 21:53:13,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,236 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table27) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,236 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table331
2023-07-17 21:53:13,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,237 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table331) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,237 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table573
2023-07-17 21:53:13,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,237 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table573) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,237 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table28
2023-07-17 21:53:13,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,238 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table28) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,238 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table332
2023-07-17 21:53:13,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,238 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table332) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,238 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table574
2023-07-17 21:53:13,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,239 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table574) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,239 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table29
2023-07-17 21:53:13,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,239 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table29) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,239 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table333
2023-07-17 21:53:13,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,239 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table333) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,239 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table575
2023-07-17 21:53:13,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,240 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table575) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,240 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table334
2023-07-17 21:53:13,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,240 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table334) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,240 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table576
2023-07-17 21:53:13,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,241 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table576) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,241 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1430
2023-07-17 21:53:13,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,241 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1430) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,241 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table335
2023-07-17 21:53:13,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,242 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table335) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,242 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table577
2023-07-17 21:53:13,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,242 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table577) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,242 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1431
2023-07-17 21:53:13,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,243 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1431) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,243 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table336
2023-07-17 21:53:13,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,243 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table336) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,244 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table578
2023-07-17 21:53:13,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,244 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table578) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,244 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table337
2023-07-17 21:53:13,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,244 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table337) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,244 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table579
2023-07-17 21:53:13,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,245 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table579) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,245 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table338
2023-07-17 21:53:13,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,245 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table338) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,245 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table339
2023-07-17 21:53:13,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,246 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table339) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,246 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1432
2023-07-17 21:53:13,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,246 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1432) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,246 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1433
2023-07-17 21:53:13,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,247 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1433) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,247 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1434
2023-07-17 21:53:13,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,247 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1434) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,247 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1435
2023-07-17 21:53:13,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,247 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1435) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,247 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table20
2023-07-17 21:53:13,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,248 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table20) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,248 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1436
2023-07-17 21:53:13,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,248 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1436) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,248 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table21
2023-07-17 21:53:13,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,249 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table21) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,249 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1437
2023-07-17 21:53:13,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,249 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1437) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,249 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table22
2023-07-17 21:53:13,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,250 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table22) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,250 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1438
2023-07-17 21:53:13,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,250 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1438) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,250 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table23
2023-07-17 21:53:13,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,251 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table23) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,251 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table580
2023-07-17 21:53:13,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,251 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table580) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,251 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1439
2023-07-17 21:53:13,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,251 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1439) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,252 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table284
2023-07-17 21:53:13,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,252 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table284) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,252 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table285
2023-07-17 21:53:13,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,252 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table285) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,252 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table286
2023-07-17 21:53:13,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,253 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table286) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,253 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table287
2023-07-17 21:53:13,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,254 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table287) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,254 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table288
2023-07-17 21:53:13,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,254 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table288) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,254 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table289
2023-07-17 21:53:13,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,255 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table289) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,255 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table290
2023-07-17 21:53:13,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,255 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table290) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,255 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table291
2023-07-17 21:53:13,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,256 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table291) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,256 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table292
2023-07-17 21:53:13,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,256 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table292) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,256 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table293
2023-07-17 21:53:13,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,256 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table293) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,257 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table294
2023-07-17 21:53:13,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,257 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table294) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,257 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table273
2023-07-17 21:53:13,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,257 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table273) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,257 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table274
2023-07-17 21:53:13,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,258 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table274) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,258 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table275
2023-07-17 21:53:13,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,258 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table275) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,258 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table276
2023-07-17 21:53:13,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,259 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table276) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,259 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table277
2023-07-17 21:53:13,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,259 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table277) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,259 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table278
2023-07-17 21:53:13,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,260 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table278) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,260 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table279
2023-07-17 21:53:13,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,260 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table279) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,260 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table280
2023-07-17 21:53:13,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,260 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table280) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,261 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table281
2023-07-17 21:53:13,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,261 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table281) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,261 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table282
2023-07-17 21:53:13,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,261 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table282) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,261 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table283
2023-07-17 21:53:13,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,262 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table283) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,262 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table295
2023-07-17 21:53:13,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,262 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table295) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,262 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table296
2023-07-17 21:53:13,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,263 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table296) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,263 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table297
2023-07-17 21:53:13,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,263 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table297) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,263 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table298
2023-07-17 21:53:13,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,264 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table298) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,264 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table299
2023-07-17 21:53:13,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,265 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table299) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,265 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table920
2023-07-17 21:53:13,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,265 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table920) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,265 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table921
2023-07-17 21:53:13,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,265 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table921) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,265 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table922
2023-07-17 21:53:13,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,266 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table922) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,266 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table923
2023-07-17 21:53:13,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,266 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table923) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,266 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table924
2023-07-17 21:53:13,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,267 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table924) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,267 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table925
2023-07-17 21:53:13,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,267 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table925) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,267 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table926
2023-07-17 21:53:13,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,268 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table926) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,268 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table927
2023-07-17 21:53:13,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,268 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table927) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,268 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table928
2023-07-17 21:53:13,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,268 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table928) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,269 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table929
2023-07-17 21:53:13,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,269 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table929) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,269 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1094
2023-07-17 21:53:13,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,269 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1094) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,269 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1095
2023-07-17 21:53:13,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,270 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1095) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,270 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1096
2023-07-17 21:53:13,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,270 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1096) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,270 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1097
2023-07-17 21:53:13,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,271 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1097) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,271 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1098
2023-07-17 21:53:13,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,271 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1098) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,271 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1099
2023-07-17 21:53:13,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,271 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1099) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,272 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table910
2023-07-17 21:53:13,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,272 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table910) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,272 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table911
2023-07-17 21:53:13,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,272 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table911) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,272 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table912
2023-07-17 21:53:13,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,273 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table912) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,273 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1090
2023-07-17 21:53:13,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,274 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1090) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,274 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table913
2023-07-17 21:53:13,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,275 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table913) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,275 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1091
2023-07-17 21:53:13,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,275 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1091) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,275 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table914
2023-07-17 21:53:13,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,276 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table914) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,276 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1092
2023-07-17 21:53:13,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,276 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1092) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,276 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table915
2023-07-17 21:53:13,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,276 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table915) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,276 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1093
2023-07-17 21:53:13,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,277 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1093) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,277 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table916
2023-07-17 21:53:13,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,277 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table916) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,277 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table917
2023-07-17 21:53:13,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,278 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table917) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,278 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table918
2023-07-17 21:53:13,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,278 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table918) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,278 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table919
2023-07-17 21:53:13,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,279 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table919) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,279 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1083
2023-07-17 21:53:13,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,279 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1083) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,279 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1084
2023-07-17 21:53:13,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,279 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1084) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,280 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1085
2023-07-17 21:53:13,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,280 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1085) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,280 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1086
2023-07-17 21:53:13,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,281 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1086) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,281 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1087
2023-07-17 21:53:13,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,281 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1087) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,281 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1088
2023-07-17 21:53:13,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,282 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1088) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,282 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1089
2023-07-17 21:53:13,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,283 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1089) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,283 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table940
2023-07-17 21:53:13,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,284 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table940) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,284 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table941
2023-07-17 21:53:13,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,284 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table941) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,285 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table700
2023-07-17 21:53:13,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,285 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table700) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,285 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table942
2023-07-17 21:53:13,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,286 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table942) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,286 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table701
2023-07-17 21:53:13,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,287 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table701) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,287 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table943
2023-07-17 21:53:13,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,287 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table943) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,288 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table702
2023-07-17 21:53:13,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,288 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table702) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,288 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table944
2023-07-17 21:53:13,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,288 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table944) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,288 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table703
2023-07-17 21:53:13,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,289 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table703) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,289 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table945
2023-07-17 21:53:13,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,289 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table945) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,289 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table704
2023-07-17 21:53:13,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,290 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table704) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,290 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table946
2023-07-17 21:53:13,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,290 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table946) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,290 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1080
2023-07-17 21:53:13,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,291 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1080) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,291 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table705
2023-07-17 21:53:13,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,291 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table705) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,291 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table947
2023-07-17 21:53:13,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,291 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table947) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,291 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1081
2023-07-17 21:53:13,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,292 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1081) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,292 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table706
2023-07-17 21:53:13,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,292 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table706) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,292 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table948
2023-07-17 21:53:13,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,293 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table948) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,293 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1082
2023-07-17 21:53:13,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,293 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1082) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,293 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table707
2023-07-17 21:53:13,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,294 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table707) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,294 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table949
2023-07-17 21:53:13,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,294 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table949) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,294 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table708
2023-07-17 21:53:13,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,295 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table708) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,295 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table709
2023-07-17 21:53:13,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,295 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table709) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,295 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1072
2023-07-17 21:53:13,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,295 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1072) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,295 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1073
2023-07-17 21:53:13,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,296 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1073) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,296 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1074
2023-07-17 21:53:13,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,296 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1074) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,296 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1075
2023-07-17 21:53:13,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,297 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1075) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,297 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1076
2023-07-17 21:53:13,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,298 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1076) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,298 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1077
2023-07-17 21:53:13,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,298 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1077) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,298 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1078
2023-07-17 21:53:13,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,298 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1078) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,298 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1079
2023-07-17 21:53:13,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,299 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1079) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,299 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table930
2023-07-17 21:53:13,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,299 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table930) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,299 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table931
2023-07-17 21:53:13,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,300 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table931) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,300 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table932
2023-07-17 21:53:13,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,300 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table932) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,300 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table933
2023-07-17 21:53:13,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,301 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table933) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,301 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table934
2023-07-17 21:53:13,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,301 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table934) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,301 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table935
2023-07-17 21:53:13,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,301 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table935) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,301 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table936
2023-07-17 21:53:13,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,302 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table936) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,302 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1070
2023-07-17 21:53:13,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,302 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1070) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,302 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table937
2023-07-17 21:53:13,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,303 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table937) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,303 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1071
2023-07-17 21:53:13,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,303 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1071) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,303 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table938
2023-07-17 21:53:13,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,304 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table938) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,304 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table939
2023-07-17 21:53:13,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,304 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table939) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,304 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table900
2023-07-17 21:53:13,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,305 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table900) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,305 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table901
2023-07-17 21:53:13,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,305 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table901) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,305 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table902
2023-07-17 21:53:13,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,305 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table902) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,305 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table903
2023-07-17 21:53:13,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,306 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table903) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,306 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table904
2023-07-17 21:53:13,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,306 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table904) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,306 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table905
2023-07-17 21:53:13,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,307 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table905) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,307 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table906
2023-07-17 21:53:13,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,308 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table906) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,308 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table907
2023-07-17 21:53:13,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,308 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table907) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,308 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table908
2023-07-17 21:53:13,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,308 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table908) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,308 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table909
2023-07-17 21:53:13,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1102514985=0, srv12011761=1, srv1981282195=3, srv2003652633=4, srv1398947207=2, srv2110614049=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,309 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table909) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,348 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1380
2023-07-17 21:53:13,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,349 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1380) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,349 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1381
2023-07-17 21:53:13,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,350 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1381) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,350 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table880
2023-07-17 21:53:13,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,351 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table880) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,351 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1140
2023-07-17 21:53:13,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,352 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1140) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,352 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1382
2023-07-17 21:53:13,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,352 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1382) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,353 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table881
2023-07-17 21:53:13,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,353 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table881) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,353 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1141
2023-07-17 21:53:13,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,354 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1141) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,354 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1383
2023-07-17 21:53:13,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,355 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1383) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,355 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table640
2023-07-17 21:53:13,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,356 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table640) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,356 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table882
2023-07-17 21:53:13,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,356 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table882) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,356 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1142
2023-07-17 21:53:13,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,357 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1142) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,357 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1384
2023-07-17 21:53:13,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,358 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1384) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,358 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table641
2023-07-17 21:53:13,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,359 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table641) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,359 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table883
2023-07-17 21:53:13,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,359 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table883) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,359 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1143
2023-07-17 21:53:13,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,360 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1143) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,360 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1385
2023-07-17 21:53:13,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,361 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1385) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,361 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table400
2023-07-17 21:53:13,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,362 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table400) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,362 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table642
2023-07-17 21:53:13,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,362 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table642) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,363 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table884
2023-07-17 21:53:13,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,363 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table884) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,363 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1144
2023-07-17 21:53:13,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,364 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1144) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,364 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1386
2023-07-17 21:53:13,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,365 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1386) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,365 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table401
2023-07-17 21:53:13,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,366 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table401) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,366 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table643
2023-07-17 21:53:13,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,366 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table643) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,366 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table885
2023-07-17 21:53:13,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,367 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table885) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,367 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1145
2023-07-17 21:53:13,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,368 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1145) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,368 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1387
2023-07-17 21:53:13,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,369 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1387) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,369 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table402
2023-07-17 21:53:13,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,369 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table402) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,369 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table644
2023-07-17 21:53:13,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,370 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table644) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,370 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table886
2023-07-17 21:53:13,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,371 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table886) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,371 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table403
2023-07-17 21:53:13,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,372 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table403) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,372 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table645
2023-07-17 21:53:13,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,372 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table645) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,373 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table887
2023-07-17 21:53:13,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,373 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table887) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,373 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table404
2023-07-17 21:53:13,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,374 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table404) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,374 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table646
2023-07-17 21:53:13,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,375 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table646) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,375 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table888
2023-07-17 21:53:13,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,375 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table888) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,376 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table405
2023-07-17 21:53:13,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,376 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table405) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,376 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table647
2023-07-17 21:53:13,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,377 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table647) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,377 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table889
2023-07-17 21:53:13,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,378 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table889) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,378 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table406
2023-07-17 21:53:13,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,378 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table406) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,379 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table648
2023-07-17 21:53:13,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,379 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table648) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,379 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table407
2023-07-17 21:53:13,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,380 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table407) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,380 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table649
2023-07-17 21:53:13,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,381 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table649) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,381 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table408
2023-07-17 21:53:13,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,381 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table408) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,381 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table409
2023-07-17 21:53:13,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,382 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table409) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,382 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1146
2023-07-17 21:53:13,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,383 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1146) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,383 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1388
2023-07-17 21:53:13,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,383 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1388) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,383 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1147
2023-07-17 21:53:13,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,384 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1147) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,384 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1389
2023-07-17 21:53:13,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,385 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1389) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,385 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1148
2023-07-17 21:53:13,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,385 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1148) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,385 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1149
2023-07-17 21:53:13,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,386 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1149) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,386 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1370
2023-07-17 21:53:13,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,387 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1370) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,387 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1371
2023-07-17 21:53:13,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,387 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1371) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,388 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table870
2023-07-17 21:53:13,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,388 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table870) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,388 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1130
2023-07-17 21:53:13,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,389 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1130) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,389 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1372
2023-07-17 21:53:13,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,390 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1372) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,390 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table871
2023-07-17 21:53:13,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,390 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table871) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,390 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1131
2023-07-17 21:53:13,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,391 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1131) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,391 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1373
2023-07-17 21:53:13,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,391 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1373) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,392 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table630
2023-07-17 21:53:13,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,392 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table630) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,392 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table872
2023-07-17 21:53:13,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,393 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table872) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,393 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1132
2023-07-17 21:53:13,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,393 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1132) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,393 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1374
2023-07-17 21:53:13,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,394 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1374) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,394 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table631
2023-07-17 21:53:13,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,395 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table631) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,395 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table873
2023-07-17 21:53:13,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,395 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table873) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,395 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1133
2023-07-17 21:53:13,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,396 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1133) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,396 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1375
2023-07-17 21:53:13,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,396 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1375) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,396 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table632
2023-07-17 21:53:13,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,396 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table632) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,397 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table874
2023-07-17 21:53:13,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,397 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table874) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,397 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1134
2023-07-17 21:53:13,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,397 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1134) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,397 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1376
2023-07-17 21:53:13,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,398 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1376) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,398 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table633
2023-07-17 21:53:13,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,398 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table633) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,398 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table875
2023-07-17 21:53:13,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,399 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table875) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,399 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table634
2023-07-17 21:53:13,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,399 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table634) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,399 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table876
2023-07-17 21:53:13,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,400 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table876) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,400 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table635
2023-07-17 21:53:13,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,400 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table635) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,400 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table877
2023-07-17 21:53:13,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,400 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table877) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,400 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table636
2023-07-17 21:53:13,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,401 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table636) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,401 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table878
2023-07-17 21:53:13,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,401 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table878) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,401 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table637
2023-07-17 21:53:13,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,402 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table637) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,402 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table879
2023-07-17 21:53:13,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,402 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table879) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,402 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table638
2023-07-17 21:53:13,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,403 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table638) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,403 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table639
2023-07-17 21:53:13,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,403 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table639) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,403 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1135
2023-07-17 21:53:13,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,403 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1135) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,403 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1377
2023-07-17 21:53:13,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,404 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1377) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,404 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1136
2023-07-17 21:53:13,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,405 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1136) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,405 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1378
2023-07-17 21:53:13,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,405 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1378) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,405 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1137
2023-07-17 21:53:13,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,405 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1137) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,406 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1379
2023-07-17 21:53:13,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,406 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1379) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,406 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1138
2023-07-17 21:53:13,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,406 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1138) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,406 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1139
2023-07-17 21:53:13,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,407 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1139) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,407 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table660
2023-07-17 21:53:13,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,407 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table660) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,407 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1360
2023-07-17 21:53:13,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,408 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1360) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,408 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table661
2023-07-17 21:53:13,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,408 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table661) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,408 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1361
2023-07-17 21:53:13,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,409 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1361) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,409 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table420
2023-07-17 21:53:13,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,409 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table420) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,409 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table662
2023-07-17 21:53:13,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,409 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table662) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,409 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1120
2023-07-17 21:53:13,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,410 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1120) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,410 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1362
2023-07-17 21:53:13,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,410 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1362) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,410 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table421
2023-07-17 21:53:13,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,411 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table421) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,412 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table663
2023-07-17 21:53:13,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,412 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table663) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,412 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1121
2023-07-17 21:53:13,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,412 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1121) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,412 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1363
2023-07-17 21:53:13,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,413 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1363) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,413 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table422
2023-07-17 21:53:13,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,413 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table422) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,413 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table664
2023-07-17 21:53:13,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,414 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table664) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,414 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1122
2023-07-17 21:53:13,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,414 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1122) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,414 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1364
2023-07-17 21:53:13,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,415 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1364) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,415 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table423
2023-07-17 21:53:13,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,415 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table423) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,415 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table665
2023-07-17 21:53:13,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,416 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table665) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,416 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1123
2023-07-17 21:53:13,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,416 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1123) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,416 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1365
2023-07-17 21:53:13,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,417 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1365) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,417 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table424
2023-07-17 21:53:13,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,417 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table424) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,417 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table666
2023-07-17 21:53:13,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,417 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table666) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,417 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table425
2023-07-17 21:53:13,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,418 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table425) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,418 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table667
2023-07-17 21:53:13,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,418 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table667) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,418 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table426
2023-07-17 21:53:13,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,419 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table426) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,419 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table668
2023-07-17 21:53:13,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,419 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table668) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,419 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table427
2023-07-17 21:53:13,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,420 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table427) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,420 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table669
2023-07-17 21:53:13,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,420 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table669) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,420 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table428
2023-07-17 21:53:13,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,420 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table428) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,421 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table429
2023-07-17 21:53:13,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,421 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table429) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,421 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1124
2023-07-17 21:53:13,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,421 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1124) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,421 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1366
2023-07-17 21:53:13,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,422 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1366) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,422 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1125
2023-07-17 21:53:13,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,422 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1125) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,422 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1367
2023-07-17 21:53:13,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,423 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1367) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,423 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1126
2023-07-17 21:53:13,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,423 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1126) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,423 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1368
2023-07-17 21:53:13,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,424 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1368) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,424 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1127
2023-07-17 21:53:13,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,424 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1127) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,424 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1369
2023-07-17 21:53:13,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,424 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1369) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,425 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1128
2023-07-17 21:53:13,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,425 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1128) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,425 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1129
2023-07-17 21:53:13,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,425 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1129) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,425 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table890
2023-07-17 21:53:13,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,426 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table890) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,426 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table891
2023-07-17 21:53:13,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,426 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table891) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,426 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table650
2023-07-17 21:53:13,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,427 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table650) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,427 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table892
2023-07-17 21:53:13,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,427 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table892) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,427 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1350
2023-07-17 21:53:13,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,428 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1350) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,428 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table651
2023-07-17 21:53:13,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,428 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table651) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,428 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table893
2023-07-17 21:53:13,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,428 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table893) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,428 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1351
2023-07-17 21:53:13,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,429 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1351) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,429 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table410
2023-07-17 21:53:13,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,429 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table410) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,429 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table652
2023-07-17 21:53:13,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,430 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table652) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,430 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table894
2023-07-17 21:53:13,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,430 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table894) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,430 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1110
2023-07-17 21:53:13,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,431 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1110) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,431 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1352
2023-07-17 21:53:13,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,431 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1352) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,431 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table411
2023-07-17 21:53:13,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,432 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table411) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,432 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table653
2023-07-17 21:53:13,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,432 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table653) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,432 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table895
2023-07-17 21:53:13,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,432 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table895) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,432 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1111
2023-07-17 21:53:13,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,433 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1111) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,433 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1353
2023-07-17 21:53:13,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,433 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1353) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,433 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table412
2023-07-17 21:53:13,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,434 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table412) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,434 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table654
2023-07-17 21:53:13,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,434 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table654) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,434 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table896
2023-07-17 21:53:13,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,435 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table896) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,435 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1112
2023-07-17 21:53:13,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,435 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1112) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,435 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1354
2023-07-17 21:53:13,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,436 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1354) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,436 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table413
2023-07-17 21:53:13,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,436 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table413) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,436 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table655
2023-07-17 21:53:13,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,437 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table655) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,437 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table897
2023-07-17 21:53:13,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,437 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table897) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,437 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table414
2023-07-17 21:53:13,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,438 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table414) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,438 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table656
2023-07-17 21:53:13,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,438 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table656) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,438 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table898
2023-07-17 21:53:13,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,438 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table898) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,439 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table415
2023-07-17 21:53:13,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,439 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table415) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,439 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table657
2023-07-17 21:53:13,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,439 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table657) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,439 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table899
2023-07-17 21:53:13,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,440 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table899) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,440 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table416
2023-07-17 21:53:13,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,440 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table416) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,440 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table658
2023-07-17 21:53:13,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,441 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table658) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,441 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table417
2023-07-17 21:53:13,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,441 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table417) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,441 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table659
2023-07-17 21:53:13,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,442 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table659) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,442 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table418
2023-07-17 21:53:13,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,442 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table418) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,442 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table419
2023-07-17 21:53:13,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,442 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table419) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,443 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1113
2023-07-17 21:53:13,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,443 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1113) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,443 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1355
2023-07-17 21:53:13,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,444 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1355) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,444 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1114
2023-07-17 21:53:13,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,444 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1114) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,444 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1356
2023-07-17 21:53:13,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,445 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1356) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,445 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1115
2023-07-17 21:53:13,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,445 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1115) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,445 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1357
2023-07-17 21:53:13,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,446 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1357) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,446 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1116
2023-07-17 21:53:13,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,446 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1116) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,446 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1358
2023-07-17 21:53:13,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,447 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1358) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,447 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1117
2023-07-17 21:53:13,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,447 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1117) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,447 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1359
2023-07-17 21:53:13,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,448 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1359) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,448 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1118
2023-07-17 21:53:13,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,448 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1118) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,448 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1119
2023-07-17 21:53:13,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,448 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1119) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,449 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1182
2023-07-17 21:53:13,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,449 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1182) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,449 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1183
2023-07-17 21:53:13,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,449 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1183) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,450 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1184
2023-07-17 21:53:13,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,450 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1184) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,450 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1185
2023-07-17 21:53:13,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,451 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1185) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,451 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1186
2023-07-17 21:53:13,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,452 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1186) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,452 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1187
2023-07-17 21:53:13,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,452 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1187) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,452 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table840
2023-07-17 21:53:13,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,453 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table840) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,453 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1188
2023-07-17 21:53:13,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,454 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1188) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,454 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table841
2023-07-17 21:53:13,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,454 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table841) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,455 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1189
2023-07-17 21:53:13,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,455 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1189) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,455 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table600
2023-07-17 21:53:13,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,456 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table600) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,456 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table842
2023-07-17 21:53:13,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,457 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table842) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,457 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table601
2023-07-17 21:53:13,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,457 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table601) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,457 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table843
2023-07-17 21:53:13,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,458 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table843) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,458 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table602
2023-07-17 21:53:13,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,459 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table602) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,459 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table844
2023-07-17 21:53:13,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,459 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table844) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,459 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table603
2023-07-17 21:53:13,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,459 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table603) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,460 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table845
2023-07-17 21:53:13,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,460 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table845) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,460 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table604
2023-07-17 21:53:13,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,460 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table604) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,460 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table846
2023-07-17 21:53:13,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,461 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table846) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,461 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table605
2023-07-17 21:53:13,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,461 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table605) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,461 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table847
2023-07-17 21:53:13,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,462 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table847) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,462 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table606
2023-07-17 21:53:13,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,462 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table606) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,462 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table848
2023-07-17 21:53:13,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,463 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table848) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,463 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1180
2023-07-17 21:53:13,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,463 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1180) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,463 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table607
2023-07-17 21:53:13,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,463 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table607) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,464 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table849
2023-07-17 21:53:13,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,464 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table849) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,464 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1181
2023-07-17 21:53:13,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,464 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1181) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,464 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table608
2023-07-17 21:53:13,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,465 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table608) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,465 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table609
2023-07-17 21:53:13,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,465 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table609) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,465 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1171
2023-07-17 21:53:13,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,466 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1171) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,466 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1172
2023-07-17 21:53:13,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,466 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1172) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,466 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1173
2023-07-17 21:53:13,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,466 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1173) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,467 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1174
2023-07-17 21:53:13,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,467 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1174) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,467 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1175
2023-07-17 21:53:13,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,467 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1175) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,467 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1176
2023-07-17 21:53:13,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,468 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1176) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,468 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1177
2023-07-17 21:53:13,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,469 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1177) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,469 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table830
2023-07-17 21:53:13,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,469 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table830) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,469 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1178
2023-07-17 21:53:13,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,470 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1178) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,470 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table831
2023-07-17 21:53:13,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,470 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table831) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,470 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table832
2023-07-17 21:53:13,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,470 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table832) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,470 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table833
2023-07-17 21:53:13,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,471 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table833) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,471 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table834
2023-07-17 21:53:13,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,471 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table834) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,471 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table835
2023-07-17 21:53:13,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,472 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table835) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,472 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table836
2023-07-17 21:53:13,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,472 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table836) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,472 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table837
2023-07-17 21:53:13,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,473 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table837) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,473 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table838
2023-07-17 21:53:13,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,473 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table838) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,473 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1170
2023-07-17 21:53:13,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,473 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1170) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,473 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table839
2023-07-17 21:53:13,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,474 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table839) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,474 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1179
2023-07-17 21:53:13,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,474 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1179) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,474 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1160
2023-07-17 21:53:13,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,475 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1160) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,475 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1161
2023-07-17 21:53:13,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,475 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1161) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,475 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1162
2023-07-17 21:53:13,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,476 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1162) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,476 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1163
2023-07-17 21:53:13,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,476 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1163) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,476 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table860
2023-07-17 21:53:13,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,476 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table860) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,476 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1164
2023-07-17 21:53:13,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,477 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1164) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,477 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table861
2023-07-17 21:53:13,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,477 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table861) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,477 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1165
2023-07-17 21:53:13,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,478 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1165) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,478 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table620
2023-07-17 21:53:13,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,479 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table620) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,479 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table862
2023-07-17 21:53:13,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,479 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table862) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,479 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1166
2023-07-17 21:53:13,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,480 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1166) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,480 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table621
2023-07-17 21:53:13,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,480 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table621) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,480 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table863
2023-07-17 21:53:13,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,480 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table863) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,480 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1167
2023-07-17 21:53:13,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,481 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1167) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,481 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table622
2023-07-17 21:53:13,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,481 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table622) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,481 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table864
2023-07-17 21:53:13,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,482 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table864) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,482 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table623
2023-07-17 21:53:13,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,482 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table623) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,482 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table865
2023-07-17 21:53:13,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,483 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table865) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,483 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table624
2023-07-17 21:53:13,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,483 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table624) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,483 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table866
2023-07-17 21:53:13,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,483 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table866) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,483 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table625
2023-07-17 21:53:13,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,484 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table625) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,484 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table867
2023-07-17 21:53:13,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,484 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table867) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,484 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table626
2023-07-17 21:53:13,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,485 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table626) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,485 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table868
2023-07-17 21:53:13,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,485 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table868) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,485 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table627
2023-07-17 21:53:13,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,486 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table627) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,486 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table869
2023-07-17 21:53:13,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,486 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table869) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,486 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table628
2023-07-17 21:53:13,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,486 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table628) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,487 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table629
2023-07-17 21:53:13,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,487 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table629) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,487 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1168
2023-07-17 21:53:13,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,487 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1168) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,487 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1169
2023-07-17 21:53:13,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,488 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1169) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,488 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1391
2023-07-17 21:53:13,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,489 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1391) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,489 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1150
2023-07-17 21:53:13,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,489 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1150) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,489 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1392
2023-07-17 21:53:13,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,490 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1392) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,490 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1151
2023-07-17 21:53:13,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,490 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1151) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,490 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1393
2023-07-17 21:53:13,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,490 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1393) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,490 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1152
2023-07-17 21:53:13,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,491 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1152) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,491 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1394
2023-07-17 21:53:13,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,491 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1394) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,491 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1153
2023-07-17 21:53:13,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,492 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1153) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,492 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1395
2023-07-17 21:53:13,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,492 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1395) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,492 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table850
2023-07-17 21:53:13,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,493 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table850) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,493 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1154
2023-07-17 21:53:13,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,493 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1154) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,493 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1396
2023-07-17 21:53:13,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,493 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1396) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,494 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table851
2023-07-17 21:53:13,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,494 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table851) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,494 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1155
2023-07-17 21:53:13,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,494 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1155) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,494 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1397
2023-07-17 21:53:13,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,495 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1397) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,495 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table610
2023-07-17 21:53:13,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,495 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table610) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,495 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table852
2023-07-17 21:53:13,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,496 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table852) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,496 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1156
2023-07-17 21:53:13,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,496 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1156) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,496 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1398
2023-07-17 21:53:13,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,496 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1398) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,497 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table611
2023-07-17 21:53:13,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,497 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table611) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,497 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table853
2023-07-17 21:53:13,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,497 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table853) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,497 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table612
2023-07-17 21:53:13,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,498 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table612) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,498 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table854
2023-07-17 21:53:13,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,499 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table854) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,499 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table613
2023-07-17 21:53:13,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,499 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table613) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,499 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table855
2023-07-17 21:53:13,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,500 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table855) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,500 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table614
2023-07-17 21:53:13,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,500 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table614) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,500 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table856
2023-07-17 21:53:13,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,500 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table856) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,500 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table615
2023-07-17 21:53:13,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,501 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table615) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,501 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table857
2023-07-17 21:53:13,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,501 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table857) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,501 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table616
2023-07-17 21:53:13,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,502 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table616) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,502 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table858
2023-07-17 21:53:13,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,502 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table858) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,502 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table617
2023-07-17 21:53:13,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,503 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table617) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,503 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table859
2023-07-17 21:53:13,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,503 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table859) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,503 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table618
2023-07-17 21:53:13,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,503 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table618) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,504 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1390
2023-07-17 21:53:13,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,504 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1390) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,504 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table619
2023-07-17 21:53:13,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,504 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table619) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,504 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1157
2023-07-17 21:53:13,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,505 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1157) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,505 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1399
2023-07-17 21:53:13,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,505 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1399) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,505 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1158
2023-07-17 21:53:13,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,506 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1158) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,506 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1159
2023-07-17 21:53:13,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,506 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1159) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,506 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table240
2023-07-17 21:53:13,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,507 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table240) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,507 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table482
2023-07-17 21:53:13,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,507 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table482) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,507 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table241
2023-07-17 21:53:13,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,508 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table241) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,508 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table483
2023-07-17 21:53:13,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,508 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table483) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,508 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table242
2023-07-17 21:53:13,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,509 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table242) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,509 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table484
2023-07-17 21:53:13,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,509 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table484) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,509 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table243
2023-07-17 21:53:13,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,510 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table243) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,510 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table485
2023-07-17 21:53:13,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,510 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table485) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,510 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table244
2023-07-17 21:53:13,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,511 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table244) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,511 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table486
2023-07-17 21:53:13,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,511 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table486) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,511 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table245
2023-07-17 21:53:13,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,512 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table245) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,512 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table487
2023-07-17 21:53:13,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,512 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table487) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,512 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table246
2023-07-17 21:53:13,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,513 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table246) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,513 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table488
2023-07-17 21:53:13,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,513 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table488) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,513 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table247
2023-07-17 21:53:13,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,513 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table247) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,513 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table489
2023-07-17 21:53:13,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,514 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table489) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,514 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table248
2023-07-17 21:53:13,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,514 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table248) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,514 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table249
2023-07-17 21:53:13,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,515 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table249) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,515 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1308
2023-07-17 21:53:13,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,515 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1308) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,515 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1309
2023-07-17 21:53:13,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,516 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1309) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,516 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1300
2023-07-17 21:53:13,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,516 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1300) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,516 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1301
2023-07-17 21:53:13,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,517 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1301) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,517 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1302
2023-07-17 21:53:13,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,517 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1302) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,517 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1303
2023-07-17 21:53:13,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,517 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1303) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,517 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1304
2023-07-17 21:53:13,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,518 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1304) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,518 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table490
2023-07-17 21:53:13,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,518 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table490) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,519 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1305
2023-07-17 21:53:13,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,519 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1305) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,519 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table491
2023-07-17 21:53:13,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,520 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table491) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,520 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1306
2023-07-17 21:53:13,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,520 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1306) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,520 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table250
2023-07-17 21:53:13,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,521 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table250) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,521 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table492
2023-07-17 21:53:13,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,521 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table492) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,521 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1307
2023-07-17 21:53:13,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,521 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1307) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,522 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table471
2023-07-17 21:53:13,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,522 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table471) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,522 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table230
2023-07-17 21:53:13,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,522 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table230) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,522 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table472
2023-07-17 21:53:13,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,523 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table472) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,523 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table231
2023-07-17 21:53:13,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,523 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table231) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,523 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table473
2023-07-17 21:53:13,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,524 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table473) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,524 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table232
2023-07-17 21:53:13,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,524 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table232) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,524 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table474
2023-07-17 21:53:13,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,525 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table474) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,525 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table233
2023-07-17 21:53:13,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,525 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table233) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,525 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table475
2023-07-17 21:53:13,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,526 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table475) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,526 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table234
2023-07-17 21:53:13,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,526 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table234) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,526 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table476
2023-07-17 21:53:13,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,526 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table476) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,527 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table235
2023-07-17 21:53:13,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,527 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table235) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,527 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table477
2023-07-17 21:53:13,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,527 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table477) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,527 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table236
2023-07-17 21:53:13,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,528 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table236) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,528 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table478
2023-07-17 21:53:13,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,528 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table478) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,528 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table237
2023-07-17 21:53:13,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,529 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table237) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,529 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table479
2023-07-17 21:53:13,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,530 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table479) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,530 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table238
2023-07-17 21:53:13,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,530 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table238) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,530 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table239
2023-07-17 21:53:13,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,531 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table239) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,531 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table480
2023-07-17 21:53:13,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,531 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table480) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,531 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table481
2023-07-17 21:53:13,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,532 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table481) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,532 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table262
2023-07-17 21:53:13,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,532 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table262) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,532 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table263
2023-07-17 21:53:13,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,533 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table263) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,533 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table264
2023-07-17 21:53:13,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,533 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table264) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,533 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table265
2023-07-17 21:53:13,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,533 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table265) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,533 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table266
2023-07-17 21:53:13,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,534 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table266) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,534 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table267
2023-07-17 21:53:13,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,534 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table267) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,534 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table268
2023-07-17 21:53:13,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,535 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table268) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,535 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table269
2023-07-17 21:53:13,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,535 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table269) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,535 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table270
2023-07-17 21:53:13,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,536 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table270) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,536 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table271
2023-07-17 21:53:13,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,536 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table271) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,536 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table272
2023-07-17 21:53:13,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,537 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table272) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,537 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table251
2023-07-17 21:53:13,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,537 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table251) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,537 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table493
2023-07-17 21:53:13,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,537 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table493) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,538 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table252
2023-07-17 21:53:13,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,538 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table252) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,538 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table494
2023-07-17 21:53:13,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,538 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table494) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,538 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table253
2023-07-17 21:53:13,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,539 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table253) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,539 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table495
2023-07-17 21:53:13,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,539 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table495) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,540 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table254
2023-07-17 21:53:13,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,540 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table254) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,540 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table496
2023-07-17 21:53:13,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,541 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table496) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,541 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table255
2023-07-17 21:53:13,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,541 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table255) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,541 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table497
2023-07-17 21:53:13,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,542 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table497) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,542 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table256
2023-07-17 21:53:13,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,543 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table256) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,543 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table498
2023-07-17 21:53:13,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,543 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table498) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,543 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table257
2023-07-17 21:53:13,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,544 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table257) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,544 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table499
2023-07-17 21:53:13,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,544 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table499) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,544 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table258
2023-07-17 21:53:13,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,544 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table258) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,544 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table259
2023-07-17 21:53:13,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,545 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table259) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,545 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table260
2023-07-17 21:53:13,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,545 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table260) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,545 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table261
2023-07-17 21:53:13,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,546 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table261) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,546 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table680
2023-07-17 21:53:13,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,546 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table680) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,546 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table681
2023-07-17 21:53:13,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,547 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table681) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,547 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table440
2023-07-17 21:53:13,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,547 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table440) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,547 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table682
2023-07-17 21:53:13,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,548 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table682) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,548 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table441
2023-07-17 21:53:13,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,548 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table441) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,548 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table683
2023-07-17 21:53:13,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,548 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table683) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,548 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table200
2023-07-17 21:53:13,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,549 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table200) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,549 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table442
2023-07-17 21:53:13,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,549 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table442) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,549 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table684
2023-07-17 21:53:13,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,550 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table684) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,550 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1340
2023-07-17 21:53:13,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,550 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1340) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,550 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table201
2023-07-17 21:53:13,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,551 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table201) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,551 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table443
2023-07-17 21:53:13,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,552 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table443) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,552 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table685
2023-07-17 21:53:13,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,552 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table685) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,552 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1341
2023-07-17 21:53:13,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,552 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1341) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,552 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table202
2023-07-17 21:53:13,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,553 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table202) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,553 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table444
2023-07-17 21:53:13,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,553 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table444) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,553 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table686
2023-07-17 21:53:13,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,554 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table686) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,554 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1100
2023-07-17 21:53:13,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,554 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1100) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,554 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1342
2023-07-17 21:53:13,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,555 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1342) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,555 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table203
2023-07-17 21:53:13,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,555 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table203) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,555 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table445
2023-07-17 21:53:13,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,556 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table445) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,556 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table687
2023-07-17 21:53:13,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,556 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table687) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,556 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1101
2023-07-17 21:53:13,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,557 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1101) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,557 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1343
2023-07-17 21:53:13,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,557 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1343) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,557 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table204
2023-07-17 21:53:13,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,558 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table204) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,558 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table446
2023-07-17 21:53:13,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,558 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table446) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,558 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table688
2023-07-17 21:53:13,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,558 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table688) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,558 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table205
2023-07-17 21:53:13,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,559 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table205) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,559 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table447
2023-07-17 21:53:13,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,559 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table447) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,559 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table689
2023-07-17 21:53:13,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,560 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table689) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,560 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table206
2023-07-17 21:53:13,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,560 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table206) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,560 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table448
2023-07-17 21:53:13,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,561 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table448) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,561 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table207
2023-07-17 21:53:13,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,562 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table207) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,562 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table449
2023-07-17 21:53:13,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,562 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table449) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,562 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table208
2023-07-17 21:53:13,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,563 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table208) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,563 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table209
2023-07-17 21:53:13,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,564 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table209) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,564 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1102
2023-07-17 21:53:13,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,564 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1102) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,564 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1344
2023-07-17 21:53:13,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,564 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1344) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,564 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1103
2023-07-17 21:53:13,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,565 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1103) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,565 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1345
2023-07-17 21:53:13,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,565 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1345) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,565 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1104
2023-07-17 21:53:13,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,566 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1104) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,566 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1346
2023-07-17 21:53:13,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,566 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1346) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,566 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1105
2023-07-17 21:53:13,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,567 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1105) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,567 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1347
2023-07-17 21:53:13,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,567 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1347) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,567 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1106
2023-07-17 21:53:13,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,567 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1106) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,568 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1348
2023-07-17 21:53:13,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,568 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1348) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,568 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1107
2023-07-17 21:53:13,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,568 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1107) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,568 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1349
2023-07-17 21:53:13,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,569 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1349) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,569 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1108
2023-07-17 21:53:13,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,569 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1108) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,569 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table690
2023-07-17 21:53:13,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,570 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table690) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,570 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1109
2023-07-17 21:53:13,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,570 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1109) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,570 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table670
2023-07-17 21:53:13,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,571 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table670) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,571 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table671
2023-07-17 21:53:13,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,571 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table671) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,571 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table430
2023-07-17 21:53:13,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,571 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table430) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,572 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table672
2023-07-17 21:53:13,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,572 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table672) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,572 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table431
2023-07-17 21:53:13,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,573 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table431) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,573 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table673
2023-07-17 21:53:13,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,573 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table673) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,573 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table432
2023-07-17 21:53:13,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,574 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table432) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,574 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table674
2023-07-17 21:53:13,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,574 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table674) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,574 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1330
2023-07-17 21:53:13,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,575 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1330) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,575 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table433
2023-07-17 21:53:13,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,575 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table433) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,575 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table675
2023-07-17 21:53:13,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,575 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table675) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,575 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1331
2023-07-17 21:53:13,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,576 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1331) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,576 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table434
2023-07-17 21:53:13,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,576 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table434) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,576 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table676
2023-07-17 21:53:13,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,577 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table676) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,577 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1332
2023-07-17 21:53:13,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,577 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1332) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,577 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table435
2023-07-17 21:53:13,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,578 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table435) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,578 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table677
2023-07-17 21:53:13,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,579 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table677) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,579 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table436
2023-07-17 21:53:13,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,579 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table436) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,579 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table678
2023-07-17 21:53:13,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,579 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table678) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,580 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table437
2023-07-17 21:53:13,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,580 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table437) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,580 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table679
2023-07-17 21:53:13,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,580 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table679) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,580 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table438
2023-07-17 21:53:13,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,581 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table438) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,581 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table439
2023-07-17 21:53:13,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,581 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table439) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,581 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1333
2023-07-17 21:53:13,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,582 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1333) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,582 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1334
2023-07-17 21:53:13,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,583 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1334) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,583 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1335
2023-07-17 21:53:13,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,584 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1335) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,584 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1336
2023-07-17 21:53:13,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,584 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1336) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,584 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1337
2023-07-17 21:53:13,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,584 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1337) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,585 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1338
2023-07-17 21:53:13,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,585 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1338) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,585 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1339
2023-07-17 21:53:13,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,585 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1339) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,585 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table460
2023-07-17 21:53:13,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,586 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table460) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,586 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table461
2023-07-17 21:53:13,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,586 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table461) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,586 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table220
2023-07-17 21:53:13,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,587 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table220) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,587 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table462
2023-07-17 21:53:13,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,587 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table462) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,587 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table221
2023-07-17 21:53:13,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,588 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table221) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,588 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table463
2023-07-17 21:53:13,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,588 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table463) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,588 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table222
2023-07-17 21:53:13,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,588 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table222) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,589 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table464
2023-07-17 21:53:13,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,589 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table464) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,589 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table223
2023-07-17 21:53:13,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,589 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table223) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,589 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table465
2023-07-17 21:53:13,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,590 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table465) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,590 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table224
2023-07-17 21:53:13,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,590 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table224) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,590 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table466
2023-07-17 21:53:13,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,591 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table466) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,591 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1320
2023-07-17 21:53:13,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,591 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1320) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,591 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table225
2023-07-17 21:53:13,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,592 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table225) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,592 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table467
2023-07-17 21:53:13,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,592 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table467) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,592 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1321
2023-07-17 21:53:13,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,593 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1321) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,593 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table226
2023-07-17 21:53:13,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,593 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table226) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,593 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table468
2023-07-17 21:53:13,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,594 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table468) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,594 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table227
2023-07-17 21:53:13,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,594 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table227) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,595 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table469
2023-07-17 21:53:13,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,595 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table469) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,595 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table228
2023-07-17 21:53:13,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,595 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table228) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,595 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table229
2023-07-17 21:53:13,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,596 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table229) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,596 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1322
2023-07-17 21:53:13,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,596 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1322) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,596 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1323
2023-07-17 21:53:13,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,597 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1323) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,597 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1324
2023-07-17 21:53:13,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,597 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1324) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,597 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1325
2023-07-17 21:53:13,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,598 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1325) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,598 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1326
2023-07-17 21:53:13,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,598 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1326) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,598 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1327
2023-07-17 21:53:13,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,598 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1327) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,598 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1328
2023-07-17 21:53:13,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,599 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1328) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,599 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table470
2023-07-17 21:53:13,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,599 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table470) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,599 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1329
2023-07-17 21:53:13,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,600 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1329) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,600 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table691
2023-07-17 21:53:13,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,600 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table691) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,600 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table450
2023-07-17 21:53:13,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,601 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table450) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,601 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table692
2023-07-17 21:53:13,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,601 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table692) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,601 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table451
2023-07-17 21:53:13,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,602 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table451) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,602 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table693
2023-07-17 21:53:13,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,603 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table693) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,603 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table210
2023-07-17 21:53:13,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,604 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table210) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,604 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table452
2023-07-17 21:53:13,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,604 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table452) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,604 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table694
2023-07-17 21:53:13,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,605 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table694) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,605 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table211
2023-07-17 21:53:13,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,606 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table211) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,606 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table453
2023-07-17 21:53:13,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,607 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table453) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,607 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table695
2023-07-17 21:53:13,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,608 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table695) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,608 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table212
2023-07-17 21:53:13,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,608 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table212) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,609 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table454
2023-07-17 21:53:13,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,609 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table454) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,609 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table696
2023-07-17 21:53:13,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,610 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table696) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,610 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table213
2023-07-17 21:53:13,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,611 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table213) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,611 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table455
2023-07-17 21:53:13,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,612 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table455) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,612 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table697
2023-07-17 21:53:13,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,612 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table697) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,612 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table214
2023-07-17 21:53:13,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,613 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table214) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,613 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table456
2023-07-17 21:53:13,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,614 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table456) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,614 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table698
2023-07-17 21:53:13,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,614 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table698) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,614 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1310
2023-07-17 21:53:13,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,615 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1310) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,615 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table215
2023-07-17 21:53:13,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,615 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table215) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,615 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table457
2023-07-17 21:53:13,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,616 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table457) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,616 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table699
2023-07-17 21:53:13,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,616 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table699) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,616 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table216
2023-07-17 21:53:13,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,617 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table216) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,617 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table458
2023-07-17 21:53:13,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,617 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table458) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,617 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table217
2023-07-17 21:53:13,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,617 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table217) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,618 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table459
2023-07-17 21:53:13,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,618 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table459) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,618 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table218
2023-07-17 21:53:13,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,618 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table218) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,618 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table219
2023-07-17 21:53:13,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,619 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table219) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,619 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1319
2023-07-17 21:53:13,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,619 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1319) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,620 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1311
2023-07-17 21:53:13,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,620 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1311) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,620 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1312
2023-07-17 21:53:13,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,620 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1312) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,620 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1313
2023-07-17 21:53:13,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,621 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1313) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,621 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1314
2023-07-17 21:53:13,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,621 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1314) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,621 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1315
2023-07-17 21:53:13,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,622 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1315) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,622 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1316
2023-07-17 21:53:13,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,622 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1316) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,622 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1317
2023-07-17 21:53:13,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,623 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1317) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,623 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1318
2023-07-17 21:53:13,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,623 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1318) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,623 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table196
2023-07-17 21:53:13,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,623 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table196) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,623 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table197
2023-07-17 21:53:13,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,624 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table197) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,624 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table198
2023-07-17 21:53:13,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,624 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table198) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,624 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table199
2023-07-17 21:53:13,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,625 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table199) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,625 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table163
2023-07-17 21:53:13,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,625 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table163) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,625 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table164
2023-07-17 21:53:13,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,626 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table164) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,626 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table165
2023-07-17 21:53:13,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,626 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table165) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,626 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table166
2023-07-17 21:53:13,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,627 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table166) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,627 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table167
2023-07-17 21:53:13,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,627 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table167) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,627 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table168
2023-07-17 21:53:13,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,628 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table168) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,628 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table169
2023-07-17 21:53:13,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,628 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table169) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,628 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table170
2023-07-17 21:53:13,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,628 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table170) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,628 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table171
2023-07-17 21:53:13,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,629 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table171) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,629 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table172
2023-07-17 21:53:13,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,630 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table172) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,630 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table173
2023-07-17 21:53:13,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,630 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table173) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,630 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table152
2023-07-17 21:53:13,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,631 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table152) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,631 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table394
2023-07-17 21:53:13,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,631 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table394) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,631 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table153
2023-07-17 21:53:13,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,631 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table153) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,631 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table395
2023-07-17 21:53:13,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,632 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table395) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,632 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table154
2023-07-17 21:53:13,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,632 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table154) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,632 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table396
2023-07-17 21:53:13,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,633 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table396) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,633 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table155
2023-07-17 21:53:13,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,633 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table155) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,633 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table397
2023-07-17 21:53:13,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,634 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table397) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,634 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table156
2023-07-17 21:53:13,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,634 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table156) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,634 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table398
2023-07-17 21:53:13,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,635 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table398) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,635 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table157
2023-07-17 21:53:13,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,635 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table157) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,635 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table399
2023-07-17 21:53:13,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,635 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table399) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,636 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table158
2023-07-17 21:53:13,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,636 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table158) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,636 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table159
2023-07-17 21:53:13,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,636 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table159) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,636 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table160
2023-07-17 21:53:13,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,637 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table160) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,637 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table161
2023-07-17 21:53:13,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,637 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table161) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,637 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table162
2023-07-17 21:53:13,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,638 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table162) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,638 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table185
2023-07-17 21:53:13,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,638 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table185) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,638 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table186
2023-07-17 21:53:13,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,639 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table186) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,639 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table187
2023-07-17 21:53:13,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,639 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table187) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,639 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table188
2023-07-17 21:53:13,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,640 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table188) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,640 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table189
2023-07-17 21:53:13,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,640 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table189) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,640 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table190
2023-07-17 21:53:13,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,641 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table190) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,641 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table191
2023-07-17 21:53:13,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,641 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table191) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,641 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table192
2023-07-17 21:53:13,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,642 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table192) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,642 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table193
2023-07-17 21:53:13,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,642 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table193) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,642 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table194
2023-07-17 21:53:13,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,643 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table194) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,643 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table195
2023-07-17 21:53:13,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,643 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table195) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,643 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table174
2023-07-17 21:53:13,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,644 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table174) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,644 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table175
2023-07-17 21:53:13,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,644 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table175) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,644 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table176
2023-07-17 21:53:13,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,644 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table176) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,645 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table177
2023-07-17 21:53:13,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,645 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table177) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,645 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table178
2023-07-17 21:53:13,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,645 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table178) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,645 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table179
2023-07-17 21:53:13,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,646 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table179) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,646 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table180
2023-07-17 21:53:13,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,646 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table180) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,646 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table181
2023-07-17 21:53:13,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,647 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table181) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,647 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table182
2023-07-17 21:53:13,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,647 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table182) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,647 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table183
2023-07-17 21:53:13,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,648 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table183) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,648 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table184
2023-07-17 21:53:13,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,648 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table184) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,648 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table800
2023-07-17 21:53:13,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,649 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table800) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,649 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table801
2023-07-17 21:53:13,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,649 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table801) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,649 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table802
2023-07-17 21:53:13,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,649 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table802) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,650 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table803
2023-07-17 21:53:13,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,650 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table803) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,650 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table804
2023-07-17 21:53:13,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,651 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table804) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,651 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table805
2023-07-17 21:53:13,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,651 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table805) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,651 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table806
2023-07-17 21:53:13,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,652 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table806) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,652 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table807
2023-07-17 21:53:13,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,652 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table807) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,652 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table808
2023-07-17 21:53:13,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,652 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table808) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,653 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table809
2023-07-17 21:53:13,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,653 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table809) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,653 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table820
2023-07-17 21:53:13,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,653 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table820) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,653 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table821
2023-07-17 21:53:13,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,654 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table821) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,654 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table822
2023-07-17 21:53:13,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,654 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table822) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,654 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table823
2023-07-17 21:53:13,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,655 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table823) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,655 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table824
2023-07-17 21:53:13,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,655 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table824) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,655 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table825
2023-07-17 21:53:13,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,656 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table825) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,656 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table826
2023-07-17 21:53:13,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,656 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table826) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,656 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table827
2023-07-17 21:53:13,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,656 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table827) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,656 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table828
2023-07-17 21:53:13,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,657 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table828) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,657 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table829
2023-07-17 21:53:13,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,657 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table829) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,657 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1193
2023-07-17 21:53:13,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,658 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1193) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,658 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1194
2023-07-17 21:53:13,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,658 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1194) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,658 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1195
2023-07-17 21:53:13,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,659 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1195) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,659 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1196
2023-07-17 21:53:13,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,659 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1196) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,659 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1197
2023-07-17 21:53:13,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,660 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1197) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,660 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1198
2023-07-17 21:53:13,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,660 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1198) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,660 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1199
2023-07-17 21:53:13,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,661 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1199) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,661 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table810
2023-07-17 21:53:13,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,661 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table810) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,661 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table811
2023-07-17 21:53:13,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,662 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table811) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,662 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table812
2023-07-17 21:53:13,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,662 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table812) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,662 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table813
2023-07-17 21:53:13,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,663 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table813) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,663 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table814
2023-07-17 21:53:13,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,663 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table814) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,663 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1190
2023-07-17 21:53:13,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,663 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1190) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,663 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table815
2023-07-17 21:53:13,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,664 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table815) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,664 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1191
2023-07-17 21:53:13,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,664 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1191) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,664 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table816
2023-07-17 21:53:13,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,665 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table816) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,665 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1192
2023-07-17 21:53:13,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,665 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1192) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,665 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table817
2023-07-17 21:53:13,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,666 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table817) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,666 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table818
2023-07-17 21:53:13,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,666 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table818) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,666 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table819
2023-07-17 21:53:13,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,666 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table819) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,666 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1260
2023-07-17 21:53:13,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,667 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1260) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,667 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1261
2023-07-17 21:53:13,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,667 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1261) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,667 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table760
2023-07-17 21:53:13,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,668 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table760) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,668 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1020
2023-07-17 21:53:13,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,668 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1020) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,668 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1262
2023-07-17 21:53:13,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,669 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1262) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,669 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table761
2023-07-17 21:53:13,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,669 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table761) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,669 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1021
2023-07-17 21:53:13,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,669 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1021) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,670 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1263
2023-07-17 21:53:13,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,670 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1263) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,670 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table520
2023-07-17 21:53:13,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,671 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table520) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,671 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table762
2023-07-17 21:53:13,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,671 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table762) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,671 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1022
2023-07-17 21:53:13,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,672 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1022) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,672 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1264
2023-07-17 21:53:13,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,672 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1264) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,672 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table521
2023-07-17 21:53:13,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,672 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table521) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,673 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table763
2023-07-17 21:53:13,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,673 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table763) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,673 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1023
2023-07-17 21:53:13,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,673 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1023) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,673 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1265
2023-07-17 21:53:13,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,674 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1265) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,674 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table522
2023-07-17 21:53:13,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,674 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table522) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,674 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table764
2023-07-17 21:53:13,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,675 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table764) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,675 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1024
2023-07-17 21:53:13,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,675 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1024) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,675 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1266
2023-07-17 21:53:13,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,676 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1266) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,676 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table523
2023-07-17 21:53:13,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,676 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table523) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,676 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table765
2023-07-17 21:53:13,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,676 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table765) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,676 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table524
2023-07-17 21:53:13,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,677 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table524) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,677 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table766
2023-07-17 21:53:13,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,677 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table766) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,677 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table525
2023-07-17 21:53:13,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,678 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table525) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,678 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table767
2023-07-17 21:53:13,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,678 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table767) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,678 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table526
2023-07-17 21:53:13,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,679 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table526) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,679 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table768
2023-07-17 21:53:13,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,679 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table768) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,679 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table527
2023-07-17 21:53:13,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,679 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table527) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,680 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table769
2023-07-17 21:53:13,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,680 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table769) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,680 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table528
2023-07-17 21:53:13,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,681 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table528) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,681 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table529
2023-07-17 21:53:13,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,681 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table529) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,681 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table90
2023-07-17 21:53:13,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,682 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table90) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,682 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table91
2023-07-17 21:53:13,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,682 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table91) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,682 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table92
2023-07-17 21:53:13,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,683 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table92) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,683 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table93
2023-07-17 21:53:13,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,683 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table93) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,683 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1025
2023-07-17 21:53:13,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,683 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1025) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,684 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1267
2023-07-17 21:53:13,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,684 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1267) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,684 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table94
2023-07-17 21:53:13,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,684 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table94) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,684 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1026
2023-07-17 21:53:13,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,685 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1026) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,685 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1268
2023-07-17 21:53:13,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,685 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1268) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,685 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table95
2023-07-17 21:53:13,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,686 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table95) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,686 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1027
2023-07-17 21:53:13,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,686 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1027) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,686 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1269
2023-07-17 21:53:13,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,687 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1269) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,687 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table96
2023-07-17 21:53:13,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,687 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table96) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,687 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1028
2023-07-17 21:53:13,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,687 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1028) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,687 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table97
2023-07-17 21:53:13,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,688 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table97) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,688 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1029
2023-07-17 21:53:13,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,688 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1029) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,688 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table98
2023-07-17 21:53:13,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,689 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table98) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,689 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table99
2023-07-17 21:53:13,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,689 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table99) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,689 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1490
2023-07-17 21:53:13,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,690 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1490) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,690 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1491
2023-07-17 21:53:13,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,690 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1491) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,691 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table990
2023-07-17 21:53:13,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,691 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table990) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,691 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1250
2023-07-17 21:53:13,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,691 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1250) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,691 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1492
2023-07-17 21:53:13,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,692 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1492) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,692 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table991
2023-07-17 21:53:13,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,692 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table991) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,692 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1251
2023-07-17 21:53:13,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,693 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1251) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,693 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1493
2023-07-17 21:53:13,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,693 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1493) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,693 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table750
2023-07-17 21:53:13,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,693 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table750) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,694 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table992
2023-07-17 21:53:13,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,694 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table992) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,694 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1010
2023-07-17 21:53:13,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,694 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1010) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,694 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1252
2023-07-17 21:53:13,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,695 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1252) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,695 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1494
2023-07-17 21:53:13,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,695 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1494) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,695 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table751
2023-07-17 21:53:13,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,696 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table751) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,696 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table993
2023-07-17 21:53:13,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,696 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table993) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,696 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1011
2023-07-17 21:53:13,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,697 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1011) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,697 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1253
2023-07-17 21:53:13,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,697 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1253) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,697 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1495
2023-07-17 21:53:13,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,697 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1495) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,697 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table510
2023-07-17 21:53:13,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,698 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table510) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,698 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table752
2023-07-17 21:53:13,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,698 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table752) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,698 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table994
2023-07-17 21:53:13,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,699 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table994) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,699 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1012
2023-07-17 21:53:13,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,699 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1012) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,699 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1254
2023-07-17 21:53:13,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,700 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1254) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,700 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1496
2023-07-17 21:53:13,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,700 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1496) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,700 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table511
2023-07-17 21:53:13,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,701 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table511) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,701 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table753
2023-07-17 21:53:13,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,701 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table753) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,701 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table995
2023-07-17 21:53:13,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,702 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table995) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,702 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1013
2023-07-17 21:53:13,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,702 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1013) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,702 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1255
2023-07-17 21:53:13,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,703 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1255) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,703 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1497
2023-07-17 21:53:13,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,703 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1497) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,703 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table512
2023-07-17 21:53:13,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,703 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table512) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,703 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table754
2023-07-17 21:53:13,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,704 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table754) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,704 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table996
2023-07-17 21:53:13,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,704 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table996) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,704 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table513
2023-07-17 21:53:13,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,705 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table513) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,705 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table755
2023-07-17 21:53:13,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,705 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table755) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,705 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table997
2023-07-17 21:53:13,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,706 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table997) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,706 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table514
2023-07-17 21:53:13,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,706 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table514) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,706 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table756
2023-07-17 21:53:13,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,706 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table756) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,706 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table998
2023-07-17 21:53:13,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,707 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table998) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,707 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table515
2023-07-17 21:53:13,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,707 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table515) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,707 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table757
2023-07-17 21:53:13,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,708 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table757) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,708 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table999
2023-07-17 21:53:13,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,708 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table999) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,708 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table516
2023-07-17 21:53:13,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,709 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table516) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,709 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table758
2023-07-17 21:53:13,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,709 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table758) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,709 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table517
2023-07-17 21:53:13,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,709 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table517) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,710 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table759
2023-07-17 21:53:13,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,710 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table759) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,710 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table518
2023-07-17 21:53:13,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,711 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table518) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,711 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table519
2023-07-17 21:53:13,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,711 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table519) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,711 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table80
2023-07-17 21:53:13,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,712 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table80) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,712 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table81
2023-07-17 21:53:13,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,712 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table81) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,712 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table82
2023-07-17 21:53:13,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,713 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table82) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,713 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1014
2023-07-17 21:53:13,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,713 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1014) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,713 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1256
2023-07-17 21:53:13,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,713 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1256) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,713 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1498
2023-07-17 21:53:13,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,714 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1498) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,714 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table83
2023-07-17 21:53:13,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,714 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table83) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,714 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1015
2023-07-17 21:53:13,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,715 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1015) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,715 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1257
2023-07-17 21:53:13,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,715 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1257) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,715 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1499
2023-07-17 21:53:13,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,716 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1499) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,716 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table84
2023-07-17 21:53:13,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,716 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table84) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,716 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1016
2023-07-17 21:53:13,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,716 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1016) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,717 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1258
2023-07-17 21:53:13,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,717 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1258) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,717 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table85
2023-07-17 21:53:13,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,717 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table85) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,717 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1017
2023-07-17 21:53:13,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,718 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1017) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,718 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1259
2023-07-17 21:53:13,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,718 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1259) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,718 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table86
2023-07-17 21:53:13,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,719 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table86) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,719 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1018
2023-07-17 21:53:13,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,719 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1018) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,719 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table87
2023-07-17 21:53:13,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,720 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table87) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,720 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1019
2023-07-17 21:53:13,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,720 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1019) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,720 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table88
2023-07-17 21:53:13,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,721 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table88) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,721 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table89
2023-07-17 21:53:13,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,721 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table89) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,721 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table79
2023-07-17 21:53:13,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,722 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table79) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,722 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table780
2023-07-17 21:53:13,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,722 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table780) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,722 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1480
2023-07-17 21:53:13,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,723 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1480) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,723 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table781
2023-07-17 21:53:13,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,723 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table781) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,723 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1481
2023-07-17 21:53:13,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,723 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1481) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,724 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table540
2023-07-17 21:53:13,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,724 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table540) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,724 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table782
2023-07-17 21:53:13,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,724 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table782) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,724 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1240
2023-07-17 21:53:13,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,725 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1240) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,725 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1482
2023-07-17 21:53:13,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,725 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1482) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,725 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table541
2023-07-17 21:53:13,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,726 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table541) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,726 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table783
2023-07-17 21:53:13,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,726 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table783) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,726 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1241
2023-07-17 21:53:13,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,727 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1241) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,727 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1483
2023-07-17 21:53:13,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,727 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1483) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,727 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table300
2023-07-17 21:53:13,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,727 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table300) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,727 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table542
2023-07-17 21:53:13,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,728 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table542) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,728 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table784
2023-07-17 21:53:13,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,728 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table784) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,728 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1000
2023-07-17 21:53:13,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,729 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1000) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,729 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1242
2023-07-17 21:53:13,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,729 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1242) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,729 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1484
2023-07-17 21:53:13,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,730 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1484) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,730 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table301
2023-07-17 21:53:13,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,730 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table301) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,730 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table543
2023-07-17 21:53:13,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,731 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table543) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,731 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table785
2023-07-17 21:53:13,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,731 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table785) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,731 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1001
2023-07-17 21:53:13,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,732 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1001) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,732 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1243
2023-07-17 21:53:13,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,732 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1243) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,732 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1485
2023-07-17 21:53:13,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,733 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1485) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,733 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table302
2023-07-17 21:53:13,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,733 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table302) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,733 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table544
2023-07-17 21:53:13,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,733 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table544) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,734 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table786
2023-07-17 21:53:13,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,734 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table786) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,734 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1002
2023-07-17 21:53:13,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,734 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1002) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,734 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1244
2023-07-17 21:53:13,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,735 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1244) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,735 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1486
2023-07-17 21:53:13,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,735 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1486) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,735 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table303
2023-07-17 21:53:13,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,736 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table303) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,736 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table545
2023-07-17 21:53:13,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,736 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table545) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,736 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table787
2023-07-17 21:53:13,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,736 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table787) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,737 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table304
2023-07-17 21:53:13,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,737 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table304) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,737 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table546
2023-07-17 21:53:13,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,737 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table546) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,737 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table788
2023-07-17 21:53:13,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,738 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table788) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,738 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table305
2023-07-17 21:53:13,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,738 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table305) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,738 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table547
2023-07-17 21:53:13,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,739 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table547) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,739 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table789
2023-07-17 21:53:13,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,739 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table789) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,739 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table306
2023-07-17 21:53:13,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,740 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table306) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,740 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table548
2023-07-17 21:53:13,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,740 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table548) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,740 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table307
2023-07-17 21:53:13,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,741 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table307) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,741 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table549
2023-07-17 21:53:13,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,741 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table549) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,741 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table308
2023-07-17 21:53:13,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,742 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table308) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,742 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table309
2023-07-17 21:53:13,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,742 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table309) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,742 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table70
2023-07-17 21:53:13,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,743 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table70) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,743 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table71
2023-07-17 21:53:13,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,743 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table71) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,743 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1003
2023-07-17 21:53:13,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,744 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1003) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,744 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1245
2023-07-17 21:53:13,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,744 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1245) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,744 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1487
2023-07-17 21:53:13,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,744 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1487) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,744 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table72
2023-07-17 21:53:13,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,745 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table72) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,745 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1004
2023-07-17 21:53:13,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,746 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1004) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,746 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1246
2023-07-17 21:53:13,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,746 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1246) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,746 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1488
2023-07-17 21:53:13,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,747 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1488) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,747 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table73
2023-07-17 21:53:13,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,748 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table73) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,748 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1005
2023-07-17 21:53:13,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,749 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1005) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,749 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1247
2023-07-17 21:53:13,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,749 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1247) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,750 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1489
2023-07-17 21:53:13,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,750 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1489) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,750 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table74
2023-07-17 21:53:13,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,751 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table74) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,751 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1006
2023-07-17 21:53:13,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,752 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1006) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,752 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1248
2023-07-17 21:53:13,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,753 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1248) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,753 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table75
2023-07-17 21:53:13,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,753 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table75) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,754 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1007
2023-07-17 21:53:13,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,754 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1007) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,754 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1249
2023-07-17 21:53:13,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,755 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1249) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,755 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table76
2023-07-17 21:53:13,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,756 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table76) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,756 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1008
2023-07-17 21:53:13,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,757 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1008) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,757 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table77
2023-07-17 21:53:13,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,757 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table77) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,757 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1009
2023-07-17 21:53:13,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,758 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1009) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,758 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table78
2023-07-17 21:53:13,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,759 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table78) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,759 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table68
2023-07-17 21:53:13,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,760 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table68) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,760 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table69
2023-07-17 21:53:13,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,760 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table69) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,761 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table770
2023-07-17 21:53:13,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,761 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table770) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,761 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1470
2023-07-17 21:53:13,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,762 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1470) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,762 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table771
2023-07-17 21:53:13,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,763 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table771) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,763 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1471
2023-07-17 21:53:13,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,763 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1471) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,764 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table530
2023-07-17 21:53:13,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,764 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table530) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,764 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table772
2023-07-17 21:53:13,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,765 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table772) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,765 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1230
2023-07-17 21:53:13,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,765 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1230) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,765 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1472
2023-07-17 21:53:13,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,765 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1472) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,766 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table531
2023-07-17 21:53:13,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,766 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table531) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,766 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table773
2023-07-17 21:53:13,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,766 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table773) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,766 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1231
2023-07-17 21:53:13,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,767 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1231) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,767 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1473
2023-07-17 21:53:13,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,767 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1473) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,767 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table532
2023-07-17 21:53:13,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,768 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table532) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,768 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table774
2023-07-17 21:53:13,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,768 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table774) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,768 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1232
2023-07-17 21:53:13,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,769 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1232) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,769 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1474
2023-07-17 21:53:13,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,769 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1474) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,769 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table533
2023-07-17 21:53:13,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,770 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table533) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,770 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table775
2023-07-17 21:53:13,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,770 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table775) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,770 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1233
2023-07-17 21:53:13,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,771 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1233) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,771 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1475
2023-07-17 21:53:13,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,771 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1475) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,771 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table534
2023-07-17 21:53:13,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,771 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table534) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,771 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table776
2023-07-17 21:53:13,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,772 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table776) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,772 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table535
2023-07-17 21:53:13,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,772 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table535) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,772 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table777
2023-07-17 21:53:13,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,773 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table777) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,773 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table536
2023-07-17 21:53:13,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,773 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table536) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,773 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table778
2023-07-17 21:53:13,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,774 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table778) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,774 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table537
2023-07-17 21:53:13,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,774 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table537) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,774 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table779
2023-07-17 21:53:13,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,774 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table779) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,774 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table538
2023-07-17 21:53:13,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,775 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table538) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,775 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table539
2023-07-17 21:53:13,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,775 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table539) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,775 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table60
2023-07-17 21:53:13,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,776 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table60) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,776 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1234
2023-07-17 21:53:13,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,776 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1234) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,776 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1476
2023-07-17 21:53:13,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,777 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1476) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,777 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table61
2023-07-17 21:53:13,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,777 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table61) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,777 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1235
2023-07-17 21:53:13,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,778 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1235) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,778 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1477
2023-07-17 21:53:13,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,778 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1477) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,778 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table62
2023-07-17 21:53:13,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,779 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table62) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,779 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1236
2023-07-17 21:53:13,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,779 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1236) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,779 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1478
2023-07-17 21:53:13,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,780 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1478) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,780 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table63
2023-07-17 21:53:13,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,780 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table63) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,780 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1237
2023-07-17 21:53:13,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,781 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1237) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,781 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1479
2023-07-17 21:53:13,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,781 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1479) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,781 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table64
2023-07-17 21:53:13,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,781 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table64) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,781 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1238
2023-07-17 21:53:13,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,782 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1238) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,782 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table65
2023-07-17 21:53:13,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,782 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table65) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,782 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1239
2023-07-17 21:53:13,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,790 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1239) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,790 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table66
2023-07-17 21:53:13,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,791 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table66) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,791 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table67
2023-07-17 21:53:13,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,792 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table67) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,792 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1061
2023-07-17 21:53:13,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,792 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1061) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,792 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1062
2023-07-17 21:53:13,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,793 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1062) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,793 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1063
2023-07-17 21:53:13,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,794 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1063) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,794 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1064
2023-07-17 21:53:13,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,794 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1064) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,794 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1065
2023-07-17 21:53:13,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,795 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1065) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,795 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table960
2023-07-17 21:53:13,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,795 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table960) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,796 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1066
2023-07-17 21:53:13,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,796 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1066) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,796 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table961
2023-07-17 21:53:13,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,797 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table961) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,797 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1067
2023-07-17 21:53:13,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,797 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1067) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,798 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table720
2023-07-17 21:53:13,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,798 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table720) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,798 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table962
2023-07-17 21:53:13,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,799 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table962) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,799 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1068
2023-07-17 21:53:13,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,800 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1068) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,800 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table721
2023-07-17 21:53:13,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,800 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table721) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,800 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table963
2023-07-17 21:53:13,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,801 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table963) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,801 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table722
2023-07-17 21:53:13,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,801 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table722) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,802 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table964
2023-07-17 21:53:13,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,802 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table964) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,802 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table723
2023-07-17 21:53:13,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,803 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table723) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,803 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table965
2023-07-17 21:53:13,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,803 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table965) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,803 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table724
2023-07-17 21:53:13,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,804 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table724) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,804 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table966
2023-07-17 21:53:13,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,805 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table966) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,805 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table725
2023-07-17 21:53:13,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,805 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table725) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,805 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table967
2023-07-17 21:53:13,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,806 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table967) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,806 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table726
2023-07-17 21:53:13,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,807 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table726) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,807 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table968
2023-07-17 21:53:13,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,807 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table968) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,807 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table727
2023-07-17 21:53:13,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,807 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table727) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,807 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table969
2023-07-17 21:53:13,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,808 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table969) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,808 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table728
2023-07-17 21:53:13,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,808 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table728) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,808 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1060
2023-07-17 21:53:13,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,809 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1060) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,809 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table729
2023-07-17 21:53:13,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,809 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table729) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,809 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1069
2023-07-17 21:53:13,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,809 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1069) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,809 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1050
2023-07-17 21:53:13,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,810 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1050) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,810 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1292
2023-07-17 21:53:13,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,810 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1292) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,810 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1051
2023-07-17 21:53:13,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,811 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1051) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,811 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1293
2023-07-17 21:53:13,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,811 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1293) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,811 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1052
2023-07-17 21:53:13,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,812 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1052) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,812 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1294
2023-07-17 21:53:13,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,812 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1294) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,812 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1053
2023-07-17 21:53:13,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,812 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1053) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,812 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1295
2023-07-17 21:53:13,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,813 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1295) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,813 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1054
2023-07-17 21:53:13,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,813 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1054) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,813 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1296
2023-07-17 21:53:13,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,813 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1296) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,814 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1055
2023-07-17 21:53:13,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,814 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1055) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,814 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1297
2023-07-17 21:53:13,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,814 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1297) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,814 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table950
2023-07-17 21:53:13,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,815 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table950) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,815 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1056
2023-07-17 21:53:13,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,815 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1056) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,815 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1298
2023-07-17 21:53:13,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,815 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1298) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,815 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table951
2023-07-17 21:53:13,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,816 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table951) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,816 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1057
2023-07-17 21:53:13,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,816 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1057) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,816 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1299
2023-07-17 21:53:13,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,816 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1299) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,817 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table710
2023-07-17 21:53:13,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,817 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table710) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,817 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table952
2023-07-17 21:53:13,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,817 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table952) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,817 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table711
2023-07-17 21:53:13,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,818 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table711) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,818 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table953
2023-07-17 21:53:13,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,818 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table953) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,818 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table712
2023-07-17 21:53:13,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,818 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table712) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,819 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table954
2023-07-17 21:53:13,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,819 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table954) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,819 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table713
2023-07-17 21:53:13,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,820 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table713) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,820 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table955
2023-07-17 21:53:13,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,820 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table955) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,820 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table714
2023-07-17 21:53:13,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,820 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table714) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,820 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table956
2023-07-17 21:53:13,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,821 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table956) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,821 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table715
2023-07-17 21:53:13,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,821 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table715) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,821 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table957
2023-07-17 21:53:13,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,821 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table957) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,821 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table716
2023-07-17 21:53:13,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,822 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table716) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,822 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table958
2023-07-17 21:53:13,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,822 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table958) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,822 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1290
2023-07-17 21:53:13,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,823 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1290) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,823 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table717
2023-07-17 21:53:13,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,823 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table717) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,823 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table959
2023-07-17 21:53:13,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,823 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table959) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,823 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1291
2023-07-17 21:53:13,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,824 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1291) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,824 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table718
2023-07-17 21:53:13,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,824 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table718) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,824 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table719
2023-07-17 21:53:13,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,824 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table719) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,824 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1058
2023-07-17 21:53:13,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,825 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1058) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,825 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1059
2023-07-17 21:53:13,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,825 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1059) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,825 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1281
2023-07-17 21:53:13,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,825 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1281) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,826 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1040
2023-07-17 21:53:13,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,826 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1040) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,826 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1282
2023-07-17 21:53:13,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,826 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1282) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,826 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1041
2023-07-17 21:53:13,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,827 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1041) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,827 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1283
2023-07-17 21:53:13,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,827 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1283) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,827 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table980
2023-07-17 21:53:13,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,828 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table980) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,828 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1042
2023-07-17 21:53:13,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,828 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1042) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,828 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1284
2023-07-17 21:53:13,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,829 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1284) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,829 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table981
2023-07-17 21:53:13,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,829 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table981) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,829 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1043
2023-07-17 21:53:13,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,829 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1043) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,829 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1285
2023-07-17 21:53:13,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,830 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1285) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,830 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table740
2023-07-17 21:53:13,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,830 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table740) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,830 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table982
2023-07-17 21:53:13,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,830 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table982) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,830 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1044
2023-07-17 21:53:13,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,831 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1044) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,831 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1286
2023-07-17 21:53:13,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,831 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1286) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,831 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table741
2023-07-17 21:53:13,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,832 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table741) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,832 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table983
2023-07-17 21:53:13,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,832 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table983) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,832 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1045
2023-07-17 21:53:13,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,832 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1045) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,832 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1287
2023-07-17 21:53:13,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,833 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1287) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,833 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table500
2023-07-17 21:53:13,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,833 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table500) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,833 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table742
2023-07-17 21:53:13,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,833 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table742) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,833 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table984
2023-07-17 21:53:13,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,834 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table984) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,834 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1046
2023-07-17 21:53:13,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,834 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1046) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,834 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1288
2023-07-17 21:53:13,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,834 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1288) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,835 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table501
2023-07-17 21:53:13,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,835 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table501) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,835 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table743
2023-07-17 21:53:13,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,835 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table743) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,835 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table985
2023-07-17 21:53:13,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,836 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table985) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,836 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table502
2023-07-17 21:53:13,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,836 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table502) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,836 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table744
2023-07-17 21:53:13,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,837 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table744) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,837 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table986
2023-07-17 21:53:13,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,837 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table986) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,837 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table503
2023-07-17 21:53:13,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,837 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table503) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,838 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table745
2023-07-17 21:53:13,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,838 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table745) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,838 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table987
2023-07-17 21:53:13,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,838 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table987) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,838 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table504
2023-07-17 21:53:13,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,839 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table504) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,839 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table746
2023-07-17 21:53:13,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,839 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table746) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,839 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table988
2023-07-17 21:53:13,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,839 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table988) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,839 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table505
2023-07-17 21:53:13,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,840 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table505) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,840 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table747
2023-07-17 21:53:13,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,840 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table747) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,840 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table989
2023-07-17 21:53:13,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,840 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table989) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,841 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table506
2023-07-17 21:53:13,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,841 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table506) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,841 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table748
2023-07-17 21:53:13,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,841 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table748) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,841 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table507
2023-07-17 21:53:13,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,842 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table507) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,842 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table749
2023-07-17 21:53:13,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,842 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table749) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,842 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table508
2023-07-17 21:53:13,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,842 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table508) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,842 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1280
2023-07-17 21:53:13,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,843 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1280) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,843 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table509
2023-07-17 21:53:13,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,843 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table509) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,843 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1047
2023-07-17 21:53:13,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,843 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1047) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,844 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1289
2023-07-17 21:53:13,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,844 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1289) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,844 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1048
2023-07-17 21:53:13,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,844 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1048) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,844 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1049
2023-07-17 21:53:13,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,845 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1049) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,845 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1270
2023-07-17 21:53:13,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,845 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1270) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,845 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1271
2023-07-17 21:53:13,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,846 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1271) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,846 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1030
2023-07-17 21:53:13,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,846 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1030) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,846 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1272
2023-07-17 21:53:13,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,846 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1272) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,847 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1031
2023-07-17 21:53:13,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,847 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1031) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,847 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1273
2023-07-17 21:53:13,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,847 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1273) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,847 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table970
2023-07-17 21:53:13,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,848 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table970) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,848 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1032
2023-07-17 21:53:13,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,848 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1032) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,848 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1274
2023-07-17 21:53:13,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,848 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1274) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,848 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table971
2023-07-17 21:53:13,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,849 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table971) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,849 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1033
2023-07-17 21:53:13,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,849 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1033) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,849 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1275
2023-07-17 21:53:13,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,849 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1275) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,849 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table730
2023-07-17 21:53:13,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,850 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table730) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,850 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table972
2023-07-17 21:53:13,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,850 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table972) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,850 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1034
2023-07-17 21:53:13,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,851 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1034) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,851 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1276
2023-07-17 21:53:13,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,851 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1276) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,851 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table731
2023-07-17 21:53:13,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,851 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table731) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,851 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table973
2023-07-17 21:53:13,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,852 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table973) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,852 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1035
2023-07-17 21:53:13,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,852 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1035) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,852 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1277
2023-07-17 21:53:13,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,852 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1277) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,852 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table732
2023-07-17 21:53:13,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,853 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table732) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,853 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table974
2023-07-17 21:53:13,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,854 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table974) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,854 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table733
2023-07-17 21:53:13,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,854 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table733) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,854 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table975
2023-07-17 21:53:13,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,854 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table975) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,854 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table734
2023-07-17 21:53:13,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,855 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table734) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,855 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table976
2023-07-17 21:53:13,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,855 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table976) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,855 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table735
2023-07-17 21:53:13,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,855 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table735) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,855 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table977
2023-07-17 21:53:13,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,856 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table977) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,856 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table736
2023-07-17 21:53:13,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,856 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table736) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,856 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table978
2023-07-17 21:53:13,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,857 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table978) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,857 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table737
2023-07-17 21:53:13,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,857 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table737) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,857 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table979
2023-07-17 21:53:13,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,857 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table979) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,857 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table738
2023-07-17 21:53:13,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,858 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table738) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,858 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table739
2023-07-17 21:53:13,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,858 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table739) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,858 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1036
2023-07-17 21:53:13,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,858 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1036) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,858 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1278
2023-07-17 21:53:13,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,859 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1278) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,859 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1037
2023-07-17 21:53:13,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,859 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1037) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,859 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1279
2023-07-17 21:53:13,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,860 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1279) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,860 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1038
2023-07-17 21:53:13,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,860 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1038) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,860 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1039
2023-07-17 21:53:13,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,860 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1039) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,860 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table13
2023-07-17 21:53:13,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,861 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table13) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,861 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table361
2023-07-17 21:53:13,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,861 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table361) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,861 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table14
2023-07-17 21:53:13,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,862 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table14) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,862 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table120
2023-07-17 21:53:13,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,862 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table120) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,862 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table362
2023-07-17 21:53:13,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,863 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table362) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,863 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table15
2023-07-17 21:53:13,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,863 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table15) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,863 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table121
2023-07-17 21:53:13,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,863 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table121) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,863 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table363
2023-07-17 21:53:13,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,864 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table363) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,864 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table16
2023-07-17 21:53:13,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,864 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table16) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,864 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table122
2023-07-17 21:53:13,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,865 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table122) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,865 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table364
2023-07-17 21:53:13,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,865 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table364) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,865 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table17
2023-07-17 21:53:13,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,865 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table17) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,865 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table123
2023-07-17 21:53:13,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,866 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table123) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,866 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table365
2023-07-17 21:53:13,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,866 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table365) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,866 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table18
2023-07-17 21:53:13,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,866 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table18) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,866 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table124
2023-07-17 21:53:13,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,867 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table124) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,867 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table366
2023-07-17 21:53:13,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,867 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table366) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,867 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table19
2023-07-17 21:53:13,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,868 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table19) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,868 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table125
2023-07-17 21:53:13,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,868 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table125) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,868 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table367
2023-07-17 21:53:13,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,868 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table367) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,868 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table126
2023-07-17 21:53:13,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,869 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table126) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,869 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table368
2023-07-17 21:53:13,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,869 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table368) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,869 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1420
2023-07-17 21:53:13,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,869 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1420) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,870 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table127
2023-07-17 21:53:13,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,870 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table127) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,870 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table369
2023-07-17 21:53:13,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,870 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table369) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,870 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table128
2023-07-17 21:53:13,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,871 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table128) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,871 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table129
2023-07-17 21:53:13,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,871 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table129) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,871 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1429
2023-07-17 21:53:13,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,872 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1429) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,872 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1421
2023-07-17 21:53:13,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,872 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1421) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,872 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1422
2023-07-17 21:53:13,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,872 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1422) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,872 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1423
2023-07-17 21:53:13,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,873 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1423) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,873 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1424
2023-07-17 21:53:13,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,873 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1424) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,873 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1425
2023-07-17 21:53:13,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,873 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1425) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,873 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table10
2023-07-17 21:53:13,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,874 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table10) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,874 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1426
2023-07-17 21:53:13,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,874 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1426) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,874 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table11
2023-07-17 21:53:13,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,875 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table11) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,875 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table370
2023-07-17 21:53:13,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,875 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table370) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,875 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1427
2023-07-17 21:53:13,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,875 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1427) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,875 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table12
2023-07-17 21:53:13,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,876 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table12) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,876 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table371
2023-07-17 21:53:13,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,876 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table371) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,876 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1428
2023-07-17 21:53:13,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,876 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1428) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,876 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table350
2023-07-17 21:53:13,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,877 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table350) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,877 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table592
2023-07-17 21:53:13,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,877 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table592) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,877 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table351
2023-07-17 21:53:13,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,878 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table351) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,878 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table593
2023-07-17 21:53:13,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,878 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table593) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,878 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table110
2023-07-17 21:53:13,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,878 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table110) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,878 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table352
2023-07-17 21:53:13,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,879 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table352) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,879 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table594
2023-07-17 21:53:13,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,879 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table594) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,879 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table111
2023-07-17 21:53:13,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,880 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table111) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,880 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table353
2023-07-17 21:53:13,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,880 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table353) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,880 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table595
2023-07-17 21:53:13,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,880 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table595) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,880 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table112
2023-07-17 21:53:13,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,881 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table112) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,881 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table354
2023-07-17 21:53:13,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,881 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table354) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,881 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table596
2023-07-17 21:53:13,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,882 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table596) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,882 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table113
2023-07-17 21:53:13,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,882 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table113) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,882 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table355
2023-07-17 21:53:13,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,882 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table355) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,882 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table597
2023-07-17 21:53:13,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,883 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table597) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,883 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table114
2023-07-17 21:53:13,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,883 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table114) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,883 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table356
2023-07-17 21:53:13,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,883 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table356) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,883 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table598
2023-07-17 21:53:13,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,884 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table598) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,884 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table115
2023-07-17 21:53:13,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,884 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table115) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,884 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table357
2023-07-17 21:53:13,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,885 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table357) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,885 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table599
2023-07-17 21:53:13,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,885 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table599) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,885 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table116
2023-07-17 21:53:13,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,885 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table116) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,885 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table358
2023-07-17 21:53:13,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,886 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table358) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,886 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table117
2023-07-17 21:53:13,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,886 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table117) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,886 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table359
2023-07-17 21:53:13,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,886 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table359) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,887 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table118
2023-07-17 21:53:13,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,887 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table118) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,887 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table119
2023-07-17 21:53:13,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,887 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table119) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,887 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1418
2023-07-17 21:53:13,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,888 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1418) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,888 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1419
2023-07-17 21:53:13,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,888 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1419) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,888 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1410
2023-07-17 21:53:13,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,888 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1410) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,889 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1411
2023-07-17 21:53:13,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,889 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1411) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,889 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1412
2023-07-17 21:53:13,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,889 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1412) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,889 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1413
2023-07-17 21:53:13,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,890 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1413) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,890 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1414
2023-07-17 21:53:13,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,890 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1414) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,890 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1415
2023-07-17 21:53:13,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,890 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1415) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,890 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1416
2023-07-17 21:53:13,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,891 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1416) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,891 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table360
2023-07-17 21:53:13,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,891 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table360) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,891 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1417
2023-07-17 21:53:13,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,891 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1417) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,892 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table141
2023-07-17 21:53:13,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,892 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table141) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,892 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table383
2023-07-17 21:53:13,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,892 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table383) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,892 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table142
2023-07-17 21:53:13,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,893 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table142) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,893 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table384
2023-07-17 21:53:13,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,893 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table384) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,893 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table143
2023-07-17 21:53:13,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,893 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table143) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,894 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table385
2023-07-17 21:53:13,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,894 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table385) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,894 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table144
2023-07-17 21:53:13,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,894 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table144) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,894 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table386
2023-07-17 21:53:13,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,895 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table386) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,895 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table145
2023-07-17 21:53:13,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,895 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table145) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,895 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table387
2023-07-17 21:53:13,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,895 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table387) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,895 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table146
2023-07-17 21:53:13,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,896 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table146) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,896 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table388
2023-07-17 21:53:13,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,896 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table388) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,896 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table147
2023-07-17 21:53:13,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,897 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table147) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,897 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table389
2023-07-17 21:53:13,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,897 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table389) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,897 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table148
2023-07-17 21:53:13,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,897 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table148) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,898 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table149
2023-07-17 21:53:13,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,898 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table149) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,898 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,898 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,898 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1407
2023-07-17 21:53:13,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,899 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1407) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,899 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,899 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,899 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1408
2023-07-17 21:53:13,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,899 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1408) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,899 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,900 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,900 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1409
2023-07-17 21:53:13,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,900 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1409) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,900 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,901 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,901 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,901 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,901 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,901 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,901 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1400
2023-07-17 21:53:13,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,902 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1400) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,902 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1401
2023-07-17 21:53:13,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,902 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1401) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,902 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1402
2023-07-17 21:53:13,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,902 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1402) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,902 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table9
2023-07-17 21:53:13,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,903 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table9) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,903 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table390
2023-07-17 21:53:13,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,903 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table390) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,903 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1403
2023-07-17 21:53:13,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,904 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1403) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,904 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table8
2023-07-17 21:53:13,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,904 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table8) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,904 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table391
2023-07-17 21:53:13,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,904 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table391) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,905 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1404
2023-07-17 21:53:13,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,905 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1404) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,905 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-17 21:53:13,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,905 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,905 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table150
2023-07-17 21:53:13,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,906 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table150) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,906 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table392
2023-07-17 21:53:13,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,906 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table392) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,906 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1405
2023-07-17 21:53:13,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,906 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1405) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,906 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-17 21:53:13,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,907 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,907 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table151
2023-07-17 21:53:13,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,907 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table151) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,907 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table393
2023-07-17 21:53:13,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,908 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table393) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,908 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1406
2023-07-17 21:53:13,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,908 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1406) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,908 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table130
2023-07-17 21:53:13,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,908 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table130) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,908 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table372
2023-07-17 21:53:13,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,909 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table372) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,909 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table131
2023-07-17 21:53:13,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,909 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table131) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,909 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table373
2023-07-17 21:53:13,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,909 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table373) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,910 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table132
2023-07-17 21:53:13,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,910 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table132) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,910 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table374
2023-07-17 21:53:13,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,910 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table374) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,910 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table133
2023-07-17 21:53:13,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,911 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table133) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,911 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table375
2023-07-17 21:53:13,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,911 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table375) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,911 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table134
2023-07-17 21:53:13,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,911 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table134) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,911 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table376
2023-07-17 21:53:13,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,912 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table376) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,912 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table135
2023-07-17 21:53:13,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,912 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table135) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,912 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table377
2023-07-17 21:53:13,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,913 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table377) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,913 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table136
2023-07-17 21:53:13,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,913 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table136) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,913 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table378
2023-07-17 21:53:13,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,914 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table378) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,914 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table137
2023-07-17 21:53:13,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,914 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table137) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,914 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table379
2023-07-17 21:53:13,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,915 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table379) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,915 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table138
2023-07-17 21:53:13,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,915 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table138) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,915 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table139
2023-07-17 21:53:13,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,915 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table139) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,915 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table380
2023-07-17 21:53:13,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,916 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table380) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,916 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table381
2023-07-17 21:53:13,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,916 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table381) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,916 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table140
2023-07-17 21:53:13,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,916 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table140) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,917 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table382
2023-07-17 21:53:13,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,917 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table382) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,917 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table57
2023-07-17 21:53:13,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,917 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table57) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,917 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table58
2023-07-17 21:53:13,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,918 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table58) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,918 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table560
2023-07-17 21:53:13,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,918 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table560) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,918 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table59
2023-07-17 21:53:13,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,918 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table59) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,918 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table561
2023-07-17 21:53:13,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,919 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table561) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,919 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table320
2023-07-17 21:53:13,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,919 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table320) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,919 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table562
2023-07-17 21:53:13,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,920 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table562) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,920 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1460
2023-07-17 21:53:13,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,920 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1460) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,920 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table321
2023-07-17 21:53:13,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,920 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table321) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,920 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table563
2023-07-17 21:53:13,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,921 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table563) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,921 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1461
2023-07-17 21:53:13,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,921 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1461) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,921 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table322
2023-07-17 21:53:13,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,921 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table322) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,921 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table564
2023-07-17 21:53:13,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,922 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table564) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,922 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1220
2023-07-17 21:53:13,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,922 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1220) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,923 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1462
2023-07-17 21:53:13,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,923 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1462) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,923 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table323
2023-07-17 21:53:13,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,923 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table323) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,923 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table565
2023-07-17 21:53:13,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,924 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table565) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,924 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1221
2023-07-17 21:53:13,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,924 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1221) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,924 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1463
2023-07-17 21:53:13,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,924 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1463) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,924 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table324
2023-07-17 21:53:13,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,925 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table324) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,925 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table566
2023-07-17 21:53:13,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,925 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table566) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,925 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1222
2023-07-17 21:53:13,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,926 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1222) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,926 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1464
2023-07-17 21:53:13,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,926 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1464) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,926 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table325
2023-07-17 21:53:13,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,926 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table325) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,926 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table567
2023-07-17 21:53:13,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,927 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table567) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,927 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table326
2023-07-17 21:53:13,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,927 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table326) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,927 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table568
2023-07-17 21:53:13,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,927 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table568) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,927 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table327
2023-07-17 21:53:13,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,928 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table327) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,928 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table569
2023-07-17 21:53:13,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,928 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table569) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,928 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table328
2023-07-17 21:53:13,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,929 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table328) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,929 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table329
2023-07-17 21:53:13,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,929 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table329) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,929 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1223
2023-07-17 21:53:13,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,929 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1223) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,929 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1465
2023-07-17 21:53:13,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,930 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1465) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,930 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table50
2023-07-17 21:53:13,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,930 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table50) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,930 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1224
2023-07-17 21:53:13,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,930 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1224) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,931 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1466
2023-07-17 21:53:13,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,931 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1466) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,931 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table51
2023-07-17 21:53:13,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,932 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table51) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,932 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1225
2023-07-17 21:53:13,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,932 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1225) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,932 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1467
2023-07-17 21:53:13,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,932 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1467) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,932 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table52
2023-07-17 21:53:13,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,933 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table52) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,933 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1226
2023-07-17 21:53:13,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,933 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1226) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,933 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1468
2023-07-17 21:53:13,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,933 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1468) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,933 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table53
2023-07-17 21:53:13,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,934 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table53) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,934 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1227
2023-07-17 21:53:13,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,934 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1227) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,934 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1469
2023-07-17 21:53:13,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,935 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1469) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,935 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table54
2023-07-17 21:53:13,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,935 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table54) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,935 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1228
2023-07-17 21:53:13,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,935 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1228) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,935 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table55
2023-07-17 21:53:13,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,936 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table55) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,936 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1229
2023-07-17 21:53:13,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,936 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1229) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,936 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table56
2023-07-17 21:53:13,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,936 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table56) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,936 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table46
2023-07-17 21:53:13,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,937 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table46) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,937 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table790
2023-07-17 21:53:13,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,937 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table790) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,937 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table47
2023-07-17 21:53:13,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,938 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table47) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,938 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table791
2023-07-17 21:53:13,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,938 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table791) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,938 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table48
2023-07-17 21:53:13,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,938 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table48) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,938 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table550
2023-07-17 21:53:13,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,939 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table550) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,939 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table792
2023-07-17 21:53:13,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,939 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table792) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,939 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table49
2023-07-17 21:53:13,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,940 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table49) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,940 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table551
2023-07-17 21:53:13,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,940 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table551) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,940 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table793
2023-07-17 21:53:13,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,941 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table793) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,941 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table310
2023-07-17 21:53:13,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,941 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table310) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,941 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table552
2023-07-17 21:53:13,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,941 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table552) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,941 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table794
2023-07-17 21:53:13,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,942 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table794) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,942 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1450
2023-07-17 21:53:13,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,943 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1450) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,943 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table311
2023-07-17 21:53:13,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,943 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table311) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,943 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table553
2023-07-17 21:53:13,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,943 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table553) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,943 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table795
2023-07-17 21:53:13,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,944 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table795) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,944 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1451
2023-07-17 21:53:13,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,944 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1451) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,944 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table312
2023-07-17 21:53:13,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,944 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table312) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,944 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table554
2023-07-17 21:53:13,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,945 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table554) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,945 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table796
2023-07-17 21:53:13,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,945 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table796) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,945 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1210
2023-07-17 21:53:13,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,946 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1210) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,946 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1452
2023-07-17 21:53:13,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,946 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1452) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,946 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table313
2023-07-17 21:53:13,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,947 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table313) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,947 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table555
2023-07-17 21:53:13,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,947 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table555) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,947 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table797
2023-07-17 21:53:13,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,947 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table797) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,947 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1211
2023-07-17 21:53:13,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,948 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1211) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,948 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1453
2023-07-17 21:53:13,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,948 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1453) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,948 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table314
2023-07-17 21:53:13,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,949 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table314) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,949 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table556
2023-07-17 21:53:13,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,949 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table556) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,949 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table798
2023-07-17 21:53:13,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,950 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table798) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,950 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table315
2023-07-17 21:53:13,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,950 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table315) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,950 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table557
2023-07-17 21:53:13,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,950 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table557) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,950 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table799
2023-07-17 21:53:13,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,951 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table799) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,951 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table316
2023-07-17 21:53:13,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,951 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table316) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,951 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table558
2023-07-17 21:53:13,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,952 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table558) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,952 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table317
2023-07-17 21:53:13,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,952 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table317) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,952 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table559
2023-07-17 21:53:13,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,952 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table559) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,952 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table318
2023-07-17 21:53:13,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,953 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table318) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,953 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table319
2023-07-17 21:53:13,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,953 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table319) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,953 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1212
2023-07-17 21:53:13,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,953 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1212) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,953 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1454
2023-07-17 21:53:13,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,954 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1454) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,954 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1213
2023-07-17 21:53:13,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,954 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1213) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,954 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1455
2023-07-17 21:53:13,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,955 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1455) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,955 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table40
2023-07-17 21:53:13,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,955 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table40) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,955 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1214
2023-07-17 21:53:13,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,955 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1214) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,955 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1456
2023-07-17 21:53:13,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,956 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1456) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,956 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table41
2023-07-17 21:53:13,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,956 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table41) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,956 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1215
2023-07-17 21:53:13,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,956 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1215) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,957 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1457
2023-07-17 21:53:13,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,957 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1457) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,957 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table42
2023-07-17 21:53:13,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,957 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table42) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,957 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1216
2023-07-17 21:53:13,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,958 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1216) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,958 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1458
2023-07-17 21:53:13,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,958 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1458) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,958 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table43
2023-07-17 21:53:13,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,959 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table43) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,959 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1217
2023-07-17 21:53:13,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,959 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1217) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,959 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1459
2023-07-17 21:53:13,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,959 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1459) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,960 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table44
2023-07-17 21:53:13,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,960 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table44) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,960 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1218
2023-07-17 21:53:13,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,960 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1218) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,960 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table45
2023-07-17 21:53:13,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,961 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table45) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,961 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1219
2023-07-17 21:53:13,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,961 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1219) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,961 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table35
2023-07-17 21:53:13,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,962 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table35) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,962 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table581
2023-07-17 21:53:13,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,963 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table581) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,963 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table36
2023-07-17 21:53:13,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,963 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table36) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,963 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table340
2023-07-17 21:53:13,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,964 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table340) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,964 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table582
2023-07-17 21:53:13,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,965 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table582) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,965 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table37
2023-07-17 21:53:13,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,965 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table37) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,965 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table341
2023-07-17 21:53:13,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,966 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table341) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,966 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table583
2023-07-17 21:53:13,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,967 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table583) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,967 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table38
2023-07-17 21:53:13,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,967 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table38) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,968 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table100
2023-07-17 21:53:13,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,968 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table100) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,968 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table342
2023-07-17 21:53:13,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,969 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table342) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,969 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table584
2023-07-17 21:53:13,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,970 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table584) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,970 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table39
2023-07-17 21:53:13,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,970 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table39) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,970 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table101
2023-07-17 21:53:13,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,971 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table101) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,971 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table343
2023-07-17 21:53:13,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,972 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table343) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,972 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table585
2023-07-17 21:53:13,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,972 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table585) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,972 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table102
2023-07-17 21:53:13,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,973 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table102) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,973 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table344
2023-07-17 21:53:13,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,973 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table344) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,973 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table586
2023-07-17 21:53:13,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,973 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table586) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,973 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1440
2023-07-17 21:53:13,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,974 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1440) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,974 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table103
2023-07-17 21:53:13,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,974 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table103) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,974 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table345
2023-07-17 21:53:13,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,974 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table345) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,975 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table587
2023-07-17 21:53:13,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,975 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table587) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,975 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1441
2023-07-17 21:53:13,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,975 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1441) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,975 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table104
2023-07-17 21:53:13,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,976 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table104) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,976 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table346
2023-07-17 21:53:13,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,976 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table346) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,976 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table588
2023-07-17 21:53:13,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,976 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table588) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,976 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1200
2023-07-17 21:53:13,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,977 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1200) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,977 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1442
2023-07-17 21:53:13,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,977 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1442) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,977 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table105
2023-07-17 21:53:13,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,977 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table105) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,978 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table347
2023-07-17 21:53:13,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,978 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table347) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,978 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table589
2023-07-17 21:53:13,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,978 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table589) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,978 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table106
2023-07-17 21:53:13,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,979 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table106) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,979 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table348
2023-07-17 21:53:13,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,979 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table348) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,979 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table107
2023-07-17 21:53:13,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,979 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table107) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,980 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table349
2023-07-17 21:53:13,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,980 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table349) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,980 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table108
2023-07-17 21:53:13,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,980 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table108) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,980 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table109
2023-07-17 21:53:13,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,981 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table109) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,981 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1209
2023-07-17 21:53:13,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,981 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1209) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,981 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1201
2023-07-17 21:53:13,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,982 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1201) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,982 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1443
2023-07-17 21:53:13,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,982 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1443) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,982 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1202
2023-07-17 21:53:13,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,982 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1202) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,982 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1444
2023-07-17 21:53:13,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,983 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1444) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,983 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1203
2023-07-17 21:53:13,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,983 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1203) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,983 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1445
2023-07-17 21:53:13,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,983 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1445) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,983 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table30
2023-07-17 21:53:13,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,984 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table30) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,984 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1204
2023-07-17 21:53:13,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,984 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1204) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,984 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1446
2023-07-17 21:53:13,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,985 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1446) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,985 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table31
2023-07-17 21:53:13,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,985 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table31) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,985 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1205
2023-07-17 21:53:13,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,985 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1205) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,985 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1447
2023-07-17 21:53:13,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,986 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1447) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,986 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table32
2023-07-17 21:53:13,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,986 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table32) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,986 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1206
2023-07-17 21:53:13,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,986 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1206) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,986 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1448
2023-07-17 21:53:13,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,987 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1448) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,987 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table33
2023-07-17 21:53:13,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,987 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table33) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,987 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table590
2023-07-17 21:53:13,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,988 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table590) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,988 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1207
2023-07-17 21:53:13,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,988 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1207) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,988 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1449
2023-07-17 21:53:13,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,988 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1449) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,988 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table34
2023-07-17 21:53:13,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,989 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table34) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,989 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table591
2023-07-17 21:53:13,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,989 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table591) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,989 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1208
2023-07-17 21:53:13,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,990 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1208) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,990 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table24
2023-07-17 21:53:13,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,990 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table24) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,990 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table570
2023-07-17 21:53:13,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,990 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table570) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,990 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table25
2023-07-17 21:53:13,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,991 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table25) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,991 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table571
2023-07-17 21:53:13,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,991 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table571) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,991 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table26
2023-07-17 21:53:13,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,991 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table26) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,992 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table330
2023-07-17 21:53:13,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,992 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table330) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,992 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table572
2023-07-17 21:53:13,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,992 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table572) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,992 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table27
2023-07-17 21:53:13,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,993 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table27) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,993 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table331
2023-07-17 21:53:13,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,993 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table331) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,993 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table573
2023-07-17 21:53:13,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,993 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table573) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,993 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table28
2023-07-17 21:53:13,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,994 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table28) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,994 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table332
2023-07-17 21:53:13,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,994 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table332) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,994 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table574
2023-07-17 21:53:13,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,995 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table574) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,995 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table29
2023-07-17 21:53:13,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,995 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table29) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,995 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table333
2023-07-17 21:53:13,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,995 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table333) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,995 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table575
2023-07-17 21:53:13,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,996 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table575) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,996 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table334
2023-07-17 21:53:13,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,996 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table334) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,996 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table576
2023-07-17 21:53:13,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,996 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table576) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,997 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1430
2023-07-17 21:53:13,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,997 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1430) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,997 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table335
2023-07-17 21:53:13,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,997 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table335) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,997 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table577
2023-07-17 21:53:13,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,998 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table577) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,998 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1431
2023-07-17 21:53:13,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,998 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1431) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,998 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table336
2023-07-17 21:53:13,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,999 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table336) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,999 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table578
2023-07-17 21:53:13,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,999 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table578) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,999 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table337
2023-07-17 21:53:13,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:13,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:13,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:13,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,999 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table337) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:13,999 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table579
2023-07-17 21:53:13,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:13,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:13,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:13,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:13,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,000 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table579) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,000 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table338
2023-07-17 21:53:14,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,000 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table338) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,000 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table339
2023-07-17 21:53:14,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,000 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table339) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,000 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1432
2023-07-17 21:53:14,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,001 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1432) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,001 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1433
2023-07-17 21:53:14,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,001 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1433) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,001 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1434
2023-07-17 21:53:14,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,002 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1434) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,002 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1435
2023-07-17 21:53:14,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,002 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1435) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,002 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table20
2023-07-17 21:53:14,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,002 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table20) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,002 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1436
2023-07-17 21:53:14,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,003 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1436) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,003 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table21
2023-07-17 21:53:14,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,003 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table21) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,003 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1437
2023-07-17 21:53:14,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,003 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1437) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,003 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table22
2023-07-17 21:53:14,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,004 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table22) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,004 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1438
2023-07-17 21:53:14,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,004 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1438) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,004 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table23
2023-07-17 21:53:14,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,005 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table23) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,005 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table580
2023-07-17 21:53:14,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,005 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table580) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,005 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1439
2023-07-17 21:53:14,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,006 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1439) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,006 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table284
2023-07-17 21:53:14,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,006 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table284) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,006 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table285
2023-07-17 21:53:14,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,006 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table285) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,006 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table286
2023-07-17 21:53:14,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,007 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table286) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,007 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table287
2023-07-17 21:53:14,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,007 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table287) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,007 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table288
2023-07-17 21:53:14,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,007 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table288) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,008 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table289
2023-07-17 21:53:14,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,008 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table289) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,008 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table290
2023-07-17 21:53:14,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,008 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table290) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,008 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table291
2023-07-17 21:53:14,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,009 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table291) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,009 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table292
2023-07-17 21:53:14,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,009 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table292) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,009 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table293
2023-07-17 21:53:14,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,009 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table293) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,009 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table294
2023-07-17 21:53:14,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,010 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table294) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,010 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table273
2023-07-17 21:53:14,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,010 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table273) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,010 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table274
2023-07-17 21:53:14,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,011 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table274) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,011 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table275
2023-07-17 21:53:14,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,011 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table275) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,012 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table276
2023-07-17 21:53:14,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,012 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table276) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,012 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table277
2023-07-17 21:53:14,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,013 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table277) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,013 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table278
2023-07-17 21:53:14,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,013 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table278) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,013 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table279
2023-07-17 21:53:14,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,014 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table279) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,014 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table280
2023-07-17 21:53:14,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,015 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table280) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,015 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table281
2023-07-17 21:53:14,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,015 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table281) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,015 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table282
2023-07-17 21:53:14,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,016 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table282) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,016 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table283
2023-07-17 21:53:14,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,016 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table283) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,016 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table295
2023-07-17 21:53:14,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,017 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table295) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,017 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table296
2023-07-17 21:53:14,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,017 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table296) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,017 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table297
2023-07-17 21:53:14,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,018 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table297) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,018 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table298
2023-07-17 21:53:14,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,018 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table298) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,018 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table299
2023-07-17 21:53:14,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,018 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table299) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,019 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table920
2023-07-17 21:53:14,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,019 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table920) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,019 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table921
2023-07-17 21:53:14,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,019 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table921) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,019 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table922
2023-07-17 21:53:14,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,020 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table922) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,020 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table923
2023-07-17 21:53:14,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,020 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table923) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,020 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table924
2023-07-17 21:53:14,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,020 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table924) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,020 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table925
2023-07-17 21:53:14,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,021 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table925) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,021 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table926
2023-07-17 21:53:14,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,021 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table926) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,021 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table927
2023-07-17 21:53:14,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,021 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table927) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,022 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table928
2023-07-17 21:53:14,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,022 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table928) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,022 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table929
2023-07-17 21:53:14,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,022 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table929) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,022 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1094
2023-07-17 21:53:14,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,023 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1094) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,023 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1095
2023-07-17 21:53:14,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,023 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1095) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,023 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1096
2023-07-17 21:53:14,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,023 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1096) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,023 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1097
2023-07-17 21:53:14,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,024 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1097) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,024 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1098
2023-07-17 21:53:14,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,024 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1098) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,024 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1099
2023-07-17 21:53:14,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,024 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1099) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,025 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table910
2023-07-17 21:53:14,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,025 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table910) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,025 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table911
2023-07-17 21:53:14,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,026 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table911) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,026 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table912
2023-07-17 21:53:14,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,026 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table912) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,026 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1090
2023-07-17 21:53:14,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,026 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1090) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,026 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table913
2023-07-17 21:53:14,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,027 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table913) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,027 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1091
2023-07-17 21:53:14,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,027 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1091) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,027 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table914
2023-07-17 21:53:14,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,027 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table914) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,027 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1092
2023-07-17 21:53:14,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,028 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1092) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,028 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table915
2023-07-17 21:53:14,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,028 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table915) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,028 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1093
2023-07-17 21:53:14,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,029 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1093) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,029 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table916
2023-07-17 21:53:14,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,029 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table916) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,029 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table917
2023-07-17 21:53:14,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,029 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table917) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,029 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table918
2023-07-17 21:53:14,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,030 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table918) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,030 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table919
2023-07-17 21:53:14,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,030 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table919) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,030 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1083
2023-07-17 21:53:14,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,030 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1083) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,030 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1084
2023-07-17 21:53:14,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,031 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1084) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,031 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1085
2023-07-17 21:53:14,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,031 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1085) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,031 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1086
2023-07-17 21:53:14,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,032 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1086) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,032 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1087
2023-07-17 21:53:14,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,032 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1087) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,032 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1088
2023-07-17 21:53:14,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,032 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1088) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,032 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1089
2023-07-17 21:53:14,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,033 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1089) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,033 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table940
2023-07-17 21:53:14,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,033 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table940) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,033 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table941
2023-07-17 21:53:14,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,034 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table941) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,034 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table700
2023-07-17 21:53:14,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,034 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table700) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,034 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table942
2023-07-17 21:53:14,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,034 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table942) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,034 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table701
2023-07-17 21:53:14,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,035 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table701) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,035 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table943
2023-07-17 21:53:14,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,035 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table943) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,035 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table702
2023-07-17 21:53:14,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,036 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table702) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,036 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table944
2023-07-17 21:53:14,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,036 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table944) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,036 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table703
2023-07-17 21:53:14,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,036 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table703) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,036 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table945
2023-07-17 21:53:14,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,037 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table945) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,037 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table704
2023-07-17 21:53:14,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,037 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table704) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,037 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table946
2023-07-17 21:53:14,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,037 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table946) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,037 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1080
2023-07-17 21:53:14,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,038 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1080) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,038 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table705
2023-07-17 21:53:14,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,038 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table705) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,038 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table947
2023-07-17 21:53:14,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,039 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table947) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,039 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1081
2023-07-17 21:53:14,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,039 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1081) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,039 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table706
2023-07-17 21:53:14,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,039 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table706) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,039 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table948
2023-07-17 21:53:14,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,040 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table948) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,040 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1082
2023-07-17 21:53:14,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,040 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1082) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,040 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table707
2023-07-17 21:53:14,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,040 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table707) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,040 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table949
2023-07-17 21:53:14,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,041 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table949) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,041 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table708
2023-07-17 21:53:14,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,041 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table708) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,041 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table709
2023-07-17 21:53:14,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,041 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table709) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,042 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1072
2023-07-17 21:53:14,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,042 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1072) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,042 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1073
2023-07-17 21:53:14,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,043 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1073) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,043 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1074
2023-07-17 21:53:14,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,043 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1074) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,043 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1075
2023-07-17 21:53:14,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,043 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1075) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,043 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1076
2023-07-17 21:53:14,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,044 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1076) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,044 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1077
2023-07-17 21:53:14,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,044 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1077) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,044 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1078
2023-07-17 21:53:14,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,044 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1078) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,045 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1079
2023-07-17 21:53:14,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,045 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1079) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,045 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table930
2023-07-17 21:53:14,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,045 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table930) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,045 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table931
2023-07-17 21:53:14,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,046 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table931) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,046 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table932
2023-07-17 21:53:14,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,046 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table932) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,046 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table933
2023-07-17 21:53:14,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,046 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table933) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,046 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table934
2023-07-17 21:53:14,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,047 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table934) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,047 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table935
2023-07-17 21:53:14,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,047 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table935) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,047 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table936
2023-07-17 21:53:14,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,047 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table936) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,048 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1070
2023-07-17 21:53:14,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,048 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1070) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,048 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table937
2023-07-17 21:53:14,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,048 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table937) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,048 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1071
2023-07-17 21:53:14,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,049 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1071) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,049 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table938
2023-07-17 21:53:14,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,049 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table938) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,049 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table939
2023-07-17 21:53:14,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,049 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table939) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,049 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table900
2023-07-17 21:53:14,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,050 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table900) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,050 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table901
2023-07-17 21:53:14,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,050 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table901) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,050 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table902
2023-07-17 21:53:14,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,051 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table902) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,051 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table903
2023-07-17 21:53:14,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,051 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table903) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,051 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table904
2023-07-17 21:53:14,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,052 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table904) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,052 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table905
2023-07-17 21:53:14,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,052 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table905) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,052 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table906
2023-07-17 21:53:14,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,052 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table906) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,052 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table907
2023-07-17 21:53:14,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,053 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table907) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,053 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table908
2023-07-17 21:53:14,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,053 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table908) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,053 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table909
2023-07-17 21:53:14,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1192100384=0, srv799843028=4, srv127170706=1, srv946916107=5, srv1916013143=3, srv1853319930=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,053 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table909) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,054 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table13
2023-07-17 21:53:14,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1188487043=1, srv2021692664=9, srv2028806239=10, srv1766751162=6, srv930572340=13, srv970114615=14, srv181938753=7, srv732241351=12, srv1275658743=3, srv1089386676=0, srv1242281043=2, srv1587105782=5, srv63776100=11, srv18558296=8, srv1516644049=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-17 21:53:14,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-17 21:53:14,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-17 21:53:14,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-17 21:53:14,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-17 21:53:14,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=15, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,055 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table13) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,055 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table14
2023-07-17 21:53:14,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1188487043=1, srv2021692664=9, srv2028806239=10, srv1766751162=6, srv930572340=13, srv970114615=14, srv181938753=7, srv732241351=12, srv1275658743=3, srv1089386676=0, srv1242281043=2, srv1587105782=5, srv63776100=11, srv18558296=8, srv1516644049=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-17 21:53:14,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-17 21:53:14,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-17 21:53:14,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-17 21:53:14,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-17 21:53:14,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=15, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,056 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table14) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,056 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1188487043=1, srv2021692664=9, srv2028806239=10, srv1766751162=6, srv930572340=13, srv970114615=14, srv181938753=7, srv732241351=12, srv1275658743=3, srv1089386676=0, srv1242281043=2, srv1587105782=5, srv63776100=11, srv18558296=8, srv1516644049=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-17 21:53:14,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-17 21:53:14,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-17 21:53:14,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-17 21:53:14,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-17 21:53:14,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=15, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,057 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,057 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1188487043=1, srv2021692664=9, srv2028806239=10, srv1766751162=6, srv930572340=13, srv970114615=14, srv181938753=7, srv732241351=12, srv1275658743=3, srv1089386676=0, srv1242281043=2, srv1587105782=5, srv63776100=11, srv18558296=8, srv1516644049=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-17 21:53:14,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-17 21:53:14,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-17 21:53:14,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-17 21:53:14,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-17 21:53:14,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=15, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,057 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,057 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1188487043=1, srv2021692664=9, srv2028806239=10, srv1766751162=6, srv930572340=13, srv970114615=14, srv181938753=7, srv732241351=12, srv1275658743=3, srv1089386676=0, srv1242281043=2, srv1587105782=5, srv63776100=11, srv18558296=8, srv1516644049=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-17 21:53:14,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-17 21:53:14,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-17 21:53:14,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-17 21:53:14,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-17 21:53:14,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=15, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,058 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,058 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1188487043=1, srv2021692664=9, srv2028806239=10, srv1766751162=6, srv930572340=13, srv970114615=14, srv181938753=7, srv732241351=12, srv1275658743=3, srv1089386676=0, srv1242281043=2, srv1587105782=5, srv63776100=11, srv18558296=8, srv1516644049=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-17 21:53:14,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-17 21:53:14,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-17 21:53:14,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-17 21:53:14,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-17 21:53:14,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=15, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,059 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,059 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1188487043=1, srv2021692664=9, srv2028806239=10, srv1766751162=6, srv930572340=13, srv970114615=14, srv181938753=7, srv732241351=12, srv1275658743=3, srv1089386676=0, srv1242281043=2, srv1587105782=5, srv63776100=11, srv18558296=8, srv1516644049=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-17 21:53:14,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-17 21:53:14,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-17 21:53:14,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-17 21:53:14,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-17 21:53:14,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=15, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,060 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,060 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1188487043=1, srv2021692664=9, srv2028806239=10, srv1766751162=6, srv930572340=13, srv970114615=14, srv181938753=7, srv732241351=12, srv1275658743=3, srv1089386676=0, srv1242281043=2, srv1587105782=5, srv63776100=11, srv18558296=8, srv1516644049=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-17 21:53:14,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-17 21:53:14,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-17 21:53:14,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-17 21:53:14,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-17 21:53:14,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=15, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,061 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,061 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1188487043=1, srv2021692664=9, srv2028806239=10, srv1766751162=6, srv930572340=13, srv970114615=14, srv181938753=7, srv732241351=12, srv1275658743=3, srv1089386676=0, srv1242281043=2, srv1587105782=5, srv63776100=11, srv18558296=8, srv1516644049=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-17 21:53:14,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-17 21:53:14,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-17 21:53:14,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-17 21:53:14,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-17 21:53:14,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=15, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,062 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table9) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,062 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1188487043=1, srv2021692664=9, srv2028806239=10, srv1766751162=6, srv930572340=13, srv970114615=14, srv181938753=7, srv732241351=12, srv1275658743=3, srv1089386676=0, srv1242281043=2, srv1587105782=5, srv63776100=11, srv18558296=8, srv1516644049=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-17 21:53:14,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-17 21:53:14,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-17 21:53:14,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-17 21:53:14,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-17 21:53:14,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=15, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,063 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table8) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,063 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table10
2023-07-17 21:53:14,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1188487043=1, srv2021692664=9, srv2028806239=10, srv1766751162=6, srv930572340=13, srv970114615=14, srv181938753=7, srv732241351=12, srv1275658743=3, srv1089386676=0, srv1242281043=2, srv1587105782=5, srv63776100=11, srv18558296=8, srv1516644049=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-17 21:53:14,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-17 21:53:14,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-17 21:53:14,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-17 21:53:14,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-17 21:53:14,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=15, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,064 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table10) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,064 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1188487043=1, srv2021692664=9, srv2028806239=10, srv1766751162=6, srv930572340=13, srv970114615=14, srv181938753=7, srv732241351=12, srv1275658743=3, srv1089386676=0, srv1242281043=2, srv1587105782=5, srv63776100=11, srv18558296=8, srv1516644049=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-17 21:53:14,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-17 21:53:14,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-17 21:53:14,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-17 21:53:14,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-17 21:53:14,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=15, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,064 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,064 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table11
2023-07-17 21:53:14,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1188487043=1, srv2021692664=9, srv2028806239=10, srv1766751162=6, srv930572340=13, srv970114615=14, srv181938753=7, srv732241351=12, srv1275658743=3, srv1089386676=0, srv1242281043=2, srv1587105782=5, srv63776100=11, srv18558296=8, srv1516644049=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-17 21:53:14,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-17 21:53:14,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-17 21:53:14,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-17 21:53:14,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-17 21:53:14,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=15, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,065 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table11) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,065 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1188487043=1, srv2021692664=9, srv2028806239=10, srv1766751162=6, srv930572340=13, srv970114615=14, srv181938753=7, srv732241351=12, srv1275658743=3, srv1089386676=0, srv1242281043=2, srv1587105782=5, srv63776100=11, srv18558296=8, srv1516644049=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-17 21:53:14,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-17 21:53:14,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-17 21:53:14,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-17 21:53:14,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-17 21:53:14,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=15, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,066 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,066 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table12
2023-07-17 21:53:14,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1188487043=1, srv2021692664=9, srv2028806239=10, srv1766751162=6, srv930572340=13, srv970114615=14, srv181938753=7, srv732241351=12, srv1275658743=3, srv1089386676=0, srv1242281043=2, srv1587105782=5, srv63776100=11, srv18558296=8, srv1516644049=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-17 21:53:14,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-17 21:53:14,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-17 21:53:14,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-17 21:53:14,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-17 21:53:14,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=15, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,066 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table12) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,067 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv931507742=8, srv437270105=5, srv1517081729=3, srv660077089=7, srv1805454441=4, srv976980462=9, srv456523305=6, srv1132418151=0, srv1179798206=1, srv1427347681=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,067 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,067 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv931507742=8, srv437270105=5, srv1517081729=3, srv660077089=7, srv1805454441=4, srv976980462=9, srv456523305=6, srv1132418151=0, srv1179798206=1, srv1427347681=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,068 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,068 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv931507742=8, srv437270105=5, srv1517081729=3, srv660077089=7, srv1805454441=4, srv976980462=9, srv456523305=6, srv1132418151=0, srv1179798206=1, srv1427347681=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,068 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,068 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv931507742=8, srv437270105=5, srv1517081729=3, srv660077089=7, srv1805454441=4, srv976980462=9, srv456523305=6, srv1132418151=0, srv1179798206=1, srv1427347681=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,069 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,069 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv931507742=8, srv437270105=5, srv1517081729=3, srv660077089=7, srv1805454441=4, srv976980462=9, srv456523305=6, srv1132418151=0, srv1179798206=1, srv1427347681=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,069 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,069 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv931507742=8, srv437270105=5, srv1517081729=3, srv660077089=7, srv1805454441=4, srv976980462=9, srv456523305=6, srv1132418151=0, srv1179798206=1, srv1427347681=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,070 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,070 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv931507742=8, srv437270105=5, srv1517081729=3, srv660077089=7, srv1805454441=4, srv976980462=9, srv456523305=6, srv1132418151=0, srv1179798206=1, srv1427347681=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,070 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table9) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,070 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv931507742=8, srv437270105=5, srv1517081729=3, srv660077089=7, srv1805454441=4, srv976980462=9, srv456523305=6, srv1132418151=0, srv1179798206=1, srv1427347681=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,071 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table8) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,071 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv931507742=8, srv437270105=5, srv1517081729=3, srv660077089=7, srv1805454441=4, srv976980462=9, srv456523305=6, srv1132418151=0, srv1179798206=1, srv1427347681=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,071 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,071 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv931507742=8, srv437270105=5, srv1517081729=3, srv660077089=7, srv1805454441=4, srv976980462=9, srv456523305=6, srv1132418151=0, srv1179798206=1, srv1427347681=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,072 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,073 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv956941753=9, srv805881252=7, srv158091907=2, srv1837813270=3, srv1399832634=0, srv1996299619=4, srv345087284=5, srv924548146=8, srv541251345=6, srv1481427863=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,073 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,073 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv956941753=9, srv805881252=7, srv158091907=2, srv1837813270=3, srv1399832634=0, srv1996299619=4, srv345087284=5, srv924548146=8, srv541251345=6, srv1481427863=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,074 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,074 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv956941753=9, srv805881252=7, srv158091907=2, srv1837813270=3, srv1399832634=0, srv1996299619=4, srv345087284=5, srv924548146=8, srv541251345=6, srv1481427863=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,074 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,074 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv956941753=9, srv805881252=7, srv158091907=2, srv1837813270=3, srv1399832634=0, srv1996299619=4, srv345087284=5, srv924548146=8, srv541251345=6, srv1481427863=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,075 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,075 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv956941753=9, srv805881252=7, srv158091907=2, srv1837813270=3, srv1399832634=0, srv1996299619=4, srv345087284=5, srv924548146=8, srv541251345=6, srv1481427863=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,075 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,076 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv956941753=9, srv805881252=7, srv158091907=2, srv1837813270=3, srv1399832634=0, srv1996299619=4, srv345087284=5, srv924548146=8, srv541251345=6, srv1481427863=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,076 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,076 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table13
2023-07-17 21:53:14,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv152676684=4, srv194402874=5, srv1061564807=0, srv1401731394=2, srv1175630566=1, srv300261054=7, srv35949516=8, srv2028420832=6, srv719875143=9, srv1430176194=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,077 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table13) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,077 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table14
2023-07-17 21:53:14,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv152676684=4, srv194402874=5, srv1061564807=0, srv1401731394=2, srv1175630566=1, srv300261054=7, srv35949516=8, srv2028420832=6, srv719875143=9, srv1430176194=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,078 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table14) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,078 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table15
2023-07-17 21:53:14,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv152676684=4, srv194402874=5, srv1061564807=0, srv1401731394=2, srv1175630566=1, srv300261054=7, srv35949516=8, srv2028420832=6, srv719875143=9, srv1430176194=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,078 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table15) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,078 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table16
2023-07-17 21:53:14,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv152676684=4, srv194402874=5, srv1061564807=0, srv1401731394=2, srv1175630566=1, srv300261054=7, srv35949516=8, srv2028420832=6, srv719875143=9, srv1430176194=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,079 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table16) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,079 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table17
2023-07-17 21:53:14,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv152676684=4, srv194402874=5, srv1061564807=0, srv1401731394=2, srv1175630566=1, srv300261054=7, srv35949516=8, srv2028420832=6, srv719875143=9, srv1430176194=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,079 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table17) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,079 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table18
2023-07-17 21:53:14,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv152676684=4, srv194402874=5, srv1061564807=0, srv1401731394=2, srv1175630566=1, srv300261054=7, srv35949516=8, srv2028420832=6, srv719875143=9, srv1430176194=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,080 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table18) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,080 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table19
2023-07-17 21:53:14,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv152676684=4, srv194402874=5, srv1061564807=0, srv1401731394=2, srv1175630566=1, srv300261054=7, srv35949516=8, srv2028420832=6, srv719875143=9, srv1430176194=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,080 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table19) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,080 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table50
2023-07-17 21:53:14,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv152676684=4, srv194402874=5, srv1061564807=0, srv1401731394=2, srv1175630566=1, srv300261054=7, srv35949516=8, srv2028420832=6, srv719875143=9, srv1430176194=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,081 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table50) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,081 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table51
2023-07-17 21:53:14,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv152676684=4, srv194402874=5, srv1061564807=0, srv1401731394=2, srv1175630566=1, srv300261054=7, srv35949516=8, srv2028420832=6, srv719875143=9, srv1430176194=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,081 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table51) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,081 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table52
2023-07-17 21:53:14,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv152676684=4, srv194402874=5, srv1061564807=0, srv1401731394=2, srv1175630566=1, srv300261054=7, srv35949516=8, srv2028420832=6, srv719875143=9, srv1430176194=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,082 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table52) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,082 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table53
2023-07-17 21:53:14,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv152676684=4, srv194402874=5, srv1061564807=0, srv1401731394=2, srv1175630566=1, srv300261054=7, srv35949516=8, srv2028420832=6, srv719875143=9, srv1430176194=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,082 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table53) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,082 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table10
2023-07-17 21:53:14,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv152676684=4, srv194402874=5, srv1061564807=0, srv1401731394=2, srv1175630566=1, srv300261054=7, srv35949516=8, srv2028420832=6, srv719875143=9, srv1430176194=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,083 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table10) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,083 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table11
2023-07-17 21:53:14,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv152676684=4, srv194402874=5, srv1061564807=0, srv1401731394=2, srv1175630566=1, srv300261054=7, srv35949516=8, srv2028420832=6, srv719875143=9, srv1430176194=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,084 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table11) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,084 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table12
2023-07-17 21:53:14,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv152676684=4, srv194402874=5, srv1061564807=0, srv1401731394=2, srv1175630566=1, srv300261054=7, srv35949516=8, srv2028420832=6, srv719875143=9, srv1430176194=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,084 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table12) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,084 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table46
2023-07-17 21:53:14,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv152676684=4, srv194402874=5, srv1061564807=0, srv1401731394=2, srv1175630566=1, srv300261054=7, srv35949516=8, srv2028420832=6, srv719875143=9, srv1430176194=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,085 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table46) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,085 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table47
2023-07-17 21:53:14,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv152676684=4, srv194402874=5, srv1061564807=0, srv1401731394=2, srv1175630566=1, srv300261054=7, srv35949516=8, srv2028420832=6, srv719875143=9, srv1430176194=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,085 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table47) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,085 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table48
2023-07-17 21:53:14,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv152676684=4, srv194402874=5, srv1061564807=0, srv1401731394=2, srv1175630566=1, srv300261054=7, srv35949516=8, srv2028420832=6, srv719875143=9, srv1430176194=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,086 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table48) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,086 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table49
2023-07-17 21:53:14,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv152676684=4, srv194402874=5, srv1061564807=0, srv1401731394=2, srv1175630566=1, srv300261054=7, srv35949516=8, srv2028420832=6, srv719875143=9, srv1430176194=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,086 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table49) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,086 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table40
2023-07-17 21:53:14,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv152676684=4, srv194402874=5, srv1061564807=0, srv1401731394=2, srv1175630566=1, srv300261054=7, srv35949516=8, srv2028420832=6, srv719875143=9, srv1430176194=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,087 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table40) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,087 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table41
2023-07-17 21:53:14,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv152676684=4, srv194402874=5, srv1061564807=0, srv1401731394=2, srv1175630566=1, srv300261054=7, srv35949516=8, srv2028420832=6, srv719875143=9, srv1430176194=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,087 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table41) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,087 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table42
2023-07-17 21:53:14,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv152676684=4, srv194402874=5, srv1061564807=0, srv1401731394=2, srv1175630566=1, srv300261054=7, srv35949516=8, srv2028420832=6, srv719875143=9, srv1430176194=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,088 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table42) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,088 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table43
2023-07-17 21:53:14,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv152676684=4, srv194402874=5, srv1061564807=0, srv1401731394=2, srv1175630566=1, srv300261054=7, srv35949516=8, srv2028420832=6, srv719875143=9, srv1430176194=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,088 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table43) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,088 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table44
2023-07-17 21:53:14,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv152676684=4, srv194402874=5, srv1061564807=0, srv1401731394=2, srv1175630566=1, srv300261054=7, srv35949516=8, srv2028420832=6, srv719875143=9, srv1430176194=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,089 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table44) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,089 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table45
2023-07-17 21:53:14,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv152676684=4, srv194402874=5, srv1061564807=0, srv1401731394=2, srv1175630566=1, srv300261054=7, srv35949516=8, srv2028420832=6, srv719875143=9, srv1430176194=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,089 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table45) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,089 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table35
2023-07-17 21:53:14,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv152676684=4, srv194402874=5, srv1061564807=0, srv1401731394=2, srv1175630566=1, srv300261054=7, srv35949516=8, srv2028420832=6, srv719875143=9, srv1430176194=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,090 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table35) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,090 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table36
2023-07-17 21:53:14,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv152676684=4, srv194402874=5, srv1061564807=0, srv1401731394=2, srv1175630566=1, srv300261054=7, srv35949516=8, srv2028420832=6, srv719875143=9, srv1430176194=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,090 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table36) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,090 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table37
2023-07-17 21:53:14,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv152676684=4, srv194402874=5, srv1061564807=0, srv1401731394=2, srv1175630566=1, srv300261054=7, srv35949516=8, srv2028420832=6, srv719875143=9, srv1430176194=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,091 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table37) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,091 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table38
2023-07-17 21:53:14,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv152676684=4, srv194402874=5, srv1061564807=0, srv1401731394=2, srv1175630566=1, srv300261054=7, srv35949516=8, srv2028420832=6, srv719875143=9, srv1430176194=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,091 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table38) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,092 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table39
2023-07-17 21:53:14,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv152676684=4, srv194402874=5, srv1061564807=0, srv1401731394=2, srv1175630566=1, srv300261054=7, srv35949516=8, srv2028420832=6, srv719875143=9, srv1430176194=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,092 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table39) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,092 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv152676684=4, srv194402874=5, srv1061564807=0, srv1401731394=2, srv1175630566=1, srv300261054=7, srv35949516=8, srv2028420832=6, srv719875143=9, srv1430176194=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,093 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,093 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv152676684=4, srv194402874=5, srv1061564807=0, srv1401731394=2, srv1175630566=1, srv300261054=7, srv35949516=8, srv2028420832=6, srv719875143=9, srv1430176194=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,093 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,093 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv152676684=4, srv194402874=5, srv1061564807=0, srv1401731394=2, srv1175630566=1, srv300261054=7, srv35949516=8, srv2028420832=6, srv719875143=9, srv1430176194=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,094 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,094 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv152676684=4, srv194402874=5, srv1061564807=0, srv1401731394=2, srv1175630566=1, srv300261054=7, srv35949516=8, srv2028420832=6, srv719875143=9, srv1430176194=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,094 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,094 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv152676684=4, srv194402874=5, srv1061564807=0, srv1401731394=2, srv1175630566=1, srv300261054=7, srv35949516=8, srv2028420832=6, srv719875143=9, srv1430176194=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,095 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,095 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv152676684=4, srv194402874=5, srv1061564807=0, srv1401731394=2, srv1175630566=1, srv300261054=7, srv35949516=8, srv2028420832=6, srv719875143=9, srv1430176194=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,095 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,095 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table30
2023-07-17 21:53:14,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv152676684=4, srv194402874=5, srv1061564807=0, srv1401731394=2, srv1175630566=1, srv300261054=7, srv35949516=8, srv2028420832=6, srv719875143=9, srv1430176194=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,096 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table30) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,096 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv152676684=4, srv194402874=5, srv1061564807=0, srv1401731394=2, srv1175630566=1, srv300261054=7, srv35949516=8, srv2028420832=6, srv719875143=9, srv1430176194=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,096 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table9) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,096 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table31
2023-07-17 21:53:14,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv152676684=4, srv194402874=5, srv1061564807=0, srv1401731394=2, srv1175630566=1, srv300261054=7, srv35949516=8, srv2028420832=6, srv719875143=9, srv1430176194=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,097 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table31) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,097 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv152676684=4, srv194402874=5, srv1061564807=0, srv1401731394=2, srv1175630566=1, srv300261054=7, srv35949516=8, srv2028420832=6, srv719875143=9, srv1430176194=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,097 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table8) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,097 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table32
2023-07-17 21:53:14,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv152676684=4, srv194402874=5, srv1061564807=0, srv1401731394=2, srv1175630566=1, srv300261054=7, srv35949516=8, srv2028420832=6, srv719875143=9, srv1430176194=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,098 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table32) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,098 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv152676684=4, srv194402874=5, srv1061564807=0, srv1401731394=2, srv1175630566=1, srv300261054=7, srv35949516=8, srv2028420832=6, srv719875143=9, srv1430176194=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,098 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,099 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table33
2023-07-17 21:53:14,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv152676684=4, srv194402874=5, srv1061564807=0, srv1401731394=2, srv1175630566=1, srv300261054=7, srv35949516=8, srv2028420832=6, srv719875143=9, srv1430176194=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,099 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table33) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,099 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv152676684=4, srv194402874=5, srv1061564807=0, srv1401731394=2, srv1175630566=1, srv300261054=7, srv35949516=8, srv2028420832=6, srv719875143=9, srv1430176194=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,099 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,100 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table34
2023-07-17 21:53:14,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv152676684=4, srv194402874=5, srv1061564807=0, srv1401731394=2, srv1175630566=1, srv300261054=7, srv35949516=8, srv2028420832=6, srv719875143=9, srv1430176194=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,100 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table34) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,100 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table24
2023-07-17 21:53:14,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv152676684=4, srv194402874=5, srv1061564807=0, srv1401731394=2, srv1175630566=1, srv300261054=7, srv35949516=8, srv2028420832=6, srv719875143=9, srv1430176194=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,101 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table24) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,101 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table25
2023-07-17 21:53:14,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv152676684=4, srv194402874=5, srv1061564807=0, srv1401731394=2, srv1175630566=1, srv300261054=7, srv35949516=8, srv2028420832=6, srv719875143=9, srv1430176194=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,101 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table25) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,101 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table26
2023-07-17 21:53:14,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv152676684=4, srv194402874=5, srv1061564807=0, srv1401731394=2, srv1175630566=1, srv300261054=7, srv35949516=8, srv2028420832=6, srv719875143=9, srv1430176194=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,102 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table26) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,102 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table27
2023-07-17 21:53:14,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv152676684=4, srv194402874=5, srv1061564807=0, srv1401731394=2, srv1175630566=1, srv300261054=7, srv35949516=8, srv2028420832=6, srv719875143=9, srv1430176194=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,102 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table27) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,103 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table28
2023-07-17 21:53:14,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv152676684=4, srv194402874=5, srv1061564807=0, srv1401731394=2, srv1175630566=1, srv300261054=7, srv35949516=8, srv2028420832=6, srv719875143=9, srv1430176194=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,103 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table28) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,103 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table29
2023-07-17 21:53:14,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv152676684=4, srv194402874=5, srv1061564807=0, srv1401731394=2, srv1175630566=1, srv300261054=7, srv35949516=8, srv2028420832=6, srv719875143=9, srv1430176194=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,103 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table29) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,104 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table20
2023-07-17 21:53:14,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv152676684=4, srv194402874=5, srv1061564807=0, srv1401731394=2, srv1175630566=1, srv300261054=7, srv35949516=8, srv2028420832=6, srv719875143=9, srv1430176194=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,104 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table20) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,104 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table21
2023-07-17 21:53:14,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv152676684=4, srv194402874=5, srv1061564807=0, srv1401731394=2, srv1175630566=1, srv300261054=7, srv35949516=8, srv2028420832=6, srv719875143=9, srv1430176194=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,105 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table21) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,105 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table22
2023-07-17 21:53:14,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv152676684=4, srv194402874=5, srv1061564807=0, srv1401731394=2, srv1175630566=1, srv300261054=7, srv35949516=8, srv2028420832=6, srv719875143=9, srv1430176194=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,105 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table22) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,105 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table23
2023-07-17 21:53:14,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv152676684=4, srv194402874=5, srv1061564807=0, srv1401731394=2, srv1175630566=1, srv300261054=7, srv35949516=8, srv2028420832=6, srv719875143=9, srv1430176194=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,106 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table23) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,106 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table13
2023-07-17 21:53:14,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1299794214=1, srv767736595=8, srv2029665747=3, srv926903657=9, srv1893596182=2, srv2064867563=4, srv638586915=6, srv1197719738=0, srv649224595=7, srv2082504663=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,107 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table13) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,107 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table14
2023-07-17 21:53:14,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1299794214=1, srv767736595=8, srv2029665747=3, srv926903657=9, srv1893596182=2, srv2064867563=4, srv638586915=6, srv1197719738=0, srv649224595=7, srv2082504663=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,107 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table14) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,107 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table15
2023-07-17 21:53:14,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1299794214=1, srv767736595=8, srv2029665747=3, srv926903657=9, srv1893596182=2, srv2064867563=4, srv638586915=6, srv1197719738=0, srv649224595=7, srv2082504663=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,108 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table15) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,108 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table16
2023-07-17 21:53:14,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1299794214=1, srv767736595=8, srv2029665747=3, srv926903657=9, srv1893596182=2, srv2064867563=4, srv638586915=6, srv1197719738=0, srv649224595=7, srv2082504663=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,108 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table16) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,108 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table17
2023-07-17 21:53:14,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1299794214=1, srv767736595=8, srv2029665747=3, srv926903657=9, srv1893596182=2, srv2064867563=4, srv638586915=6, srv1197719738=0, srv649224595=7, srv2082504663=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,109 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table17) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,109 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table18
2023-07-17 21:53:14,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1299794214=1, srv767736595=8, srv2029665747=3, srv926903657=9, srv1893596182=2, srv2064867563=4, srv638586915=6, srv1197719738=0, srv649224595=7, srv2082504663=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,109 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table18) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,109 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table19
2023-07-17 21:53:14,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1299794214=1, srv767736595=8, srv2029665747=3, srv926903657=9, srv1893596182=2, srv2064867563=4, srv638586915=6, srv1197719738=0, srv649224595=7, srv2082504663=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,110 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table19) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,110 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table50
2023-07-17 21:53:14,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1299794214=1, srv767736595=8, srv2029665747=3, srv926903657=9, srv1893596182=2, srv2064867563=4, srv638586915=6, srv1197719738=0, srv649224595=7, srv2082504663=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,110 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table50) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,110 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table51
2023-07-17 21:53:14,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1299794214=1, srv767736595=8, srv2029665747=3, srv926903657=9, srv1893596182=2, srv2064867563=4, srv638586915=6, srv1197719738=0, srv649224595=7, srv2082504663=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,111 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table51) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,111 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table52
2023-07-17 21:53:14,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1299794214=1, srv767736595=8, srv2029665747=3, srv926903657=9, srv1893596182=2, srv2064867563=4, srv638586915=6, srv1197719738=0, srv649224595=7, srv2082504663=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,112 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table52) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,112 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table53
2023-07-17 21:53:14,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1299794214=1, srv767736595=8, srv2029665747=3, srv926903657=9, srv1893596182=2, srv2064867563=4, srv638586915=6, srv1197719738=0, srv649224595=7, srv2082504663=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,112 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table53) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,112 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table10
2023-07-17 21:53:14,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1299794214=1, srv767736595=8, srv2029665747=3, srv926903657=9, srv1893596182=2, srv2064867563=4, srv638586915=6, srv1197719738=0, srv649224595=7, srv2082504663=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,113 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table10) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,113 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table54
2023-07-17 21:53:14,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1299794214=1, srv767736595=8, srv2029665747=3, srv926903657=9, srv1893596182=2, srv2064867563=4, srv638586915=6, srv1197719738=0, srv649224595=7, srv2082504663=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,113 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table54) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,113 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table11
2023-07-17 21:53:14,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1299794214=1, srv767736595=8, srv2029665747=3, srv926903657=9, srv1893596182=2, srv2064867563=4, srv638586915=6, srv1197719738=0, srv649224595=7, srv2082504663=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,114 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table11) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,114 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table12
2023-07-17 21:53:14,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1299794214=1, srv767736595=8, srv2029665747=3, srv926903657=9, srv1893596182=2, srv2064867563=4, srv638586915=6, srv1197719738=0, srv649224595=7, srv2082504663=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,114 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table12) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,114 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table46
2023-07-17 21:53:14,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1299794214=1, srv767736595=8, srv2029665747=3, srv926903657=9, srv1893596182=2, srv2064867563=4, srv638586915=6, srv1197719738=0, srv649224595=7, srv2082504663=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,115 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table46) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,115 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table47
2023-07-17 21:53:14,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1299794214=1, srv767736595=8, srv2029665747=3, srv926903657=9, srv1893596182=2, srv2064867563=4, srv638586915=6, srv1197719738=0, srv649224595=7, srv2082504663=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,115 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table47) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,115 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table48
2023-07-17 21:53:14,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1299794214=1, srv767736595=8, srv2029665747=3, srv926903657=9, srv1893596182=2, srv2064867563=4, srv638586915=6, srv1197719738=0, srv649224595=7, srv2082504663=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,116 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table48) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,116 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table49
2023-07-17 21:53:14,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1299794214=1, srv767736595=8, srv2029665747=3, srv926903657=9, srv1893596182=2, srv2064867563=4, srv638586915=6, srv1197719738=0, srv649224595=7, srv2082504663=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,116 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table49) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,116 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table40
2023-07-17 21:53:14,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1299794214=1, srv767736595=8, srv2029665747=3, srv926903657=9, srv1893596182=2, srv2064867563=4, srv638586915=6, srv1197719738=0, srv649224595=7, srv2082504663=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,117 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table40) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,117 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table41
2023-07-17 21:53:14,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1299794214=1, srv767736595=8, srv2029665747=3, srv926903657=9, srv1893596182=2, srv2064867563=4, srv638586915=6, srv1197719738=0, srv649224595=7, srv2082504663=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,117 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table41) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,117 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table42
2023-07-17 21:53:14,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1299794214=1, srv767736595=8, srv2029665747=3, srv926903657=9, srv1893596182=2, srv2064867563=4, srv638586915=6, srv1197719738=0, srv649224595=7, srv2082504663=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,118 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table42) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,118 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table43
2023-07-17 21:53:14,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1299794214=1, srv767736595=8, srv2029665747=3, srv926903657=9, srv1893596182=2, srv2064867563=4, srv638586915=6, srv1197719738=0, srv649224595=7, srv2082504663=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,118 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table43) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,118 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table44
2023-07-17 21:53:14,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1299794214=1, srv767736595=8, srv2029665747=3, srv926903657=9, srv1893596182=2, srv2064867563=4, srv638586915=6, srv1197719738=0, srv649224595=7, srv2082504663=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,119 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table44) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,119 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table45
2023-07-17 21:53:14,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1299794214=1, srv767736595=8, srv2029665747=3, srv926903657=9, srv1893596182=2, srv2064867563=4, srv638586915=6, srv1197719738=0, srv649224595=7, srv2082504663=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,119 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table45) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,119 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table35
2023-07-17 21:53:14,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1299794214=1, srv767736595=8, srv2029665747=3, srv926903657=9, srv1893596182=2, srv2064867563=4, srv638586915=6, srv1197719738=0, srv649224595=7, srv2082504663=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,120 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table35) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,120 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table36
2023-07-17 21:53:14,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1299794214=1, srv767736595=8, srv2029665747=3, srv926903657=9, srv1893596182=2, srv2064867563=4, srv638586915=6, srv1197719738=0, srv649224595=7, srv2082504663=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,121 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table36) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,121 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table37
2023-07-17 21:53:14,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1299794214=1, srv767736595=8, srv2029665747=3, srv926903657=9, srv1893596182=2, srv2064867563=4, srv638586915=6, srv1197719738=0, srv649224595=7, srv2082504663=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,121 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table37) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,121 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table38
2023-07-17 21:53:14,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1299794214=1, srv767736595=8, srv2029665747=3, srv926903657=9, srv1893596182=2, srv2064867563=4, srv638586915=6, srv1197719738=0, srv649224595=7, srv2082504663=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,122 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table38) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,122 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table39
2023-07-17 21:53:14,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1299794214=1, srv767736595=8, srv2029665747=3, srv926903657=9, srv1893596182=2, srv2064867563=4, srv638586915=6, srv1197719738=0, srv649224595=7, srv2082504663=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,122 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table39) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,122 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1299794214=1, srv767736595=8, srv2029665747=3, srv926903657=9, srv1893596182=2, srv2064867563=4, srv638586915=6, srv1197719738=0, srv649224595=7, srv2082504663=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,123 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,123 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1299794214=1, srv767736595=8, srv2029665747=3, srv926903657=9, srv1893596182=2, srv2064867563=4, srv638586915=6, srv1197719738=0, srv649224595=7, srv2082504663=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,123 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,123 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1299794214=1, srv767736595=8, srv2029665747=3, srv926903657=9, srv1893596182=2, srv2064867563=4, srv638586915=6, srv1197719738=0, srv649224595=7, srv2082504663=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,124 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,124 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1299794214=1, srv767736595=8, srv2029665747=3, srv926903657=9, srv1893596182=2, srv2064867563=4, srv638586915=6, srv1197719738=0, srv649224595=7, srv2082504663=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,124 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,124 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1299794214=1, srv767736595=8, srv2029665747=3, srv926903657=9, srv1893596182=2, srv2064867563=4, srv638586915=6, srv1197719738=0, srv649224595=7, srv2082504663=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,125 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,125 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1299794214=1, srv767736595=8, srv2029665747=3, srv926903657=9, srv1893596182=2, srv2064867563=4, srv638586915=6, srv1197719738=0, srv649224595=7, srv2082504663=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,125 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,126 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table30
2023-07-17 21:53:14,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1299794214=1, srv767736595=8, srv2029665747=3, srv926903657=9, srv1893596182=2, srv2064867563=4, srv638586915=6, srv1197719738=0, srv649224595=7, srv2082504663=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,126 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table30) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,126 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1299794214=1, srv767736595=8, srv2029665747=3, srv926903657=9, srv1893596182=2, srv2064867563=4, srv638586915=6, srv1197719738=0, srv649224595=7, srv2082504663=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,126 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table9) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,127 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table31
2023-07-17 21:53:14,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1299794214=1, srv767736595=8, srv2029665747=3, srv926903657=9, srv1893596182=2, srv2064867563=4, srv638586915=6, srv1197719738=0, srv649224595=7, srv2082504663=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,127 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table31) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,127 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1299794214=1, srv767736595=8, srv2029665747=3, srv926903657=9, srv1893596182=2, srv2064867563=4, srv638586915=6, srv1197719738=0, srv649224595=7, srv2082504663=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,128 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table8) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,128 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table32
2023-07-17 21:53:14,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1299794214=1, srv767736595=8, srv2029665747=3, srv926903657=9, srv1893596182=2, srv2064867563=4, srv638586915=6, srv1197719738=0, srv649224595=7, srv2082504663=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,128 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table32) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,128 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1299794214=1, srv767736595=8, srv2029665747=3, srv926903657=9, srv1893596182=2, srv2064867563=4, srv638586915=6, srv1197719738=0, srv649224595=7, srv2082504663=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,129 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,129 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table33
2023-07-17 21:53:14,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1299794214=1, srv767736595=8, srv2029665747=3, srv926903657=9, srv1893596182=2, srv2064867563=4, srv638586915=6, srv1197719738=0, srv649224595=7, srv2082504663=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,129 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table33) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,129 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1299794214=1, srv767736595=8, srv2029665747=3, srv926903657=9, srv1893596182=2, srv2064867563=4, srv638586915=6, srv1197719738=0, srv649224595=7, srv2082504663=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,130 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,130 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table34
2023-07-17 21:53:14,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1299794214=1, srv767736595=8, srv2029665747=3, srv926903657=9, srv1893596182=2, srv2064867563=4, srv638586915=6, srv1197719738=0, srv649224595=7, srv2082504663=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,130 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table34) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,131 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table24
2023-07-17 21:53:14,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1299794214=1, srv767736595=8, srv2029665747=3, srv926903657=9, srv1893596182=2, srv2064867563=4, srv638586915=6, srv1197719738=0, srv649224595=7, srv2082504663=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,131 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table24) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,131 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table25
2023-07-17 21:53:14,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1299794214=1, srv767736595=8, srv2029665747=3, srv926903657=9, srv1893596182=2, srv2064867563=4, srv638586915=6, srv1197719738=0, srv649224595=7, srv2082504663=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,132 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table25) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,132 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table26
2023-07-17 21:53:14,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1299794214=1, srv767736595=8, srv2029665747=3, srv926903657=9, srv1893596182=2, srv2064867563=4, srv638586915=6, srv1197719738=0, srv649224595=7, srv2082504663=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,132 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table26) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,132 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table27
2023-07-17 21:53:14,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1299794214=1, srv767736595=8, srv2029665747=3, srv926903657=9, srv1893596182=2, srv2064867563=4, srv638586915=6, srv1197719738=0, srv649224595=7, srv2082504663=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,133 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table27) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,133 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table28
2023-07-17 21:53:14,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1299794214=1, srv767736595=8, srv2029665747=3, srv926903657=9, srv1893596182=2, srv2064867563=4, srv638586915=6, srv1197719738=0, srv649224595=7, srv2082504663=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,133 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table28) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,133 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table29
2023-07-17 21:53:14,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1299794214=1, srv767736595=8, srv2029665747=3, srv926903657=9, srv1893596182=2, srv2064867563=4, srv638586915=6, srv1197719738=0, srv649224595=7, srv2082504663=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,134 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table29) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,134 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table20
2023-07-17 21:53:14,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1299794214=1, srv767736595=8, srv2029665747=3, srv926903657=9, srv1893596182=2, srv2064867563=4, srv638586915=6, srv1197719738=0, srv649224595=7, srv2082504663=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,134 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table20) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,134 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table21
2023-07-17 21:53:14,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1299794214=1, srv767736595=8, srv2029665747=3, srv926903657=9, srv1893596182=2, srv2064867563=4, srv638586915=6, srv1197719738=0, srv649224595=7, srv2082504663=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,135 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table21) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,135 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table22
2023-07-17 21:53:14,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1299794214=1, srv767736595=8, srv2029665747=3, srv926903657=9, srv1893596182=2, srv2064867563=4, srv638586915=6, srv1197719738=0, srv649224595=7, srv2082504663=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,135 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table22) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,135 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table23
2023-07-17 21:53:14,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1299794214=1, srv767736595=8, srv2029665747=3, srv926903657=9, srv1893596182=2, srv2064867563=4, srv638586915=6, srv1197719738=0, srv649224595=7, srv2082504663=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,136 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table23) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,136 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table13
2023-07-17 21:53:14,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1430073868=4, srv436374957=8, srv1622062790=6, srv1438984195=5, srv1054266415=0, srv850030307=9, srv1196056164=1, srv1346709258=3, srv1328724593=2, srv1659192628=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,137 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table13) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,137 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table14
2023-07-17 21:53:14,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1430073868=4, srv436374957=8, srv1622062790=6, srv1438984195=5, srv1054266415=0, srv850030307=9, srv1196056164=1, srv1346709258=3, srv1328724593=2, srv1659192628=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,137 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table14) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,137 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table15
2023-07-17 21:53:14,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1430073868=4, srv436374957=8, srv1622062790=6, srv1438984195=5, srv1054266415=0, srv850030307=9, srv1196056164=1, srv1346709258=3, srv1328724593=2, srv1659192628=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,138 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table15) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,138 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table16
2023-07-17 21:53:14,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1430073868=4, srv436374957=8, srv1622062790=6, srv1438984195=5, srv1054266415=0, srv850030307=9, srv1196056164=1, srv1346709258=3, srv1328724593=2, srv1659192628=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,138 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table16) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,138 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table17
2023-07-17 21:53:14,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1430073868=4, srv436374957=8, srv1622062790=6, srv1438984195=5, srv1054266415=0, srv850030307=9, srv1196056164=1, srv1346709258=3, srv1328724593=2, srv1659192628=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,139 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table17) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,139 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table18
2023-07-17 21:53:14,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1430073868=4, srv436374957=8, srv1622062790=6, srv1438984195=5, srv1054266415=0, srv850030307=9, srv1196056164=1, srv1346709258=3, srv1328724593=2, srv1659192628=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,139 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table18) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,139 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table19
2023-07-17 21:53:14,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1430073868=4, srv436374957=8, srv1622062790=6, srv1438984195=5, srv1054266415=0, srv850030307=9, srv1196056164=1, srv1346709258=3, srv1328724593=2, srv1659192628=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,140 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table19) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,140 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table50
2023-07-17 21:53:14,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1430073868=4, srv436374957=8, srv1622062790=6, srv1438984195=5, srv1054266415=0, srv850030307=9, srv1196056164=1, srv1346709258=3, srv1328724593=2, srv1659192628=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,141 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table50) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,141 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table51
2023-07-17 21:53:14,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1430073868=4, srv436374957=8, srv1622062790=6, srv1438984195=5, srv1054266415=0, srv850030307=9, srv1196056164=1, srv1346709258=3, srv1328724593=2, srv1659192628=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,141 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table51) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,141 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table52
2023-07-17 21:53:14,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1430073868=4, srv436374957=8, srv1622062790=6, srv1438984195=5, srv1054266415=0, srv850030307=9, srv1196056164=1, srv1346709258=3, srv1328724593=2, srv1659192628=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,142 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table52) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,142 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table53
2023-07-17 21:53:14,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1430073868=4, srv436374957=8, srv1622062790=6, srv1438984195=5, srv1054266415=0, srv850030307=9, srv1196056164=1, srv1346709258=3, srv1328724593=2, srv1659192628=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,142 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table53) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,143 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table10
2023-07-17 21:53:14,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1430073868=4, srv436374957=8, srv1622062790=6, srv1438984195=5, srv1054266415=0, srv850030307=9, srv1196056164=1, srv1346709258=3, srv1328724593=2, srv1659192628=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,143 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table10) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,143 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table54
2023-07-17 21:53:14,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1430073868=4, srv436374957=8, srv1622062790=6, srv1438984195=5, srv1054266415=0, srv850030307=9, srv1196056164=1, srv1346709258=3, srv1328724593=2, srv1659192628=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,144 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table54) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,144 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table11
2023-07-17 21:53:14,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1430073868=4, srv436374957=8, srv1622062790=6, srv1438984195=5, srv1054266415=0, srv850030307=9, srv1196056164=1, srv1346709258=3, srv1328724593=2, srv1659192628=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,144 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table11) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,144 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table55
2023-07-17 21:53:14,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1430073868=4, srv436374957=8, srv1622062790=6, srv1438984195=5, srv1054266415=0, srv850030307=9, srv1196056164=1, srv1346709258=3, srv1328724593=2, srv1659192628=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,145 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table55) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,145 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table12
2023-07-17 21:53:14,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1430073868=4, srv436374957=8, srv1622062790=6, srv1438984195=5, srv1054266415=0, srv850030307=9, srv1196056164=1, srv1346709258=3, srv1328724593=2, srv1659192628=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,145 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table12) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,145 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table46
2023-07-17 21:53:14,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1430073868=4, srv436374957=8, srv1622062790=6, srv1438984195=5, srv1054266415=0, srv850030307=9, srv1196056164=1, srv1346709258=3, srv1328724593=2, srv1659192628=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,146 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table46) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,146 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table47
2023-07-17 21:53:14,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1430073868=4, srv436374957=8, srv1622062790=6, srv1438984195=5, srv1054266415=0, srv850030307=9, srv1196056164=1, srv1346709258=3, srv1328724593=2, srv1659192628=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,146 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table47) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,146 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table48
2023-07-17 21:53:14,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1430073868=4, srv436374957=8, srv1622062790=6, srv1438984195=5, srv1054266415=0, srv850030307=9, srv1196056164=1, srv1346709258=3, srv1328724593=2, srv1659192628=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,147 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table48) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,147 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table49
2023-07-17 21:53:14,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1430073868=4, srv436374957=8, srv1622062790=6, srv1438984195=5, srv1054266415=0, srv850030307=9, srv1196056164=1, srv1346709258=3, srv1328724593=2, srv1659192628=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,147 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table49) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,147 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table40
2023-07-17 21:53:14,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1430073868=4, srv436374957=8, srv1622062790=6, srv1438984195=5, srv1054266415=0, srv850030307=9, srv1196056164=1, srv1346709258=3, srv1328724593=2, srv1659192628=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,148 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table40) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,148 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table41
2023-07-17 21:53:14,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1430073868=4, srv436374957=8, srv1622062790=6, srv1438984195=5, srv1054266415=0, srv850030307=9, srv1196056164=1, srv1346709258=3, srv1328724593=2, srv1659192628=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,148 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table41) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,148 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table42
2023-07-17 21:53:14,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1430073868=4, srv436374957=8, srv1622062790=6, srv1438984195=5, srv1054266415=0, srv850030307=9, srv1196056164=1, srv1346709258=3, srv1328724593=2, srv1659192628=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,149 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table42) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,149 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table43
2023-07-17 21:53:14,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1430073868=4, srv436374957=8, srv1622062790=6, srv1438984195=5, srv1054266415=0, srv850030307=9, srv1196056164=1, srv1346709258=3, srv1328724593=2, srv1659192628=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,150 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table43) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,150 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table44
2023-07-17 21:53:14,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1430073868=4, srv436374957=8, srv1622062790=6, srv1438984195=5, srv1054266415=0, srv850030307=9, srv1196056164=1, srv1346709258=3, srv1328724593=2, srv1659192628=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,150 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table44) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,150 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table45
2023-07-17 21:53:14,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1430073868=4, srv436374957=8, srv1622062790=6, srv1438984195=5, srv1054266415=0, srv850030307=9, srv1196056164=1, srv1346709258=3, srv1328724593=2, srv1659192628=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,151 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table45) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,151 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table35
2023-07-17 21:53:14,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1430073868=4, srv436374957=8, srv1622062790=6, srv1438984195=5, srv1054266415=0, srv850030307=9, srv1196056164=1, srv1346709258=3, srv1328724593=2, srv1659192628=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,151 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table35) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,151 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table36
2023-07-17 21:53:14,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1430073868=4, srv436374957=8, srv1622062790=6, srv1438984195=5, srv1054266415=0, srv850030307=9, srv1196056164=1, srv1346709258=3, srv1328724593=2, srv1659192628=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,152 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table36) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,152 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table37
2023-07-17 21:53:14,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1430073868=4, srv436374957=8, srv1622062790=6, srv1438984195=5, srv1054266415=0, srv850030307=9, srv1196056164=1, srv1346709258=3, srv1328724593=2, srv1659192628=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,152 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table37) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,152 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table38
2023-07-17 21:53:14,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1430073868=4, srv436374957=8, srv1622062790=6, srv1438984195=5, srv1054266415=0, srv850030307=9, srv1196056164=1, srv1346709258=3, srv1328724593=2, srv1659192628=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,153 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table38) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,153 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table39
2023-07-17 21:53:14,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1430073868=4, srv436374957=8, srv1622062790=6, srv1438984195=5, srv1054266415=0, srv850030307=9, srv1196056164=1, srv1346709258=3, srv1328724593=2, srv1659192628=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,153 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table39) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,153 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1430073868=4, srv436374957=8, srv1622062790=6, srv1438984195=5, srv1054266415=0, srv850030307=9, srv1196056164=1, srv1346709258=3, srv1328724593=2, srv1659192628=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,154 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,154 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1430073868=4, srv436374957=8, srv1622062790=6, srv1438984195=5, srv1054266415=0, srv850030307=9, srv1196056164=1, srv1346709258=3, srv1328724593=2, srv1659192628=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,154 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,154 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1430073868=4, srv436374957=8, srv1622062790=6, srv1438984195=5, srv1054266415=0, srv850030307=9, srv1196056164=1, srv1346709258=3, srv1328724593=2, srv1659192628=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,155 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,155 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1430073868=4, srv436374957=8, srv1622062790=6, srv1438984195=5, srv1054266415=0, srv850030307=9, srv1196056164=1, srv1346709258=3, srv1328724593=2, srv1659192628=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,155 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,155 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1430073868=4, srv436374957=8, srv1622062790=6, srv1438984195=5, srv1054266415=0, srv850030307=9, srv1196056164=1, srv1346709258=3, srv1328724593=2, srv1659192628=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,156 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,156 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1430073868=4, srv436374957=8, srv1622062790=6, srv1438984195=5, srv1054266415=0, srv850030307=9, srv1196056164=1, srv1346709258=3, srv1328724593=2, srv1659192628=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,156 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,156 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table30
2023-07-17 21:53:14,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1430073868=4, srv436374957=8, srv1622062790=6, srv1438984195=5, srv1054266415=0, srv850030307=9, srv1196056164=1, srv1346709258=3, srv1328724593=2, srv1659192628=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,157 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table30) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,157 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1430073868=4, srv436374957=8, srv1622062790=6, srv1438984195=5, srv1054266415=0, srv850030307=9, srv1196056164=1, srv1346709258=3, srv1328724593=2, srv1659192628=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,157 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table9) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,157 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table31
2023-07-17 21:53:14,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1430073868=4, srv436374957=8, srv1622062790=6, srv1438984195=5, srv1054266415=0, srv850030307=9, srv1196056164=1, srv1346709258=3, srv1328724593=2, srv1659192628=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,158 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table31) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,158 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1430073868=4, srv436374957=8, srv1622062790=6, srv1438984195=5, srv1054266415=0, srv850030307=9, srv1196056164=1, srv1346709258=3, srv1328724593=2, srv1659192628=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,159 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table8) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,159 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table32
2023-07-17 21:53:14,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1430073868=4, srv436374957=8, srv1622062790=6, srv1438984195=5, srv1054266415=0, srv850030307=9, srv1196056164=1, srv1346709258=3, srv1328724593=2, srv1659192628=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,159 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table32) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,159 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1430073868=4, srv436374957=8, srv1622062790=6, srv1438984195=5, srv1054266415=0, srv850030307=9, srv1196056164=1, srv1346709258=3, srv1328724593=2, srv1659192628=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,160 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,160 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table33
2023-07-17 21:53:14,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1430073868=4, srv436374957=8, srv1622062790=6, srv1438984195=5, srv1054266415=0, srv850030307=9, srv1196056164=1, srv1346709258=3, srv1328724593=2, srv1659192628=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,160 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table33) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,160 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1430073868=4, srv436374957=8, srv1622062790=6, srv1438984195=5, srv1054266415=0, srv850030307=9, srv1196056164=1, srv1346709258=3, srv1328724593=2, srv1659192628=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,161 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,161 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table34
2023-07-17 21:53:14,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1430073868=4, srv436374957=8, srv1622062790=6, srv1438984195=5, srv1054266415=0, srv850030307=9, srv1196056164=1, srv1346709258=3, srv1328724593=2, srv1659192628=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,161 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table34) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,161 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table24
2023-07-17 21:53:14,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1430073868=4, srv436374957=8, srv1622062790=6, srv1438984195=5, srv1054266415=0, srv850030307=9, srv1196056164=1, srv1346709258=3, srv1328724593=2, srv1659192628=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,162 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table24) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,162 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table25
2023-07-17 21:53:14,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1430073868=4, srv436374957=8, srv1622062790=6, srv1438984195=5, srv1054266415=0, srv850030307=9, srv1196056164=1, srv1346709258=3, srv1328724593=2, srv1659192628=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,162 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table25) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,163 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table26
2023-07-17 21:53:14,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1430073868=4, srv436374957=8, srv1622062790=6, srv1438984195=5, srv1054266415=0, srv850030307=9, srv1196056164=1, srv1346709258=3, srv1328724593=2, srv1659192628=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,163 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table26) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,163 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table27
2023-07-17 21:53:14,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1430073868=4, srv436374957=8, srv1622062790=6, srv1438984195=5, srv1054266415=0, srv850030307=9, srv1196056164=1, srv1346709258=3, srv1328724593=2, srv1659192628=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,164 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table27) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,164 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table28
2023-07-17 21:53:14,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1430073868=4, srv436374957=8, srv1622062790=6, srv1438984195=5, srv1054266415=0, srv850030307=9, srv1196056164=1, srv1346709258=3, srv1328724593=2, srv1659192628=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,164 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table28) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,164 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table29
2023-07-17 21:53:14,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1430073868=4, srv436374957=8, srv1622062790=6, srv1438984195=5, srv1054266415=0, srv850030307=9, srv1196056164=1, srv1346709258=3, srv1328724593=2, srv1659192628=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,165 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table29) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,165 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table20
2023-07-17 21:53:14,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1430073868=4, srv436374957=8, srv1622062790=6, srv1438984195=5, srv1054266415=0, srv850030307=9, srv1196056164=1, srv1346709258=3, srv1328724593=2, srv1659192628=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,165 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table20) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,165 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table21
2023-07-17 21:53:14,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1430073868=4, srv436374957=8, srv1622062790=6, srv1438984195=5, srv1054266415=0, srv850030307=9, srv1196056164=1, srv1346709258=3, srv1328724593=2, srv1659192628=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,166 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table21) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,166 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table22
2023-07-17 21:53:14,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1430073868=4, srv436374957=8, srv1622062790=6, srv1438984195=5, srv1054266415=0, srv850030307=9, srv1196056164=1, srv1346709258=3, srv1328724593=2, srv1659192628=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,166 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table22) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,166 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table23
2023-07-17 21:53:14,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1430073868=4, srv436374957=8, srv1622062790=6, srv1438984195=5, srv1054266415=0, srv850030307=9, srv1196056164=1, srv1346709258=3, srv1328724593=2, srv1659192628=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,167 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table23) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,167 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table13
2023-07-17 21:53:14,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1082013453=0, srv153820092=5, srv1083550322=1, srv1273478174=3, srv1453721818=4, srv697905052=9, srv417694372=7, srv1244376328=2, srv695564719=8, srv211145371=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,167 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table13) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,167 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table14
2023-07-17 21:53:14,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1082013453=0, srv153820092=5, srv1083550322=1, srv1273478174=3, srv1453721818=4, srv697905052=9, srv417694372=7, srv1244376328=2, srv695564719=8, srv211145371=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,168 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table14) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,168 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table15
2023-07-17 21:53:14,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1082013453=0, srv153820092=5, srv1083550322=1, srv1273478174=3, srv1453721818=4, srv697905052=9, srv417694372=7, srv1244376328=2, srv695564719=8, srv211145371=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,169 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table15) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,169 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1082013453=0, srv153820092=5, srv1083550322=1, srv1273478174=3, srv1453721818=4, srv697905052=9, srv417694372=7, srv1244376328=2, srv695564719=8, srv211145371=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,169 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,169 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1082013453=0, srv153820092=5, srv1083550322=1, srv1273478174=3, srv1453721818=4, srv697905052=9, srv417694372=7, srv1244376328=2, srv695564719=8, srv211145371=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,170 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,170 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1082013453=0, srv153820092=5, srv1083550322=1, srv1273478174=3, srv1453721818=4, srv697905052=9, srv417694372=7, srv1244376328=2, srv695564719=8, srv211145371=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,170 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,170 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1082013453=0, srv153820092=5, srv1083550322=1, srv1273478174=3, srv1453721818=4, srv697905052=9, srv417694372=7, srv1244376328=2, srv695564719=8, srv211145371=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,171 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,171 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1082013453=0, srv153820092=5, srv1083550322=1, srv1273478174=3, srv1453721818=4, srv697905052=9, srv417694372=7, srv1244376328=2, srv695564719=8, srv211145371=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,171 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,171 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1082013453=0, srv153820092=5, srv1083550322=1, srv1273478174=3, srv1453721818=4, srv697905052=9, srv417694372=7, srv1244376328=2, srv695564719=8, srv211145371=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,172 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,172 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1082013453=0, srv153820092=5, srv1083550322=1, srv1273478174=3, srv1453721818=4, srv697905052=9, srv417694372=7, srv1244376328=2, srv695564719=8, srv211145371=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,172 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table9) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,172 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1082013453=0, srv153820092=5, srv1083550322=1, srv1273478174=3, srv1453721818=4, srv697905052=9, srv417694372=7, srv1244376328=2, srv695564719=8, srv211145371=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,173 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table8) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,173 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table10
2023-07-17 21:53:14,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1082013453=0, srv153820092=5, srv1083550322=1, srv1273478174=3, srv1453721818=4, srv697905052=9, srv417694372=7, srv1244376328=2, srv695564719=8, srv211145371=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,173 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table10) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,173 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1082013453=0, srv153820092=5, srv1083550322=1, srv1273478174=3, srv1453721818=4, srv697905052=9, srv417694372=7, srv1244376328=2, srv695564719=8, srv211145371=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,174 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,174 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table11
2023-07-17 21:53:14,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1082013453=0, srv153820092=5, srv1083550322=1, srv1273478174=3, srv1453721818=4, srv697905052=9, srv417694372=7, srv1244376328=2, srv695564719=8, srv211145371=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,174 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table11) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,174 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1082013453=0, srv153820092=5, srv1083550322=1, srv1273478174=3, srv1453721818=4, srv697905052=9, srv417694372=7, srv1244376328=2, srv695564719=8, srv211145371=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,175 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,175 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table12
2023-07-17 21:53:14,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1082013453=0, srv153820092=5, srv1083550322=1, srv1273478174=3, srv1453721818=4, srv697905052=9, srv417694372=7, srv1244376328=2, srv695564719=8, srv211145371=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,175 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table12) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,176 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv921160131=9, srv782595235=7, srv1971713651=3, srv1569312294=1, srv71367782=6, srv666805450=5, srv2014078545=4, srv1451104407=0, srv1586985956=2, srv808405602=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,176 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,176 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv921160131=9, srv782595235=7, srv1971713651=3, srv1569312294=1, srv71367782=6, srv666805450=5, srv2014078545=4, srv1451104407=0, srv1586985956=2, srv808405602=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,177 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,177 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv921160131=9, srv782595235=7, srv1971713651=3, srv1569312294=1, srv71367782=6, srv666805450=5, srv2014078545=4, srv1451104407=0, srv1586985956=2, srv808405602=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,177 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,177 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv921160131=9, srv782595235=7, srv1971713651=3, srv1569312294=1, srv71367782=6, srv666805450=5, srv2014078545=4, srv1451104407=0, srv1586985956=2, srv808405602=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,178 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,178 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv921160131=9, srv782595235=7, srv1971713651=3, srv1569312294=1, srv71367782=6, srv666805450=5, srv2014078545=4, srv1451104407=0, srv1586985956=2, srv808405602=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,179 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,179 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv921160131=9, srv782595235=7, srv1971713651=3, srv1569312294=1, srv71367782=6, srv666805450=5, srv2014078545=4, srv1451104407=0, srv1586985956=2, srv808405602=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,179 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,179 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv921160131=9, srv782595235=7, srv1971713651=3, srv1569312294=1, srv71367782=6, srv666805450=5, srv2014078545=4, srv1451104407=0, srv1586985956=2, srv808405602=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,180 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,180 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv921160131=9, srv782595235=7, srv1971713651=3, srv1569312294=1, srv71367782=6, srv666805450=5, srv2014078545=4, srv1451104407=0, srv1586985956=2, srv808405602=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,180 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,180 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1941925977=4, srv481315936=7, srv1071470184=0, srv47375858=6, srv624900275=9, srv1700591517=2, srv2117511461=5, srv1821576675=3, srv610261569=8, srv1250310414=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,181 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,181 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1941925977=4, srv481315936=7, srv1071470184=0, srv47375858=6, srv624900275=9, srv1700591517=2, srv2117511461=5, srv1821576675=3, srv610261569=8, srv1250310414=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,181 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,182 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1941925977=4, srv481315936=7, srv1071470184=0, srv47375858=6, srv624900275=9, srv1700591517=2, srv2117511461=5, srv1821576675=3, srv610261569=8, srv1250310414=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,182 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,182 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1941925977=4, srv481315936=7, srv1071470184=0, srv47375858=6, srv624900275=9, srv1700591517=2, srv2117511461=5, srv1821576675=3, srv610261569=8, srv1250310414=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,183 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,183 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1941925977=4, srv481315936=7, srv1071470184=0, srv47375858=6, srv624900275=9, srv1700591517=2, srv2117511461=5, srv1821576675=3, srv610261569=8, srv1250310414=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,183 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,183 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1941925977=4, srv481315936=7, srv1071470184=0, srv47375858=6, srv624900275=9, srv1700591517=2, srv2117511461=5, srv1821576675=3, srv610261569=8, srv1250310414=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,184 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,184 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1941925977=4, srv481315936=7, srv1071470184=0, srv47375858=6, srv624900275=9, srv1700591517=2, srv2117511461=5, srv1821576675=3, srv610261569=8, srv1250310414=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,184 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table8) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,184 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1941925977=4, srv481315936=7, srv1071470184=0, srv47375858=6, srv624900275=9, srv1700591517=2, srv2117511461=5, srv1821576675=3, srv610261569=8, srv1250310414=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,185 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,185 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1941925977=4, srv481315936=7, srv1071470184=0, srv47375858=6, srv624900275=9, srv1700591517=2, srv2117511461=5, srv1821576675=3, srv610261569=8, srv1250310414=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,185 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,185 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv669814267=9, srv1496932876=3, srv2047773300=6, srv1061489627=0, srv325549674=7, srv1645082767=5, srv1593759402=4, srv1488113614=2, srv457910311=8, srv1327443197=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,186 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,186 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv669814267=9, srv1496932876=3, srv2047773300=6, srv1061489627=0, srv325549674=7, srv1645082767=5, srv1593759402=4, srv1488113614=2, srv457910311=8, srv1327443197=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,187 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,187 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv669814267=9, srv1496932876=3, srv2047773300=6, srv1061489627=0, srv325549674=7, srv1645082767=5, srv1593759402=4, srv1488113614=2, srv457910311=8, srv1327443197=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,187 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,187 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv669814267=9, srv1496932876=3, srv2047773300=6, srv1061489627=0, srv325549674=7, srv1645082767=5, srv1593759402=4, srv1488113614=2, srv457910311=8, srv1327443197=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,188 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,188 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv669814267=9, srv1496932876=3, srv2047773300=6, srv1061489627=0, srv325549674=7, srv1645082767=5, srv1593759402=4, srv1488113614=2, srv457910311=8, srv1327443197=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,189 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,189 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv669814267=9, srv1496932876=3, srv2047773300=6, srv1061489627=0, srv325549674=7, srv1645082767=5, srv1593759402=4, srv1488113614=2, srv457910311=8, srv1327443197=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,189 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,189 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv669814267=9, srv1496932876=3, srv2047773300=6, srv1061489627=0, srv325549674=7, srv1645082767=5, srv1593759402=4, srv1488113614=2, srv457910311=8, srv1327443197=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,190 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table9) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,190 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv669814267=9, srv1496932876=3, srv2047773300=6, srv1061489627=0, srv325549674=7, srv1645082767=5, srv1593759402=4, srv1488113614=2, srv457910311=8, srv1327443197=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,190 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table8) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,190 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv669814267=9, srv1496932876=3, srv2047773300=6, srv1061489627=0, srv325549674=7, srv1645082767=5, srv1593759402=4, srv1488113614=2, srv457910311=8, srv1327443197=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,191 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,191 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv669814267=9, srv1496932876=3, srv2047773300=6, srv1061489627=0, srv325549674=7, srv1645082767=5, srv1593759402=4, srv1488113614=2, srv457910311=8, srv1327443197=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,191 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,192 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table13
2023-07-17 21:53:14,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,193 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table13) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,193 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table14
2023-07-17 21:53:14,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,193 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table14) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,193 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table120
2023-07-17 21:53:14,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,194 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table120) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,194 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table15
2023-07-17 21:53:14,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,194 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table15) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,194 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table121
2023-07-17 21:53:14,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,195 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table121) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,195 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table16
2023-07-17 21:53:14,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,195 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table16) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,195 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table122
2023-07-17 21:53:14,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,196 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table122) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,196 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table17
2023-07-17 21:53:14,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,196 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table17) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,196 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table18
2023-07-17 21:53:14,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,197 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table18) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,197 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table19
2023-07-17 21:53:14,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,197 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table19) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,197 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table90
2023-07-17 21:53:14,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,198 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table90) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,198 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table91
2023-07-17 21:53:14,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,199 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table91) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,199 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table92
2023-07-17 21:53:14,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,199 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table92) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,200 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table93
2023-07-17 21:53:14,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,200 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table93) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,200 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table94
2023-07-17 21:53:14,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,201 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table94) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,201 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table95
2023-07-17 21:53:14,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,201 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table95) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,201 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table96
2023-07-17 21:53:14,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,202 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table96) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,202 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table97
2023-07-17 21:53:14,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,202 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table97) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,202 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table10
2023-07-17 21:53:14,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,203 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table10) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,203 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table98
2023-07-17 21:53:14,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,203 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table98) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,203 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table11
2023-07-17 21:53:14,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,204 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table11) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,204 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table99
2023-07-17 21:53:14,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,204 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table99) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,204 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table12
2023-07-17 21:53:14,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,205 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table12) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,205 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table110
2023-07-17 21:53:14,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,205 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table110) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,205 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table111
2023-07-17 21:53:14,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,206 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table111) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,206 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table112
2023-07-17 21:53:14,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,206 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table112) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,206 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table113
2023-07-17 21:53:14,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,207 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table113) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,207 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table114
2023-07-17 21:53:14,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,207 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table114) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,207 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table115
2023-07-17 21:53:14,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,208 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table115) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,208 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table116
2023-07-17 21:53:14,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,209 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table116) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,209 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table117
2023-07-17 21:53:14,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,209 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table117) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,209 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table118
2023-07-17 21:53:14,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,210 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table118) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,210 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table119
2023-07-17 21:53:14,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,210 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table119) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,210 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table80
2023-07-17 21:53:14,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,211 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table80) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,211 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table81
2023-07-17 21:53:14,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,211 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table81) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,211 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table82
2023-07-17 21:53:14,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,212 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table82) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,212 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table83
2023-07-17 21:53:14,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,212 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table83) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,212 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table84
2023-07-17 21:53:14,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,213 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table84) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,213 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table85
2023-07-17 21:53:14,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,213 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table85) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,213 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table86
2023-07-17 21:53:14,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,214 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table86) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,214 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table87
2023-07-17 21:53:14,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,214 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table87) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,214 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table88
2023-07-17 21:53:14,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,215 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table88) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,215 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table89
2023-07-17 21:53:14,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,215 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table89) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,215 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table79
2023-07-17 21:53:14,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,216 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table79) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,216 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,216 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,216 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,217 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,217 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,218 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,218 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,218 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,218 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,219 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,219 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,219 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,220 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table70
2023-07-17 21:53:14,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,220 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table70) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,220 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table71
2023-07-17 21:53:14,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,221 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table71) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,221 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table72
2023-07-17 21:53:14,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,221 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table72) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,221 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table73
2023-07-17 21:53:14,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,222 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table73) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,222 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table74
2023-07-17 21:53:14,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,222 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table74) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,222 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,223 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table9) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,223 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table75
2023-07-17 21:53:14,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,223 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table75) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,223 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,224 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table8) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,224 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table76
2023-07-17 21:53:14,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,224 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table76) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,224 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,225 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,225 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table77
2023-07-17 21:53:14,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,225 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table77) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,225 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,226 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,226 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table78
2023-07-17 21:53:14,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,226 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table78) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,226 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table68
2023-07-17 21:53:14,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,227 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table68) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,227 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table69
2023-07-17 21:53:14,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,228 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table69) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,228 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table60
2023-07-17 21:53:14,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,228 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table60) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,228 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table61
2023-07-17 21:53:14,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,229 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table61) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,229 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table62
2023-07-17 21:53:14,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,229 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table62) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,229 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table63
2023-07-17 21:53:14,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,230 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table63) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,230 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table64
2023-07-17 21:53:14,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,230 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table64) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,230 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table65
2023-07-17 21:53:14,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,231 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table65) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,231 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table66
2023-07-17 21:53:14,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,231 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table66) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,231 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table67
2023-07-17 21:53:14,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,232 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table67) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,232 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table57
2023-07-17 21:53:14,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,232 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table57) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,232 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table58
2023-07-17 21:53:14,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,233 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table58) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,233 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table59
2023-07-17 21:53:14,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,233 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table59) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,233 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table50
2023-07-17 21:53:14,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,234 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table50) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,234 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table51
2023-07-17 21:53:14,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,234 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table51) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,234 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table52
2023-07-17 21:53:14,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,235 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table52) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,235 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table53
2023-07-17 21:53:14,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,235 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table53) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,236 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table54
2023-07-17 21:53:14,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,236 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table54) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,236 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table55
2023-07-17 21:53:14,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,237 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table55) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,237 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table56
2023-07-17 21:53:14,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,237 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table56) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,237 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table46
2023-07-17 21:53:14,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,238 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table46) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,238 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table47
2023-07-17 21:53:14,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,238 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table47) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,238 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table48
2023-07-17 21:53:14,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,239 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table48) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,239 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table49
2023-07-17 21:53:14,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,239 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table49) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,239 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table40
2023-07-17 21:53:14,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,240 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table40) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,240 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table41
2023-07-17 21:53:14,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,240 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table41) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,240 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table42
2023-07-17 21:53:14,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,241 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table42) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,241 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table43
2023-07-17 21:53:14,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,241 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table43) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,242 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table44
2023-07-17 21:53:14,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,242 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table44) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,242 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table45
2023-07-17 21:53:14,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,243 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table45) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,243 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table35
2023-07-17 21:53:14,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,243 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table35) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,243 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table36
2023-07-17 21:53:14,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,244 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table36) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,244 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table37
2023-07-17 21:53:14,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,244 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table37) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,244 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table38
2023-07-17 21:53:14,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,245 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table38) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,245 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table100
2023-07-17 21:53:14,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,245 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table100) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,246 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table39
2023-07-17 21:53:14,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,246 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table39) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,246 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table101
2023-07-17 21:53:14,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,247 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table101) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,247 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table102
2023-07-17 21:53:14,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,247 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table102) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,247 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table103
2023-07-17 21:53:14,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,248 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table103) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,248 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table104
2023-07-17 21:53:14,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,248 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table104) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,248 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table105
2023-07-17 21:53:14,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,249 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table105) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,249 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table106
2023-07-17 21:53:14,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,249 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table106) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,249 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table107
2023-07-17 21:53:14,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,250 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table107) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,250 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table108
2023-07-17 21:53:14,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,250 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table108) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,250 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table109
2023-07-17 21:53:14,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,251 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table109) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,251 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table30
2023-07-17 21:53:14,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,251 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table30) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,251 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table31
2023-07-17 21:53:14,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,252 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table31) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,252 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table32
2023-07-17 21:53:14,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,252 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table32) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,252 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table33
2023-07-17 21:53:14,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,253 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table33) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,253 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table34
2023-07-17 21:53:14,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,253 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table34) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,253 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table24
2023-07-17 21:53:14,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,254 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table24) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,254 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table25
2023-07-17 21:53:14,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,254 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table25) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,255 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table26
2023-07-17 21:53:14,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,255 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table26) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,255 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table27
2023-07-17 21:53:14,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,256 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table27) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,256 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table28
2023-07-17 21:53:14,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,256 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table28) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,256 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table29
2023-07-17 21:53:14,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,257 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table29) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,257 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table20
2023-07-17 21:53:14,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,257 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table20) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,257 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table21
2023-07-17 21:53:14,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,258 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table21) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,258 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table22
2023-07-17 21:53:14,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,258 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table22) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,258 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table23
2023-07-17 21:53:14,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1467145558=1, srv1928260270=3, srv236531420=7, srv1810237336=2, srv441258381=8, srv900787129=9, srv2033041286=5, srv1951119205=4, srv1189552227=0, srv2069919940=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,259 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table23) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,260 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table13
2023-07-17 21:53:14,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,260 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table13) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,261 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table14
2023-07-17 21:53:14,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,261 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table14) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,261 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table120
2023-07-17 21:53:14,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,262 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table120) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,262 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table15
2023-07-17 21:53:14,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,262 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table15) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,262 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table121
2023-07-17 21:53:14,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,263 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table121) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,263 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table16
2023-07-17 21:53:14,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,263 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table16) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,263 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table122
2023-07-17 21:53:14,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,264 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table122) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,264 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table17
2023-07-17 21:53:14,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,264 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table17) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,264 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table123
2023-07-17 21:53:14,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,265 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table123) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,265 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table18
2023-07-17 21:53:14,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,266 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table18) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,266 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table124
2023-07-17 21:53:14,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,266 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table124) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,266 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table19
2023-07-17 21:53:14,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,267 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table19) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,267 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table125
2023-07-17 21:53:14,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,267 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table125) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,267 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table126
2023-07-17 21:53:14,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,268 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table126) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,268 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table127
2023-07-17 21:53:14,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,268 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table127) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,268 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table128
2023-07-17 21:53:14,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,269 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table128) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,269 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table129
2023-07-17 21:53:14,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,269 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table129) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,269 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table90
2023-07-17 21:53:14,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,270 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table90) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,270 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table91
2023-07-17 21:53:14,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,270 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table91) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,270 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table92
2023-07-17 21:53:14,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,271 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table92) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,271 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table93
2023-07-17 21:53:14,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,271 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table93) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,271 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table94
2023-07-17 21:53:14,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,272 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table94) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,272 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table95
2023-07-17 21:53:14,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,272 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table95) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,272 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table96
2023-07-17 21:53:14,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,273 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table96) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,273 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table97
2023-07-17 21:53:14,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,273 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table97) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,273 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table10
2023-07-17 21:53:14,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,274 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table10) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,274 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table98
2023-07-17 21:53:14,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,275 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table98) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,275 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table11
2023-07-17 21:53:14,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,275 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table11) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,275 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table99
2023-07-17 21:53:14,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,276 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table99) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,276 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table12
2023-07-17 21:53:14,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,276 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table12) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,277 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table110
2023-07-17 21:53:14,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,277 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table110) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,277 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table111
2023-07-17 21:53:14,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,278 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table111) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,278 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table112
2023-07-17 21:53:14,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,278 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table112) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,278 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table113
2023-07-17 21:53:14,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,279 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table113) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,279 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table114
2023-07-17 21:53:14,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,279 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table114) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,279 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table115
2023-07-17 21:53:14,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,280 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table115) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,280 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table116
2023-07-17 21:53:14,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,280 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table116) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,280 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table117
2023-07-17 21:53:14,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,281 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table117) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,281 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table118
2023-07-17 21:53:14,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,281 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table118) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,281 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table119
2023-07-17 21:53:14,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,282 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table119) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,282 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table80
2023-07-17 21:53:14,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,282 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table80) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,282 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table81
2023-07-17 21:53:14,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,283 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table81) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,283 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table82
2023-07-17 21:53:14,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,283 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table82) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,283 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table83
2023-07-17 21:53:14,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,284 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table83) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,284 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table84
2023-07-17 21:53:14,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,285 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table84) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,285 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table85
2023-07-17 21:53:14,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,285 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table85) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,285 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table86
2023-07-17 21:53:14,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,286 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table86) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,286 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table87
2023-07-17 21:53:14,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,286 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table87) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,286 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table88
2023-07-17 21:53:14,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,287 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table88) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,287 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table89
2023-07-17 21:53:14,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,287 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table89) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,287 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table79
2023-07-17 21:53:14,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,288 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table79) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,288 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table141
2023-07-17 21:53:14,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,288 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table141) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,288 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table142
2023-07-17 21:53:14,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,289 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table142) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,289 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table143
2023-07-17 21:53:14,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,289 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table143) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,289 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table144
2023-07-17 21:53:14,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,290 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table144) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,290 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table145
2023-07-17 21:53:14,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,290 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table145) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,290 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table146
2023-07-17 21:53:14,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,291 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table146) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,291 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table147
2023-07-17 21:53:14,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,291 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table147) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,291 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table148
2023-07-17 21:53:14,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,292 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table148) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,292 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table149
2023-07-17 21:53:14,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,292 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table149) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,292 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,293 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,293 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,294 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,294 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,294 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,294 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,295 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,295 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,295 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,295 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,296 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,296 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table70
2023-07-17 21:53:14,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,296 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table70) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,296 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table71
2023-07-17 21:53:14,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,297 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table71) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,297 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table72
2023-07-17 21:53:14,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,297 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table72) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,297 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table73
2023-07-17 21:53:14,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,298 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table73) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,298 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table74
2023-07-17 21:53:14,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,298 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table74) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,298 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,299 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table9) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,299 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table75
2023-07-17 21:53:14,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,299 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table75) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,299 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,300 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table8) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,300 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table76
2023-07-17 21:53:14,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,300 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table76) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,300 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,301 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,301 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table77
2023-07-17 21:53:14,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,301 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table77) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,301 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table150
2023-07-17 21:53:14,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,302 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table150) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,302 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,303 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,303 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table78
2023-07-17 21:53:14,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,303 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table78) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,303 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table151
2023-07-17 21:53:14,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,304 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table151) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,304 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table68
2023-07-17 21:53:14,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,304 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table68) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,304 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table130
2023-07-17 21:53:14,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,305 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table130) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,305 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table69
2023-07-17 21:53:14,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,305 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table69) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,305 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table131
2023-07-17 21:53:14,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,306 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table131) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,306 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table132
2023-07-17 21:53:14,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,306 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table132) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,306 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table133
2023-07-17 21:53:14,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,307 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table133) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,307 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table134
2023-07-17 21:53:14,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,307 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table134) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,307 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table135
2023-07-17 21:53:14,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,308 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table135) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,308 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table136
2023-07-17 21:53:14,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,308 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table136) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,309 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table137
2023-07-17 21:53:14,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,309 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table137) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,309 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table138
2023-07-17 21:53:14,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,309 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table138) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,310 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table139
2023-07-17 21:53:14,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,310 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table139) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,310 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table60
2023-07-17 21:53:14,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,311 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table60) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,311 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table61
2023-07-17 21:53:14,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,311 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table61) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,311 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table62
2023-07-17 21:53:14,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,312 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table62) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,312 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table63
2023-07-17 21:53:14,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,312 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table63) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,312 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table64
2023-07-17 21:53:14,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,313 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table64) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,313 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table65
2023-07-17 21:53:14,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,313 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table65) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,313 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table66
2023-07-17 21:53:14,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,314 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table66) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,314 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table67
2023-07-17 21:53:14,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,314 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table67) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,314 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table140
2023-07-17 21:53:14,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,315 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table140) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,315 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table57
2023-07-17 21:53:14,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,315 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table57) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,315 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table58
2023-07-17 21:53:14,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,316 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table58) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,316 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table59
2023-07-17 21:53:14,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,316 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table59) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,316 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table50
2023-07-17 21:53:14,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,317 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table50) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,317 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table51
2023-07-17 21:53:14,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,317 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table51) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,318 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table52
2023-07-17 21:53:14,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,318 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table52) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,318 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table53
2023-07-17 21:53:14,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,319 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table53) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,319 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table54
2023-07-17 21:53:14,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,319 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table54) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,319 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table55
2023-07-17 21:53:14,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,320 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table55) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,320 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table56
2023-07-17 21:53:14,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,320 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table56) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,320 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table46
2023-07-17 21:53:14,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,321 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table46) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,321 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table152
2023-07-17 21:53:14,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,321 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table152) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,322 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table47
2023-07-17 21:53:14,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,322 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table47) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,322 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table153
2023-07-17 21:53:14,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,323 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table153) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,323 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table48
2023-07-17 21:53:14,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,323 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table48) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,323 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table154
2023-07-17 21:53:14,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,324 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table154) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,324 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table49
2023-07-17 21:53:14,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,324 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table49) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,324 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table40
2023-07-17 21:53:14,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,325 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table40) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,325 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table41
2023-07-17 21:53:14,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,325 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table41) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,325 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table42
2023-07-17 21:53:14,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,326 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table42) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,326 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table43
2023-07-17 21:53:14,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,326 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table43) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,326 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table44
2023-07-17 21:53:14,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,327 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table44) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,327 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table45
2023-07-17 21:53:14,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,327 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table45) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,327 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table35
2023-07-17 21:53:14,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,328 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table35) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,328 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table36
2023-07-17 21:53:14,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,328 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table36) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,328 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table37
2023-07-17 21:53:14,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,329 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table37) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,329 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table38
2023-07-17 21:53:14,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,329 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table38) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,329 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table100
2023-07-17 21:53:14,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,330 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table100) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,330 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table39
2023-07-17 21:53:14,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,331 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table39) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,331 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table101
2023-07-17 21:53:14,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,332 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table101) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,332 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table102
2023-07-17 21:53:14,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,333 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table102) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,333 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table103
2023-07-17 21:53:14,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,334 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table103) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,334 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table104
2023-07-17 21:53:14,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,335 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table104) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,335 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table105
2023-07-17 21:53:14,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,336 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table105) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,336 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table106
2023-07-17 21:53:14,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,337 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table106) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,337 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table107
2023-07-17 21:53:14,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,338 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table107) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,338 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table108
2023-07-17 21:53:14,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,339 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table108) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,339 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table109
2023-07-17 21:53:14,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,339 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table109) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,340 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table30
2023-07-17 21:53:14,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,340 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table30) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,341 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table31
2023-07-17 21:53:14,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,341 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table31) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,341 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table32
2023-07-17 21:53:14,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,342 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table32) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,342 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table33
2023-07-17 21:53:14,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,343 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table33) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,343 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table34
2023-07-17 21:53:14,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,344 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table34) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,344 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table24
2023-07-17 21:53:14,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,345 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table24) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,345 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table25
2023-07-17 21:53:14,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,346 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table25) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,346 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table26
2023-07-17 21:53:14,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,347 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table26) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,347 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table27
2023-07-17 21:53:14,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,347 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table27) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,347 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table28
2023-07-17 21:53:14,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,348 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table28) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,348 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table29
2023-07-17 21:53:14,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,348 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table29) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,348 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table20
2023-07-17 21:53:14,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,349 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table20) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,349 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table21
2023-07-17 21:53:14,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,349 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table21) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,349 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table22
2023-07-17 21:53:14,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,350 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table22) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,350 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table23
2023-07-17 21:53:14,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv496058706=6, srv26497901=5, srv2127159294=4, srv1644641787=1, srv52584654=7, srv1626781976=0, srv707358353=8, srv1933097891=3, srv954540098=9, srv1667328882=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,350 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table23) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,351 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table13
2023-07-17 21:53:14,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv400595281=6, srv518100598=7, srv2065001940=5, srv1502025363=1, srv1498238756=0, srv1734845837=3, srv1983301187=4, srv1580994853=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,351 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table13) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,351 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv400595281=6, srv518100598=7, srv2065001940=5, srv1502025363=1, srv1498238756=0, srv1734845837=3, srv1983301187=4, srv1580994853=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,351 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,352 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv400595281=6, srv518100598=7, srv2065001940=5, srv1502025363=1, srv1498238756=0, srv1734845837=3, srv1983301187=4, srv1580994853=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,352 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,352 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv400595281=6, srv518100598=7, srv2065001940=5, srv1502025363=1, srv1498238756=0, srv1734845837=3, srv1983301187=4, srv1580994853=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,353 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,353 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv400595281=6, srv518100598=7, srv2065001940=5, srv1502025363=1, srv1498238756=0, srv1734845837=3, srv1983301187=4, srv1580994853=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,354 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,354 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv400595281=6, srv518100598=7, srv2065001940=5, srv1502025363=1, srv1498238756=0, srv1734845837=3, srv1983301187=4, srv1580994853=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,354 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,354 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv400595281=6, srv518100598=7, srv2065001940=5, srv1502025363=1, srv1498238756=0, srv1734845837=3, srv1983301187=4, srv1580994853=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,355 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,355 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv400595281=6, srv518100598=7, srv2065001940=5, srv1502025363=1, srv1498238756=0, srv1734845837=3, srv1983301187=4, srv1580994853=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,355 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table9) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,355 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv400595281=6, srv518100598=7, srv2065001940=5, srv1502025363=1, srv1498238756=0, srv1734845837=3, srv1983301187=4, srv1580994853=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,356 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table8) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,356 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table10
2023-07-17 21:53:14,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv400595281=6, srv518100598=7, srv2065001940=5, srv1502025363=1, srv1498238756=0, srv1734845837=3, srv1983301187=4, srv1580994853=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,356 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table10) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,356 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv400595281=6, srv518100598=7, srv2065001940=5, srv1502025363=1, srv1498238756=0, srv1734845837=3, srv1983301187=4, srv1580994853=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,356 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,356 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table11
2023-07-17 21:53:14,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv400595281=6, srv518100598=7, srv2065001940=5, srv1502025363=1, srv1498238756=0, srv1734845837=3, srv1983301187=4, srv1580994853=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,357 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table11) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,357 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv400595281=6, srv518100598=7, srv2065001940=5, srv1502025363=1, srv1498238756=0, srv1734845837=3, srv1983301187=4, srv1580994853=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,358 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,358 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table12
2023-07-17 21:53:14,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv400595281=6, srv518100598=7, srv2065001940=5, srv1502025363=1, srv1498238756=0, srv1734845837=3, srv1983301187=4, srv1580994853=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,358 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table12) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,359 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table13
2023-07-17 21:53:14,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv157941285=1, srv1466490097=0, srv2052062966=2, srv653252493=4, srv978196893=7, srv399101297=3, srv948731417=6, srv685612594=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,359 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table13) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,359 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv157941285=1, srv1466490097=0, srv2052062966=2, srv653252493=4, srv978196893=7, srv399101297=3, srv948731417=6, srv685612594=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,360 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,360 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv157941285=1, srv1466490097=0, srv2052062966=2, srv653252493=4, srv978196893=7, srv399101297=3, srv948731417=6, srv685612594=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,361 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,361 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv157941285=1, srv1466490097=0, srv2052062966=2, srv653252493=4, srv978196893=7, srv399101297=3, srv948731417=6, srv685612594=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,361 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,361 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv157941285=1, srv1466490097=0, srv2052062966=2, srv653252493=4, srv978196893=7, srv399101297=3, srv948731417=6, srv685612594=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,362 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,362 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv157941285=1, srv1466490097=0, srv2052062966=2, srv653252493=4, srv978196893=7, srv399101297=3, srv948731417=6, srv685612594=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,363 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,363 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv157941285=1, srv1466490097=0, srv2052062966=2, srv653252493=4, srv978196893=7, srv399101297=3, srv948731417=6, srv685612594=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,363 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,364 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv157941285=1, srv1466490097=0, srv2052062966=2, srv653252493=4, srv978196893=7, srv399101297=3, srv948731417=6, srv685612594=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,364 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table9) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,364 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv157941285=1, srv1466490097=0, srv2052062966=2, srv653252493=4, srv978196893=7, srv399101297=3, srv948731417=6, srv685612594=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,365 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table8) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,365 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table10
2023-07-17 21:53:14,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv157941285=1, srv1466490097=0, srv2052062966=2, srv653252493=4, srv978196893=7, srv399101297=3, srv948731417=6, srv685612594=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,365 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table10) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,365 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv157941285=1, srv1466490097=0, srv2052062966=2, srv653252493=4, srv978196893=7, srv399101297=3, srv948731417=6, srv685612594=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,366 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,366 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table11
2023-07-17 21:53:14,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv157941285=1, srv1466490097=0, srv2052062966=2, srv653252493=4, srv978196893=7, srv399101297=3, srv948731417=6, srv685612594=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,366 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table11) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,366 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv157941285=1, srv1466490097=0, srv2052062966=2, srv653252493=4, srv978196893=7, srv399101297=3, srv948731417=6, srv685612594=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,367 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,367 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table12
2023-07-17 21:53:14,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv157941285=1, srv1466490097=0, srv2052062966=2, srv653252493=4, srv978196893=7, srv399101297=3, srv948731417=6, srv685612594=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,367 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table12) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,369 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table13
2023-07-17 21:53:14,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,370 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table13) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,370 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table14
2023-07-17 21:53:14,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,370 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table14) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,370 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table120
2023-07-17 21:53:14,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,371 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table120) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,371 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table15
2023-07-17 21:53:14,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,372 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table15) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,372 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table121
2023-07-17 21:53:14,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,373 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table121) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,373 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table16
2023-07-17 21:53:14,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,374 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table16) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,374 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table122
2023-07-17 21:53:14,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,375 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table122) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,375 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table17
2023-07-17 21:53:14,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,375 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table17) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,375 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table123
2023-07-17 21:53:14,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,376 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table123) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,376 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table18
2023-07-17 21:53:14,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,377 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table18) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,377 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table124
2023-07-17 21:53:14,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,378 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table124) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,378 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table19
2023-07-17 21:53:14,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,379 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table19) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,379 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table125
2023-07-17 21:53:14,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,379 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table125) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,379 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table126
2023-07-17 21:53:14,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,380 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table126) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,380 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table127
2023-07-17 21:53:14,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,381 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table127) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,381 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table128
2023-07-17 21:53:14,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,382 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table128) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,382 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table129
2023-07-17 21:53:14,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,383 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table129) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,383 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table90
2023-07-17 21:53:14,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,383 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table90) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,383 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table91
2023-07-17 21:53:14,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,384 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table91) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,384 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table92
2023-07-17 21:53:14,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,384 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table92) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,384 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table93
2023-07-17 21:53:14,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,385 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table93) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,385 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table94
2023-07-17 21:53:14,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,385 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table94) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,385 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table95
2023-07-17 21:53:14,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,386 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table95) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,386 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table96
2023-07-17 21:53:14,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,387 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table96) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,387 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table97
2023-07-17 21:53:14,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,387 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table97) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,387 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table10
2023-07-17 21:53:14,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,388 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table10) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,388 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table98
2023-07-17 21:53:14,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,388 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table98) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,388 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table11
2023-07-17 21:53:14,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,389 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table11) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,389 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table99
2023-07-17 21:53:14,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,389 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table99) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,389 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table12
2023-07-17 21:53:14,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,389 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table12) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,390 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table110
2023-07-17 21:53:14,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,390 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table110) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,390 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table111
2023-07-17 21:53:14,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,390 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table111) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,390 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table112
2023-07-17 21:53:14,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,391 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table112) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,391 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table113
2023-07-17 21:53:14,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,391 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table113) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,391 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table114
2023-07-17 21:53:14,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,392 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table114) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,392 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table115
2023-07-17 21:53:14,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,393 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table115) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,393 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table116
2023-07-17 21:53:14,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,394 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table116) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,394 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table117
2023-07-17 21:53:14,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,394 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table117) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,395 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table118
2023-07-17 21:53:14,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,395 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table118) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,395 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table119
2023-07-17 21:53:14,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,396 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table119) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,396 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table80
2023-07-17 21:53:14,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,396 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table80) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,396 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table81
2023-07-17 21:53:14,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,397 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table81) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,397 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table82
2023-07-17 21:53:14,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,398 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table82) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,398 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table83
2023-07-17 21:53:14,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,398 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table83) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,398 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table84
2023-07-17 21:53:14,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,399 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table84) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,399 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table85
2023-07-17 21:53:14,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,399 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table85) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,399 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table86
2023-07-17 21:53:14,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,400 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table86) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,400 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table87
2023-07-17 21:53:14,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,400 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table87) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,400 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table88
2023-07-17 21:53:14,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,400 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table88) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,401 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table89
2023-07-17 21:53:14,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,401 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table89) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,401 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table79
2023-07-17 21:53:14,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,401 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table79) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,401 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,402 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,402 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,402 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,402 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,403 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,403 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,403 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,403 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,404 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,404 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,404 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,404 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table70
2023-07-17 21:53:14,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,405 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table70) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,405 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table71
2023-07-17 21:53:14,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,405 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table71) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,405 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table72
2023-07-17 21:53:14,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,406 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table72) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,406 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table73
2023-07-17 21:53:14,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,406 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table73) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,406 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table74
2023-07-17 21:53:14,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,407 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table74) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,407 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,408 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table9) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,408 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table75
2023-07-17 21:53:14,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,408 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table75) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,408 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,409 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table8) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,409 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table76
2023-07-17 21:53:14,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,409 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table76) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,409 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,410 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,410 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table77
2023-07-17 21:53:14,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,410 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table77) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,410 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,411 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,411 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table78
2023-07-17 21:53:14,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,411 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table78) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,411 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table68
2023-07-17 21:53:14,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,412 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table68) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,412 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table69
2023-07-17 21:53:14,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,412 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table69) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,413 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table60
2023-07-17 21:53:14,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,413 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table60) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,413 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table61
2023-07-17 21:53:14,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,413 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table61) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,413 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table62
2023-07-17 21:53:14,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,414 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table62) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,414 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table63
2023-07-17 21:53:14,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,414 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table63) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,414 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table64
2023-07-17 21:53:14,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,415 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table64) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,415 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table65
2023-07-17 21:53:14,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,415 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table65) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,415 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table66
2023-07-17 21:53:14,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,416 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table66) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,416 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table67
2023-07-17 21:53:14,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,416 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table67) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,416 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table57
2023-07-17 21:53:14,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,417 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table57) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,417 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table58
2023-07-17 21:53:14,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,417 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table58) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,418 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table59
2023-07-17 21:53:14,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,418 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table59) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,418 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table50
2023-07-17 21:53:14,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,419 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table50) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,419 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table51
2023-07-17 21:53:14,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,419 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table51) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,419 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table52
2023-07-17 21:53:14,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,420 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table52) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,420 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table53
2023-07-17 21:53:14,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,421 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table53) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,421 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table54
2023-07-17 21:53:14,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,421 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table54) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,421 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table55
2023-07-17 21:53:14,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,422 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table55) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,422 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table56
2023-07-17 21:53:14,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,422 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table56) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,422 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table46
2023-07-17 21:53:14,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,423 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table46) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,423 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table47
2023-07-17 21:53:14,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,423 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table47) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,423 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table48
2023-07-17 21:53:14,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,424 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table48) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,424 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table49
2023-07-17 21:53:14,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,424 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table49) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,424 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table40
2023-07-17 21:53:14,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,425 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table40) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,425 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table41
2023-07-17 21:53:14,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,425 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table41) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,425 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table42
2023-07-17 21:53:14,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,426 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table42) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,426 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table43
2023-07-17 21:53:14,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,426 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table43) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,426 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table44
2023-07-17 21:53:14,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,426 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table44) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,426 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table45
2023-07-17 21:53:14,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,427 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table45) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,427 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table35
2023-07-17 21:53:14,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,428 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table35) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,428 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table36
2023-07-17 21:53:14,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,429 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table36) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,429 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table37
2023-07-17 21:53:14,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,429 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table37) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,429 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table38
2023-07-17 21:53:14,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,430 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table38) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,430 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table100
2023-07-17 21:53:14,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,430 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table100) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,430 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table39
2023-07-17 21:53:14,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,431 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table39) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,431 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table101
2023-07-17 21:53:14,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,431 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table101) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,431 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table102
2023-07-17 21:53:14,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,432 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table102) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,432 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table103
2023-07-17 21:53:14,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,432 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table103) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,432 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table104
2023-07-17 21:53:14,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,432 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table104) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,432 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table105
2023-07-17 21:53:14,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,433 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table105) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,433 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table106
2023-07-17 21:53:14,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,433 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table106) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,433 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table107
2023-07-17 21:53:14,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,434 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table107) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,434 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table108
2023-07-17 21:53:14,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,434 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table108) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,434 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table109
2023-07-17 21:53:14,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,435 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table109) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,435 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table30
2023-07-17 21:53:14,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,435 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table30) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,435 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table31
2023-07-17 21:53:14,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,436 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table31) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,436 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table32
2023-07-17 21:53:14,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,436 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table32) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,436 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table33
2023-07-17 21:53:14,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,437 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table33) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,437 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table34
2023-07-17 21:53:14,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,437 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table34) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,437 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table24
2023-07-17 21:53:14,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,438 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table24) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,438 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table25
2023-07-17 21:53:14,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,439 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table25) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,439 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table26
2023-07-17 21:53:14,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,439 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table26) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,439 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table27
2023-07-17 21:53:14,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,440 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table27) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,440 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table28
2023-07-17 21:53:14,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,441 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table28) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,441 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table29
2023-07-17 21:53:14,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,441 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table29) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,441 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table20
2023-07-17 21:53:14,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,442 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table20) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,442 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table21
2023-07-17 21:53:14,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,442 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table21) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,442 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table22
2023-07-17 21:53:14,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,442 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table22) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,443 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table23
2023-07-17 21:53:14,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1721463570=6, srv1106798841=1, srv1325593888=3, srv1685627326=5, srv1189453650=2, srv1003228893=0, srv1477902732=4, srv321881308=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,443 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table23) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,445 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table13
2023-07-17 21:53:14,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,445 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table13) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,445 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table14
2023-07-17 21:53:14,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,446 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table14) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,446 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table120
2023-07-17 21:53:14,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,446 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table120) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,446 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table15
2023-07-17 21:53:14,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,447 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table15) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,447 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table121
2023-07-17 21:53:14,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,447 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table121) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,447 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table16
2023-07-17 21:53:14,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,448 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table16) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,448 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table122
2023-07-17 21:53:14,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,448 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table122) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,448 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table17
2023-07-17 21:53:14,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,449 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table17) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,449 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table123
2023-07-17 21:53:14,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,449 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table123) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,449 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table18
2023-07-17 21:53:14,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,450 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table18) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,450 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table124
2023-07-17 21:53:14,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,451 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table124) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,451 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table19
2023-07-17 21:53:14,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,451 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table19) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,451 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table125
2023-07-17 21:53:14,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,452 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table125) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,452 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table126
2023-07-17 21:53:14,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,452 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table126) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,452 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table127
2023-07-17 21:53:14,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,453 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table127) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,453 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table128
2023-07-17 21:53:14,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,453 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table128) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,453 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table129
2023-07-17 21:53:14,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,453 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table129) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,453 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table90
2023-07-17 21:53:14,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,454 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table90) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,454 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table91
2023-07-17 21:53:14,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,454 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table91) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,454 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table92
2023-07-17 21:53:14,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,455 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table92) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,455 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table93
2023-07-17 21:53:14,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,455 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table93) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,455 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table94
2023-07-17 21:53:14,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,456 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table94) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,456 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table95
2023-07-17 21:53:14,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,456 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table95) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,456 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table96
2023-07-17 21:53:14,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,457 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table96) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,457 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table97
2023-07-17 21:53:14,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,457 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table97) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,457 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table10
2023-07-17 21:53:14,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,458 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table10) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,458 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table98
2023-07-17 21:53:14,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,458 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table98) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,458 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table11
2023-07-17 21:53:14,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,459 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table11) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,459 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table99
2023-07-17 21:53:14,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,459 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table99) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,459 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table12
2023-07-17 21:53:14,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,460 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table12) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,460 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table110
2023-07-17 21:53:14,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,461 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table110) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,461 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table111
2023-07-17 21:53:14,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,461 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table111) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,461 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table112
2023-07-17 21:53:14,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,462 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table112) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,462 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table113
2023-07-17 21:53:14,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,463 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table113) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,463 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table114
2023-07-17 21:53:14,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,463 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table114) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,463 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table115
2023-07-17 21:53:14,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,464 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table115) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,464 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table116
2023-07-17 21:53:14,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,464 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table116) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,464 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table117
2023-07-17 21:53:14,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,465 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table117) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,465 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table118
2023-07-17 21:53:14,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,465 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table118) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,465 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table119
2023-07-17 21:53:14,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,466 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table119) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,466 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table80
2023-07-17 21:53:14,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,466 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table80) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,466 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table81
2023-07-17 21:53:14,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,467 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table81) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,467 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table82
2023-07-17 21:53:14,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,467 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table82) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,468 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table83
2023-07-17 21:53:14,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,468 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table83) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,468 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table84
2023-07-17 21:53:14,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,469 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table84) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,469 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table85
2023-07-17 21:53:14,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,470 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table85) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,470 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table86
2023-07-17 21:53:14,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,471 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table86) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,471 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table87
2023-07-17 21:53:14,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,472 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table87) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,472 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table88
2023-07-17 21:53:14,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,473 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table88) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,473 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table89
2023-07-17 21:53:14,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,473 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table89) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,474 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table79
2023-07-17 21:53:14,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,474 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table79) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,474 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,475 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,475 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,475 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,475 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,475 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,476 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,476 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,476 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,476 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,476 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,477 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,477 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table70
2023-07-17 21:53:14,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,477 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table70) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,477 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table71
2023-07-17 21:53:14,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,478 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table71) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,478 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table72
2023-07-17 21:53:14,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,478 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table72) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,478 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table73
2023-07-17 21:53:14,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,479 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table73) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,479 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table74
2023-07-17 21:53:14,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,479 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table74) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,479 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,480 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table9) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,480 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table75
2023-07-17 21:53:14,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,480 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table75) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,480 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,481 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table8) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,481 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table76
2023-07-17 21:53:14,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,481 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table76) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,481 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,482 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,482 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table77
2023-07-17 21:53:14,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,482 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table77) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,482 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,483 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,483 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table78
2023-07-17 21:53:14,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,483 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table78) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,483 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table68
2023-07-17 21:53:14,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,484 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table68) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,484 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table130
2023-07-17 21:53:14,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,484 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table130) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,484 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table69
2023-07-17 21:53:14,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,485 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table69) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,485 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table131
2023-07-17 21:53:14,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,485 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table131) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,485 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table132
2023-07-17 21:53:14,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,486 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table132) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,486 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table133
2023-07-17 21:53:14,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,486 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table133) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,486 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table134
2023-07-17 21:53:14,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,487 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table134) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,487 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table135
2023-07-17 21:53:14,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,487 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table135) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,487 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table136
2023-07-17 21:53:14,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,487 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table136) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,487 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table137
2023-07-17 21:53:14,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,488 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table137) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,488 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table138
2023-07-17 21:53:14,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,488 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table138) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,488 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table139
2023-07-17 21:53:14,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,489 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table139) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,489 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table60
2023-07-17 21:53:14,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,489 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table60) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,489 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table61
2023-07-17 21:53:14,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,490 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table61) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,490 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table62
2023-07-17 21:53:14,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,490 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table62) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,490 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table63
2023-07-17 21:53:14,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,491 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table63) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,491 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table64
2023-07-17 21:53:14,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,491 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table64) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,491 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table65
2023-07-17 21:53:14,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,492 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table65) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,492 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table66
2023-07-17 21:53:14,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,492 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table66) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,492 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table67
2023-07-17 21:53:14,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,493 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table67) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,493 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table57
2023-07-17 21:53:14,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,494 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table57) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,494 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table58
2023-07-17 21:53:14,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,494 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table58) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,494 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table59
2023-07-17 21:53:14,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,495 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table59) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,495 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table50
2023-07-17 21:53:14,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,496 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table50) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,496 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table51
2023-07-17 21:53:14,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,497 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table51) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,497 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table52
2023-07-17 21:53:14,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,498 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table52) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,498 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table53
2023-07-17 21:53:14,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,498 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table53) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,499 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table54
2023-07-17 21:53:14,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,499 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table54) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,499 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table55
2023-07-17 21:53:14,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,500 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table55) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,500 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table56
2023-07-17 21:53:14,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,501 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table56) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,501 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table46
2023-07-17 21:53:14,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,502 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table46) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,502 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table47
2023-07-17 21:53:14,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,503 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table47) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,503 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table48
2023-07-17 21:53:14,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,504 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table48) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,504 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table49
2023-07-17 21:53:14,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,504 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table49) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,504 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table40
2023-07-17 21:53:14,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,505 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table40) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,505 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table41
2023-07-17 21:53:14,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,506 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table41) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,506 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table42
2023-07-17 21:53:14,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,507 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table42) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,507 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table43
2023-07-17 21:53:14,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,508 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table43) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,508 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table44
2023-07-17 21:53:14,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,509 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table44) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,509 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table45
2023-07-17 21:53:14,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,510 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table45) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,510 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table35
2023-07-17 21:53:14,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,511 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table35) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,511 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table36
2023-07-17 21:53:14,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,511 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table36) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,511 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table37
2023-07-17 21:53:14,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,512 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table37) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,512 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table38
2023-07-17 21:53:14,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,513 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table38) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,513 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table100
2023-07-17 21:53:14,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,514 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table100) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,514 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table39
2023-07-17 21:53:14,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,515 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table39) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,515 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table101
2023-07-17 21:53:14,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,516 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table101) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,516 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table102
2023-07-17 21:53:14,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,516 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table102) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,516 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table103
2023-07-17 21:53:14,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,517 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table103) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,517 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table104
2023-07-17 21:53:14,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,518 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table104) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,518 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table105
2023-07-17 21:53:14,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,518 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table105) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,518 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table106
2023-07-17 21:53:14,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,518 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table106) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,519 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table107
2023-07-17 21:53:14,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,519 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table107) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,519 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table108
2023-07-17 21:53:14,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,519 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table108) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,519 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table109
2023-07-17 21:53:14,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,520 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table109) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,520 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table30
2023-07-17 21:53:14,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,520 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table30) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,520 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table31
2023-07-17 21:53:14,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,521 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table31) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,521 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table32
2023-07-17 21:53:14,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,522 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table32) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,522 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table33
2023-07-17 21:53:14,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,522 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table33) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,522 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table34
2023-07-17 21:53:14,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,523 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table34) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,523 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table24
2023-07-17 21:53:14,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,523 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table24) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,523 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table25
2023-07-17 21:53:14,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,523 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table25) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,524 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table26
2023-07-17 21:53:14,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,524 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table26) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,524 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table27
2023-07-17 21:53:14,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,524 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table27) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,524 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table28
2023-07-17 21:53:14,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,525 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table28) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,525 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table29
2023-07-17 21:53:14,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,525 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table29) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,525 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table20
2023-07-17 21:53:14,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,526 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table20) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,526 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table21
2023-07-17 21:53:14,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,526 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table21) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,526 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table22
2023-07-17 21:53:14,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,527 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table22) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,527 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table23
2023-07-17 21:53:14,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107268351=0, srv1876732375=6, srv1260406949=2, srv1712397298=5, srv1367976830=3, srv146586599=4, srv117143018=1, srv822116343=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,527 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table23) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,527 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv621720611=4, srv1048364091=0, srv1520824970=1, srv1798767347=2, srv1884231234=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=5, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,528 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,528 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv621720611=4, srv1048364091=0, srv1520824970=1, srv1798767347=2, srv1884231234=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=5, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,528 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,528 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv621720611=4, srv1048364091=0, srv1520824970=1, srv1798767347=2, srv1884231234=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=5, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,528 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,528 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv621720611=4, srv1048364091=0, srv1520824970=1, srv1798767347=2, srv1884231234=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=5, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,529 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,529 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv621720611=4, srv1048364091=0, srv1520824970=1, srv1798767347=2, srv1884231234=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=5, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,529 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,549 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table13
2023-07-17 21:53:14,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv871358531=369, srv64697211=312, srv653261481=314, srv1778141916=154, srv716510755=323, srv372169288=255, srv568235512=298, srv710229516=322, srv537137712=293, srv1682791519=131, srv642353994=311, srv1046656068=13, srv993792848=391, srv1202667070=39, srv99567927=392, srv1607947050=111, srv1677371877=129, srv1763526149=150, srv1763378353=149, srv531263272=289, srv448398842=270, srv802808934=348, srv77960001=340, srv453521623=271, srv162773041=114, srv563606057=295, srv1659238910=122, srv1279307656=55, srv1914255334=183, srv1296605582=61, srv2131597846=222, srv1375359355=72, srv1405269336=79, srv175680261=147, srv282211488=242, srv1412891098=82, srv375712549=257, srv191234370=182, srv1574132168=106, srv1853511149=168, srv617306884=307, srv268601623=238, srv1400099806=78, srv477381292=275, srv1279442050=56, srv535853198=292, srv1767480590=152, srv2100700333=211, srv1187847151=37, srv791064637=345, srv74478935=330, srv1206084762=41, srv1497856295=97, srv897884865=377, srv398014971=261, srv786136704=342, srv1429879791=86, srv1201763981=38, srv1415213844=84, srv302220908=243, srv156683359=105, srv1974497084=192, srv535358845=291, srv627763604=308, srv732106437=326, srv1679724304=130, srv576770232=299, srv478480013=276, srv1237250370=47, srv1169018295=34, srv32320833=248, srv594880186=304, srv216306370=225, srv656484240=315, srv818754908=354, srv1321058011=63, srv1256345927=52, srv1670847243=126, srv1515243164=99, srv1781378955=156, srv508388209=278, srv1910886192=180, srv1718898730=139, srv772274482=337, srv1433624807=87, srv848605385=359, srv2107957639=212, srv270591905=240, srv2126706298=219, srv2080681743=209, srv1683990934=132, srv11526364=28, srv761020484=334, srv1720507603=141, srv266276730=236, srv935213051=386, srv923440665=383, srv1911104834=181, srv1944131651=187, srv1162841146=30, srv1921230216=185, srv319459319=247, srv1168022226=33, srv57689659=300, srv716533901=324, srv1255156178=50, srv441379967=267, srv806979625=350, srv788255577=344, srv976533744=389, srv1317853355=62, srv1491073587=96, srv777865249=339, srv2130226580=221, srv873230355=370, srv971370780=388, srv2008207413=197, srv989150800=390, srv737980208=328, srv862088563=363, srv1716783669=138, srv1801293056=160, srv1363984373=68, srv515711115=282, srv1378945327=75, srv17002515=136, srv853498273=361, srv1825292480=165, srv2124576425=217, srv1889349340=175, srv527691188=286, srv1226737728=44, srv1781498156=157, srv104267960=11, srv1663644309=124, srv1672213768=127, srv740402944=329, srv555807163=294, srv566277037=296, srv734882045=327, srv1143683685=27, srv1021400966=5, srv694407347=319, srv1626790310=113, srv303328507=244, srv1869166689=171, srv781623755=341, srv40741117=264, srv1958265988=190, srv592380483=303, srv483565354=277, srv1531731329=100, srv359746409=253, srv1271131029=54, srv1007512250=2, srv1783696565=158, srv1284150263=57, srv1648846971=118, srv120365207=40, srv263085176=235, srv535080964=290, srv824739010=357, srv744793832=331, srv1073394883=18, srv1113186104=23, srv1370321362=69, srv328204461=249, srv1604342762=109, srv266460489=237, srv313806624=245, srv1473408823=93, srv865692144=366, srv42814401=265, srv104065318=10, srv1599236554=108, srv1476834435=94, srv1673452142=128, srv716892727=325, srv1501773847=98, srv791504502=346, srv367902453=254, srv254349567=232, srv2126102976=218, srv252714068=231, srv916506189=380, srv687320190=318, srv1000433998=0, srv51396503=281, srv648464134=313, srv908419423=379, srv204022732=200, srv1901650254=177, srv200342397=196, srv765841762=335, srv1849125656=167, srv235281774=226, srv2137298641=224, srv517347076=283, srv1687711069=135, srv800105834=347, srv1609917009=112, srv1038797815=9, srv863216619=365, srv921796978=382, srv895924009=376, srv319002955=246, srv611122413=305, srv1942590787=186, srv529333113=288, srv1053973741=14, srv1988512138=194, srv1037112526=8, srv442327402=268, srv2062351281=204, srv1240518778=48, srv471289019=274, srv1857090224=170, srv1543025253=101, srv1915241294=184, srv238420451=228, srv1747796150=145, srv1101668258=21, srv1437034663=88, srv1173449481=35, srv582652595=301, srv1739043021=144, srv1733173130=143, srv465824154=272, srv14463216=91, srv1720161153=140, srv1549403995=102, srv235920151=227, srv1909060246=179, srv527988350=287, srv1801762669=161, srv89501442=375, srv442994824=269, srv1414012241=83, srv165153258=121, srv1766333515=151, srv2063438865=205, srv1071671801=17, srv1638570398=116, srv1035353226=7, srv1856921753=169, srv1887444158=173, srv1897306674=176, srv1255718022=51, srv1260078897=53, srv1372945218=70, srv1163715139=31, srv175471358=146, srv1558656747=104, srv1463869996=92, srv124825865=49, srv1142495625=26, srv1397803774=77, srv1644508836=117, srv1807320536=162, srv1165273546=32, srv1650978005=120, srv1374260725=71, srv2065239646=206, srv1685737274=134, srv878340336=371, srv329463090=250, srv2112675912=213, srv1378293943=74, srv787532288=343, srv1292867420=59, srv519831391=285, srv1002018470=1, srv822141051=356, srv1229740495=45, srv706370370=321, srv255741565=233, srv1177018836=36, srv1223505925=43, srv745532463=332, srv1820836786=163, srv2127145828=220, srv2124524081=216, srv665150476=316, srv2132621880=223, srv2051928856=203, srv1903063797=178, srv881186303=373, srv1758974023=148, srv270549378=239, srv2014789268=198, srv1663469360=123, srv1331983035=65, srv1768940632=153, srv2084732799=210, srv1043044287=12, srv630246195=309, srv86319792=364, srv37305654=256, srv1650394019=119, srv1888093001=174, srv512441512=280, srv813969264=352, srv277288989=241, srv2017714321=199, srv1410469782=81, srv751917673=333, srv1443060804=89, srv1997063872=195, srv404426071=263, srv1443287861=90, srv695697141=320, srv636958174=310, srv1105584096=22, srv583005569=302, srv92523166=384, srv330226906=251, srv1684865692=133, srv381463497=258, srv567942525=297, srv1010403208=3, srv881516937=374, srv140693587=80, srv1872213858=172, srv262210172=234, srv846799674=358, srv851169364=360, srv880017865=372, srv129190288=58, srv401606217=262, srv669535820=317, srv1325384866=64, srv1377673856=73, srv1416276025=85, srv430431276=266, srv81513922=353, srv2044458062=201, srv2118166427=214, srv1665530216=125, srv2045587532=202, srv1824773168=164, srv2071913725=208, srv1295499145=60, srv1780304939=155, srv612277490=306, srv102508625=6, srv1637539828=115, srv820424989=355, srv50966795=279, srv1950402166=188, srv1207208580=42, srv1057648579=16, srv1084295726=20, srv39165764=260, srv959379519=387, srv2066402828=207, srv1556810592=103, srv1232731779=46, srv1606144164=110, srv1487275322=95, srv519310224=284, srv775221203=338, srv1079168923=19, srv1957834842=189, srv866525142=367, srv243907419=229, srv248553307=230, srv344122075=252, srv467461515=273, srv805609280=349, srv1018507425=4, srv1827511993=166, srv1704639485=137, srv855754935=362, srv1057024901=15, srv1116429721=24, srv927375731=385, srv1383836323=76, srv1584407048=107, srv809779157=351, srv1786622589=159, srv869541705=368, srv1123072042=25, srv1726136626=142, srv135800579=67, srv1958676591=191, srv390748718=259, srv907223095=378, srv76871917=336, srv1160170031=29, srv2119727728=215, srv918100507=381, srv1352063642=66, srv1975716907=193} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-17 21:53:14,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-17 21:53:14,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-17 21:53:14,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-17 21:53:14,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-17 21:53:14,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-17 21:53:14,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-17 21:53:14,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-17 21:53:14,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-17 21:53:14,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-17 21:53:14,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-17 21:53:14,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-17 21:53:14,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-17 21:53:14,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-17 21:53:14,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-17 21:53:14,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-17 21:53:14,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-17 21:53:14,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-17 21:53:14,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-17 21:53:14,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-17 21:53:14,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-17 21:53:14,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-17 21:53:14,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-17 21:53:14,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-17 21:53:14,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-17 21:53:14,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-17 21:53:14,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-17 21:53:14,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-17 21:53:14,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-17 21:53:14,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-17 21:53:14,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-17 21:53:14,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-17 21:53:14,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-17 21:53:14,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-17 21:53:14,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-17 21:53:14,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-17 21:53:14,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-17 21:53:14,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-17 21:53:14,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-17 21:53:14,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-17 21:53:14,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-17 21:53:14,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-17 21:53:14,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-17 21:53:14,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-17 21:53:14,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-17 21:53:14,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-17 21:53:14,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-17 21:53:14,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-17 21:53:14,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-17 21:53:14,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-17 21:53:14,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-17 21:53:14,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-17 21:53:14,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-17 21:53:14,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-17 21:53:14,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-17 21:53:14,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-17 21:53:14,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-17 21:53:14,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-17 21:53:14,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-17 21:53:14,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-17 21:53:14,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-17 21:53:14,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-17 21:53:14,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-17 21:53:14,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-17 21:53:14,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-17 21:53:14,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-17 21:53:14,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-17 21:53:14,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-17 21:53:14,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-17 21:53:14,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-17 21:53:14,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-17 21:53:14,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-17 21:53:14,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-17 21:53:14,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-17 21:53:14,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-17 21:53:14,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-17 21:53:14,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-17 21:53:14,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-17 21:53:14,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-17 21:53:14,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-17 21:53:14,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-17 21:53:14,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-17 21:53:14,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-17 21:53:14,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-17 21:53:14,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-17 21:53:14,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-17 21:53:14,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-17 21:53:14,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-17 21:53:14,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-17 21:53:14,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-17 21:53:14,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-17 21:53:14,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-17 21:53:14,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-17 21:53:14,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-17 21:53:14,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-17 21:53:14,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-17 21:53:14,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-17 21:53:14,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-17 21:53:14,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-17 21:53:14,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-17 21:53:14,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-17 21:53:14,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-17 21:53:14,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-17 21:53:14,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-17 21:53:14,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-17 21:53:14,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-17 21:53:14,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-17 21:53:14,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-17 21:53:14,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-17 21:53:14,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-17 21:53:14,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-17 21:53:14,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-17 21:53:14,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-17 21:53:14,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-17 21:53:14,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-17 21:53:14,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-17 21:53:14,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-17 21:53:14,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-17 21:53:14,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-17 21:53:14,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-17 21:53:14,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-17 21:53:14,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-17 21:53:14,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-17 21:53:14,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-17 21:53:14,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-17 21:53:14,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-17 21:53:14,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-17 21:53:14,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-17 21:53:14,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-17 21:53:14,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-17 21:53:14,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-17 21:53:14,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-17 21:53:14,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-17 21:53:14,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-17 21:53:14,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-17 21:53:14,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-17 21:53:14,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-17 21:53:14,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-17 21:53:14,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-17 21:53:14,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-17 21:53:14,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-17 21:53:14,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-17 21:53:14,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-17 21:53:14,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-17 21:53:14,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-17 21:53:14,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-17 21:53:14,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-17 21:53:14,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-17 21:53:14,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-17 21:53:14,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-17 21:53:14,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-17 21:53:14,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-17 21:53:14,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-17 21:53:14,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-17 21:53:14,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-17 21:53:14,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-17 21:53:14,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-17 21:53:14,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-17 21:53:14,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-17 21:53:14,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-17 21:53:14,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-17 21:53:14,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-17 21:53:14,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-17 21:53:14,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-17 21:53:14,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-17 21:53:14,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-17 21:53:14,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-17 21:53:14,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-17 21:53:14,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-17 21:53:14,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-17 21:53:14,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-17 21:53:14,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-17 21:53:14,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-17 21:53:14,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-17 21:53:14,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-17 21:53:14,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-17 21:53:14,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-17 21:53:14,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-17 21:53:14,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-17 21:53:14,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-17 21:53:14,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-17 21:53:14,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-17 21:53:14,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-17 21:53:14,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-17 21:53:14,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-17 21:53:14,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-17 21:53:14,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-17 21:53:14,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-17 21:53:14,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-17 21:53:14,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-17 21:53:14,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-17 21:53:14,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-17 21:53:14,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-17 21:53:14,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-17 21:53:14,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-17 21:53:14,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-17 21:53:14,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-17 21:53:14,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-17 21:53:14,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-17 21:53:14,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-17 21:53:14,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-17 21:53:14,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-17 21:53:14,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-17 21:53:14,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-17 21:53:14,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-17 21:53:14,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-17 21:53:14,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-17 21:53:14,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-17 21:53:14,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-17 21:53:14,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-17 21:53:14,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-17 21:53:14,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-17 21:53:14,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-17 21:53:14,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-17 21:53:14,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-17 21:53:14,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-17 21:53:14,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-17 21:53:14,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-17 21:53:14,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-17 21:53:14,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-17 21:53:14,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-17 21:53:14,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-17 21:53:14,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-17 21:53:14,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-17 21:53:14,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-17 21:53:14,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-17 21:53:14,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-17 21:53:14,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-17 21:53:14,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-17 21:53:14,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-17 21:53:14,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-17 21:53:14,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-17 21:53:14,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-17 21:53:14,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-17 21:53:14,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-17 21:53:14,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-17 21:53:14,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-17 21:53:14,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-17 21:53:14,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-17 21:53:14,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-17 21:53:14,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-17 21:53:14,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-17 21:53:14,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-17 21:53:14,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-17 21:53:14,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-17 21:53:14,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-17 21:53:14,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-17 21:53:14,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-17 21:53:14,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-17 21:53:14,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-17 21:53:14,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-17 21:53:14,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-17 21:53:14,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-17 21:53:14,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-17 21:53:14,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-17 21:53:14,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-17 21:53:14,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-17 21:53:14,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-17 21:53:14,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-17 21:53:14,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-17 21:53:14,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-17 21:53:14,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-17 21:53:14,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-17 21:53:14,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-17 21:53:14,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-17 21:53:14,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-17 21:53:14,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-17 21:53:14,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-17 21:53:14,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-17 21:53:14,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-17 21:53:14,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-17 21:53:14,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-17 21:53:14,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-17 21:53:14,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-17 21:53:14,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-17 21:53:14,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-17 21:53:14,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-17 21:53:14,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-17 21:53:14,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-17 21:53:14,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-17 21:53:14,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-17 21:53:14,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-17 21:53:14,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-17 21:53:14,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-17 21:53:14,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-17 21:53:14,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-17 21:53:14,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-17 21:53:14,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-17 21:53:14,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-17 21:53:14,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-17 21:53:14,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-17 21:53:14,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-17 21:53:14,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-17 21:53:14,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-17 21:53:14,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-17 21:53:14,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-17 21:53:14,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-17 21:53:14,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-17 21:53:14,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-17 21:53:14,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-17 21:53:14,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-17 21:53:14,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-17 21:53:14,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-17 21:53:14,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-17 21:53:14,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-17 21:53:14,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-17 21:53:14,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-17 21:53:14,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-17 21:53:14,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-17 21:53:14,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-17 21:53:14,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-17 21:53:14,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-17 21:53:14,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-17 21:53:14,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-17 21:53:14,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-17 21:53:14,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-17 21:53:14,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-17 21:53:14,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-17 21:53:14,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-17 21:53:14,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-17 21:53:14,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-17 21:53:14,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-17 21:53:14,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-17 21:53:14,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-17 21:53:14,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-17 21:53:14,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-17 21:53:14,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-17 21:53:14,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-17 21:53:14,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-17 21:53:14,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-17 21:53:14,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-17 21:53:14,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-17 21:53:14,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-17 21:53:14,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-17 21:53:14,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-17 21:53:14,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-17 21:53:14,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-17 21:53:14,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-17 21:53:14,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-17 21:53:14,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-17 21:53:14,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-17 21:53:14,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-17 21:53:14,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-17 21:53:14,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-17 21:53:14,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-17 21:53:14,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-17 21:53:14,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-17 21:53:14,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-17 21:53:14,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-17 21:53:14,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-17 21:53:14,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-17 21:53:14,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-17 21:53:14,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-17 21:53:14,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-17 21:53:14,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-17 21:53:14,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-17 21:53:14,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-17 21:53:14,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-17 21:53:14,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-17 21:53:14,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-17 21:53:14,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-17 21:53:14,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-17 21:53:14,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-17 21:53:14,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-17 21:53:14,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-17 21:53:14,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-17 21:53:14,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-17 21:53:14,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-17 21:53:14,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-17 21:53:14,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-17 21:53:14,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-17 21:53:14,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-17 21:53:14,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-17 21:53:14,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-17 21:53:14,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-17 21:53:14,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-17 21:53:14,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-17 21:53:14,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-17 21:53:14,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-17 21:53:14,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-17 21:53:14,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-17 21:53:14,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-17 21:53:14,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-17 21:53:14,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,566 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table13) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,566 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table14
2023-07-17 21:53:14,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv871358531=369, srv64697211=312, srv653261481=314, srv1778141916=154, srv716510755=323, srv372169288=255, srv568235512=298, srv710229516=322, srv537137712=293, srv1682791519=131, srv642353994=311, srv1046656068=13, srv993792848=391, srv1202667070=39, srv99567927=392, srv1607947050=111, srv1677371877=129, srv1763526149=150, srv1763378353=149, srv531263272=289, srv448398842=270, srv802808934=348, srv77960001=340, srv453521623=271, srv162773041=114, srv563606057=295, srv1659238910=122, srv1279307656=55, srv1914255334=183, srv1296605582=61, srv2131597846=222, srv1375359355=72, srv1405269336=79, srv175680261=147, srv282211488=242, srv1412891098=82, srv375712549=257, srv191234370=182, srv1574132168=106, srv1853511149=168, srv617306884=307, srv268601623=238, srv1400099806=78, srv477381292=275, srv1279442050=56, srv535853198=292, srv1767480590=152, srv2100700333=211, srv1187847151=37, srv791064637=345, srv74478935=330, srv1206084762=41, srv1497856295=97, srv897884865=377, srv398014971=261, srv786136704=342, srv1429879791=86, srv1201763981=38, srv1415213844=84, srv302220908=243, srv156683359=105, srv1974497084=192, srv535358845=291, srv627763604=308, srv732106437=326, srv1679724304=130, srv576770232=299, srv478480013=276, srv1237250370=47, srv1169018295=34, srv32320833=248, srv594880186=304, srv216306370=225, srv656484240=315, srv818754908=354, srv1321058011=63, srv1256345927=52, srv1670847243=126, srv1515243164=99, srv1781378955=156, srv508388209=278, srv1910886192=180, srv1718898730=139, srv772274482=337, srv1433624807=87, srv848605385=359, srv2107957639=212, srv270591905=240, srv2126706298=219, srv2080681743=209, srv1683990934=132, srv11526364=28, srv761020484=334, srv1720507603=141, srv266276730=236, srv935213051=386, srv923440665=383, srv1911104834=181, srv1944131651=187, srv1162841146=30, srv1921230216=185, srv319459319=247, srv1168022226=33, srv57689659=300, srv716533901=324, srv1255156178=50, srv441379967=267, srv806979625=350, srv788255577=344, srv976533744=389, srv1317853355=62, srv1491073587=96, srv777865249=339, srv2130226580=221, srv873230355=370, srv971370780=388, srv2008207413=197, srv989150800=390, srv737980208=328, srv862088563=363, srv1716783669=138, srv1801293056=160, srv1363984373=68, srv515711115=282, srv1378945327=75, srv17002515=136, srv853498273=361, srv1825292480=165, srv2124576425=217, srv1889349340=175, srv527691188=286, srv1226737728=44, srv1781498156=157, srv104267960=11, srv1663644309=124, srv1672213768=127, srv740402944=329, srv555807163=294, srv566277037=296, srv734882045=327, srv1143683685=27, srv1021400966=5, srv694407347=319, srv1626790310=113, srv303328507=244, srv1869166689=171, srv781623755=341, srv40741117=264, srv1958265988=190, srv592380483=303, srv483565354=277, srv1531731329=100, srv359746409=253, srv1271131029=54, srv1007512250=2, srv1783696565=158, srv1284150263=57, srv1648846971=118, srv120365207=40, srv263085176=235, srv535080964=290, srv824739010=357, srv744793832=331, srv1073394883=18, srv1113186104=23, srv1370321362=69, srv328204461=249, srv1604342762=109, srv266460489=237, srv313806624=245, srv1473408823=93, srv865692144=366, srv42814401=265, srv104065318=10, srv1599236554=108, srv1476834435=94, srv1673452142=128, srv716892727=325, srv1501773847=98, srv791504502=346, srv367902453=254, srv254349567=232, srv2126102976=218, srv252714068=231, srv916506189=380, srv687320190=318, srv1000433998=0, srv51396503=281, srv648464134=313, srv908419423=379, srv204022732=200, srv1901650254=177, srv200342397=196, srv765841762=335, srv1849125656=167, srv235281774=226, srv2137298641=224, srv517347076=283, srv1687711069=135, srv800105834=347, srv1609917009=112, srv1038797815=9, srv863216619=365, srv921796978=382, srv895924009=376, srv319002955=246, srv611122413=305, srv1942590787=186, srv529333113=288, srv1053973741=14, srv1988512138=194, srv1037112526=8, srv442327402=268, srv2062351281=204, srv1240518778=48, srv471289019=274, srv1857090224=170, srv1543025253=101, srv1915241294=184, srv238420451=228, srv1747796150=145, srv1101668258=21, srv1437034663=88, srv1173449481=35, srv582652595=301, srv1739043021=144, srv1733173130=143, srv465824154=272, srv14463216=91, srv1720161153=140, srv1549403995=102, srv235920151=227, srv1909060246=179, srv527988350=287, srv1801762669=161, srv89501442=375, srv442994824=269, srv1414012241=83, srv165153258=121, srv1766333515=151, srv2063438865=205, srv1071671801=17, srv1638570398=116, srv1035353226=7, srv1856921753=169, srv1887444158=173, srv1897306674=176, srv1255718022=51, srv1260078897=53, srv1372945218=70, srv1163715139=31, srv175471358=146, srv1558656747=104, srv1463869996=92, srv124825865=49, srv1142495625=26, srv1397803774=77, srv1644508836=117, srv1807320536=162, srv1165273546=32, srv1650978005=120, srv1374260725=71, srv2065239646=206, srv1685737274=134, srv878340336=371, srv329463090=250, srv2112675912=213, srv1378293943=74, srv787532288=343, srv1292867420=59, srv519831391=285, srv1002018470=1, srv822141051=356, srv1229740495=45, srv706370370=321, srv255741565=233, srv1177018836=36, srv1223505925=43, srv745532463=332, srv1820836786=163, srv2127145828=220, srv2124524081=216, srv665150476=316, srv2132621880=223, srv2051928856=203, srv1903063797=178, srv881186303=373, srv1758974023=148, srv270549378=239, srv2014789268=198, srv1663469360=123, srv1331983035=65, srv1768940632=153, srv2084732799=210, srv1043044287=12, srv630246195=309, srv86319792=364, srv37305654=256, srv1650394019=119, srv1888093001=174, srv512441512=280, srv813969264=352, srv277288989=241, srv2017714321=199, srv1410469782=81, srv751917673=333, srv1443060804=89, srv1997063872=195, srv404426071=263, srv1443287861=90, srv695697141=320, srv636958174=310, srv1105584096=22, srv583005569=302, srv92523166=384, srv330226906=251, srv1684865692=133, srv381463497=258, srv567942525=297, srv1010403208=3, srv881516937=374, srv140693587=80, srv1872213858=172, srv262210172=234, srv846799674=358, srv851169364=360, srv880017865=372, srv129190288=58, srv401606217=262, srv669535820=317, srv1325384866=64, srv1377673856=73, srv1416276025=85, srv430431276=266, srv81513922=353, srv2044458062=201, srv2118166427=214, srv1665530216=125, srv2045587532=202, srv1824773168=164, srv2071913725=208, srv1295499145=60, srv1780304939=155, srv612277490=306, srv102508625=6, srv1637539828=115, srv820424989=355, srv50966795=279, srv1950402166=188, srv1207208580=42, srv1057648579=16, srv1084295726=20, srv39165764=260, srv959379519=387, srv2066402828=207, srv1556810592=103, srv1232731779=46, srv1606144164=110, srv1487275322=95, srv519310224=284, srv775221203=338, srv1079168923=19, srv1957834842=189, srv866525142=367, srv243907419=229, srv248553307=230, srv344122075=252, srv467461515=273, srv805609280=349, srv1018507425=4, srv1827511993=166, srv1704639485=137, srv855754935=362, srv1057024901=15, srv1116429721=24, srv927375731=385, srv1383836323=76, srv1584407048=107, srv809779157=351, srv1786622589=159, srv869541705=368, srv1123072042=25, srv1726136626=142, srv135800579=67, srv1958676591=191, srv390748718=259, srv907223095=378, srv76871917=336, srv1160170031=29, srv2119727728=215, srv918100507=381, srv1352063642=66, srv1975716907=193} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-17 21:53:14,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-17 21:53:14,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-17 21:53:14,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-17 21:53:14,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-17 21:53:14,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-17 21:53:14,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-17 21:53:14,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-17 21:53:14,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-17 21:53:14,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-17 21:53:14,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-17 21:53:14,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-17 21:53:14,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-17 21:53:14,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-17 21:53:14,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-17 21:53:14,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-17 21:53:14,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-17 21:53:14,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-17 21:53:14,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-17 21:53:14,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-17 21:53:14,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-17 21:53:14,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-17 21:53:14,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-17 21:53:14,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-17 21:53:14,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-17 21:53:14,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-17 21:53:14,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-17 21:53:14,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-17 21:53:14,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-17 21:53:14,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-17 21:53:14,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-17 21:53:14,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-17 21:53:14,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-17 21:53:14,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-17 21:53:14,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-17 21:53:14,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-17 21:53:14,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-17 21:53:14,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-17 21:53:14,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-17 21:53:14,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-17 21:53:14,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-17 21:53:14,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-17 21:53:14,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-17 21:53:14,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-17 21:53:14,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-17 21:53:14,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-17 21:53:14,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-17 21:53:14,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-17 21:53:14,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-17 21:53:14,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-17 21:53:14,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-17 21:53:14,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-17 21:53:14,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-17 21:53:14,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-17 21:53:14,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-17 21:53:14,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-17 21:53:14,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-17 21:53:14,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-17 21:53:14,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-17 21:53:14,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-17 21:53:14,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-17 21:53:14,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-17 21:53:14,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-17 21:53:14,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-17 21:53:14,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-17 21:53:14,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-17 21:53:14,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-17 21:53:14,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-17 21:53:14,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-17 21:53:14,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-17 21:53:14,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-17 21:53:14,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-17 21:53:14,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-17 21:53:14,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-17 21:53:14,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-17 21:53:14,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-17 21:53:14,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-17 21:53:14,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-17 21:53:14,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-17 21:53:14,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-17 21:53:14,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-17 21:53:14,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-17 21:53:14,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-17 21:53:14,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-17 21:53:14,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-17 21:53:14,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-17 21:53:14,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-17 21:53:14,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-17 21:53:14,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-17 21:53:14,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-17 21:53:14,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-17 21:53:14,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-17 21:53:14,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-17 21:53:14,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-17 21:53:14,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-17 21:53:14,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-17 21:53:14,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-17 21:53:14,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-17 21:53:14,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-17 21:53:14,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-17 21:53:14,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-17 21:53:14,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-17 21:53:14,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-17 21:53:14,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-17 21:53:14,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-17 21:53:14,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-17 21:53:14,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-17 21:53:14,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-17 21:53:14,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-17 21:53:14,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-17 21:53:14,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-17 21:53:14,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-17 21:53:14,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-17 21:53:14,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-17 21:53:14,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-17 21:53:14,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-17 21:53:14,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-17 21:53:14,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-17 21:53:14,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-17 21:53:14,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-17 21:53:14,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-17 21:53:14,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-17 21:53:14,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-17 21:53:14,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-17 21:53:14,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-17 21:53:14,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-17 21:53:14,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-17 21:53:14,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-17 21:53:14,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-17 21:53:14,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-17 21:53:14,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-17 21:53:14,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-17 21:53:14,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-17 21:53:14,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-17 21:53:14,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-17 21:53:14,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-17 21:53:14,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-17 21:53:14,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-17 21:53:14,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-17 21:53:14,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-17 21:53:14,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-17 21:53:14,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-17 21:53:14,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-17 21:53:14,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-17 21:53:14,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-17 21:53:14,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-17 21:53:14,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-17 21:53:14,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-17 21:53:14,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-17 21:53:14,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-17 21:53:14,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-17 21:53:14,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-17 21:53:14,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-17 21:53:14,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-17 21:53:14,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-17 21:53:14,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-17 21:53:14,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-17 21:53:14,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-17 21:53:14,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-17 21:53:14,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-17 21:53:14,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-17 21:53:14,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-17 21:53:14,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-17 21:53:14,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-17 21:53:14,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-17 21:53:14,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-17 21:53:14,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-17 21:53:14,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-17 21:53:14,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-17 21:53:14,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-17 21:53:14,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-17 21:53:14,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-17 21:53:14,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-17 21:53:14,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-17 21:53:14,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-17 21:53:14,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-17 21:53:14,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-17 21:53:14,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-17 21:53:14,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-17 21:53:14,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-17 21:53:14,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-17 21:53:14,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-17 21:53:14,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-17 21:53:14,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-17 21:53:14,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-17 21:53:14,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-17 21:53:14,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-17 21:53:14,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-17 21:53:14,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-17 21:53:14,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-17 21:53:14,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-17 21:53:14,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-17 21:53:14,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-17 21:53:14,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-17 21:53:14,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-17 21:53:14,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-17 21:53:14,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-17 21:53:14,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-17 21:53:14,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-17 21:53:14,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-17 21:53:14,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-17 21:53:14,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-17 21:53:14,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-17 21:53:14,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-17 21:53:14,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-17 21:53:14,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-17 21:53:14,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-17 21:53:14,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-17 21:53:14,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-17 21:53:14,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-17 21:53:14,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-17 21:53:14,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-17 21:53:14,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-17 21:53:14,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-17 21:53:14,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-17 21:53:14,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-17 21:53:14,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-17 21:53:14,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-17 21:53:14,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-17 21:53:14,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-17 21:53:14,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-17 21:53:14,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-17 21:53:14,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-17 21:53:14,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-17 21:53:14,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-17 21:53:14,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-17 21:53:14,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-17 21:53:14,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-17 21:53:14,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-17 21:53:14,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-17 21:53:14,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-17 21:53:14,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-17 21:53:14,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-17 21:53:14,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-17 21:53:14,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-17 21:53:14,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-17 21:53:14,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-17 21:53:14,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-17 21:53:14,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-17 21:53:14,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-17 21:53:14,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-17 21:53:14,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-17 21:53:14,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-17 21:53:14,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-17 21:53:14,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-17 21:53:14,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-17 21:53:14,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-17 21:53:14,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-17 21:53:14,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-17 21:53:14,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-17 21:53:14,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-17 21:53:14,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-17 21:53:14,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-17 21:53:14,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-17 21:53:14,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-17 21:53:14,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-17 21:53:14,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-17 21:53:14,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-17 21:53:14,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-17 21:53:14,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-17 21:53:14,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-17 21:53:14,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-17 21:53:14,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-17 21:53:14,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-17 21:53:14,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-17 21:53:14,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-17 21:53:14,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-17 21:53:14,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-17 21:53:14,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-17 21:53:14,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-17 21:53:14,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-17 21:53:14,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-17 21:53:14,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-17 21:53:14,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-17 21:53:14,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-17 21:53:14,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-17 21:53:14,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-17 21:53:14,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-17 21:53:14,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-17 21:53:14,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-17 21:53:14,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-17 21:53:14,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-17 21:53:14,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-17 21:53:14,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-17 21:53:14,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-17 21:53:14,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-17 21:53:14,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-17 21:53:14,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-17 21:53:14,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-17 21:53:14,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-17 21:53:14,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-17 21:53:14,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-17 21:53:14,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-17 21:53:14,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-17 21:53:14,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-17 21:53:14,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-17 21:53:14,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-17 21:53:14,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-17 21:53:14,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-17 21:53:14,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-17 21:53:14,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-17 21:53:14,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-17 21:53:14,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-17 21:53:14,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-17 21:53:14,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-17 21:53:14,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-17 21:53:14,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-17 21:53:14,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-17 21:53:14,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-17 21:53:14,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-17 21:53:14,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-17 21:53:14,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-17 21:53:14,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-17 21:53:14,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-17 21:53:14,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-17 21:53:14,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-17 21:53:14,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-17 21:53:14,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-17 21:53:14,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-17 21:53:14,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-17 21:53:14,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-17 21:53:14,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-17 21:53:14,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-17 21:53:14,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-17 21:53:14,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-17 21:53:14,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-17 21:53:14,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-17 21:53:14,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-17 21:53:14,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-17 21:53:14,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-17 21:53:14,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-17 21:53:14,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-17 21:53:14,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-17 21:53:14,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-17 21:53:14,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-17 21:53:14,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-17 21:53:14,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-17 21:53:14,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-17 21:53:14,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-17 21:53:14,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-17 21:53:14,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-17 21:53:14,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-17 21:53:14,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-17 21:53:14,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-17 21:53:14,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-17 21:53:14,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-17 21:53:14,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-17 21:53:14,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-17 21:53:14,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-17 21:53:14,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-17 21:53:14,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-17 21:53:14,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-17 21:53:14,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-17 21:53:14,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-17 21:53:14,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-17 21:53:14,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-17 21:53:14,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-17 21:53:14,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-17 21:53:14,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-17 21:53:14,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-17 21:53:14,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-17 21:53:14,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-17 21:53:14,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-17 21:53:14,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-17 21:53:14,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-17 21:53:14,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-17 21:53:14,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-17 21:53:14,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-17 21:53:14,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-17 21:53:14,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-17 21:53:14,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-17 21:53:14,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-17 21:53:14,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-17 21:53:14,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-17 21:53:14,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-17 21:53:14,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-17 21:53:14,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-17 21:53:14,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-17 21:53:14,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-17 21:53:14,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-17 21:53:14,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-17 21:53:14,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-17 21:53:14,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-17 21:53:14,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,587 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table14) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,587 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table15
2023-07-17 21:53:14,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv871358531=369, srv64697211=312, srv653261481=314, srv1778141916=154, srv716510755=323, srv372169288=255, srv568235512=298, srv710229516=322, srv537137712=293, srv1682791519=131, srv642353994=311, srv1046656068=13, srv993792848=391, srv1202667070=39, srv99567927=392, srv1607947050=111, srv1677371877=129, srv1763526149=150, srv1763378353=149, srv531263272=289, srv448398842=270, srv802808934=348, srv77960001=340, srv453521623=271, srv162773041=114, srv563606057=295, srv1659238910=122, srv1279307656=55, srv1914255334=183, srv1296605582=61, srv2131597846=222, srv1375359355=72, srv1405269336=79, srv175680261=147, srv282211488=242, srv1412891098=82, srv375712549=257, srv191234370=182, srv1574132168=106, srv1853511149=168, srv617306884=307, srv268601623=238, srv1400099806=78, srv477381292=275, srv1279442050=56, srv535853198=292, srv1767480590=152, srv2100700333=211, srv1187847151=37, srv791064637=345, srv74478935=330, srv1206084762=41, srv1497856295=97, srv897884865=377, srv398014971=261, srv786136704=342, srv1429879791=86, srv1201763981=38, srv1415213844=84, srv302220908=243, srv156683359=105, srv1974497084=192, srv535358845=291, srv627763604=308, srv732106437=326, srv1679724304=130, srv576770232=299, srv478480013=276, srv1237250370=47, srv1169018295=34, srv32320833=248, srv594880186=304, srv216306370=225, srv656484240=315, srv818754908=354, srv1321058011=63, srv1256345927=52, srv1670847243=126, srv1515243164=99, srv1781378955=156, srv508388209=278, srv1910886192=180, srv1718898730=139, srv772274482=337, srv1433624807=87, srv848605385=359, srv2107957639=212, srv270591905=240, srv2126706298=219, srv2080681743=209, srv1683990934=132, srv11526364=28, srv761020484=334, srv1720507603=141, srv266276730=236, srv935213051=386, srv923440665=383, srv1911104834=181, srv1944131651=187, srv1162841146=30, srv1921230216=185, srv319459319=247, srv1168022226=33, srv57689659=300, srv716533901=324, srv1255156178=50, srv441379967=267, srv806979625=350, srv788255577=344, srv976533744=389, srv1317853355=62, srv1491073587=96, srv777865249=339, srv2130226580=221, srv873230355=370, srv971370780=388, srv2008207413=197, srv989150800=390, srv737980208=328, srv862088563=363, srv1716783669=138, srv1801293056=160, srv1363984373=68, srv515711115=282, srv1378945327=75, srv17002515=136, srv853498273=361, srv1825292480=165, srv2124576425=217, srv1889349340=175, srv527691188=286, srv1226737728=44, srv1781498156=157, srv104267960=11, srv1663644309=124, srv1672213768=127, srv740402944=329, srv555807163=294, srv566277037=296, srv734882045=327, srv1143683685=27, srv1021400966=5, srv694407347=319, srv1626790310=113, srv303328507=244, srv1869166689=171, srv781623755=341, srv40741117=264, srv1958265988=190, srv592380483=303, srv483565354=277, srv1531731329=100, srv359746409=253, srv1271131029=54, srv1007512250=2, srv1783696565=158, srv1284150263=57, srv1648846971=118, srv120365207=40, srv263085176=235, srv535080964=290, srv824739010=357, srv744793832=331, srv1073394883=18, srv1113186104=23, srv1370321362=69, srv328204461=249, srv1604342762=109, srv266460489=237, srv313806624=245, srv1473408823=93, srv865692144=366, srv42814401=265, srv104065318=10, srv1599236554=108, srv1476834435=94, srv1673452142=128, srv716892727=325, srv1501773847=98, srv791504502=346, srv367902453=254, srv254349567=232, srv2126102976=218, srv252714068=231, srv916506189=380, srv687320190=318, srv1000433998=0, srv51396503=281, srv648464134=313, srv908419423=379, srv204022732=200, srv1901650254=177, srv200342397=196, srv765841762=335, srv1849125656=167, srv235281774=226, srv2137298641=224, srv517347076=283, srv1687711069=135, srv800105834=347, srv1609917009=112, srv1038797815=9, srv863216619=365, srv921796978=382, srv895924009=376, srv319002955=246, srv611122413=305, srv1942590787=186, srv529333113=288, srv1053973741=14, srv1988512138=194, srv1037112526=8, srv442327402=268, srv2062351281=204, srv1240518778=48, srv471289019=274, srv1857090224=170, srv1543025253=101, srv1915241294=184, srv238420451=228, srv1747796150=145, srv1101668258=21, srv1437034663=88, srv1173449481=35, srv582652595=301, srv1739043021=144, srv1733173130=143, srv465824154=272, srv14463216=91, srv1720161153=140, srv1549403995=102, srv235920151=227, srv1909060246=179, srv527988350=287, srv1801762669=161, srv89501442=375, srv442994824=269, srv1414012241=83, srv165153258=121, srv1766333515=151, srv2063438865=205, srv1071671801=17, srv1638570398=116, srv1035353226=7, srv1856921753=169, srv1887444158=173, srv1897306674=176, srv1255718022=51, srv1260078897=53, srv1372945218=70, srv1163715139=31, srv175471358=146, srv1558656747=104, srv1463869996=92, srv124825865=49, srv1142495625=26, srv1397803774=77, srv1644508836=117, srv1807320536=162, srv1165273546=32, srv1650978005=120, srv1374260725=71, srv2065239646=206, srv1685737274=134, srv878340336=371, srv329463090=250, srv2112675912=213, srv1378293943=74, srv787532288=343, srv1292867420=59, srv519831391=285, srv1002018470=1, srv822141051=356, srv1229740495=45, srv706370370=321, srv255741565=233, srv1177018836=36, srv1223505925=43, srv745532463=332, srv1820836786=163, srv2127145828=220, srv2124524081=216, srv665150476=316, srv2132621880=223, srv2051928856=203, srv1903063797=178, srv881186303=373, srv1758974023=148, srv270549378=239, srv2014789268=198, srv1663469360=123, srv1331983035=65, srv1768940632=153, srv2084732799=210, srv1043044287=12, srv630246195=309, srv86319792=364, srv37305654=256, srv1650394019=119, srv1888093001=174, srv512441512=280, srv813969264=352, srv277288989=241, srv2017714321=199, srv1410469782=81, srv751917673=333, srv1443060804=89, srv1997063872=195, srv404426071=263, srv1443287861=90, srv695697141=320, srv636958174=310, srv1105584096=22, srv583005569=302, srv92523166=384, srv330226906=251, srv1684865692=133, srv381463497=258, srv567942525=297, srv1010403208=3, srv881516937=374, srv140693587=80, srv1872213858=172, srv262210172=234, srv846799674=358, srv851169364=360, srv880017865=372, srv129190288=58, srv401606217=262, srv669535820=317, srv1325384866=64, srv1377673856=73, srv1416276025=85, srv430431276=266, srv81513922=353, srv2044458062=201, srv2118166427=214, srv1665530216=125, srv2045587532=202, srv1824773168=164, srv2071913725=208, srv1295499145=60, srv1780304939=155, srv612277490=306, srv102508625=6, srv1637539828=115, srv820424989=355, srv50966795=279, srv1950402166=188, srv1207208580=42, srv1057648579=16, srv1084295726=20, srv39165764=260, srv959379519=387, srv2066402828=207, srv1556810592=103, srv1232731779=46, srv1606144164=110, srv1487275322=95, srv519310224=284, srv775221203=338, srv1079168923=19, srv1957834842=189, srv866525142=367, srv243907419=229, srv248553307=230, srv344122075=252, srv467461515=273, srv805609280=349, srv1018507425=4, srv1827511993=166, srv1704639485=137, srv855754935=362, srv1057024901=15, srv1116429721=24, srv927375731=385, srv1383836323=76, srv1584407048=107, srv809779157=351, srv1786622589=159, srv869541705=368, srv1123072042=25, srv1726136626=142, srv135800579=67, srv1958676591=191, srv390748718=259, srv907223095=378, srv76871917=336, srv1160170031=29, srv2119727728=215, srv918100507=381, srv1352063642=66, srv1975716907=193} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-17 21:53:14,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-17 21:53:14,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-17 21:53:14,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-17 21:53:14,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-17 21:53:14,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-17 21:53:14,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-17 21:53:14,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-17 21:53:14,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-17 21:53:14,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-17 21:53:14,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-17 21:53:14,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-17 21:53:14,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-17 21:53:14,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-17 21:53:14,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-17 21:53:14,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-17 21:53:14,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-17 21:53:14,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-17 21:53:14,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-17 21:53:14,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-17 21:53:14,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-17 21:53:14,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-17 21:53:14,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-17 21:53:14,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-17 21:53:14,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-17 21:53:14,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-17 21:53:14,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-17 21:53:14,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-17 21:53:14,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-17 21:53:14,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-17 21:53:14,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-17 21:53:14,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-17 21:53:14,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-17 21:53:14,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-17 21:53:14,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-17 21:53:14,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-17 21:53:14,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-17 21:53:14,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-17 21:53:14,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-17 21:53:14,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-17 21:53:14,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-17 21:53:14,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-17 21:53:14,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-17 21:53:14,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-17 21:53:14,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-17 21:53:14,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-17 21:53:14,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-17 21:53:14,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-17 21:53:14,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-17 21:53:14,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-17 21:53:14,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-17 21:53:14,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-17 21:53:14,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-17 21:53:14,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-17 21:53:14,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-17 21:53:14,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-17 21:53:14,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-17 21:53:14,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-17 21:53:14,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-17 21:53:14,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-17 21:53:14,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-17 21:53:14,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-17 21:53:14,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-17 21:53:14,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-17 21:53:14,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-17 21:53:14,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-17 21:53:14,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-17 21:53:14,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-17 21:53:14,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-17 21:53:14,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-17 21:53:14,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-17 21:53:14,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-17 21:53:14,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-17 21:53:14,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-17 21:53:14,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-17 21:53:14,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-17 21:53:14,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-17 21:53:14,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-17 21:53:14,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-17 21:53:14,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-17 21:53:14,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-17 21:53:14,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-17 21:53:14,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-17 21:53:14,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-17 21:53:14,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-17 21:53:14,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-17 21:53:14,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-17 21:53:14,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-17 21:53:14,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-17 21:53:14,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-17 21:53:14,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-17 21:53:14,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-17 21:53:14,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-17 21:53:14,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-17 21:53:14,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-17 21:53:14,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-17 21:53:14,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-17 21:53:14,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-17 21:53:14,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-17 21:53:14,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-17 21:53:14,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-17 21:53:14,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-17 21:53:14,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-17 21:53:14,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-17 21:53:14,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-17 21:53:14,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-17 21:53:14,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-17 21:53:14,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-17 21:53:14,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-17 21:53:14,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-17 21:53:14,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-17 21:53:14,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-17 21:53:14,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-17 21:53:14,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-17 21:53:14,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-17 21:53:14,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-17 21:53:14,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-17 21:53:14,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-17 21:53:14,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-17 21:53:14,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-17 21:53:14,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-17 21:53:14,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-17 21:53:14,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-17 21:53:14,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-17 21:53:14,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-17 21:53:14,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-17 21:53:14,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-17 21:53:14,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-17 21:53:14,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-17 21:53:14,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-17 21:53:14,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-17 21:53:14,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-17 21:53:14,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-17 21:53:14,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-17 21:53:14,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-17 21:53:14,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-17 21:53:14,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-17 21:53:14,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-17 21:53:14,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-17 21:53:14,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-17 21:53:14,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-17 21:53:14,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-17 21:53:14,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-17 21:53:14,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-17 21:53:14,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-17 21:53:14,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-17 21:53:14,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-17 21:53:14,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-17 21:53:14,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-17 21:53:14,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-17 21:53:14,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-17 21:53:14,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-17 21:53:14,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-17 21:53:14,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-17 21:53:14,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-17 21:53:14,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-17 21:53:14,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-17 21:53:14,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-17 21:53:14,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-17 21:53:14,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-17 21:53:14,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-17 21:53:14,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-17 21:53:14,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-17 21:53:14,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-17 21:53:14,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-17 21:53:14,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-17 21:53:14,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-17 21:53:14,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-17 21:53:14,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-17 21:53:14,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-17 21:53:14,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-17 21:53:14,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-17 21:53:14,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-17 21:53:14,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-17 21:53:14,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-17 21:53:14,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-17 21:53:14,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-17 21:53:14,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-17 21:53:14,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-17 21:53:14,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-17 21:53:14,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-17 21:53:14,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-17 21:53:14,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-17 21:53:14,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-17 21:53:14,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-17 21:53:14,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-17 21:53:14,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-17 21:53:14,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-17 21:53:14,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-17 21:53:14,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-17 21:53:14,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-17 21:53:14,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-17 21:53:14,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-17 21:53:14,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-17 21:53:14,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-17 21:53:14,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-17 21:53:14,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-17 21:53:14,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-17 21:53:14,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-17 21:53:14,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-17 21:53:14,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-17 21:53:14,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-17 21:53:14,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-17 21:53:14,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-17 21:53:14,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-17 21:53:14,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-17 21:53:14,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-17 21:53:14,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-17 21:53:14,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-17 21:53:14,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-17 21:53:14,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-17 21:53:14,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-17 21:53:14,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-17 21:53:14,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-17 21:53:14,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-17 21:53:14,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-17 21:53:14,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-17 21:53:14,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-17 21:53:14,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-17 21:53:14,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-17 21:53:14,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-17 21:53:14,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-17 21:53:14,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-17 21:53:14,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-17 21:53:14,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-17 21:53:14,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-17 21:53:14,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-17 21:53:14,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-17 21:53:14,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-17 21:53:14,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-17 21:53:14,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-17 21:53:14,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-17 21:53:14,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-17 21:53:14,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-17 21:53:14,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-17 21:53:14,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-17 21:53:14,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-17 21:53:14,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-17 21:53:14,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-17 21:53:14,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-17 21:53:14,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-17 21:53:14,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-17 21:53:14,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-17 21:53:14,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-17 21:53:14,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-17 21:53:14,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-17 21:53:14,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-17 21:53:14,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-17 21:53:14,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-17 21:53:14,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-17 21:53:14,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-17 21:53:14,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-17 21:53:14,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-17 21:53:14,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-17 21:53:14,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-17 21:53:14,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-17 21:53:14,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-17 21:53:14,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-17 21:53:14,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-17 21:53:14,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-17 21:53:14,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-17 21:53:14,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-17 21:53:14,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-17 21:53:14,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-17 21:53:14,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-17 21:53:14,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-17 21:53:14,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-17 21:53:14,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-17 21:53:14,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-17 21:53:14,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-17 21:53:14,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-17 21:53:14,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-17 21:53:14,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-17 21:53:14,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-17 21:53:14,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-17 21:53:14,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-17 21:53:14,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-17 21:53:14,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-17 21:53:14,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-17 21:53:14,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-17 21:53:14,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-17 21:53:14,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-17 21:53:14,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-17 21:53:14,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-17 21:53:14,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-17 21:53:14,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-17 21:53:14,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-17 21:53:14,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-17 21:53:14,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-17 21:53:14,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-17 21:53:14,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-17 21:53:14,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-17 21:53:14,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-17 21:53:14,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-17 21:53:14,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-17 21:53:14,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-17 21:53:14,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-17 21:53:14,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-17 21:53:14,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-17 21:53:14,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-17 21:53:14,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-17 21:53:14,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-17 21:53:14,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-17 21:53:14,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-17 21:53:14,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-17 21:53:14,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-17 21:53:14,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-17 21:53:14,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-17 21:53:14,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-17 21:53:14,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-17 21:53:14,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-17 21:53:14,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-17 21:53:14,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-17 21:53:14,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-17 21:53:14,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-17 21:53:14,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-17 21:53:14,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-17 21:53:14,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-17 21:53:14,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-17 21:53:14,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-17 21:53:14,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-17 21:53:14,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-17 21:53:14,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-17 21:53:14,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-17 21:53:14,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-17 21:53:14,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-17 21:53:14,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-17 21:53:14,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-17 21:53:14,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-17 21:53:14,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-17 21:53:14,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-17 21:53:14,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-17 21:53:14,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-17 21:53:14,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-17 21:53:14,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-17 21:53:14,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-17 21:53:14,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-17 21:53:14,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-17 21:53:14,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-17 21:53:14,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-17 21:53:14,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-17 21:53:14,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-17 21:53:14,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-17 21:53:14,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-17 21:53:14,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-17 21:53:14,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-17 21:53:14,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-17 21:53:14,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-17 21:53:14,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-17 21:53:14,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-17 21:53:14,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-17 21:53:14,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-17 21:53:14,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-17 21:53:14,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-17 21:53:14,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-17 21:53:14,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-17 21:53:14,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-17 21:53:14,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-17 21:53:14,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-17 21:53:14,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-17 21:53:14,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-17 21:53:14,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-17 21:53:14,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-17 21:53:14,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-17 21:53:14,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-17 21:53:14,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-17 21:53:14,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-17 21:53:14,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-17 21:53:14,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-17 21:53:14,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-17 21:53:14,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-17 21:53:14,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-17 21:53:14,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-17 21:53:14,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-17 21:53:14,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-17 21:53:14,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-17 21:53:14,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-17 21:53:14,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-17 21:53:14,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-17 21:53:14,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-17 21:53:14,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-17 21:53:14,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-17 21:53:14,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-17 21:53:14,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,609 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table15) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,609 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table16
2023-07-17 21:53:14,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv871358531=369, srv64697211=312, srv653261481=314, srv1778141916=154, srv716510755=323, srv372169288=255, srv568235512=298, srv710229516=322, srv537137712=293, srv1682791519=131, srv642353994=311, srv1046656068=13, srv993792848=391, srv1202667070=39, srv99567927=392, srv1607947050=111, srv1677371877=129, srv1763526149=150, srv1763378353=149, srv531263272=289, srv448398842=270, srv802808934=348, srv77960001=340, srv453521623=271, srv162773041=114, srv563606057=295, srv1659238910=122, srv1279307656=55, srv1914255334=183, srv1296605582=61, srv2131597846=222, srv1375359355=72, srv1405269336=79, srv175680261=147, srv282211488=242, srv1412891098=82, srv375712549=257, srv191234370=182, srv1574132168=106, srv1853511149=168, srv617306884=307, srv268601623=238, srv1400099806=78, srv477381292=275, srv1279442050=56, srv535853198=292, srv1767480590=152, srv2100700333=211, srv1187847151=37, srv791064637=345, srv74478935=330, srv1206084762=41, srv1497856295=97, srv897884865=377, srv398014971=261, srv786136704=342, srv1429879791=86, srv1201763981=38, srv1415213844=84, srv302220908=243, srv156683359=105, srv1974497084=192, srv535358845=291, srv627763604=308, srv732106437=326, srv1679724304=130, srv576770232=299, srv478480013=276, srv1237250370=47, srv1169018295=34, srv32320833=248, srv594880186=304, srv216306370=225, srv656484240=315, srv818754908=354, srv1321058011=63, srv1256345927=52, srv1670847243=126, srv1515243164=99, srv1781378955=156, srv508388209=278, srv1910886192=180, srv1718898730=139, srv772274482=337, srv1433624807=87, srv848605385=359, srv2107957639=212, srv270591905=240, srv2126706298=219, srv2080681743=209, srv1683990934=132, srv11526364=28, srv761020484=334, srv1720507603=141, srv266276730=236, srv935213051=386, srv923440665=383, srv1911104834=181, srv1944131651=187, srv1162841146=30, srv1921230216=185, srv319459319=247, srv1168022226=33, srv57689659=300, srv716533901=324, srv1255156178=50, srv441379967=267, srv806979625=350, srv788255577=344, srv976533744=389, srv1317853355=62, srv1491073587=96, srv777865249=339, srv2130226580=221, srv873230355=370, srv971370780=388, srv2008207413=197, srv989150800=390, srv737980208=328, srv862088563=363, srv1716783669=138, srv1801293056=160, srv1363984373=68, srv515711115=282, srv1378945327=75, srv17002515=136, srv853498273=361, srv1825292480=165, srv2124576425=217, srv1889349340=175, srv527691188=286, srv1226737728=44, srv1781498156=157, srv104267960=11, srv1663644309=124, srv1672213768=127, srv740402944=329, srv555807163=294, srv566277037=296, srv734882045=327, srv1143683685=27, srv1021400966=5, srv694407347=319, srv1626790310=113, srv303328507=244, srv1869166689=171, srv781623755=341, srv40741117=264, srv1958265988=190, srv592380483=303, srv483565354=277, srv1531731329=100, srv359746409=253, srv1271131029=54, srv1007512250=2, srv1783696565=158, srv1284150263=57, srv1648846971=118, srv120365207=40, srv263085176=235, srv535080964=290, srv824739010=357, srv744793832=331, srv1073394883=18, srv1113186104=23, srv1370321362=69, srv328204461=249, srv1604342762=109, srv266460489=237, srv313806624=245, srv1473408823=93, srv865692144=366, srv42814401=265, srv104065318=10, srv1599236554=108, srv1476834435=94, srv1673452142=128, srv716892727=325, srv1501773847=98, srv791504502=346, srv367902453=254, srv254349567=232, srv2126102976=218, srv252714068=231, srv916506189=380, srv687320190=318, srv1000433998=0, srv51396503=281, srv648464134=313, srv908419423=379, srv204022732=200, srv1901650254=177, srv200342397=196, srv765841762=335, srv1849125656=167, srv235281774=226, srv2137298641=224, srv517347076=283, srv1687711069=135, srv800105834=347, srv1609917009=112, srv1038797815=9, srv863216619=365, srv921796978=382, srv895924009=376, srv319002955=246, srv611122413=305, srv1942590787=186, srv529333113=288, srv1053973741=14, srv1988512138=194, srv1037112526=8, srv442327402=268, srv2062351281=204, srv1240518778=48, srv471289019=274, srv1857090224=170, srv1543025253=101, srv1915241294=184, srv238420451=228, srv1747796150=145, srv1101668258=21, srv1437034663=88, srv1173449481=35, srv582652595=301, srv1739043021=144, srv1733173130=143, srv465824154=272, srv14463216=91, srv1720161153=140, srv1549403995=102, srv235920151=227, srv1909060246=179, srv527988350=287, srv1801762669=161, srv89501442=375, srv442994824=269, srv1414012241=83, srv165153258=121, srv1766333515=151, srv2063438865=205, srv1071671801=17, srv1638570398=116, srv1035353226=7, srv1856921753=169, srv1887444158=173, srv1897306674=176, srv1255718022=51, srv1260078897=53, srv1372945218=70, srv1163715139=31, srv175471358=146, srv1558656747=104, srv1463869996=92, srv124825865=49, srv1142495625=26, srv1397803774=77, srv1644508836=117, srv1807320536=162, srv1165273546=32, srv1650978005=120, srv1374260725=71, srv2065239646=206, srv1685737274=134, srv878340336=371, srv329463090=250, srv2112675912=213, srv1378293943=74, srv787532288=343, srv1292867420=59, srv519831391=285, srv1002018470=1, srv822141051=356, srv1229740495=45, srv706370370=321, srv255741565=233, srv1177018836=36, srv1223505925=43, srv745532463=332, srv1820836786=163, srv2127145828=220, srv2124524081=216, srv665150476=316, srv2132621880=223, srv2051928856=203, srv1903063797=178, srv881186303=373, srv1758974023=148, srv270549378=239, srv2014789268=198, srv1663469360=123, srv1331983035=65, srv1768940632=153, srv2084732799=210, srv1043044287=12, srv630246195=309, srv86319792=364, srv37305654=256, srv1650394019=119, srv1888093001=174, srv512441512=280, srv813969264=352, srv277288989=241, srv2017714321=199, srv1410469782=81, srv751917673=333, srv1443060804=89, srv1997063872=195, srv404426071=263, srv1443287861=90, srv695697141=320, srv636958174=310, srv1105584096=22, srv583005569=302, srv92523166=384, srv330226906=251, srv1684865692=133, srv381463497=258, srv567942525=297, srv1010403208=3, srv881516937=374, srv140693587=80, srv1872213858=172, srv262210172=234, srv846799674=358, srv851169364=360, srv880017865=372, srv129190288=58, srv401606217=262, srv669535820=317, srv1325384866=64, srv1377673856=73, srv1416276025=85, srv430431276=266, srv81513922=353, srv2044458062=201, srv2118166427=214, srv1665530216=125, srv2045587532=202, srv1824773168=164, srv2071913725=208, srv1295499145=60, srv1780304939=155, srv612277490=306, srv102508625=6, srv1637539828=115, srv820424989=355, srv50966795=279, srv1950402166=188, srv1207208580=42, srv1057648579=16, srv1084295726=20, srv39165764=260, srv959379519=387, srv2066402828=207, srv1556810592=103, srv1232731779=46, srv1606144164=110, srv1487275322=95, srv519310224=284, srv775221203=338, srv1079168923=19, srv1957834842=189, srv866525142=367, srv243907419=229, srv248553307=230, srv344122075=252, srv467461515=273, srv805609280=349, srv1018507425=4, srv1827511993=166, srv1704639485=137, srv855754935=362, srv1057024901=15, srv1116429721=24, srv927375731=385, srv1383836323=76, srv1584407048=107, srv809779157=351, srv1786622589=159, srv869541705=368, srv1123072042=25, srv1726136626=142, srv135800579=67, srv1958676591=191, srv390748718=259, srv907223095=378, srv76871917=336, srv1160170031=29, srv2119727728=215, srv918100507=381, srv1352063642=66, srv1975716907=193} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-17 21:53:14,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-17 21:53:14,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-17 21:53:14,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-17 21:53:14,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-17 21:53:14,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-17 21:53:14,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-17 21:53:14,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-17 21:53:14,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-17 21:53:14,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-17 21:53:14,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-17 21:53:14,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-17 21:53:14,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-17 21:53:14,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-17 21:53:14,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-17 21:53:14,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-17 21:53:14,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-17 21:53:14,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-17 21:53:14,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-17 21:53:14,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-17 21:53:14,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-17 21:53:14,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-17 21:53:14,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-17 21:53:14,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-17 21:53:14,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-17 21:53:14,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-17 21:53:14,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-17 21:53:14,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-17 21:53:14,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-17 21:53:14,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-17 21:53:14,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-17 21:53:14,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-17 21:53:14,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-17 21:53:14,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-17 21:53:14,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-17 21:53:14,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-17 21:53:14,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-17 21:53:14,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-17 21:53:14,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-17 21:53:14,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-17 21:53:14,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-17 21:53:14,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-17 21:53:14,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-17 21:53:14,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-17 21:53:14,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-17 21:53:14,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-17 21:53:14,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-17 21:53:14,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-17 21:53:14,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-17 21:53:14,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-17 21:53:14,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-17 21:53:14,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-17 21:53:14,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-17 21:53:14,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-17 21:53:14,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-17 21:53:14,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-17 21:53:14,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-17 21:53:14,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-17 21:53:14,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-17 21:53:14,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-17 21:53:14,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-17 21:53:14,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-17 21:53:14,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-17 21:53:14,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-17 21:53:14,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-17 21:53:14,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-17 21:53:14,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-17 21:53:14,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-17 21:53:14,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-17 21:53:14,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-17 21:53:14,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-17 21:53:14,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-17 21:53:14,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-17 21:53:14,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-17 21:53:14,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-17 21:53:14,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-17 21:53:14,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-17 21:53:14,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-17 21:53:14,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-17 21:53:14,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-17 21:53:14,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-17 21:53:14,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-17 21:53:14,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-17 21:53:14,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-17 21:53:14,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-17 21:53:14,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-17 21:53:14,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-17 21:53:14,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-17 21:53:14,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-17 21:53:14,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-17 21:53:14,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-17 21:53:14,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-17 21:53:14,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-17 21:53:14,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-17 21:53:14,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-17 21:53:14,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-17 21:53:14,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-17 21:53:14,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-17 21:53:14,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-17 21:53:14,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-17 21:53:14,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-17 21:53:14,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-17 21:53:14,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-17 21:53:14,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-17 21:53:14,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-17 21:53:14,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-17 21:53:14,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-17 21:53:14,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-17 21:53:14,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-17 21:53:14,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-17 21:53:14,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-17 21:53:14,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-17 21:53:14,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-17 21:53:14,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-17 21:53:14,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-17 21:53:14,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-17 21:53:14,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-17 21:53:14,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-17 21:53:14,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-17 21:53:14,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-17 21:53:14,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-17 21:53:14,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-17 21:53:14,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-17 21:53:14,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-17 21:53:14,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-17 21:53:14,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-17 21:53:14,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-17 21:53:14,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-17 21:53:14,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-17 21:53:14,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-17 21:53:14,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-17 21:53:14,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-17 21:53:14,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-17 21:53:14,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-17 21:53:14,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-17 21:53:14,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-17 21:53:14,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-17 21:53:14,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-17 21:53:14,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-17 21:53:14,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-17 21:53:14,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-17 21:53:14,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-17 21:53:14,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-17 21:53:14,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-17 21:53:14,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-17 21:53:14,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-17 21:53:14,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-17 21:53:14,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-17 21:53:14,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-17 21:53:14,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-17 21:53:14,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-17 21:53:14,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-17 21:53:14,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-17 21:53:14,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-17 21:53:14,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-17 21:53:14,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-17 21:53:14,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-17 21:53:14,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-17 21:53:14,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-17 21:53:14,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-17 21:53:14,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-17 21:53:14,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-17 21:53:14,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-17 21:53:14,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-17 21:53:14,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-17 21:53:14,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-17 21:53:14,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-17 21:53:14,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-17 21:53:14,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-17 21:53:14,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-17 21:53:14,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-17 21:53:14,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-17 21:53:14,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-17 21:53:14,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-17 21:53:14,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-17 21:53:14,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-17 21:53:14,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-17 21:53:14,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-17 21:53:14,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-17 21:53:14,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-17 21:53:14,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-17 21:53:14,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-17 21:53:14,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-17 21:53:14,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-17 21:53:14,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-17 21:53:14,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-17 21:53:14,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-17 21:53:14,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-17 21:53:14,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-17 21:53:14,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-17 21:53:14,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-17 21:53:14,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-17 21:53:14,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-17 21:53:14,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-17 21:53:14,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-17 21:53:14,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-17 21:53:14,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-17 21:53:14,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-17 21:53:14,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-17 21:53:14,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-17 21:53:14,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-17 21:53:14,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-17 21:53:14,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-17 21:53:14,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-17 21:53:14,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-17 21:53:14,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-17 21:53:14,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-17 21:53:14,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-17 21:53:14,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-17 21:53:14,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-17 21:53:14,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-17 21:53:14,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-17 21:53:14,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-17 21:53:14,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-17 21:53:14,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-17 21:53:14,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-17 21:53:14,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-17 21:53:14,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-17 21:53:14,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-17 21:53:14,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-17 21:53:14,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-17 21:53:14,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-17 21:53:14,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-17 21:53:14,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-17 21:53:14,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-17 21:53:14,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-17 21:53:14,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-17 21:53:14,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-17 21:53:14,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-17 21:53:14,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-17 21:53:14,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-17 21:53:14,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-17 21:53:14,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-17 21:53:14,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-17 21:53:14,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-17 21:53:14,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-17 21:53:14,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-17 21:53:14,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-17 21:53:14,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-17 21:53:14,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-17 21:53:14,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-17 21:53:14,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-17 21:53:14,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-17 21:53:14,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-17 21:53:14,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-17 21:53:14,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-17 21:53:14,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-17 21:53:14,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-17 21:53:14,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-17 21:53:14,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-17 21:53:14,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-17 21:53:14,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-17 21:53:14,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-17 21:53:14,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-17 21:53:14,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-17 21:53:14,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-17 21:53:14,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-17 21:53:14,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-17 21:53:14,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-17 21:53:14,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-17 21:53:14,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-17 21:53:14,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-17 21:53:14,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-17 21:53:14,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-17 21:53:14,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-17 21:53:14,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-17 21:53:14,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-17 21:53:14,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-17 21:53:14,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-17 21:53:14,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-17 21:53:14,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-17 21:53:14,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-17 21:53:14,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-17 21:53:14,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-17 21:53:14,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-17 21:53:14,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-17 21:53:14,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-17 21:53:14,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-17 21:53:14,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-17 21:53:14,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-17 21:53:14,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-17 21:53:14,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-17 21:53:14,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-17 21:53:14,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-17 21:53:14,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-17 21:53:14,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-17 21:53:14,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-17 21:53:14,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-17 21:53:14,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-17 21:53:14,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-17 21:53:14,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-17 21:53:14,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-17 21:53:14,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-17 21:53:14,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-17 21:53:14,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-17 21:53:14,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-17 21:53:14,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-17 21:53:14,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-17 21:53:14,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-17 21:53:14,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-17 21:53:14,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-17 21:53:14,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-17 21:53:14,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-17 21:53:14,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-17 21:53:14,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-17 21:53:14,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-17 21:53:14,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-17 21:53:14,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-17 21:53:14,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-17 21:53:14,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-17 21:53:14,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-17 21:53:14,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-17 21:53:14,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-17 21:53:14,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-17 21:53:14,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-17 21:53:14,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-17 21:53:14,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-17 21:53:14,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-17 21:53:14,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-17 21:53:14,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-17 21:53:14,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-17 21:53:14,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-17 21:53:14,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-17 21:53:14,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-17 21:53:14,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-17 21:53:14,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-17 21:53:14,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-17 21:53:14,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-17 21:53:14,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-17 21:53:14,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-17 21:53:14,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-17 21:53:14,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-17 21:53:14,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-17 21:53:14,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-17 21:53:14,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-17 21:53:14,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-17 21:53:14,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-17 21:53:14,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-17 21:53:14,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-17 21:53:14,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-17 21:53:14,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-17 21:53:14,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-17 21:53:14,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-17 21:53:14,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-17 21:53:14,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-17 21:53:14,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-17 21:53:14,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-17 21:53:14,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-17 21:53:14,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-17 21:53:14,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-17 21:53:14,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-17 21:53:14,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-17 21:53:14,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-17 21:53:14,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-17 21:53:14,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-17 21:53:14,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-17 21:53:14,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-17 21:53:14,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-17 21:53:14,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-17 21:53:14,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-17 21:53:14,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-17 21:53:14,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-17 21:53:14,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-17 21:53:14,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-17 21:53:14,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-17 21:53:14,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-17 21:53:14,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-17 21:53:14,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-17 21:53:14,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-17 21:53:14,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-17 21:53:14,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-17 21:53:14,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-17 21:53:14,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-17 21:53:14,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-17 21:53:14,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-17 21:53:14,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-17 21:53:14,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-17 21:53:14,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-17 21:53:14,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-17 21:53:14,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-17 21:53:14,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-17 21:53:14,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-17 21:53:14,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-17 21:53:14,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,624 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table16) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,624 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table17
2023-07-17 21:53:14,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv871358531=369, srv64697211=312, srv653261481=314, srv1778141916=154, srv716510755=323, srv372169288=255, srv568235512=298, srv710229516=322, srv537137712=293, srv1682791519=131, srv642353994=311, srv1046656068=13, srv993792848=391, srv1202667070=39, srv99567927=392, srv1607947050=111, srv1677371877=129, srv1763526149=150, srv1763378353=149, srv531263272=289, srv448398842=270, srv802808934=348, srv77960001=340, srv453521623=271, srv162773041=114, srv563606057=295, srv1659238910=122, srv1279307656=55, srv1914255334=183, srv1296605582=61, srv2131597846=222, srv1375359355=72, srv1405269336=79, srv175680261=147, srv282211488=242, srv1412891098=82, srv375712549=257, srv191234370=182, srv1574132168=106, srv1853511149=168, srv617306884=307, srv268601623=238, srv1400099806=78, srv477381292=275, srv1279442050=56, srv535853198=292, srv1767480590=152, srv2100700333=211, srv1187847151=37, srv791064637=345, srv74478935=330, srv1206084762=41, srv1497856295=97, srv897884865=377, srv398014971=261, srv786136704=342, srv1429879791=86, srv1201763981=38, srv1415213844=84, srv302220908=243, srv156683359=105, srv1974497084=192, srv535358845=291, srv627763604=308, srv732106437=326, srv1679724304=130, srv576770232=299, srv478480013=276, srv1237250370=47, srv1169018295=34, srv32320833=248, srv594880186=304, srv216306370=225, srv656484240=315, srv818754908=354, srv1321058011=63, srv1256345927=52, srv1670847243=126, srv1515243164=99, srv1781378955=156, srv508388209=278, srv1910886192=180, srv1718898730=139, srv772274482=337, srv1433624807=87, srv848605385=359, srv2107957639=212, srv270591905=240, srv2126706298=219, srv2080681743=209, srv1683990934=132, srv11526364=28, srv761020484=334, srv1720507603=141, srv266276730=236, srv935213051=386, srv923440665=383, srv1911104834=181, srv1944131651=187, srv1162841146=30, srv1921230216=185, srv319459319=247, srv1168022226=33, srv57689659=300, srv716533901=324, srv1255156178=50, srv441379967=267, srv806979625=350, srv788255577=344, srv976533744=389, srv1317853355=62, srv1491073587=96, srv777865249=339, srv2130226580=221, srv873230355=370, srv971370780=388, srv2008207413=197, srv989150800=390, srv737980208=328, srv862088563=363, srv1716783669=138, srv1801293056=160, srv1363984373=68, srv515711115=282, srv1378945327=75, srv17002515=136, srv853498273=361, srv1825292480=165, srv2124576425=217, srv1889349340=175, srv527691188=286, srv1226737728=44, srv1781498156=157, srv104267960=11, srv1663644309=124, srv1672213768=127, srv740402944=329, srv555807163=294, srv566277037=296, srv734882045=327, srv1143683685=27, srv1021400966=5, srv694407347=319, srv1626790310=113, srv303328507=244, srv1869166689=171, srv781623755=341, srv40741117=264, srv1958265988=190, srv592380483=303, srv483565354=277, srv1531731329=100, srv359746409=253, srv1271131029=54, srv1007512250=2, srv1783696565=158, srv1284150263=57, srv1648846971=118, srv120365207=40, srv263085176=235, srv535080964=290, srv824739010=357, srv744793832=331, srv1073394883=18, srv1113186104=23, srv1370321362=69, srv328204461=249, srv1604342762=109, srv266460489=237, srv313806624=245, srv1473408823=93, srv865692144=366, srv42814401=265, srv104065318=10, srv1599236554=108, srv1476834435=94, srv1673452142=128, srv716892727=325, srv1501773847=98, srv791504502=346, srv367902453=254, srv254349567=232, srv2126102976=218, srv252714068=231, srv916506189=380, srv687320190=318, srv1000433998=0, srv51396503=281, srv648464134=313, srv908419423=379, srv204022732=200, srv1901650254=177, srv200342397=196, srv765841762=335, srv1849125656=167, srv235281774=226, srv2137298641=224, srv517347076=283, srv1687711069=135, srv800105834=347, srv1609917009=112, srv1038797815=9, srv863216619=365, srv921796978=382, srv895924009=376, srv319002955=246, srv611122413=305, srv1942590787=186, srv529333113=288, srv1053973741=14, srv1988512138=194, srv1037112526=8, srv442327402=268, srv2062351281=204, srv1240518778=48, srv471289019=274, srv1857090224=170, srv1543025253=101, srv1915241294=184, srv238420451=228, srv1747796150=145, srv1101668258=21, srv1437034663=88, srv1173449481=35, srv582652595=301, srv1739043021=144, srv1733173130=143, srv465824154=272, srv14463216=91, srv1720161153=140, srv1549403995=102, srv235920151=227, srv1909060246=179, srv527988350=287, srv1801762669=161, srv89501442=375, srv442994824=269, srv1414012241=83, srv165153258=121, srv1766333515=151, srv2063438865=205, srv1071671801=17, srv1638570398=116, srv1035353226=7, srv1856921753=169, srv1887444158=173, srv1897306674=176, srv1255718022=51, srv1260078897=53, srv1372945218=70, srv1163715139=31, srv175471358=146, srv1558656747=104, srv1463869996=92, srv124825865=49, srv1142495625=26, srv1397803774=77, srv1644508836=117, srv1807320536=162, srv1165273546=32, srv1650978005=120, srv1374260725=71, srv2065239646=206, srv1685737274=134, srv878340336=371, srv329463090=250, srv2112675912=213, srv1378293943=74, srv787532288=343, srv1292867420=59, srv519831391=285, srv1002018470=1, srv822141051=356, srv1229740495=45, srv706370370=321, srv255741565=233, srv1177018836=36, srv1223505925=43, srv745532463=332, srv1820836786=163, srv2127145828=220, srv2124524081=216, srv665150476=316, srv2132621880=223, srv2051928856=203, srv1903063797=178, srv881186303=373, srv1758974023=148, srv270549378=239, srv2014789268=198, srv1663469360=123, srv1331983035=65, srv1768940632=153, srv2084732799=210, srv1043044287=12, srv630246195=309, srv86319792=364, srv37305654=256, srv1650394019=119, srv1888093001=174, srv512441512=280, srv813969264=352, srv277288989=241, srv2017714321=199, srv1410469782=81, srv751917673=333, srv1443060804=89, srv1997063872=195, srv404426071=263, srv1443287861=90, srv695697141=320, srv636958174=310, srv1105584096=22, srv583005569=302, srv92523166=384, srv330226906=251, srv1684865692=133, srv381463497=258, srv567942525=297, srv1010403208=3, srv881516937=374, srv140693587=80, srv1872213858=172, srv262210172=234, srv846799674=358, srv851169364=360, srv880017865=372, srv129190288=58, srv401606217=262, srv669535820=317, srv1325384866=64, srv1377673856=73, srv1416276025=85, srv430431276=266, srv81513922=353, srv2044458062=201, srv2118166427=214, srv1665530216=125, srv2045587532=202, srv1824773168=164, srv2071913725=208, srv1295499145=60, srv1780304939=155, srv612277490=306, srv102508625=6, srv1637539828=115, srv820424989=355, srv50966795=279, srv1950402166=188, srv1207208580=42, srv1057648579=16, srv1084295726=20, srv39165764=260, srv959379519=387, srv2066402828=207, srv1556810592=103, srv1232731779=46, srv1606144164=110, srv1487275322=95, srv519310224=284, srv775221203=338, srv1079168923=19, srv1957834842=189, srv866525142=367, srv243907419=229, srv248553307=230, srv344122075=252, srv467461515=273, srv805609280=349, srv1018507425=4, srv1827511993=166, srv1704639485=137, srv855754935=362, srv1057024901=15, srv1116429721=24, srv927375731=385, srv1383836323=76, srv1584407048=107, srv809779157=351, srv1786622589=159, srv869541705=368, srv1123072042=25, srv1726136626=142, srv135800579=67, srv1958676591=191, srv390748718=259, srv907223095=378, srv76871917=336, srv1160170031=29, srv2119727728=215, srv918100507=381, srv1352063642=66, srv1975716907=193} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-17 21:53:14,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-17 21:53:14,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-17 21:53:14,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-17 21:53:14,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-17 21:53:14,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-17 21:53:14,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-17 21:53:14,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-17 21:53:14,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-17 21:53:14,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-17 21:53:14,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-17 21:53:14,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-17 21:53:14,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-17 21:53:14,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-17 21:53:14,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-17 21:53:14,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-17 21:53:14,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-17 21:53:14,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-17 21:53:14,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-17 21:53:14,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-17 21:53:14,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-17 21:53:14,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-17 21:53:14,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-17 21:53:14,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-17 21:53:14,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-17 21:53:14,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-17 21:53:14,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-17 21:53:14,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-17 21:53:14,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-17 21:53:14,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-17 21:53:14,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-17 21:53:14,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-17 21:53:14,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-17 21:53:14,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-17 21:53:14,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-17 21:53:14,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-17 21:53:14,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-17 21:53:14,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-17 21:53:14,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-17 21:53:14,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-17 21:53:14,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-17 21:53:14,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-17 21:53:14,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-17 21:53:14,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-17 21:53:14,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-17 21:53:14,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-17 21:53:14,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-17 21:53:14,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-17 21:53:14,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-17 21:53:14,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-17 21:53:14,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-17 21:53:14,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-17 21:53:14,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-17 21:53:14,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-17 21:53:14,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-17 21:53:14,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-17 21:53:14,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-17 21:53:14,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-17 21:53:14,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-17 21:53:14,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-17 21:53:14,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-17 21:53:14,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-17 21:53:14,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-17 21:53:14,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-17 21:53:14,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-17 21:53:14,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-17 21:53:14,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-17 21:53:14,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-17 21:53:14,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-17 21:53:14,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-17 21:53:14,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-17 21:53:14,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-17 21:53:14,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-17 21:53:14,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-17 21:53:14,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-17 21:53:14,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-17 21:53:14,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-17 21:53:14,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-17 21:53:14,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-17 21:53:14,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-17 21:53:14,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-17 21:53:14,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-17 21:53:14,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-17 21:53:14,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-17 21:53:14,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-17 21:53:14,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-17 21:53:14,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-17 21:53:14,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-17 21:53:14,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-17 21:53:14,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-17 21:53:14,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-17 21:53:14,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-17 21:53:14,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-17 21:53:14,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-17 21:53:14,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-17 21:53:14,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-17 21:53:14,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-17 21:53:14,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-17 21:53:14,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-17 21:53:14,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-17 21:53:14,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-17 21:53:14,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-17 21:53:14,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-17 21:53:14,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-17 21:53:14,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-17 21:53:14,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-17 21:53:14,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-17 21:53:14,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-17 21:53:14,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-17 21:53:14,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-17 21:53:14,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-17 21:53:14,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-17 21:53:14,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-17 21:53:14,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-17 21:53:14,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-17 21:53:14,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-17 21:53:14,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-17 21:53:14,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-17 21:53:14,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-17 21:53:14,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-17 21:53:14,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-17 21:53:14,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-17 21:53:14,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-17 21:53:14,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-17 21:53:14,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-17 21:53:14,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-17 21:53:14,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-17 21:53:14,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-17 21:53:14,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-17 21:53:14,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-17 21:53:14,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-17 21:53:14,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-17 21:53:14,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-17 21:53:14,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-17 21:53:14,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-17 21:53:14,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-17 21:53:14,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-17 21:53:14,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-17 21:53:14,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-17 21:53:14,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-17 21:53:14,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-17 21:53:14,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-17 21:53:14,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-17 21:53:14,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-17 21:53:14,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-17 21:53:14,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-17 21:53:14,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-17 21:53:14,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-17 21:53:14,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-17 21:53:14,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-17 21:53:14,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-17 21:53:14,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-17 21:53:14,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-17 21:53:14,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-17 21:53:14,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-17 21:53:14,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-17 21:53:14,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-17 21:53:14,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-17 21:53:14,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-17 21:53:14,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-17 21:53:14,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-17 21:53:14,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-17 21:53:14,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-17 21:53:14,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-17 21:53:14,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-17 21:53:14,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-17 21:53:14,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-17 21:53:14,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-17 21:53:14,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-17 21:53:14,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-17 21:53:14,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-17 21:53:14,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-17 21:53:14,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-17 21:53:14,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-17 21:53:14,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-17 21:53:14,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-17 21:53:14,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-17 21:53:14,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-17 21:53:14,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-17 21:53:14,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-17 21:53:14,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-17 21:53:14,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-17 21:53:14,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-17 21:53:14,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-17 21:53:14,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-17 21:53:14,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-17 21:53:14,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-17 21:53:14,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-17 21:53:14,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-17 21:53:14,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-17 21:53:14,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-17 21:53:14,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-17 21:53:14,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-17 21:53:14,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-17 21:53:14,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-17 21:53:14,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-17 21:53:14,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-17 21:53:14,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-17 21:53:14,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-17 21:53:14,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-17 21:53:14,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-17 21:53:14,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-17 21:53:14,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-17 21:53:14,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-17 21:53:14,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-17 21:53:14,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-17 21:53:14,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-17 21:53:14,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-17 21:53:14,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-17 21:53:14,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-17 21:53:14,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-17 21:53:14,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-17 21:53:14,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-17 21:53:14,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-17 21:53:14,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-17 21:53:14,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-17 21:53:14,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-17 21:53:14,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-17 21:53:14,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-17 21:53:14,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-17 21:53:14,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-17 21:53:14,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-17 21:53:14,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-17 21:53:14,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-17 21:53:14,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-17 21:53:14,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-17 21:53:14,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-17 21:53:14,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-17 21:53:14,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-17 21:53:14,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-17 21:53:14,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-17 21:53:14,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-17 21:53:14,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-17 21:53:14,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-17 21:53:14,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-17 21:53:14,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-17 21:53:14,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-17 21:53:14,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-17 21:53:14,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-17 21:53:14,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-17 21:53:14,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-17 21:53:14,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-17 21:53:14,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-17 21:53:14,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-17 21:53:14,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-17 21:53:14,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-17 21:53:14,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-17 21:53:14,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-17 21:53:14,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-17 21:53:14,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-17 21:53:14,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-17 21:53:14,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-17 21:53:14,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-17 21:53:14,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-17 21:53:14,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-17 21:53:14,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-17 21:53:14,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-17 21:53:14,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-17 21:53:14,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-17 21:53:14,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-17 21:53:14,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-17 21:53:14,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-17 21:53:14,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-17 21:53:14,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-17 21:53:14,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-17 21:53:14,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-17 21:53:14,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-17 21:53:14,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-17 21:53:14,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-17 21:53:14,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-17 21:53:14,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-17 21:53:14,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-17 21:53:14,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-17 21:53:14,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-17 21:53:14,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-17 21:53:14,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-17 21:53:14,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-17 21:53:14,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-17 21:53:14,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-17 21:53:14,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-17 21:53:14,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-17 21:53:14,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-17 21:53:14,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-17 21:53:14,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-17 21:53:14,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-17 21:53:14,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-17 21:53:14,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-17 21:53:14,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-17 21:53:14,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-17 21:53:14,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-17 21:53:14,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-17 21:53:14,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-17 21:53:14,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-17 21:53:14,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-17 21:53:14,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-17 21:53:14,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-17 21:53:14,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-17 21:53:14,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-17 21:53:14,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-17 21:53:14,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-17 21:53:14,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-17 21:53:14,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-17 21:53:14,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-17 21:53:14,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-17 21:53:14,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-17 21:53:14,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-17 21:53:14,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-17 21:53:14,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-17 21:53:14,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-17 21:53:14,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-17 21:53:14,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-17 21:53:14,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-17 21:53:14,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-17 21:53:14,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-17 21:53:14,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-17 21:53:14,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-17 21:53:14,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-17 21:53:14,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-17 21:53:14,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-17 21:53:14,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-17 21:53:14,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-17 21:53:14,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-17 21:53:14,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-17 21:53:14,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-17 21:53:14,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-17 21:53:14,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-17 21:53:14,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-17 21:53:14,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-17 21:53:14,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-17 21:53:14,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-17 21:53:14,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-17 21:53:14,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-17 21:53:14,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-17 21:53:14,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-17 21:53:14,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-17 21:53:14,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-17 21:53:14,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-17 21:53:14,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-17 21:53:14,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-17 21:53:14,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-17 21:53:14,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-17 21:53:14,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-17 21:53:14,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-17 21:53:14,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-17 21:53:14,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-17 21:53:14,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-17 21:53:14,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-17 21:53:14,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-17 21:53:14,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-17 21:53:14,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-17 21:53:14,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-17 21:53:14,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-17 21:53:14,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-17 21:53:14,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-17 21:53:14,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-17 21:53:14,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-17 21:53:14,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-17 21:53:14,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-17 21:53:14,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-17 21:53:14,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-17 21:53:14,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-17 21:53:14,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-17 21:53:14,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-17 21:53:14,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-17 21:53:14,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-17 21:53:14,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-17 21:53:14,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-17 21:53:14,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-17 21:53:14,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-17 21:53:14,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-17 21:53:14,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-17 21:53:14,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-17 21:53:14,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-17 21:53:14,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-17 21:53:14,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-17 21:53:14,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-17 21:53:14,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-17 21:53:14,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-17 21:53:14,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-17 21:53:14,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-17 21:53:14,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-17 21:53:14,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-17 21:53:14,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-17 21:53:14,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,639 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table17) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,640 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table18
2023-07-17 21:53:14,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv871358531=369, srv64697211=312, srv653261481=314, srv1778141916=154, srv716510755=323, srv372169288=255, srv568235512=298, srv710229516=322, srv537137712=293, srv1682791519=131, srv642353994=311, srv1046656068=13, srv993792848=391, srv1202667070=39, srv99567927=392, srv1607947050=111, srv1677371877=129, srv1763526149=150, srv1763378353=149, srv531263272=289, srv448398842=270, srv802808934=348, srv77960001=340, srv453521623=271, srv162773041=114, srv563606057=295, srv1659238910=122, srv1279307656=55, srv1914255334=183, srv1296605582=61, srv2131597846=222, srv1375359355=72, srv1405269336=79, srv175680261=147, srv282211488=242, srv1412891098=82, srv375712549=257, srv191234370=182, srv1574132168=106, srv1853511149=168, srv617306884=307, srv268601623=238, srv1400099806=78, srv477381292=275, srv1279442050=56, srv535853198=292, srv1767480590=152, srv2100700333=211, srv1187847151=37, srv791064637=345, srv74478935=330, srv1206084762=41, srv1497856295=97, srv897884865=377, srv398014971=261, srv786136704=342, srv1429879791=86, srv1201763981=38, srv1415213844=84, srv302220908=243, srv156683359=105, srv1974497084=192, srv535358845=291, srv627763604=308, srv732106437=326, srv1679724304=130, srv576770232=299, srv478480013=276, srv1237250370=47, srv1169018295=34, srv32320833=248, srv594880186=304, srv216306370=225, srv656484240=315, srv818754908=354, srv1321058011=63, srv1256345927=52, srv1670847243=126, srv1515243164=99, srv1781378955=156, srv508388209=278, srv1910886192=180, srv1718898730=139, srv772274482=337, srv1433624807=87, srv848605385=359, srv2107957639=212, srv270591905=240, srv2126706298=219, srv2080681743=209, srv1683990934=132, srv11526364=28, srv761020484=334, srv1720507603=141, srv266276730=236, srv935213051=386, srv923440665=383, srv1911104834=181, srv1944131651=187, srv1162841146=30, srv1921230216=185, srv319459319=247, srv1168022226=33, srv57689659=300, srv716533901=324, srv1255156178=50, srv441379967=267, srv806979625=350, srv788255577=344, srv976533744=389, srv1317853355=62, srv1491073587=96, srv777865249=339, srv2130226580=221, srv873230355=370, srv971370780=388, srv2008207413=197, srv989150800=390, srv737980208=328, srv862088563=363, srv1716783669=138, srv1801293056=160, srv1363984373=68, srv515711115=282, srv1378945327=75, srv17002515=136, srv853498273=361, srv1825292480=165, srv2124576425=217, srv1889349340=175, srv527691188=286, srv1226737728=44, srv1781498156=157, srv104267960=11, srv1663644309=124, srv1672213768=127, srv740402944=329, srv555807163=294, srv566277037=296, srv734882045=327, srv1143683685=27, srv1021400966=5, srv694407347=319, srv1626790310=113, srv303328507=244, srv1869166689=171, srv781623755=341, srv40741117=264, srv1958265988=190, srv592380483=303, srv483565354=277, srv1531731329=100, srv359746409=253, srv1271131029=54, srv1007512250=2, srv1783696565=158, srv1284150263=57, srv1648846971=118, srv120365207=40, srv263085176=235, srv535080964=290, srv824739010=357, srv744793832=331, srv1073394883=18, srv1113186104=23, srv1370321362=69, srv328204461=249, srv1604342762=109, srv266460489=237, srv313806624=245, srv1473408823=93, srv865692144=366, srv42814401=265, srv104065318=10, srv1599236554=108, srv1476834435=94, srv1673452142=128, srv716892727=325, srv1501773847=98, srv791504502=346, srv367902453=254, srv254349567=232, srv2126102976=218, srv252714068=231, srv916506189=380, srv687320190=318, srv1000433998=0, srv51396503=281, srv648464134=313, srv908419423=379, srv204022732=200, srv1901650254=177, srv200342397=196, srv765841762=335, srv1849125656=167, srv235281774=226, srv2137298641=224, srv517347076=283, srv1687711069=135, srv800105834=347, srv1609917009=112, srv1038797815=9, srv863216619=365, srv921796978=382, srv895924009=376, srv319002955=246, srv611122413=305, srv1942590787=186, srv529333113=288, srv1053973741=14, srv1988512138=194, srv1037112526=8, srv442327402=268, srv2062351281=204, srv1240518778=48, srv471289019=274, srv1857090224=170, srv1543025253=101, srv1915241294=184, srv238420451=228, srv1747796150=145, srv1101668258=21, srv1437034663=88, srv1173449481=35, srv582652595=301, srv1739043021=144, srv1733173130=143, srv465824154=272, srv14463216=91, srv1720161153=140, srv1549403995=102, srv235920151=227, srv1909060246=179, srv527988350=287, srv1801762669=161, srv89501442=375, srv442994824=269, srv1414012241=83, srv165153258=121, srv1766333515=151, srv2063438865=205, srv1071671801=17, srv1638570398=116, srv1035353226=7, srv1856921753=169, srv1887444158=173, srv1897306674=176, srv1255718022=51, srv1260078897=53, srv1372945218=70, srv1163715139=31, srv175471358=146, srv1558656747=104, srv1463869996=92, srv124825865=49, srv1142495625=26, srv1397803774=77, srv1644508836=117, srv1807320536=162, srv1165273546=32, srv1650978005=120, srv1374260725=71, srv2065239646=206, srv1685737274=134, srv878340336=371, srv329463090=250, srv2112675912=213, srv1378293943=74, srv787532288=343, srv1292867420=59, srv519831391=285, srv1002018470=1, srv822141051=356, srv1229740495=45, srv706370370=321, srv255741565=233, srv1177018836=36, srv1223505925=43, srv745532463=332, srv1820836786=163, srv2127145828=220, srv2124524081=216, srv665150476=316, srv2132621880=223, srv2051928856=203, srv1903063797=178, srv881186303=373, srv1758974023=148, srv270549378=239, srv2014789268=198, srv1663469360=123, srv1331983035=65, srv1768940632=153, srv2084732799=210, srv1043044287=12, srv630246195=309, srv86319792=364, srv37305654=256, srv1650394019=119, srv1888093001=174, srv512441512=280, srv813969264=352, srv277288989=241, srv2017714321=199, srv1410469782=81, srv751917673=333, srv1443060804=89, srv1997063872=195, srv404426071=263, srv1443287861=90, srv695697141=320, srv636958174=310, srv1105584096=22, srv583005569=302, srv92523166=384, srv330226906=251, srv1684865692=133, srv381463497=258, srv567942525=297, srv1010403208=3, srv881516937=374, srv140693587=80, srv1872213858=172, srv262210172=234, srv846799674=358, srv851169364=360, srv880017865=372, srv129190288=58, srv401606217=262, srv669535820=317, srv1325384866=64, srv1377673856=73, srv1416276025=85, srv430431276=266, srv81513922=353, srv2044458062=201, srv2118166427=214, srv1665530216=125, srv2045587532=202, srv1824773168=164, srv2071913725=208, srv1295499145=60, srv1780304939=155, srv612277490=306, srv102508625=6, srv1637539828=115, srv820424989=355, srv50966795=279, srv1950402166=188, srv1207208580=42, srv1057648579=16, srv1084295726=20, srv39165764=260, srv959379519=387, srv2066402828=207, srv1556810592=103, srv1232731779=46, srv1606144164=110, srv1487275322=95, srv519310224=284, srv775221203=338, srv1079168923=19, srv1957834842=189, srv866525142=367, srv243907419=229, srv248553307=230, srv344122075=252, srv467461515=273, srv805609280=349, srv1018507425=4, srv1827511993=166, srv1704639485=137, srv855754935=362, srv1057024901=15, srv1116429721=24, srv927375731=385, srv1383836323=76, srv1584407048=107, srv809779157=351, srv1786622589=159, srv869541705=368, srv1123072042=25, srv1726136626=142, srv135800579=67, srv1958676591=191, srv390748718=259, srv907223095=378, srv76871917=336, srv1160170031=29, srv2119727728=215, srv918100507=381, srv1352063642=66, srv1975716907=193} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-17 21:53:14,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-17 21:53:14,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-17 21:53:14,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-17 21:53:14,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-17 21:53:14,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-17 21:53:14,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-17 21:53:14,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-17 21:53:14,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-17 21:53:14,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-17 21:53:14,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-17 21:53:14,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-17 21:53:14,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-17 21:53:14,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-17 21:53:14,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-17 21:53:14,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-17 21:53:14,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-17 21:53:14,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-17 21:53:14,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-17 21:53:14,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-17 21:53:14,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-17 21:53:14,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-17 21:53:14,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-17 21:53:14,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-17 21:53:14,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-17 21:53:14,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-17 21:53:14,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-17 21:53:14,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-17 21:53:14,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-17 21:53:14,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-17 21:53:14,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-17 21:53:14,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-17 21:53:14,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-17 21:53:14,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-17 21:53:14,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-17 21:53:14,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-17 21:53:14,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-17 21:53:14,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-17 21:53:14,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-17 21:53:14,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-17 21:53:14,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-17 21:53:14,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-17 21:53:14,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-17 21:53:14,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-17 21:53:14,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-17 21:53:14,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-17 21:53:14,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-17 21:53:14,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-17 21:53:14,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-17 21:53:14,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-17 21:53:14,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-17 21:53:14,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-17 21:53:14,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-17 21:53:14,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-17 21:53:14,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-17 21:53:14,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-17 21:53:14,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-17 21:53:14,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-17 21:53:14,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-17 21:53:14,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-17 21:53:14,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-17 21:53:14,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-17 21:53:14,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-17 21:53:14,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-17 21:53:14,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-17 21:53:14,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-17 21:53:14,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-17 21:53:14,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-17 21:53:14,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-17 21:53:14,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-17 21:53:14,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-17 21:53:14,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-17 21:53:14,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-17 21:53:14,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-17 21:53:14,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-17 21:53:14,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-17 21:53:14,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-17 21:53:14,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-17 21:53:14,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-17 21:53:14,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-17 21:53:14,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-17 21:53:14,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-17 21:53:14,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-17 21:53:14,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-17 21:53:14,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-17 21:53:14,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-17 21:53:14,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-17 21:53:14,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-17 21:53:14,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-17 21:53:14,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-17 21:53:14,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-17 21:53:14,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-17 21:53:14,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-17 21:53:14,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-17 21:53:14,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-17 21:53:14,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-17 21:53:14,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-17 21:53:14,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-17 21:53:14,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-17 21:53:14,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-17 21:53:14,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-17 21:53:14,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-17 21:53:14,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-17 21:53:14,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-17 21:53:14,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-17 21:53:14,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-17 21:53:14,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-17 21:53:14,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-17 21:53:14,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-17 21:53:14,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-17 21:53:14,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-17 21:53:14,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-17 21:53:14,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-17 21:53:14,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-17 21:53:14,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-17 21:53:14,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-17 21:53:14,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-17 21:53:14,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-17 21:53:14,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-17 21:53:14,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-17 21:53:14,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-17 21:53:14,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-17 21:53:14,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-17 21:53:14,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-17 21:53:14,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-17 21:53:14,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-17 21:53:14,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-17 21:53:14,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-17 21:53:14,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-17 21:53:14,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-17 21:53:14,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-17 21:53:14,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-17 21:53:14,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-17 21:53:14,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-17 21:53:14,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-17 21:53:14,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-17 21:53:14,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-17 21:53:14,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-17 21:53:14,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-17 21:53:14,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-17 21:53:14,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-17 21:53:14,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-17 21:53:14,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-17 21:53:14,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-17 21:53:14,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-17 21:53:14,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-17 21:53:14,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-17 21:53:14,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-17 21:53:14,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-17 21:53:14,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-17 21:53:14,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-17 21:53:14,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-17 21:53:14,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-17 21:53:14,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-17 21:53:14,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-17 21:53:14,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-17 21:53:14,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-17 21:53:14,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-17 21:53:14,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-17 21:53:14,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-17 21:53:14,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-17 21:53:14,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-17 21:53:14,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-17 21:53:14,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-17 21:53:14,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-17 21:53:14,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-17 21:53:14,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-17 21:53:14,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-17 21:53:14,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-17 21:53:14,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-17 21:53:14,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-17 21:53:14,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-17 21:53:14,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-17 21:53:14,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-17 21:53:14,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-17 21:53:14,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-17 21:53:14,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-17 21:53:14,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-17 21:53:14,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-17 21:53:14,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-17 21:53:14,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-17 21:53:14,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-17 21:53:14,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-17 21:53:14,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-17 21:53:14,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-17 21:53:14,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-17 21:53:14,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-17 21:53:14,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-17 21:53:14,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-17 21:53:14,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-17 21:53:14,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-17 21:53:14,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-17 21:53:14,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-17 21:53:14,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-17 21:53:14,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-17 21:53:14,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-17 21:53:14,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-17 21:53:14,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-17 21:53:14,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-17 21:53:14,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-17 21:53:14,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-17 21:53:14,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-17 21:53:14,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-17 21:53:14,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-17 21:53:14,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-17 21:53:14,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-17 21:53:14,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-17 21:53:14,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-17 21:53:14,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-17 21:53:14,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-17 21:53:14,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-17 21:53:14,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-17 21:53:14,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-17 21:53:14,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-17 21:53:14,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-17 21:53:14,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-17 21:53:14,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-17 21:53:14,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-17 21:53:14,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-17 21:53:14,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-17 21:53:14,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-17 21:53:14,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-17 21:53:14,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-17 21:53:14,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-17 21:53:14,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-17 21:53:14,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-17 21:53:14,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-17 21:53:14,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-17 21:53:14,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-17 21:53:14,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-17 21:53:14,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-17 21:53:14,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-17 21:53:14,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-17 21:53:14,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-17 21:53:14,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-17 21:53:14,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-17 21:53:14,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-17 21:53:14,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-17 21:53:14,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-17 21:53:14,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-17 21:53:14,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-17 21:53:14,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-17 21:53:14,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-17 21:53:14,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-17 21:53:14,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-17 21:53:14,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-17 21:53:14,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-17 21:53:14,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-17 21:53:14,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-17 21:53:14,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-17 21:53:14,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-17 21:53:14,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-17 21:53:14,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-17 21:53:14,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-17 21:53:14,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-17 21:53:14,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-17 21:53:14,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-17 21:53:14,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-17 21:53:14,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-17 21:53:14,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-17 21:53:14,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-17 21:53:14,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-17 21:53:14,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-17 21:53:14,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-17 21:53:14,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-17 21:53:14,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-17 21:53:14,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-17 21:53:14,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-17 21:53:14,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-17 21:53:14,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-17 21:53:14,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-17 21:53:14,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-17 21:53:14,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-17 21:53:14,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-17 21:53:14,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-17 21:53:14,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-17 21:53:14,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-17 21:53:14,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-17 21:53:14,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-17 21:53:14,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-17 21:53:14,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-17 21:53:14,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-17 21:53:14,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-17 21:53:14,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-17 21:53:14,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-17 21:53:14,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-17 21:53:14,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-17 21:53:14,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-17 21:53:14,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-17 21:53:14,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-17 21:53:14,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-17 21:53:14,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-17 21:53:14,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-17 21:53:14,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-17 21:53:14,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-17 21:53:14,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-17 21:53:14,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-17 21:53:14,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-17 21:53:14,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-17 21:53:14,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-17 21:53:14,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-17 21:53:14,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-17 21:53:14,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-17 21:53:14,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-17 21:53:14,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-17 21:53:14,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-17 21:53:14,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-17 21:53:14,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-17 21:53:14,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-17 21:53:14,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-17 21:53:14,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-17 21:53:14,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-17 21:53:14,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-17 21:53:14,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-17 21:53:14,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-17 21:53:14,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-17 21:53:14,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-17 21:53:14,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-17 21:53:14,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-17 21:53:14,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-17 21:53:14,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-17 21:53:14,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-17 21:53:14,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-17 21:53:14,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-17 21:53:14,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-17 21:53:14,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-17 21:53:14,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-17 21:53:14,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-17 21:53:14,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-17 21:53:14,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-17 21:53:14,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-17 21:53:14,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-17 21:53:14,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-17 21:53:14,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-17 21:53:14,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-17 21:53:14,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-17 21:53:14,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-17 21:53:14,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-17 21:53:14,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-17 21:53:14,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-17 21:53:14,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-17 21:53:14,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-17 21:53:14,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-17 21:53:14,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-17 21:53:14,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-17 21:53:14,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-17 21:53:14,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-17 21:53:14,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-17 21:53:14,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-17 21:53:14,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-17 21:53:14,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-17 21:53:14,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-17 21:53:14,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-17 21:53:14,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-17 21:53:14,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-17 21:53:14,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-17 21:53:14,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-17 21:53:14,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-17 21:53:14,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-17 21:53:14,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-17 21:53:14,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-17 21:53:14,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-17 21:53:14,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-17 21:53:14,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-17 21:53:14,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-17 21:53:14,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-17 21:53:14,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-17 21:53:14,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-17 21:53:14,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-17 21:53:14,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-17 21:53:14,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-17 21:53:14,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-17 21:53:14,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-17 21:53:14,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-17 21:53:14,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-17 21:53:14,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-17 21:53:14,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-17 21:53:14,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-17 21:53:14,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-17 21:53:14,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-17 21:53:14,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-17 21:53:14,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-17 21:53:14,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-17 21:53:14,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,655 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table18) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,655 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table19
2023-07-17 21:53:14,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv871358531=369, srv64697211=312, srv653261481=314, srv1778141916=154, srv716510755=323, srv372169288=255, srv568235512=298, srv710229516=322, srv537137712=293, srv1682791519=131, srv642353994=311, srv1046656068=13, srv993792848=391, srv1202667070=39, srv99567927=392, srv1607947050=111, srv1677371877=129, srv1763526149=150, srv1763378353=149, srv531263272=289, srv448398842=270, srv802808934=348, srv77960001=340, srv453521623=271, srv162773041=114, srv563606057=295, srv1659238910=122, srv1279307656=55, srv1914255334=183, srv1296605582=61, srv2131597846=222, srv1375359355=72, srv1405269336=79, srv175680261=147, srv282211488=242, srv1412891098=82, srv375712549=257, srv191234370=182, srv1574132168=106, srv1853511149=168, srv617306884=307, srv268601623=238, srv1400099806=78, srv477381292=275, srv1279442050=56, srv535853198=292, srv1767480590=152, srv2100700333=211, srv1187847151=37, srv791064637=345, srv74478935=330, srv1206084762=41, srv1497856295=97, srv897884865=377, srv398014971=261, srv786136704=342, srv1429879791=86, srv1201763981=38, srv1415213844=84, srv302220908=243, srv156683359=105, srv1974497084=192, srv535358845=291, srv627763604=308, srv732106437=326, srv1679724304=130, srv576770232=299, srv478480013=276, srv1237250370=47, srv1169018295=34, srv32320833=248, srv594880186=304, srv216306370=225, srv656484240=315, srv818754908=354, srv1321058011=63, srv1256345927=52, srv1670847243=126, srv1515243164=99, srv1781378955=156, srv508388209=278, srv1910886192=180, srv1718898730=139, srv772274482=337, srv1433624807=87, srv848605385=359, srv2107957639=212, srv270591905=240, srv2126706298=219, srv2080681743=209, srv1683990934=132, srv11526364=28, srv761020484=334, srv1720507603=141, srv266276730=236, srv935213051=386, srv923440665=383, srv1911104834=181, srv1944131651=187, srv1162841146=30, srv1921230216=185, srv319459319=247, srv1168022226=33, srv57689659=300, srv716533901=324, srv1255156178=50, srv441379967=267, srv806979625=350, srv788255577=344, srv976533744=389, srv1317853355=62, srv1491073587=96, srv777865249=339, srv2130226580=221, srv873230355=370, srv971370780=388, srv2008207413=197, srv989150800=390, srv737980208=328, srv862088563=363, srv1716783669=138, srv1801293056=160, srv1363984373=68, srv515711115=282, srv1378945327=75, srv17002515=136, srv853498273=361, srv1825292480=165, srv2124576425=217, srv1889349340=175, srv527691188=286, srv1226737728=44, srv1781498156=157, srv104267960=11, srv1663644309=124, srv1672213768=127, srv740402944=329, srv555807163=294, srv566277037=296, srv734882045=327, srv1143683685=27, srv1021400966=5, srv694407347=319, srv1626790310=113, srv303328507=244, srv1869166689=171, srv781623755=341, srv40741117=264, srv1958265988=190, srv592380483=303, srv483565354=277, srv1531731329=100, srv359746409=253, srv1271131029=54, srv1007512250=2, srv1783696565=158, srv1284150263=57, srv1648846971=118, srv120365207=40, srv263085176=235, srv535080964=290, srv824739010=357, srv744793832=331, srv1073394883=18, srv1113186104=23, srv1370321362=69, srv328204461=249, srv1604342762=109, srv266460489=237, srv313806624=245, srv1473408823=93, srv865692144=366, srv42814401=265, srv104065318=10, srv1599236554=108, srv1476834435=94, srv1673452142=128, srv716892727=325, srv1501773847=98, srv791504502=346, srv367902453=254, srv254349567=232, srv2126102976=218, srv252714068=231, srv916506189=380, srv687320190=318, srv1000433998=0, srv51396503=281, srv648464134=313, srv908419423=379, srv204022732=200, srv1901650254=177, srv200342397=196, srv765841762=335, srv1849125656=167, srv235281774=226, srv2137298641=224, srv517347076=283, srv1687711069=135, srv800105834=347, srv1609917009=112, srv1038797815=9, srv863216619=365, srv921796978=382, srv895924009=376, srv319002955=246, srv611122413=305, srv1942590787=186, srv529333113=288, srv1053973741=14, srv1988512138=194, srv1037112526=8, srv442327402=268, srv2062351281=204, srv1240518778=48, srv471289019=274, srv1857090224=170, srv1543025253=101, srv1915241294=184, srv238420451=228, srv1747796150=145, srv1101668258=21, srv1437034663=88, srv1173449481=35, srv582652595=301, srv1739043021=144, srv1733173130=143, srv465824154=272, srv14463216=91, srv1720161153=140, srv1549403995=102, srv235920151=227, srv1909060246=179, srv527988350=287, srv1801762669=161, srv89501442=375, srv442994824=269, srv1414012241=83, srv165153258=121, srv1766333515=151, srv2063438865=205, srv1071671801=17, srv1638570398=116, srv1035353226=7, srv1856921753=169, srv1887444158=173, srv1897306674=176, srv1255718022=51, srv1260078897=53, srv1372945218=70, srv1163715139=31, srv175471358=146, srv1558656747=104, srv1463869996=92, srv124825865=49, srv1142495625=26, srv1397803774=77, srv1644508836=117, srv1807320536=162, srv1165273546=32, srv1650978005=120, srv1374260725=71, srv2065239646=206, srv1685737274=134, srv878340336=371, srv329463090=250, srv2112675912=213, srv1378293943=74, srv787532288=343, srv1292867420=59, srv519831391=285, srv1002018470=1, srv822141051=356, srv1229740495=45, srv706370370=321, srv255741565=233, srv1177018836=36, srv1223505925=43, srv745532463=332, srv1820836786=163, srv2127145828=220, srv2124524081=216, srv665150476=316, srv2132621880=223, srv2051928856=203, srv1903063797=178, srv881186303=373, srv1758974023=148, srv270549378=239, srv2014789268=198, srv1663469360=123, srv1331983035=65, srv1768940632=153, srv2084732799=210, srv1043044287=12, srv630246195=309, srv86319792=364, srv37305654=256, srv1650394019=119, srv1888093001=174, srv512441512=280, srv813969264=352, srv277288989=241, srv2017714321=199, srv1410469782=81, srv751917673=333, srv1443060804=89, srv1997063872=195, srv404426071=263, srv1443287861=90, srv695697141=320, srv636958174=310, srv1105584096=22, srv583005569=302, srv92523166=384, srv330226906=251, srv1684865692=133, srv381463497=258, srv567942525=297, srv1010403208=3, srv881516937=374, srv140693587=80, srv1872213858=172, srv262210172=234, srv846799674=358, srv851169364=360, srv880017865=372, srv129190288=58, srv401606217=262, srv669535820=317, srv1325384866=64, srv1377673856=73, srv1416276025=85, srv430431276=266, srv81513922=353, srv2044458062=201, srv2118166427=214, srv1665530216=125, srv2045587532=202, srv1824773168=164, srv2071913725=208, srv1295499145=60, srv1780304939=155, srv612277490=306, srv102508625=6, srv1637539828=115, srv820424989=355, srv50966795=279, srv1950402166=188, srv1207208580=42, srv1057648579=16, srv1084295726=20, srv39165764=260, srv959379519=387, srv2066402828=207, srv1556810592=103, srv1232731779=46, srv1606144164=110, srv1487275322=95, srv519310224=284, srv775221203=338, srv1079168923=19, srv1957834842=189, srv866525142=367, srv243907419=229, srv248553307=230, srv344122075=252, srv467461515=273, srv805609280=349, srv1018507425=4, srv1827511993=166, srv1704639485=137, srv855754935=362, srv1057024901=15, srv1116429721=24, srv927375731=385, srv1383836323=76, srv1584407048=107, srv809779157=351, srv1786622589=159, srv869541705=368, srv1123072042=25, srv1726136626=142, srv135800579=67, srv1958676591=191, srv390748718=259, srv907223095=378, srv76871917=336, srv1160170031=29, srv2119727728=215, srv918100507=381, srv1352063642=66, srv1975716907=193} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-17 21:53:14,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-17 21:53:14,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-17 21:53:14,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-17 21:53:14,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-17 21:53:14,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-17 21:53:14,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-17 21:53:14,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-17 21:53:14,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-17 21:53:14,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-17 21:53:14,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-17 21:53:14,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-17 21:53:14,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-17 21:53:14,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-17 21:53:14,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-17 21:53:14,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-17 21:53:14,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-17 21:53:14,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-17 21:53:14,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-17 21:53:14,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-17 21:53:14,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-17 21:53:14,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-17 21:53:14,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-17 21:53:14,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-17 21:53:14,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-17 21:53:14,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-17 21:53:14,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-17 21:53:14,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-17 21:53:14,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-17 21:53:14,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-17 21:53:14,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-17 21:53:14,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-17 21:53:14,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-17 21:53:14,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-17 21:53:14,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-17 21:53:14,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-17 21:53:14,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-17 21:53:14,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-17 21:53:14,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-17 21:53:14,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-17 21:53:14,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-17 21:53:14,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-17 21:53:14,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-17 21:53:14,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-17 21:53:14,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-17 21:53:14,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-17 21:53:14,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-17 21:53:14,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-17 21:53:14,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-17 21:53:14,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-17 21:53:14,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-17 21:53:14,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-17 21:53:14,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-17 21:53:14,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-17 21:53:14,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-17 21:53:14,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-17 21:53:14,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-17 21:53:14,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-17 21:53:14,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-17 21:53:14,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-17 21:53:14,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-17 21:53:14,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-17 21:53:14,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-17 21:53:14,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-17 21:53:14,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-17 21:53:14,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-17 21:53:14,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-17 21:53:14,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-17 21:53:14,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-17 21:53:14,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-17 21:53:14,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-17 21:53:14,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-17 21:53:14,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-17 21:53:14,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-17 21:53:14,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-17 21:53:14,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-17 21:53:14,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-17 21:53:14,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-17 21:53:14,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-17 21:53:14,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-17 21:53:14,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-17 21:53:14,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-17 21:53:14,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-17 21:53:14,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-17 21:53:14,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-17 21:53:14,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-17 21:53:14,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-17 21:53:14,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-17 21:53:14,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-17 21:53:14,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-17 21:53:14,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-17 21:53:14,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-17 21:53:14,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-17 21:53:14,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-17 21:53:14,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-17 21:53:14,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-17 21:53:14,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-17 21:53:14,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-17 21:53:14,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-17 21:53:14,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-17 21:53:14,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-17 21:53:14,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-17 21:53:14,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-17 21:53:14,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-17 21:53:14,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-17 21:53:14,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-17 21:53:14,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-17 21:53:14,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-17 21:53:14,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-17 21:53:14,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-17 21:53:14,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-17 21:53:14,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-17 21:53:14,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-17 21:53:14,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-17 21:53:14,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-17 21:53:14,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-17 21:53:14,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-17 21:53:14,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-17 21:53:14,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-17 21:53:14,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-17 21:53:14,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-17 21:53:14,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-17 21:53:14,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-17 21:53:14,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-17 21:53:14,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-17 21:53:14,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-17 21:53:14,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-17 21:53:14,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-17 21:53:14,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-17 21:53:14,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-17 21:53:14,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-17 21:53:14,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-17 21:53:14,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-17 21:53:14,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-17 21:53:14,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-17 21:53:14,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-17 21:53:14,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-17 21:53:14,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-17 21:53:14,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-17 21:53:14,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-17 21:53:14,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-17 21:53:14,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-17 21:53:14,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-17 21:53:14,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-17 21:53:14,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-17 21:53:14,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-17 21:53:14,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-17 21:53:14,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-17 21:53:14,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-17 21:53:14,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-17 21:53:14,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-17 21:53:14,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-17 21:53:14,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-17 21:53:14,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-17 21:53:14,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-17 21:53:14,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-17 21:53:14,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-17 21:53:14,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-17 21:53:14,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-17 21:53:14,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-17 21:53:14,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-17 21:53:14,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-17 21:53:14,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-17 21:53:14,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-17 21:53:14,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-17 21:53:14,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-17 21:53:14,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-17 21:53:14,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-17 21:53:14,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-17 21:53:14,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-17 21:53:14,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-17 21:53:14,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-17 21:53:14,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-17 21:53:14,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-17 21:53:14,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-17 21:53:14,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-17 21:53:14,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-17 21:53:14,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-17 21:53:14,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-17 21:53:14,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-17 21:53:14,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-17 21:53:14,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-17 21:53:14,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-17 21:53:14,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-17 21:53:14,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-17 21:53:14,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-17 21:53:14,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-17 21:53:14,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-17 21:53:14,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-17 21:53:14,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-17 21:53:14,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-17 21:53:14,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-17 21:53:14,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-17 21:53:14,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-17 21:53:14,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-17 21:53:14,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-17 21:53:14,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-17 21:53:14,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-17 21:53:14,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-17 21:53:14,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-17 21:53:14,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-17 21:53:14,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-17 21:53:14,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-17 21:53:14,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-17 21:53:14,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-17 21:53:14,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-17 21:53:14,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-17 21:53:14,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-17 21:53:14,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-17 21:53:14,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-17 21:53:14,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-17 21:53:14,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-17 21:53:14,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-17 21:53:14,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-17 21:53:14,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-17 21:53:14,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-17 21:53:14,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-17 21:53:14,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-17 21:53:14,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-17 21:53:14,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-17 21:53:14,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-17 21:53:14,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-17 21:53:14,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-17 21:53:14,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-17 21:53:14,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-17 21:53:14,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-17 21:53:14,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-17 21:53:14,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-17 21:53:14,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-17 21:53:14,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-17 21:53:14,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-17 21:53:14,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-17 21:53:14,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-17 21:53:14,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-17 21:53:14,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-17 21:53:14,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-17 21:53:14,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-17 21:53:14,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-17 21:53:14,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-17 21:53:14,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-17 21:53:14,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-17 21:53:14,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-17 21:53:14,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-17 21:53:14,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-17 21:53:14,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-17 21:53:14,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-17 21:53:14,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-17 21:53:14,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-17 21:53:14,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-17 21:53:14,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-17 21:53:14,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-17 21:53:14,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-17 21:53:14,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-17 21:53:14,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-17 21:53:14,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-17 21:53:14,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-17 21:53:14,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-17 21:53:14,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-17 21:53:14,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-17 21:53:14,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-17 21:53:14,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-17 21:53:14,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-17 21:53:14,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-17 21:53:14,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-17 21:53:14,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-17 21:53:14,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-17 21:53:14,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-17 21:53:14,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-17 21:53:14,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-17 21:53:14,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-17 21:53:14,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-17 21:53:14,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-17 21:53:14,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-17 21:53:14,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-17 21:53:14,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-17 21:53:14,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-17 21:53:14,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-17 21:53:14,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-17 21:53:14,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-17 21:53:14,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-17 21:53:14,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-17 21:53:14,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-17 21:53:14,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-17 21:53:14,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-17 21:53:14,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-17 21:53:14,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-17 21:53:14,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-17 21:53:14,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-17 21:53:14,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-17 21:53:14,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-17 21:53:14,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-17 21:53:14,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-17 21:53:14,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-17 21:53:14,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-17 21:53:14,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-17 21:53:14,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-17 21:53:14,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-17 21:53:14,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-17 21:53:14,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-17 21:53:14,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-17 21:53:14,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-17 21:53:14,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-17 21:53:14,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-17 21:53:14,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-17 21:53:14,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-17 21:53:14,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-17 21:53:14,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-17 21:53:14,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-17 21:53:14,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-17 21:53:14,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-17 21:53:14,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-17 21:53:14,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-17 21:53:14,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-17 21:53:14,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-17 21:53:14,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-17 21:53:14,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-17 21:53:14,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-17 21:53:14,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-17 21:53:14,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-17 21:53:14,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-17 21:53:14,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-17 21:53:14,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-17 21:53:14,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-17 21:53:14,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-17 21:53:14,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-17 21:53:14,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-17 21:53:14,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-17 21:53:14,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-17 21:53:14,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-17 21:53:14,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-17 21:53:14,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-17 21:53:14,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-17 21:53:14,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-17 21:53:14,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-17 21:53:14,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-17 21:53:14,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-17 21:53:14,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-17 21:53:14,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-17 21:53:14,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-17 21:53:14,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-17 21:53:14,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-17 21:53:14,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-17 21:53:14,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-17 21:53:14,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-17 21:53:14,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-17 21:53:14,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-17 21:53:14,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-17 21:53:14,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-17 21:53:14,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-17 21:53:14,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-17 21:53:14,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-17 21:53:14,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-17 21:53:14,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-17 21:53:14,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-17 21:53:14,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-17 21:53:14,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-17 21:53:14,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-17 21:53:14,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-17 21:53:14,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-17 21:53:14,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-17 21:53:14,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-17 21:53:14,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-17 21:53:14,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-17 21:53:14,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-17 21:53:14,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-17 21:53:14,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-17 21:53:14,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-17 21:53:14,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-17 21:53:14,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-17 21:53:14,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-17 21:53:14,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-17 21:53:14,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-17 21:53:14,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-17 21:53:14,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-17 21:53:14,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-17 21:53:14,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-17 21:53:14,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-17 21:53:14,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-17 21:53:14,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-17 21:53:14,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-17 21:53:14,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-17 21:53:14,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-17 21:53:14,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-17 21:53:14,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,670 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table19) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,670 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table50
2023-07-17 21:53:14,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv871358531=369, srv64697211=312, srv653261481=314, srv1778141916=154, srv716510755=323, srv372169288=255, srv568235512=298, srv710229516=322, srv537137712=293, srv1682791519=131, srv642353994=311, srv1046656068=13, srv993792848=391, srv1202667070=39, srv99567927=392, srv1607947050=111, srv1677371877=129, srv1763526149=150, srv1763378353=149, srv531263272=289, srv448398842=270, srv802808934=348, srv77960001=340, srv453521623=271, srv162773041=114, srv563606057=295, srv1659238910=122, srv1279307656=55, srv1914255334=183, srv1296605582=61, srv2131597846=222, srv1375359355=72, srv1405269336=79, srv175680261=147, srv282211488=242, srv1412891098=82, srv375712549=257, srv191234370=182, srv1574132168=106, srv1853511149=168, srv617306884=307, srv268601623=238, srv1400099806=78, srv477381292=275, srv1279442050=56, srv535853198=292, srv1767480590=152, srv2100700333=211, srv1187847151=37, srv791064637=345, srv74478935=330, srv1206084762=41, srv1497856295=97, srv897884865=377, srv398014971=261, srv786136704=342, srv1429879791=86, srv1201763981=38, srv1415213844=84, srv302220908=243, srv156683359=105, srv1974497084=192, srv535358845=291, srv627763604=308, srv732106437=326, srv1679724304=130, srv576770232=299, srv478480013=276, srv1237250370=47, srv1169018295=34, srv32320833=248, srv594880186=304, srv216306370=225, srv656484240=315, srv818754908=354, srv1321058011=63, srv1256345927=52, srv1670847243=126, srv1515243164=99, srv1781378955=156, srv508388209=278, srv1910886192=180, srv1718898730=139, srv772274482=337, srv1433624807=87, srv848605385=359, srv2107957639=212, srv270591905=240, srv2126706298=219, srv2080681743=209, srv1683990934=132, srv11526364=28, srv761020484=334, srv1720507603=141, srv266276730=236, srv935213051=386, srv923440665=383, srv1911104834=181, srv1944131651=187, srv1162841146=30, srv1921230216=185, srv319459319=247, srv1168022226=33, srv57689659=300, srv716533901=324, srv1255156178=50, srv441379967=267, srv806979625=350, srv788255577=344, srv976533744=389, srv1317853355=62, srv1491073587=96, srv777865249=339, srv2130226580=221, srv873230355=370, srv971370780=388, srv2008207413=197, srv989150800=390, srv737980208=328, srv862088563=363, srv1716783669=138, srv1801293056=160, srv1363984373=68, srv515711115=282, srv1378945327=75, srv17002515=136, srv853498273=361, srv1825292480=165, srv2124576425=217, srv1889349340=175, srv527691188=286, srv1226737728=44, srv1781498156=157, srv104267960=11, srv1663644309=124, srv1672213768=127, srv740402944=329, srv555807163=294, srv566277037=296, srv734882045=327, srv1143683685=27, srv1021400966=5, srv694407347=319, srv1626790310=113, srv303328507=244, srv1869166689=171, srv781623755=341, srv40741117=264, srv1958265988=190, srv592380483=303, srv483565354=277, srv1531731329=100, srv359746409=253, srv1271131029=54, srv1007512250=2, srv1783696565=158, srv1284150263=57, srv1648846971=118, srv120365207=40, srv263085176=235, srv535080964=290, srv824739010=357, srv744793832=331, srv1073394883=18, srv1113186104=23, srv1370321362=69, srv328204461=249, srv1604342762=109, srv266460489=237, srv313806624=245, srv1473408823=93, srv865692144=366, srv42814401=265, srv104065318=10, srv1599236554=108, srv1476834435=94, srv1673452142=128, srv716892727=325, srv1501773847=98, srv791504502=346, srv367902453=254, srv254349567=232, srv2126102976=218, srv252714068=231, srv916506189=380, srv687320190=318, srv1000433998=0, srv51396503=281, srv648464134=313, srv908419423=379, srv204022732=200, srv1901650254=177, srv200342397=196, srv765841762=335, srv1849125656=167, srv235281774=226, srv2137298641=224, srv517347076=283, srv1687711069=135, srv800105834=347, srv1609917009=112, srv1038797815=9, srv863216619=365, srv921796978=382, srv895924009=376, srv319002955=246, srv611122413=305, srv1942590787=186, srv529333113=288, srv1053973741=14, srv1988512138=194, srv1037112526=8, srv442327402=268, srv2062351281=204, srv1240518778=48, srv471289019=274, srv1857090224=170, srv1543025253=101, srv1915241294=184, srv238420451=228, srv1747796150=145, srv1101668258=21, srv1437034663=88, srv1173449481=35, srv582652595=301, srv1739043021=144, srv1733173130=143, srv465824154=272, srv14463216=91, srv1720161153=140, srv1549403995=102, srv235920151=227, srv1909060246=179, srv527988350=287, srv1801762669=161, srv89501442=375, srv442994824=269, srv1414012241=83, srv165153258=121, srv1766333515=151, srv2063438865=205, srv1071671801=17, srv1638570398=116, srv1035353226=7, srv1856921753=169, srv1887444158=173, srv1897306674=176, srv1255718022=51, srv1260078897=53, srv1372945218=70, srv1163715139=31, srv175471358=146, srv1558656747=104, srv1463869996=92, srv124825865=49, srv1142495625=26, srv1397803774=77, srv1644508836=117, srv1807320536=162, srv1165273546=32, srv1650978005=120, srv1374260725=71, srv2065239646=206, srv1685737274=134, srv878340336=371, srv329463090=250, srv2112675912=213, srv1378293943=74, srv787532288=343, srv1292867420=59, srv519831391=285, srv1002018470=1, srv822141051=356, srv1229740495=45, srv706370370=321, srv255741565=233, srv1177018836=36, srv1223505925=43, srv745532463=332, srv1820836786=163, srv2127145828=220, srv2124524081=216, srv665150476=316, srv2132621880=223, srv2051928856=203, srv1903063797=178, srv881186303=373, srv1758974023=148, srv270549378=239, srv2014789268=198, srv1663469360=123, srv1331983035=65, srv1768940632=153, srv2084732799=210, srv1043044287=12, srv630246195=309, srv86319792=364, srv37305654=256, srv1650394019=119, srv1888093001=174, srv512441512=280, srv813969264=352, srv277288989=241, srv2017714321=199, srv1410469782=81, srv751917673=333, srv1443060804=89, srv1997063872=195, srv404426071=263, srv1443287861=90, srv695697141=320, srv636958174=310, srv1105584096=22, srv583005569=302, srv92523166=384, srv330226906=251, srv1684865692=133, srv381463497=258, srv567942525=297, srv1010403208=3, srv881516937=374, srv140693587=80, srv1872213858=172, srv262210172=234, srv846799674=358, srv851169364=360, srv880017865=372, srv129190288=58, srv401606217=262, srv669535820=317, srv1325384866=64, srv1377673856=73, srv1416276025=85, srv430431276=266, srv81513922=353, srv2044458062=201, srv2118166427=214, srv1665530216=125, srv2045587532=202, srv1824773168=164, srv2071913725=208, srv1295499145=60, srv1780304939=155, srv612277490=306, srv102508625=6, srv1637539828=115, srv820424989=355, srv50966795=279, srv1950402166=188, srv1207208580=42, srv1057648579=16, srv1084295726=20, srv39165764=260, srv959379519=387, srv2066402828=207, srv1556810592=103, srv1232731779=46, srv1606144164=110, srv1487275322=95, srv519310224=284, srv775221203=338, srv1079168923=19, srv1957834842=189, srv866525142=367, srv243907419=229, srv248553307=230, srv344122075=252, srv467461515=273, srv805609280=349, srv1018507425=4, srv1827511993=166, srv1704639485=137, srv855754935=362, srv1057024901=15, srv1116429721=24, srv927375731=385, srv1383836323=76, srv1584407048=107, srv809779157=351, srv1786622589=159, srv869541705=368, srv1123072042=25, srv1726136626=142, srv135800579=67, srv1958676591=191, srv390748718=259, srv907223095=378, srv76871917=336, srv1160170031=29, srv2119727728=215, srv918100507=381, srv1352063642=66, srv1975716907=193} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-17 21:53:14,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-17 21:53:14,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-17 21:53:14,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-17 21:53:14,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-17 21:53:14,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-17 21:53:14,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-17 21:53:14,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-17 21:53:14,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-17 21:53:14,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-17 21:53:14,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-17 21:53:14,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-17 21:53:14,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-17 21:53:14,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-17 21:53:14,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-17 21:53:14,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-17 21:53:14,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-17 21:53:14,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-17 21:53:14,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-17 21:53:14,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-17 21:53:14,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-17 21:53:14,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-17 21:53:14,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-17 21:53:14,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-17 21:53:14,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-17 21:53:14,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-17 21:53:14,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-17 21:53:14,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-17 21:53:14,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-17 21:53:14,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-17 21:53:14,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-17 21:53:14,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-17 21:53:14,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-17 21:53:14,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-17 21:53:14,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-17 21:53:14,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-17 21:53:14,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-17 21:53:14,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-17 21:53:14,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-17 21:53:14,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-17 21:53:14,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-17 21:53:14,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-17 21:53:14,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-17 21:53:14,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-17 21:53:14,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-17 21:53:14,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-17 21:53:14,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-17 21:53:14,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-17 21:53:14,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-17 21:53:14,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-17 21:53:14,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-17 21:53:14,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-17 21:53:14,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-17 21:53:14,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-17 21:53:14,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-17 21:53:14,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-17 21:53:14,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-17 21:53:14,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-17 21:53:14,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-17 21:53:14,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-17 21:53:14,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-17 21:53:14,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-17 21:53:14,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-17 21:53:14,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-17 21:53:14,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-17 21:53:14,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-17 21:53:14,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-17 21:53:14,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-17 21:53:14,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-17 21:53:14,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-17 21:53:14,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-17 21:53:14,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-17 21:53:14,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-17 21:53:14,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-17 21:53:14,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-17 21:53:14,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-17 21:53:14,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-17 21:53:14,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-17 21:53:14,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-17 21:53:14,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-17 21:53:14,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-17 21:53:14,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-17 21:53:14,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-17 21:53:14,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-17 21:53:14,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-17 21:53:14,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-17 21:53:14,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-17 21:53:14,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-17 21:53:14,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-17 21:53:14,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-17 21:53:14,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-17 21:53:14,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-17 21:53:14,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-17 21:53:14,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-17 21:53:14,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-17 21:53:14,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-17 21:53:14,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-17 21:53:14,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-17 21:53:14,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-17 21:53:14,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-17 21:53:14,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-17 21:53:14,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-17 21:53:14,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-17 21:53:14,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-17 21:53:14,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-17 21:53:14,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-17 21:53:14,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-17 21:53:14,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-17 21:53:14,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-17 21:53:14,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-17 21:53:14,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-17 21:53:14,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-17 21:53:14,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-17 21:53:14,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-17 21:53:14,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-17 21:53:14,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-17 21:53:14,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-17 21:53:14,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-17 21:53:14,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-17 21:53:14,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-17 21:53:14,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-17 21:53:14,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-17 21:53:14,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-17 21:53:14,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-17 21:53:14,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-17 21:53:14,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-17 21:53:14,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-17 21:53:14,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-17 21:53:14,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-17 21:53:14,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-17 21:53:14,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-17 21:53:14,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-17 21:53:14,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-17 21:53:14,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-17 21:53:14,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-17 21:53:14,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-17 21:53:14,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-17 21:53:14,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-17 21:53:14,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-17 21:53:14,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-17 21:53:14,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-17 21:53:14,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-17 21:53:14,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-17 21:53:14,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-17 21:53:14,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-17 21:53:14,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-17 21:53:14,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-17 21:53:14,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-17 21:53:14,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-17 21:53:14,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-17 21:53:14,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-17 21:53:14,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-17 21:53:14,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-17 21:53:14,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-17 21:53:14,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-17 21:53:14,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-17 21:53:14,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-17 21:53:14,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-17 21:53:14,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-17 21:53:14,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-17 21:53:14,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-17 21:53:14,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-17 21:53:14,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-17 21:53:14,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-17 21:53:14,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-17 21:53:14,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-17 21:53:14,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-17 21:53:14,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-17 21:53:14,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-17 21:53:14,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-17 21:53:14,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-17 21:53:14,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-17 21:53:14,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-17 21:53:14,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-17 21:53:14,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-17 21:53:14,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-17 21:53:14,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-17 21:53:14,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-17 21:53:14,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-17 21:53:14,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-17 21:53:14,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-17 21:53:14,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-17 21:53:14,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-17 21:53:14,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-17 21:53:14,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-17 21:53:14,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-17 21:53:14,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-17 21:53:14,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-17 21:53:14,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-17 21:53:14,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-17 21:53:14,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-17 21:53:14,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-17 21:53:14,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-17 21:53:14,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-17 21:53:14,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-17 21:53:14,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-17 21:53:14,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-17 21:53:14,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-17 21:53:14,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-17 21:53:14,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-17 21:53:14,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-17 21:53:14,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-17 21:53:14,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-17 21:53:14,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-17 21:53:14,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-17 21:53:14,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-17 21:53:14,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-17 21:53:14,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-17 21:53:14,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-17 21:53:14,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-17 21:53:14,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-17 21:53:14,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-17 21:53:14,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-17 21:53:14,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-17 21:53:14,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-17 21:53:14,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-17 21:53:14,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-17 21:53:14,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-17 21:53:14,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-17 21:53:14,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-17 21:53:14,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-17 21:53:14,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-17 21:53:14,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-17 21:53:14,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-17 21:53:14,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-17 21:53:14,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-17 21:53:14,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-17 21:53:14,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-17 21:53:14,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-17 21:53:14,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-17 21:53:14,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-17 21:53:14,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-17 21:53:14,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-17 21:53:14,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-17 21:53:14,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-17 21:53:14,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-17 21:53:14,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-17 21:53:14,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-17 21:53:14,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-17 21:53:14,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-17 21:53:14,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-17 21:53:14,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-17 21:53:14,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-17 21:53:14,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-17 21:53:14,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-17 21:53:14,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-17 21:53:14,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-17 21:53:14,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-17 21:53:14,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-17 21:53:14,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-17 21:53:14,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-17 21:53:14,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-17 21:53:14,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-17 21:53:14,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-17 21:53:14,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-17 21:53:14,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-17 21:53:14,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-17 21:53:14,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-17 21:53:14,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-17 21:53:14,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-17 21:53:14,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-17 21:53:14,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-17 21:53:14,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-17 21:53:14,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-17 21:53:14,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-17 21:53:14,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-17 21:53:14,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-17 21:53:14,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-17 21:53:14,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-17 21:53:14,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-17 21:53:14,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-17 21:53:14,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-17 21:53:14,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-17 21:53:14,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-17 21:53:14,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-17 21:53:14,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-17 21:53:14,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-17 21:53:14,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-17 21:53:14,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-17 21:53:14,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-17 21:53:14,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-17 21:53:14,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-17 21:53:14,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-17 21:53:14,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-17 21:53:14,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-17 21:53:14,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-17 21:53:14,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-17 21:53:14,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-17 21:53:14,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-17 21:53:14,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-17 21:53:14,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-17 21:53:14,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-17 21:53:14,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-17 21:53:14,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-17 21:53:14,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-17 21:53:14,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-17 21:53:14,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-17 21:53:14,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-17 21:53:14,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-17 21:53:14,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-17 21:53:14,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-17 21:53:14,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-17 21:53:14,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-17 21:53:14,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-17 21:53:14,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-17 21:53:14,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-17 21:53:14,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-17 21:53:14,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-17 21:53:14,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-17 21:53:14,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-17 21:53:14,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-17 21:53:14,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-17 21:53:14,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-17 21:53:14,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-17 21:53:14,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-17 21:53:14,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-17 21:53:14,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-17 21:53:14,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-17 21:53:14,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-17 21:53:14,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-17 21:53:14,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-17 21:53:14,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-17 21:53:14,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-17 21:53:14,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-17 21:53:14,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-17 21:53:14,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-17 21:53:14,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-17 21:53:14,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-17 21:53:14,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-17 21:53:14,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-17 21:53:14,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-17 21:53:14,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-17 21:53:14,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-17 21:53:14,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-17 21:53:14,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-17 21:53:14,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-17 21:53:14,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-17 21:53:14,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-17 21:53:14,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-17 21:53:14,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-17 21:53:14,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-17 21:53:14,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-17 21:53:14,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-17 21:53:14,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-17 21:53:14,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-17 21:53:14,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-17 21:53:14,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-17 21:53:14,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-17 21:53:14,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-17 21:53:14,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-17 21:53:14,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-17 21:53:14,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-17 21:53:14,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-17 21:53:14,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-17 21:53:14,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-17 21:53:14,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-17 21:53:14,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-17 21:53:14,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-17 21:53:14,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-17 21:53:14,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-17 21:53:14,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-17 21:53:14,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-17 21:53:14,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-17 21:53:14,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-17 21:53:14,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-17 21:53:14,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-17 21:53:14,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-17 21:53:14,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-17 21:53:14,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-17 21:53:14,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-17 21:53:14,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-17 21:53:14,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-17 21:53:14,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-17 21:53:14,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-17 21:53:14,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-17 21:53:14,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-17 21:53:14,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-17 21:53:14,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-17 21:53:14,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-17 21:53:14,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-17 21:53:14,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-17 21:53:14,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-17 21:53:14,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-17 21:53:14,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,685 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table50) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,685 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table51
2023-07-17 21:53:14,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv871358531=369, srv64697211=312, srv653261481=314, srv1778141916=154, srv716510755=323, srv372169288=255, srv568235512=298, srv710229516=322, srv537137712=293, srv1682791519=131, srv642353994=311, srv1046656068=13, srv993792848=391, srv1202667070=39, srv99567927=392, srv1607947050=111, srv1677371877=129, srv1763526149=150, srv1763378353=149, srv531263272=289, srv448398842=270, srv802808934=348, srv77960001=340, srv453521623=271, srv162773041=114, srv563606057=295, srv1659238910=122, srv1279307656=55, srv1914255334=183, srv1296605582=61, srv2131597846=222, srv1375359355=72, srv1405269336=79, srv175680261=147, srv282211488=242, srv1412891098=82, srv375712549=257, srv191234370=182, srv1574132168=106, srv1853511149=168, srv617306884=307, srv268601623=238, srv1400099806=78, srv477381292=275, srv1279442050=56, srv535853198=292, srv1767480590=152, srv2100700333=211, srv1187847151=37, srv791064637=345, srv74478935=330, srv1206084762=41, srv1497856295=97, srv897884865=377, srv398014971=261, srv786136704=342, srv1429879791=86, srv1201763981=38, srv1415213844=84, srv302220908=243, srv156683359=105, srv1974497084=192, srv535358845=291, srv627763604=308, srv732106437=326, srv1679724304=130, srv576770232=299, srv478480013=276, srv1237250370=47, srv1169018295=34, srv32320833=248, srv594880186=304, srv216306370=225, srv656484240=315, srv818754908=354, srv1321058011=63, srv1256345927=52, srv1670847243=126, srv1515243164=99, srv1781378955=156, srv508388209=278, srv1910886192=180, srv1718898730=139, srv772274482=337, srv1433624807=87, srv848605385=359, srv2107957639=212, srv270591905=240, srv2126706298=219, srv2080681743=209, srv1683990934=132, srv11526364=28, srv761020484=334, srv1720507603=141, srv266276730=236, srv935213051=386, srv923440665=383, srv1911104834=181, srv1944131651=187, srv1162841146=30, srv1921230216=185, srv319459319=247, srv1168022226=33, srv57689659=300, srv716533901=324, srv1255156178=50, srv441379967=267, srv806979625=350, srv788255577=344, srv976533744=389, srv1317853355=62, srv1491073587=96, srv777865249=339, srv2130226580=221, srv873230355=370, srv971370780=388, srv2008207413=197, srv989150800=390, srv737980208=328, srv862088563=363, srv1716783669=138, srv1801293056=160, srv1363984373=68, srv515711115=282, srv1378945327=75, srv17002515=136, srv853498273=361, srv1825292480=165, srv2124576425=217, srv1889349340=175, srv527691188=286, srv1226737728=44, srv1781498156=157, srv104267960=11, srv1663644309=124, srv1672213768=127, srv740402944=329, srv555807163=294, srv566277037=296, srv734882045=327, srv1143683685=27, srv1021400966=5, srv694407347=319, srv1626790310=113, srv303328507=244, srv1869166689=171, srv781623755=341, srv40741117=264, srv1958265988=190, srv592380483=303, srv483565354=277, srv1531731329=100, srv359746409=253, srv1271131029=54, srv1007512250=2, srv1783696565=158, srv1284150263=57, srv1648846971=118, srv120365207=40, srv263085176=235, srv535080964=290, srv824739010=357, srv744793832=331, srv1073394883=18, srv1113186104=23, srv1370321362=69, srv328204461=249, srv1604342762=109, srv266460489=237, srv313806624=245, srv1473408823=93, srv865692144=366, srv42814401=265, srv104065318=10, srv1599236554=108, srv1476834435=94, srv1673452142=128, srv716892727=325, srv1501773847=98, srv791504502=346, srv367902453=254, srv254349567=232, srv2126102976=218, srv252714068=231, srv916506189=380, srv687320190=318, srv1000433998=0, srv51396503=281, srv648464134=313, srv908419423=379, srv204022732=200, srv1901650254=177, srv200342397=196, srv765841762=335, srv1849125656=167, srv235281774=226, srv2137298641=224, srv517347076=283, srv1687711069=135, srv800105834=347, srv1609917009=112, srv1038797815=9, srv863216619=365, srv921796978=382, srv895924009=376, srv319002955=246, srv611122413=305, srv1942590787=186, srv529333113=288, srv1053973741=14, srv1988512138=194, srv1037112526=8, srv442327402=268, srv2062351281=204, srv1240518778=48, srv471289019=274, srv1857090224=170, srv1543025253=101, srv1915241294=184, srv238420451=228, srv1747796150=145, srv1101668258=21, srv1437034663=88, srv1173449481=35, srv582652595=301, srv1739043021=144, srv1733173130=143, srv465824154=272, srv14463216=91, srv1720161153=140, srv1549403995=102, srv235920151=227, srv1909060246=179, srv527988350=287, srv1801762669=161, srv89501442=375, srv442994824=269, srv1414012241=83, srv165153258=121, srv1766333515=151, srv2063438865=205, srv1071671801=17, srv1638570398=116, srv1035353226=7, srv1856921753=169, srv1887444158=173, srv1897306674=176, srv1255718022=51, srv1260078897=53, srv1372945218=70, srv1163715139=31, srv175471358=146, srv1558656747=104, srv1463869996=92, srv124825865=49, srv1142495625=26, srv1397803774=77, srv1644508836=117, srv1807320536=162, srv1165273546=32, srv1650978005=120, srv1374260725=71, srv2065239646=206, srv1685737274=134, srv878340336=371, srv329463090=250, srv2112675912=213, srv1378293943=74, srv787532288=343, srv1292867420=59, srv519831391=285, srv1002018470=1, srv822141051=356, srv1229740495=45, srv706370370=321, srv255741565=233, srv1177018836=36, srv1223505925=43, srv745532463=332, srv1820836786=163, srv2127145828=220, srv2124524081=216, srv665150476=316, srv2132621880=223, srv2051928856=203, srv1903063797=178, srv881186303=373, srv1758974023=148, srv270549378=239, srv2014789268=198, srv1663469360=123, srv1331983035=65, srv1768940632=153, srv2084732799=210, srv1043044287=12, srv630246195=309, srv86319792=364, srv37305654=256, srv1650394019=119, srv1888093001=174, srv512441512=280, srv813969264=352, srv277288989=241, srv2017714321=199, srv1410469782=81, srv751917673=333, srv1443060804=89, srv1997063872=195, srv404426071=263, srv1443287861=90, srv695697141=320, srv636958174=310, srv1105584096=22, srv583005569=302, srv92523166=384, srv330226906=251, srv1684865692=133, srv381463497=258, srv567942525=297, srv1010403208=3, srv881516937=374, srv140693587=80, srv1872213858=172, srv262210172=234, srv846799674=358, srv851169364=360, srv880017865=372, srv129190288=58, srv401606217=262, srv669535820=317, srv1325384866=64, srv1377673856=73, srv1416276025=85, srv430431276=266, srv81513922=353, srv2044458062=201, srv2118166427=214, srv1665530216=125, srv2045587532=202, srv1824773168=164, srv2071913725=208, srv1295499145=60, srv1780304939=155, srv612277490=306, srv102508625=6, srv1637539828=115, srv820424989=355, srv50966795=279, srv1950402166=188, srv1207208580=42, srv1057648579=16, srv1084295726=20, srv39165764=260, srv959379519=387, srv2066402828=207, srv1556810592=103, srv1232731779=46, srv1606144164=110, srv1487275322=95, srv519310224=284, srv775221203=338, srv1079168923=19, srv1957834842=189, srv866525142=367, srv243907419=229, srv248553307=230, srv344122075=252, srv467461515=273, srv805609280=349, srv1018507425=4, srv1827511993=166, srv1704639485=137, srv855754935=362, srv1057024901=15, srv1116429721=24, srv927375731=385, srv1383836323=76, srv1584407048=107, srv809779157=351, srv1786622589=159, srv869541705=368, srv1123072042=25, srv1726136626=142, srv135800579=67, srv1958676591=191, srv390748718=259, srv907223095=378, srv76871917=336, srv1160170031=29, srv2119727728=215, srv918100507=381, srv1352063642=66, srv1975716907=193} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-17 21:53:14,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-17 21:53:14,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-17 21:53:14,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-17 21:53:14,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-17 21:53:14,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-17 21:53:14,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-17 21:53:14,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-17 21:53:14,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-17 21:53:14,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-17 21:53:14,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-17 21:53:14,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-17 21:53:14,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-17 21:53:14,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-17 21:53:14,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-17 21:53:14,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-17 21:53:14,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-17 21:53:14,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-17 21:53:14,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-17 21:53:14,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-17 21:53:14,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-17 21:53:14,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-17 21:53:14,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-17 21:53:14,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-17 21:53:14,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-17 21:53:14,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-17 21:53:14,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-17 21:53:14,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-17 21:53:14,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-17 21:53:14,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-17 21:53:14,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-17 21:53:14,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-17 21:53:14,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-17 21:53:14,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-17 21:53:14,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-17 21:53:14,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-17 21:53:14,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-17 21:53:14,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-17 21:53:14,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-17 21:53:14,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-17 21:53:14,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-17 21:53:14,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-17 21:53:14,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-17 21:53:14,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-17 21:53:14,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-17 21:53:14,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-17 21:53:14,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-17 21:53:14,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-17 21:53:14,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-17 21:53:14,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-17 21:53:14,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-17 21:53:14,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-17 21:53:14,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-17 21:53:14,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-17 21:53:14,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-17 21:53:14,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-17 21:53:14,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-17 21:53:14,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-17 21:53:14,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-17 21:53:14,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-17 21:53:14,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-17 21:53:14,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-17 21:53:14,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-17 21:53:14,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-17 21:53:14,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-17 21:53:14,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-17 21:53:14,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-17 21:53:14,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-17 21:53:14,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-17 21:53:14,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-17 21:53:14,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-17 21:53:14,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-17 21:53:14,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-17 21:53:14,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-17 21:53:14,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-17 21:53:14,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-17 21:53:14,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-17 21:53:14,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-17 21:53:14,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-17 21:53:14,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-17 21:53:14,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-17 21:53:14,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-17 21:53:14,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-17 21:53:14,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-17 21:53:14,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-17 21:53:14,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-17 21:53:14,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-17 21:53:14,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-17 21:53:14,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-17 21:53:14,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-17 21:53:14,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-17 21:53:14,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-17 21:53:14,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-17 21:53:14,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-17 21:53:14,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-17 21:53:14,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-17 21:53:14,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-17 21:53:14,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-17 21:53:14,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-17 21:53:14,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-17 21:53:14,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-17 21:53:14,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-17 21:53:14,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-17 21:53:14,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-17 21:53:14,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-17 21:53:14,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-17 21:53:14,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-17 21:53:14,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-17 21:53:14,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-17 21:53:14,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-17 21:53:14,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-17 21:53:14,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-17 21:53:14,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-17 21:53:14,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-17 21:53:14,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-17 21:53:14,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-17 21:53:14,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-17 21:53:14,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-17 21:53:14,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-17 21:53:14,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-17 21:53:14,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-17 21:53:14,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-17 21:53:14,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-17 21:53:14,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-17 21:53:14,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-17 21:53:14,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-17 21:53:14,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-17 21:53:14,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-17 21:53:14,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-17 21:53:14,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-17 21:53:14,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-17 21:53:14,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-17 21:53:14,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-17 21:53:14,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-17 21:53:14,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-17 21:53:14,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-17 21:53:14,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-17 21:53:14,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-17 21:53:14,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-17 21:53:14,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-17 21:53:14,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-17 21:53:14,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-17 21:53:14,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-17 21:53:14,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-17 21:53:14,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-17 21:53:14,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-17 21:53:14,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-17 21:53:14,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-17 21:53:14,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-17 21:53:14,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-17 21:53:14,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-17 21:53:14,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-17 21:53:14,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-17 21:53:14,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-17 21:53:14,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-17 21:53:14,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-17 21:53:14,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-17 21:53:14,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-17 21:53:14,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-17 21:53:14,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-17 21:53:14,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-17 21:53:14,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-17 21:53:14,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-17 21:53:14,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-17 21:53:14,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-17 21:53:14,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-17 21:53:14,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-17 21:53:14,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-17 21:53:14,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-17 21:53:14,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-17 21:53:14,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-17 21:53:14,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-17 21:53:14,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-17 21:53:14,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-17 21:53:14,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-17 21:53:14,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-17 21:53:14,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-17 21:53:14,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-17 21:53:14,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-17 21:53:14,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-17 21:53:14,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-17 21:53:14,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-17 21:53:14,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-17 21:53:14,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-17 21:53:14,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-17 21:53:14,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-17 21:53:14,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-17 21:53:14,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-17 21:53:14,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-17 21:53:14,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-17 21:53:14,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-17 21:53:14,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-17 21:53:14,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-17 21:53:14,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-17 21:53:14,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-17 21:53:14,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-17 21:53:14,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-17 21:53:14,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-17 21:53:14,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-17 21:53:14,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-17 21:53:14,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-17 21:53:14,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-17 21:53:14,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-17 21:53:14,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-17 21:53:14,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-17 21:53:14,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-17 21:53:14,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-17 21:53:14,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-17 21:53:14,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-17 21:53:14,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-17 21:53:14,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-17 21:53:14,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-17 21:53:14,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-17 21:53:14,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-17 21:53:14,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-17 21:53:14,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-17 21:53:14,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-17 21:53:14,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-17 21:53:14,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-17 21:53:14,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-17 21:53:14,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-17 21:53:14,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-17 21:53:14,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-17 21:53:14,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-17 21:53:14,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-17 21:53:14,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-17 21:53:14,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-17 21:53:14,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-17 21:53:14,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-17 21:53:14,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-17 21:53:14,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-17 21:53:14,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-17 21:53:14,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-17 21:53:14,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-17 21:53:14,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-17 21:53:14,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-17 21:53:14,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-17 21:53:14,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-17 21:53:14,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-17 21:53:14,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-17 21:53:14,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-17 21:53:14,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-17 21:53:14,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-17 21:53:14,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-17 21:53:14,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-17 21:53:14,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-17 21:53:14,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-17 21:53:14,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-17 21:53:14,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-17 21:53:14,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-17 21:53:14,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-17 21:53:14,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-17 21:53:14,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-17 21:53:14,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-17 21:53:14,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-17 21:53:14,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-17 21:53:14,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-17 21:53:14,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-17 21:53:14,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-17 21:53:14,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-17 21:53:14,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-17 21:53:14,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-17 21:53:14,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-17 21:53:14,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-17 21:53:14,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-17 21:53:14,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-17 21:53:14,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-17 21:53:14,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-17 21:53:14,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-17 21:53:14,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-17 21:53:14,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-17 21:53:14,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-17 21:53:14,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-17 21:53:14,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-17 21:53:14,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-17 21:53:14,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-17 21:53:14,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-17 21:53:14,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-17 21:53:14,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-17 21:53:14,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-17 21:53:14,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-17 21:53:14,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-17 21:53:14,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-17 21:53:14,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-17 21:53:14,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-17 21:53:14,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-17 21:53:14,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-17 21:53:14,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-17 21:53:14,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-17 21:53:14,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-17 21:53:14,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-17 21:53:14,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-17 21:53:14,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-17 21:53:14,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-17 21:53:14,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-17 21:53:14,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-17 21:53:14,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-17 21:53:14,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-17 21:53:14,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-17 21:53:14,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-17 21:53:14,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-17 21:53:14,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-17 21:53:14,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-17 21:53:14,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-17 21:53:14,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-17 21:53:14,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-17 21:53:14,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-17 21:53:14,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-17 21:53:14,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-17 21:53:14,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-17 21:53:14,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-17 21:53:14,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-17 21:53:14,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-17 21:53:14,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-17 21:53:14,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-17 21:53:14,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-17 21:53:14,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-17 21:53:14,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-17 21:53:14,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-17 21:53:14,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-17 21:53:14,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-17 21:53:14,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-17 21:53:14,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-17 21:53:14,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-17 21:53:14,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-17 21:53:14,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-17 21:53:14,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-17 21:53:14,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-17 21:53:14,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-17 21:53:14,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-17 21:53:14,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-17 21:53:14,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-17 21:53:14,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-17 21:53:14,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-17 21:53:14,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-17 21:53:14,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-17 21:53:14,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-17 21:53:14,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-17 21:53:14,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-17 21:53:14,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-17 21:53:14,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-17 21:53:14,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-17 21:53:14,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-17 21:53:14,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-17 21:53:14,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-17 21:53:14,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-17 21:53:14,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-17 21:53:14,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-17 21:53:14,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-17 21:53:14,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-17 21:53:14,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-17 21:53:14,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-17 21:53:14,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-17 21:53:14,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-17 21:53:14,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-17 21:53:14,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-17 21:53:14,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-17 21:53:14,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-17 21:53:14,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-17 21:53:14,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-17 21:53:14,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-17 21:53:14,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-17 21:53:14,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-17 21:53:14,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-17 21:53:14,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-17 21:53:14,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-17 21:53:14,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-17 21:53:14,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-17 21:53:14,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-17 21:53:14,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-17 21:53:14,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-17 21:53:14,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-17 21:53:14,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-17 21:53:14,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-17 21:53:14,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-17 21:53:14,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-17 21:53:14,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-17 21:53:14,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-17 21:53:14,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-17 21:53:14,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-17 21:53:14,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-17 21:53:14,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-17 21:53:14,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-17 21:53:14,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,700 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table51) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,700 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table52
2023-07-17 21:53:14,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv871358531=369, srv64697211=312, srv653261481=314, srv1778141916=154, srv716510755=323, srv372169288=255, srv568235512=298, srv710229516=322, srv537137712=293, srv1682791519=131, srv642353994=311, srv1046656068=13, srv993792848=391, srv1202667070=39, srv99567927=392, srv1607947050=111, srv1677371877=129, srv1763526149=150, srv1763378353=149, srv531263272=289, srv448398842=270, srv802808934=348, srv77960001=340, srv453521623=271, srv162773041=114, srv563606057=295, srv1659238910=122, srv1279307656=55, srv1914255334=183, srv1296605582=61, srv2131597846=222, srv1375359355=72, srv1405269336=79, srv175680261=147, srv282211488=242, srv1412891098=82, srv375712549=257, srv191234370=182, srv1574132168=106, srv1853511149=168, srv617306884=307, srv268601623=238, srv1400099806=78, srv477381292=275, srv1279442050=56, srv535853198=292, srv1767480590=152, srv2100700333=211, srv1187847151=37, srv791064637=345, srv74478935=330, srv1206084762=41, srv1497856295=97, srv897884865=377, srv398014971=261, srv786136704=342, srv1429879791=86, srv1201763981=38, srv1415213844=84, srv302220908=243, srv156683359=105, srv1974497084=192, srv535358845=291, srv627763604=308, srv732106437=326, srv1679724304=130, srv576770232=299, srv478480013=276, srv1237250370=47, srv1169018295=34, srv32320833=248, srv594880186=304, srv216306370=225, srv656484240=315, srv818754908=354, srv1321058011=63, srv1256345927=52, srv1670847243=126, srv1515243164=99, srv1781378955=156, srv508388209=278, srv1910886192=180, srv1718898730=139, srv772274482=337, srv1433624807=87, srv848605385=359, srv2107957639=212, srv270591905=240, srv2126706298=219, srv2080681743=209, srv1683990934=132, srv11526364=28, srv761020484=334, srv1720507603=141, srv266276730=236, srv935213051=386, srv923440665=383, srv1911104834=181, srv1944131651=187, srv1162841146=30, srv1921230216=185, srv319459319=247, srv1168022226=33, srv57689659=300, srv716533901=324, srv1255156178=50, srv441379967=267, srv806979625=350, srv788255577=344, srv976533744=389, srv1317853355=62, srv1491073587=96, srv777865249=339, srv2130226580=221, srv873230355=370, srv971370780=388, srv2008207413=197, srv989150800=390, srv737980208=328, srv862088563=363, srv1716783669=138, srv1801293056=160, srv1363984373=68, srv515711115=282, srv1378945327=75, srv17002515=136, srv853498273=361, srv1825292480=165, srv2124576425=217, srv1889349340=175, srv527691188=286, srv1226737728=44, srv1781498156=157, srv104267960=11, srv1663644309=124, srv1672213768=127, srv740402944=329, srv555807163=294, srv566277037=296, srv734882045=327, srv1143683685=27, srv1021400966=5, srv694407347=319, srv1626790310=113, srv303328507=244, srv1869166689=171, srv781623755=341, srv40741117=264, srv1958265988=190, srv592380483=303, srv483565354=277, srv1531731329=100, srv359746409=253, srv1271131029=54, srv1007512250=2, srv1783696565=158, srv1284150263=57, srv1648846971=118, srv120365207=40, srv263085176=235, srv535080964=290, srv824739010=357, srv744793832=331, srv1073394883=18, srv1113186104=23, srv1370321362=69, srv328204461=249, srv1604342762=109, srv266460489=237, srv313806624=245, srv1473408823=93, srv865692144=366, srv42814401=265, srv104065318=10, srv1599236554=108, srv1476834435=94, srv1673452142=128, srv716892727=325, srv1501773847=98, srv791504502=346, srv367902453=254, srv254349567=232, srv2126102976=218, srv252714068=231, srv916506189=380, srv687320190=318, srv1000433998=0, srv51396503=281, srv648464134=313, srv908419423=379, srv204022732=200, srv1901650254=177, srv200342397=196, srv765841762=335, srv1849125656=167, srv235281774=226, srv2137298641=224, srv517347076=283, srv1687711069=135, srv800105834=347, srv1609917009=112, srv1038797815=9, srv863216619=365, srv921796978=382, srv895924009=376, srv319002955=246, srv611122413=305, srv1942590787=186, srv529333113=288, srv1053973741=14, srv1988512138=194, srv1037112526=8, srv442327402=268, srv2062351281=204, srv1240518778=48, srv471289019=274, srv1857090224=170, srv1543025253=101, srv1915241294=184, srv238420451=228, srv1747796150=145, srv1101668258=21, srv1437034663=88, srv1173449481=35, srv582652595=301, srv1739043021=144, srv1733173130=143, srv465824154=272, srv14463216=91, srv1720161153=140, srv1549403995=102, srv235920151=227, srv1909060246=179, srv527988350=287, srv1801762669=161, srv89501442=375, srv442994824=269, srv1414012241=83, srv165153258=121, srv1766333515=151, srv2063438865=205, srv1071671801=17, srv1638570398=116, srv1035353226=7, srv1856921753=169, srv1887444158=173, srv1897306674=176, srv1255718022=51, srv1260078897=53, srv1372945218=70, srv1163715139=31, srv175471358=146, srv1558656747=104, srv1463869996=92, srv124825865=49, srv1142495625=26, srv1397803774=77, srv1644508836=117, srv1807320536=162, srv1165273546=32, srv1650978005=120, srv1374260725=71, srv2065239646=206, srv1685737274=134, srv878340336=371, srv329463090=250, srv2112675912=213, srv1378293943=74, srv787532288=343, srv1292867420=59, srv519831391=285, srv1002018470=1, srv822141051=356, srv1229740495=45, srv706370370=321, srv255741565=233, srv1177018836=36, srv1223505925=43, srv745532463=332, srv1820836786=163, srv2127145828=220, srv2124524081=216, srv665150476=316, srv2132621880=223, srv2051928856=203, srv1903063797=178, srv881186303=373, srv1758974023=148, srv270549378=239, srv2014789268=198, srv1663469360=123, srv1331983035=65, srv1768940632=153, srv2084732799=210, srv1043044287=12, srv630246195=309, srv86319792=364, srv37305654=256, srv1650394019=119, srv1888093001=174, srv512441512=280, srv813969264=352, srv277288989=241, srv2017714321=199, srv1410469782=81, srv751917673=333, srv1443060804=89, srv1997063872=195, srv404426071=263, srv1443287861=90, srv695697141=320, srv636958174=310, srv1105584096=22, srv583005569=302, srv92523166=384, srv330226906=251, srv1684865692=133, srv381463497=258, srv567942525=297, srv1010403208=3, srv881516937=374, srv140693587=80, srv1872213858=172, srv262210172=234, srv846799674=358, srv851169364=360, srv880017865=372, srv129190288=58, srv401606217=262, srv669535820=317, srv1325384866=64, srv1377673856=73, srv1416276025=85, srv430431276=266, srv81513922=353, srv2044458062=201, srv2118166427=214, srv1665530216=125, srv2045587532=202, srv1824773168=164, srv2071913725=208, srv1295499145=60, srv1780304939=155, srv612277490=306, srv102508625=6, srv1637539828=115, srv820424989=355, srv50966795=279, srv1950402166=188, srv1207208580=42, srv1057648579=16, srv1084295726=20, srv39165764=260, srv959379519=387, srv2066402828=207, srv1556810592=103, srv1232731779=46, srv1606144164=110, srv1487275322=95, srv519310224=284, srv775221203=338, srv1079168923=19, srv1957834842=189, srv866525142=367, srv243907419=229, srv248553307=230, srv344122075=252, srv467461515=273, srv805609280=349, srv1018507425=4, srv1827511993=166, srv1704639485=137, srv855754935=362, srv1057024901=15, srv1116429721=24, srv927375731=385, srv1383836323=76, srv1584407048=107, srv809779157=351, srv1786622589=159, srv869541705=368, srv1123072042=25, srv1726136626=142, srv135800579=67, srv1958676591=191, srv390748718=259, srv907223095=378, srv76871917=336, srv1160170031=29, srv2119727728=215, srv918100507=381, srv1352063642=66, srv1975716907=193} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-17 21:53:14,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-17 21:53:14,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-17 21:53:14,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-17 21:53:14,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-17 21:53:14,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-17 21:53:14,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-17 21:53:14,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-17 21:53:14,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-17 21:53:14,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-17 21:53:14,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-17 21:53:14,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-17 21:53:14,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-17 21:53:14,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-17 21:53:14,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-17 21:53:14,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-17 21:53:14,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-17 21:53:14,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-17 21:53:14,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-17 21:53:14,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-17 21:53:14,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-17 21:53:14,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-17 21:53:14,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-17 21:53:14,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-17 21:53:14,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-17 21:53:14,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-17 21:53:14,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-17 21:53:14,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-17 21:53:14,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-17 21:53:14,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-17 21:53:14,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-17 21:53:14,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-17 21:53:14,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-17 21:53:14,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-17 21:53:14,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-17 21:53:14,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-17 21:53:14,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-17 21:53:14,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-17 21:53:14,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-17 21:53:14,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-17 21:53:14,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-17 21:53:14,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-17 21:53:14,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-17 21:53:14,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-17 21:53:14,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-17 21:53:14,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-17 21:53:14,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-17 21:53:14,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-17 21:53:14,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-17 21:53:14,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-17 21:53:14,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-17 21:53:14,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-17 21:53:14,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-17 21:53:14,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-17 21:53:14,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-17 21:53:14,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-17 21:53:14,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-17 21:53:14,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-17 21:53:14,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-17 21:53:14,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-17 21:53:14,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-17 21:53:14,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-17 21:53:14,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-17 21:53:14,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-17 21:53:14,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-17 21:53:14,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-17 21:53:14,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-17 21:53:14,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-17 21:53:14,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-17 21:53:14,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-17 21:53:14,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-17 21:53:14,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-17 21:53:14,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-17 21:53:14,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-17 21:53:14,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-17 21:53:14,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-17 21:53:14,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-17 21:53:14,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-17 21:53:14,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-17 21:53:14,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-17 21:53:14,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-17 21:53:14,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-17 21:53:14,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-17 21:53:14,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-17 21:53:14,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-17 21:53:14,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-17 21:53:14,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-17 21:53:14,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-17 21:53:14,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-17 21:53:14,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-17 21:53:14,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-17 21:53:14,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-17 21:53:14,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-17 21:53:14,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-17 21:53:14,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-17 21:53:14,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-17 21:53:14,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-17 21:53:14,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-17 21:53:14,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-17 21:53:14,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-17 21:53:14,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-17 21:53:14,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-17 21:53:14,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-17 21:53:14,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-17 21:53:14,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-17 21:53:14,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-17 21:53:14,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-17 21:53:14,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-17 21:53:14,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-17 21:53:14,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-17 21:53:14,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-17 21:53:14,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-17 21:53:14,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-17 21:53:14,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-17 21:53:14,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-17 21:53:14,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-17 21:53:14,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-17 21:53:14,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-17 21:53:14,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-17 21:53:14,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-17 21:53:14,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-17 21:53:14,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-17 21:53:14,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-17 21:53:14,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-17 21:53:14,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-17 21:53:14,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-17 21:53:14,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-17 21:53:14,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-17 21:53:14,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-17 21:53:14,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-17 21:53:14,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-17 21:53:14,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-17 21:53:14,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-17 21:53:14,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-17 21:53:14,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-17 21:53:14,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-17 21:53:14,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-17 21:53:14,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-17 21:53:14,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-17 21:53:14,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-17 21:53:14,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-17 21:53:14,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-17 21:53:14,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-17 21:53:14,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-17 21:53:14,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-17 21:53:14,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-17 21:53:14,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-17 21:53:14,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-17 21:53:14,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-17 21:53:14,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-17 21:53:14,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-17 21:53:14,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-17 21:53:14,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-17 21:53:14,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-17 21:53:14,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-17 21:53:14,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-17 21:53:14,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-17 21:53:14,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-17 21:53:14,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-17 21:53:14,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-17 21:53:14,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-17 21:53:14,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-17 21:53:14,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-17 21:53:14,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-17 21:53:14,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-17 21:53:14,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-17 21:53:14,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-17 21:53:14,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-17 21:53:14,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-17 21:53:14,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-17 21:53:14,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-17 21:53:14,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-17 21:53:14,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-17 21:53:14,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-17 21:53:14,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-17 21:53:14,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-17 21:53:14,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-17 21:53:14,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-17 21:53:14,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-17 21:53:14,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-17 21:53:14,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-17 21:53:14,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-17 21:53:14,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-17 21:53:14,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-17 21:53:14,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-17 21:53:14,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-17 21:53:14,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-17 21:53:14,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-17 21:53:14,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-17 21:53:14,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-17 21:53:14,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-17 21:53:14,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-17 21:53:14,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-17 21:53:14,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-17 21:53:14,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-17 21:53:14,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-17 21:53:14,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-17 21:53:14,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-17 21:53:14,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-17 21:53:14,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-17 21:53:14,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-17 21:53:14,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-17 21:53:14,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-17 21:53:14,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-17 21:53:14,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-17 21:53:14,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-17 21:53:14,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-17 21:53:14,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-17 21:53:14,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-17 21:53:14,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-17 21:53:14,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-17 21:53:14,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-17 21:53:14,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-17 21:53:14,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-17 21:53:14,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-17 21:53:14,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-17 21:53:14,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-17 21:53:14,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-17 21:53:14,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-17 21:53:14,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-17 21:53:14,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-17 21:53:14,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-17 21:53:14,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-17 21:53:14,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-17 21:53:14,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-17 21:53:14,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-17 21:53:14,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-17 21:53:14,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-17 21:53:14,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-17 21:53:14,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-17 21:53:14,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-17 21:53:14,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-17 21:53:14,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-17 21:53:14,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-17 21:53:14,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-17 21:53:14,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-17 21:53:14,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-17 21:53:14,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-17 21:53:14,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-17 21:53:14,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-17 21:53:14,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-17 21:53:14,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-17 21:53:14,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-17 21:53:14,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-17 21:53:14,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-17 21:53:14,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-17 21:53:14,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-17 21:53:14,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-17 21:53:14,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-17 21:53:14,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-17 21:53:14,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-17 21:53:14,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-17 21:53:14,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-17 21:53:14,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-17 21:53:14,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-17 21:53:14,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-17 21:53:14,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-17 21:53:14,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-17 21:53:14,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-17 21:53:14,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-17 21:53:14,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-17 21:53:14,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-17 21:53:14,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-17 21:53:14,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-17 21:53:14,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-17 21:53:14,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-17 21:53:14,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-17 21:53:14,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-17 21:53:14,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-17 21:53:14,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-17 21:53:14,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-17 21:53:14,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-17 21:53:14,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-17 21:53:14,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-17 21:53:14,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-17 21:53:14,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-17 21:53:14,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-17 21:53:14,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-17 21:53:14,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-17 21:53:14,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-17 21:53:14,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-17 21:53:14,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-17 21:53:14,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-17 21:53:14,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-17 21:53:14,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-17 21:53:14,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-17 21:53:14,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-17 21:53:14,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-17 21:53:14,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-17 21:53:14,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-17 21:53:14,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-17 21:53:14,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-17 21:53:14,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-17 21:53:14,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-17 21:53:14,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-17 21:53:14,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-17 21:53:14,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-17 21:53:14,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-17 21:53:14,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-17 21:53:14,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-17 21:53:14,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-17 21:53:14,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-17 21:53:14,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-17 21:53:14,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-17 21:53:14,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-17 21:53:14,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-17 21:53:14,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-17 21:53:14,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-17 21:53:14,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-17 21:53:14,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-17 21:53:14,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-17 21:53:14,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-17 21:53:14,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-17 21:53:14,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-17 21:53:14,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-17 21:53:14,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-17 21:53:14,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-17 21:53:14,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-17 21:53:14,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-17 21:53:14,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-17 21:53:14,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-17 21:53:14,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-17 21:53:14,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-17 21:53:14,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-17 21:53:14,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-17 21:53:14,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-17 21:53:14,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-17 21:53:14,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-17 21:53:14,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-17 21:53:14,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-17 21:53:14,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-17 21:53:14,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-17 21:53:14,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-17 21:53:14,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-17 21:53:14,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-17 21:53:14,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-17 21:53:14,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-17 21:53:14,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-17 21:53:14,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-17 21:53:14,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-17 21:53:14,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-17 21:53:14,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-17 21:53:14,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-17 21:53:14,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-17 21:53:14,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-17 21:53:14,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-17 21:53:14,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-17 21:53:14,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-17 21:53:14,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-17 21:53:14,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-17 21:53:14,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-17 21:53:14,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-17 21:53:14,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-17 21:53:14,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-17 21:53:14,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-17 21:53:14,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-17 21:53:14,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-17 21:53:14,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-17 21:53:14,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-17 21:53:14,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-17 21:53:14,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-17 21:53:14,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-17 21:53:14,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-17 21:53:14,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-17 21:53:14,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-17 21:53:14,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-17 21:53:14,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-17 21:53:14,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-17 21:53:14,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-17 21:53:14,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-17 21:53:14,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-17 21:53:14,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-17 21:53:14,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-17 21:53:14,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-17 21:53:14,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-17 21:53:14,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-17 21:53:14,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-17 21:53:14,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-17 21:53:14,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-17 21:53:14,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-17 21:53:14,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-17 21:53:14,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-17 21:53:14,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-17 21:53:14,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,715 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table52) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,715 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table53
2023-07-17 21:53:14,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv871358531=369, srv64697211=312, srv653261481=314, srv1778141916=154, srv716510755=323, srv372169288=255, srv568235512=298, srv710229516=322, srv537137712=293, srv1682791519=131, srv642353994=311, srv1046656068=13, srv993792848=391, srv1202667070=39, srv99567927=392, srv1607947050=111, srv1677371877=129, srv1763526149=150, srv1763378353=149, srv531263272=289, srv448398842=270, srv802808934=348, srv77960001=340, srv453521623=271, srv162773041=114, srv563606057=295, srv1659238910=122, srv1279307656=55, srv1914255334=183, srv1296605582=61, srv2131597846=222, srv1375359355=72, srv1405269336=79, srv175680261=147, srv282211488=242, srv1412891098=82, srv375712549=257, srv191234370=182, srv1574132168=106, srv1853511149=168, srv617306884=307, srv268601623=238, srv1400099806=78, srv477381292=275, srv1279442050=56, srv535853198=292, srv1767480590=152, srv2100700333=211, srv1187847151=37, srv791064637=345, srv74478935=330, srv1206084762=41, srv1497856295=97, srv897884865=377, srv398014971=261, srv786136704=342, srv1429879791=86, srv1201763981=38, srv1415213844=84, srv302220908=243, srv156683359=105, srv1974497084=192, srv535358845=291, srv627763604=308, srv732106437=326, srv1679724304=130, srv576770232=299, srv478480013=276, srv1237250370=47, srv1169018295=34, srv32320833=248, srv594880186=304, srv216306370=225, srv656484240=315, srv818754908=354, srv1321058011=63, srv1256345927=52, srv1670847243=126, srv1515243164=99, srv1781378955=156, srv508388209=278, srv1910886192=180, srv1718898730=139, srv772274482=337, srv1433624807=87, srv848605385=359, srv2107957639=212, srv270591905=240, srv2126706298=219, srv2080681743=209, srv1683990934=132, srv11526364=28, srv761020484=334, srv1720507603=141, srv266276730=236, srv935213051=386, srv923440665=383, srv1911104834=181, srv1944131651=187, srv1162841146=30, srv1921230216=185, srv319459319=247, srv1168022226=33, srv57689659=300, srv716533901=324, srv1255156178=50, srv441379967=267, srv806979625=350, srv788255577=344, srv976533744=389, srv1317853355=62, srv1491073587=96, srv777865249=339, srv2130226580=221, srv873230355=370, srv971370780=388, srv2008207413=197, srv989150800=390, srv737980208=328, srv862088563=363, srv1716783669=138, srv1801293056=160, srv1363984373=68, srv515711115=282, srv1378945327=75, srv17002515=136, srv853498273=361, srv1825292480=165, srv2124576425=217, srv1889349340=175, srv527691188=286, srv1226737728=44, srv1781498156=157, srv104267960=11, srv1663644309=124, srv1672213768=127, srv740402944=329, srv555807163=294, srv566277037=296, srv734882045=327, srv1143683685=27, srv1021400966=5, srv694407347=319, srv1626790310=113, srv303328507=244, srv1869166689=171, srv781623755=341, srv40741117=264, srv1958265988=190, srv592380483=303, srv483565354=277, srv1531731329=100, srv359746409=253, srv1271131029=54, srv1007512250=2, srv1783696565=158, srv1284150263=57, srv1648846971=118, srv120365207=40, srv263085176=235, srv535080964=290, srv824739010=357, srv744793832=331, srv1073394883=18, srv1113186104=23, srv1370321362=69, srv328204461=249, srv1604342762=109, srv266460489=237, srv313806624=245, srv1473408823=93, srv865692144=366, srv42814401=265, srv104065318=10, srv1599236554=108, srv1476834435=94, srv1673452142=128, srv716892727=325, srv1501773847=98, srv791504502=346, srv367902453=254, srv254349567=232, srv2126102976=218, srv252714068=231, srv916506189=380, srv687320190=318, srv1000433998=0, srv51396503=281, srv648464134=313, srv908419423=379, srv204022732=200, srv1901650254=177, srv200342397=196, srv765841762=335, srv1849125656=167, srv235281774=226, srv2137298641=224, srv517347076=283, srv1687711069=135, srv800105834=347, srv1609917009=112, srv1038797815=9, srv863216619=365, srv921796978=382, srv895924009=376, srv319002955=246, srv611122413=305, srv1942590787=186, srv529333113=288, srv1053973741=14, srv1988512138=194, srv1037112526=8, srv442327402=268, srv2062351281=204, srv1240518778=48, srv471289019=274, srv1857090224=170, srv1543025253=101, srv1915241294=184, srv238420451=228, srv1747796150=145, srv1101668258=21, srv1437034663=88, srv1173449481=35, srv582652595=301, srv1739043021=144, srv1733173130=143, srv465824154=272, srv14463216=91, srv1720161153=140, srv1549403995=102, srv235920151=227, srv1909060246=179, srv527988350=287, srv1801762669=161, srv89501442=375, srv442994824=269, srv1414012241=83, srv165153258=121, srv1766333515=151, srv2063438865=205, srv1071671801=17, srv1638570398=116, srv1035353226=7, srv1856921753=169, srv1887444158=173, srv1897306674=176, srv1255718022=51, srv1260078897=53, srv1372945218=70, srv1163715139=31, srv175471358=146, srv1558656747=104, srv1463869996=92, srv124825865=49, srv1142495625=26, srv1397803774=77, srv1644508836=117, srv1807320536=162, srv1165273546=32, srv1650978005=120, srv1374260725=71, srv2065239646=206, srv1685737274=134, srv878340336=371, srv329463090=250, srv2112675912=213, srv1378293943=74, srv787532288=343, srv1292867420=59, srv519831391=285, srv1002018470=1, srv822141051=356, srv1229740495=45, srv706370370=321, srv255741565=233, srv1177018836=36, srv1223505925=43, srv745532463=332, srv1820836786=163, srv2127145828=220, srv2124524081=216, srv665150476=316, srv2132621880=223, srv2051928856=203, srv1903063797=178, srv881186303=373, srv1758974023=148, srv270549378=239, srv2014789268=198, srv1663469360=123, srv1331983035=65, srv1768940632=153, srv2084732799=210, srv1043044287=12, srv630246195=309, srv86319792=364, srv37305654=256, srv1650394019=119, srv1888093001=174, srv512441512=280, srv813969264=352, srv277288989=241, srv2017714321=199, srv1410469782=81, srv751917673=333, srv1443060804=89, srv1997063872=195, srv404426071=263, srv1443287861=90, srv695697141=320, srv636958174=310, srv1105584096=22, srv583005569=302, srv92523166=384, srv330226906=251, srv1684865692=133, srv381463497=258, srv567942525=297, srv1010403208=3, srv881516937=374, srv140693587=80, srv1872213858=172, srv262210172=234, srv846799674=358, srv851169364=360, srv880017865=372, srv129190288=58, srv401606217=262, srv669535820=317, srv1325384866=64, srv1377673856=73, srv1416276025=85, srv430431276=266, srv81513922=353, srv2044458062=201, srv2118166427=214, srv1665530216=125, srv2045587532=202, srv1824773168=164, srv2071913725=208, srv1295499145=60, srv1780304939=155, srv612277490=306, srv102508625=6, srv1637539828=115, srv820424989=355, srv50966795=279, srv1950402166=188, srv1207208580=42, srv1057648579=16, srv1084295726=20, srv39165764=260, srv959379519=387, srv2066402828=207, srv1556810592=103, srv1232731779=46, srv1606144164=110, srv1487275322=95, srv519310224=284, srv775221203=338, srv1079168923=19, srv1957834842=189, srv866525142=367, srv243907419=229, srv248553307=230, srv344122075=252, srv467461515=273, srv805609280=349, srv1018507425=4, srv1827511993=166, srv1704639485=137, srv855754935=362, srv1057024901=15, srv1116429721=24, srv927375731=385, srv1383836323=76, srv1584407048=107, srv809779157=351, srv1786622589=159, srv869541705=368, srv1123072042=25, srv1726136626=142, srv135800579=67, srv1958676591=191, srv390748718=259, srv907223095=378, srv76871917=336, srv1160170031=29, srv2119727728=215, srv918100507=381, srv1352063642=66, srv1975716907=193} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-17 21:53:14,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-17 21:53:14,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-17 21:53:14,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-17 21:53:14,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-17 21:53:14,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-17 21:53:14,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-17 21:53:14,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-17 21:53:14,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-17 21:53:14,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-17 21:53:14,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-17 21:53:14,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-17 21:53:14,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-17 21:53:14,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-17 21:53:14,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-17 21:53:14,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-17 21:53:14,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-17 21:53:14,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-17 21:53:14,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-17 21:53:14,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-17 21:53:14,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-17 21:53:14,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-17 21:53:14,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-17 21:53:14,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-17 21:53:14,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-17 21:53:14,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-17 21:53:14,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-17 21:53:14,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-17 21:53:14,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-17 21:53:14,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-17 21:53:14,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-17 21:53:14,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-17 21:53:14,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-17 21:53:14,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-17 21:53:14,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-17 21:53:14,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-17 21:53:14,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-17 21:53:14,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-17 21:53:14,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-17 21:53:14,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-17 21:53:14,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-17 21:53:14,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-17 21:53:14,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-17 21:53:14,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-17 21:53:14,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-17 21:53:14,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-17 21:53:14,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-17 21:53:14,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-17 21:53:14,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-17 21:53:14,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-17 21:53:14,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-17 21:53:14,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-17 21:53:14,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-17 21:53:14,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-17 21:53:14,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-17 21:53:14,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-17 21:53:14,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-17 21:53:14,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-17 21:53:14,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-17 21:53:14,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-17 21:53:14,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-17 21:53:14,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-17 21:53:14,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-17 21:53:14,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-17 21:53:14,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-17 21:53:14,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-17 21:53:14,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-17 21:53:14,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-17 21:53:14,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-17 21:53:14,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-17 21:53:14,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-17 21:53:14,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-17 21:53:14,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-17 21:53:14,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-17 21:53:14,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-17 21:53:14,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-17 21:53:14,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-17 21:53:14,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-17 21:53:14,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-17 21:53:14,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-17 21:53:14,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-17 21:53:14,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-17 21:53:14,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-17 21:53:14,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-17 21:53:14,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-17 21:53:14,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-17 21:53:14,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-17 21:53:14,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-17 21:53:14,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-17 21:53:14,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-17 21:53:14,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-17 21:53:14,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-17 21:53:14,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-17 21:53:14,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-17 21:53:14,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-17 21:53:14,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-17 21:53:14,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-17 21:53:14,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-17 21:53:14,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-17 21:53:14,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-17 21:53:14,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-17 21:53:14,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-17 21:53:14,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-17 21:53:14,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-17 21:53:14,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-17 21:53:14,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-17 21:53:14,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-17 21:53:14,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-17 21:53:14,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-17 21:53:14,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-17 21:53:14,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-17 21:53:14,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-17 21:53:14,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-17 21:53:14,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-17 21:53:14,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-17 21:53:14,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-17 21:53:14,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-17 21:53:14,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-17 21:53:14,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-17 21:53:14,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-17 21:53:14,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-17 21:53:14,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-17 21:53:14,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-17 21:53:14,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-17 21:53:14,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-17 21:53:14,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-17 21:53:14,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-17 21:53:14,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-17 21:53:14,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-17 21:53:14,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-17 21:53:14,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-17 21:53:14,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-17 21:53:14,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-17 21:53:14,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-17 21:53:14,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-17 21:53:14,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-17 21:53:14,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-17 21:53:14,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-17 21:53:14,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-17 21:53:14,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-17 21:53:14,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-17 21:53:14,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-17 21:53:14,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-17 21:53:14,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-17 21:53:14,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-17 21:53:14,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-17 21:53:14,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-17 21:53:14,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-17 21:53:14,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-17 21:53:14,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-17 21:53:14,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-17 21:53:14,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-17 21:53:14,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-17 21:53:14,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-17 21:53:14,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-17 21:53:14,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-17 21:53:14,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-17 21:53:14,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-17 21:53:14,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-17 21:53:14,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-17 21:53:14,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-17 21:53:14,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-17 21:53:14,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-17 21:53:14,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-17 21:53:14,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-17 21:53:14,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-17 21:53:14,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-17 21:53:14,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-17 21:53:14,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-17 21:53:14,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-17 21:53:14,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-17 21:53:14,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-17 21:53:14,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-17 21:53:14,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-17 21:53:14,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-17 21:53:14,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-17 21:53:14,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-17 21:53:14,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-17 21:53:14,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-17 21:53:14,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-17 21:53:14,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-17 21:53:14,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-17 21:53:14,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-17 21:53:14,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-17 21:53:14,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-17 21:53:14,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-17 21:53:14,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-17 21:53:14,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-17 21:53:14,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-17 21:53:14,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-17 21:53:14,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-17 21:53:14,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-17 21:53:14,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-17 21:53:14,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-17 21:53:14,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-17 21:53:14,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-17 21:53:14,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-17 21:53:14,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-17 21:53:14,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-17 21:53:14,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-17 21:53:14,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-17 21:53:14,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-17 21:53:14,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-17 21:53:14,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-17 21:53:14,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-17 21:53:14,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-17 21:53:14,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-17 21:53:14,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-17 21:53:14,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-17 21:53:14,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-17 21:53:14,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-17 21:53:14,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-17 21:53:14,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-17 21:53:14,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-17 21:53:14,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-17 21:53:14,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-17 21:53:14,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-17 21:53:14,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-17 21:53:14,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-17 21:53:14,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-17 21:53:14,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-17 21:53:14,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-17 21:53:14,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-17 21:53:14,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-17 21:53:14,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-17 21:53:14,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-17 21:53:14,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-17 21:53:14,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-17 21:53:14,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-17 21:53:14,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-17 21:53:14,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-17 21:53:14,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-17 21:53:14,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-17 21:53:14,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-17 21:53:14,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-17 21:53:14,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-17 21:53:14,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-17 21:53:14,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-17 21:53:14,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-17 21:53:14,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-17 21:53:14,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-17 21:53:14,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-17 21:53:14,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-17 21:53:14,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-17 21:53:14,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-17 21:53:14,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-17 21:53:14,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-17 21:53:14,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-17 21:53:14,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-17 21:53:14,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-17 21:53:14,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-17 21:53:14,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-17 21:53:14,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-17 21:53:14,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-17 21:53:14,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-17 21:53:14,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-17 21:53:14,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-17 21:53:14,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-17 21:53:14,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-17 21:53:14,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-17 21:53:14,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-17 21:53:14,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-17 21:53:14,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-17 21:53:14,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-17 21:53:14,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-17 21:53:14,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-17 21:53:14,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-17 21:53:14,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-17 21:53:14,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-17 21:53:14,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-17 21:53:14,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-17 21:53:14,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-17 21:53:14,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-17 21:53:14,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-17 21:53:14,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-17 21:53:14,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-17 21:53:14,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-17 21:53:14,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-17 21:53:14,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-17 21:53:14,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-17 21:53:14,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-17 21:53:14,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-17 21:53:14,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-17 21:53:14,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-17 21:53:14,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-17 21:53:14,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-17 21:53:14,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-17 21:53:14,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-17 21:53:14,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-17 21:53:14,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-17 21:53:14,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-17 21:53:14,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-17 21:53:14,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-17 21:53:14,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-17 21:53:14,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-17 21:53:14,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-17 21:53:14,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-17 21:53:14,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-17 21:53:14,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-17 21:53:14,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-17 21:53:14,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-17 21:53:14,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-17 21:53:14,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-17 21:53:14,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-17 21:53:14,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-17 21:53:14,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-17 21:53:14,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-17 21:53:14,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-17 21:53:14,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-17 21:53:14,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-17 21:53:14,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-17 21:53:14,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-17 21:53:14,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-17 21:53:14,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-17 21:53:14,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-17 21:53:14,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-17 21:53:14,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-17 21:53:14,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-17 21:53:14,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-17 21:53:14,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-17 21:53:14,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-17 21:53:14,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-17 21:53:14,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-17 21:53:14,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-17 21:53:14,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-17 21:53:14,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-17 21:53:14,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-17 21:53:14,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-17 21:53:14,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-17 21:53:14,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-17 21:53:14,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-17 21:53:14,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-17 21:53:14,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-17 21:53:14,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-17 21:53:14,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-17 21:53:14,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-17 21:53:14,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-17 21:53:14,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-17 21:53:14,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-17 21:53:14,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-17 21:53:14,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-17 21:53:14,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-17 21:53:14,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-17 21:53:14,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-17 21:53:14,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-17 21:53:14,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-17 21:53:14,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-17 21:53:14,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-17 21:53:14,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-17 21:53:14,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-17 21:53:14,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-17 21:53:14,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-17 21:53:14,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-17 21:53:14,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-17 21:53:14,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-17 21:53:14,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-17 21:53:14,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-17 21:53:14,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-17 21:53:14,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-17 21:53:14,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-17 21:53:14,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-17 21:53:14,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-17 21:53:14,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-17 21:53:14,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-17 21:53:14,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-17 21:53:14,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-17 21:53:14,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-17 21:53:14,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-17 21:53:14,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-17 21:53:14,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-17 21:53:14,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-17 21:53:14,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-17 21:53:14,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-17 21:53:14,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-17 21:53:14,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-17 21:53:14,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-17 21:53:14,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-17 21:53:14,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-17 21:53:14,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-17 21:53:14,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-17 21:53:14,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-17 21:53:14,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-17 21:53:14,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-17 21:53:14,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,731 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table53) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,731 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table10
2023-07-17 21:53:14,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv871358531=369, srv64697211=312, srv653261481=314, srv1778141916=154, srv716510755=323, srv372169288=255, srv568235512=298, srv710229516=322, srv537137712=293, srv1682791519=131, srv642353994=311, srv1046656068=13, srv993792848=391, srv1202667070=39, srv99567927=392, srv1607947050=111, srv1677371877=129, srv1763526149=150, srv1763378353=149, srv531263272=289, srv448398842=270, srv802808934=348, srv77960001=340, srv453521623=271, srv162773041=114, srv563606057=295, srv1659238910=122, srv1279307656=55, srv1914255334=183, srv1296605582=61, srv2131597846=222, srv1375359355=72, srv1405269336=79, srv175680261=147, srv282211488=242, srv1412891098=82, srv375712549=257, srv191234370=182, srv1574132168=106, srv1853511149=168, srv617306884=307, srv268601623=238, srv1400099806=78, srv477381292=275, srv1279442050=56, srv535853198=292, srv1767480590=152, srv2100700333=211, srv1187847151=37, srv791064637=345, srv74478935=330, srv1206084762=41, srv1497856295=97, srv897884865=377, srv398014971=261, srv786136704=342, srv1429879791=86, srv1201763981=38, srv1415213844=84, srv302220908=243, srv156683359=105, srv1974497084=192, srv535358845=291, srv627763604=308, srv732106437=326, srv1679724304=130, srv576770232=299, srv478480013=276, srv1237250370=47, srv1169018295=34, srv32320833=248, srv594880186=304, srv216306370=225, srv656484240=315, srv818754908=354, srv1321058011=63, srv1256345927=52, srv1670847243=126, srv1515243164=99, srv1781378955=156, srv508388209=278, srv1910886192=180, srv1718898730=139, srv772274482=337, srv1433624807=87, srv848605385=359, srv2107957639=212, srv270591905=240, srv2126706298=219, srv2080681743=209, srv1683990934=132, srv11526364=28, srv761020484=334, srv1720507603=141, srv266276730=236, srv935213051=386, srv923440665=383, srv1911104834=181, srv1944131651=187, srv1162841146=30, srv1921230216=185, srv319459319=247, srv1168022226=33, srv57689659=300, srv716533901=324, srv1255156178=50, srv441379967=267, srv806979625=350, srv788255577=344, srv976533744=389, srv1317853355=62, srv1491073587=96, srv777865249=339, srv2130226580=221, srv873230355=370, srv971370780=388, srv2008207413=197, srv989150800=390, srv737980208=328, srv862088563=363, srv1716783669=138, srv1801293056=160, srv1363984373=68, srv515711115=282, srv1378945327=75, srv17002515=136, srv853498273=361, srv1825292480=165, srv2124576425=217, srv1889349340=175, srv527691188=286, srv1226737728=44, srv1781498156=157, srv104267960=11, srv1663644309=124, srv1672213768=127, srv740402944=329, srv555807163=294, srv566277037=296, srv734882045=327, srv1143683685=27, srv1021400966=5, srv694407347=319, srv1626790310=113, srv303328507=244, srv1869166689=171, srv781623755=341, srv40741117=264, srv1958265988=190, srv592380483=303, srv483565354=277, srv1531731329=100, srv359746409=253, srv1271131029=54, srv1007512250=2, srv1783696565=158, srv1284150263=57, srv1648846971=118, srv120365207=40, srv263085176=235, srv535080964=290, srv824739010=357, srv744793832=331, srv1073394883=18, srv1113186104=23, srv1370321362=69, srv328204461=249, srv1604342762=109, srv266460489=237, srv313806624=245, srv1473408823=93, srv865692144=366, srv42814401=265, srv104065318=10, srv1599236554=108, srv1476834435=94, srv1673452142=128, srv716892727=325, srv1501773847=98, srv791504502=346, srv367902453=254, srv254349567=232, srv2126102976=218, srv252714068=231, srv916506189=380, srv687320190=318, srv1000433998=0, srv51396503=281, srv648464134=313, srv908419423=379, srv204022732=200, srv1901650254=177, srv200342397=196, srv765841762=335, srv1849125656=167, srv235281774=226, srv2137298641=224, srv517347076=283, srv1687711069=135, srv800105834=347, srv1609917009=112, srv1038797815=9, srv863216619=365, srv921796978=382, srv895924009=376, srv319002955=246, srv611122413=305, srv1942590787=186, srv529333113=288, srv1053973741=14, srv1988512138=194, srv1037112526=8, srv442327402=268, srv2062351281=204, srv1240518778=48, srv471289019=274, srv1857090224=170, srv1543025253=101, srv1915241294=184, srv238420451=228, srv1747796150=145, srv1101668258=21, srv1437034663=88, srv1173449481=35, srv582652595=301, srv1739043021=144, srv1733173130=143, srv465824154=272, srv14463216=91, srv1720161153=140, srv1549403995=102, srv235920151=227, srv1909060246=179, srv527988350=287, srv1801762669=161, srv89501442=375, srv442994824=269, srv1414012241=83, srv165153258=121, srv1766333515=151, srv2063438865=205, srv1071671801=17, srv1638570398=116, srv1035353226=7, srv1856921753=169, srv1887444158=173, srv1897306674=176, srv1255718022=51, srv1260078897=53, srv1372945218=70, srv1163715139=31, srv175471358=146, srv1558656747=104, srv1463869996=92, srv124825865=49, srv1142495625=26, srv1397803774=77, srv1644508836=117, srv1807320536=162, srv1165273546=32, srv1650978005=120, srv1374260725=71, srv2065239646=206, srv1685737274=134, srv878340336=371, srv329463090=250, srv2112675912=213, srv1378293943=74, srv787532288=343, srv1292867420=59, srv519831391=285, srv1002018470=1, srv822141051=356, srv1229740495=45, srv706370370=321, srv255741565=233, srv1177018836=36, srv1223505925=43, srv745532463=332, srv1820836786=163, srv2127145828=220, srv2124524081=216, srv665150476=316, srv2132621880=223, srv2051928856=203, srv1903063797=178, srv881186303=373, srv1758974023=148, srv270549378=239, srv2014789268=198, srv1663469360=123, srv1331983035=65, srv1768940632=153, srv2084732799=210, srv1043044287=12, srv630246195=309, srv86319792=364, srv37305654=256, srv1650394019=119, srv1888093001=174, srv512441512=280, srv813969264=352, srv277288989=241, srv2017714321=199, srv1410469782=81, srv751917673=333, srv1443060804=89, srv1997063872=195, srv404426071=263, srv1443287861=90, srv695697141=320, srv636958174=310, srv1105584096=22, srv583005569=302, srv92523166=384, srv330226906=251, srv1684865692=133, srv381463497=258, srv567942525=297, srv1010403208=3, srv881516937=374, srv140693587=80, srv1872213858=172, srv262210172=234, srv846799674=358, srv851169364=360, srv880017865=372, srv129190288=58, srv401606217=262, srv669535820=317, srv1325384866=64, srv1377673856=73, srv1416276025=85, srv430431276=266, srv81513922=353, srv2044458062=201, srv2118166427=214, srv1665530216=125, srv2045587532=202, srv1824773168=164, srv2071913725=208, srv1295499145=60, srv1780304939=155, srv612277490=306, srv102508625=6, srv1637539828=115, srv820424989=355, srv50966795=279, srv1950402166=188, srv1207208580=42, srv1057648579=16, srv1084295726=20, srv39165764=260, srv959379519=387, srv2066402828=207, srv1556810592=103, srv1232731779=46, srv1606144164=110, srv1487275322=95, srv519310224=284, srv775221203=338, srv1079168923=19, srv1957834842=189, srv866525142=367, srv243907419=229, srv248553307=230, srv344122075=252, srv467461515=273, srv805609280=349, srv1018507425=4, srv1827511993=166, srv1704639485=137, srv855754935=362, srv1057024901=15, srv1116429721=24, srv927375731=385, srv1383836323=76, srv1584407048=107, srv809779157=351, srv1786622589=159, srv869541705=368, srv1123072042=25, srv1726136626=142, srv135800579=67, srv1958676591=191, srv390748718=259, srv907223095=378, srv76871917=336, srv1160170031=29, srv2119727728=215, srv918100507=381, srv1352063642=66, srv1975716907=193} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-17 21:53:14,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-17 21:53:14,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-17 21:53:14,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-17 21:53:14,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-17 21:53:14,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-17 21:53:14,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-17 21:53:14,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-17 21:53:14,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-17 21:53:14,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-17 21:53:14,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-17 21:53:14,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-17 21:53:14,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-17 21:53:14,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-17 21:53:14,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-17 21:53:14,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-17 21:53:14,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-17 21:53:14,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-17 21:53:14,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-17 21:53:14,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-17 21:53:14,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-17 21:53:14,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-17 21:53:14,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-17 21:53:14,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-17 21:53:14,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-17 21:53:14,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-17 21:53:14,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-17 21:53:14,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-17 21:53:14,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-17 21:53:14,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-17 21:53:14,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-17 21:53:14,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-17 21:53:14,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-17 21:53:14,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-17 21:53:14,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-17 21:53:14,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-17 21:53:14,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-17 21:53:14,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-17 21:53:14,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-17 21:53:14,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-17 21:53:14,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-17 21:53:14,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-17 21:53:14,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-17 21:53:14,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-17 21:53:14,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-17 21:53:14,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-17 21:53:14,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-17 21:53:14,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-17 21:53:14,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-17 21:53:14,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-17 21:53:14,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-17 21:53:14,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-17 21:53:14,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-17 21:53:14,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-17 21:53:14,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-17 21:53:14,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-17 21:53:14,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-17 21:53:14,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-17 21:53:14,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-17 21:53:14,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-17 21:53:14,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-17 21:53:14,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-17 21:53:14,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-17 21:53:14,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-17 21:53:14,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-17 21:53:14,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-17 21:53:14,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-17 21:53:14,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-17 21:53:14,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-17 21:53:14,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-17 21:53:14,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-17 21:53:14,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-17 21:53:14,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-17 21:53:14,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-17 21:53:14,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-17 21:53:14,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-17 21:53:14,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-17 21:53:14,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-17 21:53:14,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-17 21:53:14,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-17 21:53:14,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-17 21:53:14,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-17 21:53:14,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-17 21:53:14,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-17 21:53:14,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-17 21:53:14,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-17 21:53:14,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-17 21:53:14,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-17 21:53:14,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-17 21:53:14,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-17 21:53:14,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-17 21:53:14,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-17 21:53:14,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-17 21:53:14,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-17 21:53:14,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-17 21:53:14,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-17 21:53:14,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-17 21:53:14,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-17 21:53:14,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-17 21:53:14,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-17 21:53:14,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-17 21:53:14,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-17 21:53:14,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-17 21:53:14,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-17 21:53:14,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-17 21:53:14,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-17 21:53:14,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-17 21:53:14,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-17 21:53:14,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-17 21:53:14,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-17 21:53:14,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-17 21:53:14,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-17 21:53:14,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-17 21:53:14,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-17 21:53:14,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-17 21:53:14,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-17 21:53:14,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-17 21:53:14,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-17 21:53:14,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-17 21:53:14,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-17 21:53:14,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-17 21:53:14,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-17 21:53:14,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-17 21:53:14,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-17 21:53:14,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-17 21:53:14,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-17 21:53:14,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-17 21:53:14,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-17 21:53:14,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-17 21:53:14,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-17 21:53:14,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-17 21:53:14,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-17 21:53:14,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-17 21:53:14,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-17 21:53:14,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-17 21:53:14,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-17 21:53:14,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-17 21:53:14,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-17 21:53:14,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-17 21:53:14,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-17 21:53:14,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-17 21:53:14,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-17 21:53:14,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-17 21:53:14,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-17 21:53:14,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-17 21:53:14,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-17 21:53:14,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-17 21:53:14,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-17 21:53:14,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-17 21:53:14,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-17 21:53:14,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-17 21:53:14,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-17 21:53:14,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-17 21:53:14,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-17 21:53:14,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-17 21:53:14,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-17 21:53:14,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-17 21:53:14,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-17 21:53:14,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-17 21:53:14,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-17 21:53:14,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-17 21:53:14,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-17 21:53:14,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-17 21:53:14,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-17 21:53:14,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-17 21:53:14,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-17 21:53:14,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-17 21:53:14,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-17 21:53:14,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-17 21:53:14,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-17 21:53:14,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-17 21:53:14,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-17 21:53:14,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-17 21:53:14,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-17 21:53:14,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-17 21:53:14,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-17 21:53:14,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-17 21:53:14,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-17 21:53:14,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-17 21:53:14,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-17 21:53:14,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-17 21:53:14,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-17 21:53:14,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-17 21:53:14,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-17 21:53:14,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-17 21:53:14,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-17 21:53:14,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-17 21:53:14,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-17 21:53:14,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-17 21:53:14,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-17 21:53:14,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-17 21:53:14,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-17 21:53:14,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-17 21:53:14,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-17 21:53:14,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-17 21:53:14,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-17 21:53:14,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-17 21:53:14,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-17 21:53:14,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-17 21:53:14,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-17 21:53:14,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-17 21:53:14,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-17 21:53:14,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-17 21:53:14,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-17 21:53:14,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-17 21:53:14,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-17 21:53:14,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-17 21:53:14,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-17 21:53:14,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-17 21:53:14,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-17 21:53:14,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-17 21:53:14,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-17 21:53:14,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-17 21:53:14,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-17 21:53:14,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-17 21:53:14,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-17 21:53:14,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-17 21:53:14,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-17 21:53:14,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-17 21:53:14,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-17 21:53:14,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-17 21:53:14,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-17 21:53:14,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-17 21:53:14,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-17 21:53:14,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-17 21:53:14,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-17 21:53:14,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-17 21:53:14,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-17 21:53:14,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-17 21:53:14,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-17 21:53:14,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-17 21:53:14,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-17 21:53:14,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-17 21:53:14,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-17 21:53:14,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-17 21:53:14,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-17 21:53:14,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-17 21:53:14,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-17 21:53:14,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-17 21:53:14,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-17 21:53:14,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-17 21:53:14,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-17 21:53:14,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-17 21:53:14,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-17 21:53:14,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-17 21:53:14,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-17 21:53:14,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-17 21:53:14,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-17 21:53:14,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-17 21:53:14,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-17 21:53:14,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-17 21:53:14,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-17 21:53:14,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-17 21:53:14,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-17 21:53:14,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-17 21:53:14,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-17 21:53:14,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-17 21:53:14,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-17 21:53:14,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-17 21:53:14,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-17 21:53:14,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-17 21:53:14,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-17 21:53:14,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-17 21:53:14,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-17 21:53:14,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-17 21:53:14,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-17 21:53:14,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-17 21:53:14,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-17 21:53:14,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-17 21:53:14,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-17 21:53:14,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-17 21:53:14,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-17 21:53:14,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-17 21:53:14,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-17 21:53:14,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-17 21:53:14,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-17 21:53:14,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-17 21:53:14,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-17 21:53:14,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-17 21:53:14,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-17 21:53:14,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-17 21:53:14,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-17 21:53:14,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-17 21:53:14,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-17 21:53:14,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-17 21:53:14,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-17 21:53:14,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-17 21:53:14,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-17 21:53:14,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-17 21:53:14,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-17 21:53:14,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-17 21:53:14,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-17 21:53:14,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-17 21:53:14,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-17 21:53:14,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-17 21:53:14,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-17 21:53:14,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-17 21:53:14,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-17 21:53:14,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-17 21:53:14,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-17 21:53:14,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-17 21:53:14,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-17 21:53:14,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-17 21:53:14,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-17 21:53:14,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-17 21:53:14,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-17 21:53:14,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-17 21:53:14,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-17 21:53:14,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-17 21:53:14,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-17 21:53:14,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-17 21:53:14,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-17 21:53:14,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-17 21:53:14,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-17 21:53:14,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-17 21:53:14,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-17 21:53:14,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-17 21:53:14,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-17 21:53:14,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-17 21:53:14,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-17 21:53:14,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-17 21:53:14,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-17 21:53:14,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-17 21:53:14,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-17 21:53:14,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-17 21:53:14,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-17 21:53:14,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-17 21:53:14,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-17 21:53:14,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-17 21:53:14,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-17 21:53:14,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-17 21:53:14,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-17 21:53:14,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-17 21:53:14,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-17 21:53:14,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-17 21:53:14,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-17 21:53:14,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-17 21:53:14,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-17 21:53:14,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-17 21:53:14,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-17 21:53:14,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-17 21:53:14,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-17 21:53:14,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-17 21:53:14,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-17 21:53:14,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-17 21:53:14,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-17 21:53:14,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-17 21:53:14,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-17 21:53:14,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-17 21:53:14,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-17 21:53:14,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-17 21:53:14,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-17 21:53:14,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-17 21:53:14,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-17 21:53:14,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-17 21:53:14,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-17 21:53:14,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-17 21:53:14,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-17 21:53:14,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-17 21:53:14,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-17 21:53:14,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-17 21:53:14,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-17 21:53:14,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-17 21:53:14,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-17 21:53:14,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-17 21:53:14,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-17 21:53:14,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-17 21:53:14,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-17 21:53:14,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-17 21:53:14,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-17 21:53:14,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-17 21:53:14,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-17 21:53:14,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-17 21:53:14,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-17 21:53:14,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-17 21:53:14,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-17 21:53:14,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-17 21:53:14,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-17 21:53:14,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-17 21:53:14,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-17 21:53:14,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-17 21:53:14,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-17 21:53:14,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-17 21:53:14,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,750 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table10) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,750 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table54
2023-07-17 21:53:14,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv871358531=369, srv64697211=312, srv653261481=314, srv1778141916=154, srv716510755=323, srv372169288=255, srv568235512=298, srv710229516=322, srv537137712=293, srv1682791519=131, srv642353994=311, srv1046656068=13, srv993792848=391, srv1202667070=39, srv99567927=392, srv1607947050=111, srv1677371877=129, srv1763526149=150, srv1763378353=149, srv531263272=289, srv448398842=270, srv802808934=348, srv77960001=340, srv453521623=271, srv162773041=114, srv563606057=295, srv1659238910=122, srv1279307656=55, srv1914255334=183, srv1296605582=61, srv2131597846=222, srv1375359355=72, srv1405269336=79, srv175680261=147, srv282211488=242, srv1412891098=82, srv375712549=257, srv191234370=182, srv1574132168=106, srv1853511149=168, srv617306884=307, srv268601623=238, srv1400099806=78, srv477381292=275, srv1279442050=56, srv535853198=292, srv1767480590=152, srv2100700333=211, srv1187847151=37, srv791064637=345, srv74478935=330, srv1206084762=41, srv1497856295=97, srv897884865=377, srv398014971=261, srv786136704=342, srv1429879791=86, srv1201763981=38, srv1415213844=84, srv302220908=243, srv156683359=105, srv1974497084=192, srv535358845=291, srv627763604=308, srv732106437=326, srv1679724304=130, srv576770232=299, srv478480013=276, srv1237250370=47, srv1169018295=34, srv32320833=248, srv594880186=304, srv216306370=225, srv656484240=315, srv818754908=354, srv1321058011=63, srv1256345927=52, srv1670847243=126, srv1515243164=99, srv1781378955=156, srv508388209=278, srv1910886192=180, srv1718898730=139, srv772274482=337, srv1433624807=87, srv848605385=359, srv2107957639=212, srv270591905=240, srv2126706298=219, srv2080681743=209, srv1683990934=132, srv11526364=28, srv761020484=334, srv1720507603=141, srv266276730=236, srv935213051=386, srv923440665=383, srv1911104834=181, srv1944131651=187, srv1162841146=30, srv1921230216=185, srv319459319=247, srv1168022226=33, srv57689659=300, srv716533901=324, srv1255156178=50, srv441379967=267, srv806979625=350, srv788255577=344, srv976533744=389, srv1317853355=62, srv1491073587=96, srv777865249=339, srv2130226580=221, srv873230355=370, srv971370780=388, srv2008207413=197, srv989150800=390, srv737980208=328, srv862088563=363, srv1716783669=138, srv1801293056=160, srv1363984373=68, srv515711115=282, srv1378945327=75, srv17002515=136, srv853498273=361, srv1825292480=165, srv2124576425=217, srv1889349340=175, srv527691188=286, srv1226737728=44, srv1781498156=157, srv104267960=11, srv1663644309=124, srv1672213768=127, srv740402944=329, srv555807163=294, srv566277037=296, srv734882045=327, srv1143683685=27, srv1021400966=5, srv694407347=319, srv1626790310=113, srv303328507=244, srv1869166689=171, srv781623755=341, srv40741117=264, srv1958265988=190, srv592380483=303, srv483565354=277, srv1531731329=100, srv359746409=253, srv1271131029=54, srv1007512250=2, srv1783696565=158, srv1284150263=57, srv1648846971=118, srv120365207=40, srv263085176=235, srv535080964=290, srv824739010=357, srv744793832=331, srv1073394883=18, srv1113186104=23, srv1370321362=69, srv328204461=249, srv1604342762=109, srv266460489=237, srv313806624=245, srv1473408823=93, srv865692144=366, srv42814401=265, srv104065318=10, srv1599236554=108, srv1476834435=94, srv1673452142=128, srv716892727=325, srv1501773847=98, srv791504502=346, srv367902453=254, srv254349567=232, srv2126102976=218, srv252714068=231, srv916506189=380, srv687320190=318, srv1000433998=0, srv51396503=281, srv648464134=313, srv908419423=379, srv204022732=200, srv1901650254=177, srv200342397=196, srv765841762=335, srv1849125656=167, srv235281774=226, srv2137298641=224, srv517347076=283, srv1687711069=135, srv800105834=347, srv1609917009=112, srv1038797815=9, srv863216619=365, srv921796978=382, srv895924009=376, srv319002955=246, srv611122413=305, srv1942590787=186, srv529333113=288, srv1053973741=14, srv1988512138=194, srv1037112526=8, srv442327402=268, srv2062351281=204, srv1240518778=48, srv471289019=274, srv1857090224=170, srv1543025253=101, srv1915241294=184, srv238420451=228, srv1747796150=145, srv1101668258=21, srv1437034663=88, srv1173449481=35, srv582652595=301, srv1739043021=144, srv1733173130=143, srv465824154=272, srv14463216=91, srv1720161153=140, srv1549403995=102, srv235920151=227, srv1909060246=179, srv527988350=287, srv1801762669=161, srv89501442=375, srv442994824=269, srv1414012241=83, srv165153258=121, srv1766333515=151, srv2063438865=205, srv1071671801=17, srv1638570398=116, srv1035353226=7, srv1856921753=169, srv1887444158=173, srv1897306674=176, srv1255718022=51, srv1260078897=53, srv1372945218=70, srv1163715139=31, srv175471358=146, srv1558656747=104, srv1463869996=92, srv124825865=49, srv1142495625=26, srv1397803774=77, srv1644508836=117, srv1807320536=162, srv1165273546=32, srv1650978005=120, srv1374260725=71, srv2065239646=206, srv1685737274=134, srv878340336=371, srv329463090=250, srv2112675912=213, srv1378293943=74, srv787532288=343, srv1292867420=59, srv519831391=285, srv1002018470=1, srv822141051=356, srv1229740495=45, srv706370370=321, srv255741565=233, srv1177018836=36, srv1223505925=43, srv745532463=332, srv1820836786=163, srv2127145828=220, srv2124524081=216, srv665150476=316, srv2132621880=223, srv2051928856=203, srv1903063797=178, srv881186303=373, srv1758974023=148, srv270549378=239, srv2014789268=198, srv1663469360=123, srv1331983035=65, srv1768940632=153, srv2084732799=210, srv1043044287=12, srv630246195=309, srv86319792=364, srv37305654=256, srv1650394019=119, srv1888093001=174, srv512441512=280, srv813969264=352, srv277288989=241, srv2017714321=199, srv1410469782=81, srv751917673=333, srv1443060804=89, srv1997063872=195, srv404426071=263, srv1443287861=90, srv695697141=320, srv636958174=310, srv1105584096=22, srv583005569=302, srv92523166=384, srv330226906=251, srv1684865692=133, srv381463497=258, srv567942525=297, srv1010403208=3, srv881516937=374, srv140693587=80, srv1872213858=172, srv262210172=234, srv846799674=358, srv851169364=360, srv880017865=372, srv129190288=58, srv401606217=262, srv669535820=317, srv1325384866=64, srv1377673856=73, srv1416276025=85, srv430431276=266, srv81513922=353, srv2044458062=201, srv2118166427=214, srv1665530216=125, srv2045587532=202, srv1824773168=164, srv2071913725=208, srv1295499145=60, srv1780304939=155, srv612277490=306, srv102508625=6, srv1637539828=115, srv820424989=355, srv50966795=279, srv1950402166=188, srv1207208580=42, srv1057648579=16, srv1084295726=20, srv39165764=260, srv959379519=387, srv2066402828=207, srv1556810592=103, srv1232731779=46, srv1606144164=110, srv1487275322=95, srv519310224=284, srv775221203=338, srv1079168923=19, srv1957834842=189, srv866525142=367, srv243907419=229, srv248553307=230, srv344122075=252, srv467461515=273, srv805609280=349, srv1018507425=4, srv1827511993=166, srv1704639485=137, srv855754935=362, srv1057024901=15, srv1116429721=24, srv927375731=385, srv1383836323=76, srv1584407048=107, srv809779157=351, srv1786622589=159, srv869541705=368, srv1123072042=25, srv1726136626=142, srv135800579=67, srv1958676591=191, srv390748718=259, srv907223095=378, srv76871917=336, srv1160170031=29, srv2119727728=215, srv918100507=381, srv1352063642=66, srv1975716907=193} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-17 21:53:14,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-17 21:53:14,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-17 21:53:14,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-17 21:53:14,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-17 21:53:14,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-17 21:53:14,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-17 21:53:14,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-17 21:53:14,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-17 21:53:14,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-17 21:53:14,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-17 21:53:14,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-17 21:53:14,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-17 21:53:14,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-17 21:53:14,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-17 21:53:14,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-17 21:53:14,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-17 21:53:14,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-17 21:53:14,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-17 21:53:14,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-17 21:53:14,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-17 21:53:14,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-17 21:53:14,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-17 21:53:14,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-17 21:53:14,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-17 21:53:14,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-17 21:53:14,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-17 21:53:14,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-17 21:53:14,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-17 21:53:14,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-17 21:53:14,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-17 21:53:14,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-17 21:53:14,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-17 21:53:14,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-17 21:53:14,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-17 21:53:14,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-17 21:53:14,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-17 21:53:14,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-17 21:53:14,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-17 21:53:14,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-17 21:53:14,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-17 21:53:14,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-17 21:53:14,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-17 21:53:14,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-17 21:53:14,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-17 21:53:14,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-17 21:53:14,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-17 21:53:14,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-17 21:53:14,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-17 21:53:14,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-17 21:53:14,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-17 21:53:14,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-17 21:53:14,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-17 21:53:14,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-17 21:53:14,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-17 21:53:14,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-17 21:53:14,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-17 21:53:14,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-17 21:53:14,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-17 21:53:14,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-17 21:53:14,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-17 21:53:14,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-17 21:53:14,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-17 21:53:14,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-17 21:53:14,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-17 21:53:14,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-17 21:53:14,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-17 21:53:14,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-17 21:53:14,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-17 21:53:14,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-17 21:53:14,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-17 21:53:14,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-17 21:53:14,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-17 21:53:14,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-17 21:53:14,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-17 21:53:14,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-17 21:53:14,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-17 21:53:14,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-17 21:53:14,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-17 21:53:14,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-17 21:53:14,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-17 21:53:14,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-17 21:53:14,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-17 21:53:14,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-17 21:53:14,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-17 21:53:14,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-17 21:53:14,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-17 21:53:14,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-17 21:53:14,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-17 21:53:14,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-17 21:53:14,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-17 21:53:14,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-17 21:53:14,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-17 21:53:14,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-17 21:53:14,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-17 21:53:14,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-17 21:53:14,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-17 21:53:14,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-17 21:53:14,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-17 21:53:14,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-17 21:53:14,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-17 21:53:14,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-17 21:53:14,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-17 21:53:14,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-17 21:53:14,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-17 21:53:14,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-17 21:53:14,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-17 21:53:14,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-17 21:53:14,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-17 21:53:14,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-17 21:53:14,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-17 21:53:14,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-17 21:53:14,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-17 21:53:14,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-17 21:53:14,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-17 21:53:14,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-17 21:53:14,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-17 21:53:14,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-17 21:53:14,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-17 21:53:14,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-17 21:53:14,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-17 21:53:14,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-17 21:53:14,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-17 21:53:14,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-17 21:53:14,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-17 21:53:14,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-17 21:53:14,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-17 21:53:14,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-17 21:53:14,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-17 21:53:14,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-17 21:53:14,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-17 21:53:14,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-17 21:53:14,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-17 21:53:14,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-17 21:53:14,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-17 21:53:14,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-17 21:53:14,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-17 21:53:14,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-17 21:53:14,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-17 21:53:14,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-17 21:53:14,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-17 21:53:14,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-17 21:53:14,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-17 21:53:14,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-17 21:53:14,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-17 21:53:14,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-17 21:53:14,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-17 21:53:14,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-17 21:53:14,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-17 21:53:14,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-17 21:53:14,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-17 21:53:14,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-17 21:53:14,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-17 21:53:14,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-17 21:53:14,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-17 21:53:14,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-17 21:53:14,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-17 21:53:14,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-17 21:53:14,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-17 21:53:14,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-17 21:53:14,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-17 21:53:14,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-17 21:53:14,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-17 21:53:14,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-17 21:53:14,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-17 21:53:14,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-17 21:53:14,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-17 21:53:14,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-17 21:53:14,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-17 21:53:14,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-17 21:53:14,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-17 21:53:14,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-17 21:53:14,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-17 21:53:14,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-17 21:53:14,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-17 21:53:14,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-17 21:53:14,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-17 21:53:14,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-17 21:53:14,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-17 21:53:14,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-17 21:53:14,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-17 21:53:14,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-17 21:53:14,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-17 21:53:14,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-17 21:53:14,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-17 21:53:14,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-17 21:53:14,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-17 21:53:14,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-17 21:53:14,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-17 21:53:14,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-17 21:53:14,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-17 21:53:14,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-17 21:53:14,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-17 21:53:14,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-17 21:53:14,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-17 21:53:14,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-17 21:53:14,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-17 21:53:14,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-17 21:53:14,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-17 21:53:14,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-17 21:53:14,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-17 21:53:14,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-17 21:53:14,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-17 21:53:14,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-17 21:53:14,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-17 21:53:14,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-17 21:53:14,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-17 21:53:14,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-17 21:53:14,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-17 21:53:14,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-17 21:53:14,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-17 21:53:14,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-17 21:53:14,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-17 21:53:14,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-17 21:53:14,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-17 21:53:14,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-17 21:53:14,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-17 21:53:14,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-17 21:53:14,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-17 21:53:14,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-17 21:53:14,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-17 21:53:14,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-17 21:53:14,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-17 21:53:14,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-17 21:53:14,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-17 21:53:14,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-17 21:53:14,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-17 21:53:14,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-17 21:53:14,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-17 21:53:14,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-17 21:53:14,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-17 21:53:14,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-17 21:53:14,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-17 21:53:14,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-17 21:53:14,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-17 21:53:14,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-17 21:53:14,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-17 21:53:14,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-17 21:53:14,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-17 21:53:14,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-17 21:53:14,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-17 21:53:14,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-17 21:53:14,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-17 21:53:14,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-17 21:53:14,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-17 21:53:14,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-17 21:53:14,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-17 21:53:14,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-17 21:53:14,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-17 21:53:14,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-17 21:53:14,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-17 21:53:14,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-17 21:53:14,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-17 21:53:14,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-17 21:53:14,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-17 21:53:14,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-17 21:53:14,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-17 21:53:14,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-17 21:53:14,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-17 21:53:14,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-17 21:53:14,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-17 21:53:14,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-17 21:53:14,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-17 21:53:14,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-17 21:53:14,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-17 21:53:14,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-17 21:53:14,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-17 21:53:14,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-17 21:53:14,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-17 21:53:14,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-17 21:53:14,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-17 21:53:14,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-17 21:53:14,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-17 21:53:14,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-17 21:53:14,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-17 21:53:14,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-17 21:53:14,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-17 21:53:14,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-17 21:53:14,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-17 21:53:14,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-17 21:53:14,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-17 21:53:14,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-17 21:53:14,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-17 21:53:14,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-17 21:53:14,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-17 21:53:14,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-17 21:53:14,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-17 21:53:14,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-17 21:53:14,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-17 21:53:14,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-17 21:53:14,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-17 21:53:14,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-17 21:53:14,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-17 21:53:14,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-17 21:53:14,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-17 21:53:14,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-17 21:53:14,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-17 21:53:14,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-17 21:53:14,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-17 21:53:14,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-17 21:53:14,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-17 21:53:14,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-17 21:53:14,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-17 21:53:14,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-17 21:53:14,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-17 21:53:14,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-17 21:53:14,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-17 21:53:14,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-17 21:53:14,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-17 21:53:14,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-17 21:53:14,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-17 21:53:14,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-17 21:53:14,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-17 21:53:14,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-17 21:53:14,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-17 21:53:14,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-17 21:53:14,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-17 21:53:14,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-17 21:53:14,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-17 21:53:14,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-17 21:53:14,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-17 21:53:14,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-17 21:53:14,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-17 21:53:14,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-17 21:53:14,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-17 21:53:14,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-17 21:53:14,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-17 21:53:14,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-17 21:53:14,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-17 21:53:14,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-17 21:53:14,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-17 21:53:14,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-17 21:53:14,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-17 21:53:14,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-17 21:53:14,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-17 21:53:14,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-17 21:53:14,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-17 21:53:14,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-17 21:53:14,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-17 21:53:14,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-17 21:53:14,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-17 21:53:14,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-17 21:53:14,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-17 21:53:14,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-17 21:53:14,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-17 21:53:14,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-17 21:53:14,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-17 21:53:14,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-17 21:53:14,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-17 21:53:14,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-17 21:53:14,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-17 21:53:14,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-17 21:53:14,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-17 21:53:14,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-17 21:53:14,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-17 21:53:14,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-17 21:53:14,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-17 21:53:14,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-17 21:53:14,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-17 21:53:14,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-17 21:53:14,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-17 21:53:14,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-17 21:53:14,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-17 21:53:14,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-17 21:53:14,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-17 21:53:14,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-17 21:53:14,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-17 21:53:14,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-17 21:53:14,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-17 21:53:14,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-17 21:53:14,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-17 21:53:14,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-17 21:53:14,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-17 21:53:14,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-17 21:53:14,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-17 21:53:14,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-17 21:53:14,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-17 21:53:14,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-17 21:53:14,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-17 21:53:14,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-17 21:53:14,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-17 21:53:14,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-17 21:53:14,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-17 21:53:14,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,765 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table54) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,765 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table11
2023-07-17 21:53:14,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv871358531=369, srv64697211=312, srv653261481=314, srv1778141916=154, srv716510755=323, srv372169288=255, srv568235512=298, srv710229516=322, srv537137712=293, srv1682791519=131, srv642353994=311, srv1046656068=13, srv993792848=391, srv1202667070=39, srv99567927=392, srv1607947050=111, srv1677371877=129, srv1763526149=150, srv1763378353=149, srv531263272=289, srv448398842=270, srv802808934=348, srv77960001=340, srv453521623=271, srv162773041=114, srv563606057=295, srv1659238910=122, srv1279307656=55, srv1914255334=183, srv1296605582=61, srv2131597846=222, srv1375359355=72, srv1405269336=79, srv175680261=147, srv282211488=242, srv1412891098=82, srv375712549=257, srv191234370=182, srv1574132168=106, srv1853511149=168, srv617306884=307, srv268601623=238, srv1400099806=78, srv477381292=275, srv1279442050=56, srv535853198=292, srv1767480590=152, srv2100700333=211, srv1187847151=37, srv791064637=345, srv74478935=330, srv1206084762=41, srv1497856295=97, srv897884865=377, srv398014971=261, srv786136704=342, srv1429879791=86, srv1201763981=38, srv1415213844=84, srv302220908=243, srv156683359=105, srv1974497084=192, srv535358845=291, srv627763604=308, srv732106437=326, srv1679724304=130, srv576770232=299, srv478480013=276, srv1237250370=47, srv1169018295=34, srv32320833=248, srv594880186=304, srv216306370=225, srv656484240=315, srv818754908=354, srv1321058011=63, srv1256345927=52, srv1670847243=126, srv1515243164=99, srv1781378955=156, srv508388209=278, srv1910886192=180, srv1718898730=139, srv772274482=337, srv1433624807=87, srv848605385=359, srv2107957639=212, srv270591905=240, srv2126706298=219, srv2080681743=209, srv1683990934=132, srv11526364=28, srv761020484=334, srv1720507603=141, srv266276730=236, srv935213051=386, srv923440665=383, srv1911104834=181, srv1944131651=187, srv1162841146=30, srv1921230216=185, srv319459319=247, srv1168022226=33, srv57689659=300, srv716533901=324, srv1255156178=50, srv441379967=267, srv806979625=350, srv788255577=344, srv976533744=389, srv1317853355=62, srv1491073587=96, srv777865249=339, srv2130226580=221, srv873230355=370, srv971370780=388, srv2008207413=197, srv989150800=390, srv737980208=328, srv862088563=363, srv1716783669=138, srv1801293056=160, srv1363984373=68, srv515711115=282, srv1378945327=75, srv17002515=136, srv853498273=361, srv1825292480=165, srv2124576425=217, srv1889349340=175, srv527691188=286, srv1226737728=44, srv1781498156=157, srv104267960=11, srv1663644309=124, srv1672213768=127, srv740402944=329, srv555807163=294, srv566277037=296, srv734882045=327, srv1143683685=27, srv1021400966=5, srv694407347=319, srv1626790310=113, srv303328507=244, srv1869166689=171, srv781623755=341, srv40741117=264, srv1958265988=190, srv592380483=303, srv483565354=277, srv1531731329=100, srv359746409=253, srv1271131029=54, srv1007512250=2, srv1783696565=158, srv1284150263=57, srv1648846971=118, srv120365207=40, srv263085176=235, srv535080964=290, srv824739010=357, srv744793832=331, srv1073394883=18, srv1113186104=23, srv1370321362=69, srv328204461=249, srv1604342762=109, srv266460489=237, srv313806624=245, srv1473408823=93, srv865692144=366, srv42814401=265, srv104065318=10, srv1599236554=108, srv1476834435=94, srv1673452142=128, srv716892727=325, srv1501773847=98, srv791504502=346, srv367902453=254, srv254349567=232, srv2126102976=218, srv252714068=231, srv916506189=380, srv687320190=318, srv1000433998=0, srv51396503=281, srv648464134=313, srv908419423=379, srv204022732=200, srv1901650254=177, srv200342397=196, srv765841762=335, srv1849125656=167, srv235281774=226, srv2137298641=224, srv517347076=283, srv1687711069=135, srv800105834=347, srv1609917009=112, srv1038797815=9, srv863216619=365, srv921796978=382, srv895924009=376, srv319002955=246, srv611122413=305, srv1942590787=186, srv529333113=288, srv1053973741=14, srv1988512138=194, srv1037112526=8, srv442327402=268, srv2062351281=204, srv1240518778=48, srv471289019=274, srv1857090224=170, srv1543025253=101, srv1915241294=184, srv238420451=228, srv1747796150=145, srv1101668258=21, srv1437034663=88, srv1173449481=35, srv582652595=301, srv1739043021=144, srv1733173130=143, srv465824154=272, srv14463216=91, srv1720161153=140, srv1549403995=102, srv235920151=227, srv1909060246=179, srv527988350=287, srv1801762669=161, srv89501442=375, srv442994824=269, srv1414012241=83, srv165153258=121, srv1766333515=151, srv2063438865=205, srv1071671801=17, srv1638570398=116, srv1035353226=7, srv1856921753=169, srv1887444158=173, srv1897306674=176, srv1255718022=51, srv1260078897=53, srv1372945218=70, srv1163715139=31, srv175471358=146, srv1558656747=104, srv1463869996=92, srv124825865=49, srv1142495625=26, srv1397803774=77, srv1644508836=117, srv1807320536=162, srv1165273546=32, srv1650978005=120, srv1374260725=71, srv2065239646=206, srv1685737274=134, srv878340336=371, srv329463090=250, srv2112675912=213, srv1378293943=74, srv787532288=343, srv1292867420=59, srv519831391=285, srv1002018470=1, srv822141051=356, srv1229740495=45, srv706370370=321, srv255741565=233, srv1177018836=36, srv1223505925=43, srv745532463=332, srv1820836786=163, srv2127145828=220, srv2124524081=216, srv665150476=316, srv2132621880=223, srv2051928856=203, srv1903063797=178, srv881186303=373, srv1758974023=148, srv270549378=239, srv2014789268=198, srv1663469360=123, srv1331983035=65, srv1768940632=153, srv2084732799=210, srv1043044287=12, srv630246195=309, srv86319792=364, srv37305654=256, srv1650394019=119, srv1888093001=174, srv512441512=280, srv813969264=352, srv277288989=241, srv2017714321=199, srv1410469782=81, srv751917673=333, srv1443060804=89, srv1997063872=195, srv404426071=263, srv1443287861=90, srv695697141=320, srv636958174=310, srv1105584096=22, srv583005569=302, srv92523166=384, srv330226906=251, srv1684865692=133, srv381463497=258, srv567942525=297, srv1010403208=3, srv881516937=374, srv140693587=80, srv1872213858=172, srv262210172=234, srv846799674=358, srv851169364=360, srv880017865=372, srv129190288=58, srv401606217=262, srv669535820=317, srv1325384866=64, srv1377673856=73, srv1416276025=85, srv430431276=266, srv81513922=353, srv2044458062=201, srv2118166427=214, srv1665530216=125, srv2045587532=202, srv1824773168=164, srv2071913725=208, srv1295499145=60, srv1780304939=155, srv612277490=306, srv102508625=6, srv1637539828=115, srv820424989=355, srv50966795=279, srv1950402166=188, srv1207208580=42, srv1057648579=16, srv1084295726=20, srv39165764=260, srv959379519=387, srv2066402828=207, srv1556810592=103, srv1232731779=46, srv1606144164=110, srv1487275322=95, srv519310224=284, srv775221203=338, srv1079168923=19, srv1957834842=189, srv866525142=367, srv243907419=229, srv248553307=230, srv344122075=252, srv467461515=273, srv805609280=349, srv1018507425=4, srv1827511993=166, srv1704639485=137, srv855754935=362, srv1057024901=15, srv1116429721=24, srv927375731=385, srv1383836323=76, srv1584407048=107, srv809779157=351, srv1786622589=159, srv869541705=368, srv1123072042=25, srv1726136626=142, srv135800579=67, srv1958676591=191, srv390748718=259, srv907223095=378, srv76871917=336, srv1160170031=29, srv2119727728=215, srv918100507=381, srv1352063642=66, srv1975716907=193} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-17 21:53:14,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-17 21:53:14,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-17 21:53:14,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-17 21:53:14,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-17 21:53:14,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-17 21:53:14,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-17 21:53:14,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-17 21:53:14,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-17 21:53:14,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-17 21:53:14,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-17 21:53:14,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-17 21:53:14,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-17 21:53:14,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-17 21:53:14,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-17 21:53:14,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-17 21:53:14,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-17 21:53:14,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-17 21:53:14,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-17 21:53:14,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-17 21:53:14,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-17 21:53:14,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-17 21:53:14,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-17 21:53:14,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-17 21:53:14,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-17 21:53:14,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-17 21:53:14,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-17 21:53:14,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-17 21:53:14,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-17 21:53:14,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-17 21:53:14,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-17 21:53:14,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-17 21:53:14,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-17 21:53:14,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-17 21:53:14,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-17 21:53:14,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-17 21:53:14,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-17 21:53:14,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-17 21:53:14,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-17 21:53:14,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-17 21:53:14,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-17 21:53:14,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-17 21:53:14,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-17 21:53:14,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-17 21:53:14,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-17 21:53:14,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-17 21:53:14,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-17 21:53:14,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-17 21:53:14,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-17 21:53:14,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-17 21:53:14,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-17 21:53:14,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-17 21:53:14,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-17 21:53:14,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-17 21:53:14,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-17 21:53:14,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-17 21:53:14,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-17 21:53:14,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-17 21:53:14,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-17 21:53:14,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-17 21:53:14,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-17 21:53:14,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-17 21:53:14,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-17 21:53:14,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-17 21:53:14,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-17 21:53:14,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-17 21:53:14,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-17 21:53:14,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-17 21:53:14,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-17 21:53:14,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-17 21:53:14,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-17 21:53:14,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-17 21:53:14,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-17 21:53:14,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-17 21:53:14,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-17 21:53:14,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-17 21:53:14,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-17 21:53:14,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-17 21:53:14,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-17 21:53:14,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-17 21:53:14,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-17 21:53:14,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-17 21:53:14,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-17 21:53:14,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-17 21:53:14,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-17 21:53:14,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-17 21:53:14,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-17 21:53:14,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-17 21:53:14,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-17 21:53:14,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-17 21:53:14,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-17 21:53:14,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-17 21:53:14,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-17 21:53:14,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-17 21:53:14,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-17 21:53:14,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-17 21:53:14,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-17 21:53:14,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-17 21:53:14,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-17 21:53:14,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-17 21:53:14,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-17 21:53:14,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-17 21:53:14,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-17 21:53:14,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-17 21:53:14,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-17 21:53:14,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-17 21:53:14,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-17 21:53:14,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-17 21:53:14,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-17 21:53:14,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-17 21:53:14,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-17 21:53:14,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-17 21:53:14,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-17 21:53:14,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-17 21:53:14,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-17 21:53:14,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-17 21:53:14,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-17 21:53:14,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-17 21:53:14,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-17 21:53:14,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-17 21:53:14,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-17 21:53:14,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-17 21:53:14,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-17 21:53:14,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-17 21:53:14,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-17 21:53:14,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-17 21:53:14,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-17 21:53:14,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-17 21:53:14,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-17 21:53:14,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-17 21:53:14,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-17 21:53:14,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-17 21:53:14,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-17 21:53:14,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-17 21:53:14,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-17 21:53:14,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-17 21:53:14,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-17 21:53:14,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-17 21:53:14,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-17 21:53:14,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-17 21:53:14,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-17 21:53:14,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-17 21:53:14,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-17 21:53:14,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-17 21:53:14,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-17 21:53:14,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-17 21:53:14,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-17 21:53:14,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-17 21:53:14,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-17 21:53:14,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-17 21:53:14,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-17 21:53:14,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-17 21:53:14,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-17 21:53:14,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-17 21:53:14,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-17 21:53:14,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-17 21:53:14,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-17 21:53:14,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-17 21:53:14,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-17 21:53:14,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-17 21:53:14,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-17 21:53:14,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-17 21:53:14,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-17 21:53:14,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-17 21:53:14,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-17 21:53:14,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-17 21:53:14,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-17 21:53:14,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-17 21:53:14,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-17 21:53:14,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-17 21:53:14,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-17 21:53:14,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-17 21:53:14,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-17 21:53:14,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-17 21:53:14,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-17 21:53:14,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-17 21:53:14,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-17 21:53:14,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-17 21:53:14,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-17 21:53:14,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-17 21:53:14,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-17 21:53:14,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-17 21:53:14,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-17 21:53:14,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-17 21:53:14,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-17 21:53:14,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-17 21:53:14,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-17 21:53:14,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-17 21:53:14,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-17 21:53:14,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-17 21:53:14,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-17 21:53:14,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-17 21:53:14,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-17 21:53:14,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-17 21:53:14,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-17 21:53:14,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-17 21:53:14,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-17 21:53:14,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-17 21:53:14,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-17 21:53:14,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-17 21:53:14,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-17 21:53:14,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-17 21:53:14,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-17 21:53:14,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-17 21:53:14,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-17 21:53:14,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-17 21:53:14,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-17 21:53:14,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-17 21:53:14,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-17 21:53:14,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-17 21:53:14,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-17 21:53:14,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-17 21:53:14,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-17 21:53:14,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-17 21:53:14,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-17 21:53:14,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-17 21:53:14,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-17 21:53:14,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-17 21:53:14,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-17 21:53:14,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-17 21:53:14,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-17 21:53:14,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-17 21:53:14,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-17 21:53:14,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-17 21:53:14,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-17 21:53:14,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-17 21:53:14,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-17 21:53:14,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-17 21:53:14,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-17 21:53:14,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-17 21:53:14,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-17 21:53:14,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-17 21:53:14,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-17 21:53:14,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-17 21:53:14,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-17 21:53:14,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-17 21:53:14,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-17 21:53:14,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-17 21:53:14,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-17 21:53:14,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-17 21:53:14,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-17 21:53:14,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-17 21:53:14,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-17 21:53:14,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-17 21:53:14,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-17 21:53:14,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-17 21:53:14,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-17 21:53:14,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-17 21:53:14,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-17 21:53:14,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-17 21:53:14,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-17 21:53:14,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-17 21:53:14,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-17 21:53:14,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-17 21:53:14,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-17 21:53:14,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-17 21:53:14,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-17 21:53:14,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-17 21:53:14,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-17 21:53:14,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-17 21:53:14,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-17 21:53:14,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-17 21:53:14,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-17 21:53:14,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-17 21:53:14,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-17 21:53:14,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-17 21:53:14,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-17 21:53:14,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-17 21:53:14,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-17 21:53:14,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-17 21:53:14,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-17 21:53:14,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-17 21:53:14,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-17 21:53:14,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-17 21:53:14,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-17 21:53:14,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-17 21:53:14,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-17 21:53:14,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-17 21:53:14,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-17 21:53:14,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-17 21:53:14,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-17 21:53:14,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-17 21:53:14,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-17 21:53:14,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-17 21:53:14,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-17 21:53:14,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-17 21:53:14,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-17 21:53:14,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-17 21:53:14,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-17 21:53:14,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-17 21:53:14,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-17 21:53:14,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-17 21:53:14,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-17 21:53:14,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-17 21:53:14,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-17 21:53:14,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-17 21:53:14,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-17 21:53:14,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-17 21:53:14,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-17 21:53:14,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-17 21:53:14,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-17 21:53:14,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-17 21:53:14,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-17 21:53:14,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-17 21:53:14,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-17 21:53:14,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-17 21:53:14,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-17 21:53:14,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-17 21:53:14,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-17 21:53:14,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-17 21:53:14,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-17 21:53:14,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-17 21:53:14,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-17 21:53:14,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-17 21:53:14,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-17 21:53:14,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-17 21:53:14,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-17 21:53:14,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-17 21:53:14,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-17 21:53:14,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-17 21:53:14,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-17 21:53:14,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-17 21:53:14,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-17 21:53:14,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-17 21:53:14,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-17 21:53:14,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-17 21:53:14,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-17 21:53:14,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-17 21:53:14,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-17 21:53:14,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-17 21:53:14,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-17 21:53:14,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-17 21:53:14,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-17 21:53:14,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-17 21:53:14,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-17 21:53:14,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-17 21:53:14,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-17 21:53:14,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-17 21:53:14,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-17 21:53:14,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-17 21:53:14,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-17 21:53:14,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-17 21:53:14,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-17 21:53:14,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-17 21:53:14,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-17 21:53:14,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-17 21:53:14,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-17 21:53:14,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-17 21:53:14,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-17 21:53:14,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-17 21:53:14,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-17 21:53:14,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-17 21:53:14,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-17 21:53:14,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-17 21:53:14,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-17 21:53:14,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-17 21:53:14,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-17 21:53:14,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-17 21:53:14,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-17 21:53:14,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-17 21:53:14,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-17 21:53:14,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-17 21:53:14,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-17 21:53:14,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-17 21:53:14,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-17 21:53:14,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-17 21:53:14,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-17 21:53:14,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-17 21:53:14,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-17 21:53:14,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-17 21:53:14,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-17 21:53:14,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-17 21:53:14,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-17 21:53:14,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-17 21:53:14,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-17 21:53:14,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-17 21:53:14,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-17 21:53:14,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-17 21:53:14,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-17 21:53:14,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-17 21:53:14,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-17 21:53:14,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-17 21:53:14,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-17 21:53:14,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,780 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table11) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,780 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table55
2023-07-17 21:53:14,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv871358531=369, srv64697211=312, srv653261481=314, srv1778141916=154, srv716510755=323, srv372169288=255, srv568235512=298, srv710229516=322, srv537137712=293, srv1682791519=131, srv642353994=311, srv1046656068=13, srv993792848=391, srv1202667070=39, srv99567927=392, srv1607947050=111, srv1677371877=129, srv1763526149=150, srv1763378353=149, srv531263272=289, srv448398842=270, srv802808934=348, srv77960001=340, srv453521623=271, srv162773041=114, srv563606057=295, srv1659238910=122, srv1279307656=55, srv1914255334=183, srv1296605582=61, srv2131597846=222, srv1375359355=72, srv1405269336=79, srv175680261=147, srv282211488=242, srv1412891098=82, srv375712549=257, srv191234370=182, srv1574132168=106, srv1853511149=168, srv617306884=307, srv268601623=238, srv1400099806=78, srv477381292=275, srv1279442050=56, srv535853198=292, srv1767480590=152, srv2100700333=211, srv1187847151=37, srv791064637=345, srv74478935=330, srv1206084762=41, srv1497856295=97, srv897884865=377, srv398014971=261, srv786136704=342, srv1429879791=86, srv1201763981=38, srv1415213844=84, srv302220908=243, srv156683359=105, srv1974497084=192, srv535358845=291, srv627763604=308, srv732106437=326, srv1679724304=130, srv576770232=299, srv478480013=276, srv1237250370=47, srv1169018295=34, srv32320833=248, srv594880186=304, srv216306370=225, srv656484240=315, srv818754908=354, srv1321058011=63, srv1256345927=52, srv1670847243=126, srv1515243164=99, srv1781378955=156, srv508388209=278, srv1910886192=180, srv1718898730=139, srv772274482=337, srv1433624807=87, srv848605385=359, srv2107957639=212, srv270591905=240, srv2126706298=219, srv2080681743=209, srv1683990934=132, srv11526364=28, srv761020484=334, srv1720507603=141, srv266276730=236, srv935213051=386, srv923440665=383, srv1911104834=181, srv1944131651=187, srv1162841146=30, srv1921230216=185, srv319459319=247, srv1168022226=33, srv57689659=300, srv716533901=324, srv1255156178=50, srv441379967=267, srv806979625=350, srv788255577=344, srv976533744=389, srv1317853355=62, srv1491073587=96, srv777865249=339, srv2130226580=221, srv873230355=370, srv971370780=388, srv2008207413=197, srv989150800=390, srv737980208=328, srv862088563=363, srv1716783669=138, srv1801293056=160, srv1363984373=68, srv515711115=282, srv1378945327=75, srv17002515=136, srv853498273=361, srv1825292480=165, srv2124576425=217, srv1889349340=175, srv527691188=286, srv1226737728=44, srv1781498156=157, srv104267960=11, srv1663644309=124, srv1672213768=127, srv740402944=329, srv555807163=294, srv566277037=296, srv734882045=327, srv1143683685=27, srv1021400966=5, srv694407347=319, srv1626790310=113, srv303328507=244, srv1869166689=171, srv781623755=341, srv40741117=264, srv1958265988=190, srv592380483=303, srv483565354=277, srv1531731329=100, srv359746409=253, srv1271131029=54, srv1007512250=2, srv1783696565=158, srv1284150263=57, srv1648846971=118, srv120365207=40, srv263085176=235, srv535080964=290, srv824739010=357, srv744793832=331, srv1073394883=18, srv1113186104=23, srv1370321362=69, srv328204461=249, srv1604342762=109, srv266460489=237, srv313806624=245, srv1473408823=93, srv865692144=366, srv42814401=265, srv104065318=10, srv1599236554=108, srv1476834435=94, srv1673452142=128, srv716892727=325, srv1501773847=98, srv791504502=346, srv367902453=254, srv254349567=232, srv2126102976=218, srv252714068=231, srv916506189=380, srv687320190=318, srv1000433998=0, srv51396503=281, srv648464134=313, srv908419423=379, srv204022732=200, srv1901650254=177, srv200342397=196, srv765841762=335, srv1849125656=167, srv235281774=226, srv2137298641=224, srv517347076=283, srv1687711069=135, srv800105834=347, srv1609917009=112, srv1038797815=9, srv863216619=365, srv921796978=382, srv895924009=376, srv319002955=246, srv611122413=305, srv1942590787=186, srv529333113=288, srv1053973741=14, srv1988512138=194, srv1037112526=8, srv442327402=268, srv2062351281=204, srv1240518778=48, srv471289019=274, srv1857090224=170, srv1543025253=101, srv1915241294=184, srv238420451=228, srv1747796150=145, srv1101668258=21, srv1437034663=88, srv1173449481=35, srv582652595=301, srv1739043021=144, srv1733173130=143, srv465824154=272, srv14463216=91, srv1720161153=140, srv1549403995=102, srv235920151=227, srv1909060246=179, srv527988350=287, srv1801762669=161, srv89501442=375, srv442994824=269, srv1414012241=83, srv165153258=121, srv1766333515=151, srv2063438865=205, srv1071671801=17, srv1638570398=116, srv1035353226=7, srv1856921753=169, srv1887444158=173, srv1897306674=176, srv1255718022=51, srv1260078897=53, srv1372945218=70, srv1163715139=31, srv175471358=146, srv1558656747=104, srv1463869996=92, srv124825865=49, srv1142495625=26, srv1397803774=77, srv1644508836=117, srv1807320536=162, srv1165273546=32, srv1650978005=120, srv1374260725=71, srv2065239646=206, srv1685737274=134, srv878340336=371, srv329463090=250, srv2112675912=213, srv1378293943=74, srv787532288=343, srv1292867420=59, srv519831391=285, srv1002018470=1, srv822141051=356, srv1229740495=45, srv706370370=321, srv255741565=233, srv1177018836=36, srv1223505925=43, srv745532463=332, srv1820836786=163, srv2127145828=220, srv2124524081=216, srv665150476=316, srv2132621880=223, srv2051928856=203, srv1903063797=178, srv881186303=373, srv1758974023=148, srv270549378=239, srv2014789268=198, srv1663469360=123, srv1331983035=65, srv1768940632=153, srv2084732799=210, srv1043044287=12, srv630246195=309, srv86319792=364, srv37305654=256, srv1650394019=119, srv1888093001=174, srv512441512=280, srv813969264=352, srv277288989=241, srv2017714321=199, srv1410469782=81, srv751917673=333, srv1443060804=89, srv1997063872=195, srv404426071=263, srv1443287861=90, srv695697141=320, srv636958174=310, srv1105584096=22, srv583005569=302, srv92523166=384, srv330226906=251, srv1684865692=133, srv381463497=258, srv567942525=297, srv1010403208=3, srv881516937=374, srv140693587=80, srv1872213858=172, srv262210172=234, srv846799674=358, srv851169364=360, srv880017865=372, srv129190288=58, srv401606217=262, srv669535820=317, srv1325384866=64, srv1377673856=73, srv1416276025=85, srv430431276=266, srv81513922=353, srv2044458062=201, srv2118166427=214, srv1665530216=125, srv2045587532=202, srv1824773168=164, srv2071913725=208, srv1295499145=60, srv1780304939=155, srv612277490=306, srv102508625=6, srv1637539828=115, srv820424989=355, srv50966795=279, srv1950402166=188, srv1207208580=42, srv1057648579=16, srv1084295726=20, srv39165764=260, srv959379519=387, srv2066402828=207, srv1556810592=103, srv1232731779=46, srv1606144164=110, srv1487275322=95, srv519310224=284, srv775221203=338, srv1079168923=19, srv1957834842=189, srv866525142=367, srv243907419=229, srv248553307=230, srv344122075=252, srv467461515=273, srv805609280=349, srv1018507425=4, srv1827511993=166, srv1704639485=137, srv855754935=362, srv1057024901=15, srv1116429721=24, srv927375731=385, srv1383836323=76, srv1584407048=107, srv809779157=351, srv1786622589=159, srv869541705=368, srv1123072042=25, srv1726136626=142, srv135800579=67, srv1958676591=191, srv390748718=259, srv907223095=378, srv76871917=336, srv1160170031=29, srv2119727728=215, srv918100507=381, srv1352063642=66, srv1975716907=193} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-17 21:53:14,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-17 21:53:14,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-17 21:53:14,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-17 21:53:14,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-17 21:53:14,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-17 21:53:14,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-17 21:53:14,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-17 21:53:14,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-17 21:53:14,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-17 21:53:14,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-17 21:53:14,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-17 21:53:14,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-17 21:53:14,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-17 21:53:14,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-17 21:53:14,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-17 21:53:14,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-17 21:53:14,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-17 21:53:14,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-17 21:53:14,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-17 21:53:14,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-17 21:53:14,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-17 21:53:14,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-17 21:53:14,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-17 21:53:14,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-17 21:53:14,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-17 21:53:14,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-17 21:53:14,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-17 21:53:14,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-17 21:53:14,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-17 21:53:14,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-17 21:53:14,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-17 21:53:14,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-17 21:53:14,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-17 21:53:14,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-17 21:53:14,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-17 21:53:14,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-17 21:53:14,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-17 21:53:14,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-17 21:53:14,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-17 21:53:14,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-17 21:53:14,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-17 21:53:14,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-17 21:53:14,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-17 21:53:14,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-17 21:53:14,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-17 21:53:14,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-17 21:53:14,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-17 21:53:14,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-17 21:53:14,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-17 21:53:14,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-17 21:53:14,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-17 21:53:14,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-17 21:53:14,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-17 21:53:14,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-17 21:53:14,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-17 21:53:14,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-17 21:53:14,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-17 21:53:14,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-17 21:53:14,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-17 21:53:14,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-17 21:53:14,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-17 21:53:14,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-17 21:53:14,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-17 21:53:14,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-17 21:53:14,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-17 21:53:14,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-17 21:53:14,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-17 21:53:14,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-17 21:53:14,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-17 21:53:14,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-17 21:53:14,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-17 21:53:14,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-17 21:53:14,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-17 21:53:14,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-17 21:53:14,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-17 21:53:14,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-17 21:53:14,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-17 21:53:14,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-17 21:53:14,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-17 21:53:14,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-17 21:53:14,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-17 21:53:14,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-17 21:53:14,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-17 21:53:14,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-17 21:53:14,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-17 21:53:14,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-17 21:53:14,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-17 21:53:14,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-17 21:53:14,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-17 21:53:14,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-17 21:53:14,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-17 21:53:14,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-17 21:53:14,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-17 21:53:14,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-17 21:53:14,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-17 21:53:14,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-17 21:53:14,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-17 21:53:14,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-17 21:53:14,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-17 21:53:14,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-17 21:53:14,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-17 21:53:14,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-17 21:53:14,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-17 21:53:14,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-17 21:53:14,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-17 21:53:14,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-17 21:53:14,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-17 21:53:14,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-17 21:53:14,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-17 21:53:14,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-17 21:53:14,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-17 21:53:14,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-17 21:53:14,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-17 21:53:14,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-17 21:53:14,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-17 21:53:14,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-17 21:53:14,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-17 21:53:14,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-17 21:53:14,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-17 21:53:14,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-17 21:53:14,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-17 21:53:14,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-17 21:53:14,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-17 21:53:14,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-17 21:53:14,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-17 21:53:14,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-17 21:53:14,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-17 21:53:14,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-17 21:53:14,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-17 21:53:14,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-17 21:53:14,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-17 21:53:14,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-17 21:53:14,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-17 21:53:14,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-17 21:53:14,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-17 21:53:14,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-17 21:53:14,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-17 21:53:14,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-17 21:53:14,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-17 21:53:14,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-17 21:53:14,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-17 21:53:14,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-17 21:53:14,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-17 21:53:14,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-17 21:53:14,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-17 21:53:14,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-17 21:53:14,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-17 21:53:14,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-17 21:53:14,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-17 21:53:14,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-17 21:53:14,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-17 21:53:14,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-17 21:53:14,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-17 21:53:14,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-17 21:53:14,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-17 21:53:14,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-17 21:53:14,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-17 21:53:14,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-17 21:53:14,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-17 21:53:14,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-17 21:53:14,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-17 21:53:14,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-17 21:53:14,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-17 21:53:14,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-17 21:53:14,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-17 21:53:14,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-17 21:53:14,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-17 21:53:14,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-17 21:53:14,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-17 21:53:14,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-17 21:53:14,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-17 21:53:14,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-17 21:53:14,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-17 21:53:14,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-17 21:53:14,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-17 21:53:14,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-17 21:53:14,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-17 21:53:14,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-17 21:53:14,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-17 21:53:14,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-17 21:53:14,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-17 21:53:14,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-17 21:53:14,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-17 21:53:14,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-17 21:53:14,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-17 21:53:14,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-17 21:53:14,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-17 21:53:14,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-17 21:53:14,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-17 21:53:14,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-17 21:53:14,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-17 21:53:14,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-17 21:53:14,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-17 21:53:14,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-17 21:53:14,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-17 21:53:14,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-17 21:53:14,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-17 21:53:14,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-17 21:53:14,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-17 21:53:14,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-17 21:53:14,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-17 21:53:14,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-17 21:53:14,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-17 21:53:14,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-17 21:53:14,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-17 21:53:14,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-17 21:53:14,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-17 21:53:14,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-17 21:53:14,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-17 21:53:14,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-17 21:53:14,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-17 21:53:14,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-17 21:53:14,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-17 21:53:14,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-17 21:53:14,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-17 21:53:14,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-17 21:53:14,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-17 21:53:14,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-17 21:53:14,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-17 21:53:14,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-17 21:53:14,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-17 21:53:14,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-17 21:53:14,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-17 21:53:14,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-17 21:53:14,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-17 21:53:14,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-17 21:53:14,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-17 21:53:14,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-17 21:53:14,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-17 21:53:14,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-17 21:53:14,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-17 21:53:14,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-17 21:53:14,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-17 21:53:14,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-17 21:53:14,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-17 21:53:14,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-17 21:53:14,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-17 21:53:14,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-17 21:53:14,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-17 21:53:14,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-17 21:53:14,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-17 21:53:14,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-17 21:53:14,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-17 21:53:14,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-17 21:53:14,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-17 21:53:14,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-17 21:53:14,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-17 21:53:14,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-17 21:53:14,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-17 21:53:14,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-17 21:53:14,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-17 21:53:14,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-17 21:53:14,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-17 21:53:14,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-17 21:53:14,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-17 21:53:14,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-17 21:53:14,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-17 21:53:14,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-17 21:53:14,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-17 21:53:14,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-17 21:53:14,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-17 21:53:14,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-17 21:53:14,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-17 21:53:14,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-17 21:53:14,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-17 21:53:14,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-17 21:53:14,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-17 21:53:14,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-17 21:53:14,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-17 21:53:14,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-17 21:53:14,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-17 21:53:14,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-17 21:53:14,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-17 21:53:14,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-17 21:53:14,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-17 21:53:14,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-17 21:53:14,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-17 21:53:14,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-17 21:53:14,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-17 21:53:14,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-17 21:53:14,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-17 21:53:14,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-17 21:53:14,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-17 21:53:14,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-17 21:53:14,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-17 21:53:14,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-17 21:53:14,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-17 21:53:14,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-17 21:53:14,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-17 21:53:14,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-17 21:53:14,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-17 21:53:14,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-17 21:53:14,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-17 21:53:14,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-17 21:53:14,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-17 21:53:14,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-17 21:53:14,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-17 21:53:14,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-17 21:53:14,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-17 21:53:14,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-17 21:53:14,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-17 21:53:14,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-17 21:53:14,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-17 21:53:14,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-17 21:53:14,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-17 21:53:14,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-17 21:53:14,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-17 21:53:14,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-17 21:53:14,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-17 21:53:14,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-17 21:53:14,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-17 21:53:14,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-17 21:53:14,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-17 21:53:14,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-17 21:53:14,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-17 21:53:14,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-17 21:53:14,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-17 21:53:14,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-17 21:53:14,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-17 21:53:14,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-17 21:53:14,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-17 21:53:14,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-17 21:53:14,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-17 21:53:14,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-17 21:53:14,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-17 21:53:14,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-17 21:53:14,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-17 21:53:14,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-17 21:53:14,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-17 21:53:14,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-17 21:53:14,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-17 21:53:14,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-17 21:53:14,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-17 21:53:14,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-17 21:53:14,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-17 21:53:14,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-17 21:53:14,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-17 21:53:14,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-17 21:53:14,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-17 21:53:14,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-17 21:53:14,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-17 21:53:14,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-17 21:53:14,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-17 21:53:14,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-17 21:53:14,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-17 21:53:14,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-17 21:53:14,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-17 21:53:14,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-17 21:53:14,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-17 21:53:14,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-17 21:53:14,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-17 21:53:14,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-17 21:53:14,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-17 21:53:14,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-17 21:53:14,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-17 21:53:14,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-17 21:53:14,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-17 21:53:14,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-17 21:53:14,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-17 21:53:14,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-17 21:53:14,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-17 21:53:14,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-17 21:53:14,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-17 21:53:14,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-17 21:53:14,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-17 21:53:14,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-17 21:53:14,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-17 21:53:14,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-17 21:53:14,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-17 21:53:14,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-17 21:53:14,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-17 21:53:14,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-17 21:53:14,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-17 21:53:14,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-17 21:53:14,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-17 21:53:14,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-17 21:53:14,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-17 21:53:14,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-17 21:53:14,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-17 21:53:14,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-17 21:53:14,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-17 21:53:14,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-17 21:53:14,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,796 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table55) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,796 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table12
2023-07-17 21:53:14,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv871358531=369, srv64697211=312, srv653261481=314, srv1778141916=154, srv716510755=323, srv372169288=255, srv568235512=298, srv710229516=322, srv537137712=293, srv1682791519=131, srv642353994=311, srv1046656068=13, srv993792848=391, srv1202667070=39, srv99567927=392, srv1607947050=111, srv1677371877=129, srv1763526149=150, srv1763378353=149, srv531263272=289, srv448398842=270, srv802808934=348, srv77960001=340, srv453521623=271, srv162773041=114, srv563606057=295, srv1659238910=122, srv1279307656=55, srv1914255334=183, srv1296605582=61, srv2131597846=222, srv1375359355=72, srv1405269336=79, srv175680261=147, srv282211488=242, srv1412891098=82, srv375712549=257, srv191234370=182, srv1574132168=106, srv1853511149=168, srv617306884=307, srv268601623=238, srv1400099806=78, srv477381292=275, srv1279442050=56, srv535853198=292, srv1767480590=152, srv2100700333=211, srv1187847151=37, srv791064637=345, srv74478935=330, srv1206084762=41, srv1497856295=97, srv897884865=377, srv398014971=261, srv786136704=342, srv1429879791=86, srv1201763981=38, srv1415213844=84, srv302220908=243, srv156683359=105, srv1974497084=192, srv535358845=291, srv627763604=308, srv732106437=326, srv1679724304=130, srv576770232=299, srv478480013=276, srv1237250370=47, srv1169018295=34, srv32320833=248, srv594880186=304, srv216306370=225, srv656484240=315, srv818754908=354, srv1321058011=63, srv1256345927=52, srv1670847243=126, srv1515243164=99, srv1781378955=156, srv508388209=278, srv1910886192=180, srv1718898730=139, srv772274482=337, srv1433624807=87, srv848605385=359, srv2107957639=212, srv270591905=240, srv2126706298=219, srv2080681743=209, srv1683990934=132, srv11526364=28, srv761020484=334, srv1720507603=141, srv266276730=236, srv935213051=386, srv923440665=383, srv1911104834=181, srv1944131651=187, srv1162841146=30, srv1921230216=185, srv319459319=247, srv1168022226=33, srv57689659=300, srv716533901=324, srv1255156178=50, srv441379967=267, srv806979625=350, srv788255577=344, srv976533744=389, srv1317853355=62, srv1491073587=96, srv777865249=339, srv2130226580=221, srv873230355=370, srv971370780=388, srv2008207413=197, srv989150800=390, srv737980208=328, srv862088563=363, srv1716783669=138, srv1801293056=160, srv1363984373=68, srv515711115=282, srv1378945327=75, srv17002515=136, srv853498273=361, srv1825292480=165, srv2124576425=217, srv1889349340=175, srv527691188=286, srv1226737728=44, srv1781498156=157, srv104267960=11, srv1663644309=124, srv1672213768=127, srv740402944=329, srv555807163=294, srv566277037=296, srv734882045=327, srv1143683685=27, srv1021400966=5, srv694407347=319, srv1626790310=113, srv303328507=244, srv1869166689=171, srv781623755=341, srv40741117=264, srv1958265988=190, srv592380483=303, srv483565354=277, srv1531731329=100, srv359746409=253, srv1271131029=54, srv1007512250=2, srv1783696565=158, srv1284150263=57, srv1648846971=118, srv120365207=40, srv263085176=235, srv535080964=290, srv824739010=357, srv744793832=331, srv1073394883=18, srv1113186104=23, srv1370321362=69, srv328204461=249, srv1604342762=109, srv266460489=237, srv313806624=245, srv1473408823=93, srv865692144=366, srv42814401=265, srv104065318=10, srv1599236554=108, srv1476834435=94, srv1673452142=128, srv716892727=325, srv1501773847=98, srv791504502=346, srv367902453=254, srv254349567=232, srv2126102976=218, srv252714068=231, srv916506189=380, srv687320190=318, srv1000433998=0, srv51396503=281, srv648464134=313, srv908419423=379, srv204022732=200, srv1901650254=177, srv200342397=196, srv765841762=335, srv1849125656=167, srv235281774=226, srv2137298641=224, srv517347076=283, srv1687711069=135, srv800105834=347, srv1609917009=112, srv1038797815=9, srv863216619=365, srv921796978=382, srv895924009=376, srv319002955=246, srv611122413=305, srv1942590787=186, srv529333113=288, srv1053973741=14, srv1988512138=194, srv1037112526=8, srv442327402=268, srv2062351281=204, srv1240518778=48, srv471289019=274, srv1857090224=170, srv1543025253=101, srv1915241294=184, srv238420451=228, srv1747796150=145, srv1101668258=21, srv1437034663=88, srv1173449481=35, srv582652595=301, srv1739043021=144, srv1733173130=143, srv465824154=272, srv14463216=91, srv1720161153=140, srv1549403995=102, srv235920151=227, srv1909060246=179, srv527988350=287, srv1801762669=161, srv89501442=375, srv442994824=269, srv1414012241=83, srv165153258=121, srv1766333515=151, srv2063438865=205, srv1071671801=17, srv1638570398=116, srv1035353226=7, srv1856921753=169, srv1887444158=173, srv1897306674=176, srv1255718022=51, srv1260078897=53, srv1372945218=70, srv1163715139=31, srv175471358=146, srv1558656747=104, srv1463869996=92, srv124825865=49, srv1142495625=26, srv1397803774=77, srv1644508836=117, srv1807320536=162, srv1165273546=32, srv1650978005=120, srv1374260725=71, srv2065239646=206, srv1685737274=134, srv878340336=371, srv329463090=250, srv2112675912=213, srv1378293943=74, srv787532288=343, srv1292867420=59, srv519831391=285, srv1002018470=1, srv822141051=356, srv1229740495=45, srv706370370=321, srv255741565=233, srv1177018836=36, srv1223505925=43, srv745532463=332, srv1820836786=163, srv2127145828=220, srv2124524081=216, srv665150476=316, srv2132621880=223, srv2051928856=203, srv1903063797=178, srv881186303=373, srv1758974023=148, srv270549378=239, srv2014789268=198, srv1663469360=123, srv1331983035=65, srv1768940632=153, srv2084732799=210, srv1043044287=12, srv630246195=309, srv86319792=364, srv37305654=256, srv1650394019=119, srv1888093001=174, srv512441512=280, srv813969264=352, srv277288989=241, srv2017714321=199, srv1410469782=81, srv751917673=333, srv1443060804=89, srv1997063872=195, srv404426071=263, srv1443287861=90, srv695697141=320, srv636958174=310, srv1105584096=22, srv583005569=302, srv92523166=384, srv330226906=251, srv1684865692=133, srv381463497=258, srv567942525=297, srv1010403208=3, srv881516937=374, srv140693587=80, srv1872213858=172, srv262210172=234, srv846799674=358, srv851169364=360, srv880017865=372, srv129190288=58, srv401606217=262, srv669535820=317, srv1325384866=64, srv1377673856=73, srv1416276025=85, srv430431276=266, srv81513922=353, srv2044458062=201, srv2118166427=214, srv1665530216=125, srv2045587532=202, srv1824773168=164, srv2071913725=208, srv1295499145=60, srv1780304939=155, srv612277490=306, srv102508625=6, srv1637539828=115, srv820424989=355, srv50966795=279, srv1950402166=188, srv1207208580=42, srv1057648579=16, srv1084295726=20, srv39165764=260, srv959379519=387, srv2066402828=207, srv1556810592=103, srv1232731779=46, srv1606144164=110, srv1487275322=95, srv519310224=284, srv775221203=338, srv1079168923=19, srv1957834842=189, srv866525142=367, srv243907419=229, srv248553307=230, srv344122075=252, srv467461515=273, srv805609280=349, srv1018507425=4, srv1827511993=166, srv1704639485=137, srv855754935=362, srv1057024901=15, srv1116429721=24, srv927375731=385, srv1383836323=76, srv1584407048=107, srv809779157=351, srv1786622589=159, srv869541705=368, srv1123072042=25, srv1726136626=142, srv135800579=67, srv1958676591=191, srv390748718=259, srv907223095=378, srv76871917=336, srv1160170031=29, srv2119727728=215, srv918100507=381, srv1352063642=66, srv1975716907=193} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-17 21:53:14,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-17 21:53:14,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-17 21:53:14,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-17 21:53:14,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-17 21:53:14,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-17 21:53:14,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-17 21:53:14,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-17 21:53:14,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-17 21:53:14,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-17 21:53:14,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-17 21:53:14,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-17 21:53:14,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-17 21:53:14,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-17 21:53:14,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-17 21:53:14,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-17 21:53:14,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-17 21:53:14,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-17 21:53:14,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-17 21:53:14,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-17 21:53:14,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-17 21:53:14,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-17 21:53:14,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-17 21:53:14,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-17 21:53:14,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-17 21:53:14,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-17 21:53:14,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-17 21:53:14,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-17 21:53:14,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-17 21:53:14,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-17 21:53:14,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-17 21:53:14,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-17 21:53:14,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-17 21:53:14,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-17 21:53:14,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-17 21:53:14,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-17 21:53:14,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-17 21:53:14,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-17 21:53:14,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-17 21:53:14,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-17 21:53:14,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-17 21:53:14,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-17 21:53:14,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-17 21:53:14,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-17 21:53:14,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-17 21:53:14,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-17 21:53:14,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-17 21:53:14,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-17 21:53:14,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-17 21:53:14,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-17 21:53:14,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-17 21:53:14,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-17 21:53:14,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-17 21:53:14,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-17 21:53:14,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-17 21:53:14,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-17 21:53:14,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-17 21:53:14,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-17 21:53:14,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-17 21:53:14,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-17 21:53:14,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-17 21:53:14,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-17 21:53:14,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-17 21:53:14,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-17 21:53:14,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-17 21:53:14,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-17 21:53:14,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-17 21:53:14,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-17 21:53:14,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-17 21:53:14,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-17 21:53:14,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-17 21:53:14,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-17 21:53:14,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-17 21:53:14,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-17 21:53:14,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-17 21:53:14,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-17 21:53:14,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-17 21:53:14,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-17 21:53:14,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-17 21:53:14,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-17 21:53:14,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-17 21:53:14,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-17 21:53:14,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-17 21:53:14,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-17 21:53:14,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-17 21:53:14,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-17 21:53:14,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-17 21:53:14,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-17 21:53:14,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-17 21:53:14,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-17 21:53:14,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-17 21:53:14,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-17 21:53:14,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-17 21:53:14,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-17 21:53:14,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-17 21:53:14,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-17 21:53:14,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-17 21:53:14,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-17 21:53:14,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-17 21:53:14,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-17 21:53:14,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-17 21:53:14,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-17 21:53:14,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-17 21:53:14,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-17 21:53:14,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-17 21:53:14,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-17 21:53:14,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-17 21:53:14,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-17 21:53:14,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-17 21:53:14,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-17 21:53:14,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-17 21:53:14,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-17 21:53:14,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-17 21:53:14,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-17 21:53:14,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-17 21:53:14,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-17 21:53:14,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-17 21:53:14,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-17 21:53:14,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-17 21:53:14,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-17 21:53:14,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-17 21:53:14,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-17 21:53:14,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-17 21:53:14,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-17 21:53:14,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-17 21:53:14,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-17 21:53:14,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-17 21:53:14,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-17 21:53:14,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-17 21:53:14,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-17 21:53:14,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-17 21:53:14,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-17 21:53:14,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-17 21:53:14,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-17 21:53:14,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-17 21:53:14,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-17 21:53:14,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-17 21:53:14,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-17 21:53:14,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-17 21:53:14,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-17 21:53:14,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-17 21:53:14,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-17 21:53:14,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-17 21:53:14,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-17 21:53:14,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-17 21:53:14,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-17 21:53:14,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-17 21:53:14,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-17 21:53:14,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-17 21:53:14,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-17 21:53:14,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-17 21:53:14,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-17 21:53:14,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-17 21:53:14,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-17 21:53:14,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-17 21:53:14,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-17 21:53:14,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-17 21:53:14,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-17 21:53:14,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-17 21:53:14,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-17 21:53:14,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-17 21:53:14,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-17 21:53:14,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-17 21:53:14,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-17 21:53:14,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-17 21:53:14,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-17 21:53:14,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-17 21:53:14,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-17 21:53:14,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-17 21:53:14,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-17 21:53:14,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-17 21:53:14,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-17 21:53:14,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-17 21:53:14,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-17 21:53:14,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-17 21:53:14,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-17 21:53:14,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-17 21:53:14,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-17 21:53:14,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-17 21:53:14,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-17 21:53:14,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-17 21:53:14,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-17 21:53:14,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-17 21:53:14,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-17 21:53:14,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-17 21:53:14,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-17 21:53:14,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-17 21:53:14,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-17 21:53:14,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-17 21:53:14,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-17 21:53:14,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-17 21:53:14,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-17 21:53:14,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-17 21:53:14,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-17 21:53:14,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-17 21:53:14,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-17 21:53:14,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-17 21:53:14,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-17 21:53:14,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-17 21:53:14,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-17 21:53:14,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-17 21:53:14,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-17 21:53:14,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-17 21:53:14,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-17 21:53:14,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-17 21:53:14,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-17 21:53:14,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-17 21:53:14,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-17 21:53:14,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-17 21:53:14,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-17 21:53:14,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-17 21:53:14,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-17 21:53:14,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-17 21:53:14,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-17 21:53:14,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-17 21:53:14,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-17 21:53:14,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-17 21:53:14,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-17 21:53:14,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-17 21:53:14,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-17 21:53:14,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-17 21:53:14,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-17 21:53:14,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-17 21:53:14,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-17 21:53:14,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-17 21:53:14,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-17 21:53:14,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-17 21:53:14,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-17 21:53:14,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-17 21:53:14,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-17 21:53:14,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-17 21:53:14,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-17 21:53:14,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-17 21:53:14,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-17 21:53:14,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-17 21:53:14,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-17 21:53:14,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-17 21:53:14,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-17 21:53:14,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-17 21:53:14,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-17 21:53:14,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-17 21:53:14,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-17 21:53:14,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-17 21:53:14,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-17 21:53:14,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-17 21:53:14,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-17 21:53:14,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-17 21:53:14,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-17 21:53:14,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-17 21:53:14,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-17 21:53:14,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-17 21:53:14,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-17 21:53:14,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-17 21:53:14,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-17 21:53:14,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-17 21:53:14,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-17 21:53:14,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-17 21:53:14,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-17 21:53:14,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-17 21:53:14,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-17 21:53:14,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-17 21:53:14,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-17 21:53:14,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-17 21:53:14,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-17 21:53:14,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-17 21:53:14,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-17 21:53:14,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-17 21:53:14,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-17 21:53:14,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-17 21:53:14,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-17 21:53:14,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-17 21:53:14,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-17 21:53:14,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-17 21:53:14,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-17 21:53:14,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-17 21:53:14,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-17 21:53:14,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-17 21:53:14,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-17 21:53:14,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-17 21:53:14,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-17 21:53:14,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-17 21:53:14,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-17 21:53:14,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-17 21:53:14,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-17 21:53:14,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-17 21:53:14,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-17 21:53:14,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-17 21:53:14,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-17 21:53:14,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-17 21:53:14,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-17 21:53:14,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-17 21:53:14,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-17 21:53:14,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-17 21:53:14,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-17 21:53:14,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-17 21:53:14,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-17 21:53:14,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-17 21:53:14,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-17 21:53:14,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-17 21:53:14,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-17 21:53:14,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-17 21:53:14,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-17 21:53:14,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-17 21:53:14,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-17 21:53:14,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-17 21:53:14,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-17 21:53:14,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-17 21:53:14,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-17 21:53:14,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-17 21:53:14,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-17 21:53:14,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-17 21:53:14,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-17 21:53:14,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-17 21:53:14,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-17 21:53:14,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-17 21:53:14,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-17 21:53:14,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-17 21:53:14,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-17 21:53:14,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-17 21:53:14,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-17 21:53:14,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-17 21:53:14,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-17 21:53:14,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-17 21:53:14,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-17 21:53:14,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-17 21:53:14,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-17 21:53:14,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-17 21:53:14,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-17 21:53:14,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-17 21:53:14,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-17 21:53:14,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-17 21:53:14,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-17 21:53:14,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-17 21:53:14,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-17 21:53:14,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-17 21:53:14,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-17 21:53:14,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-17 21:53:14,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-17 21:53:14,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-17 21:53:14,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-17 21:53:14,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-17 21:53:14,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-17 21:53:14,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-17 21:53:14,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-17 21:53:14,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-17 21:53:14,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-17 21:53:14,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-17 21:53:14,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-17 21:53:14,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-17 21:53:14,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-17 21:53:14,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-17 21:53:14,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-17 21:53:14,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-17 21:53:14,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-17 21:53:14,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-17 21:53:14,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-17 21:53:14,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-17 21:53:14,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-17 21:53:14,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-17 21:53:14,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-17 21:53:14,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-17 21:53:14,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-17 21:53:14,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-17 21:53:14,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-17 21:53:14,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-17 21:53:14,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-17 21:53:14,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-17 21:53:14,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-17 21:53:14,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-17 21:53:14,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-17 21:53:14,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-17 21:53:14,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-17 21:53:14,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-17 21:53:14,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-17 21:53:14,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-17 21:53:14,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-17 21:53:14,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-17 21:53:14,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-17 21:53:14,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-17 21:53:14,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-17 21:53:14,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-17 21:53:14,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-17 21:53:14,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-17 21:53:14,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,815 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table12) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,815 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table46
2023-07-17 21:53:14,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv871358531=369, srv64697211=312, srv653261481=314, srv1778141916=154, srv716510755=323, srv372169288=255, srv568235512=298, srv710229516=322, srv537137712=293, srv1682791519=131, srv642353994=311, srv1046656068=13, srv993792848=391, srv1202667070=39, srv99567927=392, srv1607947050=111, srv1677371877=129, srv1763526149=150, srv1763378353=149, srv531263272=289, srv448398842=270, srv802808934=348, srv77960001=340, srv453521623=271, srv162773041=114, srv563606057=295, srv1659238910=122, srv1279307656=55, srv1914255334=183, srv1296605582=61, srv2131597846=222, srv1375359355=72, srv1405269336=79, srv175680261=147, srv282211488=242, srv1412891098=82, srv375712549=257, srv191234370=182, srv1574132168=106, srv1853511149=168, srv617306884=307, srv268601623=238, srv1400099806=78, srv477381292=275, srv1279442050=56, srv535853198=292, srv1767480590=152, srv2100700333=211, srv1187847151=37, srv791064637=345, srv74478935=330, srv1206084762=41, srv1497856295=97, srv897884865=377, srv398014971=261, srv786136704=342, srv1429879791=86, srv1201763981=38, srv1415213844=84, srv302220908=243, srv156683359=105, srv1974497084=192, srv535358845=291, srv627763604=308, srv732106437=326, srv1679724304=130, srv576770232=299, srv478480013=276, srv1237250370=47, srv1169018295=34, srv32320833=248, srv594880186=304, srv216306370=225, srv656484240=315, srv818754908=354, srv1321058011=63, srv1256345927=52, srv1670847243=126, srv1515243164=99, srv1781378955=156, srv508388209=278, srv1910886192=180, srv1718898730=139, srv772274482=337, srv1433624807=87, srv848605385=359, srv2107957639=212, srv270591905=240, srv2126706298=219, srv2080681743=209, srv1683990934=132, srv11526364=28, srv761020484=334, srv1720507603=141, srv266276730=236, srv935213051=386, srv923440665=383, srv1911104834=181, srv1944131651=187, srv1162841146=30, srv1921230216=185, srv319459319=247, srv1168022226=33, srv57689659=300, srv716533901=324, srv1255156178=50, srv441379967=267, srv806979625=350, srv788255577=344, srv976533744=389, srv1317853355=62, srv1491073587=96, srv777865249=339, srv2130226580=221, srv873230355=370, srv971370780=388, srv2008207413=197, srv989150800=390, srv737980208=328, srv862088563=363, srv1716783669=138, srv1801293056=160, srv1363984373=68, srv515711115=282, srv1378945327=75, srv17002515=136, srv853498273=361, srv1825292480=165, srv2124576425=217, srv1889349340=175, srv527691188=286, srv1226737728=44, srv1781498156=157, srv104267960=11, srv1663644309=124, srv1672213768=127, srv740402944=329, srv555807163=294, srv566277037=296, srv734882045=327, srv1143683685=27, srv1021400966=5, srv694407347=319, srv1626790310=113, srv303328507=244, srv1869166689=171, srv781623755=341, srv40741117=264, srv1958265988=190, srv592380483=303, srv483565354=277, srv1531731329=100, srv359746409=253, srv1271131029=54, srv1007512250=2, srv1783696565=158, srv1284150263=57, srv1648846971=118, srv120365207=40, srv263085176=235, srv535080964=290, srv824739010=357, srv744793832=331, srv1073394883=18, srv1113186104=23, srv1370321362=69, srv328204461=249, srv1604342762=109, srv266460489=237, srv313806624=245, srv1473408823=93, srv865692144=366, srv42814401=265, srv104065318=10, srv1599236554=108, srv1476834435=94, srv1673452142=128, srv716892727=325, srv1501773847=98, srv791504502=346, srv367902453=254, srv254349567=232, srv2126102976=218, srv252714068=231, srv916506189=380, srv687320190=318, srv1000433998=0, srv51396503=281, srv648464134=313, srv908419423=379, srv204022732=200, srv1901650254=177, srv200342397=196, srv765841762=335, srv1849125656=167, srv235281774=226, srv2137298641=224, srv517347076=283, srv1687711069=135, srv800105834=347, srv1609917009=112, srv1038797815=9, srv863216619=365, srv921796978=382, srv895924009=376, srv319002955=246, srv611122413=305, srv1942590787=186, srv529333113=288, srv1053973741=14, srv1988512138=194, srv1037112526=8, srv442327402=268, srv2062351281=204, srv1240518778=48, srv471289019=274, srv1857090224=170, srv1543025253=101, srv1915241294=184, srv238420451=228, srv1747796150=145, srv1101668258=21, srv1437034663=88, srv1173449481=35, srv582652595=301, srv1739043021=144, srv1733173130=143, srv465824154=272, srv14463216=91, srv1720161153=140, srv1549403995=102, srv235920151=227, srv1909060246=179, srv527988350=287, srv1801762669=161, srv89501442=375, srv442994824=269, srv1414012241=83, srv165153258=121, srv1766333515=151, srv2063438865=205, srv1071671801=17, srv1638570398=116, srv1035353226=7, srv1856921753=169, srv1887444158=173, srv1897306674=176, srv1255718022=51, srv1260078897=53, srv1372945218=70, srv1163715139=31, srv175471358=146, srv1558656747=104, srv1463869996=92, srv124825865=49, srv1142495625=26, srv1397803774=77, srv1644508836=117, srv1807320536=162, srv1165273546=32, srv1650978005=120, srv1374260725=71, srv2065239646=206, srv1685737274=134, srv878340336=371, srv329463090=250, srv2112675912=213, srv1378293943=74, srv787532288=343, srv1292867420=59, srv519831391=285, srv1002018470=1, srv822141051=356, srv1229740495=45, srv706370370=321, srv255741565=233, srv1177018836=36, srv1223505925=43, srv745532463=332, srv1820836786=163, srv2127145828=220, srv2124524081=216, srv665150476=316, srv2132621880=223, srv2051928856=203, srv1903063797=178, srv881186303=373, srv1758974023=148, srv270549378=239, srv2014789268=198, srv1663469360=123, srv1331983035=65, srv1768940632=153, srv2084732799=210, srv1043044287=12, srv630246195=309, srv86319792=364, srv37305654=256, srv1650394019=119, srv1888093001=174, srv512441512=280, srv813969264=352, srv277288989=241, srv2017714321=199, srv1410469782=81, srv751917673=333, srv1443060804=89, srv1997063872=195, srv404426071=263, srv1443287861=90, srv695697141=320, srv636958174=310, srv1105584096=22, srv583005569=302, srv92523166=384, srv330226906=251, srv1684865692=133, srv381463497=258, srv567942525=297, srv1010403208=3, srv881516937=374, srv140693587=80, srv1872213858=172, srv262210172=234, srv846799674=358, srv851169364=360, srv880017865=372, srv129190288=58, srv401606217=262, srv669535820=317, srv1325384866=64, srv1377673856=73, srv1416276025=85, srv430431276=266, srv81513922=353, srv2044458062=201, srv2118166427=214, srv1665530216=125, srv2045587532=202, srv1824773168=164, srv2071913725=208, srv1295499145=60, srv1780304939=155, srv612277490=306, srv102508625=6, srv1637539828=115, srv820424989=355, srv50966795=279, srv1950402166=188, srv1207208580=42, srv1057648579=16, srv1084295726=20, srv39165764=260, srv959379519=387, srv2066402828=207, srv1556810592=103, srv1232731779=46, srv1606144164=110, srv1487275322=95, srv519310224=284, srv775221203=338, srv1079168923=19, srv1957834842=189, srv866525142=367, srv243907419=229, srv248553307=230, srv344122075=252, srv467461515=273, srv805609280=349, srv1018507425=4, srv1827511993=166, srv1704639485=137, srv855754935=362, srv1057024901=15, srv1116429721=24, srv927375731=385, srv1383836323=76, srv1584407048=107, srv809779157=351, srv1786622589=159, srv869541705=368, srv1123072042=25, srv1726136626=142, srv135800579=67, srv1958676591=191, srv390748718=259, srv907223095=378, srv76871917=336, srv1160170031=29, srv2119727728=215, srv918100507=381, srv1352063642=66, srv1975716907=193} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-17 21:53:14,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-17 21:53:14,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-17 21:53:14,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-17 21:53:14,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-17 21:53:14,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-17 21:53:14,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-17 21:53:14,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-17 21:53:14,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-17 21:53:14,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-17 21:53:14,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-17 21:53:14,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-17 21:53:14,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-17 21:53:14,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-17 21:53:14,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-17 21:53:14,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-17 21:53:14,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-17 21:53:14,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-17 21:53:14,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-17 21:53:14,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-17 21:53:14,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-17 21:53:14,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-17 21:53:14,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-17 21:53:14,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-17 21:53:14,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-17 21:53:14,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-17 21:53:14,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-17 21:53:14,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-17 21:53:14,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-17 21:53:14,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-17 21:53:14,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-17 21:53:14,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-17 21:53:14,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-17 21:53:14,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-17 21:53:14,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-17 21:53:14,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-17 21:53:14,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-17 21:53:14,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-17 21:53:14,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-17 21:53:14,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-17 21:53:14,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-17 21:53:14,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-17 21:53:14,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-17 21:53:14,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-17 21:53:14,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-17 21:53:14,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-17 21:53:14,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-17 21:53:14,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-17 21:53:14,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-17 21:53:14,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-17 21:53:14,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-17 21:53:14,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-17 21:53:14,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-17 21:53:14,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-17 21:53:14,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-17 21:53:14,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-17 21:53:14,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-17 21:53:14,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-17 21:53:14,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-17 21:53:14,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-17 21:53:14,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-17 21:53:14,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-17 21:53:14,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-17 21:53:14,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-17 21:53:14,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-17 21:53:14,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-17 21:53:14,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-17 21:53:14,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-17 21:53:14,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-17 21:53:14,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-17 21:53:14,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-17 21:53:14,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-17 21:53:14,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-17 21:53:14,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-17 21:53:14,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-17 21:53:14,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-17 21:53:14,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-17 21:53:14,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-17 21:53:14,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-17 21:53:14,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-17 21:53:14,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-17 21:53:14,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-17 21:53:14,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-17 21:53:14,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-17 21:53:14,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-17 21:53:14,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-17 21:53:14,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-17 21:53:14,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-17 21:53:14,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-17 21:53:14,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-17 21:53:14,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-17 21:53:14,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-17 21:53:14,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-17 21:53:14,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-17 21:53:14,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-17 21:53:14,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-17 21:53:14,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-17 21:53:14,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-17 21:53:14,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-17 21:53:14,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-17 21:53:14,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-17 21:53:14,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-17 21:53:14,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-17 21:53:14,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-17 21:53:14,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-17 21:53:14,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-17 21:53:14,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-17 21:53:14,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-17 21:53:14,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-17 21:53:14,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-17 21:53:14,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-17 21:53:14,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-17 21:53:14,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-17 21:53:14,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-17 21:53:14,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-17 21:53:14,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-17 21:53:14,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-17 21:53:14,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-17 21:53:14,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-17 21:53:14,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-17 21:53:14,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-17 21:53:14,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-17 21:53:14,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-17 21:53:14,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-17 21:53:14,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-17 21:53:14,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-17 21:53:14,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-17 21:53:14,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-17 21:53:14,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-17 21:53:14,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-17 21:53:14,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-17 21:53:14,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-17 21:53:14,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-17 21:53:14,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-17 21:53:14,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-17 21:53:14,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-17 21:53:14,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-17 21:53:14,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-17 21:53:14,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-17 21:53:14,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-17 21:53:14,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-17 21:53:14,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-17 21:53:14,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-17 21:53:14,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-17 21:53:14,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-17 21:53:14,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-17 21:53:14,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-17 21:53:14,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-17 21:53:14,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-17 21:53:14,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-17 21:53:14,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-17 21:53:14,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-17 21:53:14,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-17 21:53:14,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-17 21:53:14,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-17 21:53:14,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-17 21:53:14,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-17 21:53:14,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-17 21:53:14,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-17 21:53:14,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-17 21:53:14,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-17 21:53:14,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-17 21:53:14,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-17 21:53:14,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-17 21:53:14,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-17 21:53:14,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-17 21:53:14,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-17 21:53:14,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-17 21:53:14,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-17 21:53:14,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-17 21:53:14,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-17 21:53:14,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-17 21:53:14,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-17 21:53:14,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-17 21:53:14,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-17 21:53:14,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-17 21:53:14,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-17 21:53:14,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-17 21:53:14,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-17 21:53:14,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-17 21:53:14,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-17 21:53:14,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-17 21:53:14,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-17 21:53:14,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-17 21:53:14,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-17 21:53:14,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-17 21:53:14,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-17 21:53:14,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-17 21:53:14,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-17 21:53:14,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-17 21:53:14,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-17 21:53:14,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-17 21:53:14,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-17 21:53:14,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-17 21:53:14,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-17 21:53:14,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-17 21:53:14,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-17 21:53:14,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-17 21:53:14,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-17 21:53:14,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-17 21:53:14,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-17 21:53:14,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-17 21:53:14,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-17 21:53:14,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-17 21:53:14,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-17 21:53:14,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-17 21:53:14,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-17 21:53:14,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-17 21:53:14,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-17 21:53:14,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-17 21:53:14,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-17 21:53:14,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-17 21:53:14,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-17 21:53:14,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-17 21:53:14,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-17 21:53:14,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-17 21:53:14,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-17 21:53:14,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-17 21:53:14,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-17 21:53:14,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-17 21:53:14,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-17 21:53:14,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-17 21:53:14,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-17 21:53:14,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-17 21:53:14,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-17 21:53:14,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-17 21:53:14,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-17 21:53:14,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-17 21:53:14,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-17 21:53:14,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-17 21:53:14,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-17 21:53:14,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-17 21:53:14,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-17 21:53:14,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-17 21:53:14,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-17 21:53:14,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-17 21:53:14,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-17 21:53:14,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-17 21:53:14,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-17 21:53:14,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-17 21:53:14,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-17 21:53:14,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-17 21:53:14,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-17 21:53:14,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-17 21:53:14,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-17 21:53:14,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-17 21:53:14,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-17 21:53:14,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-17 21:53:14,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-17 21:53:14,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-17 21:53:14,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-17 21:53:14,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-17 21:53:14,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-17 21:53:14,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-17 21:53:14,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-17 21:53:14,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-17 21:53:14,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-17 21:53:14,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-17 21:53:14,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-17 21:53:14,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-17 21:53:14,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-17 21:53:14,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-17 21:53:14,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-17 21:53:14,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-17 21:53:14,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-17 21:53:14,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-17 21:53:14,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-17 21:53:14,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-17 21:53:14,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-17 21:53:14,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-17 21:53:14,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-17 21:53:14,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-17 21:53:14,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-17 21:53:14,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-17 21:53:14,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-17 21:53:14,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-17 21:53:14,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-17 21:53:14,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-17 21:53:14,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-17 21:53:14,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-17 21:53:14,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-17 21:53:14,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-17 21:53:14,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-17 21:53:14,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-17 21:53:14,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-17 21:53:14,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-17 21:53:14,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-17 21:53:14,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-17 21:53:14,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-17 21:53:14,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-17 21:53:14,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-17 21:53:14,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-17 21:53:14,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-17 21:53:14,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-17 21:53:14,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-17 21:53:14,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-17 21:53:14,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-17 21:53:14,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-17 21:53:14,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-17 21:53:14,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-17 21:53:14,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-17 21:53:14,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-17 21:53:14,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-17 21:53:14,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-17 21:53:14,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-17 21:53:14,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-17 21:53:14,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-17 21:53:14,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-17 21:53:14,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-17 21:53:14,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-17 21:53:14,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-17 21:53:14,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-17 21:53:14,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-17 21:53:14,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-17 21:53:14,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-17 21:53:14,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-17 21:53:14,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-17 21:53:14,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-17 21:53:14,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-17 21:53:14,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-17 21:53:14,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-17 21:53:14,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-17 21:53:14,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-17 21:53:14,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-17 21:53:14,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-17 21:53:14,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-17 21:53:14,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-17 21:53:14,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-17 21:53:14,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-17 21:53:14,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-17 21:53:14,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-17 21:53:14,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-17 21:53:14,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-17 21:53:14,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-17 21:53:14,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-17 21:53:14,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-17 21:53:14,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-17 21:53:14,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-17 21:53:14,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-17 21:53:14,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-17 21:53:14,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-17 21:53:14,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-17 21:53:14,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-17 21:53:14,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-17 21:53:14,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-17 21:53:14,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-17 21:53:14,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-17 21:53:14,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-17 21:53:14,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-17 21:53:14,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-17 21:53:14,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-17 21:53:14,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-17 21:53:14,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-17 21:53:14,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-17 21:53:14,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-17 21:53:14,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-17 21:53:14,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-17 21:53:14,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-17 21:53:14,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-17 21:53:14,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-17 21:53:14,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-17 21:53:14,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-17 21:53:14,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-17 21:53:14,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-17 21:53:14,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-17 21:53:14,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-17 21:53:14,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-17 21:53:14,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-17 21:53:14,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-17 21:53:14,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-17 21:53:14,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-17 21:53:14,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-17 21:53:14,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-17 21:53:14,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-17 21:53:14,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-17 21:53:14,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-17 21:53:14,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-17 21:53:14,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-17 21:53:14,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-17 21:53:14,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-17 21:53:14,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-17 21:53:14,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-17 21:53:14,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-17 21:53:14,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,830 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table46) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,830 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table47
2023-07-17 21:53:14,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv871358531=369, srv64697211=312, srv653261481=314, srv1778141916=154, srv716510755=323, srv372169288=255, srv568235512=298, srv710229516=322, srv537137712=293, srv1682791519=131, srv642353994=311, srv1046656068=13, srv993792848=391, srv1202667070=39, srv99567927=392, srv1607947050=111, srv1677371877=129, srv1763526149=150, srv1763378353=149, srv531263272=289, srv448398842=270, srv802808934=348, srv77960001=340, srv453521623=271, srv162773041=114, srv563606057=295, srv1659238910=122, srv1279307656=55, srv1914255334=183, srv1296605582=61, srv2131597846=222, srv1375359355=72, srv1405269336=79, srv175680261=147, srv282211488=242, srv1412891098=82, srv375712549=257, srv191234370=182, srv1574132168=106, srv1853511149=168, srv617306884=307, srv268601623=238, srv1400099806=78, srv477381292=275, srv1279442050=56, srv535853198=292, srv1767480590=152, srv2100700333=211, srv1187847151=37, srv791064637=345, srv74478935=330, srv1206084762=41, srv1497856295=97, srv897884865=377, srv398014971=261, srv786136704=342, srv1429879791=86, srv1201763981=38, srv1415213844=84, srv302220908=243, srv156683359=105, srv1974497084=192, srv535358845=291, srv627763604=308, srv732106437=326, srv1679724304=130, srv576770232=299, srv478480013=276, srv1237250370=47, srv1169018295=34, srv32320833=248, srv594880186=304, srv216306370=225, srv656484240=315, srv818754908=354, srv1321058011=63, srv1256345927=52, srv1670847243=126, srv1515243164=99, srv1781378955=156, srv508388209=278, srv1910886192=180, srv1718898730=139, srv772274482=337, srv1433624807=87, srv848605385=359, srv2107957639=212, srv270591905=240, srv2126706298=219, srv2080681743=209, srv1683990934=132, srv11526364=28, srv761020484=334, srv1720507603=141, srv266276730=236, srv935213051=386, srv923440665=383, srv1911104834=181, srv1944131651=187, srv1162841146=30, srv1921230216=185, srv319459319=247, srv1168022226=33, srv57689659=300, srv716533901=324, srv1255156178=50, srv441379967=267, srv806979625=350, srv788255577=344, srv976533744=389, srv1317853355=62, srv1491073587=96, srv777865249=339, srv2130226580=221, srv873230355=370, srv971370780=388, srv2008207413=197, srv989150800=390, srv737980208=328, srv862088563=363, srv1716783669=138, srv1801293056=160, srv1363984373=68, srv515711115=282, srv1378945327=75, srv17002515=136, srv853498273=361, srv1825292480=165, srv2124576425=217, srv1889349340=175, srv527691188=286, srv1226737728=44, srv1781498156=157, srv104267960=11, srv1663644309=124, srv1672213768=127, srv740402944=329, srv555807163=294, srv566277037=296, srv734882045=327, srv1143683685=27, srv1021400966=5, srv694407347=319, srv1626790310=113, srv303328507=244, srv1869166689=171, srv781623755=341, srv40741117=264, srv1958265988=190, srv592380483=303, srv483565354=277, srv1531731329=100, srv359746409=253, srv1271131029=54, srv1007512250=2, srv1783696565=158, srv1284150263=57, srv1648846971=118, srv120365207=40, srv263085176=235, srv535080964=290, srv824739010=357, srv744793832=331, srv1073394883=18, srv1113186104=23, srv1370321362=69, srv328204461=249, srv1604342762=109, srv266460489=237, srv313806624=245, srv1473408823=93, srv865692144=366, srv42814401=265, srv104065318=10, srv1599236554=108, srv1476834435=94, srv1673452142=128, srv716892727=325, srv1501773847=98, srv791504502=346, srv367902453=254, srv254349567=232, srv2126102976=218, srv252714068=231, srv916506189=380, srv687320190=318, srv1000433998=0, srv51396503=281, srv648464134=313, srv908419423=379, srv204022732=200, srv1901650254=177, srv200342397=196, srv765841762=335, srv1849125656=167, srv235281774=226, srv2137298641=224, srv517347076=283, srv1687711069=135, srv800105834=347, srv1609917009=112, srv1038797815=9, srv863216619=365, srv921796978=382, srv895924009=376, srv319002955=246, srv611122413=305, srv1942590787=186, srv529333113=288, srv1053973741=14, srv1988512138=194, srv1037112526=8, srv442327402=268, srv2062351281=204, srv1240518778=48, srv471289019=274, srv1857090224=170, srv1543025253=101, srv1915241294=184, srv238420451=228, srv1747796150=145, srv1101668258=21, srv1437034663=88, srv1173449481=35, srv582652595=301, srv1739043021=144, srv1733173130=143, srv465824154=272, srv14463216=91, srv1720161153=140, srv1549403995=102, srv235920151=227, srv1909060246=179, srv527988350=287, srv1801762669=161, srv89501442=375, srv442994824=269, srv1414012241=83, srv165153258=121, srv1766333515=151, srv2063438865=205, srv1071671801=17, srv1638570398=116, srv1035353226=7, srv1856921753=169, srv1887444158=173, srv1897306674=176, srv1255718022=51, srv1260078897=53, srv1372945218=70, srv1163715139=31, srv175471358=146, srv1558656747=104, srv1463869996=92, srv124825865=49, srv1142495625=26, srv1397803774=77, srv1644508836=117, srv1807320536=162, srv1165273546=32, srv1650978005=120, srv1374260725=71, srv2065239646=206, srv1685737274=134, srv878340336=371, srv329463090=250, srv2112675912=213, srv1378293943=74, srv787532288=343, srv1292867420=59, srv519831391=285, srv1002018470=1, srv822141051=356, srv1229740495=45, srv706370370=321, srv255741565=233, srv1177018836=36, srv1223505925=43, srv745532463=332, srv1820836786=163, srv2127145828=220, srv2124524081=216, srv665150476=316, srv2132621880=223, srv2051928856=203, srv1903063797=178, srv881186303=373, srv1758974023=148, srv270549378=239, srv2014789268=198, srv1663469360=123, srv1331983035=65, srv1768940632=153, srv2084732799=210, srv1043044287=12, srv630246195=309, srv86319792=364, srv37305654=256, srv1650394019=119, srv1888093001=174, srv512441512=280, srv813969264=352, srv277288989=241, srv2017714321=199, srv1410469782=81, srv751917673=333, srv1443060804=89, srv1997063872=195, srv404426071=263, srv1443287861=90, srv695697141=320, srv636958174=310, srv1105584096=22, srv583005569=302, srv92523166=384, srv330226906=251, srv1684865692=133, srv381463497=258, srv567942525=297, srv1010403208=3, srv881516937=374, srv140693587=80, srv1872213858=172, srv262210172=234, srv846799674=358, srv851169364=360, srv880017865=372, srv129190288=58, srv401606217=262, srv669535820=317, srv1325384866=64, srv1377673856=73, srv1416276025=85, srv430431276=266, srv81513922=353, srv2044458062=201, srv2118166427=214, srv1665530216=125, srv2045587532=202, srv1824773168=164, srv2071913725=208, srv1295499145=60, srv1780304939=155, srv612277490=306, srv102508625=6, srv1637539828=115, srv820424989=355, srv50966795=279, srv1950402166=188, srv1207208580=42, srv1057648579=16, srv1084295726=20, srv39165764=260, srv959379519=387, srv2066402828=207, srv1556810592=103, srv1232731779=46, srv1606144164=110, srv1487275322=95, srv519310224=284, srv775221203=338, srv1079168923=19, srv1957834842=189, srv866525142=367, srv243907419=229, srv248553307=230, srv344122075=252, srv467461515=273, srv805609280=349, srv1018507425=4, srv1827511993=166, srv1704639485=137, srv855754935=362, srv1057024901=15, srv1116429721=24, srv927375731=385, srv1383836323=76, srv1584407048=107, srv809779157=351, srv1786622589=159, srv869541705=368, srv1123072042=25, srv1726136626=142, srv135800579=67, srv1958676591=191, srv390748718=259, srv907223095=378, srv76871917=336, srv1160170031=29, srv2119727728=215, srv918100507=381, srv1352063642=66, srv1975716907=193} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-17 21:53:14,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-17 21:53:14,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-17 21:53:14,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-17 21:53:14,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-17 21:53:14,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-17 21:53:14,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-17 21:53:14,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-17 21:53:14,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-17 21:53:14,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-17 21:53:14,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-17 21:53:14,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-17 21:53:14,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-17 21:53:14,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-17 21:53:14,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-17 21:53:14,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-17 21:53:14,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-17 21:53:14,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-17 21:53:14,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-17 21:53:14,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-17 21:53:14,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-17 21:53:14,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-17 21:53:14,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-17 21:53:14,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-17 21:53:14,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-17 21:53:14,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-17 21:53:14,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-17 21:53:14,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-17 21:53:14,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-17 21:53:14,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-17 21:53:14,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-17 21:53:14,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-17 21:53:14,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-17 21:53:14,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-17 21:53:14,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-17 21:53:14,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-17 21:53:14,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-17 21:53:14,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-17 21:53:14,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-17 21:53:14,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-17 21:53:14,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-17 21:53:14,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-17 21:53:14,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-17 21:53:14,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-17 21:53:14,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-17 21:53:14,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-17 21:53:14,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-17 21:53:14,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-17 21:53:14,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-17 21:53:14,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-17 21:53:14,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-17 21:53:14,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-17 21:53:14,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-17 21:53:14,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-17 21:53:14,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-17 21:53:14,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-17 21:53:14,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-17 21:53:14,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-17 21:53:14,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-17 21:53:14,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-17 21:53:14,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-17 21:53:14,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-17 21:53:14,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-17 21:53:14,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-17 21:53:14,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-17 21:53:14,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-17 21:53:14,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-17 21:53:14,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-17 21:53:14,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-17 21:53:14,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-17 21:53:14,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-17 21:53:14,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-17 21:53:14,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-17 21:53:14,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-17 21:53:14,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-17 21:53:14,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-17 21:53:14,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-17 21:53:14,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-17 21:53:14,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-17 21:53:14,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-17 21:53:14,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-17 21:53:14,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-17 21:53:14,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-17 21:53:14,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-17 21:53:14,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-17 21:53:14,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-17 21:53:14,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-17 21:53:14,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-17 21:53:14,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-17 21:53:14,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-17 21:53:14,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-17 21:53:14,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-17 21:53:14,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-17 21:53:14,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-17 21:53:14,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-17 21:53:14,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-17 21:53:14,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-17 21:53:14,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-17 21:53:14,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-17 21:53:14,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-17 21:53:14,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-17 21:53:14,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-17 21:53:14,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-17 21:53:14,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-17 21:53:14,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-17 21:53:14,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-17 21:53:14,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-17 21:53:14,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-17 21:53:14,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-17 21:53:14,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-17 21:53:14,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-17 21:53:14,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-17 21:53:14,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-17 21:53:14,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-17 21:53:14,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-17 21:53:14,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-17 21:53:14,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-17 21:53:14,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-17 21:53:14,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-17 21:53:14,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-17 21:53:14,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-17 21:53:14,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-17 21:53:14,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-17 21:53:14,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-17 21:53:14,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-17 21:53:14,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-17 21:53:14,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-17 21:53:14,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-17 21:53:14,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-17 21:53:14,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-17 21:53:14,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-17 21:53:14,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-17 21:53:14,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-17 21:53:14,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-17 21:53:14,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-17 21:53:14,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-17 21:53:14,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-17 21:53:14,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-17 21:53:14,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-17 21:53:14,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-17 21:53:14,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-17 21:53:14,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-17 21:53:14,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-17 21:53:14,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-17 21:53:14,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-17 21:53:14,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-17 21:53:14,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-17 21:53:14,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-17 21:53:14,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-17 21:53:14,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-17 21:53:14,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-17 21:53:14,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-17 21:53:14,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-17 21:53:14,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-17 21:53:14,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-17 21:53:14,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-17 21:53:14,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-17 21:53:14,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-17 21:53:14,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-17 21:53:14,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-17 21:53:14,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-17 21:53:14,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-17 21:53:14,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-17 21:53:14,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-17 21:53:14,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-17 21:53:14,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-17 21:53:14,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-17 21:53:14,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-17 21:53:14,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-17 21:53:14,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-17 21:53:14,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-17 21:53:14,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-17 21:53:14,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-17 21:53:14,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-17 21:53:14,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-17 21:53:14,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-17 21:53:14,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-17 21:53:14,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-17 21:53:14,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-17 21:53:14,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-17 21:53:14,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-17 21:53:14,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-17 21:53:14,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-17 21:53:14,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-17 21:53:14,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-17 21:53:14,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-17 21:53:14,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-17 21:53:14,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-17 21:53:14,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-17 21:53:14,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-17 21:53:14,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-17 21:53:14,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-17 21:53:14,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-17 21:53:14,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-17 21:53:14,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-17 21:53:14,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-17 21:53:14,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-17 21:53:14,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-17 21:53:14,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-17 21:53:14,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-17 21:53:14,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-17 21:53:14,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-17 21:53:14,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-17 21:53:14,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-17 21:53:14,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-17 21:53:14,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-17 21:53:14,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-17 21:53:14,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-17 21:53:14,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-17 21:53:14,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-17 21:53:14,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-17 21:53:14,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-17 21:53:14,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-17 21:53:14,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-17 21:53:14,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-17 21:53:14,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-17 21:53:14,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-17 21:53:14,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-17 21:53:14,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-17 21:53:14,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-17 21:53:14,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-17 21:53:14,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-17 21:53:14,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-17 21:53:14,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-17 21:53:14,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-17 21:53:14,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-17 21:53:14,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-17 21:53:14,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-17 21:53:14,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-17 21:53:14,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-17 21:53:14,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-17 21:53:14,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-17 21:53:14,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-17 21:53:14,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-17 21:53:14,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-17 21:53:14,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-17 21:53:14,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-17 21:53:14,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-17 21:53:14,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-17 21:53:14,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-17 21:53:14,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-17 21:53:14,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-17 21:53:14,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-17 21:53:14,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-17 21:53:14,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-17 21:53:14,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-17 21:53:14,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-17 21:53:14,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-17 21:53:14,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-17 21:53:14,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-17 21:53:14,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-17 21:53:14,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-17 21:53:14,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-17 21:53:14,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-17 21:53:14,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-17 21:53:14,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-17 21:53:14,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-17 21:53:14,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-17 21:53:14,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-17 21:53:14,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-17 21:53:14,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-17 21:53:14,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-17 21:53:14,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-17 21:53:14,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-17 21:53:14,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-17 21:53:14,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-17 21:53:14,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-17 21:53:14,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-17 21:53:14,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-17 21:53:14,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-17 21:53:14,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-17 21:53:14,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-17 21:53:14,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-17 21:53:14,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-17 21:53:14,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-17 21:53:14,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-17 21:53:14,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-17 21:53:14,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-17 21:53:14,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-17 21:53:14,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-17 21:53:14,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-17 21:53:14,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-17 21:53:14,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-17 21:53:14,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-17 21:53:14,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-17 21:53:14,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-17 21:53:14,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-17 21:53:14,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-17 21:53:14,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-17 21:53:14,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-17 21:53:14,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-17 21:53:14,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-17 21:53:14,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-17 21:53:14,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-17 21:53:14,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-17 21:53:14,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-17 21:53:14,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-17 21:53:14,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-17 21:53:14,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-17 21:53:14,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-17 21:53:14,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-17 21:53:14,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-17 21:53:14,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-17 21:53:14,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-17 21:53:14,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-17 21:53:14,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-17 21:53:14,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-17 21:53:14,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-17 21:53:14,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-17 21:53:14,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-17 21:53:14,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-17 21:53:14,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-17 21:53:14,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-17 21:53:14,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-17 21:53:14,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-17 21:53:14,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-17 21:53:14,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-17 21:53:14,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-17 21:53:14,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-17 21:53:14,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-17 21:53:14,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-17 21:53:14,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-17 21:53:14,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-17 21:53:14,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-17 21:53:14,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-17 21:53:14,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-17 21:53:14,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-17 21:53:14,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-17 21:53:14,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-17 21:53:14,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-17 21:53:14,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-17 21:53:14,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-17 21:53:14,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-17 21:53:14,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-17 21:53:14,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-17 21:53:14,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-17 21:53:14,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-17 21:53:14,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-17 21:53:14,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-17 21:53:14,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-17 21:53:14,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-17 21:53:14,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-17 21:53:14,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-17 21:53:14,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-17 21:53:14,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-17 21:53:14,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-17 21:53:14,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-17 21:53:14,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-17 21:53:14,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-17 21:53:14,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-17 21:53:14,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-17 21:53:14,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-17 21:53:14,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-17 21:53:14,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-17 21:53:14,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-17 21:53:14,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-17 21:53:14,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-17 21:53:14,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-17 21:53:14,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-17 21:53:14,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-17 21:53:14,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-17 21:53:14,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-17 21:53:14,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-17 21:53:14,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-17 21:53:14,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-17 21:53:14,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-17 21:53:14,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-17 21:53:14,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-17 21:53:14,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-17 21:53:14,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-17 21:53:14,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-17 21:53:14,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-17 21:53:14,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-17 21:53:14,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-17 21:53:14,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-17 21:53:14,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-17 21:53:14,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-17 21:53:14,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-17 21:53:14,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-17 21:53:14,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-17 21:53:14,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-17 21:53:14,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-17 21:53:14,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-17 21:53:14,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,845 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table47) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,845 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table48
2023-07-17 21:53:14,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv871358531=369, srv64697211=312, srv653261481=314, srv1778141916=154, srv716510755=323, srv372169288=255, srv568235512=298, srv710229516=322, srv537137712=293, srv1682791519=131, srv642353994=311, srv1046656068=13, srv993792848=391, srv1202667070=39, srv99567927=392, srv1607947050=111, srv1677371877=129, srv1763526149=150, srv1763378353=149, srv531263272=289, srv448398842=270, srv802808934=348, srv77960001=340, srv453521623=271, srv162773041=114, srv563606057=295, srv1659238910=122, srv1279307656=55, srv1914255334=183, srv1296605582=61, srv2131597846=222, srv1375359355=72, srv1405269336=79, srv175680261=147, srv282211488=242, srv1412891098=82, srv375712549=257, srv191234370=182, srv1574132168=106, srv1853511149=168, srv617306884=307, srv268601623=238, srv1400099806=78, srv477381292=275, srv1279442050=56, srv535853198=292, srv1767480590=152, srv2100700333=211, srv1187847151=37, srv791064637=345, srv74478935=330, srv1206084762=41, srv1497856295=97, srv897884865=377, srv398014971=261, srv786136704=342, srv1429879791=86, srv1201763981=38, srv1415213844=84, srv302220908=243, srv156683359=105, srv1974497084=192, srv535358845=291, srv627763604=308, srv732106437=326, srv1679724304=130, srv576770232=299, srv478480013=276, srv1237250370=47, srv1169018295=34, srv32320833=248, srv594880186=304, srv216306370=225, srv656484240=315, srv818754908=354, srv1321058011=63, srv1256345927=52, srv1670847243=126, srv1515243164=99, srv1781378955=156, srv508388209=278, srv1910886192=180, srv1718898730=139, srv772274482=337, srv1433624807=87, srv848605385=359, srv2107957639=212, srv270591905=240, srv2126706298=219, srv2080681743=209, srv1683990934=132, srv11526364=28, srv761020484=334, srv1720507603=141, srv266276730=236, srv935213051=386, srv923440665=383, srv1911104834=181, srv1944131651=187, srv1162841146=30, srv1921230216=185, srv319459319=247, srv1168022226=33, srv57689659=300, srv716533901=324, srv1255156178=50, srv441379967=267, srv806979625=350, srv788255577=344, srv976533744=389, srv1317853355=62, srv1491073587=96, srv777865249=339, srv2130226580=221, srv873230355=370, srv971370780=388, srv2008207413=197, srv989150800=390, srv737980208=328, srv862088563=363, srv1716783669=138, srv1801293056=160, srv1363984373=68, srv515711115=282, srv1378945327=75, srv17002515=136, srv853498273=361, srv1825292480=165, srv2124576425=217, srv1889349340=175, srv527691188=286, srv1226737728=44, srv1781498156=157, srv104267960=11, srv1663644309=124, srv1672213768=127, srv740402944=329, srv555807163=294, srv566277037=296, srv734882045=327, srv1143683685=27, srv1021400966=5, srv694407347=319, srv1626790310=113, srv303328507=244, srv1869166689=171, srv781623755=341, srv40741117=264, srv1958265988=190, srv592380483=303, srv483565354=277, srv1531731329=100, srv359746409=253, srv1271131029=54, srv1007512250=2, srv1783696565=158, srv1284150263=57, srv1648846971=118, srv120365207=40, srv263085176=235, srv535080964=290, srv824739010=357, srv744793832=331, srv1073394883=18, srv1113186104=23, srv1370321362=69, srv328204461=249, srv1604342762=109, srv266460489=237, srv313806624=245, srv1473408823=93, srv865692144=366, srv42814401=265, srv104065318=10, srv1599236554=108, srv1476834435=94, srv1673452142=128, srv716892727=325, srv1501773847=98, srv791504502=346, srv367902453=254, srv254349567=232, srv2126102976=218, srv252714068=231, srv916506189=380, srv687320190=318, srv1000433998=0, srv51396503=281, srv648464134=313, srv908419423=379, srv204022732=200, srv1901650254=177, srv200342397=196, srv765841762=335, srv1849125656=167, srv235281774=226, srv2137298641=224, srv517347076=283, srv1687711069=135, srv800105834=347, srv1609917009=112, srv1038797815=9, srv863216619=365, srv921796978=382, srv895924009=376, srv319002955=246, srv611122413=305, srv1942590787=186, srv529333113=288, srv1053973741=14, srv1988512138=194, srv1037112526=8, srv442327402=268, srv2062351281=204, srv1240518778=48, srv471289019=274, srv1857090224=170, srv1543025253=101, srv1915241294=184, srv238420451=228, srv1747796150=145, srv1101668258=21, srv1437034663=88, srv1173449481=35, srv582652595=301, srv1739043021=144, srv1733173130=143, srv465824154=272, srv14463216=91, srv1720161153=140, srv1549403995=102, srv235920151=227, srv1909060246=179, srv527988350=287, srv1801762669=161, srv89501442=375, srv442994824=269, srv1414012241=83, srv165153258=121, srv1766333515=151, srv2063438865=205, srv1071671801=17, srv1638570398=116, srv1035353226=7, srv1856921753=169, srv1887444158=173, srv1897306674=176, srv1255718022=51, srv1260078897=53, srv1372945218=70, srv1163715139=31, srv175471358=146, srv1558656747=104, srv1463869996=92, srv124825865=49, srv1142495625=26, srv1397803774=77, srv1644508836=117, srv1807320536=162, srv1165273546=32, srv1650978005=120, srv1374260725=71, srv2065239646=206, srv1685737274=134, srv878340336=371, srv329463090=250, srv2112675912=213, srv1378293943=74, srv787532288=343, srv1292867420=59, srv519831391=285, srv1002018470=1, srv822141051=356, srv1229740495=45, srv706370370=321, srv255741565=233, srv1177018836=36, srv1223505925=43, srv745532463=332, srv1820836786=163, srv2127145828=220, srv2124524081=216, srv665150476=316, srv2132621880=223, srv2051928856=203, srv1903063797=178, srv881186303=373, srv1758974023=148, srv270549378=239, srv2014789268=198, srv1663469360=123, srv1331983035=65, srv1768940632=153, srv2084732799=210, srv1043044287=12, srv630246195=309, srv86319792=364, srv37305654=256, srv1650394019=119, srv1888093001=174, srv512441512=280, srv813969264=352, srv277288989=241, srv2017714321=199, srv1410469782=81, srv751917673=333, srv1443060804=89, srv1997063872=195, srv404426071=263, srv1443287861=90, srv695697141=320, srv636958174=310, srv1105584096=22, srv583005569=302, srv92523166=384, srv330226906=251, srv1684865692=133, srv381463497=258, srv567942525=297, srv1010403208=3, srv881516937=374, srv140693587=80, srv1872213858=172, srv262210172=234, srv846799674=358, srv851169364=360, srv880017865=372, srv129190288=58, srv401606217=262, srv669535820=317, srv1325384866=64, srv1377673856=73, srv1416276025=85, srv430431276=266, srv81513922=353, srv2044458062=201, srv2118166427=214, srv1665530216=125, srv2045587532=202, srv1824773168=164, srv2071913725=208, srv1295499145=60, srv1780304939=155, srv612277490=306, srv102508625=6, srv1637539828=115, srv820424989=355, srv50966795=279, srv1950402166=188, srv1207208580=42, srv1057648579=16, srv1084295726=20, srv39165764=260, srv959379519=387, srv2066402828=207, srv1556810592=103, srv1232731779=46, srv1606144164=110, srv1487275322=95, srv519310224=284, srv775221203=338, srv1079168923=19, srv1957834842=189, srv866525142=367, srv243907419=229, srv248553307=230, srv344122075=252, srv467461515=273, srv805609280=349, srv1018507425=4, srv1827511993=166, srv1704639485=137, srv855754935=362, srv1057024901=15, srv1116429721=24, srv927375731=385, srv1383836323=76, srv1584407048=107, srv809779157=351, srv1786622589=159, srv869541705=368, srv1123072042=25, srv1726136626=142, srv135800579=67, srv1958676591=191, srv390748718=259, srv907223095=378, srv76871917=336, srv1160170031=29, srv2119727728=215, srv918100507=381, srv1352063642=66, srv1975716907=193} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-17 21:53:14,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-17 21:53:14,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-17 21:53:14,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-17 21:53:14,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-17 21:53:14,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-17 21:53:14,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-17 21:53:14,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-17 21:53:14,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-17 21:53:14,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-17 21:53:14,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-17 21:53:14,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-17 21:53:14,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-17 21:53:14,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-17 21:53:14,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-17 21:53:14,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-17 21:53:14,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-17 21:53:14,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-17 21:53:14,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-17 21:53:14,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-17 21:53:14,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-17 21:53:14,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-17 21:53:14,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-17 21:53:14,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-17 21:53:14,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-17 21:53:14,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-17 21:53:14,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-17 21:53:14,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-17 21:53:14,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-17 21:53:14,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-17 21:53:14,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-17 21:53:14,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-17 21:53:14,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-17 21:53:14,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-17 21:53:14,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-17 21:53:14,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-17 21:53:14,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-17 21:53:14,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-17 21:53:14,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-17 21:53:14,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-17 21:53:14,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-17 21:53:14,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-17 21:53:14,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-17 21:53:14,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-17 21:53:14,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-17 21:53:14,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-17 21:53:14,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-17 21:53:14,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-17 21:53:14,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-17 21:53:14,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-17 21:53:14,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-17 21:53:14,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-17 21:53:14,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-17 21:53:14,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-17 21:53:14,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-17 21:53:14,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-17 21:53:14,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-17 21:53:14,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-17 21:53:14,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-17 21:53:14,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-17 21:53:14,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-17 21:53:14,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-17 21:53:14,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-17 21:53:14,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-17 21:53:14,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-17 21:53:14,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-17 21:53:14,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-17 21:53:14,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-17 21:53:14,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-17 21:53:14,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-17 21:53:14,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-17 21:53:14,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-17 21:53:14,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-17 21:53:14,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-17 21:53:14,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-17 21:53:14,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-17 21:53:14,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-17 21:53:14,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-17 21:53:14,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-17 21:53:14,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-17 21:53:14,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-17 21:53:14,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-17 21:53:14,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-17 21:53:14,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-17 21:53:14,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-17 21:53:14,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-17 21:53:14,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-17 21:53:14,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-17 21:53:14,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-17 21:53:14,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-17 21:53:14,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-17 21:53:14,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-17 21:53:14,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-17 21:53:14,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-17 21:53:14,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-17 21:53:14,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-17 21:53:14,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-17 21:53:14,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-17 21:53:14,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-17 21:53:14,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-17 21:53:14,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-17 21:53:14,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-17 21:53:14,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-17 21:53:14,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-17 21:53:14,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-17 21:53:14,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-17 21:53:14,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-17 21:53:14,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-17 21:53:14,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-17 21:53:14,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-17 21:53:14,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-17 21:53:14,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-17 21:53:14,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-17 21:53:14,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-17 21:53:14,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-17 21:53:14,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-17 21:53:14,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-17 21:53:14,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-17 21:53:14,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-17 21:53:14,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-17 21:53:14,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-17 21:53:14,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-17 21:53:14,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-17 21:53:14,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-17 21:53:14,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-17 21:53:14,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-17 21:53:14,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-17 21:53:14,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-17 21:53:14,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-17 21:53:14,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-17 21:53:14,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-17 21:53:14,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-17 21:53:14,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-17 21:53:14,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-17 21:53:14,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-17 21:53:14,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-17 21:53:14,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-17 21:53:14,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-17 21:53:14,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-17 21:53:14,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-17 21:53:14,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-17 21:53:14,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-17 21:53:14,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-17 21:53:14,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-17 21:53:14,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-17 21:53:14,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-17 21:53:14,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-17 21:53:14,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-17 21:53:14,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-17 21:53:14,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-17 21:53:14,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-17 21:53:14,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-17 21:53:14,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-17 21:53:14,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-17 21:53:14,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-17 21:53:14,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-17 21:53:14,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-17 21:53:14,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-17 21:53:14,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-17 21:53:14,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-17 21:53:14,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-17 21:53:14,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-17 21:53:14,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-17 21:53:14,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-17 21:53:14,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-17 21:53:14,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-17 21:53:14,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-17 21:53:14,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-17 21:53:14,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-17 21:53:14,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-17 21:53:14,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-17 21:53:14,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-17 21:53:14,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-17 21:53:14,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-17 21:53:14,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-17 21:53:14,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-17 21:53:14,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-17 21:53:14,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-17 21:53:14,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-17 21:53:14,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-17 21:53:14,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-17 21:53:14,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-17 21:53:14,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-17 21:53:14,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-17 21:53:14,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-17 21:53:14,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-17 21:53:14,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-17 21:53:14,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-17 21:53:14,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-17 21:53:14,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-17 21:53:14,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-17 21:53:14,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-17 21:53:14,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-17 21:53:14,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-17 21:53:14,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-17 21:53:14,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-17 21:53:14,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-17 21:53:14,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-17 21:53:14,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-17 21:53:14,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-17 21:53:14,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-17 21:53:14,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-17 21:53:14,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-17 21:53:14,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-17 21:53:14,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-17 21:53:14,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-17 21:53:14,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-17 21:53:14,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-17 21:53:14,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-17 21:53:14,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-17 21:53:14,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-17 21:53:14,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-17 21:53:14,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-17 21:53:14,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-17 21:53:14,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-17 21:53:14,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-17 21:53:14,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-17 21:53:14,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-17 21:53:14,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-17 21:53:14,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-17 21:53:14,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-17 21:53:14,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-17 21:53:14,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-17 21:53:14,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-17 21:53:14,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-17 21:53:14,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-17 21:53:14,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-17 21:53:14,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-17 21:53:14,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-17 21:53:14,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-17 21:53:14,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-17 21:53:14,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-17 21:53:14,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-17 21:53:14,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-17 21:53:14,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-17 21:53:14,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-17 21:53:14,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-17 21:53:14,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-17 21:53:14,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-17 21:53:14,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-17 21:53:14,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-17 21:53:14,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-17 21:53:14,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-17 21:53:14,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-17 21:53:14,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-17 21:53:14,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-17 21:53:14,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-17 21:53:14,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-17 21:53:14,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-17 21:53:14,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-17 21:53:14,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-17 21:53:14,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-17 21:53:14,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-17 21:53:14,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-17 21:53:14,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-17 21:53:14,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-17 21:53:14,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-17 21:53:14,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-17 21:53:14,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-17 21:53:14,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-17 21:53:14,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-17 21:53:14,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-17 21:53:14,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-17 21:53:14,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-17 21:53:14,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-17 21:53:14,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-17 21:53:14,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-17 21:53:14,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-17 21:53:14,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-17 21:53:14,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-17 21:53:14,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-17 21:53:14,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-17 21:53:14,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-17 21:53:14,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-17 21:53:14,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-17 21:53:14,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-17 21:53:14,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-17 21:53:14,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-17 21:53:14,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-17 21:53:14,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-17 21:53:14,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-17 21:53:14,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-17 21:53:14,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-17 21:53:14,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-17 21:53:14,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-17 21:53:14,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-17 21:53:14,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-17 21:53:14,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-17 21:53:14,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-17 21:53:14,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-17 21:53:14,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-17 21:53:14,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-17 21:53:14,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-17 21:53:14,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-17 21:53:14,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-17 21:53:14,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-17 21:53:14,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-17 21:53:14,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-17 21:53:14,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-17 21:53:14,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-17 21:53:14,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-17 21:53:14,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-17 21:53:14,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-17 21:53:14,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-17 21:53:14,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-17 21:53:14,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-17 21:53:14,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-17 21:53:14,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-17 21:53:14,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-17 21:53:14,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-17 21:53:14,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-17 21:53:14,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-17 21:53:14,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-17 21:53:14,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-17 21:53:14,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-17 21:53:14,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-17 21:53:14,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-17 21:53:14,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-17 21:53:14,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-17 21:53:14,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-17 21:53:14,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-17 21:53:14,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-17 21:53:14,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-17 21:53:14,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-17 21:53:14,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-17 21:53:14,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-17 21:53:14,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-17 21:53:14,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-17 21:53:14,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-17 21:53:14,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-17 21:53:14,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-17 21:53:14,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-17 21:53:14,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-17 21:53:14,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-17 21:53:14,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-17 21:53:14,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-17 21:53:14,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-17 21:53:14,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-17 21:53:14,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-17 21:53:14,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-17 21:53:14,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-17 21:53:14,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-17 21:53:14,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-17 21:53:14,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-17 21:53:14,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-17 21:53:14,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-17 21:53:14,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-17 21:53:14,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-17 21:53:14,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-17 21:53:14,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-17 21:53:14,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-17 21:53:14,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-17 21:53:14,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-17 21:53:14,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-17 21:53:14,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-17 21:53:14,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-17 21:53:14,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-17 21:53:14,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-17 21:53:14,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-17 21:53:14,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-17 21:53:14,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-17 21:53:14,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-17 21:53:14,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-17 21:53:14,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-17 21:53:14,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-17 21:53:14,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-17 21:53:14,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-17 21:53:14,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-17 21:53:14,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-17 21:53:14,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-17 21:53:14,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-17 21:53:14,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-17 21:53:14,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-17 21:53:14,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-17 21:53:14,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-17 21:53:14,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-17 21:53:14,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-17 21:53:14,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-17 21:53:14,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-17 21:53:14,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-17 21:53:14,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-17 21:53:14,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-17 21:53:14,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-17 21:53:14,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,860 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table48) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,860 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table49
2023-07-17 21:53:14,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv871358531=369, srv64697211=312, srv653261481=314, srv1778141916=154, srv716510755=323, srv372169288=255, srv568235512=298, srv710229516=322, srv537137712=293, srv1682791519=131, srv642353994=311, srv1046656068=13, srv993792848=391, srv1202667070=39, srv99567927=392, srv1607947050=111, srv1677371877=129, srv1763526149=150, srv1763378353=149, srv531263272=289, srv448398842=270, srv802808934=348, srv77960001=340, srv453521623=271, srv162773041=114, srv563606057=295, srv1659238910=122, srv1279307656=55, srv1914255334=183, srv1296605582=61, srv2131597846=222, srv1375359355=72, srv1405269336=79, srv175680261=147, srv282211488=242, srv1412891098=82, srv375712549=257, srv191234370=182, srv1574132168=106, srv1853511149=168, srv617306884=307, srv268601623=238, srv1400099806=78, srv477381292=275, srv1279442050=56, srv535853198=292, srv1767480590=152, srv2100700333=211, srv1187847151=37, srv791064637=345, srv74478935=330, srv1206084762=41, srv1497856295=97, srv897884865=377, srv398014971=261, srv786136704=342, srv1429879791=86, srv1201763981=38, srv1415213844=84, srv302220908=243, srv156683359=105, srv1974497084=192, srv535358845=291, srv627763604=308, srv732106437=326, srv1679724304=130, srv576770232=299, srv478480013=276, srv1237250370=47, srv1169018295=34, srv32320833=248, srv594880186=304, srv216306370=225, srv656484240=315, srv818754908=354, srv1321058011=63, srv1256345927=52, srv1670847243=126, srv1515243164=99, srv1781378955=156, srv508388209=278, srv1910886192=180, srv1718898730=139, srv772274482=337, srv1433624807=87, srv848605385=359, srv2107957639=212, srv270591905=240, srv2126706298=219, srv2080681743=209, srv1683990934=132, srv11526364=28, srv761020484=334, srv1720507603=141, srv266276730=236, srv935213051=386, srv923440665=383, srv1911104834=181, srv1944131651=187, srv1162841146=30, srv1921230216=185, srv319459319=247, srv1168022226=33, srv57689659=300, srv716533901=324, srv1255156178=50, srv441379967=267, srv806979625=350, srv788255577=344, srv976533744=389, srv1317853355=62, srv1491073587=96, srv777865249=339, srv2130226580=221, srv873230355=370, srv971370780=388, srv2008207413=197, srv989150800=390, srv737980208=328, srv862088563=363, srv1716783669=138, srv1801293056=160, srv1363984373=68, srv515711115=282, srv1378945327=75, srv17002515=136, srv853498273=361, srv1825292480=165, srv2124576425=217, srv1889349340=175, srv527691188=286, srv1226737728=44, srv1781498156=157, srv104267960=11, srv1663644309=124, srv1672213768=127, srv740402944=329, srv555807163=294, srv566277037=296, srv734882045=327, srv1143683685=27, srv1021400966=5, srv694407347=319, srv1626790310=113, srv303328507=244, srv1869166689=171, srv781623755=341, srv40741117=264, srv1958265988=190, srv592380483=303, srv483565354=277, srv1531731329=100, srv359746409=253, srv1271131029=54, srv1007512250=2, srv1783696565=158, srv1284150263=57, srv1648846971=118, srv120365207=40, srv263085176=235, srv535080964=290, srv824739010=357, srv744793832=331, srv1073394883=18, srv1113186104=23, srv1370321362=69, srv328204461=249, srv1604342762=109, srv266460489=237, srv313806624=245, srv1473408823=93, srv865692144=366, srv42814401=265, srv104065318=10, srv1599236554=108, srv1476834435=94, srv1673452142=128, srv716892727=325, srv1501773847=98, srv791504502=346, srv367902453=254, srv254349567=232, srv2126102976=218, srv252714068=231, srv916506189=380, srv687320190=318, srv1000433998=0, srv51396503=281, srv648464134=313, srv908419423=379, srv204022732=200, srv1901650254=177, srv200342397=196, srv765841762=335, srv1849125656=167, srv235281774=226, srv2137298641=224, srv517347076=283, srv1687711069=135, srv800105834=347, srv1609917009=112, srv1038797815=9, srv863216619=365, srv921796978=382, srv895924009=376, srv319002955=246, srv611122413=305, srv1942590787=186, srv529333113=288, srv1053973741=14, srv1988512138=194, srv1037112526=8, srv442327402=268, srv2062351281=204, srv1240518778=48, srv471289019=274, srv1857090224=170, srv1543025253=101, srv1915241294=184, srv238420451=228, srv1747796150=145, srv1101668258=21, srv1437034663=88, srv1173449481=35, srv582652595=301, srv1739043021=144, srv1733173130=143, srv465824154=272, srv14463216=91, srv1720161153=140, srv1549403995=102, srv235920151=227, srv1909060246=179, srv527988350=287, srv1801762669=161, srv89501442=375, srv442994824=269, srv1414012241=83, srv165153258=121, srv1766333515=151, srv2063438865=205, srv1071671801=17, srv1638570398=116, srv1035353226=7, srv1856921753=169, srv1887444158=173, srv1897306674=176, srv1255718022=51, srv1260078897=53, srv1372945218=70, srv1163715139=31, srv175471358=146, srv1558656747=104, srv1463869996=92, srv124825865=49, srv1142495625=26, srv1397803774=77, srv1644508836=117, srv1807320536=162, srv1165273546=32, srv1650978005=120, srv1374260725=71, srv2065239646=206, srv1685737274=134, srv878340336=371, srv329463090=250, srv2112675912=213, srv1378293943=74, srv787532288=343, srv1292867420=59, srv519831391=285, srv1002018470=1, srv822141051=356, srv1229740495=45, srv706370370=321, srv255741565=233, srv1177018836=36, srv1223505925=43, srv745532463=332, srv1820836786=163, srv2127145828=220, srv2124524081=216, srv665150476=316, srv2132621880=223, srv2051928856=203, srv1903063797=178, srv881186303=373, srv1758974023=148, srv270549378=239, srv2014789268=198, srv1663469360=123, srv1331983035=65, srv1768940632=153, srv2084732799=210, srv1043044287=12, srv630246195=309, srv86319792=364, srv37305654=256, srv1650394019=119, srv1888093001=174, srv512441512=280, srv813969264=352, srv277288989=241, srv2017714321=199, srv1410469782=81, srv751917673=333, srv1443060804=89, srv1997063872=195, srv404426071=263, srv1443287861=90, srv695697141=320, srv636958174=310, srv1105584096=22, srv583005569=302, srv92523166=384, srv330226906=251, srv1684865692=133, srv381463497=258, srv567942525=297, srv1010403208=3, srv881516937=374, srv140693587=80, srv1872213858=172, srv262210172=234, srv846799674=358, srv851169364=360, srv880017865=372, srv129190288=58, srv401606217=262, srv669535820=317, srv1325384866=64, srv1377673856=73, srv1416276025=85, srv430431276=266, srv81513922=353, srv2044458062=201, srv2118166427=214, srv1665530216=125, srv2045587532=202, srv1824773168=164, srv2071913725=208, srv1295499145=60, srv1780304939=155, srv612277490=306, srv102508625=6, srv1637539828=115, srv820424989=355, srv50966795=279, srv1950402166=188, srv1207208580=42, srv1057648579=16, srv1084295726=20, srv39165764=260, srv959379519=387, srv2066402828=207, srv1556810592=103, srv1232731779=46, srv1606144164=110, srv1487275322=95, srv519310224=284, srv775221203=338, srv1079168923=19, srv1957834842=189, srv866525142=367, srv243907419=229, srv248553307=230, srv344122075=252, srv467461515=273, srv805609280=349, srv1018507425=4, srv1827511993=166, srv1704639485=137, srv855754935=362, srv1057024901=15, srv1116429721=24, srv927375731=385, srv1383836323=76, srv1584407048=107, srv809779157=351, srv1786622589=159, srv869541705=368, srv1123072042=25, srv1726136626=142, srv135800579=67, srv1958676591=191, srv390748718=259, srv907223095=378, srv76871917=336, srv1160170031=29, srv2119727728=215, srv918100507=381, srv1352063642=66, srv1975716907=193} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-17 21:53:14,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-17 21:53:14,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-17 21:53:14,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-17 21:53:14,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-17 21:53:14,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-17 21:53:14,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-17 21:53:14,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-17 21:53:14,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-17 21:53:14,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-17 21:53:14,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-17 21:53:14,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-17 21:53:14,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-17 21:53:14,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-17 21:53:14,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-17 21:53:14,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-17 21:53:14,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-17 21:53:14,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-17 21:53:14,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-17 21:53:14,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-17 21:53:14,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-17 21:53:14,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-17 21:53:14,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-17 21:53:14,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-17 21:53:14,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-17 21:53:14,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-17 21:53:14,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-17 21:53:14,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-17 21:53:14,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-17 21:53:14,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-17 21:53:14,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-17 21:53:14,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-17 21:53:14,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-17 21:53:14,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-17 21:53:14,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-17 21:53:14,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-17 21:53:14,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-17 21:53:14,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-17 21:53:14,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-17 21:53:14,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-17 21:53:14,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-17 21:53:14,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-17 21:53:14,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-17 21:53:14,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-17 21:53:14,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-17 21:53:14,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-17 21:53:14,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-17 21:53:14,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-17 21:53:14,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-17 21:53:14,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-17 21:53:14,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-17 21:53:14,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-17 21:53:14,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-17 21:53:14,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-17 21:53:14,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-17 21:53:14,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-17 21:53:14,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-17 21:53:14,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-17 21:53:14,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-17 21:53:14,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-17 21:53:14,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-17 21:53:14,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-17 21:53:14,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-17 21:53:14,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-17 21:53:14,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-17 21:53:14,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-17 21:53:14,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-17 21:53:14,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-17 21:53:14,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-17 21:53:14,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-17 21:53:14,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-17 21:53:14,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-17 21:53:14,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-17 21:53:14,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-17 21:53:14,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-17 21:53:14,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-17 21:53:14,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-17 21:53:14,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-17 21:53:14,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-17 21:53:14,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-17 21:53:14,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-17 21:53:14,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-17 21:53:14,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-17 21:53:14,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-17 21:53:14,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-17 21:53:14,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-17 21:53:14,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-17 21:53:14,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-17 21:53:14,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-17 21:53:14,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-17 21:53:14,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-17 21:53:14,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-17 21:53:14,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-17 21:53:14,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-17 21:53:14,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-17 21:53:14,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-17 21:53:14,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-17 21:53:14,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-17 21:53:14,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-17 21:53:14,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-17 21:53:14,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-17 21:53:14,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-17 21:53:14,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-17 21:53:14,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-17 21:53:14,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-17 21:53:14,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-17 21:53:14,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-17 21:53:14,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-17 21:53:14,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-17 21:53:14,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-17 21:53:14,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-17 21:53:14,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-17 21:53:14,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-17 21:53:14,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-17 21:53:14,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-17 21:53:14,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-17 21:53:14,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-17 21:53:14,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-17 21:53:14,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-17 21:53:14,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-17 21:53:14,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-17 21:53:14,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-17 21:53:14,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-17 21:53:14,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-17 21:53:14,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-17 21:53:14,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-17 21:53:14,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-17 21:53:14,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-17 21:53:14,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-17 21:53:14,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-17 21:53:14,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-17 21:53:14,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-17 21:53:14,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-17 21:53:14,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-17 21:53:14,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-17 21:53:14,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-17 21:53:14,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-17 21:53:14,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-17 21:53:14,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-17 21:53:14,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-17 21:53:14,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-17 21:53:14,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-17 21:53:14,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-17 21:53:14,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-17 21:53:14,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-17 21:53:14,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-17 21:53:14,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-17 21:53:14,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-17 21:53:14,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-17 21:53:14,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-17 21:53:14,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-17 21:53:14,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-17 21:53:14,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-17 21:53:14,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-17 21:53:14,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-17 21:53:14,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-17 21:53:14,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-17 21:53:14,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-17 21:53:14,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-17 21:53:14,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-17 21:53:14,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-17 21:53:14,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-17 21:53:14,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-17 21:53:14,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-17 21:53:14,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-17 21:53:14,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-17 21:53:14,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-17 21:53:14,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-17 21:53:14,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-17 21:53:14,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-17 21:53:14,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-17 21:53:14,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-17 21:53:14,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-17 21:53:14,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-17 21:53:14,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-17 21:53:14,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-17 21:53:14,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-17 21:53:14,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-17 21:53:14,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-17 21:53:14,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-17 21:53:14,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-17 21:53:14,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-17 21:53:14,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-17 21:53:14,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-17 21:53:14,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-17 21:53:14,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-17 21:53:14,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-17 21:53:14,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-17 21:53:14,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-17 21:53:14,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-17 21:53:14,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-17 21:53:14,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-17 21:53:14,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-17 21:53:14,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-17 21:53:14,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-17 21:53:14,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-17 21:53:14,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-17 21:53:14,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-17 21:53:14,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-17 21:53:14,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-17 21:53:14,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-17 21:53:14,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-17 21:53:14,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-17 21:53:14,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-17 21:53:14,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-17 21:53:14,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-17 21:53:14,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-17 21:53:14,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-17 21:53:14,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-17 21:53:14,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-17 21:53:14,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-17 21:53:14,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-17 21:53:14,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-17 21:53:14,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-17 21:53:14,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-17 21:53:14,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-17 21:53:14,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-17 21:53:14,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-17 21:53:14,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-17 21:53:14,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-17 21:53:14,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-17 21:53:14,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-17 21:53:14,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-17 21:53:14,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-17 21:53:14,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-17 21:53:14,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-17 21:53:14,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-17 21:53:14,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-17 21:53:14,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-17 21:53:14,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-17 21:53:14,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-17 21:53:14,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-17 21:53:14,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-17 21:53:14,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-17 21:53:14,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-17 21:53:14,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-17 21:53:14,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-17 21:53:14,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-17 21:53:14,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-17 21:53:14,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-17 21:53:14,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-17 21:53:14,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-17 21:53:14,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-17 21:53:14,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-17 21:53:14,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-17 21:53:14,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-17 21:53:14,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-17 21:53:14,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-17 21:53:14,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-17 21:53:14,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-17 21:53:14,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-17 21:53:14,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-17 21:53:14,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-17 21:53:14,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-17 21:53:14,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-17 21:53:14,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-17 21:53:14,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-17 21:53:14,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-17 21:53:14,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-17 21:53:14,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-17 21:53:14,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-17 21:53:14,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-17 21:53:14,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-17 21:53:14,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-17 21:53:14,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-17 21:53:14,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-17 21:53:14,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-17 21:53:14,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-17 21:53:14,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-17 21:53:14,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-17 21:53:14,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-17 21:53:14,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-17 21:53:14,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-17 21:53:14,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-17 21:53:14,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-17 21:53:14,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-17 21:53:14,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-17 21:53:14,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-17 21:53:14,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-17 21:53:14,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-17 21:53:14,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-17 21:53:14,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-17 21:53:14,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-17 21:53:14,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-17 21:53:14,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-17 21:53:14,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-17 21:53:14,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-17 21:53:14,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-17 21:53:14,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-17 21:53:14,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-17 21:53:14,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-17 21:53:14,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-17 21:53:14,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-17 21:53:14,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-17 21:53:14,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-17 21:53:14,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-17 21:53:14,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-17 21:53:14,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-17 21:53:14,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-17 21:53:14,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-17 21:53:14,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-17 21:53:14,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-17 21:53:14,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-17 21:53:14,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-17 21:53:14,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-17 21:53:14,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-17 21:53:14,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-17 21:53:14,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-17 21:53:14,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-17 21:53:14,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-17 21:53:14,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-17 21:53:14,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-17 21:53:14,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-17 21:53:14,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-17 21:53:14,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-17 21:53:14,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-17 21:53:14,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-17 21:53:14,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-17 21:53:14,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-17 21:53:14,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-17 21:53:14,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-17 21:53:14,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-17 21:53:14,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-17 21:53:14,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-17 21:53:14,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-17 21:53:14,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-17 21:53:14,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-17 21:53:14,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-17 21:53:14,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-17 21:53:14,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-17 21:53:14,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-17 21:53:14,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-17 21:53:14,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-17 21:53:14,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-17 21:53:14,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-17 21:53:14,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-17 21:53:14,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-17 21:53:14,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-17 21:53:14,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-17 21:53:14,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-17 21:53:14,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-17 21:53:14,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-17 21:53:14,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-17 21:53:14,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-17 21:53:14,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-17 21:53:14,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-17 21:53:14,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-17 21:53:14,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-17 21:53:14,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-17 21:53:14,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-17 21:53:14,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-17 21:53:14,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-17 21:53:14,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-17 21:53:14,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-17 21:53:14,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-17 21:53:14,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-17 21:53:14,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-17 21:53:14,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-17 21:53:14,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-17 21:53:14,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-17 21:53:14,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-17 21:53:14,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-17 21:53:14,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-17 21:53:14,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-17 21:53:14,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-17 21:53:14,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-17 21:53:14,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-17 21:53:14,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-17 21:53:14,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-17 21:53:14,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-17 21:53:14,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-17 21:53:14,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-17 21:53:14,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-17 21:53:14,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-17 21:53:14,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-17 21:53:14,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-17 21:53:14,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-17 21:53:14,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-17 21:53:14,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-17 21:53:14,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-17 21:53:14,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-17 21:53:14,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-17 21:53:14,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-17 21:53:14,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,875 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table49) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,875 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table40
2023-07-17 21:53:14,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv871358531=369, srv64697211=312, srv653261481=314, srv1778141916=154, srv716510755=323, srv372169288=255, srv568235512=298, srv710229516=322, srv537137712=293, srv1682791519=131, srv642353994=311, srv1046656068=13, srv993792848=391, srv1202667070=39, srv99567927=392, srv1607947050=111, srv1677371877=129, srv1763526149=150, srv1763378353=149, srv531263272=289, srv448398842=270, srv802808934=348, srv77960001=340, srv453521623=271, srv162773041=114, srv563606057=295, srv1659238910=122, srv1279307656=55, srv1914255334=183, srv1296605582=61, srv2131597846=222, srv1375359355=72, srv1405269336=79, srv175680261=147, srv282211488=242, srv1412891098=82, srv375712549=257, srv191234370=182, srv1574132168=106, srv1853511149=168, srv617306884=307, srv268601623=238, srv1400099806=78, srv477381292=275, srv1279442050=56, srv535853198=292, srv1767480590=152, srv2100700333=211, srv1187847151=37, srv791064637=345, srv74478935=330, srv1206084762=41, srv1497856295=97, srv897884865=377, srv398014971=261, srv786136704=342, srv1429879791=86, srv1201763981=38, srv1415213844=84, srv302220908=243, srv156683359=105, srv1974497084=192, srv535358845=291, srv627763604=308, srv732106437=326, srv1679724304=130, srv576770232=299, srv478480013=276, srv1237250370=47, srv1169018295=34, srv32320833=248, srv594880186=304, srv216306370=225, srv656484240=315, srv818754908=354, srv1321058011=63, srv1256345927=52, srv1670847243=126, srv1515243164=99, srv1781378955=156, srv508388209=278, srv1910886192=180, srv1718898730=139, srv772274482=337, srv1433624807=87, srv848605385=359, srv2107957639=212, srv270591905=240, srv2126706298=219, srv2080681743=209, srv1683990934=132, srv11526364=28, srv761020484=334, srv1720507603=141, srv266276730=236, srv935213051=386, srv923440665=383, srv1911104834=181, srv1944131651=187, srv1162841146=30, srv1921230216=185, srv319459319=247, srv1168022226=33, srv57689659=300, srv716533901=324, srv1255156178=50, srv441379967=267, srv806979625=350, srv788255577=344, srv976533744=389, srv1317853355=62, srv1491073587=96, srv777865249=339, srv2130226580=221, srv873230355=370, srv971370780=388, srv2008207413=197, srv989150800=390, srv737980208=328, srv862088563=363, srv1716783669=138, srv1801293056=160, srv1363984373=68, srv515711115=282, srv1378945327=75, srv17002515=136, srv853498273=361, srv1825292480=165, srv2124576425=217, srv1889349340=175, srv527691188=286, srv1226737728=44, srv1781498156=157, srv104267960=11, srv1663644309=124, srv1672213768=127, srv740402944=329, srv555807163=294, srv566277037=296, srv734882045=327, srv1143683685=27, srv1021400966=5, srv694407347=319, srv1626790310=113, srv303328507=244, srv1869166689=171, srv781623755=341, srv40741117=264, srv1958265988=190, srv592380483=303, srv483565354=277, srv1531731329=100, srv359746409=253, srv1271131029=54, srv1007512250=2, srv1783696565=158, srv1284150263=57, srv1648846971=118, srv120365207=40, srv263085176=235, srv535080964=290, srv824739010=357, srv744793832=331, srv1073394883=18, srv1113186104=23, srv1370321362=69, srv328204461=249, srv1604342762=109, srv266460489=237, srv313806624=245, srv1473408823=93, srv865692144=366, srv42814401=265, srv104065318=10, srv1599236554=108, srv1476834435=94, srv1673452142=128, srv716892727=325, srv1501773847=98, srv791504502=346, srv367902453=254, srv254349567=232, srv2126102976=218, srv252714068=231, srv916506189=380, srv687320190=318, srv1000433998=0, srv51396503=281, srv648464134=313, srv908419423=379, srv204022732=200, srv1901650254=177, srv200342397=196, srv765841762=335, srv1849125656=167, srv235281774=226, srv2137298641=224, srv517347076=283, srv1687711069=135, srv800105834=347, srv1609917009=112, srv1038797815=9, srv863216619=365, srv921796978=382, srv895924009=376, srv319002955=246, srv611122413=305, srv1942590787=186, srv529333113=288, srv1053973741=14, srv1988512138=194, srv1037112526=8, srv442327402=268, srv2062351281=204, srv1240518778=48, srv471289019=274, srv1857090224=170, srv1543025253=101, srv1915241294=184, srv238420451=228, srv1747796150=145, srv1101668258=21, srv1437034663=88, srv1173449481=35, srv582652595=301, srv1739043021=144, srv1733173130=143, srv465824154=272, srv14463216=91, srv1720161153=140, srv1549403995=102, srv235920151=227, srv1909060246=179, srv527988350=287, srv1801762669=161, srv89501442=375, srv442994824=269, srv1414012241=83, srv165153258=121, srv1766333515=151, srv2063438865=205, srv1071671801=17, srv1638570398=116, srv1035353226=7, srv1856921753=169, srv1887444158=173, srv1897306674=176, srv1255718022=51, srv1260078897=53, srv1372945218=70, srv1163715139=31, srv175471358=146, srv1558656747=104, srv1463869996=92, srv124825865=49, srv1142495625=26, srv1397803774=77, srv1644508836=117, srv1807320536=162, srv1165273546=32, srv1650978005=120, srv1374260725=71, srv2065239646=206, srv1685737274=134, srv878340336=371, srv329463090=250, srv2112675912=213, srv1378293943=74, srv787532288=343, srv1292867420=59, srv519831391=285, srv1002018470=1, srv822141051=356, srv1229740495=45, srv706370370=321, srv255741565=233, srv1177018836=36, srv1223505925=43, srv745532463=332, srv1820836786=163, srv2127145828=220, srv2124524081=216, srv665150476=316, srv2132621880=223, srv2051928856=203, srv1903063797=178, srv881186303=373, srv1758974023=148, srv270549378=239, srv2014789268=198, srv1663469360=123, srv1331983035=65, srv1768940632=153, srv2084732799=210, srv1043044287=12, srv630246195=309, srv86319792=364, srv37305654=256, srv1650394019=119, srv1888093001=174, srv512441512=280, srv813969264=352, srv277288989=241, srv2017714321=199, srv1410469782=81, srv751917673=333, srv1443060804=89, srv1997063872=195, srv404426071=263, srv1443287861=90, srv695697141=320, srv636958174=310, srv1105584096=22, srv583005569=302, srv92523166=384, srv330226906=251, srv1684865692=133, srv381463497=258, srv567942525=297, srv1010403208=3, srv881516937=374, srv140693587=80, srv1872213858=172, srv262210172=234, srv846799674=358, srv851169364=360, srv880017865=372, srv129190288=58, srv401606217=262, srv669535820=317, srv1325384866=64, srv1377673856=73, srv1416276025=85, srv430431276=266, srv81513922=353, srv2044458062=201, srv2118166427=214, srv1665530216=125, srv2045587532=202, srv1824773168=164, srv2071913725=208, srv1295499145=60, srv1780304939=155, srv612277490=306, srv102508625=6, srv1637539828=115, srv820424989=355, srv50966795=279, srv1950402166=188, srv1207208580=42, srv1057648579=16, srv1084295726=20, srv39165764=260, srv959379519=387, srv2066402828=207, srv1556810592=103, srv1232731779=46, srv1606144164=110, srv1487275322=95, srv519310224=284, srv775221203=338, srv1079168923=19, srv1957834842=189, srv866525142=367, srv243907419=229, srv248553307=230, srv344122075=252, srv467461515=273, srv805609280=349, srv1018507425=4, srv1827511993=166, srv1704639485=137, srv855754935=362, srv1057024901=15, srv1116429721=24, srv927375731=385, srv1383836323=76, srv1584407048=107, srv809779157=351, srv1786622589=159, srv869541705=368, srv1123072042=25, srv1726136626=142, srv135800579=67, srv1958676591=191, srv390748718=259, srv907223095=378, srv76871917=336, srv1160170031=29, srv2119727728=215, srv918100507=381, srv1352063642=66, srv1975716907=193} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-17 21:53:14,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-17 21:53:14,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-17 21:53:14,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-17 21:53:14,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-17 21:53:14,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-17 21:53:14,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-17 21:53:14,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-17 21:53:14,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-17 21:53:14,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-17 21:53:14,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-17 21:53:14,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-17 21:53:14,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-17 21:53:14,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-17 21:53:14,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-17 21:53:14,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-17 21:53:14,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-17 21:53:14,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-17 21:53:14,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-17 21:53:14,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-17 21:53:14,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-17 21:53:14,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-17 21:53:14,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-17 21:53:14,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-17 21:53:14,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-17 21:53:14,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-17 21:53:14,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-17 21:53:14,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-17 21:53:14,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-17 21:53:14,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-17 21:53:14,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-17 21:53:14,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-17 21:53:14,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-17 21:53:14,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-17 21:53:14,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-17 21:53:14,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-17 21:53:14,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-17 21:53:14,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-17 21:53:14,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-17 21:53:14,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-17 21:53:14,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-17 21:53:14,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-17 21:53:14,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-17 21:53:14,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-17 21:53:14,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-17 21:53:14,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-17 21:53:14,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-17 21:53:14,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-17 21:53:14,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-17 21:53:14,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-17 21:53:14,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-17 21:53:14,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-17 21:53:14,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-17 21:53:14,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-17 21:53:14,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-17 21:53:14,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-17 21:53:14,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-17 21:53:14,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-17 21:53:14,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-17 21:53:14,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-17 21:53:14,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-17 21:53:14,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-17 21:53:14,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-17 21:53:14,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-17 21:53:14,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-17 21:53:14,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-17 21:53:14,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-17 21:53:14,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-17 21:53:14,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-17 21:53:14,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-17 21:53:14,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-17 21:53:14,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-17 21:53:14,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-17 21:53:14,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-17 21:53:14,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-17 21:53:14,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-17 21:53:14,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-17 21:53:14,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-17 21:53:14,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-17 21:53:14,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-17 21:53:14,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-17 21:53:14,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-17 21:53:14,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-17 21:53:14,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-17 21:53:14,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-17 21:53:14,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-17 21:53:14,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-17 21:53:14,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-17 21:53:14,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-17 21:53:14,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-17 21:53:14,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-17 21:53:14,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-17 21:53:14,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-17 21:53:14,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-17 21:53:14,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-17 21:53:14,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-17 21:53:14,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-17 21:53:14,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-17 21:53:14,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-17 21:53:14,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-17 21:53:14,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-17 21:53:14,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-17 21:53:14,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-17 21:53:14,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-17 21:53:14,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-17 21:53:14,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-17 21:53:14,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-17 21:53:14,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-17 21:53:14,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-17 21:53:14,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-17 21:53:14,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-17 21:53:14,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-17 21:53:14,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-17 21:53:14,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-17 21:53:14,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-17 21:53:14,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-17 21:53:14,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-17 21:53:14,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-17 21:53:14,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-17 21:53:14,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-17 21:53:14,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-17 21:53:14,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-17 21:53:14,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-17 21:53:14,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-17 21:53:14,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-17 21:53:14,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-17 21:53:14,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-17 21:53:14,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-17 21:53:14,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-17 21:53:14,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-17 21:53:14,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-17 21:53:14,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-17 21:53:14,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-17 21:53:14,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-17 21:53:14,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-17 21:53:14,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-17 21:53:14,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-17 21:53:14,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-17 21:53:14,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-17 21:53:14,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-17 21:53:14,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-17 21:53:14,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-17 21:53:14,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-17 21:53:14,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-17 21:53:14,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-17 21:53:14,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-17 21:53:14,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-17 21:53:14,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-17 21:53:14,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-17 21:53:14,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-17 21:53:14,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-17 21:53:14,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-17 21:53:14,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-17 21:53:14,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-17 21:53:14,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-17 21:53:14,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-17 21:53:14,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-17 21:53:14,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-17 21:53:14,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-17 21:53:14,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-17 21:53:14,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-17 21:53:14,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-17 21:53:14,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-17 21:53:14,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-17 21:53:14,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-17 21:53:14,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-17 21:53:14,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-17 21:53:14,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-17 21:53:14,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-17 21:53:14,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-17 21:53:14,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-17 21:53:14,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-17 21:53:14,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-17 21:53:14,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-17 21:53:14,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-17 21:53:14,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-17 21:53:14,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-17 21:53:14,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-17 21:53:14,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-17 21:53:14,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-17 21:53:14,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-17 21:53:14,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-17 21:53:14,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-17 21:53:14,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-17 21:53:14,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-17 21:53:14,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-17 21:53:14,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-17 21:53:14,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-17 21:53:14,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-17 21:53:14,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-17 21:53:14,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-17 21:53:14,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-17 21:53:14,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-17 21:53:14,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-17 21:53:14,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-17 21:53:14,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-17 21:53:14,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-17 21:53:14,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-17 21:53:14,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-17 21:53:14,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-17 21:53:14,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-17 21:53:14,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-17 21:53:14,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-17 21:53:14,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-17 21:53:14,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-17 21:53:14,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-17 21:53:14,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-17 21:53:14,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-17 21:53:14,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-17 21:53:14,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-17 21:53:14,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-17 21:53:14,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-17 21:53:14,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-17 21:53:14,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-17 21:53:14,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-17 21:53:14,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-17 21:53:14,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-17 21:53:14,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-17 21:53:14,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-17 21:53:14,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-17 21:53:14,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-17 21:53:14,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-17 21:53:14,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-17 21:53:14,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-17 21:53:14,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-17 21:53:14,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-17 21:53:14,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-17 21:53:14,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-17 21:53:14,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-17 21:53:14,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-17 21:53:14,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-17 21:53:14,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-17 21:53:14,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-17 21:53:14,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-17 21:53:14,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-17 21:53:14,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-17 21:53:14,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-17 21:53:14,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-17 21:53:14,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-17 21:53:14,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-17 21:53:14,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-17 21:53:14,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-17 21:53:14,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-17 21:53:14,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-17 21:53:14,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-17 21:53:14,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-17 21:53:14,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-17 21:53:14,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-17 21:53:14,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-17 21:53:14,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-17 21:53:14,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-17 21:53:14,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-17 21:53:14,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-17 21:53:14,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-17 21:53:14,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-17 21:53:14,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-17 21:53:14,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-17 21:53:14,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-17 21:53:14,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-17 21:53:14,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-17 21:53:14,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-17 21:53:14,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-17 21:53:14,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-17 21:53:14,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-17 21:53:14,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-17 21:53:14,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-17 21:53:14,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-17 21:53:14,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-17 21:53:14,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-17 21:53:14,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-17 21:53:14,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-17 21:53:14,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-17 21:53:14,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-17 21:53:14,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-17 21:53:14,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-17 21:53:14,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-17 21:53:14,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-17 21:53:14,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-17 21:53:14,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-17 21:53:14,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-17 21:53:14,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-17 21:53:14,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-17 21:53:14,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-17 21:53:14,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-17 21:53:14,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-17 21:53:14,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-17 21:53:14,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-17 21:53:14,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-17 21:53:14,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-17 21:53:14,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-17 21:53:14,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-17 21:53:14,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-17 21:53:14,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-17 21:53:14,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-17 21:53:14,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-17 21:53:14,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-17 21:53:14,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-17 21:53:14,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-17 21:53:14,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-17 21:53:14,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-17 21:53:14,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-17 21:53:14,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-17 21:53:14,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-17 21:53:14,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-17 21:53:14,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-17 21:53:14,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-17 21:53:14,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-17 21:53:14,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-17 21:53:14,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-17 21:53:14,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-17 21:53:14,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-17 21:53:14,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-17 21:53:14,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-17 21:53:14,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-17 21:53:14,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-17 21:53:14,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-17 21:53:14,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-17 21:53:14,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-17 21:53:14,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-17 21:53:14,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-17 21:53:14,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-17 21:53:14,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-17 21:53:14,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-17 21:53:14,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-17 21:53:14,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-17 21:53:14,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-17 21:53:14,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-17 21:53:14,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-17 21:53:14,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-17 21:53:14,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-17 21:53:14,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-17 21:53:14,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-17 21:53:14,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-17 21:53:14,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-17 21:53:14,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-17 21:53:14,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-17 21:53:14,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-17 21:53:14,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-17 21:53:14,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-17 21:53:14,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-17 21:53:14,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-17 21:53:14,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-17 21:53:14,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-17 21:53:14,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-17 21:53:14,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-17 21:53:14,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-17 21:53:14,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-17 21:53:14,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-17 21:53:14,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-17 21:53:14,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-17 21:53:14,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-17 21:53:14,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-17 21:53:14,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-17 21:53:14,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-17 21:53:14,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-17 21:53:14,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-17 21:53:14,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-17 21:53:14,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-17 21:53:14,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-17 21:53:14,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-17 21:53:14,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-17 21:53:14,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-17 21:53:14,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-17 21:53:14,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-17 21:53:14,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-17 21:53:14,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-17 21:53:14,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-17 21:53:14,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-17 21:53:14,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-17 21:53:14,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-17 21:53:14,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-17 21:53:14,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-17 21:53:14,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-17 21:53:14,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-17 21:53:14,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-17 21:53:14,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-17 21:53:14,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-17 21:53:14,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-17 21:53:14,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-17 21:53:14,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-17 21:53:14,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-17 21:53:14,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-17 21:53:14,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-17 21:53:14,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,890 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table40) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,890 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table41
2023-07-17 21:53:14,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv871358531=369, srv64697211=312, srv653261481=314, srv1778141916=154, srv716510755=323, srv372169288=255, srv568235512=298, srv710229516=322, srv537137712=293, srv1682791519=131, srv642353994=311, srv1046656068=13, srv993792848=391, srv1202667070=39, srv99567927=392, srv1607947050=111, srv1677371877=129, srv1763526149=150, srv1763378353=149, srv531263272=289, srv448398842=270, srv802808934=348, srv77960001=340, srv453521623=271, srv162773041=114, srv563606057=295, srv1659238910=122, srv1279307656=55, srv1914255334=183, srv1296605582=61, srv2131597846=222, srv1375359355=72, srv1405269336=79, srv175680261=147, srv282211488=242, srv1412891098=82, srv375712549=257, srv191234370=182, srv1574132168=106, srv1853511149=168, srv617306884=307, srv268601623=238, srv1400099806=78, srv477381292=275, srv1279442050=56, srv535853198=292, srv1767480590=152, srv2100700333=211, srv1187847151=37, srv791064637=345, srv74478935=330, srv1206084762=41, srv1497856295=97, srv897884865=377, srv398014971=261, srv786136704=342, srv1429879791=86, srv1201763981=38, srv1415213844=84, srv302220908=243, srv156683359=105, srv1974497084=192, srv535358845=291, srv627763604=308, srv732106437=326, srv1679724304=130, srv576770232=299, srv478480013=276, srv1237250370=47, srv1169018295=34, srv32320833=248, srv594880186=304, srv216306370=225, srv656484240=315, srv818754908=354, srv1321058011=63, srv1256345927=52, srv1670847243=126, srv1515243164=99, srv1781378955=156, srv508388209=278, srv1910886192=180, srv1718898730=139, srv772274482=337, srv1433624807=87, srv848605385=359, srv2107957639=212, srv270591905=240, srv2126706298=219, srv2080681743=209, srv1683990934=132, srv11526364=28, srv761020484=334, srv1720507603=141, srv266276730=236, srv935213051=386, srv923440665=383, srv1911104834=181, srv1944131651=187, srv1162841146=30, srv1921230216=185, srv319459319=247, srv1168022226=33, srv57689659=300, srv716533901=324, srv1255156178=50, srv441379967=267, srv806979625=350, srv788255577=344, srv976533744=389, srv1317853355=62, srv1491073587=96, srv777865249=339, srv2130226580=221, srv873230355=370, srv971370780=388, srv2008207413=197, srv989150800=390, srv737980208=328, srv862088563=363, srv1716783669=138, srv1801293056=160, srv1363984373=68, srv515711115=282, srv1378945327=75, srv17002515=136, srv853498273=361, srv1825292480=165, srv2124576425=217, srv1889349340=175, srv527691188=286, srv1226737728=44, srv1781498156=157, srv104267960=11, srv1663644309=124, srv1672213768=127, srv740402944=329, srv555807163=294, srv566277037=296, srv734882045=327, srv1143683685=27, srv1021400966=5, srv694407347=319, srv1626790310=113, srv303328507=244, srv1869166689=171, srv781623755=341, srv40741117=264, srv1958265988=190, srv592380483=303, srv483565354=277, srv1531731329=100, srv359746409=253, srv1271131029=54, srv1007512250=2, srv1783696565=158, srv1284150263=57, srv1648846971=118, srv120365207=40, srv263085176=235, srv535080964=290, srv824739010=357, srv744793832=331, srv1073394883=18, srv1113186104=23, srv1370321362=69, srv328204461=249, srv1604342762=109, srv266460489=237, srv313806624=245, srv1473408823=93, srv865692144=366, srv42814401=265, srv104065318=10, srv1599236554=108, srv1476834435=94, srv1673452142=128, srv716892727=325, srv1501773847=98, srv791504502=346, srv367902453=254, srv254349567=232, srv2126102976=218, srv252714068=231, srv916506189=380, srv687320190=318, srv1000433998=0, srv51396503=281, srv648464134=313, srv908419423=379, srv204022732=200, srv1901650254=177, srv200342397=196, srv765841762=335, srv1849125656=167, srv235281774=226, srv2137298641=224, srv517347076=283, srv1687711069=135, srv800105834=347, srv1609917009=112, srv1038797815=9, srv863216619=365, srv921796978=382, srv895924009=376, srv319002955=246, srv611122413=305, srv1942590787=186, srv529333113=288, srv1053973741=14, srv1988512138=194, srv1037112526=8, srv442327402=268, srv2062351281=204, srv1240518778=48, srv471289019=274, srv1857090224=170, srv1543025253=101, srv1915241294=184, srv238420451=228, srv1747796150=145, srv1101668258=21, srv1437034663=88, srv1173449481=35, srv582652595=301, srv1739043021=144, srv1733173130=143, srv465824154=272, srv14463216=91, srv1720161153=140, srv1549403995=102, srv235920151=227, srv1909060246=179, srv527988350=287, srv1801762669=161, srv89501442=375, srv442994824=269, srv1414012241=83, srv165153258=121, srv1766333515=151, srv2063438865=205, srv1071671801=17, srv1638570398=116, srv1035353226=7, srv1856921753=169, srv1887444158=173, srv1897306674=176, srv1255718022=51, srv1260078897=53, srv1372945218=70, srv1163715139=31, srv175471358=146, srv1558656747=104, srv1463869996=92, srv124825865=49, srv1142495625=26, srv1397803774=77, srv1644508836=117, srv1807320536=162, srv1165273546=32, srv1650978005=120, srv1374260725=71, srv2065239646=206, srv1685737274=134, srv878340336=371, srv329463090=250, srv2112675912=213, srv1378293943=74, srv787532288=343, srv1292867420=59, srv519831391=285, srv1002018470=1, srv822141051=356, srv1229740495=45, srv706370370=321, srv255741565=233, srv1177018836=36, srv1223505925=43, srv745532463=332, srv1820836786=163, srv2127145828=220, srv2124524081=216, srv665150476=316, srv2132621880=223, srv2051928856=203, srv1903063797=178, srv881186303=373, srv1758974023=148, srv270549378=239, srv2014789268=198, srv1663469360=123, srv1331983035=65, srv1768940632=153, srv2084732799=210, srv1043044287=12, srv630246195=309, srv86319792=364, srv37305654=256, srv1650394019=119, srv1888093001=174, srv512441512=280, srv813969264=352, srv277288989=241, srv2017714321=199, srv1410469782=81, srv751917673=333, srv1443060804=89, srv1997063872=195, srv404426071=263, srv1443287861=90, srv695697141=320, srv636958174=310, srv1105584096=22, srv583005569=302, srv92523166=384, srv330226906=251, srv1684865692=133, srv381463497=258, srv567942525=297, srv1010403208=3, srv881516937=374, srv140693587=80, srv1872213858=172, srv262210172=234, srv846799674=358, srv851169364=360, srv880017865=372, srv129190288=58, srv401606217=262, srv669535820=317, srv1325384866=64, srv1377673856=73, srv1416276025=85, srv430431276=266, srv81513922=353, srv2044458062=201, srv2118166427=214, srv1665530216=125, srv2045587532=202, srv1824773168=164, srv2071913725=208, srv1295499145=60, srv1780304939=155, srv612277490=306, srv102508625=6, srv1637539828=115, srv820424989=355, srv50966795=279, srv1950402166=188, srv1207208580=42, srv1057648579=16, srv1084295726=20, srv39165764=260, srv959379519=387, srv2066402828=207, srv1556810592=103, srv1232731779=46, srv1606144164=110, srv1487275322=95, srv519310224=284, srv775221203=338, srv1079168923=19, srv1957834842=189, srv866525142=367, srv243907419=229, srv248553307=230, srv344122075=252, srv467461515=273, srv805609280=349, srv1018507425=4, srv1827511993=166, srv1704639485=137, srv855754935=362, srv1057024901=15, srv1116429721=24, srv927375731=385, srv1383836323=76, srv1584407048=107, srv809779157=351, srv1786622589=159, srv869541705=368, srv1123072042=25, srv1726136626=142, srv135800579=67, srv1958676591=191, srv390748718=259, srv907223095=378, srv76871917=336, srv1160170031=29, srv2119727728=215, srv918100507=381, srv1352063642=66, srv1975716907=193} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-17 21:53:14,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-17 21:53:14,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-17 21:53:14,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-17 21:53:14,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-17 21:53:14,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-17 21:53:14,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-17 21:53:14,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-17 21:53:14,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-17 21:53:14,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-17 21:53:14,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-17 21:53:14,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-17 21:53:14,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-17 21:53:14,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-17 21:53:14,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-17 21:53:14,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-17 21:53:14,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-17 21:53:14,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-17 21:53:14,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-17 21:53:14,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-17 21:53:14,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-17 21:53:14,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-17 21:53:14,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-17 21:53:14,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-17 21:53:14,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-17 21:53:14,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-17 21:53:14,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-17 21:53:14,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-17 21:53:14,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-17 21:53:14,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-17 21:53:14,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-17 21:53:14,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-17 21:53:14,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-17 21:53:14,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-17 21:53:14,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-17 21:53:14,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-17 21:53:14,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-17 21:53:14,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-17 21:53:14,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-17 21:53:14,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-17 21:53:14,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-17 21:53:14,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-17 21:53:14,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-17 21:53:14,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-17 21:53:14,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-17 21:53:14,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-17 21:53:14,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-17 21:53:14,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-17 21:53:14,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-17 21:53:14,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-17 21:53:14,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-17 21:53:14,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-17 21:53:14,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-17 21:53:14,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-17 21:53:14,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-17 21:53:14,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-17 21:53:14,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-17 21:53:14,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-17 21:53:14,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-17 21:53:14,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-17 21:53:14,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-17 21:53:14,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-17 21:53:14,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-17 21:53:14,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-17 21:53:14,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-17 21:53:14,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-17 21:53:14,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-17 21:53:14,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-17 21:53:14,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-17 21:53:14,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-17 21:53:14,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-17 21:53:14,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-17 21:53:14,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-17 21:53:14,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-17 21:53:14,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-17 21:53:14,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-17 21:53:14,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-17 21:53:14,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-17 21:53:14,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-17 21:53:14,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-17 21:53:14,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-17 21:53:14,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-17 21:53:14,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-17 21:53:14,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-17 21:53:14,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-17 21:53:14,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-17 21:53:14,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-17 21:53:14,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-17 21:53:14,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-17 21:53:14,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-17 21:53:14,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-17 21:53:14,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-17 21:53:14,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-17 21:53:14,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-17 21:53:14,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-17 21:53:14,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-17 21:53:14,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-17 21:53:14,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-17 21:53:14,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-17 21:53:14,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-17 21:53:14,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-17 21:53:14,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-17 21:53:14,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-17 21:53:14,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-17 21:53:14,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-17 21:53:14,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-17 21:53:14,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-17 21:53:14,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-17 21:53:14,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-17 21:53:14,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-17 21:53:14,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-17 21:53:14,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-17 21:53:14,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-17 21:53:14,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-17 21:53:14,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-17 21:53:14,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-17 21:53:14,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-17 21:53:14,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-17 21:53:14,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-17 21:53:14,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-17 21:53:14,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-17 21:53:14,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-17 21:53:14,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-17 21:53:14,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-17 21:53:14,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-17 21:53:14,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-17 21:53:14,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-17 21:53:14,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-17 21:53:14,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-17 21:53:14,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-17 21:53:14,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-17 21:53:14,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-17 21:53:14,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-17 21:53:14,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-17 21:53:14,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-17 21:53:14,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-17 21:53:14,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-17 21:53:14,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-17 21:53:14,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-17 21:53:14,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-17 21:53:14,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-17 21:53:14,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-17 21:53:14,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-17 21:53:14,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-17 21:53:14,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-17 21:53:14,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-17 21:53:14,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-17 21:53:14,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-17 21:53:14,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-17 21:53:14,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-17 21:53:14,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-17 21:53:14,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-17 21:53:14,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-17 21:53:14,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-17 21:53:14,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-17 21:53:14,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-17 21:53:14,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-17 21:53:14,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-17 21:53:14,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-17 21:53:14,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-17 21:53:14,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-17 21:53:14,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-17 21:53:14,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-17 21:53:14,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-17 21:53:14,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-17 21:53:14,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-17 21:53:14,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-17 21:53:14,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-17 21:53:14,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-17 21:53:14,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-17 21:53:14,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-17 21:53:14,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-17 21:53:14,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-17 21:53:14,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-17 21:53:14,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-17 21:53:14,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-17 21:53:14,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-17 21:53:14,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-17 21:53:14,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-17 21:53:14,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-17 21:53:14,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-17 21:53:14,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-17 21:53:14,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-17 21:53:14,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-17 21:53:14,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-17 21:53:14,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-17 21:53:14,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-17 21:53:14,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-17 21:53:14,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-17 21:53:14,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-17 21:53:14,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-17 21:53:14,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-17 21:53:14,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-17 21:53:14,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-17 21:53:14,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-17 21:53:14,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-17 21:53:14,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-17 21:53:14,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-17 21:53:14,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-17 21:53:14,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-17 21:53:14,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-17 21:53:14,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-17 21:53:14,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-17 21:53:14,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-17 21:53:14,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-17 21:53:14,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-17 21:53:14,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-17 21:53:14,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-17 21:53:14,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-17 21:53:14,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-17 21:53:14,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-17 21:53:14,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-17 21:53:14,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-17 21:53:14,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-17 21:53:14,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-17 21:53:14,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-17 21:53:14,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-17 21:53:14,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-17 21:53:14,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-17 21:53:14,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-17 21:53:14,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-17 21:53:14,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-17 21:53:14,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-17 21:53:14,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-17 21:53:14,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-17 21:53:14,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-17 21:53:14,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-17 21:53:14,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-17 21:53:14,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-17 21:53:14,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-17 21:53:14,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-17 21:53:14,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-17 21:53:14,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-17 21:53:14,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-17 21:53:14,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-17 21:53:14,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-17 21:53:14,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-17 21:53:14,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-17 21:53:14,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-17 21:53:14,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-17 21:53:14,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-17 21:53:14,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-17 21:53:14,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-17 21:53:14,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-17 21:53:14,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-17 21:53:14,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-17 21:53:14,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-17 21:53:14,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-17 21:53:14,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-17 21:53:14,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-17 21:53:14,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-17 21:53:14,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-17 21:53:14,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-17 21:53:14,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-17 21:53:14,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-17 21:53:14,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-17 21:53:14,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-17 21:53:14,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-17 21:53:14,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-17 21:53:14,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-17 21:53:14,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-17 21:53:14,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-17 21:53:14,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-17 21:53:14,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-17 21:53:14,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-17 21:53:14,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-17 21:53:14,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-17 21:53:14,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-17 21:53:14,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-17 21:53:14,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-17 21:53:14,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-17 21:53:14,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-17 21:53:14,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-17 21:53:14,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-17 21:53:14,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-17 21:53:14,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-17 21:53:14,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-17 21:53:14,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-17 21:53:14,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-17 21:53:14,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-17 21:53:14,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-17 21:53:14,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-17 21:53:14,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-17 21:53:14,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-17 21:53:14,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-17 21:53:14,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-17 21:53:14,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-17 21:53:14,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-17 21:53:14,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-17 21:53:14,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-17 21:53:14,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-17 21:53:14,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-17 21:53:14,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-17 21:53:14,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-17 21:53:14,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-17 21:53:14,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-17 21:53:14,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-17 21:53:14,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-17 21:53:14,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-17 21:53:14,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-17 21:53:14,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-17 21:53:14,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-17 21:53:14,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-17 21:53:14,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-17 21:53:14,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-17 21:53:14,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-17 21:53:14,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-17 21:53:14,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-17 21:53:14,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-17 21:53:14,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-17 21:53:14,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-17 21:53:14,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-17 21:53:14,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-17 21:53:14,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-17 21:53:14,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-17 21:53:14,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-17 21:53:14,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-17 21:53:14,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-17 21:53:14,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-17 21:53:14,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-17 21:53:14,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-17 21:53:14,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-17 21:53:14,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-17 21:53:14,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-17 21:53:14,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-17 21:53:14,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-17 21:53:14,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-17 21:53:14,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-17 21:53:14,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-17 21:53:14,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-17 21:53:14,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-17 21:53:14,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-17 21:53:14,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-17 21:53:14,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-17 21:53:14,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-17 21:53:14,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-17 21:53:14,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-17 21:53:14,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-17 21:53:14,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-17 21:53:14,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-17 21:53:14,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-17 21:53:14,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-17 21:53:14,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-17 21:53:14,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-17 21:53:14,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-17 21:53:14,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-17 21:53:14,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-17 21:53:14,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-17 21:53:14,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-17 21:53:14,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-17 21:53:14,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-17 21:53:14,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-17 21:53:14,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-17 21:53:14,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-17 21:53:14,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-17 21:53:14,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-17 21:53:14,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-17 21:53:14,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-17 21:53:14,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-17 21:53:14,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-17 21:53:14,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-17 21:53:14,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-17 21:53:14,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-17 21:53:14,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-17 21:53:14,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-17 21:53:14,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-17 21:53:14,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-17 21:53:14,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-17 21:53:14,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-17 21:53:14,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-17 21:53:14,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-17 21:53:14,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-17 21:53:14,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-17 21:53:14,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-17 21:53:14,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-17 21:53:14,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-17 21:53:14,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-17 21:53:14,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-17 21:53:14,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-17 21:53:14,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-17 21:53:14,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-17 21:53:14,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-17 21:53:14,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-17 21:53:14,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,906 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table41) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,906 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table42
2023-07-17 21:53:14,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv871358531=369, srv64697211=312, srv653261481=314, srv1778141916=154, srv716510755=323, srv372169288=255, srv568235512=298, srv710229516=322, srv537137712=293, srv1682791519=131, srv642353994=311, srv1046656068=13, srv993792848=391, srv1202667070=39, srv99567927=392, srv1607947050=111, srv1677371877=129, srv1763526149=150, srv1763378353=149, srv531263272=289, srv448398842=270, srv802808934=348, srv77960001=340, srv453521623=271, srv162773041=114, srv563606057=295, srv1659238910=122, srv1279307656=55, srv1914255334=183, srv1296605582=61, srv2131597846=222, srv1375359355=72, srv1405269336=79, srv175680261=147, srv282211488=242, srv1412891098=82, srv375712549=257, srv191234370=182, srv1574132168=106, srv1853511149=168, srv617306884=307, srv268601623=238, srv1400099806=78, srv477381292=275, srv1279442050=56, srv535853198=292, srv1767480590=152, srv2100700333=211, srv1187847151=37, srv791064637=345, srv74478935=330, srv1206084762=41, srv1497856295=97, srv897884865=377, srv398014971=261, srv786136704=342, srv1429879791=86, srv1201763981=38, srv1415213844=84, srv302220908=243, srv156683359=105, srv1974497084=192, srv535358845=291, srv627763604=308, srv732106437=326, srv1679724304=130, srv576770232=299, srv478480013=276, srv1237250370=47, srv1169018295=34, srv32320833=248, srv594880186=304, srv216306370=225, srv656484240=315, srv818754908=354, srv1321058011=63, srv1256345927=52, srv1670847243=126, srv1515243164=99, srv1781378955=156, srv508388209=278, srv1910886192=180, srv1718898730=139, srv772274482=337, srv1433624807=87, srv848605385=359, srv2107957639=212, srv270591905=240, srv2126706298=219, srv2080681743=209, srv1683990934=132, srv11526364=28, srv761020484=334, srv1720507603=141, srv266276730=236, srv935213051=386, srv923440665=383, srv1911104834=181, srv1944131651=187, srv1162841146=30, srv1921230216=185, srv319459319=247, srv1168022226=33, srv57689659=300, srv716533901=324, srv1255156178=50, srv441379967=267, srv806979625=350, srv788255577=344, srv976533744=389, srv1317853355=62, srv1491073587=96, srv777865249=339, srv2130226580=221, srv873230355=370, srv971370780=388, srv2008207413=197, srv989150800=390, srv737980208=328, srv862088563=363, srv1716783669=138, srv1801293056=160, srv1363984373=68, srv515711115=282, srv1378945327=75, srv17002515=136, srv853498273=361, srv1825292480=165, srv2124576425=217, srv1889349340=175, srv527691188=286, srv1226737728=44, srv1781498156=157, srv104267960=11, srv1663644309=124, srv1672213768=127, srv740402944=329, srv555807163=294, srv566277037=296, srv734882045=327, srv1143683685=27, srv1021400966=5, srv694407347=319, srv1626790310=113, srv303328507=244, srv1869166689=171, srv781623755=341, srv40741117=264, srv1958265988=190, srv592380483=303, srv483565354=277, srv1531731329=100, srv359746409=253, srv1271131029=54, srv1007512250=2, srv1783696565=158, srv1284150263=57, srv1648846971=118, srv120365207=40, srv263085176=235, srv535080964=290, srv824739010=357, srv744793832=331, srv1073394883=18, srv1113186104=23, srv1370321362=69, srv328204461=249, srv1604342762=109, srv266460489=237, srv313806624=245, srv1473408823=93, srv865692144=366, srv42814401=265, srv104065318=10, srv1599236554=108, srv1476834435=94, srv1673452142=128, srv716892727=325, srv1501773847=98, srv791504502=346, srv367902453=254, srv254349567=232, srv2126102976=218, srv252714068=231, srv916506189=380, srv687320190=318, srv1000433998=0, srv51396503=281, srv648464134=313, srv908419423=379, srv204022732=200, srv1901650254=177, srv200342397=196, srv765841762=335, srv1849125656=167, srv235281774=226, srv2137298641=224, srv517347076=283, srv1687711069=135, srv800105834=347, srv1609917009=112, srv1038797815=9, srv863216619=365, srv921796978=382, srv895924009=376, srv319002955=246, srv611122413=305, srv1942590787=186, srv529333113=288, srv1053973741=14, srv1988512138=194, srv1037112526=8, srv442327402=268, srv2062351281=204, srv1240518778=48, srv471289019=274, srv1857090224=170, srv1543025253=101, srv1915241294=184, srv238420451=228, srv1747796150=145, srv1101668258=21, srv1437034663=88, srv1173449481=35, srv582652595=301, srv1739043021=144, srv1733173130=143, srv465824154=272, srv14463216=91, srv1720161153=140, srv1549403995=102, srv235920151=227, srv1909060246=179, srv527988350=287, srv1801762669=161, srv89501442=375, srv442994824=269, srv1414012241=83, srv165153258=121, srv1766333515=151, srv2063438865=205, srv1071671801=17, srv1638570398=116, srv1035353226=7, srv1856921753=169, srv1887444158=173, srv1897306674=176, srv1255718022=51, srv1260078897=53, srv1372945218=70, srv1163715139=31, srv175471358=146, srv1558656747=104, srv1463869996=92, srv124825865=49, srv1142495625=26, srv1397803774=77, srv1644508836=117, srv1807320536=162, srv1165273546=32, srv1650978005=120, srv1374260725=71, srv2065239646=206, srv1685737274=134, srv878340336=371, srv329463090=250, srv2112675912=213, srv1378293943=74, srv787532288=343, srv1292867420=59, srv519831391=285, srv1002018470=1, srv822141051=356, srv1229740495=45, srv706370370=321, srv255741565=233, srv1177018836=36, srv1223505925=43, srv745532463=332, srv1820836786=163, srv2127145828=220, srv2124524081=216, srv665150476=316, srv2132621880=223, srv2051928856=203, srv1903063797=178, srv881186303=373, srv1758974023=148, srv270549378=239, srv2014789268=198, srv1663469360=123, srv1331983035=65, srv1768940632=153, srv2084732799=210, srv1043044287=12, srv630246195=309, srv86319792=364, srv37305654=256, srv1650394019=119, srv1888093001=174, srv512441512=280, srv813969264=352, srv277288989=241, srv2017714321=199, srv1410469782=81, srv751917673=333, srv1443060804=89, srv1997063872=195, srv404426071=263, srv1443287861=90, srv695697141=320, srv636958174=310, srv1105584096=22, srv583005569=302, srv92523166=384, srv330226906=251, srv1684865692=133, srv381463497=258, srv567942525=297, srv1010403208=3, srv881516937=374, srv140693587=80, srv1872213858=172, srv262210172=234, srv846799674=358, srv851169364=360, srv880017865=372, srv129190288=58, srv401606217=262, srv669535820=317, srv1325384866=64, srv1377673856=73, srv1416276025=85, srv430431276=266, srv81513922=353, srv2044458062=201, srv2118166427=214, srv1665530216=125, srv2045587532=202, srv1824773168=164, srv2071913725=208, srv1295499145=60, srv1780304939=155, srv612277490=306, srv102508625=6, srv1637539828=115, srv820424989=355, srv50966795=279, srv1950402166=188, srv1207208580=42, srv1057648579=16, srv1084295726=20, srv39165764=260, srv959379519=387, srv2066402828=207, srv1556810592=103, srv1232731779=46, srv1606144164=110, srv1487275322=95, srv519310224=284, srv775221203=338, srv1079168923=19, srv1957834842=189, srv866525142=367, srv243907419=229, srv248553307=230, srv344122075=252, srv467461515=273, srv805609280=349, srv1018507425=4, srv1827511993=166, srv1704639485=137, srv855754935=362, srv1057024901=15, srv1116429721=24, srv927375731=385, srv1383836323=76, srv1584407048=107, srv809779157=351, srv1786622589=159, srv869541705=368, srv1123072042=25, srv1726136626=142, srv135800579=67, srv1958676591=191, srv390748718=259, srv907223095=378, srv76871917=336, srv1160170031=29, srv2119727728=215, srv918100507=381, srv1352063642=66, srv1975716907=193} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-17 21:53:14,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-17 21:53:14,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-17 21:53:14,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-17 21:53:14,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-17 21:53:14,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-17 21:53:14,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-17 21:53:14,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-17 21:53:14,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-17 21:53:14,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-17 21:53:14,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-17 21:53:14,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-17 21:53:14,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-17 21:53:14,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-17 21:53:14,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-17 21:53:14,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-17 21:53:14,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-17 21:53:14,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-17 21:53:14,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-17 21:53:14,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-17 21:53:14,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-17 21:53:14,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-17 21:53:14,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-17 21:53:14,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-17 21:53:14,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-17 21:53:14,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-17 21:53:14,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-17 21:53:14,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-17 21:53:14,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-17 21:53:14,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-17 21:53:14,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-17 21:53:14,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-17 21:53:14,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-17 21:53:14,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-17 21:53:14,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-17 21:53:14,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-17 21:53:14,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-17 21:53:14,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-17 21:53:14,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-17 21:53:14,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-17 21:53:14,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-17 21:53:14,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-17 21:53:14,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-17 21:53:14,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-17 21:53:14,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-17 21:53:14,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-17 21:53:14,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-17 21:53:14,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-17 21:53:14,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-17 21:53:14,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-17 21:53:14,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-17 21:53:14,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-17 21:53:14,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-17 21:53:14,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-17 21:53:14,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-17 21:53:14,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-17 21:53:14,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-17 21:53:14,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-17 21:53:14,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-17 21:53:14,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-17 21:53:14,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-17 21:53:14,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-17 21:53:14,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-17 21:53:14,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-17 21:53:14,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-17 21:53:14,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-17 21:53:14,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-17 21:53:14,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-17 21:53:14,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-17 21:53:14,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-17 21:53:14,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-17 21:53:14,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-17 21:53:14,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-17 21:53:14,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-17 21:53:14,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-17 21:53:14,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-17 21:53:14,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-17 21:53:14,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-17 21:53:14,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-17 21:53:14,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-17 21:53:14,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-17 21:53:14,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-17 21:53:14,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-17 21:53:14,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-17 21:53:14,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-17 21:53:14,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-17 21:53:14,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-17 21:53:14,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-17 21:53:14,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-17 21:53:14,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-17 21:53:14,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-17 21:53:14,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-17 21:53:14,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-17 21:53:14,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-17 21:53:14,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-17 21:53:14,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-17 21:53:14,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-17 21:53:14,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-17 21:53:14,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-17 21:53:14,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-17 21:53:14,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-17 21:53:14,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-17 21:53:14,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-17 21:53:14,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-17 21:53:14,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-17 21:53:14,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-17 21:53:14,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-17 21:53:14,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-17 21:53:14,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-17 21:53:14,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-17 21:53:14,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-17 21:53:14,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-17 21:53:14,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-17 21:53:14,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-17 21:53:14,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-17 21:53:14,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-17 21:53:14,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-17 21:53:14,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-17 21:53:14,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-17 21:53:14,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-17 21:53:14,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-17 21:53:14,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-17 21:53:14,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-17 21:53:14,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-17 21:53:14,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-17 21:53:14,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-17 21:53:14,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-17 21:53:14,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-17 21:53:14,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-17 21:53:14,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-17 21:53:14,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-17 21:53:14,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-17 21:53:14,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-17 21:53:14,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-17 21:53:14,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-17 21:53:14,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-17 21:53:14,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-17 21:53:14,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-17 21:53:14,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-17 21:53:14,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-17 21:53:14,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-17 21:53:14,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-17 21:53:14,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-17 21:53:14,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-17 21:53:14,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-17 21:53:14,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-17 21:53:14,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-17 21:53:14,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-17 21:53:14,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-17 21:53:14,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-17 21:53:14,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-17 21:53:14,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-17 21:53:14,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-17 21:53:14,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-17 21:53:14,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-17 21:53:14,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-17 21:53:14,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-17 21:53:14,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-17 21:53:14,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-17 21:53:14,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-17 21:53:14,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-17 21:53:14,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-17 21:53:14,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-17 21:53:14,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-17 21:53:14,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-17 21:53:14,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-17 21:53:14,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-17 21:53:14,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-17 21:53:14,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-17 21:53:14,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-17 21:53:14,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-17 21:53:14,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-17 21:53:14,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-17 21:53:14,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-17 21:53:14,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-17 21:53:14,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-17 21:53:14,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-17 21:53:14,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-17 21:53:14,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-17 21:53:14,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-17 21:53:14,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-17 21:53:14,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-17 21:53:14,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-17 21:53:14,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-17 21:53:14,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-17 21:53:14,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-17 21:53:14,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-17 21:53:14,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-17 21:53:14,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-17 21:53:14,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-17 21:53:14,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-17 21:53:14,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-17 21:53:14,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-17 21:53:14,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-17 21:53:14,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-17 21:53:14,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-17 21:53:14,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-17 21:53:14,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-17 21:53:14,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-17 21:53:14,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-17 21:53:14,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-17 21:53:14,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-17 21:53:14,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-17 21:53:14,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-17 21:53:14,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-17 21:53:14,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-17 21:53:14,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-17 21:53:14,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-17 21:53:14,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-17 21:53:14,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-17 21:53:14,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-17 21:53:14,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-17 21:53:14,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-17 21:53:14,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-17 21:53:14,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-17 21:53:14,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-17 21:53:14,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-17 21:53:14,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-17 21:53:14,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-17 21:53:14,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-17 21:53:14,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-17 21:53:14,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-17 21:53:14,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-17 21:53:14,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-17 21:53:14,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-17 21:53:14,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-17 21:53:14,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-17 21:53:14,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-17 21:53:14,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-17 21:53:14,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-17 21:53:14,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-17 21:53:14,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-17 21:53:14,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-17 21:53:14,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-17 21:53:14,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-17 21:53:14,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-17 21:53:14,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-17 21:53:14,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-17 21:53:14,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-17 21:53:14,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-17 21:53:14,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-17 21:53:14,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-17 21:53:14,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-17 21:53:14,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-17 21:53:14,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-17 21:53:14,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-17 21:53:14,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-17 21:53:14,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-17 21:53:14,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-17 21:53:14,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-17 21:53:14,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-17 21:53:14,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-17 21:53:14,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-17 21:53:14,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-17 21:53:14,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-17 21:53:14,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-17 21:53:14,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-17 21:53:14,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-17 21:53:14,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-17 21:53:14,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-17 21:53:14,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-17 21:53:14,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-17 21:53:14,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-17 21:53:14,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-17 21:53:14,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-17 21:53:14,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-17 21:53:14,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-17 21:53:14,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-17 21:53:14,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-17 21:53:14,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-17 21:53:14,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-17 21:53:14,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-17 21:53:14,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-17 21:53:14,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-17 21:53:14,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-17 21:53:14,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-17 21:53:14,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-17 21:53:14,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-17 21:53:14,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-17 21:53:14,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-17 21:53:14,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-17 21:53:14,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-17 21:53:14,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-17 21:53:14,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-17 21:53:14,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-17 21:53:14,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-17 21:53:14,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-17 21:53:14,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-17 21:53:14,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-17 21:53:14,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-17 21:53:14,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-17 21:53:14,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-17 21:53:14,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-17 21:53:14,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-17 21:53:14,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-17 21:53:14,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-17 21:53:14,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-17 21:53:14,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-17 21:53:14,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-17 21:53:14,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-17 21:53:14,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-17 21:53:14,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-17 21:53:14,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-17 21:53:14,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-17 21:53:14,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-17 21:53:14,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-17 21:53:14,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-17 21:53:14,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-17 21:53:14,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-17 21:53:14,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-17 21:53:14,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-17 21:53:14,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-17 21:53:14,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-17 21:53:14,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-17 21:53:14,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-17 21:53:14,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-17 21:53:14,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-17 21:53:14,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-17 21:53:14,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-17 21:53:14,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-17 21:53:14,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-17 21:53:14,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-17 21:53:14,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-17 21:53:14,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-17 21:53:14,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-17 21:53:14,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-17 21:53:14,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-17 21:53:14,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-17 21:53:14,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-17 21:53:14,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-17 21:53:14,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-17 21:53:14,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-17 21:53:14,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-17 21:53:14,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-17 21:53:14,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-17 21:53:14,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-17 21:53:14,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-17 21:53:14,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-17 21:53:14,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-17 21:53:14,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-17 21:53:14,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-17 21:53:14,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-17 21:53:14,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-17 21:53:14,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-17 21:53:14,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-17 21:53:14,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-17 21:53:14,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-17 21:53:14,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-17 21:53:14,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-17 21:53:14,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-17 21:53:14,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-17 21:53:14,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-17 21:53:14,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-17 21:53:14,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-17 21:53:14,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-17 21:53:14,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-17 21:53:14,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-17 21:53:14,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-17 21:53:14,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-17 21:53:14,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-17 21:53:14,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-17 21:53:14,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-17 21:53:14,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-17 21:53:14,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-17 21:53:14,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-17 21:53:14,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-17 21:53:14,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-17 21:53:14,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-17 21:53:14,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-17 21:53:14,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-17 21:53:14,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-17 21:53:14,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-17 21:53:14,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-17 21:53:14,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-17 21:53:14,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-17 21:53:14,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-17 21:53:14,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-17 21:53:14,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-17 21:53:14,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-17 21:53:14,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-17 21:53:14,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-17 21:53:14,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-17 21:53:14,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-17 21:53:14,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,921 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table42) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,921 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table43
2023-07-17 21:53:14,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv871358531=369, srv64697211=312, srv653261481=314, srv1778141916=154, srv716510755=323, srv372169288=255, srv568235512=298, srv710229516=322, srv537137712=293, srv1682791519=131, srv642353994=311, srv1046656068=13, srv993792848=391, srv1202667070=39, srv99567927=392, srv1607947050=111, srv1677371877=129, srv1763526149=150, srv1763378353=149, srv531263272=289, srv448398842=270, srv802808934=348, srv77960001=340, srv453521623=271, srv162773041=114, srv563606057=295, srv1659238910=122, srv1279307656=55, srv1914255334=183, srv1296605582=61, srv2131597846=222, srv1375359355=72, srv1405269336=79, srv175680261=147, srv282211488=242, srv1412891098=82, srv375712549=257, srv191234370=182, srv1574132168=106, srv1853511149=168, srv617306884=307, srv268601623=238, srv1400099806=78, srv477381292=275, srv1279442050=56, srv535853198=292, srv1767480590=152, srv2100700333=211, srv1187847151=37, srv791064637=345, srv74478935=330, srv1206084762=41, srv1497856295=97, srv897884865=377, srv398014971=261, srv786136704=342, srv1429879791=86, srv1201763981=38, srv1415213844=84, srv302220908=243, srv156683359=105, srv1974497084=192, srv535358845=291, srv627763604=308, srv732106437=326, srv1679724304=130, srv576770232=299, srv478480013=276, srv1237250370=47, srv1169018295=34, srv32320833=248, srv594880186=304, srv216306370=225, srv656484240=315, srv818754908=354, srv1321058011=63, srv1256345927=52, srv1670847243=126, srv1515243164=99, srv1781378955=156, srv508388209=278, srv1910886192=180, srv1718898730=139, srv772274482=337, srv1433624807=87, srv848605385=359, srv2107957639=212, srv270591905=240, srv2126706298=219, srv2080681743=209, srv1683990934=132, srv11526364=28, srv761020484=334, srv1720507603=141, srv266276730=236, srv935213051=386, srv923440665=383, srv1911104834=181, srv1944131651=187, srv1162841146=30, srv1921230216=185, srv319459319=247, srv1168022226=33, srv57689659=300, srv716533901=324, srv1255156178=50, srv441379967=267, srv806979625=350, srv788255577=344, srv976533744=389, srv1317853355=62, srv1491073587=96, srv777865249=339, srv2130226580=221, srv873230355=370, srv971370780=388, srv2008207413=197, srv989150800=390, srv737980208=328, srv862088563=363, srv1716783669=138, srv1801293056=160, srv1363984373=68, srv515711115=282, srv1378945327=75, srv17002515=136, srv853498273=361, srv1825292480=165, srv2124576425=217, srv1889349340=175, srv527691188=286, srv1226737728=44, srv1781498156=157, srv104267960=11, srv1663644309=124, srv1672213768=127, srv740402944=329, srv555807163=294, srv566277037=296, srv734882045=327, srv1143683685=27, srv1021400966=5, srv694407347=319, srv1626790310=113, srv303328507=244, srv1869166689=171, srv781623755=341, srv40741117=264, srv1958265988=190, srv592380483=303, srv483565354=277, srv1531731329=100, srv359746409=253, srv1271131029=54, srv1007512250=2, srv1783696565=158, srv1284150263=57, srv1648846971=118, srv120365207=40, srv263085176=235, srv535080964=290, srv824739010=357, srv744793832=331, srv1073394883=18, srv1113186104=23, srv1370321362=69, srv328204461=249, srv1604342762=109, srv266460489=237, srv313806624=245, srv1473408823=93, srv865692144=366, srv42814401=265, srv104065318=10, srv1599236554=108, srv1476834435=94, srv1673452142=128, srv716892727=325, srv1501773847=98, srv791504502=346, srv367902453=254, srv254349567=232, srv2126102976=218, srv252714068=231, srv916506189=380, srv687320190=318, srv1000433998=0, srv51396503=281, srv648464134=313, srv908419423=379, srv204022732=200, srv1901650254=177, srv200342397=196, srv765841762=335, srv1849125656=167, srv235281774=226, srv2137298641=224, srv517347076=283, srv1687711069=135, srv800105834=347, srv1609917009=112, srv1038797815=9, srv863216619=365, srv921796978=382, srv895924009=376, srv319002955=246, srv611122413=305, srv1942590787=186, srv529333113=288, srv1053973741=14, srv1988512138=194, srv1037112526=8, srv442327402=268, srv2062351281=204, srv1240518778=48, srv471289019=274, srv1857090224=170, srv1543025253=101, srv1915241294=184, srv238420451=228, srv1747796150=145, srv1101668258=21, srv1437034663=88, srv1173449481=35, srv582652595=301, srv1739043021=144, srv1733173130=143, srv465824154=272, srv14463216=91, srv1720161153=140, srv1549403995=102, srv235920151=227, srv1909060246=179, srv527988350=287, srv1801762669=161, srv89501442=375, srv442994824=269, srv1414012241=83, srv165153258=121, srv1766333515=151, srv2063438865=205, srv1071671801=17, srv1638570398=116, srv1035353226=7, srv1856921753=169, srv1887444158=173, srv1897306674=176, srv1255718022=51, srv1260078897=53, srv1372945218=70, srv1163715139=31, srv175471358=146, srv1558656747=104, srv1463869996=92, srv124825865=49, srv1142495625=26, srv1397803774=77, srv1644508836=117, srv1807320536=162, srv1165273546=32, srv1650978005=120, srv1374260725=71, srv2065239646=206, srv1685737274=134, srv878340336=371, srv329463090=250, srv2112675912=213, srv1378293943=74, srv787532288=343, srv1292867420=59, srv519831391=285, srv1002018470=1, srv822141051=356, srv1229740495=45, srv706370370=321, srv255741565=233, srv1177018836=36, srv1223505925=43, srv745532463=332, srv1820836786=163, srv2127145828=220, srv2124524081=216, srv665150476=316, srv2132621880=223, srv2051928856=203, srv1903063797=178, srv881186303=373, srv1758974023=148, srv270549378=239, srv2014789268=198, srv1663469360=123, srv1331983035=65, srv1768940632=153, srv2084732799=210, srv1043044287=12, srv630246195=309, srv86319792=364, srv37305654=256, srv1650394019=119, srv1888093001=174, srv512441512=280, srv813969264=352, srv277288989=241, srv2017714321=199, srv1410469782=81, srv751917673=333, srv1443060804=89, srv1997063872=195, srv404426071=263, srv1443287861=90, srv695697141=320, srv636958174=310, srv1105584096=22, srv583005569=302, srv92523166=384, srv330226906=251, srv1684865692=133, srv381463497=258, srv567942525=297, srv1010403208=3, srv881516937=374, srv140693587=80, srv1872213858=172, srv262210172=234, srv846799674=358, srv851169364=360, srv880017865=372, srv129190288=58, srv401606217=262, srv669535820=317, srv1325384866=64, srv1377673856=73, srv1416276025=85, srv430431276=266, srv81513922=353, srv2044458062=201, srv2118166427=214, srv1665530216=125, srv2045587532=202, srv1824773168=164, srv2071913725=208, srv1295499145=60, srv1780304939=155, srv612277490=306, srv102508625=6, srv1637539828=115, srv820424989=355, srv50966795=279, srv1950402166=188, srv1207208580=42, srv1057648579=16, srv1084295726=20, srv39165764=260, srv959379519=387, srv2066402828=207, srv1556810592=103, srv1232731779=46, srv1606144164=110, srv1487275322=95, srv519310224=284, srv775221203=338, srv1079168923=19, srv1957834842=189, srv866525142=367, srv243907419=229, srv248553307=230, srv344122075=252, srv467461515=273, srv805609280=349, srv1018507425=4, srv1827511993=166, srv1704639485=137, srv855754935=362, srv1057024901=15, srv1116429721=24, srv927375731=385, srv1383836323=76, srv1584407048=107, srv809779157=351, srv1786622589=159, srv869541705=368, srv1123072042=25, srv1726136626=142, srv135800579=67, srv1958676591=191, srv390748718=259, srv907223095=378, srv76871917=336, srv1160170031=29, srv2119727728=215, srv918100507=381, srv1352063642=66, srv1975716907=193} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-17 21:53:14,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-17 21:53:14,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-17 21:53:14,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-17 21:53:14,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-17 21:53:14,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-17 21:53:14,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-17 21:53:14,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-17 21:53:14,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-17 21:53:14,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-17 21:53:14,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-17 21:53:14,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-17 21:53:14,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-17 21:53:14,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-17 21:53:14,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-17 21:53:14,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-17 21:53:14,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-17 21:53:14,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-17 21:53:14,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-17 21:53:14,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-17 21:53:14,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-17 21:53:14,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-17 21:53:14,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-17 21:53:14,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-17 21:53:14,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-17 21:53:14,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-17 21:53:14,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-17 21:53:14,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-17 21:53:14,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-17 21:53:14,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-17 21:53:14,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-17 21:53:14,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-17 21:53:14,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-17 21:53:14,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-17 21:53:14,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-17 21:53:14,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-17 21:53:14,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-17 21:53:14,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-17 21:53:14,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-17 21:53:14,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-17 21:53:14,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-17 21:53:14,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-17 21:53:14,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-17 21:53:14,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-17 21:53:14,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-17 21:53:14,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-17 21:53:14,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-17 21:53:14,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-17 21:53:14,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-17 21:53:14,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-17 21:53:14,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-17 21:53:14,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-17 21:53:14,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-17 21:53:14,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-17 21:53:14,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-17 21:53:14,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-17 21:53:14,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-17 21:53:14,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-17 21:53:14,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-17 21:53:14,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-17 21:53:14,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-17 21:53:14,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-17 21:53:14,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-17 21:53:14,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-17 21:53:14,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-17 21:53:14,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-17 21:53:14,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-17 21:53:14,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-17 21:53:14,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-17 21:53:14,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-17 21:53:14,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-17 21:53:14,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-17 21:53:14,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-17 21:53:14,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-17 21:53:14,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-17 21:53:14,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-17 21:53:14,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-17 21:53:14,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-17 21:53:14,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-17 21:53:14,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-17 21:53:14,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-17 21:53:14,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-17 21:53:14,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-17 21:53:14,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-17 21:53:14,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-17 21:53:14,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-17 21:53:14,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-17 21:53:14,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-17 21:53:14,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-17 21:53:14,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-17 21:53:14,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-17 21:53:14,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-17 21:53:14,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-17 21:53:14,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-17 21:53:14,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-17 21:53:14,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-17 21:53:14,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-17 21:53:14,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-17 21:53:14,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-17 21:53:14,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-17 21:53:14,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-17 21:53:14,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-17 21:53:14,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-17 21:53:14,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-17 21:53:14,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-17 21:53:14,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-17 21:53:14,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-17 21:53:14,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-17 21:53:14,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-17 21:53:14,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-17 21:53:14,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-17 21:53:14,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-17 21:53:14,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-17 21:53:14,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-17 21:53:14,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-17 21:53:14,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-17 21:53:14,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-17 21:53:14,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-17 21:53:14,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-17 21:53:14,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-17 21:53:14,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-17 21:53:14,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-17 21:53:14,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-17 21:53:14,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-17 21:53:14,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-17 21:53:14,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-17 21:53:14,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-17 21:53:14,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-17 21:53:14,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-17 21:53:14,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-17 21:53:14,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-17 21:53:14,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-17 21:53:14,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-17 21:53:14,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-17 21:53:14,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-17 21:53:14,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-17 21:53:14,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-17 21:53:14,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-17 21:53:14,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-17 21:53:14,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-17 21:53:14,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-17 21:53:14,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-17 21:53:14,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-17 21:53:14,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-17 21:53:14,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-17 21:53:14,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-17 21:53:14,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-17 21:53:14,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-17 21:53:14,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-17 21:53:14,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-17 21:53:14,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-17 21:53:14,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-17 21:53:14,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-17 21:53:14,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-17 21:53:14,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-17 21:53:14,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-17 21:53:14,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-17 21:53:14,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-17 21:53:14,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-17 21:53:14,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-17 21:53:14,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-17 21:53:14,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-17 21:53:14,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-17 21:53:14,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-17 21:53:14,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-17 21:53:14,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-17 21:53:14,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-17 21:53:14,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-17 21:53:14,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-17 21:53:14,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-17 21:53:14,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-17 21:53:14,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-17 21:53:14,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-17 21:53:14,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-17 21:53:14,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-17 21:53:14,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-17 21:53:14,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-17 21:53:14,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-17 21:53:14,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-17 21:53:14,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-17 21:53:14,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-17 21:53:14,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-17 21:53:14,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-17 21:53:14,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-17 21:53:14,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-17 21:53:14,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-17 21:53:14,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-17 21:53:14,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-17 21:53:14,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-17 21:53:14,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-17 21:53:14,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-17 21:53:14,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-17 21:53:14,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-17 21:53:14,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-17 21:53:14,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-17 21:53:14,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-17 21:53:14,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-17 21:53:14,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-17 21:53:14,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-17 21:53:14,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-17 21:53:14,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-17 21:53:14,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-17 21:53:14,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-17 21:53:14,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-17 21:53:14,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-17 21:53:14,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-17 21:53:14,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-17 21:53:14,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-17 21:53:14,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-17 21:53:14,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-17 21:53:14,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-17 21:53:14,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-17 21:53:14,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-17 21:53:14,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-17 21:53:14,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-17 21:53:14,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-17 21:53:14,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-17 21:53:14,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-17 21:53:14,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-17 21:53:14,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-17 21:53:14,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-17 21:53:14,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-17 21:53:14,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-17 21:53:14,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-17 21:53:14,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-17 21:53:14,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-17 21:53:14,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-17 21:53:14,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-17 21:53:14,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-17 21:53:14,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-17 21:53:14,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-17 21:53:14,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-17 21:53:14,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-17 21:53:14,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-17 21:53:14,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-17 21:53:14,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-17 21:53:14,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-17 21:53:14,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-17 21:53:14,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-17 21:53:14,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-17 21:53:14,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-17 21:53:14,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-17 21:53:14,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-17 21:53:14,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-17 21:53:14,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-17 21:53:14,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-17 21:53:14,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-17 21:53:14,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-17 21:53:14,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-17 21:53:14,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-17 21:53:14,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-17 21:53:14,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-17 21:53:14,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-17 21:53:14,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-17 21:53:14,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-17 21:53:14,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-17 21:53:14,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-17 21:53:14,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-17 21:53:14,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-17 21:53:14,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-17 21:53:14,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-17 21:53:14,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-17 21:53:14,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-17 21:53:14,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-17 21:53:14,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-17 21:53:14,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-17 21:53:14,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-17 21:53:14,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-17 21:53:14,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-17 21:53:14,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-17 21:53:14,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-17 21:53:14,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-17 21:53:14,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-17 21:53:14,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-17 21:53:14,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-17 21:53:14,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-17 21:53:14,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-17 21:53:14,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-17 21:53:14,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-17 21:53:14,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-17 21:53:14,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-17 21:53:14,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-17 21:53:14,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-17 21:53:14,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-17 21:53:14,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-17 21:53:14,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-17 21:53:14,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-17 21:53:14,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-17 21:53:14,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-17 21:53:14,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-17 21:53:14,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-17 21:53:14,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-17 21:53:14,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-17 21:53:14,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-17 21:53:14,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-17 21:53:14,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-17 21:53:14,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-17 21:53:14,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-17 21:53:14,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-17 21:53:14,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-17 21:53:14,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-17 21:53:14,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-17 21:53:14,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-17 21:53:14,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-17 21:53:14,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-17 21:53:14,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-17 21:53:14,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-17 21:53:14,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-17 21:53:14,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-17 21:53:14,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-17 21:53:14,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-17 21:53:14,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-17 21:53:14,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-17 21:53:14,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-17 21:53:14,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-17 21:53:14,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-17 21:53:14,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-17 21:53:14,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-17 21:53:14,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-17 21:53:14,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-17 21:53:14,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-17 21:53:14,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-17 21:53:14,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-17 21:53:14,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-17 21:53:14,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-17 21:53:14,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-17 21:53:14,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-17 21:53:14,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-17 21:53:14,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-17 21:53:14,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-17 21:53:14,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-17 21:53:14,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-17 21:53:14,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-17 21:53:14,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-17 21:53:14,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-17 21:53:14,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-17 21:53:14,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-17 21:53:14,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-17 21:53:14,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-17 21:53:14,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-17 21:53:14,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-17 21:53:14,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-17 21:53:14,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-17 21:53:14,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-17 21:53:14,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-17 21:53:14,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-17 21:53:14,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-17 21:53:14,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-17 21:53:14,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-17 21:53:14,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-17 21:53:14,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-17 21:53:14,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-17 21:53:14,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-17 21:53:14,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-17 21:53:14,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-17 21:53:14,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-17 21:53:14,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-17 21:53:14,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-17 21:53:14,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-17 21:53:14,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-17 21:53:14,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-17 21:53:14,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-17 21:53:14,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-17 21:53:14,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-17 21:53:14,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-17 21:53:14,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-17 21:53:14,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-17 21:53:14,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-17 21:53:14,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-17 21:53:14,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-17 21:53:14,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-17 21:53:14,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-17 21:53:14,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-17 21:53:14,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-17 21:53:14,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-17 21:53:14,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-17 21:53:14,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-17 21:53:14,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-17 21:53:14,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-17 21:53:14,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-17 21:53:14,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-17 21:53:14,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-17 21:53:14,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-17 21:53:14,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,936 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table43) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,936 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table44
2023-07-17 21:53:14,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv871358531=369, srv64697211=312, srv653261481=314, srv1778141916=154, srv716510755=323, srv372169288=255, srv568235512=298, srv710229516=322, srv537137712=293, srv1682791519=131, srv642353994=311, srv1046656068=13, srv993792848=391, srv1202667070=39, srv99567927=392, srv1607947050=111, srv1677371877=129, srv1763526149=150, srv1763378353=149, srv531263272=289, srv448398842=270, srv802808934=348, srv77960001=340, srv453521623=271, srv162773041=114, srv563606057=295, srv1659238910=122, srv1279307656=55, srv1914255334=183, srv1296605582=61, srv2131597846=222, srv1375359355=72, srv1405269336=79, srv175680261=147, srv282211488=242, srv1412891098=82, srv375712549=257, srv191234370=182, srv1574132168=106, srv1853511149=168, srv617306884=307, srv268601623=238, srv1400099806=78, srv477381292=275, srv1279442050=56, srv535853198=292, srv1767480590=152, srv2100700333=211, srv1187847151=37, srv791064637=345, srv74478935=330, srv1206084762=41, srv1497856295=97, srv897884865=377, srv398014971=261, srv786136704=342, srv1429879791=86, srv1201763981=38, srv1415213844=84, srv302220908=243, srv156683359=105, srv1974497084=192, srv535358845=291, srv627763604=308, srv732106437=326, srv1679724304=130, srv576770232=299, srv478480013=276, srv1237250370=47, srv1169018295=34, srv32320833=248, srv594880186=304, srv216306370=225, srv656484240=315, srv818754908=354, srv1321058011=63, srv1256345927=52, srv1670847243=126, srv1515243164=99, srv1781378955=156, srv508388209=278, srv1910886192=180, srv1718898730=139, srv772274482=337, srv1433624807=87, srv848605385=359, srv2107957639=212, srv270591905=240, srv2126706298=219, srv2080681743=209, srv1683990934=132, srv11526364=28, srv761020484=334, srv1720507603=141, srv266276730=236, srv935213051=386, srv923440665=383, srv1911104834=181, srv1944131651=187, srv1162841146=30, srv1921230216=185, srv319459319=247, srv1168022226=33, srv57689659=300, srv716533901=324, srv1255156178=50, srv441379967=267, srv806979625=350, srv788255577=344, srv976533744=389, srv1317853355=62, srv1491073587=96, srv777865249=339, srv2130226580=221, srv873230355=370, srv971370780=388, srv2008207413=197, srv989150800=390, srv737980208=328, srv862088563=363, srv1716783669=138, srv1801293056=160, srv1363984373=68, srv515711115=282, srv1378945327=75, srv17002515=136, srv853498273=361, srv1825292480=165, srv2124576425=217, srv1889349340=175, srv527691188=286, srv1226737728=44, srv1781498156=157, srv104267960=11, srv1663644309=124, srv1672213768=127, srv740402944=329, srv555807163=294, srv566277037=296, srv734882045=327, srv1143683685=27, srv1021400966=5, srv694407347=319, srv1626790310=113, srv303328507=244, srv1869166689=171, srv781623755=341, srv40741117=264, srv1958265988=190, srv592380483=303, srv483565354=277, srv1531731329=100, srv359746409=253, srv1271131029=54, srv1007512250=2, srv1783696565=158, srv1284150263=57, srv1648846971=118, srv120365207=40, srv263085176=235, srv535080964=290, srv824739010=357, srv744793832=331, srv1073394883=18, srv1113186104=23, srv1370321362=69, srv328204461=249, srv1604342762=109, srv266460489=237, srv313806624=245, srv1473408823=93, srv865692144=366, srv42814401=265, srv104065318=10, srv1599236554=108, srv1476834435=94, srv1673452142=128, srv716892727=325, srv1501773847=98, srv791504502=346, srv367902453=254, srv254349567=232, srv2126102976=218, srv252714068=231, srv916506189=380, srv687320190=318, srv1000433998=0, srv51396503=281, srv648464134=313, srv908419423=379, srv204022732=200, srv1901650254=177, srv200342397=196, srv765841762=335, srv1849125656=167, srv235281774=226, srv2137298641=224, srv517347076=283, srv1687711069=135, srv800105834=347, srv1609917009=112, srv1038797815=9, srv863216619=365, srv921796978=382, srv895924009=376, srv319002955=246, srv611122413=305, srv1942590787=186, srv529333113=288, srv1053973741=14, srv1988512138=194, srv1037112526=8, srv442327402=268, srv2062351281=204, srv1240518778=48, srv471289019=274, srv1857090224=170, srv1543025253=101, srv1915241294=184, srv238420451=228, srv1747796150=145, srv1101668258=21, srv1437034663=88, srv1173449481=35, srv582652595=301, srv1739043021=144, srv1733173130=143, srv465824154=272, srv14463216=91, srv1720161153=140, srv1549403995=102, srv235920151=227, srv1909060246=179, srv527988350=287, srv1801762669=161, srv89501442=375, srv442994824=269, srv1414012241=83, srv165153258=121, srv1766333515=151, srv2063438865=205, srv1071671801=17, srv1638570398=116, srv1035353226=7, srv1856921753=169, srv1887444158=173, srv1897306674=176, srv1255718022=51, srv1260078897=53, srv1372945218=70, srv1163715139=31, srv175471358=146, srv1558656747=104, srv1463869996=92, srv124825865=49, srv1142495625=26, srv1397803774=77, srv1644508836=117, srv1807320536=162, srv1165273546=32, srv1650978005=120, srv1374260725=71, srv2065239646=206, srv1685737274=134, srv878340336=371, srv329463090=250, srv2112675912=213, srv1378293943=74, srv787532288=343, srv1292867420=59, srv519831391=285, srv1002018470=1, srv822141051=356, srv1229740495=45, srv706370370=321, srv255741565=233, srv1177018836=36, srv1223505925=43, srv745532463=332, srv1820836786=163, srv2127145828=220, srv2124524081=216, srv665150476=316, srv2132621880=223, srv2051928856=203, srv1903063797=178, srv881186303=373, srv1758974023=148, srv270549378=239, srv2014789268=198, srv1663469360=123, srv1331983035=65, srv1768940632=153, srv2084732799=210, srv1043044287=12, srv630246195=309, srv86319792=364, srv37305654=256, srv1650394019=119, srv1888093001=174, srv512441512=280, srv813969264=352, srv277288989=241, srv2017714321=199, srv1410469782=81, srv751917673=333, srv1443060804=89, srv1997063872=195, srv404426071=263, srv1443287861=90, srv695697141=320, srv636958174=310, srv1105584096=22, srv583005569=302, srv92523166=384, srv330226906=251, srv1684865692=133, srv381463497=258, srv567942525=297, srv1010403208=3, srv881516937=374, srv140693587=80, srv1872213858=172, srv262210172=234, srv846799674=358, srv851169364=360, srv880017865=372, srv129190288=58, srv401606217=262, srv669535820=317, srv1325384866=64, srv1377673856=73, srv1416276025=85, srv430431276=266, srv81513922=353, srv2044458062=201, srv2118166427=214, srv1665530216=125, srv2045587532=202, srv1824773168=164, srv2071913725=208, srv1295499145=60, srv1780304939=155, srv612277490=306, srv102508625=6, srv1637539828=115, srv820424989=355, srv50966795=279, srv1950402166=188, srv1207208580=42, srv1057648579=16, srv1084295726=20, srv39165764=260, srv959379519=387, srv2066402828=207, srv1556810592=103, srv1232731779=46, srv1606144164=110, srv1487275322=95, srv519310224=284, srv775221203=338, srv1079168923=19, srv1957834842=189, srv866525142=367, srv243907419=229, srv248553307=230, srv344122075=252, srv467461515=273, srv805609280=349, srv1018507425=4, srv1827511993=166, srv1704639485=137, srv855754935=362, srv1057024901=15, srv1116429721=24, srv927375731=385, srv1383836323=76, srv1584407048=107, srv809779157=351, srv1786622589=159, srv869541705=368, srv1123072042=25, srv1726136626=142, srv135800579=67, srv1958676591=191, srv390748718=259, srv907223095=378, srv76871917=336, srv1160170031=29, srv2119727728=215, srv918100507=381, srv1352063642=66, srv1975716907=193} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-17 21:53:14,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-17 21:53:14,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-17 21:53:14,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-17 21:53:14,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-17 21:53:14,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-17 21:53:14,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-17 21:53:14,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-17 21:53:14,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-17 21:53:14,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-17 21:53:14,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-17 21:53:14,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-17 21:53:14,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-17 21:53:14,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-17 21:53:14,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-17 21:53:14,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-17 21:53:14,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-17 21:53:14,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-17 21:53:14,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-17 21:53:14,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-17 21:53:14,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-17 21:53:14,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-17 21:53:14,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-17 21:53:14,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-17 21:53:14,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-17 21:53:14,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-17 21:53:14,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-17 21:53:14,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-17 21:53:14,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-17 21:53:14,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-17 21:53:14,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-17 21:53:14,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-17 21:53:14,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-17 21:53:14,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-17 21:53:14,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-17 21:53:14,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-17 21:53:14,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-17 21:53:14,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-17 21:53:14,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-17 21:53:14,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-17 21:53:14,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-17 21:53:14,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-17 21:53:14,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-17 21:53:14,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-17 21:53:14,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-17 21:53:14,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-17 21:53:14,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-17 21:53:14,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-17 21:53:14,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-17 21:53:14,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-17 21:53:14,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-17 21:53:14,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-17 21:53:14,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-17 21:53:14,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-17 21:53:14,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-17 21:53:14,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-17 21:53:14,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-17 21:53:14,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-17 21:53:14,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-17 21:53:14,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-17 21:53:14,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-17 21:53:14,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-17 21:53:14,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-17 21:53:14,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-17 21:53:14,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-17 21:53:14,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-17 21:53:14,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-17 21:53:14,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-17 21:53:14,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-17 21:53:14,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-17 21:53:14,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-17 21:53:14,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-17 21:53:14,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-17 21:53:14,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-17 21:53:14,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-17 21:53:14,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-17 21:53:14,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-17 21:53:14,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-17 21:53:14,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-17 21:53:14,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-17 21:53:14,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-17 21:53:14,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-17 21:53:14,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-17 21:53:14,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-17 21:53:14,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-17 21:53:14,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-17 21:53:14,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-17 21:53:14,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-17 21:53:14,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-17 21:53:14,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-17 21:53:14,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-17 21:53:14,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-17 21:53:14,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-17 21:53:14,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-17 21:53:14,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-17 21:53:14,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-17 21:53:14,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-17 21:53:14,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-17 21:53:14,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-17 21:53:14,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-17 21:53:14,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-17 21:53:14,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-17 21:53:14,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-17 21:53:14,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-17 21:53:14,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-17 21:53:14,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-17 21:53:14,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-17 21:53:14,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-17 21:53:14,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-17 21:53:14,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-17 21:53:14,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-17 21:53:14,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-17 21:53:14,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-17 21:53:14,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-17 21:53:14,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-17 21:53:14,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-17 21:53:14,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-17 21:53:14,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-17 21:53:14,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-17 21:53:14,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-17 21:53:14,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-17 21:53:14,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-17 21:53:14,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-17 21:53:14,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-17 21:53:14,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-17 21:53:14,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-17 21:53:14,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-17 21:53:14,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-17 21:53:14,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-17 21:53:14,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-17 21:53:14,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-17 21:53:14,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-17 21:53:14,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-17 21:53:14,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-17 21:53:14,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-17 21:53:14,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-17 21:53:14,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-17 21:53:14,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-17 21:53:14,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-17 21:53:14,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-17 21:53:14,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-17 21:53:14,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-17 21:53:14,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-17 21:53:14,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-17 21:53:14,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-17 21:53:14,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-17 21:53:14,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-17 21:53:14,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-17 21:53:14,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-17 21:53:14,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-17 21:53:14,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-17 21:53:14,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-17 21:53:14,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-17 21:53:14,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-17 21:53:14,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-17 21:53:14,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-17 21:53:14,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-17 21:53:14,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-17 21:53:14,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-17 21:53:14,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-17 21:53:14,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-17 21:53:14,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-17 21:53:14,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-17 21:53:14,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-17 21:53:14,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-17 21:53:14,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-17 21:53:14,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-17 21:53:14,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-17 21:53:14,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-17 21:53:14,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-17 21:53:14,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-17 21:53:14,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-17 21:53:14,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-17 21:53:14,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-17 21:53:14,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-17 21:53:14,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-17 21:53:14,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-17 21:53:14,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-17 21:53:14,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-17 21:53:14,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-17 21:53:14,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-17 21:53:14,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-17 21:53:14,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-17 21:53:14,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-17 21:53:14,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-17 21:53:14,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-17 21:53:14,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-17 21:53:14,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-17 21:53:14,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-17 21:53:14,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-17 21:53:14,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-17 21:53:14,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-17 21:53:14,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-17 21:53:14,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-17 21:53:14,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-17 21:53:14,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-17 21:53:14,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-17 21:53:14,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-17 21:53:14,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-17 21:53:14,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-17 21:53:14,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-17 21:53:14,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-17 21:53:14,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-17 21:53:14,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-17 21:53:14,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-17 21:53:14,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-17 21:53:14,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-17 21:53:14,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-17 21:53:14,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-17 21:53:14,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-17 21:53:14,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-17 21:53:14,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-17 21:53:14,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-17 21:53:14,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-17 21:53:14,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-17 21:53:14,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-17 21:53:14,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-17 21:53:14,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-17 21:53:14,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-17 21:53:14,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-17 21:53:14,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-17 21:53:14,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-17 21:53:14,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-17 21:53:14,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-17 21:53:14,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-17 21:53:14,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-17 21:53:14,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-17 21:53:14,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-17 21:53:14,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-17 21:53:14,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-17 21:53:14,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-17 21:53:14,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-17 21:53:14,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-17 21:53:14,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-17 21:53:14,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-17 21:53:14,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-17 21:53:14,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-17 21:53:14,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-17 21:53:14,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-17 21:53:14,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-17 21:53:14,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-17 21:53:14,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-17 21:53:14,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-17 21:53:14,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-17 21:53:14,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-17 21:53:14,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-17 21:53:14,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-17 21:53:14,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-17 21:53:14,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-17 21:53:14,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-17 21:53:14,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-17 21:53:14,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-17 21:53:14,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-17 21:53:14,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-17 21:53:14,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-17 21:53:14,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-17 21:53:14,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-17 21:53:14,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-17 21:53:14,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-17 21:53:14,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-17 21:53:14,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-17 21:53:14,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-17 21:53:14,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-17 21:53:14,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-17 21:53:14,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-17 21:53:14,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-17 21:53:14,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-17 21:53:14,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-17 21:53:14,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-17 21:53:14,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-17 21:53:14,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-17 21:53:14,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-17 21:53:14,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-17 21:53:14,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-17 21:53:14,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-17 21:53:14,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-17 21:53:14,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-17 21:53:14,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-17 21:53:14,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-17 21:53:14,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-17 21:53:14,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-17 21:53:14,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-17 21:53:14,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-17 21:53:14,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-17 21:53:14,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-17 21:53:14,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-17 21:53:14,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-17 21:53:14,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-17 21:53:14,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-17 21:53:14,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-17 21:53:14,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-17 21:53:14,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-17 21:53:14,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-17 21:53:14,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-17 21:53:14,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-17 21:53:14,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-17 21:53:14,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-17 21:53:14,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-17 21:53:14,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-17 21:53:14,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-17 21:53:14,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-17 21:53:14,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-17 21:53:14,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-17 21:53:14,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-17 21:53:14,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-17 21:53:14,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-17 21:53:14,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-17 21:53:14,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-17 21:53:14,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-17 21:53:14,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-17 21:53:14,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-17 21:53:14,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-17 21:53:14,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-17 21:53:14,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-17 21:53:14,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-17 21:53:14,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-17 21:53:14,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-17 21:53:14,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-17 21:53:14,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-17 21:53:14,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-17 21:53:14,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-17 21:53:14,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-17 21:53:14,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-17 21:53:14,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-17 21:53:14,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-17 21:53:14,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-17 21:53:14,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-17 21:53:14,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-17 21:53:14,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-17 21:53:14,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-17 21:53:14,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-17 21:53:14,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-17 21:53:14,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-17 21:53:14,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-17 21:53:14,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-17 21:53:14,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-17 21:53:14,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-17 21:53:14,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-17 21:53:14,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-17 21:53:14,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-17 21:53:14,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-17 21:53:14,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-17 21:53:14,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-17 21:53:14,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-17 21:53:14,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-17 21:53:14,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-17 21:53:14,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-17 21:53:14,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-17 21:53:14,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-17 21:53:14,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-17 21:53:14,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-17 21:53:14,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-17 21:53:14,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-17 21:53:14,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-17 21:53:14,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-17 21:53:14,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-17 21:53:14,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-17 21:53:14,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-17 21:53:14,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-17 21:53:14,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-17 21:53:14,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-17 21:53:14,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-17 21:53:14,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-17 21:53:14,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-17 21:53:14,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-17 21:53:14,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-17 21:53:14,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-17 21:53:14,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-17 21:53:14,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-17 21:53:14,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-17 21:53:14,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-17 21:53:14,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-17 21:53:14,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-17 21:53:14,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-17 21:53:14,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-17 21:53:14,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-17 21:53:14,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-17 21:53:14,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-17 21:53:14,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-17 21:53:14,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-17 21:53:14,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-17 21:53:14,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-17 21:53:14,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-17 21:53:14,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,959 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table44) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,959 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table45
2023-07-17 21:53:14,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv871358531=369, srv64697211=312, srv653261481=314, srv1778141916=154, srv716510755=323, srv372169288=255, srv568235512=298, srv710229516=322, srv537137712=293, srv1682791519=131, srv642353994=311, srv1046656068=13, srv993792848=391, srv1202667070=39, srv99567927=392, srv1607947050=111, srv1677371877=129, srv1763526149=150, srv1763378353=149, srv531263272=289, srv448398842=270, srv802808934=348, srv77960001=340, srv453521623=271, srv162773041=114, srv563606057=295, srv1659238910=122, srv1279307656=55, srv1914255334=183, srv1296605582=61, srv2131597846=222, srv1375359355=72, srv1405269336=79, srv175680261=147, srv282211488=242, srv1412891098=82, srv375712549=257, srv191234370=182, srv1574132168=106, srv1853511149=168, srv617306884=307, srv268601623=238, srv1400099806=78, srv477381292=275, srv1279442050=56, srv535853198=292, srv1767480590=152, srv2100700333=211, srv1187847151=37, srv791064637=345, srv74478935=330, srv1206084762=41, srv1497856295=97, srv897884865=377, srv398014971=261, srv786136704=342, srv1429879791=86, srv1201763981=38, srv1415213844=84, srv302220908=243, srv156683359=105, srv1974497084=192, srv535358845=291, srv627763604=308, srv732106437=326, srv1679724304=130, srv576770232=299, srv478480013=276, srv1237250370=47, srv1169018295=34, srv32320833=248, srv594880186=304, srv216306370=225, srv656484240=315, srv818754908=354, srv1321058011=63, srv1256345927=52, srv1670847243=126, srv1515243164=99, srv1781378955=156, srv508388209=278, srv1910886192=180, srv1718898730=139, srv772274482=337, srv1433624807=87, srv848605385=359, srv2107957639=212, srv270591905=240, srv2126706298=219, srv2080681743=209, srv1683990934=132, srv11526364=28, srv761020484=334, srv1720507603=141, srv266276730=236, srv935213051=386, srv923440665=383, srv1911104834=181, srv1944131651=187, srv1162841146=30, srv1921230216=185, srv319459319=247, srv1168022226=33, srv57689659=300, srv716533901=324, srv1255156178=50, srv441379967=267, srv806979625=350, srv788255577=344, srv976533744=389, srv1317853355=62, srv1491073587=96, srv777865249=339, srv2130226580=221, srv873230355=370, srv971370780=388, srv2008207413=197, srv989150800=390, srv737980208=328, srv862088563=363, srv1716783669=138, srv1801293056=160, srv1363984373=68, srv515711115=282, srv1378945327=75, srv17002515=136, srv853498273=361, srv1825292480=165, srv2124576425=217, srv1889349340=175, srv527691188=286, srv1226737728=44, srv1781498156=157, srv104267960=11, srv1663644309=124, srv1672213768=127, srv740402944=329, srv555807163=294, srv566277037=296, srv734882045=327, srv1143683685=27, srv1021400966=5, srv694407347=319, srv1626790310=113, srv303328507=244, srv1869166689=171, srv781623755=341, srv40741117=264, srv1958265988=190, srv592380483=303, srv483565354=277, srv1531731329=100, srv359746409=253, srv1271131029=54, srv1007512250=2, srv1783696565=158, srv1284150263=57, srv1648846971=118, srv120365207=40, srv263085176=235, srv535080964=290, srv824739010=357, srv744793832=331, srv1073394883=18, srv1113186104=23, srv1370321362=69, srv328204461=249, srv1604342762=109, srv266460489=237, srv313806624=245, srv1473408823=93, srv865692144=366, srv42814401=265, srv104065318=10, srv1599236554=108, srv1476834435=94, srv1673452142=128, srv716892727=325, srv1501773847=98, srv791504502=346, srv367902453=254, srv254349567=232, srv2126102976=218, srv252714068=231, srv916506189=380, srv687320190=318, srv1000433998=0, srv51396503=281, srv648464134=313, srv908419423=379, srv204022732=200, srv1901650254=177, srv200342397=196, srv765841762=335, srv1849125656=167, srv235281774=226, srv2137298641=224, srv517347076=283, srv1687711069=135, srv800105834=347, srv1609917009=112, srv1038797815=9, srv863216619=365, srv921796978=382, srv895924009=376, srv319002955=246, srv611122413=305, srv1942590787=186, srv529333113=288, srv1053973741=14, srv1988512138=194, srv1037112526=8, srv442327402=268, srv2062351281=204, srv1240518778=48, srv471289019=274, srv1857090224=170, srv1543025253=101, srv1915241294=184, srv238420451=228, srv1747796150=145, srv1101668258=21, srv1437034663=88, srv1173449481=35, srv582652595=301, srv1739043021=144, srv1733173130=143, srv465824154=272, srv14463216=91, srv1720161153=140, srv1549403995=102, srv235920151=227, srv1909060246=179, srv527988350=287, srv1801762669=161, srv89501442=375, srv442994824=269, srv1414012241=83, srv165153258=121, srv1766333515=151, srv2063438865=205, srv1071671801=17, srv1638570398=116, srv1035353226=7, srv1856921753=169, srv1887444158=173, srv1897306674=176, srv1255718022=51, srv1260078897=53, srv1372945218=70, srv1163715139=31, srv175471358=146, srv1558656747=104, srv1463869996=92, srv124825865=49, srv1142495625=26, srv1397803774=77, srv1644508836=117, srv1807320536=162, srv1165273546=32, srv1650978005=120, srv1374260725=71, srv2065239646=206, srv1685737274=134, srv878340336=371, srv329463090=250, srv2112675912=213, srv1378293943=74, srv787532288=343, srv1292867420=59, srv519831391=285, srv1002018470=1, srv822141051=356, srv1229740495=45, srv706370370=321, srv255741565=233, srv1177018836=36, srv1223505925=43, srv745532463=332, srv1820836786=163, srv2127145828=220, srv2124524081=216, srv665150476=316, srv2132621880=223, srv2051928856=203, srv1903063797=178, srv881186303=373, srv1758974023=148, srv270549378=239, srv2014789268=198, srv1663469360=123, srv1331983035=65, srv1768940632=153, srv2084732799=210, srv1043044287=12, srv630246195=309, srv86319792=364, srv37305654=256, srv1650394019=119, srv1888093001=174, srv512441512=280, srv813969264=352, srv277288989=241, srv2017714321=199, srv1410469782=81, srv751917673=333, srv1443060804=89, srv1997063872=195, srv404426071=263, srv1443287861=90, srv695697141=320, srv636958174=310, srv1105584096=22, srv583005569=302, srv92523166=384, srv330226906=251, srv1684865692=133, srv381463497=258, srv567942525=297, srv1010403208=3, srv881516937=374, srv140693587=80, srv1872213858=172, srv262210172=234, srv846799674=358, srv851169364=360, srv880017865=372, srv129190288=58, srv401606217=262, srv669535820=317, srv1325384866=64, srv1377673856=73, srv1416276025=85, srv430431276=266, srv81513922=353, srv2044458062=201, srv2118166427=214, srv1665530216=125, srv2045587532=202, srv1824773168=164, srv2071913725=208, srv1295499145=60, srv1780304939=155, srv612277490=306, srv102508625=6, srv1637539828=115, srv820424989=355, srv50966795=279, srv1950402166=188, srv1207208580=42, srv1057648579=16, srv1084295726=20, srv39165764=260, srv959379519=387, srv2066402828=207, srv1556810592=103, srv1232731779=46, srv1606144164=110, srv1487275322=95, srv519310224=284, srv775221203=338, srv1079168923=19, srv1957834842=189, srv866525142=367, srv243907419=229, srv248553307=230, srv344122075=252, srv467461515=273, srv805609280=349, srv1018507425=4, srv1827511993=166, srv1704639485=137, srv855754935=362, srv1057024901=15, srv1116429721=24, srv927375731=385, srv1383836323=76, srv1584407048=107, srv809779157=351, srv1786622589=159, srv869541705=368, srv1123072042=25, srv1726136626=142, srv135800579=67, srv1958676591=191, srv390748718=259, srv907223095=378, srv76871917=336, srv1160170031=29, srv2119727728=215, srv918100507=381, srv1352063642=66, srv1975716907=193} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-17 21:53:14,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-17 21:53:14,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-17 21:53:14,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-17 21:53:14,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-17 21:53:14,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-17 21:53:14,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-17 21:53:14,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-17 21:53:14,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-17 21:53:14,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-17 21:53:14,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-17 21:53:14,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-17 21:53:14,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-17 21:53:14,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-17 21:53:14,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-17 21:53:14,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-17 21:53:14,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-17 21:53:14,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-17 21:53:14,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-17 21:53:14,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-17 21:53:14,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-17 21:53:14,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-17 21:53:14,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-17 21:53:14,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-17 21:53:14,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-17 21:53:14,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-17 21:53:14,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-17 21:53:14,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-17 21:53:14,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-17 21:53:14,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-17 21:53:14,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-17 21:53:14,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-17 21:53:14,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-17 21:53:14,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-17 21:53:14,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-17 21:53:14,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-17 21:53:14,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-17 21:53:14,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-17 21:53:14,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-17 21:53:14,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-17 21:53:14,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-17 21:53:14,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-17 21:53:14,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-17 21:53:14,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-17 21:53:14,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-17 21:53:14,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-17 21:53:14,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-17 21:53:14,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-17 21:53:14,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-17 21:53:14,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-17 21:53:14,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-17 21:53:14,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-17 21:53:14,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-17 21:53:14,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-17 21:53:14,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-17 21:53:14,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-17 21:53:14,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-17 21:53:14,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-17 21:53:14,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-17 21:53:14,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-17 21:53:14,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-17 21:53:14,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-17 21:53:14,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-17 21:53:14,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-17 21:53:14,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-17 21:53:14,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-17 21:53:14,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-17 21:53:14,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-17 21:53:14,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-17 21:53:14,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-17 21:53:14,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-17 21:53:14,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-17 21:53:14,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-17 21:53:14,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-17 21:53:14,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-17 21:53:14,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-17 21:53:14,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-17 21:53:14,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-17 21:53:14,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-17 21:53:14,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-17 21:53:14,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-17 21:53:14,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-17 21:53:14,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-17 21:53:14,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-17 21:53:14,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-17 21:53:14,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-17 21:53:14,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-17 21:53:14,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-17 21:53:14,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-17 21:53:14,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-17 21:53:14,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-17 21:53:14,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-17 21:53:14,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-17 21:53:14,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-17 21:53:14,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-17 21:53:14,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-17 21:53:14,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-17 21:53:14,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-17 21:53:14,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-17 21:53:14,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-17 21:53:14,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-17 21:53:14,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-17 21:53:14,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-17 21:53:14,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-17 21:53:14,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-17 21:53:14,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-17 21:53:14,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-17 21:53:14,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-17 21:53:14,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-17 21:53:14,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-17 21:53:14,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-17 21:53:14,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-17 21:53:14,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-17 21:53:14,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-17 21:53:14,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-17 21:53:14,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-17 21:53:14,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-17 21:53:14,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-17 21:53:14,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-17 21:53:14,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-17 21:53:14,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-17 21:53:14,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-17 21:53:14,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-17 21:53:14,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-17 21:53:14,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-17 21:53:14,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-17 21:53:14,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-17 21:53:14,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-17 21:53:14,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-17 21:53:14,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-17 21:53:14,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-17 21:53:14,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-17 21:53:14,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-17 21:53:14,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-17 21:53:14,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-17 21:53:14,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-17 21:53:14,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-17 21:53:14,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-17 21:53:14,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-17 21:53:14,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-17 21:53:14,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-17 21:53:14,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-17 21:53:14,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-17 21:53:14,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-17 21:53:14,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-17 21:53:14,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-17 21:53:14,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-17 21:53:14,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-17 21:53:14,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-17 21:53:14,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-17 21:53:14,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-17 21:53:14,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-17 21:53:14,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-17 21:53:14,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-17 21:53:14,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-17 21:53:14,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-17 21:53:14,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-17 21:53:14,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-17 21:53:14,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-17 21:53:14,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-17 21:53:14,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-17 21:53:14,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-17 21:53:14,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-17 21:53:14,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-17 21:53:14,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-17 21:53:14,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-17 21:53:14,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-17 21:53:14,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-17 21:53:14,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-17 21:53:14,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-17 21:53:14,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-17 21:53:14,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-17 21:53:14,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-17 21:53:14,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-17 21:53:14,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-17 21:53:14,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-17 21:53:14,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-17 21:53:14,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-17 21:53:14,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-17 21:53:14,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-17 21:53:14,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-17 21:53:14,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-17 21:53:14,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-17 21:53:14,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-17 21:53:14,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-17 21:53:14,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-17 21:53:14,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-17 21:53:14,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-17 21:53:14,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-17 21:53:14,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-17 21:53:14,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-17 21:53:14,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-17 21:53:14,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-17 21:53:14,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-17 21:53:14,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-17 21:53:14,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-17 21:53:14,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-17 21:53:14,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-17 21:53:14,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-17 21:53:14,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-17 21:53:14,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-17 21:53:14,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-17 21:53:14,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-17 21:53:14,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-17 21:53:14,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-17 21:53:14,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-17 21:53:14,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-17 21:53:14,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-17 21:53:14,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-17 21:53:14,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-17 21:53:14,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-17 21:53:14,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-17 21:53:14,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-17 21:53:14,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-17 21:53:14,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-17 21:53:14,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-17 21:53:14,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-17 21:53:14,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-17 21:53:14,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-17 21:53:14,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-17 21:53:14,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-17 21:53:14,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-17 21:53:14,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-17 21:53:14,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-17 21:53:14,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-17 21:53:14,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-17 21:53:14,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-17 21:53:14,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-17 21:53:14,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-17 21:53:14,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-17 21:53:14,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-17 21:53:14,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-17 21:53:14,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-17 21:53:14,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-17 21:53:14,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-17 21:53:14,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-17 21:53:14,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-17 21:53:14,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-17 21:53:14,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-17 21:53:14,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-17 21:53:14,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-17 21:53:14,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-17 21:53:14,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-17 21:53:14,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-17 21:53:14,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-17 21:53:14,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-17 21:53:14,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-17 21:53:14,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-17 21:53:14,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-17 21:53:14,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-17 21:53:14,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-17 21:53:14,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-17 21:53:14,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-17 21:53:14,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-17 21:53:14,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-17 21:53:14,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-17 21:53:14,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-17 21:53:14,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-17 21:53:14,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-17 21:53:14,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-17 21:53:14,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-17 21:53:14,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-17 21:53:14,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-17 21:53:14,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-17 21:53:14,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-17 21:53:14,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-17 21:53:14,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-17 21:53:14,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-17 21:53:14,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-17 21:53:14,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-17 21:53:14,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-17 21:53:14,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-17 21:53:14,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-17 21:53:14,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-17 21:53:14,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-17 21:53:14,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-17 21:53:14,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-17 21:53:14,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-17 21:53:14,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-17 21:53:14,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-17 21:53:14,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-17 21:53:14,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-17 21:53:14,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-17 21:53:14,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-17 21:53:14,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-17 21:53:14,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-17 21:53:14,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-17 21:53:14,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-17 21:53:14,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-17 21:53:14,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-17 21:53:14,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-17 21:53:14,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-17 21:53:14,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-17 21:53:14,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-17 21:53:14,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-17 21:53:14,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-17 21:53:14,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-17 21:53:14,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-17 21:53:14,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-17 21:53:14,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-17 21:53:14,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-17 21:53:14,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-17 21:53:14,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-17 21:53:14,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-17 21:53:14,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-17 21:53:14,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-17 21:53:14,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-17 21:53:14,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-17 21:53:14,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-17 21:53:14,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-17 21:53:14,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-17 21:53:14,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-17 21:53:14,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-17 21:53:14,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-17 21:53:14,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-17 21:53:14,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-17 21:53:14,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-17 21:53:14,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-17 21:53:14,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-17 21:53:14,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-17 21:53:14,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-17 21:53:14,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-17 21:53:14,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-17 21:53:14,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-17 21:53:14,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-17 21:53:14,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-17 21:53:14,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-17 21:53:14,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-17 21:53:14,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-17 21:53:14,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-17 21:53:14,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-17 21:53:14,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-17 21:53:14,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-17 21:53:14,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-17 21:53:14,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-17 21:53:14,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-17 21:53:14,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-17 21:53:14,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-17 21:53:14,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-17 21:53:14,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-17 21:53:14,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-17 21:53:14,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-17 21:53:14,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-17 21:53:14,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-17 21:53:14,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-17 21:53:14,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-17 21:53:14,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-17 21:53:14,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-17 21:53:14,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-17 21:53:14,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-17 21:53:14,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-17 21:53:14,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-17 21:53:14,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-17 21:53:14,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-17 21:53:14,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-17 21:53:14,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-17 21:53:14,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-17 21:53:14,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-17 21:53:14,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-17 21:53:14,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-17 21:53:14,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-17 21:53:14,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-17 21:53:14,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-17 21:53:14,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-17 21:53:14,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-17 21:53:14,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-17 21:53:14,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-17 21:53:14,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-17 21:53:14,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-17 21:53:14,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-17 21:53:14,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-17 21:53:14,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-17 21:53:14,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-17 21:53:14,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-17 21:53:14,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-17 21:53:14,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-17 21:53:14,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-17 21:53:14,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-17 21:53:14,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-17 21:53:14,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-17 21:53:14,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-17 21:53:14,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-17 21:53:14,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-17 21:53:14,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,974 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table45) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,974 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table35
2023-07-17 21:53:14,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv871358531=369, srv64697211=312, srv653261481=314, srv1778141916=154, srv716510755=323, srv372169288=255, srv568235512=298, srv710229516=322, srv537137712=293, srv1682791519=131, srv642353994=311, srv1046656068=13, srv993792848=391, srv1202667070=39, srv99567927=392, srv1607947050=111, srv1677371877=129, srv1763526149=150, srv1763378353=149, srv531263272=289, srv448398842=270, srv802808934=348, srv77960001=340, srv453521623=271, srv162773041=114, srv563606057=295, srv1659238910=122, srv1279307656=55, srv1914255334=183, srv1296605582=61, srv2131597846=222, srv1375359355=72, srv1405269336=79, srv175680261=147, srv282211488=242, srv1412891098=82, srv375712549=257, srv191234370=182, srv1574132168=106, srv1853511149=168, srv617306884=307, srv268601623=238, srv1400099806=78, srv477381292=275, srv1279442050=56, srv535853198=292, srv1767480590=152, srv2100700333=211, srv1187847151=37, srv791064637=345, srv74478935=330, srv1206084762=41, srv1497856295=97, srv897884865=377, srv398014971=261, srv786136704=342, srv1429879791=86, srv1201763981=38, srv1415213844=84, srv302220908=243, srv156683359=105, srv1974497084=192, srv535358845=291, srv627763604=308, srv732106437=326, srv1679724304=130, srv576770232=299, srv478480013=276, srv1237250370=47, srv1169018295=34, srv32320833=248, srv594880186=304, srv216306370=225, srv656484240=315, srv818754908=354, srv1321058011=63, srv1256345927=52, srv1670847243=126, srv1515243164=99, srv1781378955=156, srv508388209=278, srv1910886192=180, srv1718898730=139, srv772274482=337, srv1433624807=87, srv848605385=359, srv2107957639=212, srv270591905=240, srv2126706298=219, srv2080681743=209, srv1683990934=132, srv11526364=28, srv761020484=334, srv1720507603=141, srv266276730=236, srv935213051=386, srv923440665=383, srv1911104834=181, srv1944131651=187, srv1162841146=30, srv1921230216=185, srv319459319=247, srv1168022226=33, srv57689659=300, srv716533901=324, srv1255156178=50, srv441379967=267, srv806979625=350, srv788255577=344, srv976533744=389, srv1317853355=62, srv1491073587=96, srv777865249=339, srv2130226580=221, srv873230355=370, srv971370780=388, srv2008207413=197, srv989150800=390, srv737980208=328, srv862088563=363, srv1716783669=138, srv1801293056=160, srv1363984373=68, srv515711115=282, srv1378945327=75, srv17002515=136, srv853498273=361, srv1825292480=165, srv2124576425=217, srv1889349340=175, srv527691188=286, srv1226737728=44, srv1781498156=157, srv104267960=11, srv1663644309=124, srv1672213768=127, srv740402944=329, srv555807163=294, srv566277037=296, srv734882045=327, srv1143683685=27, srv1021400966=5, srv694407347=319, srv1626790310=113, srv303328507=244, srv1869166689=171, srv781623755=341, srv40741117=264, srv1958265988=190, srv592380483=303, srv483565354=277, srv1531731329=100, srv359746409=253, srv1271131029=54, srv1007512250=2, srv1783696565=158, srv1284150263=57, srv1648846971=118, srv120365207=40, srv263085176=235, srv535080964=290, srv824739010=357, srv744793832=331, srv1073394883=18, srv1113186104=23, srv1370321362=69, srv328204461=249, srv1604342762=109, srv266460489=237, srv313806624=245, srv1473408823=93, srv865692144=366, srv42814401=265, srv104065318=10, srv1599236554=108, srv1476834435=94, srv1673452142=128, srv716892727=325, srv1501773847=98, srv791504502=346, srv367902453=254, srv254349567=232, srv2126102976=218, srv252714068=231, srv916506189=380, srv687320190=318, srv1000433998=0, srv51396503=281, srv648464134=313, srv908419423=379, srv204022732=200, srv1901650254=177, srv200342397=196, srv765841762=335, srv1849125656=167, srv235281774=226, srv2137298641=224, srv517347076=283, srv1687711069=135, srv800105834=347, srv1609917009=112, srv1038797815=9, srv863216619=365, srv921796978=382, srv895924009=376, srv319002955=246, srv611122413=305, srv1942590787=186, srv529333113=288, srv1053973741=14, srv1988512138=194, srv1037112526=8, srv442327402=268, srv2062351281=204, srv1240518778=48, srv471289019=274, srv1857090224=170, srv1543025253=101, srv1915241294=184, srv238420451=228, srv1747796150=145, srv1101668258=21, srv1437034663=88, srv1173449481=35, srv582652595=301, srv1739043021=144, srv1733173130=143, srv465824154=272, srv14463216=91, srv1720161153=140, srv1549403995=102, srv235920151=227, srv1909060246=179, srv527988350=287, srv1801762669=161, srv89501442=375, srv442994824=269, srv1414012241=83, srv165153258=121, srv1766333515=151, srv2063438865=205, srv1071671801=17, srv1638570398=116, srv1035353226=7, srv1856921753=169, srv1887444158=173, srv1897306674=176, srv1255718022=51, srv1260078897=53, srv1372945218=70, srv1163715139=31, srv175471358=146, srv1558656747=104, srv1463869996=92, srv124825865=49, srv1142495625=26, srv1397803774=77, srv1644508836=117, srv1807320536=162, srv1165273546=32, srv1650978005=120, srv1374260725=71, srv2065239646=206, srv1685737274=134, srv878340336=371, srv329463090=250, srv2112675912=213, srv1378293943=74, srv787532288=343, srv1292867420=59, srv519831391=285, srv1002018470=1, srv822141051=356, srv1229740495=45, srv706370370=321, srv255741565=233, srv1177018836=36, srv1223505925=43, srv745532463=332, srv1820836786=163, srv2127145828=220, srv2124524081=216, srv665150476=316, srv2132621880=223, srv2051928856=203, srv1903063797=178, srv881186303=373, srv1758974023=148, srv270549378=239, srv2014789268=198, srv1663469360=123, srv1331983035=65, srv1768940632=153, srv2084732799=210, srv1043044287=12, srv630246195=309, srv86319792=364, srv37305654=256, srv1650394019=119, srv1888093001=174, srv512441512=280, srv813969264=352, srv277288989=241, srv2017714321=199, srv1410469782=81, srv751917673=333, srv1443060804=89, srv1997063872=195, srv404426071=263, srv1443287861=90, srv695697141=320, srv636958174=310, srv1105584096=22, srv583005569=302, srv92523166=384, srv330226906=251, srv1684865692=133, srv381463497=258, srv567942525=297, srv1010403208=3, srv881516937=374, srv140693587=80, srv1872213858=172, srv262210172=234, srv846799674=358, srv851169364=360, srv880017865=372, srv129190288=58, srv401606217=262, srv669535820=317, srv1325384866=64, srv1377673856=73, srv1416276025=85, srv430431276=266, srv81513922=353, srv2044458062=201, srv2118166427=214, srv1665530216=125, srv2045587532=202, srv1824773168=164, srv2071913725=208, srv1295499145=60, srv1780304939=155, srv612277490=306, srv102508625=6, srv1637539828=115, srv820424989=355, srv50966795=279, srv1950402166=188, srv1207208580=42, srv1057648579=16, srv1084295726=20, srv39165764=260, srv959379519=387, srv2066402828=207, srv1556810592=103, srv1232731779=46, srv1606144164=110, srv1487275322=95, srv519310224=284, srv775221203=338, srv1079168923=19, srv1957834842=189, srv866525142=367, srv243907419=229, srv248553307=230, srv344122075=252, srv467461515=273, srv805609280=349, srv1018507425=4, srv1827511993=166, srv1704639485=137, srv855754935=362, srv1057024901=15, srv1116429721=24, srv927375731=385, srv1383836323=76, srv1584407048=107, srv809779157=351, srv1786622589=159, srv869541705=368, srv1123072042=25, srv1726136626=142, srv135800579=67, srv1958676591=191, srv390748718=259, srv907223095=378, srv76871917=336, srv1160170031=29, srv2119727728=215, srv918100507=381, srv1352063642=66, srv1975716907=193} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-17 21:53:14,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-17 21:53:14,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-17 21:53:14,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-17 21:53:14,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-17 21:53:14,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-17 21:53:14,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-17 21:53:14,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-17 21:53:14,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-17 21:53:14,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-17 21:53:14,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-17 21:53:14,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-17 21:53:14,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-17 21:53:14,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-17 21:53:14,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-17 21:53:14,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-17 21:53:14,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-17 21:53:14,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-17 21:53:14,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-17 21:53:14,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-17 21:53:14,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-17 21:53:14,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-17 21:53:14,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-17 21:53:14,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-17 21:53:14,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-17 21:53:14,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-17 21:53:14,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-17 21:53:14,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-17 21:53:14,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-17 21:53:14,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-17 21:53:14,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-17 21:53:14,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-17 21:53:14,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-17 21:53:14,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-17 21:53:14,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-17 21:53:14,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-17 21:53:14,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-17 21:53:14,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-17 21:53:14,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-17 21:53:14,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-17 21:53:14,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-17 21:53:14,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-17 21:53:14,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-17 21:53:14,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-17 21:53:14,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-17 21:53:14,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-17 21:53:14,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-17 21:53:14,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-17 21:53:14,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-17 21:53:14,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-17 21:53:14,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-17 21:53:14,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-17 21:53:14,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-17 21:53:14,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-17 21:53:14,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-17 21:53:14,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-17 21:53:14,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-17 21:53:14,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-17 21:53:14,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-17 21:53:14,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-17 21:53:14,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-17 21:53:14,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-17 21:53:14,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-17 21:53:14,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-17 21:53:14,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-17 21:53:14,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-17 21:53:14,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-17 21:53:14,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-17 21:53:14,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-17 21:53:14,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-17 21:53:14,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-17 21:53:14,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-17 21:53:14,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-17 21:53:14,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-17 21:53:14,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-17 21:53:14,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-17 21:53:14,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-17 21:53:14,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-17 21:53:14,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-17 21:53:14,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-17 21:53:14,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-17 21:53:14,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-17 21:53:14,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-17 21:53:14,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-17 21:53:14,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-17 21:53:14,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-17 21:53:14,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-17 21:53:14,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-17 21:53:14,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-17 21:53:14,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-17 21:53:14,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-17 21:53:14,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-17 21:53:14,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-17 21:53:14,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-17 21:53:14,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-17 21:53:14,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-17 21:53:14,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-17 21:53:14,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-17 21:53:14,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-17 21:53:14,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-17 21:53:14,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-17 21:53:14,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-17 21:53:14,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-17 21:53:14,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-17 21:53:14,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-17 21:53:14,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-17 21:53:14,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-17 21:53:14,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-17 21:53:14,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-17 21:53:14,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-17 21:53:14,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-17 21:53:14,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-17 21:53:14,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-17 21:53:14,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-17 21:53:14,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-17 21:53:14,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-17 21:53:14,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-17 21:53:14,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-17 21:53:14,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-17 21:53:14,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-17 21:53:14,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-17 21:53:14,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-17 21:53:14,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-17 21:53:14,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-17 21:53:14,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-17 21:53:14,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-17 21:53:14,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-17 21:53:14,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-17 21:53:14,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-17 21:53:14,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-17 21:53:14,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-17 21:53:14,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-17 21:53:14,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-17 21:53:14,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-17 21:53:14,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-17 21:53:14,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-17 21:53:14,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-17 21:53:14,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-17 21:53:14,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-17 21:53:14,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-17 21:53:14,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-17 21:53:14,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-17 21:53:14,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-17 21:53:14,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-17 21:53:14,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-17 21:53:14,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-17 21:53:14,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-17 21:53:14,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-17 21:53:14,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-17 21:53:14,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-17 21:53:14,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-17 21:53:14,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-17 21:53:14,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-17 21:53:14,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-17 21:53:14,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-17 21:53:14,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-17 21:53:14,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-17 21:53:14,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-17 21:53:14,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-17 21:53:14,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-17 21:53:14,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-17 21:53:14,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-17 21:53:14,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-17 21:53:14,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-17 21:53:14,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-17 21:53:14,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-17 21:53:14,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-17 21:53:14,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-17 21:53:14,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-17 21:53:14,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-17 21:53:14,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-17 21:53:14,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-17 21:53:14,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-17 21:53:14,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-17 21:53:14,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-17 21:53:14,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-17 21:53:14,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-17 21:53:14,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-17 21:53:14,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-17 21:53:14,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-17 21:53:14,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-17 21:53:14,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-17 21:53:14,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-17 21:53:14,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-17 21:53:14,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-17 21:53:14,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-17 21:53:14,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-17 21:53:14,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-17 21:53:14,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-17 21:53:14,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-17 21:53:14,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-17 21:53:14,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-17 21:53:14,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-17 21:53:14,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-17 21:53:14,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-17 21:53:14,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-17 21:53:14,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-17 21:53:14,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-17 21:53:14,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-17 21:53:14,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-17 21:53:14,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-17 21:53:14,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-17 21:53:14,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-17 21:53:14,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-17 21:53:14,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-17 21:53:14,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-17 21:53:14,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-17 21:53:14,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-17 21:53:14,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-17 21:53:14,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-17 21:53:14,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-17 21:53:14,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-17 21:53:14,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-17 21:53:14,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-17 21:53:14,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-17 21:53:14,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-17 21:53:14,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-17 21:53:14,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-17 21:53:14,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-17 21:53:14,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-17 21:53:14,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-17 21:53:14,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-17 21:53:14,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-17 21:53:14,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-17 21:53:14,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-17 21:53:14,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-17 21:53:14,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-17 21:53:14,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-17 21:53:14,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-17 21:53:14,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-17 21:53:14,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-17 21:53:14,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-17 21:53:14,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-17 21:53:14,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-17 21:53:14,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-17 21:53:14,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-17 21:53:14,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-17 21:53:14,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-17 21:53:14,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-17 21:53:14,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-17 21:53:14,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-17 21:53:14,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-17 21:53:14,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-17 21:53:14,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-17 21:53:14,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-17 21:53:14,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-17 21:53:14,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-17 21:53:14,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-17 21:53:14,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-17 21:53:14,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-17 21:53:14,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-17 21:53:14,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-17 21:53:14,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-17 21:53:14,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-17 21:53:14,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-17 21:53:14,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-17 21:53:14,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-17 21:53:14,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-17 21:53:14,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-17 21:53:14,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-17 21:53:14,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-17 21:53:14,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-17 21:53:14,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-17 21:53:14,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-17 21:53:14,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-17 21:53:14,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-17 21:53:14,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-17 21:53:14,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-17 21:53:14,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-17 21:53:14,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-17 21:53:14,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-17 21:53:14,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-17 21:53:14,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-17 21:53:14,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-17 21:53:14,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-17 21:53:14,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-17 21:53:14,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-17 21:53:14,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-17 21:53:14,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-17 21:53:14,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-17 21:53:14,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-17 21:53:14,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-17 21:53:14,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-17 21:53:14,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-17 21:53:14,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-17 21:53:14,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-17 21:53:14,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-17 21:53:14,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-17 21:53:14,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-17 21:53:14,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-17 21:53:14,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-17 21:53:14,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-17 21:53:14,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-17 21:53:14,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-17 21:53:14,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-17 21:53:14,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-17 21:53:14,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-17 21:53:14,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-17 21:53:14,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-17 21:53:14,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-17 21:53:14,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-17 21:53:14,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-17 21:53:14,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-17 21:53:14,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-17 21:53:14,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-17 21:53:14,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-17 21:53:14,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-17 21:53:14,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-17 21:53:14,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-17 21:53:14,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-17 21:53:14,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-17 21:53:14,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-17 21:53:14,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-17 21:53:14,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-17 21:53:14,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-17 21:53:14,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-17 21:53:14,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-17 21:53:14,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-17 21:53:14,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-17 21:53:14,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-17 21:53:14,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-17 21:53:14,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-17 21:53:14,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-17 21:53:14,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-17 21:53:14,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-17 21:53:14,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-17 21:53:14,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-17 21:53:14,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-17 21:53:14,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-17 21:53:14,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-17 21:53:14,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-17 21:53:14,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-17 21:53:14,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-17 21:53:14,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-17 21:53:14,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-17 21:53:14,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-17 21:53:14,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-17 21:53:14,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-17 21:53:14,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-17 21:53:14,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-17 21:53:14,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-17 21:53:14,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-17 21:53:14,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-17 21:53:14,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-17 21:53:14,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-17 21:53:14,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-17 21:53:14,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-17 21:53:14,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-17 21:53:14,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-17 21:53:14,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-17 21:53:14,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-17 21:53:14,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-17 21:53:14,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-17 21:53:14,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-17 21:53:14,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-17 21:53:14,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-17 21:53:14,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-17 21:53:14,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-17 21:53:14,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-17 21:53:14,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-17 21:53:14,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-17 21:53:14,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-17 21:53:14,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-17 21:53:14,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-17 21:53:14,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-17 21:53:14,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-17 21:53:14,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-17 21:53:14,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-17 21:53:14,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-17 21:53:14,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-17 21:53:14,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-17 21:53:14,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-17 21:53:14,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-17 21:53:14,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-17 21:53:14,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-17 21:53:14,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-17 21:53:14,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-17 21:53:14,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-17 21:53:14,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-17 21:53:14,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-17 21:53:14,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-17 21:53:14,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-17 21:53:14,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-17 21:53:14,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,989 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table35) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:14,989 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table36
2023-07-17 21:53:14,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv871358531=369, srv64697211=312, srv653261481=314, srv1778141916=154, srv716510755=323, srv372169288=255, srv568235512=298, srv710229516=322, srv537137712=293, srv1682791519=131, srv642353994=311, srv1046656068=13, srv993792848=391, srv1202667070=39, srv99567927=392, srv1607947050=111, srv1677371877=129, srv1763526149=150, srv1763378353=149, srv531263272=289, srv448398842=270, srv802808934=348, srv77960001=340, srv453521623=271, srv162773041=114, srv563606057=295, srv1659238910=122, srv1279307656=55, srv1914255334=183, srv1296605582=61, srv2131597846=222, srv1375359355=72, srv1405269336=79, srv175680261=147, srv282211488=242, srv1412891098=82, srv375712549=257, srv191234370=182, srv1574132168=106, srv1853511149=168, srv617306884=307, srv268601623=238, srv1400099806=78, srv477381292=275, srv1279442050=56, srv535853198=292, srv1767480590=152, srv2100700333=211, srv1187847151=37, srv791064637=345, srv74478935=330, srv1206084762=41, srv1497856295=97, srv897884865=377, srv398014971=261, srv786136704=342, srv1429879791=86, srv1201763981=38, srv1415213844=84, srv302220908=243, srv156683359=105, srv1974497084=192, srv535358845=291, srv627763604=308, srv732106437=326, srv1679724304=130, srv576770232=299, srv478480013=276, srv1237250370=47, srv1169018295=34, srv32320833=248, srv594880186=304, srv216306370=225, srv656484240=315, srv818754908=354, srv1321058011=63, srv1256345927=52, srv1670847243=126, srv1515243164=99, srv1781378955=156, srv508388209=278, srv1910886192=180, srv1718898730=139, srv772274482=337, srv1433624807=87, srv848605385=359, srv2107957639=212, srv270591905=240, srv2126706298=219, srv2080681743=209, srv1683990934=132, srv11526364=28, srv761020484=334, srv1720507603=141, srv266276730=236, srv935213051=386, srv923440665=383, srv1911104834=181, srv1944131651=187, srv1162841146=30, srv1921230216=185, srv319459319=247, srv1168022226=33, srv57689659=300, srv716533901=324, srv1255156178=50, srv441379967=267, srv806979625=350, srv788255577=344, srv976533744=389, srv1317853355=62, srv1491073587=96, srv777865249=339, srv2130226580=221, srv873230355=370, srv971370780=388, srv2008207413=197, srv989150800=390, srv737980208=328, srv862088563=363, srv1716783669=138, srv1801293056=160, srv1363984373=68, srv515711115=282, srv1378945327=75, srv17002515=136, srv853498273=361, srv1825292480=165, srv2124576425=217, srv1889349340=175, srv527691188=286, srv1226737728=44, srv1781498156=157, srv104267960=11, srv1663644309=124, srv1672213768=127, srv740402944=329, srv555807163=294, srv566277037=296, srv734882045=327, srv1143683685=27, srv1021400966=5, srv694407347=319, srv1626790310=113, srv303328507=244, srv1869166689=171, srv781623755=341, srv40741117=264, srv1958265988=190, srv592380483=303, srv483565354=277, srv1531731329=100, srv359746409=253, srv1271131029=54, srv1007512250=2, srv1783696565=158, srv1284150263=57, srv1648846971=118, srv120365207=40, srv263085176=235, srv535080964=290, srv824739010=357, srv744793832=331, srv1073394883=18, srv1113186104=23, srv1370321362=69, srv328204461=249, srv1604342762=109, srv266460489=237, srv313806624=245, srv1473408823=93, srv865692144=366, srv42814401=265, srv104065318=10, srv1599236554=108, srv1476834435=94, srv1673452142=128, srv716892727=325, srv1501773847=98, srv791504502=346, srv367902453=254, srv254349567=232, srv2126102976=218, srv252714068=231, srv916506189=380, srv687320190=318, srv1000433998=0, srv51396503=281, srv648464134=313, srv908419423=379, srv204022732=200, srv1901650254=177, srv200342397=196, srv765841762=335, srv1849125656=167, srv235281774=226, srv2137298641=224, srv517347076=283, srv1687711069=135, srv800105834=347, srv1609917009=112, srv1038797815=9, srv863216619=365, srv921796978=382, srv895924009=376, srv319002955=246, srv611122413=305, srv1942590787=186, srv529333113=288, srv1053973741=14, srv1988512138=194, srv1037112526=8, srv442327402=268, srv2062351281=204, srv1240518778=48, srv471289019=274, srv1857090224=170, srv1543025253=101, srv1915241294=184, srv238420451=228, srv1747796150=145, srv1101668258=21, srv1437034663=88, srv1173449481=35, srv582652595=301, srv1739043021=144, srv1733173130=143, srv465824154=272, srv14463216=91, srv1720161153=140, srv1549403995=102, srv235920151=227, srv1909060246=179, srv527988350=287, srv1801762669=161, srv89501442=375, srv442994824=269, srv1414012241=83, srv165153258=121, srv1766333515=151, srv2063438865=205, srv1071671801=17, srv1638570398=116, srv1035353226=7, srv1856921753=169, srv1887444158=173, srv1897306674=176, srv1255718022=51, srv1260078897=53, srv1372945218=70, srv1163715139=31, srv175471358=146, srv1558656747=104, srv1463869996=92, srv124825865=49, srv1142495625=26, srv1397803774=77, srv1644508836=117, srv1807320536=162, srv1165273546=32, srv1650978005=120, srv1374260725=71, srv2065239646=206, srv1685737274=134, srv878340336=371, srv329463090=250, srv2112675912=213, srv1378293943=74, srv787532288=343, srv1292867420=59, srv519831391=285, srv1002018470=1, srv822141051=356, srv1229740495=45, srv706370370=321, srv255741565=233, srv1177018836=36, srv1223505925=43, srv745532463=332, srv1820836786=163, srv2127145828=220, srv2124524081=216, srv665150476=316, srv2132621880=223, srv2051928856=203, srv1903063797=178, srv881186303=373, srv1758974023=148, srv270549378=239, srv2014789268=198, srv1663469360=123, srv1331983035=65, srv1768940632=153, srv2084732799=210, srv1043044287=12, srv630246195=309, srv86319792=364, srv37305654=256, srv1650394019=119, srv1888093001=174, srv512441512=280, srv813969264=352, srv277288989=241, srv2017714321=199, srv1410469782=81, srv751917673=333, srv1443060804=89, srv1997063872=195, srv404426071=263, srv1443287861=90, srv695697141=320, srv636958174=310, srv1105584096=22, srv583005569=302, srv92523166=384, srv330226906=251, srv1684865692=133, srv381463497=258, srv567942525=297, srv1010403208=3, srv881516937=374, srv140693587=80, srv1872213858=172, srv262210172=234, srv846799674=358, srv851169364=360, srv880017865=372, srv129190288=58, srv401606217=262, srv669535820=317, srv1325384866=64, srv1377673856=73, srv1416276025=85, srv430431276=266, srv81513922=353, srv2044458062=201, srv2118166427=214, srv1665530216=125, srv2045587532=202, srv1824773168=164, srv2071913725=208, srv1295499145=60, srv1780304939=155, srv612277490=306, srv102508625=6, srv1637539828=115, srv820424989=355, srv50966795=279, srv1950402166=188, srv1207208580=42, srv1057648579=16, srv1084295726=20, srv39165764=260, srv959379519=387, srv2066402828=207, srv1556810592=103, srv1232731779=46, srv1606144164=110, srv1487275322=95, srv519310224=284, srv775221203=338, srv1079168923=19, srv1957834842=189, srv866525142=367, srv243907419=229, srv248553307=230, srv344122075=252, srv467461515=273, srv805609280=349, srv1018507425=4, srv1827511993=166, srv1704639485=137, srv855754935=362, srv1057024901=15, srv1116429721=24, srv927375731=385, srv1383836323=76, srv1584407048=107, srv809779157=351, srv1786622589=159, srv869541705=368, srv1123072042=25, srv1726136626=142, srv135800579=67, srv1958676591=191, srv390748718=259, srv907223095=378, srv76871917=336, srv1160170031=29, srv2119727728=215, srv918100507=381, srv1352063642=66, srv1975716907=193} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:14,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:14,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:14,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:14,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:14,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:14,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:14,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:14,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:14,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:14,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:14,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-17 21:53:14,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-17 21:53:14,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-17 21:53:14,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-17 21:53:14,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-17 21:53:14,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-17 21:53:14,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-17 21:53:14,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-17 21:53:14,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-17 21:53:14,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-17 21:53:14,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-17 21:53:14,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-17 21:53:14,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-17 21:53:14,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-17 21:53:14,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-17 21:53:14,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-17 21:53:14,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-17 21:53:14,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-17 21:53:14,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-17 21:53:14,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-17 21:53:14,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-17 21:53:14,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-17 21:53:14,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-17 21:53:14,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-17 21:53:14,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-17 21:53:14,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-17 21:53:14,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-17 21:53:14,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-17 21:53:14,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-17 21:53:14,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-17 21:53:14,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-17 21:53:14,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-17 21:53:14,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-17 21:53:14,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-17 21:53:14,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-17 21:53:14,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-17 21:53:14,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-17 21:53:14,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-17 21:53:14,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-17 21:53:14,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-17 21:53:14,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-17 21:53:14,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-17 21:53:14,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-17 21:53:14,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-17 21:53:14,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-17 21:53:14,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-17 21:53:14,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-17 21:53:14,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-17 21:53:14,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-17 21:53:14,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-17 21:53:14,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-17 21:53:14,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-17 21:53:14,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-17 21:53:14,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-17 21:53:14,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-17 21:53:14,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-17 21:53:14,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-17 21:53:14,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-17 21:53:14,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-17 21:53:14,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-17 21:53:14,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-17 21:53:14,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-17 21:53:14,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-17 21:53:14,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-17 21:53:14,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-17 21:53:14,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-17 21:53:14,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-17 21:53:14,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-17 21:53:14,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-17 21:53:14,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-17 21:53:14,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-17 21:53:14,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-17 21:53:14,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-17 21:53:14,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-17 21:53:14,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-17 21:53:14,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-17 21:53:14,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-17 21:53:14,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-17 21:53:14,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-17 21:53:14,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-17 21:53:14,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-17 21:53:14,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-17 21:53:14,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-17 21:53:14,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-17 21:53:14,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-17 21:53:14,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-17 21:53:14,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-17 21:53:14,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-17 21:53:14,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-17 21:53:14,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-17 21:53:14,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-17 21:53:14,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-17 21:53:14,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-17 21:53:14,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-17 21:53:14,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-17 21:53:14,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-17 21:53:14,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-17 21:53:14,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-17 21:53:14,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-17 21:53:14,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-17 21:53:14,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-17 21:53:14,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-17 21:53:14,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-17 21:53:14,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-17 21:53:14,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-17 21:53:14,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-17 21:53:14,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-17 21:53:14,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-17 21:53:14,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-17 21:53:14,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-17 21:53:14,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-17 21:53:14,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-17 21:53:14,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-17 21:53:14,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-17 21:53:14,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-17 21:53:14,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-17 21:53:14,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-17 21:53:14,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-17 21:53:14,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-17 21:53:14,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-17 21:53:14,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-17 21:53:14,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-17 21:53:14,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-17 21:53:14,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-17 21:53:14,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-17 21:53:14,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-17 21:53:14,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-17 21:53:14,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-17 21:53:14,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-17 21:53:14,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-17 21:53:14,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-17 21:53:14,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-17 21:53:14,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-17 21:53:14,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-17 21:53:14,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-17 21:53:14,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-17 21:53:14,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-17 21:53:14,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-17 21:53:14,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-17 21:53:14,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-17 21:53:14,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-17 21:53:14,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-17 21:53:14,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-17 21:53:14,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-17 21:53:14,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-17 21:53:14,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-17 21:53:14,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-17 21:53:14,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-17 21:53:14,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-17 21:53:14,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-17 21:53:14,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-17 21:53:14,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-17 21:53:14,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-17 21:53:14,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-17 21:53:14,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-17 21:53:14,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-17 21:53:14,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-17 21:53:14,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-17 21:53:14,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-17 21:53:14,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-17 21:53:14,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-17 21:53:14,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-17 21:53:14,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-17 21:53:14,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-17 21:53:14,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-17 21:53:14,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-17 21:53:14,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-17 21:53:14,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-17 21:53:14,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-17 21:53:14,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-17 21:53:14,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-17 21:53:14,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-17 21:53:14,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-17 21:53:14,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-17 21:53:14,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-17 21:53:14,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-17 21:53:14,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-17 21:53:14,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-17 21:53:14,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-17 21:53:14,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-17 21:53:14,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-17 21:53:14,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-17 21:53:14,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-17 21:53:14,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-17 21:53:14,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-17 21:53:14,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-17 21:53:14,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-17 21:53:14,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-17 21:53:14,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-17 21:53:14,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-17 21:53:14,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-17 21:53:14,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-17 21:53:14,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-17 21:53:14,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-17 21:53:14,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-17 21:53:14,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-17 21:53:14,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-17 21:53:14,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-17 21:53:14,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-17 21:53:14,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-17 21:53:14,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-17 21:53:14,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-17 21:53:14,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-17 21:53:14,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-17 21:53:14,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-17 21:53:14,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-17 21:53:14,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-17 21:53:14,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-17 21:53:14,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-17 21:53:14,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-17 21:53:14,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-17 21:53:14,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-17 21:53:14,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-17 21:53:14,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-17 21:53:14,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-17 21:53:14,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-17 21:53:14,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-17 21:53:14,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-17 21:53:14,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-17 21:53:14,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-17 21:53:14,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-17 21:53:14,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-17 21:53:14,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-17 21:53:14,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-17 21:53:14,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-17 21:53:14,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-17 21:53:14,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-17 21:53:14,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-17 21:53:14,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-17 21:53:14,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-17 21:53:14,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-17 21:53:14,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-17 21:53:14,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-17 21:53:14,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-17 21:53:14,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-17 21:53:14,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-17 21:53:14,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-17 21:53:14,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-17 21:53:14,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-17 21:53:14,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-17 21:53:14,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-17 21:53:14,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-17 21:53:14,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-17 21:53:14,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-17 21:53:14,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-17 21:53:14,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-17 21:53:14,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-17 21:53:14,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-17 21:53:14,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-17 21:53:14,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-17 21:53:14,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-17 21:53:14,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-17 21:53:14,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-17 21:53:14,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-17 21:53:14,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-17 21:53:14,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-17 21:53:14,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-17 21:53:14,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-17 21:53:15,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-17 21:53:15,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-17 21:53:15,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-17 21:53:15,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-17 21:53:15,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-17 21:53:15,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-17 21:53:15,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-17 21:53:15,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-17 21:53:15,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-17 21:53:15,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-17 21:53:15,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-17 21:53:15,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-17 21:53:15,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-17 21:53:15,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-17 21:53:15,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-17 21:53:15,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-17 21:53:15,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-17 21:53:15,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-17 21:53:15,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-17 21:53:15,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-17 21:53:15,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-17 21:53:15,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-17 21:53:15,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-17 21:53:15,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-17 21:53:15,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-17 21:53:15,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-17 21:53:15,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-17 21:53:15,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-17 21:53:15,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-17 21:53:15,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-17 21:53:15,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-17 21:53:15,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-17 21:53:15,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-17 21:53:15,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-17 21:53:15,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-17 21:53:15,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-17 21:53:15,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-17 21:53:15,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-17 21:53:15,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-17 21:53:15,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-17 21:53:15,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-17 21:53:15,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-17 21:53:15,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-17 21:53:15,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-17 21:53:15,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-17 21:53:15,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-17 21:53:15,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-17 21:53:15,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-17 21:53:15,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-17 21:53:15,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-17 21:53:15,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-17 21:53:15,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-17 21:53:15,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-17 21:53:15,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-17 21:53:15,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-17 21:53:15,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-17 21:53:15,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-17 21:53:15,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-17 21:53:15,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-17 21:53:15,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-17 21:53:15,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-17 21:53:15,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-17 21:53:15,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-17 21:53:15,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-17 21:53:15,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-17 21:53:15,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-17 21:53:15,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-17 21:53:15,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-17 21:53:15,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-17 21:53:15,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-17 21:53:15,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-17 21:53:15,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-17 21:53:15,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-17 21:53:15,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-17 21:53:15,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-17 21:53:15,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-17 21:53:15,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-17 21:53:15,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-17 21:53:15,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-17 21:53:15,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-17 21:53:15,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-17 21:53:15,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-17 21:53:15,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-17 21:53:15,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-17 21:53:15,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-17 21:53:15,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-17 21:53:15,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-17 21:53:15,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-17 21:53:15,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-17 21:53:15,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-17 21:53:15,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-17 21:53:15,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-17 21:53:15,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-17 21:53:15,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-17 21:53:15,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-17 21:53:15,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-17 21:53:15,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-17 21:53:15,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-17 21:53:15,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-17 21:53:15,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-17 21:53:15,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-17 21:53:15,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-17 21:53:15,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-17 21:53:15,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-17 21:53:15,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-17 21:53:15,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-17 21:53:15,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-17 21:53:15,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-17 21:53:15,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-17 21:53:15,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-17 21:53:15,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-17 21:53:15,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-17 21:53:15,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-17 21:53:15,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-17 21:53:15,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-17 21:53:15,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-17 21:53:15,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-17 21:53:15,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-17 21:53:15,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-17 21:53:15,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-17 21:53:15,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-17 21:53:15,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-17 21:53:15,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-17 21:53:15,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-17 21:53:15,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-17 21:53:15,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:15,004 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table36) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:15,004 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table37
2023-07-17 21:53:15,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv871358531=369, srv64697211=312, srv653261481=314, srv1778141916=154, srv716510755=323, srv372169288=255, srv568235512=298, srv710229516=322, srv537137712=293, srv1682791519=131, srv642353994=311, srv1046656068=13, srv993792848=391, srv1202667070=39, srv99567927=392, srv1607947050=111, srv1677371877=129, srv1763526149=150, srv1763378353=149, srv531263272=289, srv448398842=270, srv802808934=348, srv77960001=340, srv453521623=271, srv162773041=114, srv563606057=295, srv1659238910=122, srv1279307656=55, srv1914255334=183, srv1296605582=61, srv2131597846=222, srv1375359355=72, srv1405269336=79, srv175680261=147, srv282211488=242, srv1412891098=82, srv375712549=257, srv191234370=182, srv1574132168=106, srv1853511149=168, srv617306884=307, srv268601623=238, srv1400099806=78, srv477381292=275, srv1279442050=56, srv535853198=292, srv1767480590=152, srv2100700333=211, srv1187847151=37, srv791064637=345, srv74478935=330, srv1206084762=41, srv1497856295=97, srv897884865=377, srv398014971=261, srv786136704=342, srv1429879791=86, srv1201763981=38, srv1415213844=84, srv302220908=243, srv156683359=105, srv1974497084=192, srv535358845=291, srv627763604=308, srv732106437=326, srv1679724304=130, srv576770232=299, srv478480013=276, srv1237250370=47, srv1169018295=34, srv32320833=248, srv594880186=304, srv216306370=225, srv656484240=315, srv818754908=354, srv1321058011=63, srv1256345927=52, srv1670847243=126, srv1515243164=99, srv1781378955=156, srv508388209=278, srv1910886192=180, srv1718898730=139, srv772274482=337, srv1433624807=87, srv848605385=359, srv2107957639=212, srv270591905=240, srv2126706298=219, srv2080681743=209, srv1683990934=132, srv11526364=28, srv761020484=334, srv1720507603=141, srv266276730=236, srv935213051=386, srv923440665=383, srv1911104834=181, srv1944131651=187, srv1162841146=30, srv1921230216=185, srv319459319=247, srv1168022226=33, srv57689659=300, srv716533901=324, srv1255156178=50, srv441379967=267, srv806979625=350, srv788255577=344, srv976533744=389, srv1317853355=62, srv1491073587=96, srv777865249=339, srv2130226580=221, srv873230355=370, srv971370780=388, srv2008207413=197, srv989150800=390, srv737980208=328, srv862088563=363, srv1716783669=138, srv1801293056=160, srv1363984373=68, srv515711115=282, srv1378945327=75, srv17002515=136, srv853498273=361, srv1825292480=165, srv2124576425=217, srv1889349340=175, srv527691188=286, srv1226737728=44, srv1781498156=157, srv104267960=11, srv1663644309=124, srv1672213768=127, srv740402944=329, srv555807163=294, srv566277037=296, srv734882045=327, srv1143683685=27, srv1021400966=5, srv694407347=319, srv1626790310=113, srv303328507=244, srv1869166689=171, srv781623755=341, srv40741117=264, srv1958265988=190, srv592380483=303, srv483565354=277, srv1531731329=100, srv359746409=253, srv1271131029=54, srv1007512250=2, srv1783696565=158, srv1284150263=57, srv1648846971=118, srv120365207=40, srv263085176=235, srv535080964=290, srv824739010=357, srv744793832=331, srv1073394883=18, srv1113186104=23, srv1370321362=69, srv328204461=249, srv1604342762=109, srv266460489=237, srv313806624=245, srv1473408823=93, srv865692144=366, srv42814401=265, srv104065318=10, srv1599236554=108, srv1476834435=94, srv1673452142=128, srv716892727=325, srv1501773847=98, srv791504502=346, srv367902453=254, srv254349567=232, srv2126102976=218, srv252714068=231, srv916506189=380, srv687320190=318, srv1000433998=0, srv51396503=281, srv648464134=313, srv908419423=379, srv204022732=200, srv1901650254=177, srv200342397=196, srv765841762=335, srv1849125656=167, srv235281774=226, srv2137298641=224, srv517347076=283, srv1687711069=135, srv800105834=347, srv1609917009=112, srv1038797815=9, srv863216619=365, srv921796978=382, srv895924009=376, srv319002955=246, srv611122413=305, srv1942590787=186, srv529333113=288, srv1053973741=14, srv1988512138=194, srv1037112526=8, srv442327402=268, srv2062351281=204, srv1240518778=48, srv471289019=274, srv1857090224=170, srv1543025253=101, srv1915241294=184, srv238420451=228, srv1747796150=145, srv1101668258=21, srv1437034663=88, srv1173449481=35, srv582652595=301, srv1739043021=144, srv1733173130=143, srv465824154=272, srv14463216=91, srv1720161153=140, srv1549403995=102, srv235920151=227, srv1909060246=179, srv527988350=287, srv1801762669=161, srv89501442=375, srv442994824=269, srv1414012241=83, srv165153258=121, srv1766333515=151, srv2063438865=205, srv1071671801=17, srv1638570398=116, srv1035353226=7, srv1856921753=169, srv1887444158=173, srv1897306674=176, srv1255718022=51, srv1260078897=53, srv1372945218=70, srv1163715139=31, srv175471358=146, srv1558656747=104, srv1463869996=92, srv124825865=49, srv1142495625=26, srv1397803774=77, srv1644508836=117, srv1807320536=162, srv1165273546=32, srv1650978005=120, srv1374260725=71, srv2065239646=206, srv1685737274=134, srv878340336=371, srv329463090=250, srv2112675912=213, srv1378293943=74, srv787532288=343, srv1292867420=59, srv519831391=285, srv1002018470=1, srv822141051=356, srv1229740495=45, srv706370370=321, srv255741565=233, srv1177018836=36, srv1223505925=43, srv745532463=332, srv1820836786=163, srv2127145828=220, srv2124524081=216, srv665150476=316, srv2132621880=223, srv2051928856=203, srv1903063797=178, srv881186303=373, srv1758974023=148, srv270549378=239, srv2014789268=198, srv1663469360=123, srv1331983035=65, srv1768940632=153, srv2084732799=210, srv1043044287=12, srv630246195=309, srv86319792=364, srv37305654=256, srv1650394019=119, srv1888093001=174, srv512441512=280, srv813969264=352, srv277288989=241, srv2017714321=199, srv1410469782=81, srv751917673=333, srv1443060804=89, srv1997063872=195, srv404426071=263, srv1443287861=90, srv695697141=320, srv636958174=310, srv1105584096=22, srv583005569=302, srv92523166=384, srv330226906=251, srv1684865692=133, srv381463497=258, srv567942525=297, srv1010403208=3, srv881516937=374, srv140693587=80, srv1872213858=172, srv262210172=234, srv846799674=358, srv851169364=360, srv880017865=372, srv129190288=58, srv401606217=262, srv669535820=317, srv1325384866=64, srv1377673856=73, srv1416276025=85, srv430431276=266, srv81513922=353, srv2044458062=201, srv2118166427=214, srv1665530216=125, srv2045587532=202, srv1824773168=164, srv2071913725=208, srv1295499145=60, srv1780304939=155, srv612277490=306, srv102508625=6, srv1637539828=115, srv820424989=355, srv50966795=279, srv1950402166=188, srv1207208580=42, srv1057648579=16, srv1084295726=20, srv39165764=260, srv959379519=387, srv2066402828=207, srv1556810592=103, srv1232731779=46, srv1606144164=110, srv1487275322=95, srv519310224=284, srv775221203=338, srv1079168923=19, srv1957834842=189, srv866525142=367, srv243907419=229, srv248553307=230, srv344122075=252, srv467461515=273, srv805609280=349, srv1018507425=4, srv1827511993=166, srv1704639485=137, srv855754935=362, srv1057024901=15, srv1116429721=24, srv927375731=385, srv1383836323=76, srv1584407048=107, srv809779157=351, srv1786622589=159, srv869541705=368, srv1123072042=25, srv1726136626=142, srv135800579=67, srv1958676591=191, srv390748718=259, srv907223095=378, srv76871917=336, srv1160170031=29, srv2119727728=215, srv918100507=381, srv1352063642=66, srv1975716907=193} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:15,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:15,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:15,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:15,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:15,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:15,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:15,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:15,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:15,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:15,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:15,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-17 21:53:15,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-17 21:53:15,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-17 21:53:15,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-17 21:53:15,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-17 21:53:15,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-17 21:53:15,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-17 21:53:15,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-17 21:53:15,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-17 21:53:15,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-17 21:53:15,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-17 21:53:15,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-17 21:53:15,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-17 21:53:15,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-17 21:53:15,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-17 21:53:15,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-17 21:53:15,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-17 21:53:15,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-17 21:53:15,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-17 21:53:15,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-17 21:53:15,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-17 21:53:15,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-17 21:53:15,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-17 21:53:15,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-17 21:53:15,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-17 21:53:15,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-17 21:53:15,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-17 21:53:15,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-17 21:53:15,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-17 21:53:15,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-17 21:53:15,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-17 21:53:15,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-17 21:53:15,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-17 21:53:15,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-17 21:53:15,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-17 21:53:15,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-17 21:53:15,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-17 21:53:15,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-17 21:53:15,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-17 21:53:15,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-17 21:53:15,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-17 21:53:15,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-17 21:53:15,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-17 21:53:15,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-17 21:53:15,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-17 21:53:15,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-17 21:53:15,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-17 21:53:15,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-17 21:53:15,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-17 21:53:15,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-17 21:53:15,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-17 21:53:15,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-17 21:53:15,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-17 21:53:15,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-17 21:53:15,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-17 21:53:15,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-17 21:53:15,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-17 21:53:15,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-17 21:53:15,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-17 21:53:15,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-17 21:53:15,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-17 21:53:15,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-17 21:53:15,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-17 21:53:15,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-17 21:53:15,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-17 21:53:15,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-17 21:53:15,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-17 21:53:15,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-17 21:53:15,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-17 21:53:15,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-17 21:53:15,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-17 21:53:15,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-17 21:53:15,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-17 21:53:15,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-17 21:53:15,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-17 21:53:15,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-17 21:53:15,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-17 21:53:15,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-17 21:53:15,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-17 21:53:15,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-17 21:53:15,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-17 21:53:15,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-17 21:53:15,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-17 21:53:15,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-17 21:53:15,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-17 21:53:15,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-17 21:53:15,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-17 21:53:15,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-17 21:53:15,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-17 21:53:15,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-17 21:53:15,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-17 21:53:15,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-17 21:53:15,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-17 21:53:15,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-17 21:53:15,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-17 21:53:15,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-17 21:53:15,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-17 21:53:15,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-17 21:53:15,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-17 21:53:15,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-17 21:53:15,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-17 21:53:15,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-17 21:53:15,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-17 21:53:15,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-17 21:53:15,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-17 21:53:15,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-17 21:53:15,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-17 21:53:15,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-17 21:53:15,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-17 21:53:15,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-17 21:53:15,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-17 21:53:15,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-17 21:53:15,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-17 21:53:15,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-17 21:53:15,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-17 21:53:15,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-17 21:53:15,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-17 21:53:15,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-17 21:53:15,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-17 21:53:15,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-17 21:53:15,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-17 21:53:15,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-17 21:53:15,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-17 21:53:15,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-17 21:53:15,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-17 21:53:15,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-17 21:53:15,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-17 21:53:15,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-17 21:53:15,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-17 21:53:15,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-17 21:53:15,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-17 21:53:15,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-17 21:53:15,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-17 21:53:15,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-17 21:53:15,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-17 21:53:15,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-17 21:53:15,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-17 21:53:15,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-17 21:53:15,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-17 21:53:15,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-17 21:53:15,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-17 21:53:15,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-17 21:53:15,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-17 21:53:15,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-17 21:53:15,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-17 21:53:15,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-17 21:53:15,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-17 21:53:15,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-17 21:53:15,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-17 21:53:15,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-17 21:53:15,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-17 21:53:15,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-17 21:53:15,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-17 21:53:15,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-17 21:53:15,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-17 21:53:15,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-17 21:53:15,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-17 21:53:15,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-17 21:53:15,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-17 21:53:15,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-17 21:53:15,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-17 21:53:15,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-17 21:53:15,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-17 21:53:15,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-17 21:53:15,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-17 21:53:15,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-17 21:53:15,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-17 21:53:15,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-17 21:53:15,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-17 21:53:15,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-17 21:53:15,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-17 21:53:15,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-17 21:53:15,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-17 21:53:15,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-17 21:53:15,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-17 21:53:15,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-17 21:53:15,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-17 21:53:15,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-17 21:53:15,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-17 21:53:15,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-17 21:53:15,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-17 21:53:15,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-17 21:53:15,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-17 21:53:15,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-17 21:53:15,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-17 21:53:15,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-17 21:53:15,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-17 21:53:15,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-17 21:53:15,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-17 21:53:15,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-17 21:53:15,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-17 21:53:15,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-17 21:53:15,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-17 21:53:15,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-17 21:53:15,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-17 21:53:15,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-17 21:53:15,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-17 21:53:15,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-17 21:53:15,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-17 21:53:15,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-17 21:53:15,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-17 21:53:15,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-17 21:53:15,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-17 21:53:15,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-17 21:53:15,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-17 21:53:15,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-17 21:53:15,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-17 21:53:15,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-17 21:53:15,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-17 21:53:15,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-17 21:53:15,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-17 21:53:15,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-17 21:53:15,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-17 21:53:15,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-17 21:53:15,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-17 21:53:15,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-17 21:53:15,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-17 21:53:15,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-17 21:53:15,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-17 21:53:15,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-17 21:53:15,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-17 21:53:15,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-17 21:53:15,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-17 21:53:15,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-17 21:53:15,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-17 21:53:15,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-17 21:53:15,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-17 21:53:15,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-17 21:53:15,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-17 21:53:15,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-17 21:53:15,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-17 21:53:15,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-17 21:53:15,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-17 21:53:15,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-17 21:53:15,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-17 21:53:15,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-17 21:53:15,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-17 21:53:15,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-17 21:53:15,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-17 21:53:15,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-17 21:53:15,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-17 21:53:15,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-17 21:53:15,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-17 21:53:15,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-17 21:53:15,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-17 21:53:15,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-17 21:53:15,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-17 21:53:15,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-17 21:53:15,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-17 21:53:15,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-17 21:53:15,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-17 21:53:15,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-17 21:53:15,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-17 21:53:15,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-17 21:53:15,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-17 21:53:15,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-17 21:53:15,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-17 21:53:15,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-17 21:53:15,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-17 21:53:15,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-17 21:53:15,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-17 21:53:15,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-17 21:53:15,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-17 21:53:15,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-17 21:53:15,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-17 21:53:15,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-17 21:53:15,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-17 21:53:15,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-17 21:53:15,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-17 21:53:15,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-17 21:53:15,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-17 21:53:15,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-17 21:53:15,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-17 21:53:15,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-17 21:53:15,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-17 21:53:15,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-17 21:53:15,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-17 21:53:15,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-17 21:53:15,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-17 21:53:15,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-17 21:53:15,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-17 21:53:15,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-17 21:53:15,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-17 21:53:15,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-17 21:53:15,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-17 21:53:15,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-17 21:53:15,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-17 21:53:15,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-17 21:53:15,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-17 21:53:15,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-17 21:53:15,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-17 21:53:15,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-17 21:53:15,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-17 21:53:15,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-17 21:53:15,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-17 21:53:15,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-17 21:53:15,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-17 21:53:15,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-17 21:53:15,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-17 21:53:15,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-17 21:53:15,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-17 21:53:15,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-17 21:53:15,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-17 21:53:15,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-17 21:53:15,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-17 21:53:15,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-17 21:53:15,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-17 21:53:15,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-17 21:53:15,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-17 21:53:15,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-17 21:53:15,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-17 21:53:15,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-17 21:53:15,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-17 21:53:15,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-17 21:53:15,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-17 21:53:15,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-17 21:53:15,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-17 21:53:15,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-17 21:53:15,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-17 21:53:15,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-17 21:53:15,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-17 21:53:15,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-17 21:53:15,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-17 21:53:15,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-17 21:53:15,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-17 21:53:15,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-17 21:53:15,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-17 21:53:15,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-17 21:53:15,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-17 21:53:15,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-17 21:53:15,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-17 21:53:15,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-17 21:53:15,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-17 21:53:15,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-17 21:53:15,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-17 21:53:15,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-17 21:53:15,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-17 21:53:15,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-17 21:53:15,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-17 21:53:15,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-17 21:53:15,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-17 21:53:15,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-17 21:53:15,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-17 21:53:15,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-17 21:53:15,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-17 21:53:15,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-17 21:53:15,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-17 21:53:15,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-17 21:53:15,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-17 21:53:15,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-17 21:53:15,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-17 21:53:15,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-17 21:53:15,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-17 21:53:15,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-17 21:53:15,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-17 21:53:15,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-17 21:53:15,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-17 21:53:15,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-17 21:53:15,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-17 21:53:15,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-17 21:53:15,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-17 21:53:15,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-17 21:53:15,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-17 21:53:15,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-17 21:53:15,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-17 21:53:15,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-17 21:53:15,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-17 21:53:15,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-17 21:53:15,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-17 21:53:15,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-17 21:53:15,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-17 21:53:15,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-17 21:53:15,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-17 21:53:15,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-17 21:53:15,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-17 21:53:15,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-17 21:53:15,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-17 21:53:15,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-17 21:53:15,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-17 21:53:15,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-17 21:53:15,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-17 21:53:15,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-17 21:53:15,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-17 21:53:15,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:15,020 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table37) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:15,020 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table38
2023-07-17 21:53:15,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv871358531=369, srv64697211=312, srv653261481=314, srv1778141916=154, srv716510755=323, srv372169288=255, srv568235512=298, srv710229516=322, srv537137712=293, srv1682791519=131, srv642353994=311, srv1046656068=13, srv993792848=391, srv1202667070=39, srv99567927=392, srv1607947050=111, srv1677371877=129, srv1763526149=150, srv1763378353=149, srv531263272=289, srv448398842=270, srv802808934=348, srv77960001=340, srv453521623=271, srv162773041=114, srv563606057=295, srv1659238910=122, srv1279307656=55, srv1914255334=183, srv1296605582=61, srv2131597846=222, srv1375359355=72, srv1405269336=79, srv175680261=147, srv282211488=242, srv1412891098=82, srv375712549=257, srv191234370=182, srv1574132168=106, srv1853511149=168, srv617306884=307, srv268601623=238, srv1400099806=78, srv477381292=275, srv1279442050=56, srv535853198=292, srv1767480590=152, srv2100700333=211, srv1187847151=37, srv791064637=345, srv74478935=330, srv1206084762=41, srv1497856295=97, srv897884865=377, srv398014971=261, srv786136704=342, srv1429879791=86, srv1201763981=38, srv1415213844=84, srv302220908=243, srv156683359=105, srv1974497084=192, srv535358845=291, srv627763604=308, srv732106437=326, srv1679724304=130, srv576770232=299, srv478480013=276, srv1237250370=47, srv1169018295=34, srv32320833=248, srv594880186=304, srv216306370=225, srv656484240=315, srv818754908=354, srv1321058011=63, srv1256345927=52, srv1670847243=126, srv1515243164=99, srv1781378955=156, srv508388209=278, srv1910886192=180, srv1718898730=139, srv772274482=337, srv1433624807=87, srv848605385=359, srv2107957639=212, srv270591905=240, srv2126706298=219, srv2080681743=209, srv1683990934=132, srv11526364=28, srv761020484=334, srv1720507603=141, srv266276730=236, srv935213051=386, srv923440665=383, srv1911104834=181, srv1944131651=187, srv1162841146=30, srv1921230216=185, srv319459319=247, srv1168022226=33, srv57689659=300, srv716533901=324, srv1255156178=50, srv441379967=267, srv806979625=350, srv788255577=344, srv976533744=389, srv1317853355=62, srv1491073587=96, srv777865249=339, srv2130226580=221, srv873230355=370, srv971370780=388, srv2008207413=197, srv989150800=390, srv737980208=328, srv862088563=363, srv1716783669=138, srv1801293056=160, srv1363984373=68, srv515711115=282, srv1378945327=75, srv17002515=136, srv853498273=361, srv1825292480=165, srv2124576425=217, srv1889349340=175, srv527691188=286, srv1226737728=44, srv1781498156=157, srv104267960=11, srv1663644309=124, srv1672213768=127, srv740402944=329, srv555807163=294, srv566277037=296, srv734882045=327, srv1143683685=27, srv1021400966=5, srv694407347=319, srv1626790310=113, srv303328507=244, srv1869166689=171, srv781623755=341, srv40741117=264, srv1958265988=190, srv592380483=303, srv483565354=277, srv1531731329=100, srv359746409=253, srv1271131029=54, srv1007512250=2, srv1783696565=158, srv1284150263=57, srv1648846971=118, srv120365207=40, srv263085176=235, srv535080964=290, srv824739010=357, srv744793832=331, srv1073394883=18, srv1113186104=23, srv1370321362=69, srv328204461=249, srv1604342762=109, srv266460489=237, srv313806624=245, srv1473408823=93, srv865692144=366, srv42814401=265, srv104065318=10, srv1599236554=108, srv1476834435=94, srv1673452142=128, srv716892727=325, srv1501773847=98, srv791504502=346, srv367902453=254, srv254349567=232, srv2126102976=218, srv252714068=231, srv916506189=380, srv687320190=318, srv1000433998=0, srv51396503=281, srv648464134=313, srv908419423=379, srv204022732=200, srv1901650254=177, srv200342397=196, srv765841762=335, srv1849125656=167, srv235281774=226, srv2137298641=224, srv517347076=283, srv1687711069=135, srv800105834=347, srv1609917009=112, srv1038797815=9, srv863216619=365, srv921796978=382, srv895924009=376, srv319002955=246, srv611122413=305, srv1942590787=186, srv529333113=288, srv1053973741=14, srv1988512138=194, srv1037112526=8, srv442327402=268, srv2062351281=204, srv1240518778=48, srv471289019=274, srv1857090224=170, srv1543025253=101, srv1915241294=184, srv238420451=228, srv1747796150=145, srv1101668258=21, srv1437034663=88, srv1173449481=35, srv582652595=301, srv1739043021=144, srv1733173130=143, srv465824154=272, srv14463216=91, srv1720161153=140, srv1549403995=102, srv235920151=227, srv1909060246=179, srv527988350=287, srv1801762669=161, srv89501442=375, srv442994824=269, srv1414012241=83, srv165153258=121, srv1766333515=151, srv2063438865=205, srv1071671801=17, srv1638570398=116, srv1035353226=7, srv1856921753=169, srv1887444158=173, srv1897306674=176, srv1255718022=51, srv1260078897=53, srv1372945218=70, srv1163715139=31, srv175471358=146, srv1558656747=104, srv1463869996=92, srv124825865=49, srv1142495625=26, srv1397803774=77, srv1644508836=117, srv1807320536=162, srv1165273546=32, srv1650978005=120, srv1374260725=71, srv2065239646=206, srv1685737274=134, srv878340336=371, srv329463090=250, srv2112675912=213, srv1378293943=74, srv787532288=343, srv1292867420=59, srv519831391=285, srv1002018470=1, srv822141051=356, srv1229740495=45, srv706370370=321, srv255741565=233, srv1177018836=36, srv1223505925=43, srv745532463=332, srv1820836786=163, srv2127145828=220, srv2124524081=216, srv665150476=316, srv2132621880=223, srv2051928856=203, srv1903063797=178, srv881186303=373, srv1758974023=148, srv270549378=239, srv2014789268=198, srv1663469360=123, srv1331983035=65, srv1768940632=153, srv2084732799=210, srv1043044287=12, srv630246195=309, srv86319792=364, srv37305654=256, srv1650394019=119, srv1888093001=174, srv512441512=280, srv813969264=352, srv277288989=241, srv2017714321=199, srv1410469782=81, srv751917673=333, srv1443060804=89, srv1997063872=195, srv404426071=263, srv1443287861=90, srv695697141=320, srv636958174=310, srv1105584096=22, srv583005569=302, srv92523166=384, srv330226906=251, srv1684865692=133, srv381463497=258, srv567942525=297, srv1010403208=3, srv881516937=374, srv140693587=80, srv1872213858=172, srv262210172=234, srv846799674=358, srv851169364=360, srv880017865=372, srv129190288=58, srv401606217=262, srv669535820=317, srv1325384866=64, srv1377673856=73, srv1416276025=85, srv430431276=266, srv81513922=353, srv2044458062=201, srv2118166427=214, srv1665530216=125, srv2045587532=202, srv1824773168=164, srv2071913725=208, srv1295499145=60, srv1780304939=155, srv612277490=306, srv102508625=6, srv1637539828=115, srv820424989=355, srv50966795=279, srv1950402166=188, srv1207208580=42, srv1057648579=16, srv1084295726=20, srv39165764=260, srv959379519=387, srv2066402828=207, srv1556810592=103, srv1232731779=46, srv1606144164=110, srv1487275322=95, srv519310224=284, srv775221203=338, srv1079168923=19, srv1957834842=189, srv866525142=367, srv243907419=229, srv248553307=230, srv344122075=252, srv467461515=273, srv805609280=349, srv1018507425=4, srv1827511993=166, srv1704639485=137, srv855754935=362, srv1057024901=15, srv1116429721=24, srv927375731=385, srv1383836323=76, srv1584407048=107, srv809779157=351, srv1786622589=159, srv869541705=368, srv1123072042=25, srv1726136626=142, srv135800579=67, srv1958676591=191, srv390748718=259, srv907223095=378, srv76871917=336, srv1160170031=29, srv2119727728=215, srv918100507=381, srv1352063642=66, srv1975716907=193} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:15,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:15,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:15,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:15,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:15,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:15,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:15,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:15,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:15,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:15,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:15,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-17 21:53:15,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-17 21:53:15,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-17 21:53:15,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-17 21:53:15,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-17 21:53:15,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-17 21:53:15,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-17 21:53:15,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-17 21:53:15,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-17 21:53:15,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-17 21:53:15,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-17 21:53:15,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-17 21:53:15,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-17 21:53:15,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-17 21:53:15,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-17 21:53:15,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-17 21:53:15,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-17 21:53:15,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-17 21:53:15,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-17 21:53:15,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-17 21:53:15,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-17 21:53:15,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-17 21:53:15,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-17 21:53:15,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-17 21:53:15,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-17 21:53:15,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-17 21:53:15,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-17 21:53:15,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-17 21:53:15,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-17 21:53:15,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-17 21:53:15,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-17 21:53:15,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-17 21:53:15,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-17 21:53:15,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-17 21:53:15,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-17 21:53:15,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-17 21:53:15,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-17 21:53:15,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-17 21:53:15,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-17 21:53:15,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-17 21:53:15,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-17 21:53:15,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-17 21:53:15,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-17 21:53:15,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-17 21:53:15,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-17 21:53:15,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-17 21:53:15,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-17 21:53:15,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-17 21:53:15,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-17 21:53:15,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-17 21:53:15,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-17 21:53:15,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-17 21:53:15,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-17 21:53:15,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-17 21:53:15,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-17 21:53:15,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-17 21:53:15,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-17 21:53:15,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-17 21:53:15,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-17 21:53:15,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-17 21:53:15,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-17 21:53:15,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-17 21:53:15,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-17 21:53:15,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-17 21:53:15,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-17 21:53:15,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-17 21:53:15,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-17 21:53:15,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-17 21:53:15,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-17 21:53:15,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-17 21:53:15,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-17 21:53:15,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-17 21:53:15,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-17 21:53:15,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-17 21:53:15,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-17 21:53:15,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-17 21:53:15,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-17 21:53:15,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-17 21:53:15,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-17 21:53:15,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-17 21:53:15,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-17 21:53:15,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-17 21:53:15,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-17 21:53:15,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-17 21:53:15,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-17 21:53:15,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-17 21:53:15,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-17 21:53:15,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-17 21:53:15,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-17 21:53:15,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-17 21:53:15,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-17 21:53:15,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-17 21:53:15,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-17 21:53:15,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-17 21:53:15,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-17 21:53:15,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-17 21:53:15,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-17 21:53:15,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-17 21:53:15,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-17 21:53:15,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-17 21:53:15,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-17 21:53:15,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-17 21:53:15,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-17 21:53:15,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-17 21:53:15,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-17 21:53:15,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-17 21:53:15,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-17 21:53:15,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-17 21:53:15,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-17 21:53:15,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-17 21:53:15,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-17 21:53:15,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-17 21:53:15,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-17 21:53:15,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-17 21:53:15,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-17 21:53:15,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-17 21:53:15,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-17 21:53:15,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-17 21:53:15,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-17 21:53:15,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-17 21:53:15,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-17 21:53:15,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-17 21:53:15,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-17 21:53:15,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-17 21:53:15,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-17 21:53:15,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-17 21:53:15,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-17 21:53:15,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-17 21:53:15,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-17 21:53:15,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-17 21:53:15,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-17 21:53:15,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-17 21:53:15,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-17 21:53:15,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-17 21:53:15,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-17 21:53:15,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-17 21:53:15,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-17 21:53:15,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-17 21:53:15,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-17 21:53:15,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-17 21:53:15,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-17 21:53:15,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-17 21:53:15,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-17 21:53:15,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-17 21:53:15,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-17 21:53:15,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-17 21:53:15,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-17 21:53:15,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-17 21:53:15,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-17 21:53:15,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-17 21:53:15,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-17 21:53:15,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-17 21:53:15,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-17 21:53:15,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-17 21:53:15,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-17 21:53:15,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-17 21:53:15,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-17 21:53:15,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-17 21:53:15,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-17 21:53:15,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-17 21:53:15,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-17 21:53:15,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-17 21:53:15,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-17 21:53:15,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-17 21:53:15,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-17 21:53:15,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-17 21:53:15,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-17 21:53:15,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-17 21:53:15,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-17 21:53:15,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-17 21:53:15,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-17 21:53:15,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-17 21:53:15,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-17 21:53:15,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-17 21:53:15,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-17 21:53:15,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-17 21:53:15,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-17 21:53:15,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-17 21:53:15,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-17 21:53:15,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-17 21:53:15,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-17 21:53:15,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-17 21:53:15,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-17 21:53:15,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-17 21:53:15,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-17 21:53:15,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-17 21:53:15,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-17 21:53:15,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-17 21:53:15,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-17 21:53:15,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-17 21:53:15,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-17 21:53:15,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-17 21:53:15,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-17 21:53:15,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-17 21:53:15,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-17 21:53:15,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-17 21:53:15,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-17 21:53:15,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-17 21:53:15,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-17 21:53:15,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-17 21:53:15,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-17 21:53:15,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-17 21:53:15,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-17 21:53:15,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-17 21:53:15,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-17 21:53:15,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-17 21:53:15,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-17 21:53:15,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-17 21:53:15,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-17 21:53:15,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-17 21:53:15,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-17 21:53:15,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-17 21:53:15,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-17 21:53:15,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-17 21:53:15,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-17 21:53:15,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-17 21:53:15,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-17 21:53:15,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-17 21:53:15,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-17 21:53:15,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-17 21:53:15,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-17 21:53:15,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-17 21:53:15,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-17 21:53:15,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-17 21:53:15,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-17 21:53:15,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-17 21:53:15,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-17 21:53:15,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-17 21:53:15,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-17 21:53:15,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-17 21:53:15,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-17 21:53:15,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-17 21:53:15,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-17 21:53:15,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-17 21:53:15,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-17 21:53:15,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-17 21:53:15,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-17 21:53:15,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-17 21:53:15,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-17 21:53:15,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-17 21:53:15,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-17 21:53:15,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-17 21:53:15,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-17 21:53:15,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-17 21:53:15,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-17 21:53:15,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-17 21:53:15,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-17 21:53:15,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-17 21:53:15,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-17 21:53:15,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-17 21:53:15,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-17 21:53:15,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-17 21:53:15,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-17 21:53:15,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-17 21:53:15,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-17 21:53:15,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-17 21:53:15,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-17 21:53:15,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-17 21:53:15,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-17 21:53:15,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-17 21:53:15,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-17 21:53:15,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-17 21:53:15,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-17 21:53:15,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-17 21:53:15,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-17 21:53:15,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-17 21:53:15,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-17 21:53:15,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-17 21:53:15,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-17 21:53:15,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-17 21:53:15,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-17 21:53:15,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-17 21:53:15,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-17 21:53:15,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-17 21:53:15,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-17 21:53:15,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-17 21:53:15,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-17 21:53:15,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-17 21:53:15,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-17 21:53:15,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-17 21:53:15,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-17 21:53:15,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-17 21:53:15,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-17 21:53:15,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-17 21:53:15,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-17 21:53:15,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-17 21:53:15,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-17 21:53:15,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-17 21:53:15,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-17 21:53:15,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-17 21:53:15,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-17 21:53:15,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-17 21:53:15,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-17 21:53:15,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-17 21:53:15,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-17 21:53:15,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-17 21:53:15,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-17 21:53:15,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-17 21:53:15,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-17 21:53:15,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-17 21:53:15,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-17 21:53:15,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-17 21:53:15,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-17 21:53:15,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-17 21:53:15,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-17 21:53:15,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-17 21:53:15,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-17 21:53:15,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-17 21:53:15,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-17 21:53:15,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-17 21:53:15,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-17 21:53:15,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-17 21:53:15,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-17 21:53:15,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-17 21:53:15,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-17 21:53:15,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-17 21:53:15,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-17 21:53:15,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-17 21:53:15,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-17 21:53:15,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-17 21:53:15,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-17 21:53:15,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-17 21:53:15,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-17 21:53:15,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-17 21:53:15,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-17 21:53:15,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-17 21:53:15,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-17 21:53:15,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-17 21:53:15,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-17 21:53:15,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-17 21:53:15,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-17 21:53:15,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-17 21:53:15,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-17 21:53:15,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-17 21:53:15,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-17 21:53:15,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-17 21:53:15,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-17 21:53:15,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-17 21:53:15,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-17 21:53:15,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-17 21:53:15,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-17 21:53:15,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-17 21:53:15,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-17 21:53:15,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-17 21:53:15,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-17 21:53:15,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-17 21:53:15,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-17 21:53:15,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-17 21:53:15,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-17 21:53:15,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-17 21:53:15,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-17 21:53:15,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-17 21:53:15,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-17 21:53:15,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-17 21:53:15,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-17 21:53:15,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-17 21:53:15,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-17 21:53:15,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-17 21:53:15,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-17 21:53:15,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-17 21:53:15,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-17 21:53:15,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-17 21:53:15,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-17 21:53:15,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-17 21:53:15,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-17 21:53:15,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-17 21:53:15,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-17 21:53:15,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-17 21:53:15,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-17 21:53:15,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-17 21:53:15,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-17 21:53:15,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-17 21:53:15,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-17 21:53:15,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-17 21:53:15,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-17 21:53:15,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-17 21:53:15,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-17 21:53:15,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-17 21:53:15,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-17 21:53:15,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-17 21:53:15,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-17 21:53:15,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-17 21:53:15,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-17 21:53:15,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:15,035 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table38) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:15,035 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table39
2023-07-17 21:53:15,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv871358531=369, srv64697211=312, srv653261481=314, srv1778141916=154, srv716510755=323, srv372169288=255, srv568235512=298, srv710229516=322, srv537137712=293, srv1682791519=131, srv642353994=311, srv1046656068=13, srv993792848=391, srv1202667070=39, srv99567927=392, srv1607947050=111, srv1677371877=129, srv1763526149=150, srv1763378353=149, srv531263272=289, srv448398842=270, srv802808934=348, srv77960001=340, srv453521623=271, srv162773041=114, srv563606057=295, srv1659238910=122, srv1279307656=55, srv1914255334=183, srv1296605582=61, srv2131597846=222, srv1375359355=72, srv1405269336=79, srv175680261=147, srv282211488=242, srv1412891098=82, srv375712549=257, srv191234370=182, srv1574132168=106, srv1853511149=168, srv617306884=307, srv268601623=238, srv1400099806=78, srv477381292=275, srv1279442050=56, srv535853198=292, srv1767480590=152, srv2100700333=211, srv1187847151=37, srv791064637=345, srv74478935=330, srv1206084762=41, srv1497856295=97, srv897884865=377, srv398014971=261, srv786136704=342, srv1429879791=86, srv1201763981=38, srv1415213844=84, srv302220908=243, srv156683359=105, srv1974497084=192, srv535358845=291, srv627763604=308, srv732106437=326, srv1679724304=130, srv576770232=299, srv478480013=276, srv1237250370=47, srv1169018295=34, srv32320833=248, srv594880186=304, srv216306370=225, srv656484240=315, srv818754908=354, srv1321058011=63, srv1256345927=52, srv1670847243=126, srv1515243164=99, srv1781378955=156, srv508388209=278, srv1910886192=180, srv1718898730=139, srv772274482=337, srv1433624807=87, srv848605385=359, srv2107957639=212, srv270591905=240, srv2126706298=219, srv2080681743=209, srv1683990934=132, srv11526364=28, srv761020484=334, srv1720507603=141, srv266276730=236, srv935213051=386, srv923440665=383, srv1911104834=181, srv1944131651=187, srv1162841146=30, srv1921230216=185, srv319459319=247, srv1168022226=33, srv57689659=300, srv716533901=324, srv1255156178=50, srv441379967=267, srv806979625=350, srv788255577=344, srv976533744=389, srv1317853355=62, srv1491073587=96, srv777865249=339, srv2130226580=221, srv873230355=370, srv971370780=388, srv2008207413=197, srv989150800=390, srv737980208=328, srv862088563=363, srv1716783669=138, srv1801293056=160, srv1363984373=68, srv515711115=282, srv1378945327=75, srv17002515=136, srv853498273=361, srv1825292480=165, srv2124576425=217, srv1889349340=175, srv527691188=286, srv1226737728=44, srv1781498156=157, srv104267960=11, srv1663644309=124, srv1672213768=127, srv740402944=329, srv555807163=294, srv566277037=296, srv734882045=327, srv1143683685=27, srv1021400966=5, srv694407347=319, srv1626790310=113, srv303328507=244, srv1869166689=171, srv781623755=341, srv40741117=264, srv1958265988=190, srv592380483=303, srv483565354=277, srv1531731329=100, srv359746409=253, srv1271131029=54, srv1007512250=2, srv1783696565=158, srv1284150263=57, srv1648846971=118, srv120365207=40, srv263085176=235, srv535080964=290, srv824739010=357, srv744793832=331, srv1073394883=18, srv1113186104=23, srv1370321362=69, srv328204461=249, srv1604342762=109, srv266460489=237, srv313806624=245, srv1473408823=93, srv865692144=366, srv42814401=265, srv104065318=10, srv1599236554=108, srv1476834435=94, srv1673452142=128, srv716892727=325, srv1501773847=98, srv791504502=346, srv367902453=254, srv254349567=232, srv2126102976=218, srv252714068=231, srv916506189=380, srv687320190=318, srv1000433998=0, srv51396503=281, srv648464134=313, srv908419423=379, srv204022732=200, srv1901650254=177, srv200342397=196, srv765841762=335, srv1849125656=167, srv235281774=226, srv2137298641=224, srv517347076=283, srv1687711069=135, srv800105834=347, srv1609917009=112, srv1038797815=9, srv863216619=365, srv921796978=382, srv895924009=376, srv319002955=246, srv611122413=305, srv1942590787=186, srv529333113=288, srv1053973741=14, srv1988512138=194, srv1037112526=8, srv442327402=268, srv2062351281=204, srv1240518778=48, srv471289019=274, srv1857090224=170, srv1543025253=101, srv1915241294=184, srv238420451=228, srv1747796150=145, srv1101668258=21, srv1437034663=88, srv1173449481=35, srv582652595=301, srv1739043021=144, srv1733173130=143, srv465824154=272, srv14463216=91, srv1720161153=140, srv1549403995=102, srv235920151=227, srv1909060246=179, srv527988350=287, srv1801762669=161, srv89501442=375, srv442994824=269, srv1414012241=83, srv165153258=121, srv1766333515=151, srv2063438865=205, srv1071671801=17, srv1638570398=116, srv1035353226=7, srv1856921753=169, srv1887444158=173, srv1897306674=176, srv1255718022=51, srv1260078897=53, srv1372945218=70, srv1163715139=31, srv175471358=146, srv1558656747=104, srv1463869996=92, srv124825865=49, srv1142495625=26, srv1397803774=77, srv1644508836=117, srv1807320536=162, srv1165273546=32, srv1650978005=120, srv1374260725=71, srv2065239646=206, srv1685737274=134, srv878340336=371, srv329463090=250, srv2112675912=213, srv1378293943=74, srv787532288=343, srv1292867420=59, srv519831391=285, srv1002018470=1, srv822141051=356, srv1229740495=45, srv706370370=321, srv255741565=233, srv1177018836=36, srv1223505925=43, srv745532463=332, srv1820836786=163, srv2127145828=220, srv2124524081=216, srv665150476=316, srv2132621880=223, srv2051928856=203, srv1903063797=178, srv881186303=373, srv1758974023=148, srv270549378=239, srv2014789268=198, srv1663469360=123, srv1331983035=65, srv1768940632=153, srv2084732799=210, srv1043044287=12, srv630246195=309, srv86319792=364, srv37305654=256, srv1650394019=119, srv1888093001=174, srv512441512=280, srv813969264=352, srv277288989=241, srv2017714321=199, srv1410469782=81, srv751917673=333, srv1443060804=89, srv1997063872=195, srv404426071=263, srv1443287861=90, srv695697141=320, srv636958174=310, srv1105584096=22, srv583005569=302, srv92523166=384, srv330226906=251, srv1684865692=133, srv381463497=258, srv567942525=297, srv1010403208=3, srv881516937=374, srv140693587=80, srv1872213858=172, srv262210172=234, srv846799674=358, srv851169364=360, srv880017865=372, srv129190288=58, srv401606217=262, srv669535820=317, srv1325384866=64, srv1377673856=73, srv1416276025=85, srv430431276=266, srv81513922=353, srv2044458062=201, srv2118166427=214, srv1665530216=125, srv2045587532=202, srv1824773168=164, srv2071913725=208, srv1295499145=60, srv1780304939=155, srv612277490=306, srv102508625=6, srv1637539828=115, srv820424989=355, srv50966795=279, srv1950402166=188, srv1207208580=42, srv1057648579=16, srv1084295726=20, srv39165764=260, srv959379519=387, srv2066402828=207, srv1556810592=103, srv1232731779=46, srv1606144164=110, srv1487275322=95, srv519310224=284, srv775221203=338, srv1079168923=19, srv1957834842=189, srv866525142=367, srv243907419=229, srv248553307=230, srv344122075=252, srv467461515=273, srv805609280=349, srv1018507425=4, srv1827511993=166, srv1704639485=137, srv855754935=362, srv1057024901=15, srv1116429721=24, srv927375731=385, srv1383836323=76, srv1584407048=107, srv809779157=351, srv1786622589=159, srv869541705=368, srv1123072042=25, srv1726136626=142, srv135800579=67, srv1958676591=191, srv390748718=259, srv907223095=378, srv76871917=336, srv1160170031=29, srv2119727728=215, srv918100507=381, srv1352063642=66, srv1975716907=193} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:15,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:15,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:15,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:15,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:15,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:15,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:15,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:15,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:15,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:15,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:15,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-17 21:53:15,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-17 21:53:15,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-17 21:53:15,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-17 21:53:15,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-17 21:53:15,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-17 21:53:15,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-17 21:53:15,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-17 21:53:15,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-17 21:53:15,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-17 21:53:15,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-17 21:53:15,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-17 21:53:15,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-17 21:53:15,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-17 21:53:15,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-17 21:53:15,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-17 21:53:15,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-17 21:53:15,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-17 21:53:15,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-17 21:53:15,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-17 21:53:15,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-17 21:53:15,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-17 21:53:15,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-17 21:53:15,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-17 21:53:15,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-17 21:53:15,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-17 21:53:15,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-17 21:53:15,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-17 21:53:15,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-17 21:53:15,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-17 21:53:15,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-17 21:53:15,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-17 21:53:15,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-17 21:53:15,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-17 21:53:15,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-17 21:53:15,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-17 21:53:15,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-17 21:53:15,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-17 21:53:15,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-17 21:53:15,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-17 21:53:15,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-17 21:53:15,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-17 21:53:15,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-17 21:53:15,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-17 21:53:15,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-17 21:53:15,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-17 21:53:15,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-17 21:53:15,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-17 21:53:15,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-17 21:53:15,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-17 21:53:15,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-17 21:53:15,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-17 21:53:15,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-17 21:53:15,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-17 21:53:15,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-17 21:53:15,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-17 21:53:15,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-17 21:53:15,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-17 21:53:15,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-17 21:53:15,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-17 21:53:15,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-17 21:53:15,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-17 21:53:15,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-17 21:53:15,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-17 21:53:15,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-17 21:53:15,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-17 21:53:15,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-17 21:53:15,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-17 21:53:15,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-17 21:53:15,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-17 21:53:15,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-17 21:53:15,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-17 21:53:15,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-17 21:53:15,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-17 21:53:15,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-17 21:53:15,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-17 21:53:15,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-17 21:53:15,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-17 21:53:15,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-17 21:53:15,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-17 21:53:15,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-17 21:53:15,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-17 21:53:15,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-17 21:53:15,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-17 21:53:15,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-17 21:53:15,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-17 21:53:15,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-17 21:53:15,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-17 21:53:15,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-17 21:53:15,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-17 21:53:15,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-17 21:53:15,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-17 21:53:15,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-17 21:53:15,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-17 21:53:15,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-17 21:53:15,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-17 21:53:15,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-17 21:53:15,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-17 21:53:15,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-17 21:53:15,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-17 21:53:15,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-17 21:53:15,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-17 21:53:15,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-17 21:53:15,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-17 21:53:15,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-17 21:53:15,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-17 21:53:15,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-17 21:53:15,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-17 21:53:15,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-17 21:53:15,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-17 21:53:15,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-17 21:53:15,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-17 21:53:15,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-17 21:53:15,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-17 21:53:15,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-17 21:53:15,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-17 21:53:15,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-17 21:53:15,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-17 21:53:15,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-17 21:53:15,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-17 21:53:15,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-17 21:53:15,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-17 21:53:15,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-17 21:53:15,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-17 21:53:15,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-17 21:53:15,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-17 21:53:15,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-17 21:53:15,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-17 21:53:15,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-17 21:53:15,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-17 21:53:15,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-17 21:53:15,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-17 21:53:15,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-17 21:53:15,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-17 21:53:15,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-17 21:53:15,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-17 21:53:15,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-17 21:53:15,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-17 21:53:15,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-17 21:53:15,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-17 21:53:15,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-17 21:53:15,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-17 21:53:15,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-17 21:53:15,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-17 21:53:15,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-17 21:53:15,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-17 21:53:15,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-17 21:53:15,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-17 21:53:15,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-17 21:53:15,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-17 21:53:15,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-17 21:53:15,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-17 21:53:15,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-17 21:53:15,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-17 21:53:15,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-17 21:53:15,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-17 21:53:15,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-17 21:53:15,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-17 21:53:15,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-17 21:53:15,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-17 21:53:15,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-17 21:53:15,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-17 21:53:15,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-17 21:53:15,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-17 21:53:15,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-17 21:53:15,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-17 21:53:15,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-17 21:53:15,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-17 21:53:15,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-17 21:53:15,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-17 21:53:15,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-17 21:53:15,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-17 21:53:15,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-17 21:53:15,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-17 21:53:15,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-17 21:53:15,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-17 21:53:15,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-17 21:53:15,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-17 21:53:15,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-17 21:53:15,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-17 21:53:15,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-17 21:53:15,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-17 21:53:15,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-17 21:53:15,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-17 21:53:15,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-17 21:53:15,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-17 21:53:15,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-17 21:53:15,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-17 21:53:15,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-17 21:53:15,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-17 21:53:15,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-17 21:53:15,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-17 21:53:15,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-17 21:53:15,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-17 21:53:15,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-17 21:53:15,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-17 21:53:15,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-17 21:53:15,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-17 21:53:15,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-17 21:53:15,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-17 21:53:15,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-17 21:53:15,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-17 21:53:15,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-17 21:53:15,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-17 21:53:15,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-17 21:53:15,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-17 21:53:15,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-17 21:53:15,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-17 21:53:15,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-17 21:53:15,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-17 21:53:15,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-17 21:53:15,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-17 21:53:15,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-17 21:53:15,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-17 21:53:15,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-17 21:53:15,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-17 21:53:15,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-17 21:53:15,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-17 21:53:15,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-17 21:53:15,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-17 21:53:15,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-17 21:53:15,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-17 21:53:15,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-17 21:53:15,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-17 21:53:15,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-17 21:53:15,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-17 21:53:15,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-17 21:53:15,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-17 21:53:15,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-17 21:53:15,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-17 21:53:15,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-17 21:53:15,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-17 21:53:15,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-17 21:53:15,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-17 21:53:15,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-17 21:53:15,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-17 21:53:15,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-17 21:53:15,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-17 21:53:15,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-17 21:53:15,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-17 21:53:15,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-17 21:53:15,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-17 21:53:15,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-17 21:53:15,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-17 21:53:15,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-17 21:53:15,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-17 21:53:15,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-17 21:53:15,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-17 21:53:15,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-17 21:53:15,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-17 21:53:15,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-17 21:53:15,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-17 21:53:15,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-17 21:53:15,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-17 21:53:15,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-17 21:53:15,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-17 21:53:15,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-17 21:53:15,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-17 21:53:15,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-17 21:53:15,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-17 21:53:15,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-17 21:53:15,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-17 21:53:15,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-17 21:53:15,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-17 21:53:15,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-17 21:53:15,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-17 21:53:15,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-17 21:53:15,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-17 21:53:15,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-17 21:53:15,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-17 21:53:15,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-17 21:53:15,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-17 21:53:15,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-17 21:53:15,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-17 21:53:15,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-17 21:53:15,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-17 21:53:15,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-17 21:53:15,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-17 21:53:15,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-17 21:53:15,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-17 21:53:15,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-17 21:53:15,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-17 21:53:15,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-17 21:53:15,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-17 21:53:15,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-17 21:53:15,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-17 21:53:15,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-17 21:53:15,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-17 21:53:15,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-17 21:53:15,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-17 21:53:15,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-17 21:53:15,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-17 21:53:15,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-17 21:53:15,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-17 21:53:15,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-17 21:53:15,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-17 21:53:15,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-17 21:53:15,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-17 21:53:15,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-17 21:53:15,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-17 21:53:15,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-17 21:53:15,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-17 21:53:15,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-17 21:53:15,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-17 21:53:15,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-17 21:53:15,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-17 21:53:15,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-17 21:53:15,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-17 21:53:15,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-17 21:53:15,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-17 21:53:15,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-17 21:53:15,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-17 21:53:15,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-17 21:53:15,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-17 21:53:15,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-17 21:53:15,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-17 21:53:15,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-17 21:53:15,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-17 21:53:15,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-17 21:53:15,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-17 21:53:15,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-17 21:53:15,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-17 21:53:15,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-17 21:53:15,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-17 21:53:15,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-17 21:53:15,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-17 21:53:15,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-17 21:53:15,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-17 21:53:15,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-17 21:53:15,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-17 21:53:15,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-17 21:53:15,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-17 21:53:15,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-17 21:53:15,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-17 21:53:15,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-17 21:53:15,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-17 21:53:15,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-17 21:53:15,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-17 21:53:15,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-17 21:53:15,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-17 21:53:15,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-17 21:53:15,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-17 21:53:15,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-17 21:53:15,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-17 21:53:15,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-17 21:53:15,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-17 21:53:15,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-17 21:53:15,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-17 21:53:15,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-17 21:53:15,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-17 21:53:15,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-17 21:53:15,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-17 21:53:15,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-17 21:53:15,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-17 21:53:15,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-17 21:53:15,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-17 21:53:15,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-17 21:53:15,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-17 21:53:15,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-17 21:53:15,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-17 21:53:15,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-17 21:53:15,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-17 21:53:15,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-17 21:53:15,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-17 21:53:15,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-17 21:53:15,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-17 21:53:15,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-17 21:53:15,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-17 21:53:15,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-17 21:53:15,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-17 21:53:15,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-17 21:53:15,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-17 21:53:15,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-17 21:53:15,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-17 21:53:15,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-17 21:53:15,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-17 21:53:15,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-17 21:53:15,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-17 21:53:15,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-17 21:53:15,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-17 21:53:15,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-17 21:53:15,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-17 21:53:15,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-17 21:53:15,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:15,050 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table39) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:15,050 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-17 21:53:15,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv871358531=369, srv64697211=312, srv653261481=314, srv1778141916=154, srv716510755=323, srv372169288=255, srv568235512=298, srv710229516=322, srv537137712=293, srv1682791519=131, srv642353994=311, srv1046656068=13, srv993792848=391, srv1202667070=39, srv99567927=392, srv1607947050=111, srv1677371877=129, srv1763526149=150, srv1763378353=149, srv531263272=289, srv448398842=270, srv802808934=348, srv77960001=340, srv453521623=271, srv162773041=114, srv563606057=295, srv1659238910=122, srv1279307656=55, srv1914255334=183, srv1296605582=61, srv2131597846=222, srv1375359355=72, srv1405269336=79, srv175680261=147, srv282211488=242, srv1412891098=82, srv375712549=257, srv191234370=182, srv1574132168=106, srv1853511149=168, srv617306884=307, srv268601623=238, srv1400099806=78, srv477381292=275, srv1279442050=56, srv535853198=292, srv1767480590=152, srv2100700333=211, srv1187847151=37, srv791064637=345, srv74478935=330, srv1206084762=41, srv1497856295=97, srv897884865=377, srv398014971=261, srv786136704=342, srv1429879791=86, srv1201763981=38, srv1415213844=84, srv302220908=243, srv156683359=105, srv1974497084=192, srv535358845=291, srv627763604=308, srv732106437=326, srv1679724304=130, srv576770232=299, srv478480013=276, srv1237250370=47, srv1169018295=34, srv32320833=248, srv594880186=304, srv216306370=225, srv656484240=315, srv818754908=354, srv1321058011=63, srv1256345927=52, srv1670847243=126, srv1515243164=99, srv1781378955=156, srv508388209=278, srv1910886192=180, srv1718898730=139, srv772274482=337, srv1433624807=87, srv848605385=359, srv2107957639=212, srv270591905=240, srv2126706298=219, srv2080681743=209, srv1683990934=132, srv11526364=28, srv761020484=334, srv1720507603=141, srv266276730=236, srv935213051=386, srv923440665=383, srv1911104834=181, srv1944131651=187, srv1162841146=30, srv1921230216=185, srv319459319=247, srv1168022226=33, srv57689659=300, srv716533901=324, srv1255156178=50, srv441379967=267, srv806979625=350, srv788255577=344, srv976533744=389, srv1317853355=62, srv1491073587=96, srv777865249=339, srv2130226580=221, srv873230355=370, srv971370780=388, srv2008207413=197, srv989150800=390, srv737980208=328, srv862088563=363, srv1716783669=138, srv1801293056=160, srv1363984373=68, srv515711115=282, srv1378945327=75, srv17002515=136, srv853498273=361, srv1825292480=165, srv2124576425=217, srv1889349340=175, srv527691188=286, srv1226737728=44, srv1781498156=157, srv104267960=11, srv1663644309=124, srv1672213768=127, srv740402944=329, srv555807163=294, srv566277037=296, srv734882045=327, srv1143683685=27, srv1021400966=5, srv694407347=319, srv1626790310=113, srv303328507=244, srv1869166689=171, srv781623755=341, srv40741117=264, srv1958265988=190, srv592380483=303, srv483565354=277, srv1531731329=100, srv359746409=253, srv1271131029=54, srv1007512250=2, srv1783696565=158, srv1284150263=57, srv1648846971=118, srv120365207=40, srv263085176=235, srv535080964=290, srv824739010=357, srv744793832=331, srv1073394883=18, srv1113186104=23, srv1370321362=69, srv328204461=249, srv1604342762=109, srv266460489=237, srv313806624=245, srv1473408823=93, srv865692144=366, srv42814401=265, srv104065318=10, srv1599236554=108, srv1476834435=94, srv1673452142=128, srv716892727=325, srv1501773847=98, srv791504502=346, srv367902453=254, srv254349567=232, srv2126102976=218, srv252714068=231, srv916506189=380, srv687320190=318, srv1000433998=0, srv51396503=281, srv648464134=313, srv908419423=379, srv204022732=200, srv1901650254=177, srv200342397=196, srv765841762=335, srv1849125656=167, srv235281774=226, srv2137298641=224, srv517347076=283, srv1687711069=135, srv800105834=347, srv1609917009=112, srv1038797815=9, srv863216619=365, srv921796978=382, srv895924009=376, srv319002955=246, srv611122413=305, srv1942590787=186, srv529333113=288, srv1053973741=14, srv1988512138=194, srv1037112526=8, srv442327402=268, srv2062351281=204, srv1240518778=48, srv471289019=274, srv1857090224=170, srv1543025253=101, srv1915241294=184, srv238420451=228, srv1747796150=145, srv1101668258=21, srv1437034663=88, srv1173449481=35, srv582652595=301, srv1739043021=144, srv1733173130=143, srv465824154=272, srv14463216=91, srv1720161153=140, srv1549403995=102, srv235920151=227, srv1909060246=179, srv527988350=287, srv1801762669=161, srv89501442=375, srv442994824=269, srv1414012241=83, srv165153258=121, srv1766333515=151, srv2063438865=205, srv1071671801=17, srv1638570398=116, srv1035353226=7, srv1856921753=169, srv1887444158=173, srv1897306674=176, srv1255718022=51, srv1260078897=53, srv1372945218=70, srv1163715139=31, srv175471358=146, srv1558656747=104, srv1463869996=92, srv124825865=49, srv1142495625=26, srv1397803774=77, srv1644508836=117, srv1807320536=162, srv1165273546=32, srv1650978005=120, srv1374260725=71, srv2065239646=206, srv1685737274=134, srv878340336=371, srv329463090=250, srv2112675912=213, srv1378293943=74, srv787532288=343, srv1292867420=59, srv519831391=285, srv1002018470=1, srv822141051=356, srv1229740495=45, srv706370370=321, srv255741565=233, srv1177018836=36, srv1223505925=43, srv745532463=332, srv1820836786=163, srv2127145828=220, srv2124524081=216, srv665150476=316, srv2132621880=223, srv2051928856=203, srv1903063797=178, srv881186303=373, srv1758974023=148, srv270549378=239, srv2014789268=198, srv1663469360=123, srv1331983035=65, srv1768940632=153, srv2084732799=210, srv1043044287=12, srv630246195=309, srv86319792=364, srv37305654=256, srv1650394019=119, srv1888093001=174, srv512441512=280, srv813969264=352, srv277288989=241, srv2017714321=199, srv1410469782=81, srv751917673=333, srv1443060804=89, srv1997063872=195, srv404426071=263, srv1443287861=90, srv695697141=320, srv636958174=310, srv1105584096=22, srv583005569=302, srv92523166=384, srv330226906=251, srv1684865692=133, srv381463497=258, srv567942525=297, srv1010403208=3, srv881516937=374, srv140693587=80, srv1872213858=172, srv262210172=234, srv846799674=358, srv851169364=360, srv880017865=372, srv129190288=58, srv401606217=262, srv669535820=317, srv1325384866=64, srv1377673856=73, srv1416276025=85, srv430431276=266, srv81513922=353, srv2044458062=201, srv2118166427=214, srv1665530216=125, srv2045587532=202, srv1824773168=164, srv2071913725=208, srv1295499145=60, srv1780304939=155, srv612277490=306, srv102508625=6, srv1637539828=115, srv820424989=355, srv50966795=279, srv1950402166=188, srv1207208580=42, srv1057648579=16, srv1084295726=20, srv39165764=260, srv959379519=387, srv2066402828=207, srv1556810592=103, srv1232731779=46, srv1606144164=110, srv1487275322=95, srv519310224=284, srv775221203=338, srv1079168923=19, srv1957834842=189, srv866525142=367, srv243907419=229, srv248553307=230, srv344122075=252, srv467461515=273, srv805609280=349, srv1018507425=4, srv1827511993=166, srv1704639485=137, srv855754935=362, srv1057024901=15, srv1116429721=24, srv927375731=385, srv1383836323=76, srv1584407048=107, srv809779157=351, srv1786622589=159, srv869541705=368, srv1123072042=25, srv1726136626=142, srv135800579=67, srv1958676591=191, srv390748718=259, srv907223095=378, srv76871917=336, srv1160170031=29, srv2119727728=215, srv918100507=381, srv1352063642=66, srv1975716907=193} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:15,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:15,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:15,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:15,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:15,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:15,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:15,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:15,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:15,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:15,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:15,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-17 21:53:15,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-17 21:53:15,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-17 21:53:15,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-17 21:53:15,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-17 21:53:15,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-17 21:53:15,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-17 21:53:15,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-17 21:53:15,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-17 21:53:15,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-17 21:53:15,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-17 21:53:15,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-17 21:53:15,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-17 21:53:15,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-17 21:53:15,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-17 21:53:15,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-17 21:53:15,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-17 21:53:15,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-17 21:53:15,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-17 21:53:15,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-17 21:53:15,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-17 21:53:15,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-17 21:53:15,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-17 21:53:15,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-17 21:53:15,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-17 21:53:15,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-17 21:53:15,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-17 21:53:15,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-17 21:53:15,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-17 21:53:15,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-17 21:53:15,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-17 21:53:15,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-17 21:53:15,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-17 21:53:15,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-17 21:53:15,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-17 21:53:15,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-17 21:53:15,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-17 21:53:15,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-17 21:53:15,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-17 21:53:15,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-17 21:53:15,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-17 21:53:15,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-17 21:53:15,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-17 21:53:15,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-17 21:53:15,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-17 21:53:15,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-17 21:53:15,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-17 21:53:15,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-17 21:53:15,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-17 21:53:15,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-17 21:53:15,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-17 21:53:15,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-17 21:53:15,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-17 21:53:15,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-17 21:53:15,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-17 21:53:15,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-17 21:53:15,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-17 21:53:15,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-17 21:53:15,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-17 21:53:15,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-17 21:53:15,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-17 21:53:15,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-17 21:53:15,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-17 21:53:15,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-17 21:53:15,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-17 21:53:15,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-17 21:53:15,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-17 21:53:15,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-17 21:53:15,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-17 21:53:15,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-17 21:53:15,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-17 21:53:15,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-17 21:53:15,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-17 21:53:15,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-17 21:53:15,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-17 21:53:15,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-17 21:53:15,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-17 21:53:15,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-17 21:53:15,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-17 21:53:15,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-17 21:53:15,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-17 21:53:15,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-17 21:53:15,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-17 21:53:15,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-17 21:53:15,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-17 21:53:15,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-17 21:53:15,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-17 21:53:15,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-17 21:53:15,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-17 21:53:15,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-17 21:53:15,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-17 21:53:15,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-17 21:53:15,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-17 21:53:15,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-17 21:53:15,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-17 21:53:15,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-17 21:53:15,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-17 21:53:15,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-17 21:53:15,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-17 21:53:15,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-17 21:53:15,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-17 21:53:15,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-17 21:53:15,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-17 21:53:15,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-17 21:53:15,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-17 21:53:15,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-17 21:53:15,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-17 21:53:15,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-17 21:53:15,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-17 21:53:15,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-17 21:53:15,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-17 21:53:15,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-17 21:53:15,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-17 21:53:15,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-17 21:53:15,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-17 21:53:15,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-17 21:53:15,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-17 21:53:15,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-17 21:53:15,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-17 21:53:15,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-17 21:53:15,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-17 21:53:15,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-17 21:53:15,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-17 21:53:15,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-17 21:53:15,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-17 21:53:15,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-17 21:53:15,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-17 21:53:15,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-17 21:53:15,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-17 21:53:15,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-17 21:53:15,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-17 21:53:15,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-17 21:53:15,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-17 21:53:15,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-17 21:53:15,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-17 21:53:15,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-17 21:53:15,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-17 21:53:15,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-17 21:53:15,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-17 21:53:15,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-17 21:53:15,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-17 21:53:15,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-17 21:53:15,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-17 21:53:15,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-17 21:53:15,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-17 21:53:15,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-17 21:53:15,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-17 21:53:15,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-17 21:53:15,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-17 21:53:15,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-17 21:53:15,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-17 21:53:15,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-17 21:53:15,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-17 21:53:15,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-17 21:53:15,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-17 21:53:15,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-17 21:53:15,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-17 21:53:15,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-17 21:53:15,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-17 21:53:15,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-17 21:53:15,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-17 21:53:15,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-17 21:53:15,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-17 21:53:15,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-17 21:53:15,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-17 21:53:15,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-17 21:53:15,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-17 21:53:15,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-17 21:53:15,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-17 21:53:15,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-17 21:53:15,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-17 21:53:15,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-17 21:53:15,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-17 21:53:15,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-17 21:53:15,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-17 21:53:15,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-17 21:53:15,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-17 21:53:15,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-17 21:53:15,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-17 21:53:15,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-17 21:53:15,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-17 21:53:15,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-17 21:53:15,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-17 21:53:15,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-17 21:53:15,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-17 21:53:15,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-17 21:53:15,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-17 21:53:15,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-17 21:53:15,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-17 21:53:15,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-17 21:53:15,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-17 21:53:15,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-17 21:53:15,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-17 21:53:15,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-17 21:53:15,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-17 21:53:15,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-17 21:53:15,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-17 21:53:15,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-17 21:53:15,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-17 21:53:15,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-17 21:53:15,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-17 21:53:15,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-17 21:53:15,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-17 21:53:15,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-17 21:53:15,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-17 21:53:15,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-17 21:53:15,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-17 21:53:15,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-17 21:53:15,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-17 21:53:15,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-17 21:53:15,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-17 21:53:15,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-17 21:53:15,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-17 21:53:15,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-17 21:53:15,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-17 21:53:15,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-17 21:53:15,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-17 21:53:15,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-17 21:53:15,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-17 21:53:15,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-17 21:53:15,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-17 21:53:15,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-17 21:53:15,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-17 21:53:15,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-17 21:53:15,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-17 21:53:15,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-17 21:53:15,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-17 21:53:15,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-17 21:53:15,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-17 21:53:15,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-17 21:53:15,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-17 21:53:15,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-17 21:53:15,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-17 21:53:15,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-17 21:53:15,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-17 21:53:15,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-17 21:53:15,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-17 21:53:15,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-17 21:53:15,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-17 21:53:15,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-17 21:53:15,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-17 21:53:15,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-17 21:53:15,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-17 21:53:15,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-17 21:53:15,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-17 21:53:15,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-17 21:53:15,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-17 21:53:15,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-17 21:53:15,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-17 21:53:15,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-17 21:53:15,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-17 21:53:15,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-17 21:53:15,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-17 21:53:15,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-17 21:53:15,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-17 21:53:15,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-17 21:53:15,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-17 21:53:15,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-17 21:53:15,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-17 21:53:15,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-17 21:53:15,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-17 21:53:15,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-17 21:53:15,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-17 21:53:15,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-17 21:53:15,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-17 21:53:15,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-17 21:53:15,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-17 21:53:15,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-17 21:53:15,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-17 21:53:15,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-17 21:53:15,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-17 21:53:15,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-17 21:53:15,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-17 21:53:15,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-17 21:53:15,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-17 21:53:15,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-17 21:53:15,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-17 21:53:15,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-17 21:53:15,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-17 21:53:15,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-17 21:53:15,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-17 21:53:15,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-17 21:53:15,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-17 21:53:15,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-17 21:53:15,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-17 21:53:15,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-17 21:53:15,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-17 21:53:15,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-17 21:53:15,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-17 21:53:15,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-17 21:53:15,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-17 21:53:15,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-17 21:53:15,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-17 21:53:15,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-17 21:53:15,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-17 21:53:15,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-17 21:53:15,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-17 21:53:15,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-17 21:53:15,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-17 21:53:15,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-17 21:53:15,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-17 21:53:15,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-17 21:53:15,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-17 21:53:15,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-17 21:53:15,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-17 21:53:15,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-17 21:53:15,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-17 21:53:15,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-17 21:53:15,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-17 21:53:15,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-17 21:53:15,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-17 21:53:15,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-17 21:53:15,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-17 21:53:15,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-17 21:53:15,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-17 21:53:15,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-17 21:53:15,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-17 21:53:15,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-17 21:53:15,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-17 21:53:15,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-17 21:53:15,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-17 21:53:15,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-17 21:53:15,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-17 21:53:15,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-17 21:53:15,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-17 21:53:15,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-17 21:53:15,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-17 21:53:15,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-17 21:53:15,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-17 21:53:15,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-17 21:53:15,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-17 21:53:15,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-17 21:53:15,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-17 21:53:15,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-17 21:53:15,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-17 21:53:15,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-17 21:53:15,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-17 21:53:15,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-17 21:53:15,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-17 21:53:15,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-17 21:53:15,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-17 21:53:15,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-17 21:53:15,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-17 21:53:15,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-17 21:53:15,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-17 21:53:15,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-17 21:53:15,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-17 21:53:15,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-17 21:53:15,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-17 21:53:15,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-17 21:53:15,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-17 21:53:15,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-17 21:53:15,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-17 21:53:15,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-17 21:53:15,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-17 21:53:15,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-17 21:53:15,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-17 21:53:15,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-17 21:53:15,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-17 21:53:15,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-17 21:53:15,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-17 21:53:15,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-17 21:53:15,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-17 21:53:15,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-17 21:53:15,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-17 21:53:15,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-17 21:53:15,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-17 21:53:15,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-17 21:53:15,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-17 21:53:15,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-17 21:53:15,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-17 21:53:15,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-17 21:53:15,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-17 21:53:15,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-17 21:53:15,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-17 21:53:15,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-17 21:53:15,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-17 21:53:15,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-17 21:53:15,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-17 21:53:15,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-17 21:53:15,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-17 21:53:15,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-17 21:53:15,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-17 21:53:15,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:15,065 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:15,065 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-17 21:53:15,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv871358531=369, srv64697211=312, srv653261481=314, srv1778141916=154, srv716510755=323, srv372169288=255, srv568235512=298, srv710229516=322, srv537137712=293, srv1682791519=131, srv642353994=311, srv1046656068=13, srv993792848=391, srv1202667070=39, srv99567927=392, srv1607947050=111, srv1677371877=129, srv1763526149=150, srv1763378353=149, srv531263272=289, srv448398842=270, srv802808934=348, srv77960001=340, srv453521623=271, srv162773041=114, srv563606057=295, srv1659238910=122, srv1279307656=55, srv1914255334=183, srv1296605582=61, srv2131597846=222, srv1375359355=72, srv1405269336=79, srv175680261=147, srv282211488=242, srv1412891098=82, srv375712549=257, srv191234370=182, srv1574132168=106, srv1853511149=168, srv617306884=307, srv268601623=238, srv1400099806=78, srv477381292=275, srv1279442050=56, srv535853198=292, srv1767480590=152, srv2100700333=211, srv1187847151=37, srv791064637=345, srv74478935=330, srv1206084762=41, srv1497856295=97, srv897884865=377, srv398014971=261, srv786136704=342, srv1429879791=86, srv1201763981=38, srv1415213844=84, srv302220908=243, srv156683359=105, srv1974497084=192, srv535358845=291, srv627763604=308, srv732106437=326, srv1679724304=130, srv576770232=299, srv478480013=276, srv1237250370=47, srv1169018295=34, srv32320833=248, srv594880186=304, srv216306370=225, srv656484240=315, srv818754908=354, srv1321058011=63, srv1256345927=52, srv1670847243=126, srv1515243164=99, srv1781378955=156, srv508388209=278, srv1910886192=180, srv1718898730=139, srv772274482=337, srv1433624807=87, srv848605385=359, srv2107957639=212, srv270591905=240, srv2126706298=219, srv2080681743=209, srv1683990934=132, srv11526364=28, srv761020484=334, srv1720507603=141, srv266276730=236, srv935213051=386, srv923440665=383, srv1911104834=181, srv1944131651=187, srv1162841146=30, srv1921230216=185, srv319459319=247, srv1168022226=33, srv57689659=300, srv716533901=324, srv1255156178=50, srv441379967=267, srv806979625=350, srv788255577=344, srv976533744=389, srv1317853355=62, srv1491073587=96, srv777865249=339, srv2130226580=221, srv873230355=370, srv971370780=388, srv2008207413=197, srv989150800=390, srv737980208=328, srv862088563=363, srv1716783669=138, srv1801293056=160, srv1363984373=68, srv515711115=282, srv1378945327=75, srv17002515=136, srv853498273=361, srv1825292480=165, srv2124576425=217, srv1889349340=175, srv527691188=286, srv1226737728=44, srv1781498156=157, srv104267960=11, srv1663644309=124, srv1672213768=127, srv740402944=329, srv555807163=294, srv566277037=296, srv734882045=327, srv1143683685=27, srv1021400966=5, srv694407347=319, srv1626790310=113, srv303328507=244, srv1869166689=171, srv781623755=341, srv40741117=264, srv1958265988=190, srv592380483=303, srv483565354=277, srv1531731329=100, srv359746409=253, srv1271131029=54, srv1007512250=2, srv1783696565=158, srv1284150263=57, srv1648846971=118, srv120365207=40, srv263085176=235, srv535080964=290, srv824739010=357, srv744793832=331, srv1073394883=18, srv1113186104=23, srv1370321362=69, srv328204461=249, srv1604342762=109, srv266460489=237, srv313806624=245, srv1473408823=93, srv865692144=366, srv42814401=265, srv104065318=10, srv1599236554=108, srv1476834435=94, srv1673452142=128, srv716892727=325, srv1501773847=98, srv791504502=346, srv367902453=254, srv254349567=232, srv2126102976=218, srv252714068=231, srv916506189=380, srv687320190=318, srv1000433998=0, srv51396503=281, srv648464134=313, srv908419423=379, srv204022732=200, srv1901650254=177, srv200342397=196, srv765841762=335, srv1849125656=167, srv235281774=226, srv2137298641=224, srv517347076=283, srv1687711069=135, srv800105834=347, srv1609917009=112, srv1038797815=9, srv863216619=365, srv921796978=382, srv895924009=376, srv319002955=246, srv611122413=305, srv1942590787=186, srv529333113=288, srv1053973741=14, srv1988512138=194, srv1037112526=8, srv442327402=268, srv2062351281=204, srv1240518778=48, srv471289019=274, srv1857090224=170, srv1543025253=101, srv1915241294=184, srv238420451=228, srv1747796150=145, srv1101668258=21, srv1437034663=88, srv1173449481=35, srv582652595=301, srv1739043021=144, srv1733173130=143, srv465824154=272, srv14463216=91, srv1720161153=140, srv1549403995=102, srv235920151=227, srv1909060246=179, srv527988350=287, srv1801762669=161, srv89501442=375, srv442994824=269, srv1414012241=83, srv165153258=121, srv1766333515=151, srv2063438865=205, srv1071671801=17, srv1638570398=116, srv1035353226=7, srv1856921753=169, srv1887444158=173, srv1897306674=176, srv1255718022=51, srv1260078897=53, srv1372945218=70, srv1163715139=31, srv175471358=146, srv1558656747=104, srv1463869996=92, srv124825865=49, srv1142495625=26, srv1397803774=77, srv1644508836=117, srv1807320536=162, srv1165273546=32, srv1650978005=120, srv1374260725=71, srv2065239646=206, srv1685737274=134, srv878340336=371, srv329463090=250, srv2112675912=213, srv1378293943=74, srv787532288=343, srv1292867420=59, srv519831391=285, srv1002018470=1, srv822141051=356, srv1229740495=45, srv706370370=321, srv255741565=233, srv1177018836=36, srv1223505925=43, srv745532463=332, srv1820836786=163, srv2127145828=220, srv2124524081=216, srv665150476=316, srv2132621880=223, srv2051928856=203, srv1903063797=178, srv881186303=373, srv1758974023=148, srv270549378=239, srv2014789268=198, srv1663469360=123, srv1331983035=65, srv1768940632=153, srv2084732799=210, srv1043044287=12, srv630246195=309, srv86319792=364, srv37305654=256, srv1650394019=119, srv1888093001=174, srv512441512=280, srv813969264=352, srv277288989=241, srv2017714321=199, srv1410469782=81, srv751917673=333, srv1443060804=89, srv1997063872=195, srv404426071=263, srv1443287861=90, srv695697141=320, srv636958174=310, srv1105584096=22, srv583005569=302, srv92523166=384, srv330226906=251, srv1684865692=133, srv381463497=258, srv567942525=297, srv1010403208=3, srv881516937=374, srv140693587=80, srv1872213858=172, srv262210172=234, srv846799674=358, srv851169364=360, srv880017865=372, srv129190288=58, srv401606217=262, srv669535820=317, srv1325384866=64, srv1377673856=73, srv1416276025=85, srv430431276=266, srv81513922=353, srv2044458062=201, srv2118166427=214, srv1665530216=125, srv2045587532=202, srv1824773168=164, srv2071913725=208, srv1295499145=60, srv1780304939=155, srv612277490=306, srv102508625=6, srv1637539828=115, srv820424989=355, srv50966795=279, srv1950402166=188, srv1207208580=42, srv1057648579=16, srv1084295726=20, srv39165764=260, srv959379519=387, srv2066402828=207, srv1556810592=103, srv1232731779=46, srv1606144164=110, srv1487275322=95, srv519310224=284, srv775221203=338, srv1079168923=19, srv1957834842=189, srv866525142=367, srv243907419=229, srv248553307=230, srv344122075=252, srv467461515=273, srv805609280=349, srv1018507425=4, srv1827511993=166, srv1704639485=137, srv855754935=362, srv1057024901=15, srv1116429721=24, srv927375731=385, srv1383836323=76, srv1584407048=107, srv809779157=351, srv1786622589=159, srv869541705=368, srv1123072042=25, srv1726136626=142, srv135800579=67, srv1958676591=191, srv390748718=259, srv907223095=378, srv76871917=336, srv1160170031=29, srv2119727728=215, srv918100507=381, srv1352063642=66, srv1975716907=193} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:15,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:15,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:15,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:15,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:15,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:15,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:15,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:15,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:15,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:15,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:15,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-17 21:53:15,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-17 21:53:15,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-17 21:53:15,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-17 21:53:15,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-17 21:53:15,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-17 21:53:15,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-17 21:53:15,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-17 21:53:15,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-17 21:53:15,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-17 21:53:15,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-17 21:53:15,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-17 21:53:15,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-17 21:53:15,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-17 21:53:15,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-17 21:53:15,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-17 21:53:15,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-17 21:53:15,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-17 21:53:15,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-17 21:53:15,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-17 21:53:15,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-17 21:53:15,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-17 21:53:15,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-17 21:53:15,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-17 21:53:15,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-17 21:53:15,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-17 21:53:15,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-17 21:53:15,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-17 21:53:15,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-17 21:53:15,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-17 21:53:15,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-17 21:53:15,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-17 21:53:15,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-17 21:53:15,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-17 21:53:15,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-17 21:53:15,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-17 21:53:15,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-17 21:53:15,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-17 21:53:15,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-17 21:53:15,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-17 21:53:15,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-17 21:53:15,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-17 21:53:15,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-17 21:53:15,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-17 21:53:15,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-17 21:53:15,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-17 21:53:15,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-17 21:53:15,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-17 21:53:15,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-17 21:53:15,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-17 21:53:15,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-17 21:53:15,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-17 21:53:15,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-17 21:53:15,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-17 21:53:15,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-17 21:53:15,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-17 21:53:15,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-17 21:53:15,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-17 21:53:15,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-17 21:53:15,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-17 21:53:15,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-17 21:53:15,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-17 21:53:15,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-17 21:53:15,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-17 21:53:15,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-17 21:53:15,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-17 21:53:15,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-17 21:53:15,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-17 21:53:15,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-17 21:53:15,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-17 21:53:15,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-17 21:53:15,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-17 21:53:15,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-17 21:53:15,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-17 21:53:15,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-17 21:53:15,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-17 21:53:15,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-17 21:53:15,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-17 21:53:15,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-17 21:53:15,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-17 21:53:15,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-17 21:53:15,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-17 21:53:15,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-17 21:53:15,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-17 21:53:15,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-17 21:53:15,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-17 21:53:15,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-17 21:53:15,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-17 21:53:15,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-17 21:53:15,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-17 21:53:15,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-17 21:53:15,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-17 21:53:15,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-17 21:53:15,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-17 21:53:15,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-17 21:53:15,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-17 21:53:15,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-17 21:53:15,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-17 21:53:15,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-17 21:53:15,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-17 21:53:15,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-17 21:53:15,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-17 21:53:15,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-17 21:53:15,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-17 21:53:15,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-17 21:53:15,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-17 21:53:15,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-17 21:53:15,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-17 21:53:15,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-17 21:53:15,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-17 21:53:15,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-17 21:53:15,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-17 21:53:15,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-17 21:53:15,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-17 21:53:15,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-17 21:53:15,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-17 21:53:15,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-17 21:53:15,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-17 21:53:15,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-17 21:53:15,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-17 21:53:15,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-17 21:53:15,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-17 21:53:15,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-17 21:53:15,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-17 21:53:15,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-17 21:53:15,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-17 21:53:15,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-17 21:53:15,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-17 21:53:15,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-17 21:53:15,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-17 21:53:15,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-17 21:53:15,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-17 21:53:15,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-17 21:53:15,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-17 21:53:15,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-17 21:53:15,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-17 21:53:15,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-17 21:53:15,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-17 21:53:15,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-17 21:53:15,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-17 21:53:15,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-17 21:53:15,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-17 21:53:15,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-17 21:53:15,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-17 21:53:15,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-17 21:53:15,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-17 21:53:15,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-17 21:53:15,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-17 21:53:15,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-17 21:53:15,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-17 21:53:15,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-17 21:53:15,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-17 21:53:15,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-17 21:53:15,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-17 21:53:15,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-17 21:53:15,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-17 21:53:15,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-17 21:53:15,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-17 21:53:15,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-17 21:53:15,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-17 21:53:15,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-17 21:53:15,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-17 21:53:15,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-17 21:53:15,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-17 21:53:15,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-17 21:53:15,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-17 21:53:15,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-17 21:53:15,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-17 21:53:15,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-17 21:53:15,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-17 21:53:15,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-17 21:53:15,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-17 21:53:15,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-17 21:53:15,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-17 21:53:15,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-17 21:53:15,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-17 21:53:15,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-17 21:53:15,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-17 21:53:15,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-17 21:53:15,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-17 21:53:15,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-17 21:53:15,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-17 21:53:15,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-17 21:53:15,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-17 21:53:15,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-17 21:53:15,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-17 21:53:15,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-17 21:53:15,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-17 21:53:15,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-17 21:53:15,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-17 21:53:15,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-17 21:53:15,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-17 21:53:15,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-17 21:53:15,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-17 21:53:15,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-17 21:53:15,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-17 21:53:15,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-17 21:53:15,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-17 21:53:15,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-17 21:53:15,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-17 21:53:15,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-17 21:53:15,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-17 21:53:15,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-17 21:53:15,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-17 21:53:15,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-17 21:53:15,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-17 21:53:15,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-17 21:53:15,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-17 21:53:15,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-17 21:53:15,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-17 21:53:15,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-17 21:53:15,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-17 21:53:15,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-17 21:53:15,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-17 21:53:15,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-17 21:53:15,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-17 21:53:15,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-17 21:53:15,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-17 21:53:15,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-17 21:53:15,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-17 21:53:15,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-17 21:53:15,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-17 21:53:15,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-17 21:53:15,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-17 21:53:15,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-17 21:53:15,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-17 21:53:15,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-17 21:53:15,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-17 21:53:15,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-17 21:53:15,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-17 21:53:15,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-17 21:53:15,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-17 21:53:15,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-17 21:53:15,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-17 21:53:15,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-17 21:53:15,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-17 21:53:15,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-17 21:53:15,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-17 21:53:15,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-17 21:53:15,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-17 21:53:15,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-17 21:53:15,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-17 21:53:15,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-17 21:53:15,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-17 21:53:15,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-17 21:53:15,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-17 21:53:15,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-17 21:53:15,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-17 21:53:15,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-17 21:53:15,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-17 21:53:15,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-17 21:53:15,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-17 21:53:15,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-17 21:53:15,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-17 21:53:15,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-17 21:53:15,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-17 21:53:15,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-17 21:53:15,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-17 21:53:15,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-17 21:53:15,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-17 21:53:15,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-17 21:53:15,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-17 21:53:15,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-17 21:53:15,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-17 21:53:15,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-17 21:53:15,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-17 21:53:15,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-17 21:53:15,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-17 21:53:15,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-17 21:53:15,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-17 21:53:15,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-17 21:53:15,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-17 21:53:15,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-17 21:53:15,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-17 21:53:15,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-17 21:53:15,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-17 21:53:15,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-17 21:53:15,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-17 21:53:15,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-17 21:53:15,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-17 21:53:15,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-17 21:53:15,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-17 21:53:15,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-17 21:53:15,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-17 21:53:15,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-17 21:53:15,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-17 21:53:15,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-17 21:53:15,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-17 21:53:15,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-17 21:53:15,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-17 21:53:15,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-17 21:53:15,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-17 21:53:15,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-17 21:53:15,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-17 21:53:15,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-17 21:53:15,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-17 21:53:15,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-17 21:53:15,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-17 21:53:15,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-17 21:53:15,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-17 21:53:15,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-17 21:53:15,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-17 21:53:15,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-17 21:53:15,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-17 21:53:15,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-17 21:53:15,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-17 21:53:15,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-17 21:53:15,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-17 21:53:15,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-17 21:53:15,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-17 21:53:15,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-17 21:53:15,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-17 21:53:15,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-17 21:53:15,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-17 21:53:15,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-17 21:53:15,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-17 21:53:15,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-17 21:53:15,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-17 21:53:15,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-17 21:53:15,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-17 21:53:15,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-17 21:53:15,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-17 21:53:15,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-17 21:53:15,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-17 21:53:15,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-17 21:53:15,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-17 21:53:15,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-17 21:53:15,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-17 21:53:15,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-17 21:53:15,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-17 21:53:15,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-17 21:53:15,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-17 21:53:15,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-17 21:53:15,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-17 21:53:15,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-17 21:53:15,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-17 21:53:15,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-17 21:53:15,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-17 21:53:15,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-17 21:53:15,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-17 21:53:15,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-17 21:53:15,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-17 21:53:15,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-17 21:53:15,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-17 21:53:15,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-17 21:53:15,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-17 21:53:15,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-17 21:53:15,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-17 21:53:15,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-17 21:53:15,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-17 21:53:15,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-17 21:53:15,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-17 21:53:15,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-17 21:53:15,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-17 21:53:15,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-17 21:53:15,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-17 21:53:15,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-17 21:53:15,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-17 21:53:15,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-17 21:53:15,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-17 21:53:15,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-17 21:53:15,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-17 21:53:15,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-17 21:53:15,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-17 21:53:15,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-17 21:53:15,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-17 21:53:15,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-17 21:53:15,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-17 21:53:15,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-17 21:53:15,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-17 21:53:15,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-17 21:53:15,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-17 21:53:15,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-17 21:53:15,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-17 21:53:15,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-17 21:53:15,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-17 21:53:15,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-17 21:53:15,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-17 21:53:15,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-17 21:53:15,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-17 21:53:15,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-17 21:53:15,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-17 21:53:15,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-17 21:53:15,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:15,080 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:15,080 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-17 21:53:15,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv871358531=369, srv64697211=312, srv653261481=314, srv1778141916=154, srv716510755=323, srv372169288=255, srv568235512=298, srv710229516=322, srv537137712=293, srv1682791519=131, srv642353994=311, srv1046656068=13, srv993792848=391, srv1202667070=39, srv99567927=392, srv1607947050=111, srv1677371877=129, srv1763526149=150, srv1763378353=149, srv531263272=289, srv448398842=270, srv802808934=348, srv77960001=340, srv453521623=271, srv162773041=114, srv563606057=295, srv1659238910=122, srv1279307656=55, srv1914255334=183, srv1296605582=61, srv2131597846=222, srv1375359355=72, srv1405269336=79, srv175680261=147, srv282211488=242, srv1412891098=82, srv375712549=257, srv191234370=182, srv1574132168=106, srv1853511149=168, srv617306884=307, srv268601623=238, srv1400099806=78, srv477381292=275, srv1279442050=56, srv535853198=292, srv1767480590=152, srv2100700333=211, srv1187847151=37, srv791064637=345, srv74478935=330, srv1206084762=41, srv1497856295=97, srv897884865=377, srv398014971=261, srv786136704=342, srv1429879791=86, srv1201763981=38, srv1415213844=84, srv302220908=243, srv156683359=105, srv1974497084=192, srv535358845=291, srv627763604=308, srv732106437=326, srv1679724304=130, srv576770232=299, srv478480013=276, srv1237250370=47, srv1169018295=34, srv32320833=248, srv594880186=304, srv216306370=225, srv656484240=315, srv818754908=354, srv1321058011=63, srv1256345927=52, srv1670847243=126, srv1515243164=99, srv1781378955=156, srv508388209=278, srv1910886192=180, srv1718898730=139, srv772274482=337, srv1433624807=87, srv848605385=359, srv2107957639=212, srv270591905=240, srv2126706298=219, srv2080681743=209, srv1683990934=132, srv11526364=28, srv761020484=334, srv1720507603=141, srv266276730=236, srv935213051=386, srv923440665=383, srv1911104834=181, srv1944131651=187, srv1162841146=30, srv1921230216=185, srv319459319=247, srv1168022226=33, srv57689659=300, srv716533901=324, srv1255156178=50, srv441379967=267, srv806979625=350, srv788255577=344, srv976533744=389, srv1317853355=62, srv1491073587=96, srv777865249=339, srv2130226580=221, srv873230355=370, srv971370780=388, srv2008207413=197, srv989150800=390, srv737980208=328, srv862088563=363, srv1716783669=138, srv1801293056=160, srv1363984373=68, srv515711115=282, srv1378945327=75, srv17002515=136, srv853498273=361, srv1825292480=165, srv2124576425=217, srv1889349340=175, srv527691188=286, srv1226737728=44, srv1781498156=157, srv104267960=11, srv1663644309=124, srv1672213768=127, srv740402944=329, srv555807163=294, srv566277037=296, srv734882045=327, srv1143683685=27, srv1021400966=5, srv694407347=319, srv1626790310=113, srv303328507=244, srv1869166689=171, srv781623755=341, srv40741117=264, srv1958265988=190, srv592380483=303, srv483565354=277, srv1531731329=100, srv359746409=253, srv1271131029=54, srv1007512250=2, srv1783696565=158, srv1284150263=57, srv1648846971=118, srv120365207=40, srv263085176=235, srv535080964=290, srv824739010=357, srv744793832=331, srv1073394883=18, srv1113186104=23, srv1370321362=69, srv328204461=249, srv1604342762=109, srv266460489=237, srv313806624=245, srv1473408823=93, srv865692144=366, srv42814401=265, srv104065318=10, srv1599236554=108, srv1476834435=94, srv1673452142=128, srv716892727=325, srv1501773847=98, srv791504502=346, srv367902453=254, srv254349567=232, srv2126102976=218, srv252714068=231, srv916506189=380, srv687320190=318, srv1000433998=0, srv51396503=281, srv648464134=313, srv908419423=379, srv204022732=200, srv1901650254=177, srv200342397=196, srv765841762=335, srv1849125656=167, srv235281774=226, srv2137298641=224, srv517347076=283, srv1687711069=135, srv800105834=347, srv1609917009=112, srv1038797815=9, srv863216619=365, srv921796978=382, srv895924009=376, srv319002955=246, srv611122413=305, srv1942590787=186, srv529333113=288, srv1053973741=14, srv1988512138=194, srv1037112526=8, srv442327402=268, srv2062351281=204, srv1240518778=48, srv471289019=274, srv1857090224=170, srv1543025253=101, srv1915241294=184, srv238420451=228, srv1747796150=145, srv1101668258=21, srv1437034663=88, srv1173449481=35, srv582652595=301, srv1739043021=144, srv1733173130=143, srv465824154=272, srv14463216=91, srv1720161153=140, srv1549403995=102, srv235920151=227, srv1909060246=179, srv527988350=287, srv1801762669=161, srv89501442=375, srv442994824=269, srv1414012241=83, srv165153258=121, srv1766333515=151, srv2063438865=205, srv1071671801=17, srv1638570398=116, srv1035353226=7, srv1856921753=169, srv1887444158=173, srv1897306674=176, srv1255718022=51, srv1260078897=53, srv1372945218=70, srv1163715139=31, srv175471358=146, srv1558656747=104, srv1463869996=92, srv124825865=49, srv1142495625=26, srv1397803774=77, srv1644508836=117, srv1807320536=162, srv1165273546=32, srv1650978005=120, srv1374260725=71, srv2065239646=206, srv1685737274=134, srv878340336=371, srv329463090=250, srv2112675912=213, srv1378293943=74, srv787532288=343, srv1292867420=59, srv519831391=285, srv1002018470=1, srv822141051=356, srv1229740495=45, srv706370370=321, srv255741565=233, srv1177018836=36, srv1223505925=43, srv745532463=332, srv1820836786=163, srv2127145828=220, srv2124524081=216, srv665150476=316, srv2132621880=223, srv2051928856=203, srv1903063797=178, srv881186303=373, srv1758974023=148, srv270549378=239, srv2014789268=198, srv1663469360=123, srv1331983035=65, srv1768940632=153, srv2084732799=210, srv1043044287=12, srv630246195=309, srv86319792=364, srv37305654=256, srv1650394019=119, srv1888093001=174, srv512441512=280, srv813969264=352, srv277288989=241, srv2017714321=199, srv1410469782=81, srv751917673=333, srv1443060804=89, srv1997063872=195, srv404426071=263, srv1443287861=90, srv695697141=320, srv636958174=310, srv1105584096=22, srv583005569=302, srv92523166=384, srv330226906=251, srv1684865692=133, srv381463497=258, srv567942525=297, srv1010403208=3, srv881516937=374, srv140693587=80, srv1872213858=172, srv262210172=234, srv846799674=358, srv851169364=360, srv880017865=372, srv129190288=58, srv401606217=262, srv669535820=317, srv1325384866=64, srv1377673856=73, srv1416276025=85, srv430431276=266, srv81513922=353, srv2044458062=201, srv2118166427=214, srv1665530216=125, srv2045587532=202, srv1824773168=164, srv2071913725=208, srv1295499145=60, srv1780304939=155, srv612277490=306, srv102508625=6, srv1637539828=115, srv820424989=355, srv50966795=279, srv1950402166=188, srv1207208580=42, srv1057648579=16, srv1084295726=20, srv39165764=260, srv959379519=387, srv2066402828=207, srv1556810592=103, srv1232731779=46, srv1606144164=110, srv1487275322=95, srv519310224=284, srv775221203=338, srv1079168923=19, srv1957834842=189, srv866525142=367, srv243907419=229, srv248553307=230, srv344122075=252, srv467461515=273, srv805609280=349, srv1018507425=4, srv1827511993=166, srv1704639485=137, srv855754935=362, srv1057024901=15, srv1116429721=24, srv927375731=385, srv1383836323=76, srv1584407048=107, srv809779157=351, srv1786622589=159, srv869541705=368, srv1123072042=25, srv1726136626=142, srv135800579=67, srv1958676591=191, srv390748718=259, srv907223095=378, srv76871917=336, srv1160170031=29, srv2119727728=215, srv918100507=381, srv1352063642=66, srv1975716907=193} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:15,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:15,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:15,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:15,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:15,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:15,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:15,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:15,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:15,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:15,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:15,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-17 21:53:15,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-17 21:53:15,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-17 21:53:15,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-17 21:53:15,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-17 21:53:15,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-17 21:53:15,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-17 21:53:15,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-17 21:53:15,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-17 21:53:15,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-17 21:53:15,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-17 21:53:15,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-17 21:53:15,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-17 21:53:15,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-17 21:53:15,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-17 21:53:15,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-17 21:53:15,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-17 21:53:15,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-17 21:53:15,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-17 21:53:15,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-17 21:53:15,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-17 21:53:15,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-17 21:53:15,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-17 21:53:15,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-17 21:53:15,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-17 21:53:15,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-17 21:53:15,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-17 21:53:15,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-17 21:53:15,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-17 21:53:15,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-17 21:53:15,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-17 21:53:15,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-17 21:53:15,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-17 21:53:15,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-17 21:53:15,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-17 21:53:15,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-17 21:53:15,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-17 21:53:15,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-17 21:53:15,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-17 21:53:15,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-17 21:53:15,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-17 21:53:15,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-17 21:53:15,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-17 21:53:15,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-17 21:53:15,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-17 21:53:15,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-17 21:53:15,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-17 21:53:15,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-17 21:53:15,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-17 21:53:15,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-17 21:53:15,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-17 21:53:15,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-17 21:53:15,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-17 21:53:15,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-17 21:53:15,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-17 21:53:15,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-17 21:53:15,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-17 21:53:15,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-17 21:53:15,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-17 21:53:15,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-17 21:53:15,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-17 21:53:15,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-17 21:53:15,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-17 21:53:15,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-17 21:53:15,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-17 21:53:15,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-17 21:53:15,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-17 21:53:15,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-17 21:53:15,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-17 21:53:15,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-17 21:53:15,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-17 21:53:15,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-17 21:53:15,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-17 21:53:15,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-17 21:53:15,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-17 21:53:15,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-17 21:53:15,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-17 21:53:15,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-17 21:53:15,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-17 21:53:15,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-17 21:53:15,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-17 21:53:15,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-17 21:53:15,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-17 21:53:15,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-17 21:53:15,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-17 21:53:15,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-17 21:53:15,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-17 21:53:15,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-17 21:53:15,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-17 21:53:15,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-17 21:53:15,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-17 21:53:15,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-17 21:53:15,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-17 21:53:15,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-17 21:53:15,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-17 21:53:15,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-17 21:53:15,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-17 21:53:15,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-17 21:53:15,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-17 21:53:15,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-17 21:53:15,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-17 21:53:15,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-17 21:53:15,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-17 21:53:15,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-17 21:53:15,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-17 21:53:15,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-17 21:53:15,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-17 21:53:15,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-17 21:53:15,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-17 21:53:15,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-17 21:53:15,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-17 21:53:15,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-17 21:53:15,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-17 21:53:15,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-17 21:53:15,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-17 21:53:15,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-17 21:53:15,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-17 21:53:15,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-17 21:53:15,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-17 21:53:15,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-17 21:53:15,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-17 21:53:15,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-17 21:53:15,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-17 21:53:15,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-17 21:53:15,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-17 21:53:15,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-17 21:53:15,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-17 21:53:15,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-17 21:53:15,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-17 21:53:15,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-17 21:53:15,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-17 21:53:15,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-17 21:53:15,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-17 21:53:15,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-17 21:53:15,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-17 21:53:15,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-17 21:53:15,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-17 21:53:15,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-17 21:53:15,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-17 21:53:15,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-17 21:53:15,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-17 21:53:15,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-17 21:53:15,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-17 21:53:15,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-17 21:53:15,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-17 21:53:15,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-17 21:53:15,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-17 21:53:15,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-17 21:53:15,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-17 21:53:15,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-17 21:53:15,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-17 21:53:15,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-17 21:53:15,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-17 21:53:15,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-17 21:53:15,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-17 21:53:15,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-17 21:53:15,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-17 21:53:15,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-17 21:53:15,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-17 21:53:15,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-17 21:53:15,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-17 21:53:15,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-17 21:53:15,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-17 21:53:15,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-17 21:53:15,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-17 21:53:15,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-17 21:53:15,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-17 21:53:15,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-17 21:53:15,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-17 21:53:15,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-17 21:53:15,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-17 21:53:15,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-17 21:53:15,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-17 21:53:15,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-17 21:53:15,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-17 21:53:15,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-17 21:53:15,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-17 21:53:15,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-17 21:53:15,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-17 21:53:15,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-17 21:53:15,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-17 21:53:15,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-17 21:53:15,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-17 21:53:15,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-17 21:53:15,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-17 21:53:15,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-17 21:53:15,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-17 21:53:15,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-17 21:53:15,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-17 21:53:15,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-17 21:53:15,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-17 21:53:15,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-17 21:53:15,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-17 21:53:15,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-17 21:53:15,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-17 21:53:15,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-17 21:53:15,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-17 21:53:15,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-17 21:53:15,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-17 21:53:15,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-17 21:53:15,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-17 21:53:15,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-17 21:53:15,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-17 21:53:15,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-17 21:53:15,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-17 21:53:15,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-17 21:53:15,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-17 21:53:15,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-17 21:53:15,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-17 21:53:15,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-17 21:53:15,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-17 21:53:15,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-17 21:53:15,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-17 21:53:15,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-17 21:53:15,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-17 21:53:15,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-17 21:53:15,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-17 21:53:15,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-17 21:53:15,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-17 21:53:15,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-17 21:53:15,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-17 21:53:15,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-17 21:53:15,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-17 21:53:15,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-17 21:53:15,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-17 21:53:15,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-17 21:53:15,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-17 21:53:15,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-17 21:53:15,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-17 21:53:15,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-17 21:53:15,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-17 21:53:15,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-17 21:53:15,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-17 21:53:15,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-17 21:53:15,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-17 21:53:15,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-17 21:53:15,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-17 21:53:15,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-17 21:53:15,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-17 21:53:15,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-17 21:53:15,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-17 21:53:15,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-17 21:53:15,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-17 21:53:15,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-17 21:53:15,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-17 21:53:15,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-17 21:53:15,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-17 21:53:15,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-17 21:53:15,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-17 21:53:15,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-17 21:53:15,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-17 21:53:15,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-17 21:53:15,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-17 21:53:15,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-17 21:53:15,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-17 21:53:15,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-17 21:53:15,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-17 21:53:15,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-17 21:53:15,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-17 21:53:15,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-17 21:53:15,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-17 21:53:15,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-17 21:53:15,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-17 21:53:15,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-17 21:53:15,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-17 21:53:15,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-17 21:53:15,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-17 21:53:15,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-17 21:53:15,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-17 21:53:15,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-17 21:53:15,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-17 21:53:15,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-17 21:53:15,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-17 21:53:15,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-17 21:53:15,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-17 21:53:15,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-17 21:53:15,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-17 21:53:15,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-17 21:53:15,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-17 21:53:15,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-17 21:53:15,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-17 21:53:15,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-17 21:53:15,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-17 21:53:15,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-17 21:53:15,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-17 21:53:15,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-17 21:53:15,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-17 21:53:15,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-17 21:53:15,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-17 21:53:15,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-17 21:53:15,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-17 21:53:15,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-17 21:53:15,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-17 21:53:15,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-17 21:53:15,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-17 21:53:15,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-17 21:53:15,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-17 21:53:15,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-17 21:53:15,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-17 21:53:15,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-17 21:53:15,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-17 21:53:15,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-17 21:53:15,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-17 21:53:15,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-17 21:53:15,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-17 21:53:15,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-17 21:53:15,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-17 21:53:15,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-17 21:53:15,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-17 21:53:15,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-17 21:53:15,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-17 21:53:15,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-17 21:53:15,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-17 21:53:15,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-17 21:53:15,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-17 21:53:15,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-17 21:53:15,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-17 21:53:15,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-17 21:53:15,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-17 21:53:15,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-17 21:53:15,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-17 21:53:15,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-17 21:53:15,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-17 21:53:15,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-17 21:53:15,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-17 21:53:15,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-17 21:53:15,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-17 21:53:15,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-17 21:53:15,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-17 21:53:15,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-17 21:53:15,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-17 21:53:15,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-17 21:53:15,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-17 21:53:15,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-17 21:53:15,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-17 21:53:15,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-17 21:53:15,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-17 21:53:15,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-17 21:53:15,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-17 21:53:15,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-17 21:53:15,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-17 21:53:15,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-17 21:53:15,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-17 21:53:15,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-17 21:53:15,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-17 21:53:15,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-17 21:53:15,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-17 21:53:15,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-17 21:53:15,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-17 21:53:15,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-17 21:53:15,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-17 21:53:15,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-17 21:53:15,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-17 21:53:15,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-17 21:53:15,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-17 21:53:15,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-17 21:53:15,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-17 21:53:15,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-17 21:53:15,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-17 21:53:15,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-17 21:53:15,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-17 21:53:15,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-17 21:53:15,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-17 21:53:15,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-17 21:53:15,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-17 21:53:15,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-17 21:53:15,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-17 21:53:15,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-17 21:53:15,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-17 21:53:15,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-17 21:53:15,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-17 21:53:15,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-17 21:53:15,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-17 21:53:15,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-17 21:53:15,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-17 21:53:15,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-17 21:53:15,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-17 21:53:15,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-17 21:53:15,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-17 21:53:15,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-17 21:53:15,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-17 21:53:15,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-17 21:53:15,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-17 21:53:15,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:15,095 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:15,095 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-17 21:53:15,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv871358531=369, srv64697211=312, srv653261481=314, srv1778141916=154, srv716510755=323, srv372169288=255, srv568235512=298, srv710229516=322, srv537137712=293, srv1682791519=131, srv642353994=311, srv1046656068=13, srv993792848=391, srv1202667070=39, srv99567927=392, srv1607947050=111, srv1677371877=129, srv1763526149=150, srv1763378353=149, srv531263272=289, srv448398842=270, srv802808934=348, srv77960001=340, srv453521623=271, srv162773041=114, srv563606057=295, srv1659238910=122, srv1279307656=55, srv1914255334=183, srv1296605582=61, srv2131597846=222, srv1375359355=72, srv1405269336=79, srv175680261=147, srv282211488=242, srv1412891098=82, srv375712549=257, srv191234370=182, srv1574132168=106, srv1853511149=168, srv617306884=307, srv268601623=238, srv1400099806=78, srv477381292=275, srv1279442050=56, srv535853198=292, srv1767480590=152, srv2100700333=211, srv1187847151=37, srv791064637=345, srv74478935=330, srv1206084762=41, srv1497856295=97, srv897884865=377, srv398014971=261, srv786136704=342, srv1429879791=86, srv1201763981=38, srv1415213844=84, srv302220908=243, srv156683359=105, srv1974497084=192, srv535358845=291, srv627763604=308, srv732106437=326, srv1679724304=130, srv576770232=299, srv478480013=276, srv1237250370=47, srv1169018295=34, srv32320833=248, srv594880186=304, srv216306370=225, srv656484240=315, srv818754908=354, srv1321058011=63, srv1256345927=52, srv1670847243=126, srv1515243164=99, srv1781378955=156, srv508388209=278, srv1910886192=180, srv1718898730=139, srv772274482=337, srv1433624807=87, srv848605385=359, srv2107957639=212, srv270591905=240, srv2126706298=219, srv2080681743=209, srv1683990934=132, srv11526364=28, srv761020484=334, srv1720507603=141, srv266276730=236, srv935213051=386, srv923440665=383, srv1911104834=181, srv1944131651=187, srv1162841146=30, srv1921230216=185, srv319459319=247, srv1168022226=33, srv57689659=300, srv716533901=324, srv1255156178=50, srv441379967=267, srv806979625=350, srv788255577=344, srv976533744=389, srv1317853355=62, srv1491073587=96, srv777865249=339, srv2130226580=221, srv873230355=370, srv971370780=388, srv2008207413=197, srv989150800=390, srv737980208=328, srv862088563=363, srv1716783669=138, srv1801293056=160, srv1363984373=68, srv515711115=282, srv1378945327=75, srv17002515=136, srv853498273=361, srv1825292480=165, srv2124576425=217, srv1889349340=175, srv527691188=286, srv1226737728=44, srv1781498156=157, srv104267960=11, srv1663644309=124, srv1672213768=127, srv740402944=329, srv555807163=294, srv566277037=296, srv734882045=327, srv1143683685=27, srv1021400966=5, srv694407347=319, srv1626790310=113, srv303328507=244, srv1869166689=171, srv781623755=341, srv40741117=264, srv1958265988=190, srv592380483=303, srv483565354=277, srv1531731329=100, srv359746409=253, srv1271131029=54, srv1007512250=2, srv1783696565=158, srv1284150263=57, srv1648846971=118, srv120365207=40, srv263085176=235, srv535080964=290, srv824739010=357, srv744793832=331, srv1073394883=18, srv1113186104=23, srv1370321362=69, srv328204461=249, srv1604342762=109, srv266460489=237, srv313806624=245, srv1473408823=93, srv865692144=366, srv42814401=265, srv104065318=10, srv1599236554=108, srv1476834435=94, srv1673452142=128, srv716892727=325, srv1501773847=98, srv791504502=346, srv367902453=254, srv254349567=232, srv2126102976=218, srv252714068=231, srv916506189=380, srv687320190=318, srv1000433998=0, srv51396503=281, srv648464134=313, srv908419423=379, srv204022732=200, srv1901650254=177, srv200342397=196, srv765841762=335, srv1849125656=167, srv235281774=226, srv2137298641=224, srv517347076=283, srv1687711069=135, srv800105834=347, srv1609917009=112, srv1038797815=9, srv863216619=365, srv921796978=382, srv895924009=376, srv319002955=246, srv611122413=305, srv1942590787=186, srv529333113=288, srv1053973741=14, srv1988512138=194, srv1037112526=8, srv442327402=268, srv2062351281=204, srv1240518778=48, srv471289019=274, srv1857090224=170, srv1543025253=101, srv1915241294=184, srv238420451=228, srv1747796150=145, srv1101668258=21, srv1437034663=88, srv1173449481=35, srv582652595=301, srv1739043021=144, srv1733173130=143, srv465824154=272, srv14463216=91, srv1720161153=140, srv1549403995=102, srv235920151=227, srv1909060246=179, srv527988350=287, srv1801762669=161, srv89501442=375, srv442994824=269, srv1414012241=83, srv165153258=121, srv1766333515=151, srv2063438865=205, srv1071671801=17, srv1638570398=116, srv1035353226=7, srv1856921753=169, srv1887444158=173, srv1897306674=176, srv1255718022=51, srv1260078897=53, srv1372945218=70, srv1163715139=31, srv175471358=146, srv1558656747=104, srv1463869996=92, srv124825865=49, srv1142495625=26, srv1397803774=77, srv1644508836=117, srv1807320536=162, srv1165273546=32, srv1650978005=120, srv1374260725=71, srv2065239646=206, srv1685737274=134, srv878340336=371, srv329463090=250, srv2112675912=213, srv1378293943=74, srv787532288=343, srv1292867420=59, srv519831391=285, srv1002018470=1, srv822141051=356, srv1229740495=45, srv706370370=321, srv255741565=233, srv1177018836=36, srv1223505925=43, srv745532463=332, srv1820836786=163, srv2127145828=220, srv2124524081=216, srv665150476=316, srv2132621880=223, srv2051928856=203, srv1903063797=178, srv881186303=373, srv1758974023=148, srv270549378=239, srv2014789268=198, srv1663469360=123, srv1331983035=65, srv1768940632=153, srv2084732799=210, srv1043044287=12, srv630246195=309, srv86319792=364, srv37305654=256, srv1650394019=119, srv1888093001=174, srv512441512=280, srv813969264=352, srv277288989=241, srv2017714321=199, srv1410469782=81, srv751917673=333, srv1443060804=89, srv1997063872=195, srv404426071=263, srv1443287861=90, srv695697141=320, srv636958174=310, srv1105584096=22, srv583005569=302, srv92523166=384, srv330226906=251, srv1684865692=133, srv381463497=258, srv567942525=297, srv1010403208=3, srv881516937=374, srv140693587=80, srv1872213858=172, srv262210172=234, srv846799674=358, srv851169364=360, srv880017865=372, srv129190288=58, srv401606217=262, srv669535820=317, srv1325384866=64, srv1377673856=73, srv1416276025=85, srv430431276=266, srv81513922=353, srv2044458062=201, srv2118166427=214, srv1665530216=125, srv2045587532=202, srv1824773168=164, srv2071913725=208, srv1295499145=60, srv1780304939=155, srv612277490=306, srv102508625=6, srv1637539828=115, srv820424989=355, srv50966795=279, srv1950402166=188, srv1207208580=42, srv1057648579=16, srv1084295726=20, srv39165764=260, srv959379519=387, srv2066402828=207, srv1556810592=103, srv1232731779=46, srv1606144164=110, srv1487275322=95, srv519310224=284, srv775221203=338, srv1079168923=19, srv1957834842=189, srv866525142=367, srv243907419=229, srv248553307=230, srv344122075=252, srv467461515=273, srv805609280=349, srv1018507425=4, srv1827511993=166, srv1704639485=137, srv855754935=362, srv1057024901=15, srv1116429721=24, srv927375731=385, srv1383836323=76, srv1584407048=107, srv809779157=351, srv1786622589=159, srv869541705=368, srv1123072042=25, srv1726136626=142, srv135800579=67, srv1958676591=191, srv390748718=259, srv907223095=378, srv76871917=336, srv1160170031=29, srv2119727728=215, srv918100507=381, srv1352063642=66, srv1975716907=193} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:15,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:15,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:15,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:15,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:15,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:15,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:15,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:15,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:15,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:15,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:15,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-17 21:53:15,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-17 21:53:15,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-17 21:53:15,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-17 21:53:15,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-17 21:53:15,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-17 21:53:15,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-17 21:53:15,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-17 21:53:15,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-17 21:53:15,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-17 21:53:15,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-17 21:53:15,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-17 21:53:15,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-17 21:53:15,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-17 21:53:15,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-17 21:53:15,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-17 21:53:15,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-17 21:53:15,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-17 21:53:15,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-17 21:53:15,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-17 21:53:15,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-17 21:53:15,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-17 21:53:15,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-17 21:53:15,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-17 21:53:15,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-17 21:53:15,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-17 21:53:15,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-17 21:53:15,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-17 21:53:15,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-17 21:53:15,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-17 21:53:15,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-17 21:53:15,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-17 21:53:15,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-17 21:53:15,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-17 21:53:15,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-17 21:53:15,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-17 21:53:15,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-17 21:53:15,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-17 21:53:15,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-17 21:53:15,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-17 21:53:15,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-17 21:53:15,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-17 21:53:15,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-17 21:53:15,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-17 21:53:15,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-17 21:53:15,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-17 21:53:15,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-17 21:53:15,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-17 21:53:15,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-17 21:53:15,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-17 21:53:15,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-17 21:53:15,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-17 21:53:15,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-17 21:53:15,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-17 21:53:15,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-17 21:53:15,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-17 21:53:15,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-17 21:53:15,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-17 21:53:15,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-17 21:53:15,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-17 21:53:15,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-17 21:53:15,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-17 21:53:15,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-17 21:53:15,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-17 21:53:15,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-17 21:53:15,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-17 21:53:15,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-17 21:53:15,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-17 21:53:15,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-17 21:53:15,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-17 21:53:15,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-17 21:53:15,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-17 21:53:15,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-17 21:53:15,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-17 21:53:15,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-17 21:53:15,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-17 21:53:15,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-17 21:53:15,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-17 21:53:15,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-17 21:53:15,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-17 21:53:15,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-17 21:53:15,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-17 21:53:15,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-17 21:53:15,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-17 21:53:15,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-17 21:53:15,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-17 21:53:15,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-17 21:53:15,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-17 21:53:15,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-17 21:53:15,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-17 21:53:15,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-17 21:53:15,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-17 21:53:15,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-17 21:53:15,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-17 21:53:15,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-17 21:53:15,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-17 21:53:15,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-17 21:53:15,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-17 21:53:15,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-17 21:53:15,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-17 21:53:15,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-17 21:53:15,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-17 21:53:15,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-17 21:53:15,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-17 21:53:15,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-17 21:53:15,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-17 21:53:15,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-17 21:53:15,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-17 21:53:15,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-17 21:53:15,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-17 21:53:15,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-17 21:53:15,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-17 21:53:15,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-17 21:53:15,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-17 21:53:15,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-17 21:53:15,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-17 21:53:15,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-17 21:53:15,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-17 21:53:15,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-17 21:53:15,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-17 21:53:15,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-17 21:53:15,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-17 21:53:15,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-17 21:53:15,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-17 21:53:15,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-17 21:53:15,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-17 21:53:15,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-17 21:53:15,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-17 21:53:15,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-17 21:53:15,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-17 21:53:15,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-17 21:53:15,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-17 21:53:15,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-17 21:53:15,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-17 21:53:15,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-17 21:53:15,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-17 21:53:15,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-17 21:53:15,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-17 21:53:15,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-17 21:53:15,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-17 21:53:15,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-17 21:53:15,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-17 21:53:15,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-17 21:53:15,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-17 21:53:15,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-17 21:53:15,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-17 21:53:15,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-17 21:53:15,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-17 21:53:15,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-17 21:53:15,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-17 21:53:15,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-17 21:53:15,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-17 21:53:15,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-17 21:53:15,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-17 21:53:15,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-17 21:53:15,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-17 21:53:15,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-17 21:53:15,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-17 21:53:15,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-17 21:53:15,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-17 21:53:15,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-17 21:53:15,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-17 21:53:15,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-17 21:53:15,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-17 21:53:15,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-17 21:53:15,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-17 21:53:15,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-17 21:53:15,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-17 21:53:15,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-17 21:53:15,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-17 21:53:15,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-17 21:53:15,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-17 21:53:15,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-17 21:53:15,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-17 21:53:15,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-17 21:53:15,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-17 21:53:15,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-17 21:53:15,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-17 21:53:15,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-17 21:53:15,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-17 21:53:15,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-17 21:53:15,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-17 21:53:15,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-17 21:53:15,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-17 21:53:15,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-17 21:53:15,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-17 21:53:15,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-17 21:53:15,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-17 21:53:15,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-17 21:53:15,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-17 21:53:15,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-17 21:53:15,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-17 21:53:15,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-17 21:53:15,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-17 21:53:15,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-17 21:53:15,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-17 21:53:15,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-17 21:53:15,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-17 21:53:15,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-17 21:53:15,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-17 21:53:15,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-17 21:53:15,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-17 21:53:15,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-17 21:53:15,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-17 21:53:15,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-17 21:53:15,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-17 21:53:15,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-17 21:53:15,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-17 21:53:15,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-17 21:53:15,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-17 21:53:15,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-17 21:53:15,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-17 21:53:15,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-17 21:53:15,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-17 21:53:15,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-17 21:53:15,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-17 21:53:15,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-17 21:53:15,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-17 21:53:15,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-17 21:53:15,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-17 21:53:15,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-17 21:53:15,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-17 21:53:15,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-17 21:53:15,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-17 21:53:15,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-17 21:53:15,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-17 21:53:15,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-17 21:53:15,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-17 21:53:15,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-17 21:53:15,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-17 21:53:15,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-17 21:53:15,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-17 21:53:15,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-17 21:53:15,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-17 21:53:15,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-17 21:53:15,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-17 21:53:15,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-17 21:53:15,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-17 21:53:15,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-17 21:53:15,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-17 21:53:15,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-17 21:53:15,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-17 21:53:15,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-17 21:53:15,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-17 21:53:15,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-17 21:53:15,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-17 21:53:15,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-17 21:53:15,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-17 21:53:15,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-17 21:53:15,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-17 21:53:15,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-17 21:53:15,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-17 21:53:15,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-17 21:53:15,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-17 21:53:15,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-17 21:53:15,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-17 21:53:15,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-17 21:53:15,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-17 21:53:15,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-17 21:53:15,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-17 21:53:15,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-17 21:53:15,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-17 21:53:15,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-17 21:53:15,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-17 21:53:15,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-17 21:53:15,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-17 21:53:15,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-17 21:53:15,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-17 21:53:15,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-17 21:53:15,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-17 21:53:15,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-17 21:53:15,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-17 21:53:15,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-17 21:53:15,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-17 21:53:15,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-17 21:53:15,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-17 21:53:15,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-17 21:53:15,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-17 21:53:15,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-17 21:53:15,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-17 21:53:15,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-17 21:53:15,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-17 21:53:15,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-17 21:53:15,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-17 21:53:15,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-17 21:53:15,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-17 21:53:15,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-17 21:53:15,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-17 21:53:15,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-17 21:53:15,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-17 21:53:15,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-17 21:53:15,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-17 21:53:15,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-17 21:53:15,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-17 21:53:15,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-17 21:53:15,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-17 21:53:15,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-17 21:53:15,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-17 21:53:15,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-17 21:53:15,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-17 21:53:15,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-17 21:53:15,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-17 21:53:15,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-17 21:53:15,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-17 21:53:15,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-17 21:53:15,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-17 21:53:15,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-17 21:53:15,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-17 21:53:15,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-17 21:53:15,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-17 21:53:15,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-17 21:53:15,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-17 21:53:15,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-17 21:53:15,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-17 21:53:15,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-17 21:53:15,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-17 21:53:15,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-17 21:53:15,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-17 21:53:15,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-17 21:53:15,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-17 21:53:15,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-17 21:53:15,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-17 21:53:15,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-17 21:53:15,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-17 21:53:15,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-17 21:53:15,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-17 21:53:15,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-17 21:53:15,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-17 21:53:15,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-17 21:53:15,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-17 21:53:15,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-17 21:53:15,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-17 21:53:15,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-17 21:53:15,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-17 21:53:15,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-17 21:53:15,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-17 21:53:15,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-17 21:53:15,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-17 21:53:15,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-17 21:53:15,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-17 21:53:15,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-17 21:53:15,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-17 21:53:15,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-17 21:53:15,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-17 21:53:15,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-17 21:53:15,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-17 21:53:15,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-17 21:53:15,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-17 21:53:15,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-17 21:53:15,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-17 21:53:15,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-17 21:53:15,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-17 21:53:15,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-17 21:53:15,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-17 21:53:15,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-17 21:53:15,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-17 21:53:15,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-17 21:53:15,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-17 21:53:15,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-17 21:53:15,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-17 21:53:15,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-17 21:53:15,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-17 21:53:15,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-17 21:53:15,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-17 21:53:15,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-17 21:53:15,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-17 21:53:15,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-17 21:53:15,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-17 21:53:15,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-17 21:53:15,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-17 21:53:15,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-17 21:53:15,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-17 21:53:15,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-17 21:53:15,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-17 21:53:15,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-17 21:53:15,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-17 21:53:15,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-17 21:53:15,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-17 21:53:15,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-17 21:53:15,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-17 21:53:15,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-17 21:53:15,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-17 21:53:15,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-17 21:53:15,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:15,112 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:15,112 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-17 21:53:15,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv871358531=369, srv64697211=312, srv653261481=314, srv1778141916=154, srv716510755=323, srv372169288=255, srv568235512=298, srv710229516=322, srv537137712=293, srv1682791519=131, srv642353994=311, srv1046656068=13, srv993792848=391, srv1202667070=39, srv99567927=392, srv1607947050=111, srv1677371877=129, srv1763526149=150, srv1763378353=149, srv531263272=289, srv448398842=270, srv802808934=348, srv77960001=340, srv453521623=271, srv162773041=114, srv563606057=295, srv1659238910=122, srv1279307656=55, srv1914255334=183, srv1296605582=61, srv2131597846=222, srv1375359355=72, srv1405269336=79, srv175680261=147, srv282211488=242, srv1412891098=82, srv375712549=257, srv191234370=182, srv1574132168=106, srv1853511149=168, srv617306884=307, srv268601623=238, srv1400099806=78, srv477381292=275, srv1279442050=56, srv535853198=292, srv1767480590=152, srv2100700333=211, srv1187847151=37, srv791064637=345, srv74478935=330, srv1206084762=41, srv1497856295=97, srv897884865=377, srv398014971=261, srv786136704=342, srv1429879791=86, srv1201763981=38, srv1415213844=84, srv302220908=243, srv156683359=105, srv1974497084=192, srv535358845=291, srv627763604=308, srv732106437=326, srv1679724304=130, srv576770232=299, srv478480013=276, srv1237250370=47, srv1169018295=34, srv32320833=248, srv594880186=304, srv216306370=225, srv656484240=315, srv818754908=354, srv1321058011=63, srv1256345927=52, srv1670847243=126, srv1515243164=99, srv1781378955=156, srv508388209=278, srv1910886192=180, srv1718898730=139, srv772274482=337, srv1433624807=87, srv848605385=359, srv2107957639=212, srv270591905=240, srv2126706298=219, srv2080681743=209, srv1683990934=132, srv11526364=28, srv761020484=334, srv1720507603=141, srv266276730=236, srv935213051=386, srv923440665=383, srv1911104834=181, srv1944131651=187, srv1162841146=30, srv1921230216=185, srv319459319=247, srv1168022226=33, srv57689659=300, srv716533901=324, srv1255156178=50, srv441379967=267, srv806979625=350, srv788255577=344, srv976533744=389, srv1317853355=62, srv1491073587=96, srv777865249=339, srv2130226580=221, srv873230355=370, srv971370780=388, srv2008207413=197, srv989150800=390, srv737980208=328, srv862088563=363, srv1716783669=138, srv1801293056=160, srv1363984373=68, srv515711115=282, srv1378945327=75, srv17002515=136, srv853498273=361, srv1825292480=165, srv2124576425=217, srv1889349340=175, srv527691188=286, srv1226737728=44, srv1781498156=157, srv104267960=11, srv1663644309=124, srv1672213768=127, srv740402944=329, srv555807163=294, srv566277037=296, srv734882045=327, srv1143683685=27, srv1021400966=5, srv694407347=319, srv1626790310=113, srv303328507=244, srv1869166689=171, srv781623755=341, srv40741117=264, srv1958265988=190, srv592380483=303, srv483565354=277, srv1531731329=100, srv359746409=253, srv1271131029=54, srv1007512250=2, srv1783696565=158, srv1284150263=57, srv1648846971=118, srv120365207=40, srv263085176=235, srv535080964=290, srv824739010=357, srv744793832=331, srv1073394883=18, srv1113186104=23, srv1370321362=69, srv328204461=249, srv1604342762=109, srv266460489=237, srv313806624=245, srv1473408823=93, srv865692144=366, srv42814401=265, srv104065318=10, srv1599236554=108, srv1476834435=94, srv1673452142=128, srv716892727=325, srv1501773847=98, srv791504502=346, srv367902453=254, srv254349567=232, srv2126102976=218, srv252714068=231, srv916506189=380, srv687320190=318, srv1000433998=0, srv51396503=281, srv648464134=313, srv908419423=379, srv204022732=200, srv1901650254=177, srv200342397=196, srv765841762=335, srv1849125656=167, srv235281774=226, srv2137298641=224, srv517347076=283, srv1687711069=135, srv800105834=347, srv1609917009=112, srv1038797815=9, srv863216619=365, srv921796978=382, srv895924009=376, srv319002955=246, srv611122413=305, srv1942590787=186, srv529333113=288, srv1053973741=14, srv1988512138=194, srv1037112526=8, srv442327402=268, srv2062351281=204, srv1240518778=48, srv471289019=274, srv1857090224=170, srv1543025253=101, srv1915241294=184, srv238420451=228, srv1747796150=145, srv1101668258=21, srv1437034663=88, srv1173449481=35, srv582652595=301, srv1739043021=144, srv1733173130=143, srv465824154=272, srv14463216=91, srv1720161153=140, srv1549403995=102, srv235920151=227, srv1909060246=179, srv527988350=287, srv1801762669=161, srv89501442=375, srv442994824=269, srv1414012241=83, srv165153258=121, srv1766333515=151, srv2063438865=205, srv1071671801=17, srv1638570398=116, srv1035353226=7, srv1856921753=169, srv1887444158=173, srv1897306674=176, srv1255718022=51, srv1260078897=53, srv1372945218=70, srv1163715139=31, srv175471358=146, srv1558656747=104, srv1463869996=92, srv124825865=49, srv1142495625=26, srv1397803774=77, srv1644508836=117, srv1807320536=162, srv1165273546=32, srv1650978005=120, srv1374260725=71, srv2065239646=206, srv1685737274=134, srv878340336=371, srv329463090=250, srv2112675912=213, srv1378293943=74, srv787532288=343, srv1292867420=59, srv519831391=285, srv1002018470=1, srv822141051=356, srv1229740495=45, srv706370370=321, srv255741565=233, srv1177018836=36, srv1223505925=43, srv745532463=332, srv1820836786=163, srv2127145828=220, srv2124524081=216, srv665150476=316, srv2132621880=223, srv2051928856=203, srv1903063797=178, srv881186303=373, srv1758974023=148, srv270549378=239, srv2014789268=198, srv1663469360=123, srv1331983035=65, srv1768940632=153, srv2084732799=210, srv1043044287=12, srv630246195=309, srv86319792=364, srv37305654=256, srv1650394019=119, srv1888093001=174, srv512441512=280, srv813969264=352, srv277288989=241, srv2017714321=199, srv1410469782=81, srv751917673=333, srv1443060804=89, srv1997063872=195, srv404426071=263, srv1443287861=90, srv695697141=320, srv636958174=310, srv1105584096=22, srv583005569=302, srv92523166=384, srv330226906=251, srv1684865692=133, srv381463497=258, srv567942525=297, srv1010403208=3, srv881516937=374, srv140693587=80, srv1872213858=172, srv262210172=234, srv846799674=358, srv851169364=360, srv880017865=372, srv129190288=58, srv401606217=262, srv669535820=317, srv1325384866=64, srv1377673856=73, srv1416276025=85, srv430431276=266, srv81513922=353, srv2044458062=201, srv2118166427=214, srv1665530216=125, srv2045587532=202, srv1824773168=164, srv2071913725=208, srv1295499145=60, srv1780304939=155, srv612277490=306, srv102508625=6, srv1637539828=115, srv820424989=355, srv50966795=279, srv1950402166=188, srv1207208580=42, srv1057648579=16, srv1084295726=20, srv39165764=260, srv959379519=387, srv2066402828=207, srv1556810592=103, srv1232731779=46, srv1606144164=110, srv1487275322=95, srv519310224=284, srv775221203=338, srv1079168923=19, srv1957834842=189, srv866525142=367, srv243907419=229, srv248553307=230, srv344122075=252, srv467461515=273, srv805609280=349, srv1018507425=4, srv1827511993=166, srv1704639485=137, srv855754935=362, srv1057024901=15, srv1116429721=24, srv927375731=385, srv1383836323=76, srv1584407048=107, srv809779157=351, srv1786622589=159, srv869541705=368, srv1123072042=25, srv1726136626=142, srv135800579=67, srv1958676591=191, srv390748718=259, srv907223095=378, srv76871917=336, srv1160170031=29, srv2119727728=215, srv918100507=381, srv1352063642=66, srv1975716907=193} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:15,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:15,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:15,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:15,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:15,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:15,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:15,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:15,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:15,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:15,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:15,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-17 21:53:15,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-17 21:53:15,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-17 21:53:15,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-17 21:53:15,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-17 21:53:15,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-17 21:53:15,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-17 21:53:15,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-17 21:53:15,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-17 21:53:15,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-17 21:53:15,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-17 21:53:15,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-17 21:53:15,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-17 21:53:15,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-17 21:53:15,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-17 21:53:15,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-17 21:53:15,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-17 21:53:15,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-17 21:53:15,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-17 21:53:15,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-17 21:53:15,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-17 21:53:15,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-17 21:53:15,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-17 21:53:15,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-17 21:53:15,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-17 21:53:15,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-17 21:53:15,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-17 21:53:15,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-17 21:53:15,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-17 21:53:15,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-17 21:53:15,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-17 21:53:15,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-17 21:53:15,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-17 21:53:15,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-17 21:53:15,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-17 21:53:15,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-17 21:53:15,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-17 21:53:15,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-17 21:53:15,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-17 21:53:15,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-17 21:53:15,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-17 21:53:15,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-17 21:53:15,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-17 21:53:15,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-17 21:53:15,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-17 21:53:15,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-17 21:53:15,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-17 21:53:15,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-17 21:53:15,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-17 21:53:15,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-17 21:53:15,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-17 21:53:15,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-17 21:53:15,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-17 21:53:15,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-17 21:53:15,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-17 21:53:15,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-17 21:53:15,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-17 21:53:15,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-17 21:53:15,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-17 21:53:15,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-17 21:53:15,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-17 21:53:15,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-17 21:53:15,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-17 21:53:15,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-17 21:53:15,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-17 21:53:15,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-17 21:53:15,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-17 21:53:15,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-17 21:53:15,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-17 21:53:15,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-17 21:53:15,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-17 21:53:15,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-17 21:53:15,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-17 21:53:15,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-17 21:53:15,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-17 21:53:15,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-17 21:53:15,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-17 21:53:15,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-17 21:53:15,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-17 21:53:15,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-17 21:53:15,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-17 21:53:15,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-17 21:53:15,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-17 21:53:15,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-17 21:53:15,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-17 21:53:15,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-17 21:53:15,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-17 21:53:15,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-17 21:53:15,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-17 21:53:15,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-17 21:53:15,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-17 21:53:15,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-17 21:53:15,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-17 21:53:15,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-17 21:53:15,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-17 21:53:15,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-17 21:53:15,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-17 21:53:15,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-17 21:53:15,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-17 21:53:15,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-17 21:53:15,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-17 21:53:15,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-17 21:53:15,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-17 21:53:15,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-17 21:53:15,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-17 21:53:15,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-17 21:53:15,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-17 21:53:15,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-17 21:53:15,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-17 21:53:15,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-17 21:53:15,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-17 21:53:15,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-17 21:53:15,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-17 21:53:15,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-17 21:53:15,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-17 21:53:15,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-17 21:53:15,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-17 21:53:15,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-17 21:53:15,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-17 21:53:15,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-17 21:53:15,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-17 21:53:15,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-17 21:53:15,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-17 21:53:15,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-17 21:53:15,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-17 21:53:15,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-17 21:53:15,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-17 21:53:15,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-17 21:53:15,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-17 21:53:15,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-17 21:53:15,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-17 21:53:15,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-17 21:53:15,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-17 21:53:15,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-17 21:53:15,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-17 21:53:15,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-17 21:53:15,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-17 21:53:15,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-17 21:53:15,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-17 21:53:15,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-17 21:53:15,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-17 21:53:15,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-17 21:53:15,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-17 21:53:15,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-17 21:53:15,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-17 21:53:15,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-17 21:53:15,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-17 21:53:15,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-17 21:53:15,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-17 21:53:15,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-17 21:53:15,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-17 21:53:15,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-17 21:53:15,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-17 21:53:15,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-17 21:53:15,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-17 21:53:15,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-17 21:53:15,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-17 21:53:15,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-17 21:53:15,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-17 21:53:15,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-17 21:53:15,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-17 21:53:15,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-17 21:53:15,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-17 21:53:15,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-17 21:53:15,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-17 21:53:15,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-17 21:53:15,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-17 21:53:15,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-17 21:53:15,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-17 21:53:15,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-17 21:53:15,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-17 21:53:15,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-17 21:53:15,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-17 21:53:15,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-17 21:53:15,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-17 21:53:15,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-17 21:53:15,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-17 21:53:15,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-17 21:53:15,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-17 21:53:15,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-17 21:53:15,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-17 21:53:15,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-17 21:53:15,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-17 21:53:15,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-17 21:53:15,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-17 21:53:15,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-17 21:53:15,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-17 21:53:15,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-17 21:53:15,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-17 21:53:15,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-17 21:53:15,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-17 21:53:15,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-17 21:53:15,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-17 21:53:15,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-17 21:53:15,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-17 21:53:15,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-17 21:53:15,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-17 21:53:15,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-17 21:53:15,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-17 21:53:15,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-17 21:53:15,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-17 21:53:15,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-17 21:53:15,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-17 21:53:15,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-17 21:53:15,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-17 21:53:15,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-17 21:53:15,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-17 21:53:15,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-17 21:53:15,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-17 21:53:15,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-17 21:53:15,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-17 21:53:15,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-17 21:53:15,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-17 21:53:15,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-17 21:53:15,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-17 21:53:15,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-17 21:53:15,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-17 21:53:15,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-17 21:53:15,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-17 21:53:15,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-17 21:53:15,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-17 21:53:15,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-17 21:53:15,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-17 21:53:15,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-17 21:53:15,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-17 21:53:15,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-17 21:53:15,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-17 21:53:15,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-17 21:53:15,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-17 21:53:15,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-17 21:53:15,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-17 21:53:15,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-17 21:53:15,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-17 21:53:15,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-17 21:53:15,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-17 21:53:15,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-17 21:53:15,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-17 21:53:15,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-17 21:53:15,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-17 21:53:15,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-17 21:53:15,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-17 21:53:15,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-17 21:53:15,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-17 21:53:15,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-17 21:53:15,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-17 21:53:15,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-17 21:53:15,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-17 21:53:15,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-17 21:53:15,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-17 21:53:15,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-17 21:53:15,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-17 21:53:15,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-17 21:53:15,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-17 21:53:15,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-17 21:53:15,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-17 21:53:15,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-17 21:53:15,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-17 21:53:15,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-17 21:53:15,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-17 21:53:15,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-17 21:53:15,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-17 21:53:15,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-17 21:53:15,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-17 21:53:15,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-17 21:53:15,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-17 21:53:15,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-17 21:53:15,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-17 21:53:15,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-17 21:53:15,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-17 21:53:15,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-17 21:53:15,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-17 21:53:15,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-17 21:53:15,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-17 21:53:15,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-17 21:53:15,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-17 21:53:15,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-17 21:53:15,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-17 21:53:15,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-17 21:53:15,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-17 21:53:15,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-17 21:53:15,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-17 21:53:15,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-17 21:53:15,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-17 21:53:15,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-17 21:53:15,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-17 21:53:15,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-17 21:53:15,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-17 21:53:15,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-17 21:53:15,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-17 21:53:15,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-17 21:53:15,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-17 21:53:15,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-17 21:53:15,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-17 21:53:15,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-17 21:53:15,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-17 21:53:15,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-17 21:53:15,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-17 21:53:15,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-17 21:53:15,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-17 21:53:15,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-17 21:53:15,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-17 21:53:15,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-17 21:53:15,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-17 21:53:15,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-17 21:53:15,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-17 21:53:15,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-17 21:53:15,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-17 21:53:15,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-17 21:53:15,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-17 21:53:15,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-17 21:53:15,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-17 21:53:15,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-17 21:53:15,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-17 21:53:15,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-17 21:53:15,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-17 21:53:15,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-17 21:53:15,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-17 21:53:15,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-17 21:53:15,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-17 21:53:15,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-17 21:53:15,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-17 21:53:15,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-17 21:53:15,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-17 21:53:15,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-17 21:53:15,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-17 21:53:15,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-17 21:53:15,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-17 21:53:15,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-17 21:53:15,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-17 21:53:15,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-17 21:53:15,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-17 21:53:15,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-17 21:53:15,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-17 21:53:15,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-17 21:53:15,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-17 21:53:15,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-17 21:53:15,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-17 21:53:15,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-17 21:53:15,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-17 21:53:15,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-17 21:53:15,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-17 21:53:15,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-17 21:53:15,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-17 21:53:15,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-17 21:53:15,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-17 21:53:15,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-17 21:53:15,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-17 21:53:15,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-17 21:53:15,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-17 21:53:15,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-17 21:53:15,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-17 21:53:15,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-17 21:53:15,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-17 21:53:15,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-17 21:53:15,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-17 21:53:15,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-17 21:53:15,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-17 21:53:15,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-17 21:53:15,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-17 21:53:15,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-17 21:53:15,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-17 21:53:15,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-17 21:53:15,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-17 21:53:15,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-17 21:53:15,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-17 21:53:15,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-17 21:53:15,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-17 21:53:15,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-17 21:53:15,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-17 21:53:15,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-17 21:53:15,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-17 21:53:15,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-17 21:53:15,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-17 21:53:15,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-17 21:53:15,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-17 21:53:15,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-17 21:53:15,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-17 21:53:15,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-17 21:53:15,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-17 21:53:15,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-17 21:53:15,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-17 21:53:15,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-17 21:53:15,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-17 21:53:15,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:15,128 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:15,128 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-17 21:53:15,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv871358531=369, srv64697211=312, srv653261481=314, srv1778141916=154, srv716510755=323, srv372169288=255, srv568235512=298, srv710229516=322, srv537137712=293, srv1682791519=131, srv642353994=311, srv1046656068=13, srv993792848=391, srv1202667070=39, srv99567927=392, srv1607947050=111, srv1677371877=129, srv1763526149=150, srv1763378353=149, srv531263272=289, srv448398842=270, srv802808934=348, srv77960001=340, srv453521623=271, srv162773041=114, srv563606057=295, srv1659238910=122, srv1279307656=55, srv1914255334=183, srv1296605582=61, srv2131597846=222, srv1375359355=72, srv1405269336=79, srv175680261=147, srv282211488=242, srv1412891098=82, srv375712549=257, srv191234370=182, srv1574132168=106, srv1853511149=168, srv617306884=307, srv268601623=238, srv1400099806=78, srv477381292=275, srv1279442050=56, srv535853198=292, srv1767480590=152, srv2100700333=211, srv1187847151=37, srv791064637=345, srv74478935=330, srv1206084762=41, srv1497856295=97, srv897884865=377, srv398014971=261, srv786136704=342, srv1429879791=86, srv1201763981=38, srv1415213844=84, srv302220908=243, srv156683359=105, srv1974497084=192, srv535358845=291, srv627763604=308, srv732106437=326, srv1679724304=130, srv576770232=299, srv478480013=276, srv1237250370=47, srv1169018295=34, srv32320833=248, srv594880186=304, srv216306370=225, srv656484240=315, srv818754908=354, srv1321058011=63, srv1256345927=52, srv1670847243=126, srv1515243164=99, srv1781378955=156, srv508388209=278, srv1910886192=180, srv1718898730=139, srv772274482=337, srv1433624807=87, srv848605385=359, srv2107957639=212, srv270591905=240, srv2126706298=219, srv2080681743=209, srv1683990934=132, srv11526364=28, srv761020484=334, srv1720507603=141, srv266276730=236, srv935213051=386, srv923440665=383, srv1911104834=181, srv1944131651=187, srv1162841146=30, srv1921230216=185, srv319459319=247, srv1168022226=33, srv57689659=300, srv716533901=324, srv1255156178=50, srv441379967=267, srv806979625=350, srv788255577=344, srv976533744=389, srv1317853355=62, srv1491073587=96, srv777865249=339, srv2130226580=221, srv873230355=370, srv971370780=388, srv2008207413=197, srv989150800=390, srv737980208=328, srv862088563=363, srv1716783669=138, srv1801293056=160, srv1363984373=68, srv515711115=282, srv1378945327=75, srv17002515=136, srv853498273=361, srv1825292480=165, srv2124576425=217, srv1889349340=175, srv527691188=286, srv1226737728=44, srv1781498156=157, srv104267960=11, srv1663644309=124, srv1672213768=127, srv740402944=329, srv555807163=294, srv566277037=296, srv734882045=327, srv1143683685=27, srv1021400966=5, srv694407347=319, srv1626790310=113, srv303328507=244, srv1869166689=171, srv781623755=341, srv40741117=264, srv1958265988=190, srv592380483=303, srv483565354=277, srv1531731329=100, srv359746409=253, srv1271131029=54, srv1007512250=2, srv1783696565=158, srv1284150263=57, srv1648846971=118, srv120365207=40, srv263085176=235, srv535080964=290, srv824739010=357, srv744793832=331, srv1073394883=18, srv1113186104=23, srv1370321362=69, srv328204461=249, srv1604342762=109, srv266460489=237, srv313806624=245, srv1473408823=93, srv865692144=366, srv42814401=265, srv104065318=10, srv1599236554=108, srv1476834435=94, srv1673452142=128, srv716892727=325, srv1501773847=98, srv791504502=346, srv367902453=254, srv254349567=232, srv2126102976=218, srv252714068=231, srv916506189=380, srv687320190=318, srv1000433998=0, srv51396503=281, srv648464134=313, srv908419423=379, srv204022732=200, srv1901650254=177, srv200342397=196, srv765841762=335, srv1849125656=167, srv235281774=226, srv2137298641=224, srv517347076=283, srv1687711069=135, srv800105834=347, srv1609917009=112, srv1038797815=9, srv863216619=365, srv921796978=382, srv895924009=376, srv319002955=246, srv611122413=305, srv1942590787=186, srv529333113=288, srv1053973741=14, srv1988512138=194, srv1037112526=8, srv442327402=268, srv2062351281=204, srv1240518778=48, srv471289019=274, srv1857090224=170, srv1543025253=101, srv1915241294=184, srv238420451=228, srv1747796150=145, srv1101668258=21, srv1437034663=88, srv1173449481=35, srv582652595=301, srv1739043021=144, srv1733173130=143, srv465824154=272, srv14463216=91, srv1720161153=140, srv1549403995=102, srv235920151=227, srv1909060246=179, srv527988350=287, srv1801762669=161, srv89501442=375, srv442994824=269, srv1414012241=83, srv165153258=121, srv1766333515=151, srv2063438865=205, srv1071671801=17, srv1638570398=116, srv1035353226=7, srv1856921753=169, srv1887444158=173, srv1897306674=176, srv1255718022=51, srv1260078897=53, srv1372945218=70, srv1163715139=31, srv175471358=146, srv1558656747=104, srv1463869996=92, srv124825865=49, srv1142495625=26, srv1397803774=77, srv1644508836=117, srv1807320536=162, srv1165273546=32, srv1650978005=120, srv1374260725=71, srv2065239646=206, srv1685737274=134, srv878340336=371, srv329463090=250, srv2112675912=213, srv1378293943=74, srv787532288=343, srv1292867420=59, srv519831391=285, srv1002018470=1, srv822141051=356, srv1229740495=45, srv706370370=321, srv255741565=233, srv1177018836=36, srv1223505925=43, srv745532463=332, srv1820836786=163, srv2127145828=220, srv2124524081=216, srv665150476=316, srv2132621880=223, srv2051928856=203, srv1903063797=178, srv881186303=373, srv1758974023=148, srv270549378=239, srv2014789268=198, srv1663469360=123, srv1331983035=65, srv1768940632=153, srv2084732799=210, srv1043044287=12, srv630246195=309, srv86319792=364, srv37305654=256, srv1650394019=119, srv1888093001=174, srv512441512=280, srv813969264=352, srv277288989=241, srv2017714321=199, srv1410469782=81, srv751917673=333, srv1443060804=89, srv1997063872=195, srv404426071=263, srv1443287861=90, srv695697141=320, srv636958174=310, srv1105584096=22, srv583005569=302, srv92523166=384, srv330226906=251, srv1684865692=133, srv381463497=258, srv567942525=297, srv1010403208=3, srv881516937=374, srv140693587=80, srv1872213858=172, srv262210172=234, srv846799674=358, srv851169364=360, srv880017865=372, srv129190288=58, srv401606217=262, srv669535820=317, srv1325384866=64, srv1377673856=73, srv1416276025=85, srv430431276=266, srv81513922=353, srv2044458062=201, srv2118166427=214, srv1665530216=125, srv2045587532=202, srv1824773168=164, srv2071913725=208, srv1295499145=60, srv1780304939=155, srv612277490=306, srv102508625=6, srv1637539828=115, srv820424989=355, srv50966795=279, srv1950402166=188, srv1207208580=42, srv1057648579=16, srv1084295726=20, srv39165764=260, srv959379519=387, srv2066402828=207, srv1556810592=103, srv1232731779=46, srv1606144164=110, srv1487275322=95, srv519310224=284, srv775221203=338, srv1079168923=19, srv1957834842=189, srv866525142=367, srv243907419=229, srv248553307=230, srv344122075=252, srv467461515=273, srv805609280=349, srv1018507425=4, srv1827511993=166, srv1704639485=137, srv855754935=362, srv1057024901=15, srv1116429721=24, srv927375731=385, srv1383836323=76, srv1584407048=107, srv809779157=351, srv1786622589=159, srv869541705=368, srv1123072042=25, srv1726136626=142, srv135800579=67, srv1958676591=191, srv390748718=259, srv907223095=378, srv76871917=336, srv1160170031=29, srv2119727728=215, srv918100507=381, srv1352063642=66, srv1975716907=193} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:15,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:15,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:15,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:15,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:15,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:15,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:15,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:15,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:15,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:15,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:15,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-17 21:53:15,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-17 21:53:15,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-17 21:53:15,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-17 21:53:15,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-17 21:53:15,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-17 21:53:15,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-17 21:53:15,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-17 21:53:15,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-17 21:53:15,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-17 21:53:15,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-17 21:53:15,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-17 21:53:15,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-17 21:53:15,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-17 21:53:15,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-17 21:53:15,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-17 21:53:15,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-17 21:53:15,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-17 21:53:15,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-17 21:53:15,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-17 21:53:15,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-17 21:53:15,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-17 21:53:15,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-17 21:53:15,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-17 21:53:15,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-17 21:53:15,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-17 21:53:15,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-17 21:53:15,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-17 21:53:15,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-17 21:53:15,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-17 21:53:15,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-17 21:53:15,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-17 21:53:15,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-17 21:53:15,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-17 21:53:15,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-17 21:53:15,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-17 21:53:15,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-17 21:53:15,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-17 21:53:15,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-17 21:53:15,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-17 21:53:15,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-17 21:53:15,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-17 21:53:15,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-17 21:53:15,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-17 21:53:15,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-17 21:53:15,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-17 21:53:15,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-17 21:53:15,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-17 21:53:15,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-17 21:53:15,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-17 21:53:15,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-17 21:53:15,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-17 21:53:15,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-17 21:53:15,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-17 21:53:15,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-17 21:53:15,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-17 21:53:15,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-17 21:53:15,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-17 21:53:15,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-17 21:53:15,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-17 21:53:15,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-17 21:53:15,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-17 21:53:15,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-17 21:53:15,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-17 21:53:15,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-17 21:53:15,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-17 21:53:15,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-17 21:53:15,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-17 21:53:15,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-17 21:53:15,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-17 21:53:15,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-17 21:53:15,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-17 21:53:15,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-17 21:53:15,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-17 21:53:15,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-17 21:53:15,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-17 21:53:15,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-17 21:53:15,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-17 21:53:15,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-17 21:53:15,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-17 21:53:15,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-17 21:53:15,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-17 21:53:15,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-17 21:53:15,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-17 21:53:15,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-17 21:53:15,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-17 21:53:15,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-17 21:53:15,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-17 21:53:15,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-17 21:53:15,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-17 21:53:15,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-17 21:53:15,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-17 21:53:15,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-17 21:53:15,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-17 21:53:15,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-17 21:53:15,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-17 21:53:15,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-17 21:53:15,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-17 21:53:15,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-17 21:53:15,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-17 21:53:15,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-17 21:53:15,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-17 21:53:15,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-17 21:53:15,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-17 21:53:15,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-17 21:53:15,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-17 21:53:15,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-17 21:53:15,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-17 21:53:15,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-17 21:53:15,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-17 21:53:15,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-17 21:53:15,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-17 21:53:15,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-17 21:53:15,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-17 21:53:15,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-17 21:53:15,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-17 21:53:15,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-17 21:53:15,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-17 21:53:15,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-17 21:53:15,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-17 21:53:15,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-17 21:53:15,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-17 21:53:15,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-17 21:53:15,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-17 21:53:15,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-17 21:53:15,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-17 21:53:15,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-17 21:53:15,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-17 21:53:15,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-17 21:53:15,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-17 21:53:15,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-17 21:53:15,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-17 21:53:15,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-17 21:53:15,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-17 21:53:15,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-17 21:53:15,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-17 21:53:15,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-17 21:53:15,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-17 21:53:15,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-17 21:53:15,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-17 21:53:15,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-17 21:53:15,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-17 21:53:15,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-17 21:53:15,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-17 21:53:15,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-17 21:53:15,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-17 21:53:15,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-17 21:53:15,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-17 21:53:15,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-17 21:53:15,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-17 21:53:15,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-17 21:53:15,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-17 21:53:15,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-17 21:53:15,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-17 21:53:15,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-17 21:53:15,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-17 21:53:15,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-17 21:53:15,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-17 21:53:15,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-17 21:53:15,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-17 21:53:15,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-17 21:53:15,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-17 21:53:15,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-17 21:53:15,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-17 21:53:15,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-17 21:53:15,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-17 21:53:15,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-17 21:53:15,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-17 21:53:15,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-17 21:53:15,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-17 21:53:15,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-17 21:53:15,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-17 21:53:15,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-17 21:53:15,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-17 21:53:15,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-17 21:53:15,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-17 21:53:15,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-17 21:53:15,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-17 21:53:15,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-17 21:53:15,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-17 21:53:15,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-17 21:53:15,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-17 21:53:15,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-17 21:53:15,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-17 21:53:15,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-17 21:53:15,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-17 21:53:15,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-17 21:53:15,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-17 21:53:15,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-17 21:53:15,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-17 21:53:15,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-17 21:53:15,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-17 21:53:15,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-17 21:53:15,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-17 21:53:15,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-17 21:53:15,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-17 21:53:15,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-17 21:53:15,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-17 21:53:15,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-17 21:53:15,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-17 21:53:15,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-17 21:53:15,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-17 21:53:15,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-17 21:53:15,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-17 21:53:15,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-17 21:53:15,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-17 21:53:15,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-17 21:53:15,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-17 21:53:15,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-17 21:53:15,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-17 21:53:15,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-17 21:53:15,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-17 21:53:15,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-17 21:53:15,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-17 21:53:15,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-17 21:53:15,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-17 21:53:15,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-17 21:53:15,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-17 21:53:15,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-17 21:53:15,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-17 21:53:15,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-17 21:53:15,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-17 21:53:15,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-17 21:53:15,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-17 21:53:15,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-17 21:53:15,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-17 21:53:15,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-17 21:53:15,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-17 21:53:15,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-17 21:53:15,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-17 21:53:15,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-17 21:53:15,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-17 21:53:15,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-17 21:53:15,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-17 21:53:15,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-17 21:53:15,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-17 21:53:15,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-17 21:53:15,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-17 21:53:15,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-17 21:53:15,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-17 21:53:15,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-17 21:53:15,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-17 21:53:15,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-17 21:53:15,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-17 21:53:15,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-17 21:53:15,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-17 21:53:15,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-17 21:53:15,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-17 21:53:15,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-17 21:53:15,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-17 21:53:15,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-17 21:53:15,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-17 21:53:15,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-17 21:53:15,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-17 21:53:15,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-17 21:53:15,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-17 21:53:15,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-17 21:53:15,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-17 21:53:15,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-17 21:53:15,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-17 21:53:15,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-17 21:53:15,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-17 21:53:15,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-17 21:53:15,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-17 21:53:15,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-17 21:53:15,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-17 21:53:15,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-17 21:53:15,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-17 21:53:15,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-17 21:53:15,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-17 21:53:15,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-17 21:53:15,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-17 21:53:15,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-17 21:53:15,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-17 21:53:15,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-17 21:53:15,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-17 21:53:15,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-17 21:53:15,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-17 21:53:15,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-17 21:53:15,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-17 21:53:15,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-17 21:53:15,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-17 21:53:15,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-17 21:53:15,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-17 21:53:15,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-17 21:53:15,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-17 21:53:15,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-17 21:53:15,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-17 21:53:15,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-17 21:53:15,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-17 21:53:15,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-17 21:53:15,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-17 21:53:15,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-17 21:53:15,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-17 21:53:15,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-17 21:53:15,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-17 21:53:15,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-17 21:53:15,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-17 21:53:15,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-17 21:53:15,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-17 21:53:15,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-17 21:53:15,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-17 21:53:15,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-17 21:53:15,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-17 21:53:15,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-17 21:53:15,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-17 21:53:15,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-17 21:53:15,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-17 21:53:15,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-17 21:53:15,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-17 21:53:15,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-17 21:53:15,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-17 21:53:15,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-17 21:53:15,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-17 21:53:15,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-17 21:53:15,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-17 21:53:15,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-17 21:53:15,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-17 21:53:15,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-17 21:53:15,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-17 21:53:15,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-17 21:53:15,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-17 21:53:15,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-17 21:53:15,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-17 21:53:15,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-17 21:53:15,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-17 21:53:15,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-17 21:53:15,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-17 21:53:15,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-17 21:53:15,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-17 21:53:15,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-17 21:53:15,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-17 21:53:15,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-17 21:53:15,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-17 21:53:15,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-17 21:53:15,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-17 21:53:15,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-17 21:53:15,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-17 21:53:15,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-17 21:53:15,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-17 21:53:15,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-17 21:53:15,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-17 21:53:15,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-17 21:53:15,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-17 21:53:15,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-17 21:53:15,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-17 21:53:15,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-17 21:53:15,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-17 21:53:15,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-17 21:53:15,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-17 21:53:15,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-17 21:53:15,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-17 21:53:15,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-17 21:53:15,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-17 21:53:15,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-17 21:53:15,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-17 21:53:15,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-17 21:53:15,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-17 21:53:15,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-17 21:53:15,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-17 21:53:15,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-17 21:53:15,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-17 21:53:15,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-17 21:53:15,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-17 21:53:15,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-17 21:53:15,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-17 21:53:15,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-17 21:53:15,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-17 21:53:15,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-17 21:53:15,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-17 21:53:15,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-17 21:53:15,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-17 21:53:15,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-17 21:53:15,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-17 21:53:15,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-17 21:53:15,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-17 21:53:15,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-17 21:53:15,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-17 21:53:15,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-17 21:53:15,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-17 21:53:15,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-17 21:53:15,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-17 21:53:15,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-17 21:53:15,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:15,143 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:15,143 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table30
2023-07-17 21:53:15,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv871358531=369, srv64697211=312, srv653261481=314, srv1778141916=154, srv716510755=323, srv372169288=255, srv568235512=298, srv710229516=322, srv537137712=293, srv1682791519=131, srv642353994=311, srv1046656068=13, srv993792848=391, srv1202667070=39, srv99567927=392, srv1607947050=111, srv1677371877=129, srv1763526149=150, srv1763378353=149, srv531263272=289, srv448398842=270, srv802808934=348, srv77960001=340, srv453521623=271, srv162773041=114, srv563606057=295, srv1659238910=122, srv1279307656=55, srv1914255334=183, srv1296605582=61, srv2131597846=222, srv1375359355=72, srv1405269336=79, srv175680261=147, srv282211488=242, srv1412891098=82, srv375712549=257, srv191234370=182, srv1574132168=106, srv1853511149=168, srv617306884=307, srv268601623=238, srv1400099806=78, srv477381292=275, srv1279442050=56, srv535853198=292, srv1767480590=152, srv2100700333=211, srv1187847151=37, srv791064637=345, srv74478935=330, srv1206084762=41, srv1497856295=97, srv897884865=377, srv398014971=261, srv786136704=342, srv1429879791=86, srv1201763981=38, srv1415213844=84, srv302220908=243, srv156683359=105, srv1974497084=192, srv535358845=291, srv627763604=308, srv732106437=326, srv1679724304=130, srv576770232=299, srv478480013=276, srv1237250370=47, srv1169018295=34, srv32320833=248, srv594880186=304, srv216306370=225, srv656484240=315, srv818754908=354, srv1321058011=63, srv1256345927=52, srv1670847243=126, srv1515243164=99, srv1781378955=156, srv508388209=278, srv1910886192=180, srv1718898730=139, srv772274482=337, srv1433624807=87, srv848605385=359, srv2107957639=212, srv270591905=240, srv2126706298=219, srv2080681743=209, srv1683990934=132, srv11526364=28, srv761020484=334, srv1720507603=141, srv266276730=236, srv935213051=386, srv923440665=383, srv1911104834=181, srv1944131651=187, srv1162841146=30, srv1921230216=185, srv319459319=247, srv1168022226=33, srv57689659=300, srv716533901=324, srv1255156178=50, srv441379967=267, srv806979625=350, srv788255577=344, srv976533744=389, srv1317853355=62, srv1491073587=96, srv777865249=339, srv2130226580=221, srv873230355=370, srv971370780=388, srv2008207413=197, srv989150800=390, srv737980208=328, srv862088563=363, srv1716783669=138, srv1801293056=160, srv1363984373=68, srv515711115=282, srv1378945327=75, srv17002515=136, srv853498273=361, srv1825292480=165, srv2124576425=217, srv1889349340=175, srv527691188=286, srv1226737728=44, srv1781498156=157, srv104267960=11, srv1663644309=124, srv1672213768=127, srv740402944=329, srv555807163=294, srv566277037=296, srv734882045=327, srv1143683685=27, srv1021400966=5, srv694407347=319, srv1626790310=113, srv303328507=244, srv1869166689=171, srv781623755=341, srv40741117=264, srv1958265988=190, srv592380483=303, srv483565354=277, srv1531731329=100, srv359746409=253, srv1271131029=54, srv1007512250=2, srv1783696565=158, srv1284150263=57, srv1648846971=118, srv120365207=40, srv263085176=235, srv535080964=290, srv824739010=357, srv744793832=331, srv1073394883=18, srv1113186104=23, srv1370321362=69, srv328204461=249, srv1604342762=109, srv266460489=237, srv313806624=245, srv1473408823=93, srv865692144=366, srv42814401=265, srv104065318=10, srv1599236554=108, srv1476834435=94, srv1673452142=128, srv716892727=325, srv1501773847=98, srv791504502=346, srv367902453=254, srv254349567=232, srv2126102976=218, srv252714068=231, srv916506189=380, srv687320190=318, srv1000433998=0, srv51396503=281, srv648464134=313, srv908419423=379, srv204022732=200, srv1901650254=177, srv200342397=196, srv765841762=335, srv1849125656=167, srv235281774=226, srv2137298641=224, srv517347076=283, srv1687711069=135, srv800105834=347, srv1609917009=112, srv1038797815=9, srv863216619=365, srv921796978=382, srv895924009=376, srv319002955=246, srv611122413=305, srv1942590787=186, srv529333113=288, srv1053973741=14, srv1988512138=194, srv1037112526=8, srv442327402=268, srv2062351281=204, srv1240518778=48, srv471289019=274, srv1857090224=170, srv1543025253=101, srv1915241294=184, srv238420451=228, srv1747796150=145, srv1101668258=21, srv1437034663=88, srv1173449481=35, srv582652595=301, srv1739043021=144, srv1733173130=143, srv465824154=272, srv14463216=91, srv1720161153=140, srv1549403995=102, srv235920151=227, srv1909060246=179, srv527988350=287, srv1801762669=161, srv89501442=375, srv442994824=269, srv1414012241=83, srv165153258=121, srv1766333515=151, srv2063438865=205, srv1071671801=17, srv1638570398=116, srv1035353226=7, srv1856921753=169, srv1887444158=173, srv1897306674=176, srv1255718022=51, srv1260078897=53, srv1372945218=70, srv1163715139=31, srv175471358=146, srv1558656747=104, srv1463869996=92, srv124825865=49, srv1142495625=26, srv1397803774=77, srv1644508836=117, srv1807320536=162, srv1165273546=32, srv1650978005=120, srv1374260725=71, srv2065239646=206, srv1685737274=134, srv878340336=371, srv329463090=250, srv2112675912=213, srv1378293943=74, srv787532288=343, srv1292867420=59, srv519831391=285, srv1002018470=1, srv822141051=356, srv1229740495=45, srv706370370=321, srv255741565=233, srv1177018836=36, srv1223505925=43, srv745532463=332, srv1820836786=163, srv2127145828=220, srv2124524081=216, srv665150476=316, srv2132621880=223, srv2051928856=203, srv1903063797=178, srv881186303=373, srv1758974023=148, srv270549378=239, srv2014789268=198, srv1663469360=123, srv1331983035=65, srv1768940632=153, srv2084732799=210, srv1043044287=12, srv630246195=309, srv86319792=364, srv37305654=256, srv1650394019=119, srv1888093001=174, srv512441512=280, srv813969264=352, srv277288989=241, srv2017714321=199, srv1410469782=81, srv751917673=333, srv1443060804=89, srv1997063872=195, srv404426071=263, srv1443287861=90, srv695697141=320, srv636958174=310, srv1105584096=22, srv583005569=302, srv92523166=384, srv330226906=251, srv1684865692=133, srv381463497=258, srv567942525=297, srv1010403208=3, srv881516937=374, srv140693587=80, srv1872213858=172, srv262210172=234, srv846799674=358, srv851169364=360, srv880017865=372, srv129190288=58, srv401606217=262, srv669535820=317, srv1325384866=64, srv1377673856=73, srv1416276025=85, srv430431276=266, srv81513922=353, srv2044458062=201, srv2118166427=214, srv1665530216=125, srv2045587532=202, srv1824773168=164, srv2071913725=208, srv1295499145=60, srv1780304939=155, srv612277490=306, srv102508625=6, srv1637539828=115, srv820424989=355, srv50966795=279, srv1950402166=188, srv1207208580=42, srv1057648579=16, srv1084295726=20, srv39165764=260, srv959379519=387, srv2066402828=207, srv1556810592=103, srv1232731779=46, srv1606144164=110, srv1487275322=95, srv519310224=284, srv775221203=338, srv1079168923=19, srv1957834842=189, srv866525142=367, srv243907419=229, srv248553307=230, srv344122075=252, srv467461515=273, srv805609280=349, srv1018507425=4, srv1827511993=166, srv1704639485=137, srv855754935=362, srv1057024901=15, srv1116429721=24, srv927375731=385, srv1383836323=76, srv1584407048=107, srv809779157=351, srv1786622589=159, srv869541705=368, srv1123072042=25, srv1726136626=142, srv135800579=67, srv1958676591=191, srv390748718=259, srv907223095=378, srv76871917=336, srv1160170031=29, srv2119727728=215, srv918100507=381, srv1352063642=66, srv1975716907=193} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:15,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:15,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:15,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:15,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:15,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:15,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:15,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:15,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:15,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:15,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:15,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-17 21:53:15,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-17 21:53:15,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-17 21:53:15,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-17 21:53:15,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-17 21:53:15,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-17 21:53:15,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-17 21:53:15,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-17 21:53:15,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-17 21:53:15,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-17 21:53:15,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-17 21:53:15,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-17 21:53:15,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-17 21:53:15,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-17 21:53:15,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-17 21:53:15,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-17 21:53:15,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-17 21:53:15,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-17 21:53:15,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-17 21:53:15,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-17 21:53:15,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-17 21:53:15,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-17 21:53:15,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-17 21:53:15,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-17 21:53:15,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-17 21:53:15,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-17 21:53:15,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-17 21:53:15,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-17 21:53:15,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-17 21:53:15,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-17 21:53:15,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-17 21:53:15,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-17 21:53:15,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-17 21:53:15,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-17 21:53:15,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-17 21:53:15,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-17 21:53:15,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-17 21:53:15,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-17 21:53:15,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-17 21:53:15,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-17 21:53:15,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-17 21:53:15,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-17 21:53:15,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-17 21:53:15,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-17 21:53:15,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-17 21:53:15,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-17 21:53:15,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-17 21:53:15,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-17 21:53:15,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-17 21:53:15,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-17 21:53:15,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-17 21:53:15,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-17 21:53:15,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-17 21:53:15,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-17 21:53:15,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-17 21:53:15,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-17 21:53:15,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-17 21:53:15,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-17 21:53:15,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-17 21:53:15,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-17 21:53:15,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-17 21:53:15,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-17 21:53:15,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-17 21:53:15,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-17 21:53:15,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-17 21:53:15,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-17 21:53:15,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-17 21:53:15,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-17 21:53:15,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-17 21:53:15,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-17 21:53:15,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-17 21:53:15,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-17 21:53:15,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-17 21:53:15,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-17 21:53:15,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-17 21:53:15,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-17 21:53:15,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-17 21:53:15,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-17 21:53:15,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-17 21:53:15,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-17 21:53:15,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-17 21:53:15,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-17 21:53:15,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-17 21:53:15,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-17 21:53:15,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-17 21:53:15,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-17 21:53:15,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-17 21:53:15,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-17 21:53:15,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-17 21:53:15,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-17 21:53:15,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-17 21:53:15,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-17 21:53:15,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-17 21:53:15,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-17 21:53:15,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-17 21:53:15,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-17 21:53:15,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-17 21:53:15,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-17 21:53:15,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-17 21:53:15,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-17 21:53:15,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-17 21:53:15,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-17 21:53:15,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-17 21:53:15,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-17 21:53:15,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-17 21:53:15,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-17 21:53:15,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-17 21:53:15,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-17 21:53:15,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-17 21:53:15,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-17 21:53:15,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-17 21:53:15,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-17 21:53:15,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-17 21:53:15,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-17 21:53:15,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-17 21:53:15,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-17 21:53:15,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-17 21:53:15,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-17 21:53:15,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-17 21:53:15,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-17 21:53:15,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-17 21:53:15,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-17 21:53:15,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-17 21:53:15,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-17 21:53:15,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-17 21:53:15,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-17 21:53:15,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-17 21:53:15,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-17 21:53:15,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-17 21:53:15,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-17 21:53:15,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-17 21:53:15,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-17 21:53:15,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-17 21:53:15,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-17 21:53:15,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-17 21:53:15,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-17 21:53:15,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-17 21:53:15,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-17 21:53:15,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-17 21:53:15,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-17 21:53:15,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-17 21:53:15,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-17 21:53:15,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-17 21:53:15,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-17 21:53:15,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-17 21:53:15,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-17 21:53:15,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-17 21:53:15,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-17 21:53:15,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-17 21:53:15,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-17 21:53:15,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-17 21:53:15,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-17 21:53:15,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-17 21:53:15,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-17 21:53:15,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-17 21:53:15,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-17 21:53:15,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-17 21:53:15,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-17 21:53:15,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-17 21:53:15,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-17 21:53:15,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-17 21:53:15,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-17 21:53:15,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-17 21:53:15,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-17 21:53:15,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-17 21:53:15,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-17 21:53:15,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-17 21:53:15,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-17 21:53:15,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-17 21:53:15,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-17 21:53:15,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-17 21:53:15,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-17 21:53:15,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-17 21:53:15,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-17 21:53:15,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-17 21:53:15,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-17 21:53:15,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-17 21:53:15,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-17 21:53:15,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-17 21:53:15,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-17 21:53:15,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-17 21:53:15,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-17 21:53:15,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-17 21:53:15,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-17 21:53:15,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-17 21:53:15,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-17 21:53:15,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-17 21:53:15,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-17 21:53:15,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-17 21:53:15,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-17 21:53:15,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-17 21:53:15,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-17 21:53:15,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-17 21:53:15,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-17 21:53:15,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-17 21:53:15,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-17 21:53:15,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-17 21:53:15,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-17 21:53:15,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-17 21:53:15,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-17 21:53:15,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-17 21:53:15,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-17 21:53:15,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-17 21:53:15,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-17 21:53:15,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-17 21:53:15,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-17 21:53:15,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-17 21:53:15,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-17 21:53:15,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-17 21:53:15,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-17 21:53:15,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-17 21:53:15,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-17 21:53:15,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-17 21:53:15,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-17 21:53:15,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-17 21:53:15,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-17 21:53:15,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-17 21:53:15,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-17 21:53:15,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-17 21:53:15,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-17 21:53:15,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-17 21:53:15,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-17 21:53:15,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-17 21:53:15,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-17 21:53:15,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-17 21:53:15,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-17 21:53:15,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-17 21:53:15,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-17 21:53:15,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-17 21:53:15,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-17 21:53:15,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-17 21:53:15,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-17 21:53:15,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-17 21:53:15,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-17 21:53:15,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-17 21:53:15,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-17 21:53:15,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-17 21:53:15,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-17 21:53:15,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-17 21:53:15,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-17 21:53:15,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-17 21:53:15,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-17 21:53:15,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-17 21:53:15,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-17 21:53:15,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-17 21:53:15,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-17 21:53:15,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-17 21:53:15,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-17 21:53:15,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-17 21:53:15,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-17 21:53:15,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-17 21:53:15,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-17 21:53:15,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-17 21:53:15,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-17 21:53:15,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-17 21:53:15,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-17 21:53:15,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-17 21:53:15,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-17 21:53:15,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-17 21:53:15,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-17 21:53:15,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-17 21:53:15,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-17 21:53:15,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-17 21:53:15,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-17 21:53:15,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-17 21:53:15,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-17 21:53:15,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-17 21:53:15,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-17 21:53:15,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-17 21:53:15,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-17 21:53:15,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-17 21:53:15,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-17 21:53:15,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-17 21:53:15,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-17 21:53:15,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-17 21:53:15,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-17 21:53:15,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-17 21:53:15,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-17 21:53:15,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-17 21:53:15,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-17 21:53:15,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-17 21:53:15,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-17 21:53:15,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-17 21:53:15,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-17 21:53:15,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-17 21:53:15,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-17 21:53:15,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-17 21:53:15,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-17 21:53:15,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-17 21:53:15,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-17 21:53:15,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-17 21:53:15,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-17 21:53:15,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-17 21:53:15,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-17 21:53:15,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-17 21:53:15,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-17 21:53:15,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-17 21:53:15,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-17 21:53:15,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-17 21:53:15,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-17 21:53:15,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-17 21:53:15,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-17 21:53:15,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-17 21:53:15,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-17 21:53:15,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-17 21:53:15,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-17 21:53:15,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-17 21:53:15,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-17 21:53:15,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-17 21:53:15,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-17 21:53:15,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-17 21:53:15,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-17 21:53:15,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-17 21:53:15,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-17 21:53:15,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-17 21:53:15,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-17 21:53:15,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-17 21:53:15,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-17 21:53:15,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-17 21:53:15,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-17 21:53:15,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-17 21:53:15,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-17 21:53:15,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-17 21:53:15,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-17 21:53:15,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-17 21:53:15,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-17 21:53:15,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-17 21:53:15,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-17 21:53:15,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-17 21:53:15,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-17 21:53:15,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-17 21:53:15,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-17 21:53:15,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-17 21:53:15,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-17 21:53:15,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-17 21:53:15,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-17 21:53:15,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-17 21:53:15,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-17 21:53:15,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-17 21:53:15,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-17 21:53:15,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-17 21:53:15,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-17 21:53:15,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-17 21:53:15,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-17 21:53:15,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-17 21:53:15,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-17 21:53:15,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-17 21:53:15,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-17 21:53:15,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-17 21:53:15,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-17 21:53:15,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-17 21:53:15,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-17 21:53:15,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-17 21:53:15,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-17 21:53:15,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-17 21:53:15,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-17 21:53:15,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-17 21:53:15,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-17 21:53:15,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-17 21:53:15,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-17 21:53:15,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-17 21:53:15,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-17 21:53:15,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-17 21:53:15,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-17 21:53:15,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-17 21:53:15,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-17 21:53:15,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-17 21:53:15,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-17 21:53:15,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-17 21:53:15,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-17 21:53:15,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-17 21:53:15,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-17 21:53:15,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-17 21:53:15,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-17 21:53:15,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-17 21:53:15,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-17 21:53:15,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-17 21:53:15,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-17 21:53:15,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-17 21:53:15,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-17 21:53:15,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-17 21:53:15,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-17 21:53:15,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-17 21:53:15,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:15,158 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table30) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:15,158 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table9
2023-07-17 21:53:15,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv871358531=369, srv64697211=312, srv653261481=314, srv1778141916=154, srv716510755=323, srv372169288=255, srv568235512=298, srv710229516=322, srv537137712=293, srv1682791519=131, srv642353994=311, srv1046656068=13, srv993792848=391, srv1202667070=39, srv99567927=392, srv1607947050=111, srv1677371877=129, srv1763526149=150, srv1763378353=149, srv531263272=289, srv448398842=270, srv802808934=348, srv77960001=340, srv453521623=271, srv162773041=114, srv563606057=295, srv1659238910=122, srv1279307656=55, srv1914255334=183, srv1296605582=61, srv2131597846=222, srv1375359355=72, srv1405269336=79, srv175680261=147, srv282211488=242, srv1412891098=82, srv375712549=257, srv191234370=182, srv1574132168=106, srv1853511149=168, srv617306884=307, srv268601623=238, srv1400099806=78, srv477381292=275, srv1279442050=56, srv535853198=292, srv1767480590=152, srv2100700333=211, srv1187847151=37, srv791064637=345, srv74478935=330, srv1206084762=41, srv1497856295=97, srv897884865=377, srv398014971=261, srv786136704=342, srv1429879791=86, srv1201763981=38, srv1415213844=84, srv302220908=243, srv156683359=105, srv1974497084=192, srv535358845=291, srv627763604=308, srv732106437=326, srv1679724304=130, srv576770232=299, srv478480013=276, srv1237250370=47, srv1169018295=34, srv32320833=248, srv594880186=304, srv216306370=225, srv656484240=315, srv818754908=354, srv1321058011=63, srv1256345927=52, srv1670847243=126, srv1515243164=99, srv1781378955=156, srv508388209=278, srv1910886192=180, srv1718898730=139, srv772274482=337, srv1433624807=87, srv848605385=359, srv2107957639=212, srv270591905=240, srv2126706298=219, srv2080681743=209, srv1683990934=132, srv11526364=28, srv761020484=334, srv1720507603=141, srv266276730=236, srv935213051=386, srv923440665=383, srv1911104834=181, srv1944131651=187, srv1162841146=30, srv1921230216=185, srv319459319=247, srv1168022226=33, srv57689659=300, srv716533901=324, srv1255156178=50, srv441379967=267, srv806979625=350, srv788255577=344, srv976533744=389, srv1317853355=62, srv1491073587=96, srv777865249=339, srv2130226580=221, srv873230355=370, srv971370780=388, srv2008207413=197, srv989150800=390, srv737980208=328, srv862088563=363, srv1716783669=138, srv1801293056=160, srv1363984373=68, srv515711115=282, srv1378945327=75, srv17002515=136, srv853498273=361, srv1825292480=165, srv2124576425=217, srv1889349340=175, srv527691188=286, srv1226737728=44, srv1781498156=157, srv104267960=11, srv1663644309=124, srv1672213768=127, srv740402944=329, srv555807163=294, srv566277037=296, srv734882045=327, srv1143683685=27, srv1021400966=5, srv694407347=319, srv1626790310=113, srv303328507=244, srv1869166689=171, srv781623755=341, srv40741117=264, srv1958265988=190, srv592380483=303, srv483565354=277, srv1531731329=100, srv359746409=253, srv1271131029=54, srv1007512250=2, srv1783696565=158, srv1284150263=57, srv1648846971=118, srv120365207=40, srv263085176=235, srv535080964=290, srv824739010=357, srv744793832=331, srv1073394883=18, srv1113186104=23, srv1370321362=69, srv328204461=249, srv1604342762=109, srv266460489=237, srv313806624=245, srv1473408823=93, srv865692144=366, srv42814401=265, srv104065318=10, srv1599236554=108, srv1476834435=94, srv1673452142=128, srv716892727=325, srv1501773847=98, srv791504502=346, srv367902453=254, srv254349567=232, srv2126102976=218, srv252714068=231, srv916506189=380, srv687320190=318, srv1000433998=0, srv51396503=281, srv648464134=313, srv908419423=379, srv204022732=200, srv1901650254=177, srv200342397=196, srv765841762=335, srv1849125656=167, srv235281774=226, srv2137298641=224, srv517347076=283, srv1687711069=135, srv800105834=347, srv1609917009=112, srv1038797815=9, srv863216619=365, srv921796978=382, srv895924009=376, srv319002955=246, srv611122413=305, srv1942590787=186, srv529333113=288, srv1053973741=14, srv1988512138=194, srv1037112526=8, srv442327402=268, srv2062351281=204, srv1240518778=48, srv471289019=274, srv1857090224=170, srv1543025253=101, srv1915241294=184, srv238420451=228, srv1747796150=145, srv1101668258=21, srv1437034663=88, srv1173449481=35, srv582652595=301, srv1739043021=144, srv1733173130=143, srv465824154=272, srv14463216=91, srv1720161153=140, srv1549403995=102, srv235920151=227, srv1909060246=179, srv527988350=287, srv1801762669=161, srv89501442=375, srv442994824=269, srv1414012241=83, srv165153258=121, srv1766333515=151, srv2063438865=205, srv1071671801=17, srv1638570398=116, srv1035353226=7, srv1856921753=169, srv1887444158=173, srv1897306674=176, srv1255718022=51, srv1260078897=53, srv1372945218=70, srv1163715139=31, srv175471358=146, srv1558656747=104, srv1463869996=92, srv124825865=49, srv1142495625=26, srv1397803774=77, srv1644508836=117, srv1807320536=162, srv1165273546=32, srv1650978005=120, srv1374260725=71, srv2065239646=206, srv1685737274=134, srv878340336=371, srv329463090=250, srv2112675912=213, srv1378293943=74, srv787532288=343, srv1292867420=59, srv519831391=285, srv1002018470=1, srv822141051=356, srv1229740495=45, srv706370370=321, srv255741565=233, srv1177018836=36, srv1223505925=43, srv745532463=332, srv1820836786=163, srv2127145828=220, srv2124524081=216, srv665150476=316, srv2132621880=223, srv2051928856=203, srv1903063797=178, srv881186303=373, srv1758974023=148, srv270549378=239, srv2014789268=198, srv1663469360=123, srv1331983035=65, srv1768940632=153, srv2084732799=210, srv1043044287=12, srv630246195=309, srv86319792=364, srv37305654=256, srv1650394019=119, srv1888093001=174, srv512441512=280, srv813969264=352, srv277288989=241, srv2017714321=199, srv1410469782=81, srv751917673=333, srv1443060804=89, srv1997063872=195, srv404426071=263, srv1443287861=90, srv695697141=320, srv636958174=310, srv1105584096=22, srv583005569=302, srv92523166=384, srv330226906=251, srv1684865692=133, srv381463497=258, srv567942525=297, srv1010403208=3, srv881516937=374, srv140693587=80, srv1872213858=172, srv262210172=234, srv846799674=358, srv851169364=360, srv880017865=372, srv129190288=58, srv401606217=262, srv669535820=317, srv1325384866=64, srv1377673856=73, srv1416276025=85, srv430431276=266, srv81513922=353, srv2044458062=201, srv2118166427=214, srv1665530216=125, srv2045587532=202, srv1824773168=164, srv2071913725=208, srv1295499145=60, srv1780304939=155, srv612277490=306, srv102508625=6, srv1637539828=115, srv820424989=355, srv50966795=279, srv1950402166=188, srv1207208580=42, srv1057648579=16, srv1084295726=20, srv39165764=260, srv959379519=387, srv2066402828=207, srv1556810592=103, srv1232731779=46, srv1606144164=110, srv1487275322=95, srv519310224=284, srv775221203=338, srv1079168923=19, srv1957834842=189, srv866525142=367, srv243907419=229, srv248553307=230, srv344122075=252, srv467461515=273, srv805609280=349, srv1018507425=4, srv1827511993=166, srv1704639485=137, srv855754935=362, srv1057024901=15, srv1116429721=24, srv927375731=385, srv1383836323=76, srv1584407048=107, srv809779157=351, srv1786622589=159, srv869541705=368, srv1123072042=25, srv1726136626=142, srv135800579=67, srv1958676591=191, srv390748718=259, srv907223095=378, srv76871917=336, srv1160170031=29, srv2119727728=215, srv918100507=381, srv1352063642=66, srv1975716907=193} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:15,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:15,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:15,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:15,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:15,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:15,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:15,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:15,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:15,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:15,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:15,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-17 21:53:15,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-17 21:53:15,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-17 21:53:15,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-17 21:53:15,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-17 21:53:15,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-17 21:53:15,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-17 21:53:15,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-17 21:53:15,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-17 21:53:15,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-17 21:53:15,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-17 21:53:15,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-17 21:53:15,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-17 21:53:15,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-17 21:53:15,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-17 21:53:15,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-17 21:53:15,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-17 21:53:15,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-17 21:53:15,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-17 21:53:15,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-17 21:53:15,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-17 21:53:15,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-17 21:53:15,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-17 21:53:15,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-17 21:53:15,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-17 21:53:15,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-17 21:53:15,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-17 21:53:15,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-17 21:53:15,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-17 21:53:15,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-17 21:53:15,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-17 21:53:15,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-17 21:53:15,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-17 21:53:15,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-17 21:53:15,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-17 21:53:15,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-17 21:53:15,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-17 21:53:15,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-17 21:53:15,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-17 21:53:15,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-17 21:53:15,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-17 21:53:15,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-17 21:53:15,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-17 21:53:15,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-17 21:53:15,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-17 21:53:15,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-17 21:53:15,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-17 21:53:15,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-17 21:53:15,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-17 21:53:15,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-17 21:53:15,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-17 21:53:15,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-17 21:53:15,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-17 21:53:15,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-17 21:53:15,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-17 21:53:15,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-17 21:53:15,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-17 21:53:15,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-17 21:53:15,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-17 21:53:15,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-17 21:53:15,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-17 21:53:15,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-17 21:53:15,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-17 21:53:15,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-17 21:53:15,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-17 21:53:15,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-17 21:53:15,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-17 21:53:15,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-17 21:53:15,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-17 21:53:15,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-17 21:53:15,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-17 21:53:15,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-17 21:53:15,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-17 21:53:15,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-17 21:53:15,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-17 21:53:15,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-17 21:53:15,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-17 21:53:15,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-17 21:53:15,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-17 21:53:15,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-17 21:53:15,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-17 21:53:15,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-17 21:53:15,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-17 21:53:15,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-17 21:53:15,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-17 21:53:15,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-17 21:53:15,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-17 21:53:15,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-17 21:53:15,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-17 21:53:15,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-17 21:53:15,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-17 21:53:15,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-17 21:53:15,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-17 21:53:15,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-17 21:53:15,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-17 21:53:15,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-17 21:53:15,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-17 21:53:15,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-17 21:53:15,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-17 21:53:15,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-17 21:53:15,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-17 21:53:15,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-17 21:53:15,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-17 21:53:15,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-17 21:53:15,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-17 21:53:15,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-17 21:53:15,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-17 21:53:15,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-17 21:53:15,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-17 21:53:15,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-17 21:53:15,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-17 21:53:15,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-17 21:53:15,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-17 21:53:15,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-17 21:53:15,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-17 21:53:15,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-17 21:53:15,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-17 21:53:15,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-17 21:53:15,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-17 21:53:15,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-17 21:53:15,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-17 21:53:15,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-17 21:53:15,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-17 21:53:15,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-17 21:53:15,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-17 21:53:15,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-17 21:53:15,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-17 21:53:15,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-17 21:53:15,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-17 21:53:15,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-17 21:53:15,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-17 21:53:15,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-17 21:53:15,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-17 21:53:15,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-17 21:53:15,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-17 21:53:15,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-17 21:53:15,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-17 21:53:15,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-17 21:53:15,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-17 21:53:15,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-17 21:53:15,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-17 21:53:15,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-17 21:53:15,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-17 21:53:15,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-17 21:53:15,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-17 21:53:15,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-17 21:53:15,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-17 21:53:15,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-17 21:53:15,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-17 21:53:15,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-17 21:53:15,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-17 21:53:15,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-17 21:53:15,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-17 21:53:15,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-17 21:53:15,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-17 21:53:15,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-17 21:53:15,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-17 21:53:15,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-17 21:53:15,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-17 21:53:15,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-17 21:53:15,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-17 21:53:15,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-17 21:53:15,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-17 21:53:15,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-17 21:53:15,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-17 21:53:15,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-17 21:53:15,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-17 21:53:15,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-17 21:53:15,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-17 21:53:15,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-17 21:53:15,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-17 21:53:15,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-17 21:53:15,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-17 21:53:15,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-17 21:53:15,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-17 21:53:15,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-17 21:53:15,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-17 21:53:15,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-17 21:53:15,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-17 21:53:15,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-17 21:53:15,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-17 21:53:15,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-17 21:53:15,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-17 21:53:15,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-17 21:53:15,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-17 21:53:15,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-17 21:53:15,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-17 21:53:15,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-17 21:53:15,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-17 21:53:15,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-17 21:53:15,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-17 21:53:15,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-17 21:53:15,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-17 21:53:15,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-17 21:53:15,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-17 21:53:15,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-17 21:53:15,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-17 21:53:15,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-17 21:53:15,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-17 21:53:15,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-17 21:53:15,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-17 21:53:15,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-17 21:53:15,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-17 21:53:15,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-17 21:53:15,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-17 21:53:15,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-17 21:53:15,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-17 21:53:15,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-17 21:53:15,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-17 21:53:15,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-17 21:53:15,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-17 21:53:15,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-17 21:53:15,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-17 21:53:15,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-17 21:53:15,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-17 21:53:15,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-17 21:53:15,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-17 21:53:15,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-17 21:53:15,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-17 21:53:15,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-17 21:53:15,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-17 21:53:15,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-17 21:53:15,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-17 21:53:15,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-17 21:53:15,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-17 21:53:15,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-17 21:53:15,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-17 21:53:15,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-17 21:53:15,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-17 21:53:15,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-17 21:53:15,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-17 21:53:15,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-17 21:53:15,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-17 21:53:15,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-17 21:53:15,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-17 21:53:15,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-17 21:53:15,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-17 21:53:15,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-17 21:53:15,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-17 21:53:15,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-17 21:53:15,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-17 21:53:15,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-17 21:53:15,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-17 21:53:15,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-17 21:53:15,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-17 21:53:15,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-17 21:53:15,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-17 21:53:15,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-17 21:53:15,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-17 21:53:15,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-17 21:53:15,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-17 21:53:15,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-17 21:53:15,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-17 21:53:15,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-17 21:53:15,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-17 21:53:15,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-17 21:53:15,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-17 21:53:15,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-17 21:53:15,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-17 21:53:15,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-17 21:53:15,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-17 21:53:15,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-17 21:53:15,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-17 21:53:15,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-17 21:53:15,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-17 21:53:15,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-17 21:53:15,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-17 21:53:15,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-17 21:53:15,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-17 21:53:15,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-17 21:53:15,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-17 21:53:15,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-17 21:53:15,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-17 21:53:15,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-17 21:53:15,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-17 21:53:15,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-17 21:53:15,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-17 21:53:15,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-17 21:53:15,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-17 21:53:15,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-17 21:53:15,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-17 21:53:15,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-17 21:53:15,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-17 21:53:15,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-17 21:53:15,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-17 21:53:15,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-17 21:53:15,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-17 21:53:15,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-17 21:53:15,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-17 21:53:15,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-17 21:53:15,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-17 21:53:15,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-17 21:53:15,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-17 21:53:15,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-17 21:53:15,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-17 21:53:15,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-17 21:53:15,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-17 21:53:15,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-17 21:53:15,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-17 21:53:15,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-17 21:53:15,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-17 21:53:15,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-17 21:53:15,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-17 21:53:15,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-17 21:53:15,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-17 21:53:15,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-17 21:53:15,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-17 21:53:15,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-17 21:53:15,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-17 21:53:15,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-17 21:53:15,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-17 21:53:15,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-17 21:53:15,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-17 21:53:15,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-17 21:53:15,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-17 21:53:15,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-17 21:53:15,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-17 21:53:15,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-17 21:53:15,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-17 21:53:15,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-17 21:53:15,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-17 21:53:15,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-17 21:53:15,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-17 21:53:15,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-17 21:53:15,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-17 21:53:15,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-17 21:53:15,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-17 21:53:15,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-17 21:53:15,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-17 21:53:15,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-17 21:53:15,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-17 21:53:15,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-17 21:53:15,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-17 21:53:15,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-17 21:53:15,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-17 21:53:15,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-17 21:53:15,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-17 21:53:15,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-17 21:53:15,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-17 21:53:15,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-17 21:53:15,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-17 21:53:15,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-17 21:53:15,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-17 21:53:15,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-17 21:53:15,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-17 21:53:15,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-17 21:53:15,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-17 21:53:15,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-17 21:53:15,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-17 21:53:15,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-17 21:53:15,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-17 21:53:15,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-17 21:53:15,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-17 21:53:15,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-17 21:53:15,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-17 21:53:15,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-17 21:53:15,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-17 21:53:15,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-17 21:53:15,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-17 21:53:15,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-17 21:53:15,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-17 21:53:15,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-17 21:53:15,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-17 21:53:15,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-17 21:53:15,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-17 21:53:15,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-17 21:53:15,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-17 21:53:15,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-17 21:53:15,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-17 21:53:15,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-17 21:53:15,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-17 21:53:15,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-17 21:53:15,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-17 21:53:15,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-17 21:53:15,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-17 21:53:15,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-17 21:53:15,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-17 21:53:15,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-17 21:53:15,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-17 21:53:15,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-17 21:53:15,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-17 21:53:15,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-17 21:53:15,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-17 21:53:15,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:15,174 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table9) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:15,174 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table31
2023-07-17 21:53:15,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv871358531=369, srv64697211=312, srv653261481=314, srv1778141916=154, srv716510755=323, srv372169288=255, srv568235512=298, srv710229516=322, srv537137712=293, srv1682791519=131, srv642353994=311, srv1046656068=13, srv993792848=391, srv1202667070=39, srv99567927=392, srv1607947050=111, srv1677371877=129, srv1763526149=150, srv1763378353=149, srv531263272=289, srv448398842=270, srv802808934=348, srv77960001=340, srv453521623=271, srv162773041=114, srv563606057=295, srv1659238910=122, srv1279307656=55, srv1914255334=183, srv1296605582=61, srv2131597846=222, srv1375359355=72, srv1405269336=79, srv175680261=147, srv282211488=242, srv1412891098=82, srv375712549=257, srv191234370=182, srv1574132168=106, srv1853511149=168, srv617306884=307, srv268601623=238, srv1400099806=78, srv477381292=275, srv1279442050=56, srv535853198=292, srv1767480590=152, srv2100700333=211, srv1187847151=37, srv791064637=345, srv74478935=330, srv1206084762=41, srv1497856295=97, srv897884865=377, srv398014971=261, srv786136704=342, srv1429879791=86, srv1201763981=38, srv1415213844=84, srv302220908=243, srv156683359=105, srv1974497084=192, srv535358845=291, srv627763604=308, srv732106437=326, srv1679724304=130, srv576770232=299, srv478480013=276, srv1237250370=47, srv1169018295=34, srv32320833=248, srv594880186=304, srv216306370=225, srv656484240=315, srv818754908=354, srv1321058011=63, srv1256345927=52, srv1670847243=126, srv1515243164=99, srv1781378955=156, srv508388209=278, srv1910886192=180, srv1718898730=139, srv772274482=337, srv1433624807=87, srv848605385=359, srv2107957639=212, srv270591905=240, srv2126706298=219, srv2080681743=209, srv1683990934=132, srv11526364=28, srv761020484=334, srv1720507603=141, srv266276730=236, srv935213051=386, srv923440665=383, srv1911104834=181, srv1944131651=187, srv1162841146=30, srv1921230216=185, srv319459319=247, srv1168022226=33, srv57689659=300, srv716533901=324, srv1255156178=50, srv441379967=267, srv806979625=350, srv788255577=344, srv976533744=389, srv1317853355=62, srv1491073587=96, srv777865249=339, srv2130226580=221, srv873230355=370, srv971370780=388, srv2008207413=197, srv989150800=390, srv737980208=328, srv862088563=363, srv1716783669=138, srv1801293056=160, srv1363984373=68, srv515711115=282, srv1378945327=75, srv17002515=136, srv853498273=361, srv1825292480=165, srv2124576425=217, srv1889349340=175, srv527691188=286, srv1226737728=44, srv1781498156=157, srv104267960=11, srv1663644309=124, srv1672213768=127, srv740402944=329, srv555807163=294, srv566277037=296, srv734882045=327, srv1143683685=27, srv1021400966=5, srv694407347=319, srv1626790310=113, srv303328507=244, srv1869166689=171, srv781623755=341, srv40741117=264, srv1958265988=190, srv592380483=303, srv483565354=277, srv1531731329=100, srv359746409=253, srv1271131029=54, srv1007512250=2, srv1783696565=158, srv1284150263=57, srv1648846971=118, srv120365207=40, srv263085176=235, srv535080964=290, srv824739010=357, srv744793832=331, srv1073394883=18, srv1113186104=23, srv1370321362=69, srv328204461=249, srv1604342762=109, srv266460489=237, srv313806624=245, srv1473408823=93, srv865692144=366, srv42814401=265, srv104065318=10, srv1599236554=108, srv1476834435=94, srv1673452142=128, srv716892727=325, srv1501773847=98, srv791504502=346, srv367902453=254, srv254349567=232, srv2126102976=218, srv252714068=231, srv916506189=380, srv687320190=318, srv1000433998=0, srv51396503=281, srv648464134=313, srv908419423=379, srv204022732=200, srv1901650254=177, srv200342397=196, srv765841762=335, srv1849125656=167, srv235281774=226, srv2137298641=224, srv517347076=283, srv1687711069=135, srv800105834=347, srv1609917009=112, srv1038797815=9, srv863216619=365, srv921796978=382, srv895924009=376, srv319002955=246, srv611122413=305, srv1942590787=186, srv529333113=288, srv1053973741=14, srv1988512138=194, srv1037112526=8, srv442327402=268, srv2062351281=204, srv1240518778=48, srv471289019=274, srv1857090224=170, srv1543025253=101, srv1915241294=184, srv238420451=228, srv1747796150=145, srv1101668258=21, srv1437034663=88, srv1173449481=35, srv582652595=301, srv1739043021=144, srv1733173130=143, srv465824154=272, srv14463216=91, srv1720161153=140, srv1549403995=102, srv235920151=227, srv1909060246=179, srv527988350=287, srv1801762669=161, srv89501442=375, srv442994824=269, srv1414012241=83, srv165153258=121, srv1766333515=151, srv2063438865=205, srv1071671801=17, srv1638570398=116, srv1035353226=7, srv1856921753=169, srv1887444158=173, srv1897306674=176, srv1255718022=51, srv1260078897=53, srv1372945218=70, srv1163715139=31, srv175471358=146, srv1558656747=104, srv1463869996=92, srv124825865=49, srv1142495625=26, srv1397803774=77, srv1644508836=117, srv1807320536=162, srv1165273546=32, srv1650978005=120, srv1374260725=71, srv2065239646=206, srv1685737274=134, srv878340336=371, srv329463090=250, srv2112675912=213, srv1378293943=74, srv787532288=343, srv1292867420=59, srv519831391=285, srv1002018470=1, srv822141051=356, srv1229740495=45, srv706370370=321, srv255741565=233, srv1177018836=36, srv1223505925=43, srv745532463=332, srv1820836786=163, srv2127145828=220, srv2124524081=216, srv665150476=316, srv2132621880=223, srv2051928856=203, srv1903063797=178, srv881186303=373, srv1758974023=148, srv270549378=239, srv2014789268=198, srv1663469360=123, srv1331983035=65, srv1768940632=153, srv2084732799=210, srv1043044287=12, srv630246195=309, srv86319792=364, srv37305654=256, srv1650394019=119, srv1888093001=174, srv512441512=280, srv813969264=352, srv277288989=241, srv2017714321=199, srv1410469782=81, srv751917673=333, srv1443060804=89, srv1997063872=195, srv404426071=263, srv1443287861=90, srv695697141=320, srv636958174=310, srv1105584096=22, srv583005569=302, srv92523166=384, srv330226906=251, srv1684865692=133, srv381463497=258, srv567942525=297, srv1010403208=3, srv881516937=374, srv140693587=80, srv1872213858=172, srv262210172=234, srv846799674=358, srv851169364=360, srv880017865=372, srv129190288=58, srv401606217=262, srv669535820=317, srv1325384866=64, srv1377673856=73, srv1416276025=85, srv430431276=266, srv81513922=353, srv2044458062=201, srv2118166427=214, srv1665530216=125, srv2045587532=202, srv1824773168=164, srv2071913725=208, srv1295499145=60, srv1780304939=155, srv612277490=306, srv102508625=6, srv1637539828=115, srv820424989=355, srv50966795=279, srv1950402166=188, srv1207208580=42, srv1057648579=16, srv1084295726=20, srv39165764=260, srv959379519=387, srv2066402828=207, srv1556810592=103, srv1232731779=46, srv1606144164=110, srv1487275322=95, srv519310224=284, srv775221203=338, srv1079168923=19, srv1957834842=189, srv866525142=367, srv243907419=229, srv248553307=230, srv344122075=252, srv467461515=273, srv805609280=349, srv1018507425=4, srv1827511993=166, srv1704639485=137, srv855754935=362, srv1057024901=15, srv1116429721=24, srv927375731=385, srv1383836323=76, srv1584407048=107, srv809779157=351, srv1786622589=159, srv869541705=368, srv1123072042=25, srv1726136626=142, srv135800579=67, srv1958676591=191, srv390748718=259, srv907223095=378, srv76871917=336, srv1160170031=29, srv2119727728=215, srv918100507=381, srv1352063642=66, srv1975716907=193} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:15,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:15,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:15,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:15,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:15,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:15,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:15,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:15,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:15,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:15,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:15,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-17 21:53:15,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-17 21:53:15,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-17 21:53:15,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-17 21:53:15,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-17 21:53:15,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-17 21:53:15,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-17 21:53:15,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-17 21:53:15,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-17 21:53:15,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-17 21:53:15,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-17 21:53:15,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-17 21:53:15,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-17 21:53:15,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-17 21:53:15,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-17 21:53:15,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-17 21:53:15,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-17 21:53:15,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-17 21:53:15,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-17 21:53:15,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-17 21:53:15,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-17 21:53:15,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-17 21:53:15,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-17 21:53:15,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-17 21:53:15,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-17 21:53:15,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-17 21:53:15,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-17 21:53:15,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-17 21:53:15,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-17 21:53:15,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-17 21:53:15,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-17 21:53:15,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-17 21:53:15,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-17 21:53:15,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-17 21:53:15,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-17 21:53:15,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-17 21:53:15,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-17 21:53:15,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-17 21:53:15,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-17 21:53:15,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-17 21:53:15,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-17 21:53:15,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-17 21:53:15,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-17 21:53:15,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-17 21:53:15,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-17 21:53:15,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-17 21:53:15,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-17 21:53:15,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-17 21:53:15,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-17 21:53:15,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-17 21:53:15,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-17 21:53:15,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-17 21:53:15,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-17 21:53:15,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-17 21:53:15,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-17 21:53:15,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-17 21:53:15,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-17 21:53:15,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-17 21:53:15,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-17 21:53:15,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-17 21:53:15,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-17 21:53:15,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-17 21:53:15,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-17 21:53:15,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-17 21:53:15,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-17 21:53:15,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-17 21:53:15,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-17 21:53:15,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-17 21:53:15,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-17 21:53:15,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-17 21:53:15,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-17 21:53:15,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-17 21:53:15,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-17 21:53:15,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-17 21:53:15,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-17 21:53:15,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-17 21:53:15,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-17 21:53:15,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-17 21:53:15,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-17 21:53:15,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-17 21:53:15,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-17 21:53:15,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-17 21:53:15,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-17 21:53:15,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-17 21:53:15,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-17 21:53:15,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-17 21:53:15,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-17 21:53:15,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-17 21:53:15,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-17 21:53:15,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-17 21:53:15,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-17 21:53:15,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-17 21:53:15,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-17 21:53:15,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-17 21:53:15,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-17 21:53:15,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-17 21:53:15,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-17 21:53:15,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-17 21:53:15,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-17 21:53:15,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-17 21:53:15,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-17 21:53:15,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-17 21:53:15,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-17 21:53:15,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-17 21:53:15,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-17 21:53:15,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-17 21:53:15,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-17 21:53:15,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-17 21:53:15,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-17 21:53:15,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-17 21:53:15,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-17 21:53:15,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-17 21:53:15,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-17 21:53:15,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-17 21:53:15,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-17 21:53:15,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-17 21:53:15,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-17 21:53:15,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-17 21:53:15,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-17 21:53:15,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-17 21:53:15,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-17 21:53:15,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-17 21:53:15,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-17 21:53:15,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-17 21:53:15,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-17 21:53:15,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-17 21:53:15,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-17 21:53:15,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-17 21:53:15,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-17 21:53:15,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-17 21:53:15,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-17 21:53:15,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-17 21:53:15,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-17 21:53:15,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-17 21:53:15,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-17 21:53:15,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-17 21:53:15,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-17 21:53:15,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-17 21:53:15,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-17 21:53:15,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-17 21:53:15,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-17 21:53:15,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-17 21:53:15,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-17 21:53:15,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-17 21:53:15,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-17 21:53:15,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-17 21:53:15,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-17 21:53:15,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-17 21:53:15,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-17 21:53:15,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-17 21:53:15,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-17 21:53:15,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-17 21:53:15,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-17 21:53:15,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-17 21:53:15,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-17 21:53:15,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-17 21:53:15,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-17 21:53:15,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-17 21:53:15,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-17 21:53:15,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-17 21:53:15,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-17 21:53:15,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-17 21:53:15,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-17 21:53:15,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-17 21:53:15,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-17 21:53:15,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-17 21:53:15,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-17 21:53:15,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-17 21:53:15,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-17 21:53:15,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-17 21:53:15,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-17 21:53:15,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-17 21:53:15,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-17 21:53:15,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-17 21:53:15,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-17 21:53:15,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-17 21:53:15,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-17 21:53:15,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-17 21:53:15,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-17 21:53:15,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-17 21:53:15,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-17 21:53:15,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-17 21:53:15,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-17 21:53:15,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-17 21:53:15,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-17 21:53:15,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-17 21:53:15,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-17 21:53:15,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-17 21:53:15,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-17 21:53:15,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-17 21:53:15,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-17 21:53:15,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-17 21:53:15,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-17 21:53:15,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-17 21:53:15,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-17 21:53:15,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-17 21:53:15,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-17 21:53:15,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-17 21:53:15,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-17 21:53:15,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-17 21:53:15,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-17 21:53:15,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-17 21:53:15,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-17 21:53:15,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-17 21:53:15,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-17 21:53:15,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-17 21:53:15,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-17 21:53:15,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-17 21:53:15,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-17 21:53:15,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-17 21:53:15,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-17 21:53:15,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-17 21:53:15,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-17 21:53:15,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-17 21:53:15,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-17 21:53:15,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-17 21:53:15,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-17 21:53:15,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-17 21:53:15,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-17 21:53:15,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-17 21:53:15,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-17 21:53:15,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-17 21:53:15,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-17 21:53:15,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-17 21:53:15,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-17 21:53:15,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-17 21:53:15,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-17 21:53:15,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-17 21:53:15,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-17 21:53:15,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-17 21:53:15,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-17 21:53:15,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-17 21:53:15,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-17 21:53:15,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-17 21:53:15,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-17 21:53:15,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-17 21:53:15,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-17 21:53:15,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-17 21:53:15,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-17 21:53:15,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-17 21:53:15,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-17 21:53:15,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-17 21:53:15,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-17 21:53:15,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-17 21:53:15,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-17 21:53:15,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-17 21:53:15,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-17 21:53:15,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-17 21:53:15,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-17 21:53:15,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-17 21:53:15,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-17 21:53:15,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-17 21:53:15,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-17 21:53:15,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-17 21:53:15,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-17 21:53:15,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-17 21:53:15,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-17 21:53:15,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-17 21:53:15,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-17 21:53:15,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-17 21:53:15,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-17 21:53:15,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-17 21:53:15,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-17 21:53:15,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-17 21:53:15,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-17 21:53:15,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-17 21:53:15,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-17 21:53:15,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-17 21:53:15,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-17 21:53:15,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-17 21:53:15,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-17 21:53:15,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-17 21:53:15,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-17 21:53:15,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-17 21:53:15,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-17 21:53:15,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-17 21:53:15,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-17 21:53:15,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-17 21:53:15,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-17 21:53:15,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-17 21:53:15,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-17 21:53:15,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-17 21:53:15,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-17 21:53:15,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-17 21:53:15,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-17 21:53:15,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-17 21:53:15,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-17 21:53:15,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-17 21:53:15,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-17 21:53:15,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-17 21:53:15,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-17 21:53:15,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-17 21:53:15,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-17 21:53:15,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-17 21:53:15,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-17 21:53:15,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-17 21:53:15,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-17 21:53:15,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-17 21:53:15,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-17 21:53:15,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-17 21:53:15,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-17 21:53:15,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-17 21:53:15,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-17 21:53:15,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-17 21:53:15,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-17 21:53:15,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-17 21:53:15,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-17 21:53:15,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-17 21:53:15,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-17 21:53:15,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-17 21:53:15,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-17 21:53:15,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-17 21:53:15,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-17 21:53:15,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-17 21:53:15,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-17 21:53:15,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-17 21:53:15,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-17 21:53:15,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-17 21:53:15,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-17 21:53:15,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-17 21:53:15,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-17 21:53:15,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-17 21:53:15,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-17 21:53:15,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-17 21:53:15,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-17 21:53:15,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-17 21:53:15,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-17 21:53:15,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-17 21:53:15,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-17 21:53:15,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-17 21:53:15,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-17 21:53:15,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-17 21:53:15,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-17 21:53:15,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-17 21:53:15,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-17 21:53:15,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-17 21:53:15,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-17 21:53:15,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-17 21:53:15,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-17 21:53:15,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-17 21:53:15,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-17 21:53:15,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-17 21:53:15,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-17 21:53:15,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-17 21:53:15,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-17 21:53:15,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-17 21:53:15,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-17 21:53:15,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-17 21:53:15,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-17 21:53:15,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-17 21:53:15,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-17 21:53:15,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-17 21:53:15,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-17 21:53:15,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-17 21:53:15,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-17 21:53:15,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-17 21:53:15,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-17 21:53:15,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-17 21:53:15,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-17 21:53:15,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-17 21:53:15,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-17 21:53:15,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-17 21:53:15,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-17 21:53:15,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-17 21:53:15,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-17 21:53:15,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-17 21:53:15,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-17 21:53:15,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-17 21:53:15,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-17 21:53:15,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-17 21:53:15,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-17 21:53:15,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-17 21:53:15,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-17 21:53:15,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-17 21:53:15,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-17 21:53:15,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-17 21:53:15,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-17 21:53:15,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-17 21:53:15,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-17 21:53:15,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-17 21:53:15,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-17 21:53:15,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-17 21:53:15,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-17 21:53:15,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:15,189 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table31) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:15,189 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table8
2023-07-17 21:53:15,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv871358531=369, srv64697211=312, srv653261481=314, srv1778141916=154, srv716510755=323, srv372169288=255, srv568235512=298, srv710229516=322, srv537137712=293, srv1682791519=131, srv642353994=311, srv1046656068=13, srv993792848=391, srv1202667070=39, srv99567927=392, srv1607947050=111, srv1677371877=129, srv1763526149=150, srv1763378353=149, srv531263272=289, srv448398842=270, srv802808934=348, srv77960001=340, srv453521623=271, srv162773041=114, srv563606057=295, srv1659238910=122, srv1279307656=55, srv1914255334=183, srv1296605582=61, srv2131597846=222, srv1375359355=72, srv1405269336=79, srv175680261=147, srv282211488=242, srv1412891098=82, srv375712549=257, srv191234370=182, srv1574132168=106, srv1853511149=168, srv617306884=307, srv268601623=238, srv1400099806=78, srv477381292=275, srv1279442050=56, srv535853198=292, srv1767480590=152, srv2100700333=211, srv1187847151=37, srv791064637=345, srv74478935=330, srv1206084762=41, srv1497856295=97, srv897884865=377, srv398014971=261, srv786136704=342, srv1429879791=86, srv1201763981=38, srv1415213844=84, srv302220908=243, srv156683359=105, srv1974497084=192, srv535358845=291, srv627763604=308, srv732106437=326, srv1679724304=130, srv576770232=299, srv478480013=276, srv1237250370=47, srv1169018295=34, srv32320833=248, srv594880186=304, srv216306370=225, srv656484240=315, srv818754908=354, srv1321058011=63, srv1256345927=52, srv1670847243=126, srv1515243164=99, srv1781378955=156, srv508388209=278, srv1910886192=180, srv1718898730=139, srv772274482=337, srv1433624807=87, srv848605385=359, srv2107957639=212, srv270591905=240, srv2126706298=219, srv2080681743=209, srv1683990934=132, srv11526364=28, srv761020484=334, srv1720507603=141, srv266276730=236, srv935213051=386, srv923440665=383, srv1911104834=181, srv1944131651=187, srv1162841146=30, srv1921230216=185, srv319459319=247, srv1168022226=33, srv57689659=300, srv716533901=324, srv1255156178=50, srv441379967=267, srv806979625=350, srv788255577=344, srv976533744=389, srv1317853355=62, srv1491073587=96, srv777865249=339, srv2130226580=221, srv873230355=370, srv971370780=388, srv2008207413=197, srv989150800=390, srv737980208=328, srv862088563=363, srv1716783669=138, srv1801293056=160, srv1363984373=68, srv515711115=282, srv1378945327=75, srv17002515=136, srv853498273=361, srv1825292480=165, srv2124576425=217, srv1889349340=175, srv527691188=286, srv1226737728=44, srv1781498156=157, srv104267960=11, srv1663644309=124, srv1672213768=127, srv740402944=329, srv555807163=294, srv566277037=296, srv734882045=327, srv1143683685=27, srv1021400966=5, srv694407347=319, srv1626790310=113, srv303328507=244, srv1869166689=171, srv781623755=341, srv40741117=264, srv1958265988=190, srv592380483=303, srv483565354=277, srv1531731329=100, srv359746409=253, srv1271131029=54, srv1007512250=2, srv1783696565=158, srv1284150263=57, srv1648846971=118, srv120365207=40, srv263085176=235, srv535080964=290, srv824739010=357, srv744793832=331, srv1073394883=18, srv1113186104=23, srv1370321362=69, srv328204461=249, srv1604342762=109, srv266460489=237, srv313806624=245, srv1473408823=93, srv865692144=366, srv42814401=265, srv104065318=10, srv1599236554=108, srv1476834435=94, srv1673452142=128, srv716892727=325, srv1501773847=98, srv791504502=346, srv367902453=254, srv254349567=232, srv2126102976=218, srv252714068=231, srv916506189=380, srv687320190=318, srv1000433998=0, srv51396503=281, srv648464134=313, srv908419423=379, srv204022732=200, srv1901650254=177, srv200342397=196, srv765841762=335, srv1849125656=167, srv235281774=226, srv2137298641=224, srv517347076=283, srv1687711069=135, srv800105834=347, srv1609917009=112, srv1038797815=9, srv863216619=365, srv921796978=382, srv895924009=376, srv319002955=246, srv611122413=305, srv1942590787=186, srv529333113=288, srv1053973741=14, srv1988512138=194, srv1037112526=8, srv442327402=268, srv2062351281=204, srv1240518778=48, srv471289019=274, srv1857090224=170, srv1543025253=101, srv1915241294=184, srv238420451=228, srv1747796150=145, srv1101668258=21, srv1437034663=88, srv1173449481=35, srv582652595=301, srv1739043021=144, srv1733173130=143, srv465824154=272, srv14463216=91, srv1720161153=140, srv1549403995=102, srv235920151=227, srv1909060246=179, srv527988350=287, srv1801762669=161, srv89501442=375, srv442994824=269, srv1414012241=83, srv165153258=121, srv1766333515=151, srv2063438865=205, srv1071671801=17, srv1638570398=116, srv1035353226=7, srv1856921753=169, srv1887444158=173, srv1897306674=176, srv1255718022=51, srv1260078897=53, srv1372945218=70, srv1163715139=31, srv175471358=146, srv1558656747=104, srv1463869996=92, srv124825865=49, srv1142495625=26, srv1397803774=77, srv1644508836=117, srv1807320536=162, srv1165273546=32, srv1650978005=120, srv1374260725=71, srv2065239646=206, srv1685737274=134, srv878340336=371, srv329463090=250, srv2112675912=213, srv1378293943=74, srv787532288=343, srv1292867420=59, srv519831391=285, srv1002018470=1, srv822141051=356, srv1229740495=45, srv706370370=321, srv255741565=233, srv1177018836=36, srv1223505925=43, srv745532463=332, srv1820836786=163, srv2127145828=220, srv2124524081=216, srv665150476=316, srv2132621880=223, srv2051928856=203, srv1903063797=178, srv881186303=373, srv1758974023=148, srv270549378=239, srv2014789268=198, srv1663469360=123, srv1331983035=65, srv1768940632=153, srv2084732799=210, srv1043044287=12, srv630246195=309, srv86319792=364, srv37305654=256, srv1650394019=119, srv1888093001=174, srv512441512=280, srv813969264=352, srv277288989=241, srv2017714321=199, srv1410469782=81, srv751917673=333, srv1443060804=89, srv1997063872=195, srv404426071=263, srv1443287861=90, srv695697141=320, srv636958174=310, srv1105584096=22, srv583005569=302, srv92523166=384, srv330226906=251, srv1684865692=133, srv381463497=258, srv567942525=297, srv1010403208=3, srv881516937=374, srv140693587=80, srv1872213858=172, srv262210172=234, srv846799674=358, srv851169364=360, srv880017865=372, srv129190288=58, srv401606217=262, srv669535820=317, srv1325384866=64, srv1377673856=73, srv1416276025=85, srv430431276=266, srv81513922=353, srv2044458062=201, srv2118166427=214, srv1665530216=125, srv2045587532=202, srv1824773168=164, srv2071913725=208, srv1295499145=60, srv1780304939=155, srv612277490=306, srv102508625=6, srv1637539828=115, srv820424989=355, srv50966795=279, srv1950402166=188, srv1207208580=42, srv1057648579=16, srv1084295726=20, srv39165764=260, srv959379519=387, srv2066402828=207, srv1556810592=103, srv1232731779=46, srv1606144164=110, srv1487275322=95, srv519310224=284, srv775221203=338, srv1079168923=19, srv1957834842=189, srv866525142=367, srv243907419=229, srv248553307=230, srv344122075=252, srv467461515=273, srv805609280=349, srv1018507425=4, srv1827511993=166, srv1704639485=137, srv855754935=362, srv1057024901=15, srv1116429721=24, srv927375731=385, srv1383836323=76, srv1584407048=107, srv809779157=351, srv1786622589=159, srv869541705=368, srv1123072042=25, srv1726136626=142, srv135800579=67, srv1958676591=191, srv390748718=259, srv907223095=378, srv76871917=336, srv1160170031=29, srv2119727728=215, srv918100507=381, srv1352063642=66, srv1975716907=193} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:15,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:15,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:15,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:15,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:15,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:15,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:15,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:15,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:15,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:15,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:15,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-17 21:53:15,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-17 21:53:15,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-17 21:53:15,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-17 21:53:15,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-17 21:53:15,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-17 21:53:15,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-17 21:53:15,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-17 21:53:15,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-17 21:53:15,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-17 21:53:15,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-17 21:53:15,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-17 21:53:15,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-17 21:53:15,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-17 21:53:15,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-17 21:53:15,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-17 21:53:15,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-17 21:53:15,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-17 21:53:15,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-17 21:53:15,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-17 21:53:15,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-17 21:53:15,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-17 21:53:15,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-17 21:53:15,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-17 21:53:15,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-17 21:53:15,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-17 21:53:15,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-17 21:53:15,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-17 21:53:15,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-17 21:53:15,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-17 21:53:15,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-17 21:53:15,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-17 21:53:15,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-17 21:53:15,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-17 21:53:15,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-17 21:53:15,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-17 21:53:15,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-17 21:53:15,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-17 21:53:15,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-17 21:53:15,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-17 21:53:15,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-17 21:53:15,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-17 21:53:15,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-17 21:53:15,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-17 21:53:15,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-17 21:53:15,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-17 21:53:15,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-17 21:53:15,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-17 21:53:15,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-17 21:53:15,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-17 21:53:15,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-17 21:53:15,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-17 21:53:15,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-17 21:53:15,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-17 21:53:15,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-17 21:53:15,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-17 21:53:15,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-17 21:53:15,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-17 21:53:15,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-17 21:53:15,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-17 21:53:15,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-17 21:53:15,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-17 21:53:15,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-17 21:53:15,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-17 21:53:15,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-17 21:53:15,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-17 21:53:15,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-17 21:53:15,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-17 21:53:15,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-17 21:53:15,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-17 21:53:15,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-17 21:53:15,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-17 21:53:15,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-17 21:53:15,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-17 21:53:15,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-17 21:53:15,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-17 21:53:15,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-17 21:53:15,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-17 21:53:15,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-17 21:53:15,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-17 21:53:15,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-17 21:53:15,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-17 21:53:15,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-17 21:53:15,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-17 21:53:15,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-17 21:53:15,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-17 21:53:15,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-17 21:53:15,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-17 21:53:15,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-17 21:53:15,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-17 21:53:15,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-17 21:53:15,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-17 21:53:15,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-17 21:53:15,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-17 21:53:15,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-17 21:53:15,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-17 21:53:15,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-17 21:53:15,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-17 21:53:15,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-17 21:53:15,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-17 21:53:15,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-17 21:53:15,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-17 21:53:15,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-17 21:53:15,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-17 21:53:15,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-17 21:53:15,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-17 21:53:15,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-17 21:53:15,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-17 21:53:15,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-17 21:53:15,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-17 21:53:15,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-17 21:53:15,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-17 21:53:15,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-17 21:53:15,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-17 21:53:15,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-17 21:53:15,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-17 21:53:15,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-17 21:53:15,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-17 21:53:15,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-17 21:53:15,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-17 21:53:15,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-17 21:53:15,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-17 21:53:15,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-17 21:53:15,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-17 21:53:15,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-17 21:53:15,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-17 21:53:15,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-17 21:53:15,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-17 21:53:15,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-17 21:53:15,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-17 21:53:15,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-17 21:53:15,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-17 21:53:15,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-17 21:53:15,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-17 21:53:15,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-17 21:53:15,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-17 21:53:15,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-17 21:53:15,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-17 21:53:15,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-17 21:53:15,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-17 21:53:15,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-17 21:53:15,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-17 21:53:15,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-17 21:53:15,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-17 21:53:15,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-17 21:53:15,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-17 21:53:15,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-17 21:53:15,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-17 21:53:15,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-17 21:53:15,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-17 21:53:15,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-17 21:53:15,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-17 21:53:15,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-17 21:53:15,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-17 21:53:15,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-17 21:53:15,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-17 21:53:15,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-17 21:53:15,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-17 21:53:15,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-17 21:53:15,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-17 21:53:15,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-17 21:53:15,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-17 21:53:15,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-17 21:53:15,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-17 21:53:15,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-17 21:53:15,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-17 21:53:15,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-17 21:53:15,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-17 21:53:15,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-17 21:53:15,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-17 21:53:15,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-17 21:53:15,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-17 21:53:15,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-17 21:53:15,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-17 21:53:15,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-17 21:53:15,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-17 21:53:15,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-17 21:53:15,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-17 21:53:15,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-17 21:53:15,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-17 21:53:15,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-17 21:53:15,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-17 21:53:15,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-17 21:53:15,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-17 21:53:15,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-17 21:53:15,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-17 21:53:15,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-17 21:53:15,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-17 21:53:15,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-17 21:53:15,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-17 21:53:15,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-17 21:53:15,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-17 21:53:15,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-17 21:53:15,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-17 21:53:15,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-17 21:53:15,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-17 21:53:15,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-17 21:53:15,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-17 21:53:15,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-17 21:53:15,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-17 21:53:15,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-17 21:53:15,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-17 21:53:15,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-17 21:53:15,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-17 21:53:15,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-17 21:53:15,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-17 21:53:15,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-17 21:53:15,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-17 21:53:15,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-17 21:53:15,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-17 21:53:15,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-17 21:53:15,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-17 21:53:15,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-17 21:53:15,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-17 21:53:15,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-17 21:53:15,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-17 21:53:15,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-17 21:53:15,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-17 21:53:15,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-17 21:53:15,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-17 21:53:15,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-17 21:53:15,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-17 21:53:15,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-17 21:53:15,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-17 21:53:15,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-17 21:53:15,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-17 21:53:15,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-17 21:53:15,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-17 21:53:15,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-17 21:53:15,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-17 21:53:15,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-17 21:53:15,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-17 21:53:15,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-17 21:53:15,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-17 21:53:15,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-17 21:53:15,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-17 21:53:15,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-17 21:53:15,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-17 21:53:15,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-17 21:53:15,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-17 21:53:15,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-17 21:53:15,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-17 21:53:15,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-17 21:53:15,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-17 21:53:15,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-17 21:53:15,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-17 21:53:15,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-17 21:53:15,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-17 21:53:15,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-17 21:53:15,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-17 21:53:15,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-17 21:53:15,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-17 21:53:15,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-17 21:53:15,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-17 21:53:15,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-17 21:53:15,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-17 21:53:15,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-17 21:53:15,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-17 21:53:15,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-17 21:53:15,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-17 21:53:15,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-17 21:53:15,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-17 21:53:15,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-17 21:53:15,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-17 21:53:15,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-17 21:53:15,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-17 21:53:15,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-17 21:53:15,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-17 21:53:15,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-17 21:53:15,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-17 21:53:15,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-17 21:53:15,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-17 21:53:15,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-17 21:53:15,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-17 21:53:15,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-17 21:53:15,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-17 21:53:15,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-17 21:53:15,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-17 21:53:15,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-17 21:53:15,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-17 21:53:15,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-17 21:53:15,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-17 21:53:15,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-17 21:53:15,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-17 21:53:15,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-17 21:53:15,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-17 21:53:15,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-17 21:53:15,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-17 21:53:15,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-17 21:53:15,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-17 21:53:15,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-17 21:53:15,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-17 21:53:15,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-17 21:53:15,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-17 21:53:15,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-17 21:53:15,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-17 21:53:15,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-17 21:53:15,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-17 21:53:15,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-17 21:53:15,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-17 21:53:15,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-17 21:53:15,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-17 21:53:15,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-17 21:53:15,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-17 21:53:15,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-17 21:53:15,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-17 21:53:15,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-17 21:53:15,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-17 21:53:15,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-17 21:53:15,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-17 21:53:15,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-17 21:53:15,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-17 21:53:15,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-17 21:53:15,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-17 21:53:15,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-17 21:53:15,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-17 21:53:15,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-17 21:53:15,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-17 21:53:15,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-17 21:53:15,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-17 21:53:15,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-17 21:53:15,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-17 21:53:15,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-17 21:53:15,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-17 21:53:15,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-17 21:53:15,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-17 21:53:15,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-17 21:53:15,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-17 21:53:15,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-17 21:53:15,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-17 21:53:15,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-17 21:53:15,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-17 21:53:15,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-17 21:53:15,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-17 21:53:15,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-17 21:53:15,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-17 21:53:15,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-17 21:53:15,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-17 21:53:15,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-17 21:53:15,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-17 21:53:15,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-17 21:53:15,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-17 21:53:15,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-17 21:53:15,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-17 21:53:15,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-17 21:53:15,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-17 21:53:15,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-17 21:53:15,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-17 21:53:15,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-17 21:53:15,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-17 21:53:15,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-17 21:53:15,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-17 21:53:15,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-17 21:53:15,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-17 21:53:15,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-17 21:53:15,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-17 21:53:15,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-17 21:53:15,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-17 21:53:15,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-17 21:53:15,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-17 21:53:15,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-17 21:53:15,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-17 21:53:15,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-17 21:53:15,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-17 21:53:15,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-17 21:53:15,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-17 21:53:15,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-17 21:53:15,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-17 21:53:15,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-17 21:53:15,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-17 21:53:15,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-17 21:53:15,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-17 21:53:15,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-17 21:53:15,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-17 21:53:15,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-17 21:53:15,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-17 21:53:15,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-17 21:53:15,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-17 21:53:15,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-17 21:53:15,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-17 21:53:15,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-17 21:53:15,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-17 21:53:15,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-17 21:53:15,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:15,204 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table8) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:15,204 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table32
2023-07-17 21:53:15,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv871358531=369, srv64697211=312, srv653261481=314, srv1778141916=154, srv716510755=323, srv372169288=255, srv568235512=298, srv710229516=322, srv537137712=293, srv1682791519=131, srv642353994=311, srv1046656068=13, srv993792848=391, srv1202667070=39, srv99567927=392, srv1607947050=111, srv1677371877=129, srv1763526149=150, srv1763378353=149, srv531263272=289, srv448398842=270, srv802808934=348, srv77960001=340, srv453521623=271, srv162773041=114, srv563606057=295, srv1659238910=122, srv1279307656=55, srv1914255334=183, srv1296605582=61, srv2131597846=222, srv1375359355=72, srv1405269336=79, srv175680261=147, srv282211488=242, srv1412891098=82, srv375712549=257, srv191234370=182, srv1574132168=106, srv1853511149=168, srv617306884=307, srv268601623=238, srv1400099806=78, srv477381292=275, srv1279442050=56, srv535853198=292, srv1767480590=152, srv2100700333=211, srv1187847151=37, srv791064637=345, srv74478935=330, srv1206084762=41, srv1497856295=97, srv897884865=377, srv398014971=261, srv786136704=342, srv1429879791=86, srv1201763981=38, srv1415213844=84, srv302220908=243, srv156683359=105, srv1974497084=192, srv535358845=291, srv627763604=308, srv732106437=326, srv1679724304=130, srv576770232=299, srv478480013=276, srv1237250370=47, srv1169018295=34, srv32320833=248, srv594880186=304, srv216306370=225, srv656484240=315, srv818754908=354, srv1321058011=63, srv1256345927=52, srv1670847243=126, srv1515243164=99, srv1781378955=156, srv508388209=278, srv1910886192=180, srv1718898730=139, srv772274482=337, srv1433624807=87, srv848605385=359, srv2107957639=212, srv270591905=240, srv2126706298=219, srv2080681743=209, srv1683990934=132, srv11526364=28, srv761020484=334, srv1720507603=141, srv266276730=236, srv935213051=386, srv923440665=383, srv1911104834=181, srv1944131651=187, srv1162841146=30, srv1921230216=185, srv319459319=247, srv1168022226=33, srv57689659=300, srv716533901=324, srv1255156178=50, srv441379967=267, srv806979625=350, srv788255577=344, srv976533744=389, srv1317853355=62, srv1491073587=96, srv777865249=339, srv2130226580=221, srv873230355=370, srv971370780=388, srv2008207413=197, srv989150800=390, srv737980208=328, srv862088563=363, srv1716783669=138, srv1801293056=160, srv1363984373=68, srv515711115=282, srv1378945327=75, srv17002515=136, srv853498273=361, srv1825292480=165, srv2124576425=217, srv1889349340=175, srv527691188=286, srv1226737728=44, srv1781498156=157, srv104267960=11, srv1663644309=124, srv1672213768=127, srv740402944=329, srv555807163=294, srv566277037=296, srv734882045=327, srv1143683685=27, srv1021400966=5, srv694407347=319, srv1626790310=113, srv303328507=244, srv1869166689=171, srv781623755=341, srv40741117=264, srv1958265988=190, srv592380483=303, srv483565354=277, srv1531731329=100, srv359746409=253, srv1271131029=54, srv1007512250=2, srv1783696565=158, srv1284150263=57, srv1648846971=118, srv120365207=40, srv263085176=235, srv535080964=290, srv824739010=357, srv744793832=331, srv1073394883=18, srv1113186104=23, srv1370321362=69, srv328204461=249, srv1604342762=109, srv266460489=237, srv313806624=245, srv1473408823=93, srv865692144=366, srv42814401=265, srv104065318=10, srv1599236554=108, srv1476834435=94, srv1673452142=128, srv716892727=325, srv1501773847=98, srv791504502=346, srv367902453=254, srv254349567=232, srv2126102976=218, srv252714068=231, srv916506189=380, srv687320190=318, srv1000433998=0, srv51396503=281, srv648464134=313, srv908419423=379, srv204022732=200, srv1901650254=177, srv200342397=196, srv765841762=335, srv1849125656=167, srv235281774=226, srv2137298641=224, srv517347076=283, srv1687711069=135, srv800105834=347, srv1609917009=112, srv1038797815=9, srv863216619=365, srv921796978=382, srv895924009=376, srv319002955=246, srv611122413=305, srv1942590787=186, srv529333113=288, srv1053973741=14, srv1988512138=194, srv1037112526=8, srv442327402=268, srv2062351281=204, srv1240518778=48, srv471289019=274, srv1857090224=170, srv1543025253=101, srv1915241294=184, srv238420451=228, srv1747796150=145, srv1101668258=21, srv1437034663=88, srv1173449481=35, srv582652595=301, srv1739043021=144, srv1733173130=143, srv465824154=272, srv14463216=91, srv1720161153=140, srv1549403995=102, srv235920151=227, srv1909060246=179, srv527988350=287, srv1801762669=161, srv89501442=375, srv442994824=269, srv1414012241=83, srv165153258=121, srv1766333515=151, srv2063438865=205, srv1071671801=17, srv1638570398=116, srv1035353226=7, srv1856921753=169, srv1887444158=173, srv1897306674=176, srv1255718022=51, srv1260078897=53, srv1372945218=70, srv1163715139=31, srv175471358=146, srv1558656747=104, srv1463869996=92, srv124825865=49, srv1142495625=26, srv1397803774=77, srv1644508836=117, srv1807320536=162, srv1165273546=32, srv1650978005=120, srv1374260725=71, srv2065239646=206, srv1685737274=134, srv878340336=371, srv329463090=250, srv2112675912=213, srv1378293943=74, srv787532288=343, srv1292867420=59, srv519831391=285, srv1002018470=1, srv822141051=356, srv1229740495=45, srv706370370=321, srv255741565=233, srv1177018836=36, srv1223505925=43, srv745532463=332, srv1820836786=163, srv2127145828=220, srv2124524081=216, srv665150476=316, srv2132621880=223, srv2051928856=203, srv1903063797=178, srv881186303=373, srv1758974023=148, srv270549378=239, srv2014789268=198, srv1663469360=123, srv1331983035=65, srv1768940632=153, srv2084732799=210, srv1043044287=12, srv630246195=309, srv86319792=364, srv37305654=256, srv1650394019=119, srv1888093001=174, srv512441512=280, srv813969264=352, srv277288989=241, srv2017714321=199, srv1410469782=81, srv751917673=333, srv1443060804=89, srv1997063872=195, srv404426071=263, srv1443287861=90, srv695697141=320, srv636958174=310, srv1105584096=22, srv583005569=302, srv92523166=384, srv330226906=251, srv1684865692=133, srv381463497=258, srv567942525=297, srv1010403208=3, srv881516937=374, srv140693587=80, srv1872213858=172, srv262210172=234, srv846799674=358, srv851169364=360, srv880017865=372, srv129190288=58, srv401606217=262, srv669535820=317, srv1325384866=64, srv1377673856=73, srv1416276025=85, srv430431276=266, srv81513922=353, srv2044458062=201, srv2118166427=214, srv1665530216=125, srv2045587532=202, srv1824773168=164, srv2071913725=208, srv1295499145=60, srv1780304939=155, srv612277490=306, srv102508625=6, srv1637539828=115, srv820424989=355, srv50966795=279, srv1950402166=188, srv1207208580=42, srv1057648579=16, srv1084295726=20, srv39165764=260, srv959379519=387, srv2066402828=207, srv1556810592=103, srv1232731779=46, srv1606144164=110, srv1487275322=95, srv519310224=284, srv775221203=338, srv1079168923=19, srv1957834842=189, srv866525142=367, srv243907419=229, srv248553307=230, srv344122075=252, srv467461515=273, srv805609280=349, srv1018507425=4, srv1827511993=166, srv1704639485=137, srv855754935=362, srv1057024901=15, srv1116429721=24, srv927375731=385, srv1383836323=76, srv1584407048=107, srv809779157=351, srv1786622589=159, srv869541705=368, srv1123072042=25, srv1726136626=142, srv135800579=67, srv1958676591=191, srv390748718=259, srv907223095=378, srv76871917=336, srv1160170031=29, srv2119727728=215, srv918100507=381, srv1352063642=66, srv1975716907=193} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:15,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:15,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:15,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:15,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:15,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:15,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:15,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:15,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:15,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:15,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:15,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-17 21:53:15,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-17 21:53:15,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-17 21:53:15,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-17 21:53:15,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-17 21:53:15,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-17 21:53:15,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-17 21:53:15,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-17 21:53:15,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-17 21:53:15,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-17 21:53:15,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-17 21:53:15,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-17 21:53:15,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-17 21:53:15,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-17 21:53:15,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-17 21:53:15,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-17 21:53:15,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-17 21:53:15,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-17 21:53:15,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-17 21:53:15,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-17 21:53:15,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-17 21:53:15,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-17 21:53:15,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-17 21:53:15,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-17 21:53:15,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-17 21:53:15,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-17 21:53:15,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-17 21:53:15,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-17 21:53:15,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-17 21:53:15,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-17 21:53:15,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-17 21:53:15,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-17 21:53:15,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-17 21:53:15,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-17 21:53:15,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-17 21:53:15,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-17 21:53:15,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-17 21:53:15,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-17 21:53:15,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-17 21:53:15,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-17 21:53:15,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-17 21:53:15,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-17 21:53:15,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-17 21:53:15,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-17 21:53:15,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-17 21:53:15,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-17 21:53:15,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-17 21:53:15,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-17 21:53:15,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-17 21:53:15,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-17 21:53:15,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-17 21:53:15,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-17 21:53:15,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-17 21:53:15,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-17 21:53:15,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-17 21:53:15,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-17 21:53:15,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-17 21:53:15,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-17 21:53:15,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-17 21:53:15,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-17 21:53:15,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-17 21:53:15,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-17 21:53:15,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-17 21:53:15,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-17 21:53:15,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-17 21:53:15,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-17 21:53:15,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-17 21:53:15,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-17 21:53:15,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-17 21:53:15,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-17 21:53:15,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-17 21:53:15,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-17 21:53:15,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-17 21:53:15,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-17 21:53:15,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-17 21:53:15,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-17 21:53:15,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-17 21:53:15,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-17 21:53:15,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-17 21:53:15,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-17 21:53:15,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-17 21:53:15,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-17 21:53:15,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-17 21:53:15,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-17 21:53:15,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-17 21:53:15,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-17 21:53:15,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-17 21:53:15,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-17 21:53:15,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-17 21:53:15,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-17 21:53:15,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-17 21:53:15,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-17 21:53:15,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-17 21:53:15,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-17 21:53:15,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-17 21:53:15,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-17 21:53:15,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-17 21:53:15,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-17 21:53:15,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-17 21:53:15,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-17 21:53:15,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-17 21:53:15,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-17 21:53:15,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-17 21:53:15,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-17 21:53:15,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-17 21:53:15,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-17 21:53:15,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-17 21:53:15,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-17 21:53:15,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-17 21:53:15,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-17 21:53:15,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-17 21:53:15,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-17 21:53:15,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-17 21:53:15,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-17 21:53:15,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-17 21:53:15,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-17 21:53:15,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-17 21:53:15,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-17 21:53:15,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-17 21:53:15,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-17 21:53:15,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-17 21:53:15,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-17 21:53:15,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-17 21:53:15,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-17 21:53:15,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-17 21:53:15,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-17 21:53:15,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-17 21:53:15,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-17 21:53:15,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-17 21:53:15,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-17 21:53:15,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-17 21:53:15,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-17 21:53:15,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-17 21:53:15,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-17 21:53:15,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-17 21:53:15,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-17 21:53:15,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-17 21:53:15,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-17 21:53:15,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-17 21:53:15,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-17 21:53:15,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-17 21:53:15,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-17 21:53:15,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-17 21:53:15,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-17 21:53:15,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-17 21:53:15,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-17 21:53:15,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-17 21:53:15,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-17 21:53:15,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-17 21:53:15,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-17 21:53:15,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-17 21:53:15,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-17 21:53:15,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-17 21:53:15,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-17 21:53:15,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-17 21:53:15,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-17 21:53:15,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-17 21:53:15,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-17 21:53:15,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-17 21:53:15,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-17 21:53:15,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-17 21:53:15,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-17 21:53:15,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-17 21:53:15,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-17 21:53:15,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-17 21:53:15,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-17 21:53:15,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-17 21:53:15,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-17 21:53:15,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-17 21:53:15,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-17 21:53:15,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-17 21:53:15,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-17 21:53:15,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-17 21:53:15,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-17 21:53:15,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-17 21:53:15,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-17 21:53:15,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-17 21:53:15,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-17 21:53:15,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-17 21:53:15,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-17 21:53:15,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-17 21:53:15,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-17 21:53:15,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-17 21:53:15,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-17 21:53:15,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-17 21:53:15,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-17 21:53:15,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-17 21:53:15,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-17 21:53:15,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-17 21:53:15,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-17 21:53:15,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-17 21:53:15,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-17 21:53:15,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-17 21:53:15,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-17 21:53:15,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-17 21:53:15,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-17 21:53:15,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-17 21:53:15,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-17 21:53:15,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-17 21:53:15,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-17 21:53:15,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-17 21:53:15,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-17 21:53:15,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-17 21:53:15,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-17 21:53:15,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-17 21:53:15,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-17 21:53:15,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-17 21:53:15,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-17 21:53:15,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-17 21:53:15,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-17 21:53:15,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-17 21:53:15,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-17 21:53:15,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-17 21:53:15,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-17 21:53:15,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-17 21:53:15,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-17 21:53:15,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-17 21:53:15,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-17 21:53:15,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-17 21:53:15,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-17 21:53:15,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-17 21:53:15,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-17 21:53:15,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-17 21:53:15,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-17 21:53:15,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-17 21:53:15,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-17 21:53:15,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-17 21:53:15,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-17 21:53:15,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-17 21:53:15,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-17 21:53:15,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-17 21:53:15,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-17 21:53:15,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-17 21:53:15,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-17 21:53:15,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-17 21:53:15,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-17 21:53:15,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-17 21:53:15,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-17 21:53:15,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-17 21:53:15,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-17 21:53:15,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-17 21:53:15,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-17 21:53:15,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-17 21:53:15,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-17 21:53:15,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-17 21:53:15,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-17 21:53:15,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-17 21:53:15,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-17 21:53:15,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-17 21:53:15,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-17 21:53:15,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-17 21:53:15,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-17 21:53:15,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-17 21:53:15,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-17 21:53:15,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-17 21:53:15,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-17 21:53:15,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-17 21:53:15,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-17 21:53:15,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-17 21:53:15,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-17 21:53:15,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-17 21:53:15,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-17 21:53:15,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-17 21:53:15,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-17 21:53:15,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-17 21:53:15,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-17 21:53:15,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-17 21:53:15,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-17 21:53:15,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-17 21:53:15,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-17 21:53:15,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-17 21:53:15,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-17 21:53:15,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-17 21:53:15,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-17 21:53:15,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-17 21:53:15,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-17 21:53:15,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-17 21:53:15,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-17 21:53:15,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-17 21:53:15,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-17 21:53:15,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-17 21:53:15,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-17 21:53:15,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-17 21:53:15,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-17 21:53:15,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-17 21:53:15,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-17 21:53:15,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-17 21:53:15,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-17 21:53:15,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-17 21:53:15,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-17 21:53:15,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-17 21:53:15,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-17 21:53:15,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-17 21:53:15,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-17 21:53:15,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-17 21:53:15,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-17 21:53:15,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-17 21:53:15,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-17 21:53:15,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-17 21:53:15,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-17 21:53:15,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-17 21:53:15,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-17 21:53:15,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-17 21:53:15,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-17 21:53:15,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-17 21:53:15,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-17 21:53:15,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-17 21:53:15,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-17 21:53:15,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-17 21:53:15,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-17 21:53:15,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-17 21:53:15,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-17 21:53:15,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-17 21:53:15,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-17 21:53:15,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-17 21:53:15,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-17 21:53:15,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-17 21:53:15,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-17 21:53:15,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-17 21:53:15,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-17 21:53:15,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-17 21:53:15,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-17 21:53:15,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-17 21:53:15,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-17 21:53:15,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-17 21:53:15,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-17 21:53:15,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-17 21:53:15,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-17 21:53:15,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-17 21:53:15,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-17 21:53:15,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-17 21:53:15,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-17 21:53:15,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-17 21:53:15,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-17 21:53:15,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-17 21:53:15,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-17 21:53:15,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-17 21:53:15,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-17 21:53:15,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-17 21:53:15,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-17 21:53:15,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-17 21:53:15,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-17 21:53:15,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-17 21:53:15,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-17 21:53:15,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-17 21:53:15,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-17 21:53:15,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-17 21:53:15,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-17 21:53:15,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-17 21:53:15,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-17 21:53:15,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-17 21:53:15,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-17 21:53:15,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-17 21:53:15,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-17 21:53:15,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-17 21:53:15,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-17 21:53:15,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-17 21:53:15,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-17 21:53:15,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-17 21:53:15,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-17 21:53:15,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-17 21:53:15,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-17 21:53:15,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-17 21:53:15,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-17 21:53:15,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-17 21:53:15,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-17 21:53:15,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-17 21:53:15,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-17 21:53:15,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-17 21:53:15,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-17 21:53:15,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-17 21:53:15,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-17 21:53:15,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-17 21:53:15,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-17 21:53:15,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-17 21:53:15,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-17 21:53:15,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-17 21:53:15,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-17 21:53:15,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-17 21:53:15,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-17 21:53:15,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-17 21:53:15,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-17 21:53:15,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-17 21:53:15,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:15,219 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table32) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:15,219 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-17 21:53:15,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv871358531=369, srv64697211=312, srv653261481=314, srv1778141916=154, srv716510755=323, srv372169288=255, srv568235512=298, srv710229516=322, srv537137712=293, srv1682791519=131, srv642353994=311, srv1046656068=13, srv993792848=391, srv1202667070=39, srv99567927=392, srv1607947050=111, srv1677371877=129, srv1763526149=150, srv1763378353=149, srv531263272=289, srv448398842=270, srv802808934=348, srv77960001=340, srv453521623=271, srv162773041=114, srv563606057=295, srv1659238910=122, srv1279307656=55, srv1914255334=183, srv1296605582=61, srv2131597846=222, srv1375359355=72, srv1405269336=79, srv175680261=147, srv282211488=242, srv1412891098=82, srv375712549=257, srv191234370=182, srv1574132168=106, srv1853511149=168, srv617306884=307, srv268601623=238, srv1400099806=78, srv477381292=275, srv1279442050=56, srv535853198=292, srv1767480590=152, srv2100700333=211, srv1187847151=37, srv791064637=345, srv74478935=330, srv1206084762=41, srv1497856295=97, srv897884865=377, srv398014971=261, srv786136704=342, srv1429879791=86, srv1201763981=38, srv1415213844=84, srv302220908=243, srv156683359=105, srv1974497084=192, srv535358845=291, srv627763604=308, srv732106437=326, srv1679724304=130, srv576770232=299, srv478480013=276, srv1237250370=47, srv1169018295=34, srv32320833=248, srv594880186=304, srv216306370=225, srv656484240=315, srv818754908=354, srv1321058011=63, srv1256345927=52, srv1670847243=126, srv1515243164=99, srv1781378955=156, srv508388209=278, srv1910886192=180, srv1718898730=139, srv772274482=337, srv1433624807=87, srv848605385=359, srv2107957639=212, srv270591905=240, srv2126706298=219, srv2080681743=209, srv1683990934=132, srv11526364=28, srv761020484=334, srv1720507603=141, srv266276730=236, srv935213051=386, srv923440665=383, srv1911104834=181, srv1944131651=187, srv1162841146=30, srv1921230216=185, srv319459319=247, srv1168022226=33, srv57689659=300, srv716533901=324, srv1255156178=50, srv441379967=267, srv806979625=350, srv788255577=344, srv976533744=389, srv1317853355=62, srv1491073587=96, srv777865249=339, srv2130226580=221, srv873230355=370, srv971370780=388, srv2008207413=197, srv989150800=390, srv737980208=328, srv862088563=363, srv1716783669=138, srv1801293056=160, srv1363984373=68, srv515711115=282, srv1378945327=75, srv17002515=136, srv853498273=361, srv1825292480=165, srv2124576425=217, srv1889349340=175, srv527691188=286, srv1226737728=44, srv1781498156=157, srv104267960=11, srv1663644309=124, srv1672213768=127, srv740402944=329, srv555807163=294, srv566277037=296, srv734882045=327, srv1143683685=27, srv1021400966=5, srv694407347=319, srv1626790310=113, srv303328507=244, srv1869166689=171, srv781623755=341, srv40741117=264, srv1958265988=190, srv592380483=303, srv483565354=277, srv1531731329=100, srv359746409=253, srv1271131029=54, srv1007512250=2, srv1783696565=158, srv1284150263=57, srv1648846971=118, srv120365207=40, srv263085176=235, srv535080964=290, srv824739010=357, srv744793832=331, srv1073394883=18, srv1113186104=23, srv1370321362=69, srv328204461=249, srv1604342762=109, srv266460489=237, srv313806624=245, srv1473408823=93, srv865692144=366, srv42814401=265, srv104065318=10, srv1599236554=108, srv1476834435=94, srv1673452142=128, srv716892727=325, srv1501773847=98, srv791504502=346, srv367902453=254, srv254349567=232, srv2126102976=218, srv252714068=231, srv916506189=380, srv687320190=318, srv1000433998=0, srv51396503=281, srv648464134=313, srv908419423=379, srv204022732=200, srv1901650254=177, srv200342397=196, srv765841762=335, srv1849125656=167, srv235281774=226, srv2137298641=224, srv517347076=283, srv1687711069=135, srv800105834=347, srv1609917009=112, srv1038797815=9, srv863216619=365, srv921796978=382, srv895924009=376, srv319002955=246, srv611122413=305, srv1942590787=186, srv529333113=288, srv1053973741=14, srv1988512138=194, srv1037112526=8, srv442327402=268, srv2062351281=204, srv1240518778=48, srv471289019=274, srv1857090224=170, srv1543025253=101, srv1915241294=184, srv238420451=228, srv1747796150=145, srv1101668258=21, srv1437034663=88, srv1173449481=35, srv582652595=301, srv1739043021=144, srv1733173130=143, srv465824154=272, srv14463216=91, srv1720161153=140, srv1549403995=102, srv235920151=227, srv1909060246=179, srv527988350=287, srv1801762669=161, srv89501442=375, srv442994824=269, srv1414012241=83, srv165153258=121, srv1766333515=151, srv2063438865=205, srv1071671801=17, srv1638570398=116, srv1035353226=7, srv1856921753=169, srv1887444158=173, srv1897306674=176, srv1255718022=51, srv1260078897=53, srv1372945218=70, srv1163715139=31, srv175471358=146, srv1558656747=104, srv1463869996=92, srv124825865=49, srv1142495625=26, srv1397803774=77, srv1644508836=117, srv1807320536=162, srv1165273546=32, srv1650978005=120, srv1374260725=71, srv2065239646=206, srv1685737274=134, srv878340336=371, srv329463090=250, srv2112675912=213, srv1378293943=74, srv787532288=343, srv1292867420=59, srv519831391=285, srv1002018470=1, srv822141051=356, srv1229740495=45, srv706370370=321, srv255741565=233, srv1177018836=36, srv1223505925=43, srv745532463=332, srv1820836786=163, srv2127145828=220, srv2124524081=216, srv665150476=316, srv2132621880=223, srv2051928856=203, srv1903063797=178, srv881186303=373, srv1758974023=148, srv270549378=239, srv2014789268=198, srv1663469360=123, srv1331983035=65, srv1768940632=153, srv2084732799=210, srv1043044287=12, srv630246195=309, srv86319792=364, srv37305654=256, srv1650394019=119, srv1888093001=174, srv512441512=280, srv813969264=352, srv277288989=241, srv2017714321=199, srv1410469782=81, srv751917673=333, srv1443060804=89, srv1997063872=195, srv404426071=263, srv1443287861=90, srv695697141=320, srv636958174=310, srv1105584096=22, srv583005569=302, srv92523166=384, srv330226906=251, srv1684865692=133, srv381463497=258, srv567942525=297, srv1010403208=3, srv881516937=374, srv140693587=80, srv1872213858=172, srv262210172=234, srv846799674=358, srv851169364=360, srv880017865=372, srv129190288=58, srv401606217=262, srv669535820=317, srv1325384866=64, srv1377673856=73, srv1416276025=85, srv430431276=266, srv81513922=353, srv2044458062=201, srv2118166427=214, srv1665530216=125, srv2045587532=202, srv1824773168=164, srv2071913725=208, srv1295499145=60, srv1780304939=155, srv612277490=306, srv102508625=6, srv1637539828=115, srv820424989=355, srv50966795=279, srv1950402166=188, srv1207208580=42, srv1057648579=16, srv1084295726=20, srv39165764=260, srv959379519=387, srv2066402828=207, srv1556810592=103, srv1232731779=46, srv1606144164=110, srv1487275322=95, srv519310224=284, srv775221203=338, srv1079168923=19, srv1957834842=189, srv866525142=367, srv243907419=229, srv248553307=230, srv344122075=252, srv467461515=273, srv805609280=349, srv1018507425=4, srv1827511993=166, srv1704639485=137, srv855754935=362, srv1057024901=15, srv1116429721=24, srv927375731=385, srv1383836323=76, srv1584407048=107, srv809779157=351, srv1786622589=159, srv869541705=368, srv1123072042=25, srv1726136626=142, srv135800579=67, srv1958676591=191, srv390748718=259, srv907223095=378, srv76871917=336, srv1160170031=29, srv2119727728=215, srv918100507=381, srv1352063642=66, srv1975716907=193} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:15,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:15,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:15,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:15,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:15,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:15,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:15,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:15,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:15,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:15,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:15,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-17 21:53:15,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-17 21:53:15,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-17 21:53:15,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-17 21:53:15,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-17 21:53:15,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-17 21:53:15,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-17 21:53:15,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-17 21:53:15,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-17 21:53:15,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-17 21:53:15,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-17 21:53:15,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-17 21:53:15,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-17 21:53:15,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-17 21:53:15,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-17 21:53:15,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-17 21:53:15,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-17 21:53:15,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-17 21:53:15,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-17 21:53:15,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-17 21:53:15,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-17 21:53:15,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-17 21:53:15,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-17 21:53:15,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-17 21:53:15,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-17 21:53:15,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-17 21:53:15,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-17 21:53:15,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-17 21:53:15,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-17 21:53:15,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-17 21:53:15,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-17 21:53:15,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-17 21:53:15,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-17 21:53:15,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-17 21:53:15,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-17 21:53:15,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-17 21:53:15,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-17 21:53:15,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-17 21:53:15,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-17 21:53:15,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-17 21:53:15,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-17 21:53:15,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-17 21:53:15,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-17 21:53:15,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-17 21:53:15,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-17 21:53:15,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-17 21:53:15,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-17 21:53:15,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-17 21:53:15,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-17 21:53:15,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-17 21:53:15,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-17 21:53:15,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-17 21:53:15,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-17 21:53:15,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-17 21:53:15,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-17 21:53:15,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-17 21:53:15,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-17 21:53:15,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-17 21:53:15,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-17 21:53:15,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-17 21:53:15,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-17 21:53:15,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-17 21:53:15,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-17 21:53:15,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-17 21:53:15,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-17 21:53:15,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-17 21:53:15,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-17 21:53:15,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-17 21:53:15,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-17 21:53:15,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-17 21:53:15,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-17 21:53:15,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-17 21:53:15,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-17 21:53:15,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-17 21:53:15,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-17 21:53:15,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-17 21:53:15,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-17 21:53:15,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-17 21:53:15,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-17 21:53:15,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-17 21:53:15,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-17 21:53:15,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-17 21:53:15,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-17 21:53:15,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-17 21:53:15,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-17 21:53:15,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-17 21:53:15,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-17 21:53:15,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-17 21:53:15,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-17 21:53:15,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-17 21:53:15,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-17 21:53:15,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-17 21:53:15,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-17 21:53:15,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-17 21:53:15,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-17 21:53:15,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-17 21:53:15,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-17 21:53:15,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-17 21:53:15,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-17 21:53:15,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-17 21:53:15,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-17 21:53:15,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-17 21:53:15,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-17 21:53:15,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-17 21:53:15,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-17 21:53:15,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-17 21:53:15,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-17 21:53:15,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-17 21:53:15,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-17 21:53:15,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-17 21:53:15,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-17 21:53:15,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-17 21:53:15,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-17 21:53:15,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-17 21:53:15,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-17 21:53:15,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-17 21:53:15,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-17 21:53:15,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-17 21:53:15,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-17 21:53:15,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-17 21:53:15,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-17 21:53:15,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-17 21:53:15,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-17 21:53:15,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-17 21:53:15,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-17 21:53:15,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-17 21:53:15,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-17 21:53:15,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-17 21:53:15,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-17 21:53:15,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-17 21:53:15,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-17 21:53:15,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-17 21:53:15,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-17 21:53:15,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-17 21:53:15,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-17 21:53:15,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-17 21:53:15,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-17 21:53:15,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-17 21:53:15,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-17 21:53:15,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-17 21:53:15,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-17 21:53:15,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-17 21:53:15,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-17 21:53:15,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-17 21:53:15,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-17 21:53:15,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-17 21:53:15,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-17 21:53:15,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-17 21:53:15,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-17 21:53:15,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-17 21:53:15,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-17 21:53:15,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-17 21:53:15,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-17 21:53:15,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-17 21:53:15,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-17 21:53:15,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-17 21:53:15,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-17 21:53:15,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-17 21:53:15,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-17 21:53:15,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-17 21:53:15,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-17 21:53:15,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-17 21:53:15,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-17 21:53:15,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-17 21:53:15,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-17 21:53:15,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-17 21:53:15,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-17 21:53:15,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-17 21:53:15,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-17 21:53:15,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-17 21:53:15,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-17 21:53:15,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-17 21:53:15,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-17 21:53:15,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-17 21:53:15,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-17 21:53:15,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-17 21:53:15,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-17 21:53:15,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-17 21:53:15,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-17 21:53:15,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-17 21:53:15,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-17 21:53:15,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-17 21:53:15,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-17 21:53:15,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-17 21:53:15,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-17 21:53:15,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-17 21:53:15,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-17 21:53:15,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-17 21:53:15,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-17 21:53:15,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-17 21:53:15,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-17 21:53:15,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-17 21:53:15,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-17 21:53:15,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-17 21:53:15,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-17 21:53:15,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-17 21:53:15,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-17 21:53:15,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-17 21:53:15,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-17 21:53:15,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-17 21:53:15,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-17 21:53:15,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-17 21:53:15,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-17 21:53:15,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-17 21:53:15,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-17 21:53:15,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-17 21:53:15,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-17 21:53:15,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-17 21:53:15,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-17 21:53:15,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-17 21:53:15,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-17 21:53:15,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-17 21:53:15,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-17 21:53:15,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-17 21:53:15,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-17 21:53:15,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-17 21:53:15,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-17 21:53:15,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-17 21:53:15,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-17 21:53:15,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-17 21:53:15,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-17 21:53:15,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-17 21:53:15,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-17 21:53:15,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-17 21:53:15,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-17 21:53:15,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-17 21:53:15,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-17 21:53:15,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-17 21:53:15,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-17 21:53:15,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-17 21:53:15,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-17 21:53:15,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-17 21:53:15,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-17 21:53:15,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-17 21:53:15,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-17 21:53:15,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-17 21:53:15,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-17 21:53:15,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-17 21:53:15,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-17 21:53:15,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-17 21:53:15,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-17 21:53:15,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-17 21:53:15,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-17 21:53:15,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-17 21:53:15,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-17 21:53:15,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-17 21:53:15,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-17 21:53:15,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-17 21:53:15,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-17 21:53:15,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-17 21:53:15,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-17 21:53:15,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-17 21:53:15,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-17 21:53:15,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-17 21:53:15,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-17 21:53:15,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-17 21:53:15,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-17 21:53:15,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-17 21:53:15,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-17 21:53:15,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-17 21:53:15,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-17 21:53:15,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-17 21:53:15,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-17 21:53:15,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-17 21:53:15,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-17 21:53:15,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-17 21:53:15,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-17 21:53:15,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-17 21:53:15,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-17 21:53:15,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-17 21:53:15,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-17 21:53:15,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-17 21:53:15,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-17 21:53:15,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-17 21:53:15,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-17 21:53:15,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-17 21:53:15,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-17 21:53:15,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-17 21:53:15,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-17 21:53:15,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-17 21:53:15,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-17 21:53:15,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-17 21:53:15,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-17 21:53:15,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-17 21:53:15,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-17 21:53:15,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-17 21:53:15,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-17 21:53:15,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-17 21:53:15,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-17 21:53:15,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-17 21:53:15,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-17 21:53:15,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-17 21:53:15,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-17 21:53:15,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-17 21:53:15,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-17 21:53:15,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-17 21:53:15,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-17 21:53:15,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-17 21:53:15,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-17 21:53:15,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-17 21:53:15,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-17 21:53:15,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-17 21:53:15,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-17 21:53:15,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-17 21:53:15,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-17 21:53:15,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-17 21:53:15,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-17 21:53:15,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-17 21:53:15,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-17 21:53:15,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-17 21:53:15,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-17 21:53:15,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-17 21:53:15,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-17 21:53:15,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-17 21:53:15,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-17 21:53:15,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-17 21:53:15,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-17 21:53:15,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-17 21:53:15,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-17 21:53:15,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-17 21:53:15,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-17 21:53:15,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-17 21:53:15,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-17 21:53:15,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-17 21:53:15,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-17 21:53:15,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-17 21:53:15,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-17 21:53:15,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-17 21:53:15,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-17 21:53:15,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-17 21:53:15,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-17 21:53:15,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-17 21:53:15,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-17 21:53:15,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-17 21:53:15,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-17 21:53:15,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-17 21:53:15,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-17 21:53:15,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-17 21:53:15,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-17 21:53:15,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-17 21:53:15,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-17 21:53:15,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-17 21:53:15,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-17 21:53:15,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-17 21:53:15,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-17 21:53:15,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-17 21:53:15,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-17 21:53:15,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-17 21:53:15,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-17 21:53:15,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-17 21:53:15,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-17 21:53:15,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-17 21:53:15,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-17 21:53:15,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-17 21:53:15,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-17 21:53:15,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-17 21:53:15,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-17 21:53:15,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-17 21:53:15,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-17 21:53:15,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-17 21:53:15,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-17 21:53:15,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-17 21:53:15,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-17 21:53:15,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-17 21:53:15,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-17 21:53:15,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-17 21:53:15,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-17 21:53:15,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-17 21:53:15,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-17 21:53:15,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-17 21:53:15,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-17 21:53:15,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-17 21:53:15,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-17 21:53:15,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-17 21:53:15,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-17 21:53:15,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-17 21:53:15,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-17 21:53:15,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-17 21:53:15,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-17 21:53:15,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-17 21:53:15,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-17 21:53:15,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-17 21:53:15,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-17 21:53:15,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:15,235 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:15,235 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table33
2023-07-17 21:53:15,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv871358531=369, srv64697211=312, srv653261481=314, srv1778141916=154, srv716510755=323, srv372169288=255, srv568235512=298, srv710229516=322, srv537137712=293, srv1682791519=131, srv642353994=311, srv1046656068=13, srv993792848=391, srv1202667070=39, srv99567927=392, srv1607947050=111, srv1677371877=129, srv1763526149=150, srv1763378353=149, srv531263272=289, srv448398842=270, srv802808934=348, srv77960001=340, srv453521623=271, srv162773041=114, srv563606057=295, srv1659238910=122, srv1279307656=55, srv1914255334=183, srv1296605582=61, srv2131597846=222, srv1375359355=72, srv1405269336=79, srv175680261=147, srv282211488=242, srv1412891098=82, srv375712549=257, srv191234370=182, srv1574132168=106, srv1853511149=168, srv617306884=307, srv268601623=238, srv1400099806=78, srv477381292=275, srv1279442050=56, srv535853198=292, srv1767480590=152, srv2100700333=211, srv1187847151=37, srv791064637=345, srv74478935=330, srv1206084762=41, srv1497856295=97, srv897884865=377, srv398014971=261, srv786136704=342, srv1429879791=86, srv1201763981=38, srv1415213844=84, srv302220908=243, srv156683359=105, srv1974497084=192, srv535358845=291, srv627763604=308, srv732106437=326, srv1679724304=130, srv576770232=299, srv478480013=276, srv1237250370=47, srv1169018295=34, srv32320833=248, srv594880186=304, srv216306370=225, srv656484240=315, srv818754908=354, srv1321058011=63, srv1256345927=52, srv1670847243=126, srv1515243164=99, srv1781378955=156, srv508388209=278, srv1910886192=180, srv1718898730=139, srv772274482=337, srv1433624807=87, srv848605385=359, srv2107957639=212, srv270591905=240, srv2126706298=219, srv2080681743=209, srv1683990934=132, srv11526364=28, srv761020484=334, srv1720507603=141, srv266276730=236, srv935213051=386, srv923440665=383, srv1911104834=181, srv1944131651=187, srv1162841146=30, srv1921230216=185, srv319459319=247, srv1168022226=33, srv57689659=300, srv716533901=324, srv1255156178=50, srv441379967=267, srv806979625=350, srv788255577=344, srv976533744=389, srv1317853355=62, srv1491073587=96, srv777865249=339, srv2130226580=221, srv873230355=370, srv971370780=388, srv2008207413=197, srv989150800=390, srv737980208=328, srv862088563=363, srv1716783669=138, srv1801293056=160, srv1363984373=68, srv515711115=282, srv1378945327=75, srv17002515=136, srv853498273=361, srv1825292480=165, srv2124576425=217, srv1889349340=175, srv527691188=286, srv1226737728=44, srv1781498156=157, srv104267960=11, srv1663644309=124, srv1672213768=127, srv740402944=329, srv555807163=294, srv566277037=296, srv734882045=327, srv1143683685=27, srv1021400966=5, srv694407347=319, srv1626790310=113, srv303328507=244, srv1869166689=171, srv781623755=341, srv40741117=264, srv1958265988=190, srv592380483=303, srv483565354=277, srv1531731329=100, srv359746409=253, srv1271131029=54, srv1007512250=2, srv1783696565=158, srv1284150263=57, srv1648846971=118, srv120365207=40, srv263085176=235, srv535080964=290, srv824739010=357, srv744793832=331, srv1073394883=18, srv1113186104=23, srv1370321362=69, srv328204461=249, srv1604342762=109, srv266460489=237, srv313806624=245, srv1473408823=93, srv865692144=366, srv42814401=265, srv104065318=10, srv1599236554=108, srv1476834435=94, srv1673452142=128, srv716892727=325, srv1501773847=98, srv791504502=346, srv367902453=254, srv254349567=232, srv2126102976=218, srv252714068=231, srv916506189=380, srv687320190=318, srv1000433998=0, srv51396503=281, srv648464134=313, srv908419423=379, srv204022732=200, srv1901650254=177, srv200342397=196, srv765841762=335, srv1849125656=167, srv235281774=226, srv2137298641=224, srv517347076=283, srv1687711069=135, srv800105834=347, srv1609917009=112, srv1038797815=9, srv863216619=365, srv921796978=382, srv895924009=376, srv319002955=246, srv611122413=305, srv1942590787=186, srv529333113=288, srv1053973741=14, srv1988512138=194, srv1037112526=8, srv442327402=268, srv2062351281=204, srv1240518778=48, srv471289019=274, srv1857090224=170, srv1543025253=101, srv1915241294=184, srv238420451=228, srv1747796150=145, srv1101668258=21, srv1437034663=88, srv1173449481=35, srv582652595=301, srv1739043021=144, srv1733173130=143, srv465824154=272, srv14463216=91, srv1720161153=140, srv1549403995=102, srv235920151=227, srv1909060246=179, srv527988350=287, srv1801762669=161, srv89501442=375, srv442994824=269, srv1414012241=83, srv165153258=121, srv1766333515=151, srv2063438865=205, srv1071671801=17, srv1638570398=116, srv1035353226=7, srv1856921753=169, srv1887444158=173, srv1897306674=176, srv1255718022=51, srv1260078897=53, srv1372945218=70, srv1163715139=31, srv175471358=146, srv1558656747=104, srv1463869996=92, srv124825865=49, srv1142495625=26, srv1397803774=77, srv1644508836=117, srv1807320536=162, srv1165273546=32, srv1650978005=120, srv1374260725=71, srv2065239646=206, srv1685737274=134, srv878340336=371, srv329463090=250, srv2112675912=213, srv1378293943=74, srv787532288=343, srv1292867420=59, srv519831391=285, srv1002018470=1, srv822141051=356, srv1229740495=45, srv706370370=321, srv255741565=233, srv1177018836=36, srv1223505925=43, srv745532463=332, srv1820836786=163, srv2127145828=220, srv2124524081=216, srv665150476=316, srv2132621880=223, srv2051928856=203, srv1903063797=178, srv881186303=373, srv1758974023=148, srv270549378=239, srv2014789268=198, srv1663469360=123, srv1331983035=65, srv1768940632=153, srv2084732799=210, srv1043044287=12, srv630246195=309, srv86319792=364, srv37305654=256, srv1650394019=119, srv1888093001=174, srv512441512=280, srv813969264=352, srv277288989=241, srv2017714321=199, srv1410469782=81, srv751917673=333, srv1443060804=89, srv1997063872=195, srv404426071=263, srv1443287861=90, srv695697141=320, srv636958174=310, srv1105584096=22, srv583005569=302, srv92523166=384, srv330226906=251, srv1684865692=133, srv381463497=258, srv567942525=297, srv1010403208=3, srv881516937=374, srv140693587=80, srv1872213858=172, srv262210172=234, srv846799674=358, srv851169364=360, srv880017865=372, srv129190288=58, srv401606217=262, srv669535820=317, srv1325384866=64, srv1377673856=73, srv1416276025=85, srv430431276=266, srv81513922=353, srv2044458062=201, srv2118166427=214, srv1665530216=125, srv2045587532=202, srv1824773168=164, srv2071913725=208, srv1295499145=60, srv1780304939=155, srv612277490=306, srv102508625=6, srv1637539828=115, srv820424989=355, srv50966795=279, srv1950402166=188, srv1207208580=42, srv1057648579=16, srv1084295726=20, srv39165764=260, srv959379519=387, srv2066402828=207, srv1556810592=103, srv1232731779=46, srv1606144164=110, srv1487275322=95, srv519310224=284, srv775221203=338, srv1079168923=19, srv1957834842=189, srv866525142=367, srv243907419=229, srv248553307=230, srv344122075=252, srv467461515=273, srv805609280=349, srv1018507425=4, srv1827511993=166, srv1704639485=137, srv855754935=362, srv1057024901=15, srv1116429721=24, srv927375731=385, srv1383836323=76, srv1584407048=107, srv809779157=351, srv1786622589=159, srv869541705=368, srv1123072042=25, srv1726136626=142, srv135800579=67, srv1958676591=191, srv390748718=259, srv907223095=378, srv76871917=336, srv1160170031=29, srv2119727728=215, srv918100507=381, srv1352063642=66, srv1975716907=193} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:15,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:15,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:15,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:15,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:15,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:15,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:15,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:15,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:15,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:15,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:15,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-17 21:53:15,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-17 21:53:15,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-17 21:53:15,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-17 21:53:15,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-17 21:53:15,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-17 21:53:15,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-17 21:53:15,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-17 21:53:15,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-17 21:53:15,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-17 21:53:15,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-17 21:53:15,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-17 21:53:15,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-17 21:53:15,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-17 21:53:15,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-17 21:53:15,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-17 21:53:15,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-17 21:53:15,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-17 21:53:15,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-17 21:53:15,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-17 21:53:15,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-17 21:53:15,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-17 21:53:15,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-17 21:53:15,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-17 21:53:15,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-17 21:53:15,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-17 21:53:15,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-17 21:53:15,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-17 21:53:15,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-17 21:53:15,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-17 21:53:15,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-17 21:53:15,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-17 21:53:15,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-17 21:53:15,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-17 21:53:15,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-17 21:53:15,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-17 21:53:15,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-17 21:53:15,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-17 21:53:15,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-17 21:53:15,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-17 21:53:15,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-17 21:53:15,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-17 21:53:15,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-17 21:53:15,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-17 21:53:15,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-17 21:53:15,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-17 21:53:15,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-17 21:53:15,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-17 21:53:15,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-17 21:53:15,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-17 21:53:15,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-17 21:53:15,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-17 21:53:15,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-17 21:53:15,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-17 21:53:15,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-17 21:53:15,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-17 21:53:15,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-17 21:53:15,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-17 21:53:15,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-17 21:53:15,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-17 21:53:15,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-17 21:53:15,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-17 21:53:15,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-17 21:53:15,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-17 21:53:15,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-17 21:53:15,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-17 21:53:15,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-17 21:53:15,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-17 21:53:15,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-17 21:53:15,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-17 21:53:15,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-17 21:53:15,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-17 21:53:15,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-17 21:53:15,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-17 21:53:15,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-17 21:53:15,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-17 21:53:15,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-17 21:53:15,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-17 21:53:15,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-17 21:53:15,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-17 21:53:15,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-17 21:53:15,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-17 21:53:15,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-17 21:53:15,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-17 21:53:15,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-17 21:53:15,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-17 21:53:15,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-17 21:53:15,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-17 21:53:15,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-17 21:53:15,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-17 21:53:15,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-17 21:53:15,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-17 21:53:15,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-17 21:53:15,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-17 21:53:15,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-17 21:53:15,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-17 21:53:15,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-17 21:53:15,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-17 21:53:15,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-17 21:53:15,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-17 21:53:15,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-17 21:53:15,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-17 21:53:15,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-17 21:53:15,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-17 21:53:15,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-17 21:53:15,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-17 21:53:15,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-17 21:53:15,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-17 21:53:15,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-17 21:53:15,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-17 21:53:15,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-17 21:53:15,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-17 21:53:15,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-17 21:53:15,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-17 21:53:15,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-17 21:53:15,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-17 21:53:15,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-17 21:53:15,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-17 21:53:15,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-17 21:53:15,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-17 21:53:15,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-17 21:53:15,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-17 21:53:15,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-17 21:53:15,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-17 21:53:15,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-17 21:53:15,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-17 21:53:15,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-17 21:53:15,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-17 21:53:15,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-17 21:53:15,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-17 21:53:15,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-17 21:53:15,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-17 21:53:15,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-17 21:53:15,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-17 21:53:15,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-17 21:53:15,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-17 21:53:15,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-17 21:53:15,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-17 21:53:15,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-17 21:53:15,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-17 21:53:15,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-17 21:53:15,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-17 21:53:15,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-17 21:53:15,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-17 21:53:15,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-17 21:53:15,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-17 21:53:15,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-17 21:53:15,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-17 21:53:15,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-17 21:53:15,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-17 21:53:15,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-17 21:53:15,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-17 21:53:15,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-17 21:53:15,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-17 21:53:15,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-17 21:53:15,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-17 21:53:15,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-17 21:53:15,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-17 21:53:15,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-17 21:53:15,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-17 21:53:15,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-17 21:53:15,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-17 21:53:15,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-17 21:53:15,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-17 21:53:15,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-17 21:53:15,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-17 21:53:15,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-17 21:53:15,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-17 21:53:15,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-17 21:53:15,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-17 21:53:15,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-17 21:53:15,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-17 21:53:15,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-17 21:53:15,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-17 21:53:15,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-17 21:53:15,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-17 21:53:15,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-17 21:53:15,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-17 21:53:15,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-17 21:53:15,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-17 21:53:15,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-17 21:53:15,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-17 21:53:15,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-17 21:53:15,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-17 21:53:15,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-17 21:53:15,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-17 21:53:15,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-17 21:53:15,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-17 21:53:15,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-17 21:53:15,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-17 21:53:15,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-17 21:53:15,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-17 21:53:15,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-17 21:53:15,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-17 21:53:15,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-17 21:53:15,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-17 21:53:15,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-17 21:53:15,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-17 21:53:15,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-17 21:53:15,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-17 21:53:15,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-17 21:53:15,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-17 21:53:15,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-17 21:53:15,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-17 21:53:15,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-17 21:53:15,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-17 21:53:15,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-17 21:53:15,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-17 21:53:15,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-17 21:53:15,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-17 21:53:15,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-17 21:53:15,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-17 21:53:15,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-17 21:53:15,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-17 21:53:15,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-17 21:53:15,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-17 21:53:15,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-17 21:53:15,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-17 21:53:15,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-17 21:53:15,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-17 21:53:15,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-17 21:53:15,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-17 21:53:15,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-17 21:53:15,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-17 21:53:15,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-17 21:53:15,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-17 21:53:15,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-17 21:53:15,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-17 21:53:15,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-17 21:53:15,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-17 21:53:15,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-17 21:53:15,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-17 21:53:15,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-17 21:53:15,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-17 21:53:15,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-17 21:53:15,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-17 21:53:15,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-17 21:53:15,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-17 21:53:15,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-17 21:53:15,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-17 21:53:15,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-17 21:53:15,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-17 21:53:15,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-17 21:53:15,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-17 21:53:15,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-17 21:53:15,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-17 21:53:15,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-17 21:53:15,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-17 21:53:15,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-17 21:53:15,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-17 21:53:15,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-17 21:53:15,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-17 21:53:15,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-17 21:53:15,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-17 21:53:15,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-17 21:53:15,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-17 21:53:15,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-17 21:53:15,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-17 21:53:15,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-17 21:53:15,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-17 21:53:15,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-17 21:53:15,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-17 21:53:15,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-17 21:53:15,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-17 21:53:15,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-17 21:53:15,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-17 21:53:15,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-17 21:53:15,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-17 21:53:15,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-17 21:53:15,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-17 21:53:15,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-17 21:53:15,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-17 21:53:15,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-17 21:53:15,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-17 21:53:15,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-17 21:53:15,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-17 21:53:15,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-17 21:53:15,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-17 21:53:15,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-17 21:53:15,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-17 21:53:15,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-17 21:53:15,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-17 21:53:15,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-17 21:53:15,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-17 21:53:15,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-17 21:53:15,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-17 21:53:15,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-17 21:53:15,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-17 21:53:15,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-17 21:53:15,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-17 21:53:15,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-17 21:53:15,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-17 21:53:15,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-17 21:53:15,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-17 21:53:15,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-17 21:53:15,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-17 21:53:15,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-17 21:53:15,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-17 21:53:15,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-17 21:53:15,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-17 21:53:15,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-17 21:53:15,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-17 21:53:15,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-17 21:53:15,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-17 21:53:15,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-17 21:53:15,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-17 21:53:15,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-17 21:53:15,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-17 21:53:15,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-17 21:53:15,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-17 21:53:15,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-17 21:53:15,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-17 21:53:15,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-17 21:53:15,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-17 21:53:15,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-17 21:53:15,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-17 21:53:15,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-17 21:53:15,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-17 21:53:15,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-17 21:53:15,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-17 21:53:15,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-17 21:53:15,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-17 21:53:15,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-17 21:53:15,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-17 21:53:15,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-17 21:53:15,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-17 21:53:15,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-17 21:53:15,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-17 21:53:15,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-17 21:53:15,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-17 21:53:15,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-17 21:53:15,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-17 21:53:15,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-17 21:53:15,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-17 21:53:15,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-17 21:53:15,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-17 21:53:15,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-17 21:53:15,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-17 21:53:15,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-17 21:53:15,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-17 21:53:15,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-17 21:53:15,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-17 21:53:15,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-17 21:53:15,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-17 21:53:15,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-17 21:53:15,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-17 21:53:15,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-17 21:53:15,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-17 21:53:15,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-17 21:53:15,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-17 21:53:15,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-17 21:53:15,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-17 21:53:15,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-17 21:53:15,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-17 21:53:15,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-17 21:53:15,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-17 21:53:15,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-17 21:53:15,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-17 21:53:15,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-17 21:53:15,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-17 21:53:15,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-17 21:53:15,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-17 21:53:15,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-17 21:53:15,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-17 21:53:15,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-17 21:53:15,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-17 21:53:15,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-17 21:53:15,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-17 21:53:15,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-17 21:53:15,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-17 21:53:15,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-17 21:53:15,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-17 21:53:15,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-17 21:53:15,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-17 21:53:15,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-17 21:53:15,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-17 21:53:15,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-17 21:53:15,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-17 21:53:15,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-17 21:53:15,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-17 21:53:15,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-17 21:53:15,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-17 21:53:15,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-17 21:53:15,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:15,250 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table33) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:15,250 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-17 21:53:15,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv871358531=369, srv64697211=312, srv653261481=314, srv1778141916=154, srv716510755=323, srv372169288=255, srv568235512=298, srv710229516=322, srv537137712=293, srv1682791519=131, srv642353994=311, srv1046656068=13, srv993792848=391, srv1202667070=39, srv99567927=392, srv1607947050=111, srv1677371877=129, srv1763526149=150, srv1763378353=149, srv531263272=289, srv448398842=270, srv802808934=348, srv77960001=340, srv453521623=271, srv162773041=114, srv563606057=295, srv1659238910=122, srv1279307656=55, srv1914255334=183, srv1296605582=61, srv2131597846=222, srv1375359355=72, srv1405269336=79, srv175680261=147, srv282211488=242, srv1412891098=82, srv375712549=257, srv191234370=182, srv1574132168=106, srv1853511149=168, srv617306884=307, srv268601623=238, srv1400099806=78, srv477381292=275, srv1279442050=56, srv535853198=292, srv1767480590=152, srv2100700333=211, srv1187847151=37, srv791064637=345, srv74478935=330, srv1206084762=41, srv1497856295=97, srv897884865=377, srv398014971=261, srv786136704=342, srv1429879791=86, srv1201763981=38, srv1415213844=84, srv302220908=243, srv156683359=105, srv1974497084=192, srv535358845=291, srv627763604=308, srv732106437=326, srv1679724304=130, srv576770232=299, srv478480013=276, srv1237250370=47, srv1169018295=34, srv32320833=248, srv594880186=304, srv216306370=225, srv656484240=315, srv818754908=354, srv1321058011=63, srv1256345927=52, srv1670847243=126, srv1515243164=99, srv1781378955=156, srv508388209=278, srv1910886192=180, srv1718898730=139, srv772274482=337, srv1433624807=87, srv848605385=359, srv2107957639=212, srv270591905=240, srv2126706298=219, srv2080681743=209, srv1683990934=132, srv11526364=28, srv761020484=334, srv1720507603=141, srv266276730=236, srv935213051=386, srv923440665=383, srv1911104834=181, srv1944131651=187, srv1162841146=30, srv1921230216=185, srv319459319=247, srv1168022226=33, srv57689659=300, srv716533901=324, srv1255156178=50, srv441379967=267, srv806979625=350, srv788255577=344, srv976533744=389, srv1317853355=62, srv1491073587=96, srv777865249=339, srv2130226580=221, srv873230355=370, srv971370780=388, srv2008207413=197, srv989150800=390, srv737980208=328, srv862088563=363, srv1716783669=138, srv1801293056=160, srv1363984373=68, srv515711115=282, srv1378945327=75, srv17002515=136, srv853498273=361, srv1825292480=165, srv2124576425=217, srv1889349340=175, srv527691188=286, srv1226737728=44, srv1781498156=157, srv104267960=11, srv1663644309=124, srv1672213768=127, srv740402944=329, srv555807163=294, srv566277037=296, srv734882045=327, srv1143683685=27, srv1021400966=5, srv694407347=319, srv1626790310=113, srv303328507=244, srv1869166689=171, srv781623755=341, srv40741117=264, srv1958265988=190, srv592380483=303, srv483565354=277, srv1531731329=100, srv359746409=253, srv1271131029=54, srv1007512250=2, srv1783696565=158, srv1284150263=57, srv1648846971=118, srv120365207=40, srv263085176=235, srv535080964=290, srv824739010=357, srv744793832=331, srv1073394883=18, srv1113186104=23, srv1370321362=69, srv328204461=249, srv1604342762=109, srv266460489=237, srv313806624=245, srv1473408823=93, srv865692144=366, srv42814401=265, srv104065318=10, srv1599236554=108, srv1476834435=94, srv1673452142=128, srv716892727=325, srv1501773847=98, srv791504502=346, srv367902453=254, srv254349567=232, srv2126102976=218, srv252714068=231, srv916506189=380, srv687320190=318, srv1000433998=0, srv51396503=281, srv648464134=313, srv908419423=379, srv204022732=200, srv1901650254=177, srv200342397=196, srv765841762=335, srv1849125656=167, srv235281774=226, srv2137298641=224, srv517347076=283, srv1687711069=135, srv800105834=347, srv1609917009=112, srv1038797815=9, srv863216619=365, srv921796978=382, srv895924009=376, srv319002955=246, srv611122413=305, srv1942590787=186, srv529333113=288, srv1053973741=14, srv1988512138=194, srv1037112526=8, srv442327402=268, srv2062351281=204, srv1240518778=48, srv471289019=274, srv1857090224=170, srv1543025253=101, srv1915241294=184, srv238420451=228, srv1747796150=145, srv1101668258=21, srv1437034663=88, srv1173449481=35, srv582652595=301, srv1739043021=144, srv1733173130=143, srv465824154=272, srv14463216=91, srv1720161153=140, srv1549403995=102, srv235920151=227, srv1909060246=179, srv527988350=287, srv1801762669=161, srv89501442=375, srv442994824=269, srv1414012241=83, srv165153258=121, srv1766333515=151, srv2063438865=205, srv1071671801=17, srv1638570398=116, srv1035353226=7, srv1856921753=169, srv1887444158=173, srv1897306674=176, srv1255718022=51, srv1260078897=53, srv1372945218=70, srv1163715139=31, srv175471358=146, srv1558656747=104, srv1463869996=92, srv124825865=49, srv1142495625=26, srv1397803774=77, srv1644508836=117, srv1807320536=162, srv1165273546=32, srv1650978005=120, srv1374260725=71, srv2065239646=206, srv1685737274=134, srv878340336=371, srv329463090=250, srv2112675912=213, srv1378293943=74, srv787532288=343, srv1292867420=59, srv519831391=285, srv1002018470=1, srv822141051=356, srv1229740495=45, srv706370370=321, srv255741565=233, srv1177018836=36, srv1223505925=43, srv745532463=332, srv1820836786=163, srv2127145828=220, srv2124524081=216, srv665150476=316, srv2132621880=223, srv2051928856=203, srv1903063797=178, srv881186303=373, srv1758974023=148, srv270549378=239, srv2014789268=198, srv1663469360=123, srv1331983035=65, srv1768940632=153, srv2084732799=210, srv1043044287=12, srv630246195=309, srv86319792=364, srv37305654=256, srv1650394019=119, srv1888093001=174, srv512441512=280, srv813969264=352, srv277288989=241, srv2017714321=199, srv1410469782=81, srv751917673=333, srv1443060804=89, srv1997063872=195, srv404426071=263, srv1443287861=90, srv695697141=320, srv636958174=310, srv1105584096=22, srv583005569=302, srv92523166=384, srv330226906=251, srv1684865692=133, srv381463497=258, srv567942525=297, srv1010403208=3, srv881516937=374, srv140693587=80, srv1872213858=172, srv262210172=234, srv846799674=358, srv851169364=360, srv880017865=372, srv129190288=58, srv401606217=262, srv669535820=317, srv1325384866=64, srv1377673856=73, srv1416276025=85, srv430431276=266, srv81513922=353, srv2044458062=201, srv2118166427=214, srv1665530216=125, srv2045587532=202, srv1824773168=164, srv2071913725=208, srv1295499145=60, srv1780304939=155, srv612277490=306, srv102508625=6, srv1637539828=115, srv820424989=355, srv50966795=279, srv1950402166=188, srv1207208580=42, srv1057648579=16, srv1084295726=20, srv39165764=260, srv959379519=387, srv2066402828=207, srv1556810592=103, srv1232731779=46, srv1606144164=110, srv1487275322=95, srv519310224=284, srv775221203=338, srv1079168923=19, srv1957834842=189, srv866525142=367, srv243907419=229, srv248553307=230, srv344122075=252, srv467461515=273, srv805609280=349, srv1018507425=4, srv1827511993=166, srv1704639485=137, srv855754935=362, srv1057024901=15, srv1116429721=24, srv927375731=385, srv1383836323=76, srv1584407048=107, srv809779157=351, srv1786622589=159, srv869541705=368, srv1123072042=25, srv1726136626=142, srv135800579=67, srv1958676591=191, srv390748718=259, srv907223095=378, srv76871917=336, srv1160170031=29, srv2119727728=215, srv918100507=381, srv1352063642=66, srv1975716907=193} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:15,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:15,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:15,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:15,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:15,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:15,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:15,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:15,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:15,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:15,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:15,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-17 21:53:15,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-17 21:53:15,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-17 21:53:15,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-17 21:53:15,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-17 21:53:15,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-17 21:53:15,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-17 21:53:15,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-17 21:53:15,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-17 21:53:15,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-17 21:53:15,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-17 21:53:15,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-17 21:53:15,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-17 21:53:15,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-17 21:53:15,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-17 21:53:15,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-17 21:53:15,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-17 21:53:15,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-17 21:53:15,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-17 21:53:15,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-17 21:53:15,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-17 21:53:15,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-17 21:53:15,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-17 21:53:15,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-17 21:53:15,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-17 21:53:15,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-17 21:53:15,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-17 21:53:15,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-17 21:53:15,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-17 21:53:15,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-17 21:53:15,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-17 21:53:15,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-17 21:53:15,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-17 21:53:15,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-17 21:53:15,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-17 21:53:15,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-17 21:53:15,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-17 21:53:15,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-17 21:53:15,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-17 21:53:15,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-17 21:53:15,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-17 21:53:15,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-17 21:53:15,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-17 21:53:15,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-17 21:53:15,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-17 21:53:15,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-17 21:53:15,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-17 21:53:15,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-17 21:53:15,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-17 21:53:15,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-17 21:53:15,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-17 21:53:15,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-17 21:53:15,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-17 21:53:15,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-17 21:53:15,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-17 21:53:15,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-17 21:53:15,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-17 21:53:15,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-17 21:53:15,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-17 21:53:15,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-17 21:53:15,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-17 21:53:15,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-17 21:53:15,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-17 21:53:15,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-17 21:53:15,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-17 21:53:15,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-17 21:53:15,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-17 21:53:15,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-17 21:53:15,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-17 21:53:15,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-17 21:53:15,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-17 21:53:15,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-17 21:53:15,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-17 21:53:15,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-17 21:53:15,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-17 21:53:15,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-17 21:53:15,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-17 21:53:15,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-17 21:53:15,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-17 21:53:15,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-17 21:53:15,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-17 21:53:15,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-17 21:53:15,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-17 21:53:15,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-17 21:53:15,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-17 21:53:15,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-17 21:53:15,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-17 21:53:15,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-17 21:53:15,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-17 21:53:15,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-17 21:53:15,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-17 21:53:15,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-17 21:53:15,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-17 21:53:15,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-17 21:53:15,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-17 21:53:15,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-17 21:53:15,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-17 21:53:15,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-17 21:53:15,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-17 21:53:15,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-17 21:53:15,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-17 21:53:15,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-17 21:53:15,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-17 21:53:15,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-17 21:53:15,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-17 21:53:15,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-17 21:53:15,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-17 21:53:15,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-17 21:53:15,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-17 21:53:15,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-17 21:53:15,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-17 21:53:15,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-17 21:53:15,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-17 21:53:15,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-17 21:53:15,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-17 21:53:15,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-17 21:53:15,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-17 21:53:15,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-17 21:53:15,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-17 21:53:15,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-17 21:53:15,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-17 21:53:15,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-17 21:53:15,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-17 21:53:15,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-17 21:53:15,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-17 21:53:15,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-17 21:53:15,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-17 21:53:15,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-17 21:53:15,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-17 21:53:15,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-17 21:53:15,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-17 21:53:15,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-17 21:53:15,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-17 21:53:15,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-17 21:53:15,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-17 21:53:15,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-17 21:53:15,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-17 21:53:15,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-17 21:53:15,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-17 21:53:15,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-17 21:53:15,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-17 21:53:15,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-17 21:53:15,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-17 21:53:15,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-17 21:53:15,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-17 21:53:15,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-17 21:53:15,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-17 21:53:15,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-17 21:53:15,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-17 21:53:15,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-17 21:53:15,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-17 21:53:15,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-17 21:53:15,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-17 21:53:15,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-17 21:53:15,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-17 21:53:15,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-17 21:53:15,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-17 21:53:15,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-17 21:53:15,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-17 21:53:15,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-17 21:53:15,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-17 21:53:15,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-17 21:53:15,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-17 21:53:15,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-17 21:53:15,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-17 21:53:15,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-17 21:53:15,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-17 21:53:15,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-17 21:53:15,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-17 21:53:15,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-17 21:53:15,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-17 21:53:15,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-17 21:53:15,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-17 21:53:15,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-17 21:53:15,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-17 21:53:15,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-17 21:53:15,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-17 21:53:15,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-17 21:53:15,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-17 21:53:15,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-17 21:53:15,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-17 21:53:15,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-17 21:53:15,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-17 21:53:15,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-17 21:53:15,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-17 21:53:15,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-17 21:53:15,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-17 21:53:15,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-17 21:53:15,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-17 21:53:15,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-17 21:53:15,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-17 21:53:15,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-17 21:53:15,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-17 21:53:15,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-17 21:53:15,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-17 21:53:15,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-17 21:53:15,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-17 21:53:15,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-17 21:53:15,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-17 21:53:15,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-17 21:53:15,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-17 21:53:15,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-17 21:53:15,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-17 21:53:15,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-17 21:53:15,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-17 21:53:15,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-17 21:53:15,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-17 21:53:15,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-17 21:53:15,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-17 21:53:15,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-17 21:53:15,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-17 21:53:15,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-17 21:53:15,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-17 21:53:15,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-17 21:53:15,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-17 21:53:15,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-17 21:53:15,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-17 21:53:15,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-17 21:53:15,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-17 21:53:15,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-17 21:53:15,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-17 21:53:15,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-17 21:53:15,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-17 21:53:15,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-17 21:53:15,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-17 21:53:15,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-17 21:53:15,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-17 21:53:15,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-17 21:53:15,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-17 21:53:15,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-17 21:53:15,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-17 21:53:15,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-17 21:53:15,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-17 21:53:15,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-17 21:53:15,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-17 21:53:15,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-17 21:53:15,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-17 21:53:15,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-17 21:53:15,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-17 21:53:15,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-17 21:53:15,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-17 21:53:15,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-17 21:53:15,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-17 21:53:15,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-17 21:53:15,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-17 21:53:15,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-17 21:53:15,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-17 21:53:15,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-17 21:53:15,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-17 21:53:15,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-17 21:53:15,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-17 21:53:15,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-17 21:53:15,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-17 21:53:15,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-17 21:53:15,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-17 21:53:15,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-17 21:53:15,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-17 21:53:15,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-17 21:53:15,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-17 21:53:15,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-17 21:53:15,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-17 21:53:15,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-17 21:53:15,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-17 21:53:15,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-17 21:53:15,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-17 21:53:15,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-17 21:53:15,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-17 21:53:15,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-17 21:53:15,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-17 21:53:15,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-17 21:53:15,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-17 21:53:15,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-17 21:53:15,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-17 21:53:15,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-17 21:53:15,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-17 21:53:15,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-17 21:53:15,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-17 21:53:15,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-17 21:53:15,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-17 21:53:15,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-17 21:53:15,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-17 21:53:15,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-17 21:53:15,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-17 21:53:15,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-17 21:53:15,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-17 21:53:15,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-17 21:53:15,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-17 21:53:15,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-17 21:53:15,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-17 21:53:15,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-17 21:53:15,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-17 21:53:15,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-17 21:53:15,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-17 21:53:15,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-17 21:53:15,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-17 21:53:15,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-17 21:53:15,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-17 21:53:15,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-17 21:53:15,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-17 21:53:15,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-17 21:53:15,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-17 21:53:15,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-17 21:53:15,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-17 21:53:15,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-17 21:53:15,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-17 21:53:15,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-17 21:53:15,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-17 21:53:15,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-17 21:53:15,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-17 21:53:15,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-17 21:53:15,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-17 21:53:15,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-17 21:53:15,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-17 21:53:15,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-17 21:53:15,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-17 21:53:15,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-17 21:53:15,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-17 21:53:15,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-17 21:53:15,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-17 21:53:15,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-17 21:53:15,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-17 21:53:15,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-17 21:53:15,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-17 21:53:15,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-17 21:53:15,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-17 21:53:15,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-17 21:53:15,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-17 21:53:15,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-17 21:53:15,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-17 21:53:15,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-17 21:53:15,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-17 21:53:15,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-17 21:53:15,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-17 21:53:15,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-17 21:53:15,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-17 21:53:15,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-17 21:53:15,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-17 21:53:15,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-17 21:53:15,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-17 21:53:15,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-17 21:53:15,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-17 21:53:15,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-17 21:53:15,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-17 21:53:15,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-17 21:53:15,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-17 21:53:15,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-17 21:53:15,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-17 21:53:15,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-17 21:53:15,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-17 21:53:15,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-17 21:53:15,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-17 21:53:15,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-17 21:53:15,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-17 21:53:15,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-17 21:53:15,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-17 21:53:15,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-17 21:53:15,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-17 21:53:15,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-17 21:53:15,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-17 21:53:15,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-17 21:53:15,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-17 21:53:15,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-17 21:53:15,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-17 21:53:15,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-17 21:53:15,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-17 21:53:15,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-17 21:53:15,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-17 21:53:15,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-17 21:53:15,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-17 21:53:15,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-17 21:53:15,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-17 21:53:15,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-17 21:53:15,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-17 21:53:15,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-17 21:53:15,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-17 21:53:15,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-17 21:53:15,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-17 21:53:15,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-17 21:53:15,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-17 21:53:15,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-17 21:53:15,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-17 21:53:15,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-17 21:53:15,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-17 21:53:15,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:15,265 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:15,265 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table34
2023-07-17 21:53:15,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv871358531=369, srv64697211=312, srv653261481=314, srv1778141916=154, srv716510755=323, srv372169288=255, srv568235512=298, srv710229516=322, srv537137712=293, srv1682791519=131, srv642353994=311, srv1046656068=13, srv993792848=391, srv1202667070=39, srv99567927=392, srv1607947050=111, srv1677371877=129, srv1763526149=150, srv1763378353=149, srv531263272=289, srv448398842=270, srv802808934=348, srv77960001=340, srv453521623=271, srv162773041=114, srv563606057=295, srv1659238910=122, srv1279307656=55, srv1914255334=183, srv1296605582=61, srv2131597846=222, srv1375359355=72, srv1405269336=79, srv175680261=147, srv282211488=242, srv1412891098=82, srv375712549=257, srv191234370=182, srv1574132168=106, srv1853511149=168, srv617306884=307, srv268601623=238, srv1400099806=78, srv477381292=275, srv1279442050=56, srv535853198=292, srv1767480590=152, srv2100700333=211, srv1187847151=37, srv791064637=345, srv74478935=330, srv1206084762=41, srv1497856295=97, srv897884865=377, srv398014971=261, srv786136704=342, srv1429879791=86, srv1201763981=38, srv1415213844=84, srv302220908=243, srv156683359=105, srv1974497084=192, srv535358845=291, srv627763604=308, srv732106437=326, srv1679724304=130, srv576770232=299, srv478480013=276, srv1237250370=47, srv1169018295=34, srv32320833=248, srv594880186=304, srv216306370=225, srv656484240=315, srv818754908=354, srv1321058011=63, srv1256345927=52, srv1670847243=126, srv1515243164=99, srv1781378955=156, srv508388209=278, srv1910886192=180, srv1718898730=139, srv772274482=337, srv1433624807=87, srv848605385=359, srv2107957639=212, srv270591905=240, srv2126706298=219, srv2080681743=209, srv1683990934=132, srv11526364=28, srv761020484=334, srv1720507603=141, srv266276730=236, srv935213051=386, srv923440665=383, srv1911104834=181, srv1944131651=187, srv1162841146=30, srv1921230216=185, srv319459319=247, srv1168022226=33, srv57689659=300, srv716533901=324, srv1255156178=50, srv441379967=267, srv806979625=350, srv788255577=344, srv976533744=389, srv1317853355=62, srv1491073587=96, srv777865249=339, srv2130226580=221, srv873230355=370, srv971370780=388, srv2008207413=197, srv989150800=390, srv737980208=328, srv862088563=363, srv1716783669=138, srv1801293056=160, srv1363984373=68, srv515711115=282, srv1378945327=75, srv17002515=136, srv853498273=361, srv1825292480=165, srv2124576425=217, srv1889349340=175, srv527691188=286, srv1226737728=44, srv1781498156=157, srv104267960=11, srv1663644309=124, srv1672213768=127, srv740402944=329, srv555807163=294, srv566277037=296, srv734882045=327, srv1143683685=27, srv1021400966=5, srv694407347=319, srv1626790310=113, srv303328507=244, srv1869166689=171, srv781623755=341, srv40741117=264, srv1958265988=190, srv592380483=303, srv483565354=277, srv1531731329=100, srv359746409=253, srv1271131029=54, srv1007512250=2, srv1783696565=158, srv1284150263=57, srv1648846971=118, srv120365207=40, srv263085176=235, srv535080964=290, srv824739010=357, srv744793832=331, srv1073394883=18, srv1113186104=23, srv1370321362=69, srv328204461=249, srv1604342762=109, srv266460489=237, srv313806624=245, srv1473408823=93, srv865692144=366, srv42814401=265, srv104065318=10, srv1599236554=108, srv1476834435=94, srv1673452142=128, srv716892727=325, srv1501773847=98, srv791504502=346, srv367902453=254, srv254349567=232, srv2126102976=218, srv252714068=231, srv916506189=380, srv687320190=318, srv1000433998=0, srv51396503=281, srv648464134=313, srv908419423=379, srv204022732=200, srv1901650254=177, srv200342397=196, srv765841762=335, srv1849125656=167, srv235281774=226, srv2137298641=224, srv517347076=283, srv1687711069=135, srv800105834=347, srv1609917009=112, srv1038797815=9, srv863216619=365, srv921796978=382, srv895924009=376, srv319002955=246, srv611122413=305, srv1942590787=186, srv529333113=288, srv1053973741=14, srv1988512138=194, srv1037112526=8, srv442327402=268, srv2062351281=204, srv1240518778=48, srv471289019=274, srv1857090224=170, srv1543025253=101, srv1915241294=184, srv238420451=228, srv1747796150=145, srv1101668258=21, srv1437034663=88, srv1173449481=35, srv582652595=301, srv1739043021=144, srv1733173130=143, srv465824154=272, srv14463216=91, srv1720161153=140, srv1549403995=102, srv235920151=227, srv1909060246=179, srv527988350=287, srv1801762669=161, srv89501442=375, srv442994824=269, srv1414012241=83, srv165153258=121, srv1766333515=151, srv2063438865=205, srv1071671801=17, srv1638570398=116, srv1035353226=7, srv1856921753=169, srv1887444158=173, srv1897306674=176, srv1255718022=51, srv1260078897=53, srv1372945218=70, srv1163715139=31, srv175471358=146, srv1558656747=104, srv1463869996=92, srv124825865=49, srv1142495625=26, srv1397803774=77, srv1644508836=117, srv1807320536=162, srv1165273546=32, srv1650978005=120, srv1374260725=71, srv2065239646=206, srv1685737274=134, srv878340336=371, srv329463090=250, srv2112675912=213, srv1378293943=74, srv787532288=343, srv1292867420=59, srv519831391=285, srv1002018470=1, srv822141051=356, srv1229740495=45, srv706370370=321, srv255741565=233, srv1177018836=36, srv1223505925=43, srv745532463=332, srv1820836786=163, srv2127145828=220, srv2124524081=216, srv665150476=316, srv2132621880=223, srv2051928856=203, srv1903063797=178, srv881186303=373, srv1758974023=148, srv270549378=239, srv2014789268=198, srv1663469360=123, srv1331983035=65, srv1768940632=153, srv2084732799=210, srv1043044287=12, srv630246195=309, srv86319792=364, srv37305654=256, srv1650394019=119, srv1888093001=174, srv512441512=280, srv813969264=352, srv277288989=241, srv2017714321=199, srv1410469782=81, srv751917673=333, srv1443060804=89, srv1997063872=195, srv404426071=263, srv1443287861=90, srv695697141=320, srv636958174=310, srv1105584096=22, srv583005569=302, srv92523166=384, srv330226906=251, srv1684865692=133, srv381463497=258, srv567942525=297, srv1010403208=3, srv881516937=374, srv140693587=80, srv1872213858=172, srv262210172=234, srv846799674=358, srv851169364=360, srv880017865=372, srv129190288=58, srv401606217=262, srv669535820=317, srv1325384866=64, srv1377673856=73, srv1416276025=85, srv430431276=266, srv81513922=353, srv2044458062=201, srv2118166427=214, srv1665530216=125, srv2045587532=202, srv1824773168=164, srv2071913725=208, srv1295499145=60, srv1780304939=155, srv612277490=306, srv102508625=6, srv1637539828=115, srv820424989=355, srv50966795=279, srv1950402166=188, srv1207208580=42, srv1057648579=16, srv1084295726=20, srv39165764=260, srv959379519=387, srv2066402828=207, srv1556810592=103, srv1232731779=46, srv1606144164=110, srv1487275322=95, srv519310224=284, srv775221203=338, srv1079168923=19, srv1957834842=189, srv866525142=367, srv243907419=229, srv248553307=230, srv344122075=252, srv467461515=273, srv805609280=349, srv1018507425=4, srv1827511993=166, srv1704639485=137, srv855754935=362, srv1057024901=15, srv1116429721=24, srv927375731=385, srv1383836323=76, srv1584407048=107, srv809779157=351, srv1786622589=159, srv869541705=368, srv1123072042=25, srv1726136626=142, srv135800579=67, srv1958676591=191, srv390748718=259, srv907223095=378, srv76871917=336, srv1160170031=29, srv2119727728=215, srv918100507=381, srv1352063642=66, srv1975716907=193} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:15,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:15,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:15,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:15,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:15,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:15,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:15,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:15,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:15,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:15,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:15,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-17 21:53:15,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-17 21:53:15,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-17 21:53:15,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-17 21:53:15,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-17 21:53:15,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-17 21:53:15,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-17 21:53:15,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-17 21:53:15,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-17 21:53:15,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-17 21:53:15,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-17 21:53:15,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-17 21:53:15,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-17 21:53:15,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-17 21:53:15,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-17 21:53:15,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-17 21:53:15,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-17 21:53:15,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-17 21:53:15,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-17 21:53:15,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-17 21:53:15,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-17 21:53:15,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-17 21:53:15,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-17 21:53:15,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-17 21:53:15,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-17 21:53:15,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-17 21:53:15,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-17 21:53:15,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-17 21:53:15,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-17 21:53:15,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-17 21:53:15,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-17 21:53:15,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-17 21:53:15,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-17 21:53:15,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-17 21:53:15,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-17 21:53:15,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-17 21:53:15,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-17 21:53:15,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-17 21:53:15,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-17 21:53:15,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-17 21:53:15,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-17 21:53:15,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-17 21:53:15,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-17 21:53:15,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-17 21:53:15,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-17 21:53:15,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-17 21:53:15,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-17 21:53:15,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-17 21:53:15,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-17 21:53:15,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-17 21:53:15,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-17 21:53:15,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-17 21:53:15,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-17 21:53:15,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-17 21:53:15,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-17 21:53:15,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-17 21:53:15,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-17 21:53:15,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-17 21:53:15,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-17 21:53:15,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-17 21:53:15,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-17 21:53:15,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-17 21:53:15,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-17 21:53:15,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-17 21:53:15,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-17 21:53:15,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-17 21:53:15,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-17 21:53:15,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-17 21:53:15,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-17 21:53:15,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-17 21:53:15,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-17 21:53:15,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-17 21:53:15,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-17 21:53:15,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-17 21:53:15,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-17 21:53:15,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-17 21:53:15,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-17 21:53:15,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-17 21:53:15,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-17 21:53:15,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-17 21:53:15,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-17 21:53:15,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-17 21:53:15,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-17 21:53:15,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-17 21:53:15,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-17 21:53:15,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-17 21:53:15,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-17 21:53:15,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-17 21:53:15,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-17 21:53:15,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-17 21:53:15,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-17 21:53:15,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-17 21:53:15,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-17 21:53:15,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-17 21:53:15,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-17 21:53:15,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-17 21:53:15,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-17 21:53:15,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-17 21:53:15,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-17 21:53:15,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-17 21:53:15,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-17 21:53:15,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-17 21:53:15,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-17 21:53:15,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-17 21:53:15,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-17 21:53:15,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-17 21:53:15,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-17 21:53:15,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-17 21:53:15,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-17 21:53:15,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-17 21:53:15,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-17 21:53:15,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-17 21:53:15,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-17 21:53:15,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-17 21:53:15,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-17 21:53:15,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-17 21:53:15,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-17 21:53:15,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-17 21:53:15,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-17 21:53:15,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-17 21:53:15,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-17 21:53:15,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-17 21:53:15,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-17 21:53:15,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-17 21:53:15,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-17 21:53:15,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-17 21:53:15,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-17 21:53:15,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-17 21:53:15,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-17 21:53:15,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-17 21:53:15,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-17 21:53:15,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-17 21:53:15,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-17 21:53:15,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-17 21:53:15,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-17 21:53:15,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-17 21:53:15,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-17 21:53:15,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-17 21:53:15,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-17 21:53:15,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-17 21:53:15,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-17 21:53:15,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-17 21:53:15,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-17 21:53:15,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-17 21:53:15,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-17 21:53:15,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-17 21:53:15,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-17 21:53:15,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-17 21:53:15,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-17 21:53:15,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-17 21:53:15,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-17 21:53:15,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-17 21:53:15,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-17 21:53:15,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-17 21:53:15,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-17 21:53:15,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-17 21:53:15,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-17 21:53:15,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-17 21:53:15,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-17 21:53:15,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-17 21:53:15,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-17 21:53:15,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-17 21:53:15,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-17 21:53:15,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-17 21:53:15,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-17 21:53:15,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-17 21:53:15,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-17 21:53:15,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-17 21:53:15,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-17 21:53:15,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-17 21:53:15,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-17 21:53:15,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-17 21:53:15,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-17 21:53:15,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-17 21:53:15,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-17 21:53:15,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-17 21:53:15,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-17 21:53:15,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-17 21:53:15,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-17 21:53:15,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-17 21:53:15,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-17 21:53:15,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-17 21:53:15,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-17 21:53:15,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-17 21:53:15,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-17 21:53:15,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-17 21:53:15,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-17 21:53:15,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-17 21:53:15,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-17 21:53:15,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-17 21:53:15,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-17 21:53:15,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-17 21:53:15,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-17 21:53:15,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-17 21:53:15,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-17 21:53:15,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-17 21:53:15,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-17 21:53:15,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-17 21:53:15,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-17 21:53:15,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-17 21:53:15,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-17 21:53:15,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-17 21:53:15,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-17 21:53:15,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-17 21:53:15,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-17 21:53:15,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-17 21:53:15,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-17 21:53:15,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-17 21:53:15,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-17 21:53:15,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-17 21:53:15,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-17 21:53:15,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-17 21:53:15,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-17 21:53:15,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-17 21:53:15,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-17 21:53:15,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-17 21:53:15,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-17 21:53:15,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-17 21:53:15,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-17 21:53:15,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-17 21:53:15,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-17 21:53:15,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-17 21:53:15,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-17 21:53:15,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-17 21:53:15,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-17 21:53:15,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-17 21:53:15,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-17 21:53:15,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-17 21:53:15,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-17 21:53:15,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-17 21:53:15,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-17 21:53:15,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-17 21:53:15,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-17 21:53:15,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-17 21:53:15,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-17 21:53:15,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-17 21:53:15,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-17 21:53:15,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-17 21:53:15,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-17 21:53:15,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-17 21:53:15,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-17 21:53:15,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-17 21:53:15,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-17 21:53:15,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-17 21:53:15,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-17 21:53:15,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-17 21:53:15,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-17 21:53:15,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-17 21:53:15,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-17 21:53:15,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-17 21:53:15,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-17 21:53:15,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-17 21:53:15,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-17 21:53:15,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-17 21:53:15,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-17 21:53:15,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-17 21:53:15,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-17 21:53:15,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-17 21:53:15,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-17 21:53:15,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-17 21:53:15,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-17 21:53:15,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-17 21:53:15,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-17 21:53:15,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-17 21:53:15,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-17 21:53:15,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-17 21:53:15,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-17 21:53:15,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-17 21:53:15,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-17 21:53:15,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-17 21:53:15,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-17 21:53:15,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-17 21:53:15,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-17 21:53:15,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-17 21:53:15,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-17 21:53:15,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-17 21:53:15,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-17 21:53:15,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-17 21:53:15,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-17 21:53:15,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-17 21:53:15,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-17 21:53:15,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-17 21:53:15,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-17 21:53:15,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-17 21:53:15,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-17 21:53:15,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-17 21:53:15,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-17 21:53:15,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-17 21:53:15,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-17 21:53:15,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-17 21:53:15,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-17 21:53:15,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-17 21:53:15,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-17 21:53:15,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-17 21:53:15,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-17 21:53:15,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-17 21:53:15,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-17 21:53:15,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-17 21:53:15,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-17 21:53:15,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-17 21:53:15,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-17 21:53:15,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-17 21:53:15,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-17 21:53:15,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-17 21:53:15,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-17 21:53:15,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-17 21:53:15,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-17 21:53:15,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-17 21:53:15,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-17 21:53:15,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-17 21:53:15,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-17 21:53:15,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-17 21:53:15,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-17 21:53:15,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-17 21:53:15,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-17 21:53:15,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-17 21:53:15,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-17 21:53:15,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-17 21:53:15,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-17 21:53:15,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-17 21:53:15,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-17 21:53:15,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-17 21:53:15,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-17 21:53:15,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-17 21:53:15,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-17 21:53:15,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-17 21:53:15,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-17 21:53:15,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-17 21:53:15,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-17 21:53:15,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-17 21:53:15,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-17 21:53:15,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-17 21:53:15,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-17 21:53:15,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-17 21:53:15,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-17 21:53:15,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-17 21:53:15,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-17 21:53:15,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-17 21:53:15,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-17 21:53:15,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-17 21:53:15,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-17 21:53:15,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-17 21:53:15,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-17 21:53:15,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-17 21:53:15,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-17 21:53:15,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-17 21:53:15,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-17 21:53:15,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-17 21:53:15,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-17 21:53:15,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-17 21:53:15,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-17 21:53:15,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-17 21:53:15,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-17 21:53:15,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-17 21:53:15,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-17 21:53:15,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-17 21:53:15,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-17 21:53:15,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-17 21:53:15,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-17 21:53:15,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-17 21:53:15,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-17 21:53:15,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-17 21:53:15,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-17 21:53:15,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-17 21:53:15,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-17 21:53:15,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-17 21:53:15,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-17 21:53:15,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-17 21:53:15,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-17 21:53:15,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-17 21:53:15,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-17 21:53:15,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-17 21:53:15,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-17 21:53:15,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-17 21:53:15,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-17 21:53:15,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-17 21:53:15,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-17 21:53:15,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-17 21:53:15,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-17 21:53:15,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-17 21:53:15,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-17 21:53:15,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-17 21:53:15,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-17 21:53:15,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:15,280 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table34) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:15,280 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table24
2023-07-17 21:53:15,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv871358531=369, srv64697211=312, srv653261481=314, srv1778141916=154, srv716510755=323, srv372169288=255, srv568235512=298, srv710229516=322, srv537137712=293, srv1682791519=131, srv642353994=311, srv1046656068=13, srv993792848=391, srv1202667070=39, srv99567927=392, srv1607947050=111, srv1677371877=129, srv1763526149=150, srv1763378353=149, srv531263272=289, srv448398842=270, srv802808934=348, srv77960001=340, srv453521623=271, srv162773041=114, srv563606057=295, srv1659238910=122, srv1279307656=55, srv1914255334=183, srv1296605582=61, srv2131597846=222, srv1375359355=72, srv1405269336=79, srv175680261=147, srv282211488=242, srv1412891098=82, srv375712549=257, srv191234370=182, srv1574132168=106, srv1853511149=168, srv617306884=307, srv268601623=238, srv1400099806=78, srv477381292=275, srv1279442050=56, srv535853198=292, srv1767480590=152, srv2100700333=211, srv1187847151=37, srv791064637=345, srv74478935=330, srv1206084762=41, srv1497856295=97, srv897884865=377, srv398014971=261, srv786136704=342, srv1429879791=86, srv1201763981=38, srv1415213844=84, srv302220908=243, srv156683359=105, srv1974497084=192, srv535358845=291, srv627763604=308, srv732106437=326, srv1679724304=130, srv576770232=299, srv478480013=276, srv1237250370=47, srv1169018295=34, srv32320833=248, srv594880186=304, srv216306370=225, srv656484240=315, srv818754908=354, srv1321058011=63, srv1256345927=52, srv1670847243=126, srv1515243164=99, srv1781378955=156, srv508388209=278, srv1910886192=180, srv1718898730=139, srv772274482=337, srv1433624807=87, srv848605385=359, srv2107957639=212, srv270591905=240, srv2126706298=219, srv2080681743=209, srv1683990934=132, srv11526364=28, srv761020484=334, srv1720507603=141, srv266276730=236, srv935213051=386, srv923440665=383, srv1911104834=181, srv1944131651=187, srv1162841146=30, srv1921230216=185, srv319459319=247, srv1168022226=33, srv57689659=300, srv716533901=324, srv1255156178=50, srv441379967=267, srv806979625=350, srv788255577=344, srv976533744=389, srv1317853355=62, srv1491073587=96, srv777865249=339, srv2130226580=221, srv873230355=370, srv971370780=388, srv2008207413=197, srv989150800=390, srv737980208=328, srv862088563=363, srv1716783669=138, srv1801293056=160, srv1363984373=68, srv515711115=282, srv1378945327=75, srv17002515=136, srv853498273=361, srv1825292480=165, srv2124576425=217, srv1889349340=175, srv527691188=286, srv1226737728=44, srv1781498156=157, srv104267960=11, srv1663644309=124, srv1672213768=127, srv740402944=329, srv555807163=294, srv566277037=296, srv734882045=327, srv1143683685=27, srv1021400966=5, srv694407347=319, srv1626790310=113, srv303328507=244, srv1869166689=171, srv781623755=341, srv40741117=264, srv1958265988=190, srv592380483=303, srv483565354=277, srv1531731329=100, srv359746409=253, srv1271131029=54, srv1007512250=2, srv1783696565=158, srv1284150263=57, srv1648846971=118, srv120365207=40, srv263085176=235, srv535080964=290, srv824739010=357, srv744793832=331, srv1073394883=18, srv1113186104=23, srv1370321362=69, srv328204461=249, srv1604342762=109, srv266460489=237, srv313806624=245, srv1473408823=93, srv865692144=366, srv42814401=265, srv104065318=10, srv1599236554=108, srv1476834435=94, srv1673452142=128, srv716892727=325, srv1501773847=98, srv791504502=346, srv367902453=254, srv254349567=232, srv2126102976=218, srv252714068=231, srv916506189=380, srv687320190=318, srv1000433998=0, srv51396503=281, srv648464134=313, srv908419423=379, srv204022732=200, srv1901650254=177, srv200342397=196, srv765841762=335, srv1849125656=167, srv235281774=226, srv2137298641=224, srv517347076=283, srv1687711069=135, srv800105834=347, srv1609917009=112, srv1038797815=9, srv863216619=365, srv921796978=382, srv895924009=376, srv319002955=246, srv611122413=305, srv1942590787=186, srv529333113=288, srv1053973741=14, srv1988512138=194, srv1037112526=8, srv442327402=268, srv2062351281=204, srv1240518778=48, srv471289019=274, srv1857090224=170, srv1543025253=101, srv1915241294=184, srv238420451=228, srv1747796150=145, srv1101668258=21, srv1437034663=88, srv1173449481=35, srv582652595=301, srv1739043021=144, srv1733173130=143, srv465824154=272, srv14463216=91, srv1720161153=140, srv1549403995=102, srv235920151=227, srv1909060246=179, srv527988350=287, srv1801762669=161, srv89501442=375, srv442994824=269, srv1414012241=83, srv165153258=121, srv1766333515=151, srv2063438865=205, srv1071671801=17, srv1638570398=116, srv1035353226=7, srv1856921753=169, srv1887444158=173, srv1897306674=176, srv1255718022=51, srv1260078897=53, srv1372945218=70, srv1163715139=31, srv175471358=146, srv1558656747=104, srv1463869996=92, srv124825865=49, srv1142495625=26, srv1397803774=77, srv1644508836=117, srv1807320536=162, srv1165273546=32, srv1650978005=120, srv1374260725=71, srv2065239646=206, srv1685737274=134, srv878340336=371, srv329463090=250, srv2112675912=213, srv1378293943=74, srv787532288=343, srv1292867420=59, srv519831391=285, srv1002018470=1, srv822141051=356, srv1229740495=45, srv706370370=321, srv255741565=233, srv1177018836=36, srv1223505925=43, srv745532463=332, srv1820836786=163, srv2127145828=220, srv2124524081=216, srv665150476=316, srv2132621880=223, srv2051928856=203, srv1903063797=178, srv881186303=373, srv1758974023=148, srv270549378=239, srv2014789268=198, srv1663469360=123, srv1331983035=65, srv1768940632=153, srv2084732799=210, srv1043044287=12, srv630246195=309, srv86319792=364, srv37305654=256, srv1650394019=119, srv1888093001=174, srv512441512=280, srv813969264=352, srv277288989=241, srv2017714321=199, srv1410469782=81, srv751917673=333, srv1443060804=89, srv1997063872=195, srv404426071=263, srv1443287861=90, srv695697141=320, srv636958174=310, srv1105584096=22, srv583005569=302, srv92523166=384, srv330226906=251, srv1684865692=133, srv381463497=258, srv567942525=297, srv1010403208=3, srv881516937=374, srv140693587=80, srv1872213858=172, srv262210172=234, srv846799674=358, srv851169364=360, srv880017865=372, srv129190288=58, srv401606217=262, srv669535820=317, srv1325384866=64, srv1377673856=73, srv1416276025=85, srv430431276=266, srv81513922=353, srv2044458062=201, srv2118166427=214, srv1665530216=125, srv2045587532=202, srv1824773168=164, srv2071913725=208, srv1295499145=60, srv1780304939=155, srv612277490=306, srv102508625=6, srv1637539828=115, srv820424989=355, srv50966795=279, srv1950402166=188, srv1207208580=42, srv1057648579=16, srv1084295726=20, srv39165764=260, srv959379519=387, srv2066402828=207, srv1556810592=103, srv1232731779=46, srv1606144164=110, srv1487275322=95, srv519310224=284, srv775221203=338, srv1079168923=19, srv1957834842=189, srv866525142=367, srv243907419=229, srv248553307=230, srv344122075=252, srv467461515=273, srv805609280=349, srv1018507425=4, srv1827511993=166, srv1704639485=137, srv855754935=362, srv1057024901=15, srv1116429721=24, srv927375731=385, srv1383836323=76, srv1584407048=107, srv809779157=351, srv1786622589=159, srv869541705=368, srv1123072042=25, srv1726136626=142, srv135800579=67, srv1958676591=191, srv390748718=259, srv907223095=378, srv76871917=336, srv1160170031=29, srv2119727728=215, srv918100507=381, srv1352063642=66, srv1975716907=193} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:15,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:15,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:15,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:15,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:15,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:15,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:15,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:15,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:15,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:15,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:15,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-17 21:53:15,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-17 21:53:15,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-17 21:53:15,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-17 21:53:15,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-17 21:53:15,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-17 21:53:15,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-17 21:53:15,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-17 21:53:15,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-17 21:53:15,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-17 21:53:15,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-17 21:53:15,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-17 21:53:15,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-17 21:53:15,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-17 21:53:15,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-17 21:53:15,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-17 21:53:15,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-17 21:53:15,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-17 21:53:15,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-17 21:53:15,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-17 21:53:15,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-17 21:53:15,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-17 21:53:15,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-17 21:53:15,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-17 21:53:15,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-17 21:53:15,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-17 21:53:15,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-17 21:53:15,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-17 21:53:15,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-17 21:53:15,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-17 21:53:15,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-17 21:53:15,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-17 21:53:15,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-17 21:53:15,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-17 21:53:15,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-17 21:53:15,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-17 21:53:15,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-17 21:53:15,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-17 21:53:15,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-17 21:53:15,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-17 21:53:15,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-17 21:53:15,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-17 21:53:15,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-17 21:53:15,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-17 21:53:15,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-17 21:53:15,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-17 21:53:15,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-17 21:53:15,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-17 21:53:15,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-17 21:53:15,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-17 21:53:15,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-17 21:53:15,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-17 21:53:15,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-17 21:53:15,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-17 21:53:15,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-17 21:53:15,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-17 21:53:15,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-17 21:53:15,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-17 21:53:15,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-17 21:53:15,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-17 21:53:15,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-17 21:53:15,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-17 21:53:15,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-17 21:53:15,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-17 21:53:15,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-17 21:53:15,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-17 21:53:15,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-17 21:53:15,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-17 21:53:15,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-17 21:53:15,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-17 21:53:15,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-17 21:53:15,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-17 21:53:15,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-17 21:53:15,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-17 21:53:15,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-17 21:53:15,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-17 21:53:15,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-17 21:53:15,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-17 21:53:15,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-17 21:53:15,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-17 21:53:15,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-17 21:53:15,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-17 21:53:15,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-17 21:53:15,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-17 21:53:15,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-17 21:53:15,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-17 21:53:15,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-17 21:53:15,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-17 21:53:15,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-17 21:53:15,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-17 21:53:15,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-17 21:53:15,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-17 21:53:15,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-17 21:53:15,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-17 21:53:15,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-17 21:53:15,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-17 21:53:15,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-17 21:53:15,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-17 21:53:15,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-17 21:53:15,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-17 21:53:15,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-17 21:53:15,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-17 21:53:15,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-17 21:53:15,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-17 21:53:15,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-17 21:53:15,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-17 21:53:15,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-17 21:53:15,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-17 21:53:15,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-17 21:53:15,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-17 21:53:15,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-17 21:53:15,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-17 21:53:15,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-17 21:53:15,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-17 21:53:15,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-17 21:53:15,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-17 21:53:15,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-17 21:53:15,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-17 21:53:15,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-17 21:53:15,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-17 21:53:15,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-17 21:53:15,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-17 21:53:15,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-17 21:53:15,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-17 21:53:15,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-17 21:53:15,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-17 21:53:15,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-17 21:53:15,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-17 21:53:15,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-17 21:53:15,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-17 21:53:15,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-17 21:53:15,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-17 21:53:15,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-17 21:53:15,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-17 21:53:15,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-17 21:53:15,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-17 21:53:15,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-17 21:53:15,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-17 21:53:15,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-17 21:53:15,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-17 21:53:15,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-17 21:53:15,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-17 21:53:15,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-17 21:53:15,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-17 21:53:15,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-17 21:53:15,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-17 21:53:15,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-17 21:53:15,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-17 21:53:15,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-17 21:53:15,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-17 21:53:15,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-17 21:53:15,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-17 21:53:15,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-17 21:53:15,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-17 21:53:15,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-17 21:53:15,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-17 21:53:15,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-17 21:53:15,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-17 21:53:15,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-17 21:53:15,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-17 21:53:15,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-17 21:53:15,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-17 21:53:15,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-17 21:53:15,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-17 21:53:15,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-17 21:53:15,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-17 21:53:15,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-17 21:53:15,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-17 21:53:15,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-17 21:53:15,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-17 21:53:15,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-17 21:53:15,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-17 21:53:15,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-17 21:53:15,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-17 21:53:15,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-17 21:53:15,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-17 21:53:15,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-17 21:53:15,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-17 21:53:15,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-17 21:53:15,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-17 21:53:15,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-17 21:53:15,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-17 21:53:15,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-17 21:53:15,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-17 21:53:15,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-17 21:53:15,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-17 21:53:15,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-17 21:53:15,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-17 21:53:15,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-17 21:53:15,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-17 21:53:15,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-17 21:53:15,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-17 21:53:15,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-17 21:53:15,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-17 21:53:15,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-17 21:53:15,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-17 21:53:15,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-17 21:53:15,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-17 21:53:15,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-17 21:53:15,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-17 21:53:15,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-17 21:53:15,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-17 21:53:15,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-17 21:53:15,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-17 21:53:15,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-17 21:53:15,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-17 21:53:15,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-17 21:53:15,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-17 21:53:15,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-17 21:53:15,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-17 21:53:15,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-17 21:53:15,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-17 21:53:15,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-17 21:53:15,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-17 21:53:15,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-17 21:53:15,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-17 21:53:15,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-17 21:53:15,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-17 21:53:15,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-17 21:53:15,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-17 21:53:15,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-17 21:53:15,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-17 21:53:15,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-17 21:53:15,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-17 21:53:15,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-17 21:53:15,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-17 21:53:15,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-17 21:53:15,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-17 21:53:15,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-17 21:53:15,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-17 21:53:15,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-17 21:53:15,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-17 21:53:15,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-17 21:53:15,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-17 21:53:15,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-17 21:53:15,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-17 21:53:15,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-17 21:53:15,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-17 21:53:15,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-17 21:53:15,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-17 21:53:15,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-17 21:53:15,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-17 21:53:15,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-17 21:53:15,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-17 21:53:15,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-17 21:53:15,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-17 21:53:15,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-17 21:53:15,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-17 21:53:15,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-17 21:53:15,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-17 21:53:15,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-17 21:53:15,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-17 21:53:15,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-17 21:53:15,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-17 21:53:15,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-17 21:53:15,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-17 21:53:15,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-17 21:53:15,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-17 21:53:15,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-17 21:53:15,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-17 21:53:15,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-17 21:53:15,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-17 21:53:15,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-17 21:53:15,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-17 21:53:15,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-17 21:53:15,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-17 21:53:15,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-17 21:53:15,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-17 21:53:15,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-17 21:53:15,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-17 21:53:15,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-17 21:53:15,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-17 21:53:15,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-17 21:53:15,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-17 21:53:15,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-17 21:53:15,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-17 21:53:15,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-17 21:53:15,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-17 21:53:15,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-17 21:53:15,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-17 21:53:15,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-17 21:53:15,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-17 21:53:15,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-17 21:53:15,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-17 21:53:15,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-17 21:53:15,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-17 21:53:15,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-17 21:53:15,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-17 21:53:15,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-17 21:53:15,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-17 21:53:15,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-17 21:53:15,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-17 21:53:15,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-17 21:53:15,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-17 21:53:15,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-17 21:53:15,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-17 21:53:15,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-17 21:53:15,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-17 21:53:15,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-17 21:53:15,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-17 21:53:15,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-17 21:53:15,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-17 21:53:15,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-17 21:53:15,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-17 21:53:15,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-17 21:53:15,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-17 21:53:15,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-17 21:53:15,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-17 21:53:15,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-17 21:53:15,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-17 21:53:15,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-17 21:53:15,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-17 21:53:15,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-17 21:53:15,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-17 21:53:15,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-17 21:53:15,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-17 21:53:15,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-17 21:53:15,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-17 21:53:15,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-17 21:53:15,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-17 21:53:15,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-17 21:53:15,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-17 21:53:15,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-17 21:53:15,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-17 21:53:15,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-17 21:53:15,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-17 21:53:15,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-17 21:53:15,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-17 21:53:15,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-17 21:53:15,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-17 21:53:15,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-17 21:53:15,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-17 21:53:15,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-17 21:53:15,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-17 21:53:15,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-17 21:53:15,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-17 21:53:15,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-17 21:53:15,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-17 21:53:15,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-17 21:53:15,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-17 21:53:15,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-17 21:53:15,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-17 21:53:15,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-17 21:53:15,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-17 21:53:15,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-17 21:53:15,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-17 21:53:15,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-17 21:53:15,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-17 21:53:15,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-17 21:53:15,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-17 21:53:15,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-17 21:53:15,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-17 21:53:15,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-17 21:53:15,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-17 21:53:15,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-17 21:53:15,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-17 21:53:15,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-17 21:53:15,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-17 21:53:15,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-17 21:53:15,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-17 21:53:15,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-17 21:53:15,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-17 21:53:15,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-17 21:53:15,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-17 21:53:15,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-17 21:53:15,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-17 21:53:15,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-17 21:53:15,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-17 21:53:15,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-17 21:53:15,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-17 21:53:15,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-17 21:53:15,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-17 21:53:15,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-17 21:53:15,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-17 21:53:15,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-17 21:53:15,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-17 21:53:15,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-17 21:53:15,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-17 21:53:15,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-17 21:53:15,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-17 21:53:15,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-17 21:53:15,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-17 21:53:15,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-17 21:53:15,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:15,295 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table24) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:15,295 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table25
2023-07-17 21:53:15,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv871358531=369, srv64697211=312, srv653261481=314, srv1778141916=154, srv716510755=323, srv372169288=255, srv568235512=298, srv710229516=322, srv537137712=293, srv1682791519=131, srv642353994=311, srv1046656068=13, srv993792848=391, srv1202667070=39, srv99567927=392, srv1607947050=111, srv1677371877=129, srv1763526149=150, srv1763378353=149, srv531263272=289, srv448398842=270, srv802808934=348, srv77960001=340, srv453521623=271, srv162773041=114, srv563606057=295, srv1659238910=122, srv1279307656=55, srv1914255334=183, srv1296605582=61, srv2131597846=222, srv1375359355=72, srv1405269336=79, srv175680261=147, srv282211488=242, srv1412891098=82, srv375712549=257, srv191234370=182, srv1574132168=106, srv1853511149=168, srv617306884=307, srv268601623=238, srv1400099806=78, srv477381292=275, srv1279442050=56, srv535853198=292, srv1767480590=152, srv2100700333=211, srv1187847151=37, srv791064637=345, srv74478935=330, srv1206084762=41, srv1497856295=97, srv897884865=377, srv398014971=261, srv786136704=342, srv1429879791=86, srv1201763981=38, srv1415213844=84, srv302220908=243, srv156683359=105, srv1974497084=192, srv535358845=291, srv627763604=308, srv732106437=326, srv1679724304=130, srv576770232=299, srv478480013=276, srv1237250370=47, srv1169018295=34, srv32320833=248, srv594880186=304, srv216306370=225, srv656484240=315, srv818754908=354, srv1321058011=63, srv1256345927=52, srv1670847243=126, srv1515243164=99, srv1781378955=156, srv508388209=278, srv1910886192=180, srv1718898730=139, srv772274482=337, srv1433624807=87, srv848605385=359, srv2107957639=212, srv270591905=240, srv2126706298=219, srv2080681743=209, srv1683990934=132, srv11526364=28, srv761020484=334, srv1720507603=141, srv266276730=236, srv935213051=386, srv923440665=383, srv1911104834=181, srv1944131651=187, srv1162841146=30, srv1921230216=185, srv319459319=247, srv1168022226=33, srv57689659=300, srv716533901=324, srv1255156178=50, srv441379967=267, srv806979625=350, srv788255577=344, srv976533744=389, srv1317853355=62, srv1491073587=96, srv777865249=339, srv2130226580=221, srv873230355=370, srv971370780=388, srv2008207413=197, srv989150800=390, srv737980208=328, srv862088563=363, srv1716783669=138, srv1801293056=160, srv1363984373=68, srv515711115=282, srv1378945327=75, srv17002515=136, srv853498273=361, srv1825292480=165, srv2124576425=217, srv1889349340=175, srv527691188=286, srv1226737728=44, srv1781498156=157, srv104267960=11, srv1663644309=124, srv1672213768=127, srv740402944=329, srv555807163=294, srv566277037=296, srv734882045=327, srv1143683685=27, srv1021400966=5, srv694407347=319, srv1626790310=113, srv303328507=244, srv1869166689=171, srv781623755=341, srv40741117=264, srv1958265988=190, srv592380483=303, srv483565354=277, srv1531731329=100, srv359746409=253, srv1271131029=54, srv1007512250=2, srv1783696565=158, srv1284150263=57, srv1648846971=118, srv120365207=40, srv263085176=235, srv535080964=290, srv824739010=357, srv744793832=331, srv1073394883=18, srv1113186104=23, srv1370321362=69, srv328204461=249, srv1604342762=109, srv266460489=237, srv313806624=245, srv1473408823=93, srv865692144=366, srv42814401=265, srv104065318=10, srv1599236554=108, srv1476834435=94, srv1673452142=128, srv716892727=325, srv1501773847=98, srv791504502=346, srv367902453=254, srv254349567=232, srv2126102976=218, srv252714068=231, srv916506189=380, srv687320190=318, srv1000433998=0, srv51396503=281, srv648464134=313, srv908419423=379, srv204022732=200, srv1901650254=177, srv200342397=196, srv765841762=335, srv1849125656=167, srv235281774=226, srv2137298641=224, srv517347076=283, srv1687711069=135, srv800105834=347, srv1609917009=112, srv1038797815=9, srv863216619=365, srv921796978=382, srv895924009=376, srv319002955=246, srv611122413=305, srv1942590787=186, srv529333113=288, srv1053973741=14, srv1988512138=194, srv1037112526=8, srv442327402=268, srv2062351281=204, srv1240518778=48, srv471289019=274, srv1857090224=170, srv1543025253=101, srv1915241294=184, srv238420451=228, srv1747796150=145, srv1101668258=21, srv1437034663=88, srv1173449481=35, srv582652595=301, srv1739043021=144, srv1733173130=143, srv465824154=272, srv14463216=91, srv1720161153=140, srv1549403995=102, srv235920151=227, srv1909060246=179, srv527988350=287, srv1801762669=161, srv89501442=375, srv442994824=269, srv1414012241=83, srv165153258=121, srv1766333515=151, srv2063438865=205, srv1071671801=17, srv1638570398=116, srv1035353226=7, srv1856921753=169, srv1887444158=173, srv1897306674=176, srv1255718022=51, srv1260078897=53, srv1372945218=70, srv1163715139=31, srv175471358=146, srv1558656747=104, srv1463869996=92, srv124825865=49, srv1142495625=26, srv1397803774=77, srv1644508836=117, srv1807320536=162, srv1165273546=32, srv1650978005=120, srv1374260725=71, srv2065239646=206, srv1685737274=134, srv878340336=371, srv329463090=250, srv2112675912=213, srv1378293943=74, srv787532288=343, srv1292867420=59, srv519831391=285, srv1002018470=1, srv822141051=356, srv1229740495=45, srv706370370=321, srv255741565=233, srv1177018836=36, srv1223505925=43, srv745532463=332, srv1820836786=163, srv2127145828=220, srv2124524081=216, srv665150476=316, srv2132621880=223, srv2051928856=203, srv1903063797=178, srv881186303=373, srv1758974023=148, srv270549378=239, srv2014789268=198, srv1663469360=123, srv1331983035=65, srv1768940632=153, srv2084732799=210, srv1043044287=12, srv630246195=309, srv86319792=364, srv37305654=256, srv1650394019=119, srv1888093001=174, srv512441512=280, srv813969264=352, srv277288989=241, srv2017714321=199, srv1410469782=81, srv751917673=333, srv1443060804=89, srv1997063872=195, srv404426071=263, srv1443287861=90, srv695697141=320, srv636958174=310, srv1105584096=22, srv583005569=302, srv92523166=384, srv330226906=251, srv1684865692=133, srv381463497=258, srv567942525=297, srv1010403208=3, srv881516937=374, srv140693587=80, srv1872213858=172, srv262210172=234, srv846799674=358, srv851169364=360, srv880017865=372, srv129190288=58, srv401606217=262, srv669535820=317, srv1325384866=64, srv1377673856=73, srv1416276025=85, srv430431276=266, srv81513922=353, srv2044458062=201, srv2118166427=214, srv1665530216=125, srv2045587532=202, srv1824773168=164, srv2071913725=208, srv1295499145=60, srv1780304939=155, srv612277490=306, srv102508625=6, srv1637539828=115, srv820424989=355, srv50966795=279, srv1950402166=188, srv1207208580=42, srv1057648579=16, srv1084295726=20, srv39165764=260, srv959379519=387, srv2066402828=207, srv1556810592=103, srv1232731779=46, srv1606144164=110, srv1487275322=95, srv519310224=284, srv775221203=338, srv1079168923=19, srv1957834842=189, srv866525142=367, srv243907419=229, srv248553307=230, srv344122075=252, srv467461515=273, srv805609280=349, srv1018507425=4, srv1827511993=166, srv1704639485=137, srv855754935=362, srv1057024901=15, srv1116429721=24, srv927375731=385, srv1383836323=76, srv1584407048=107, srv809779157=351, srv1786622589=159, srv869541705=368, srv1123072042=25, srv1726136626=142, srv135800579=67, srv1958676591=191, srv390748718=259, srv907223095=378, srv76871917=336, srv1160170031=29, srv2119727728=215, srv918100507=381, srv1352063642=66, srv1975716907=193} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:15,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:15,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:15,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:15,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:15,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:15,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:15,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:15,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:15,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:15,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:15,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-17 21:53:15,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-17 21:53:15,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-17 21:53:15,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-17 21:53:15,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-17 21:53:15,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-17 21:53:15,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-17 21:53:15,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-17 21:53:15,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-17 21:53:15,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-17 21:53:15,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-17 21:53:15,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-17 21:53:15,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-17 21:53:15,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-17 21:53:15,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-17 21:53:15,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-17 21:53:15,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-17 21:53:15,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-17 21:53:15,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-17 21:53:15,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-17 21:53:15,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-17 21:53:15,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-17 21:53:15,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-17 21:53:15,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-17 21:53:15,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-17 21:53:15,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-17 21:53:15,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-17 21:53:15,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-17 21:53:15,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-17 21:53:15,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-17 21:53:15,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-17 21:53:15,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-17 21:53:15,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-17 21:53:15,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-17 21:53:15,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-17 21:53:15,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-17 21:53:15,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-17 21:53:15,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-17 21:53:15,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-17 21:53:15,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-17 21:53:15,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-17 21:53:15,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-17 21:53:15,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-17 21:53:15,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-17 21:53:15,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-17 21:53:15,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-17 21:53:15,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-17 21:53:15,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-17 21:53:15,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-17 21:53:15,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-17 21:53:15,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-17 21:53:15,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-17 21:53:15,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-17 21:53:15,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-17 21:53:15,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-17 21:53:15,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-17 21:53:15,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-17 21:53:15,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-17 21:53:15,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-17 21:53:15,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-17 21:53:15,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-17 21:53:15,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-17 21:53:15,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-17 21:53:15,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-17 21:53:15,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-17 21:53:15,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-17 21:53:15,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-17 21:53:15,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-17 21:53:15,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-17 21:53:15,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-17 21:53:15,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-17 21:53:15,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-17 21:53:15,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-17 21:53:15,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-17 21:53:15,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-17 21:53:15,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-17 21:53:15,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-17 21:53:15,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-17 21:53:15,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-17 21:53:15,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-17 21:53:15,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-17 21:53:15,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-17 21:53:15,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-17 21:53:15,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-17 21:53:15,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-17 21:53:15,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-17 21:53:15,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-17 21:53:15,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-17 21:53:15,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-17 21:53:15,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-17 21:53:15,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-17 21:53:15,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-17 21:53:15,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-17 21:53:15,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-17 21:53:15,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-17 21:53:15,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-17 21:53:15,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-17 21:53:15,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-17 21:53:15,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-17 21:53:15,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-17 21:53:15,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-17 21:53:15,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-17 21:53:15,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-17 21:53:15,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-17 21:53:15,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-17 21:53:15,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-17 21:53:15,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-17 21:53:15,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-17 21:53:15,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-17 21:53:15,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-17 21:53:15,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-17 21:53:15,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-17 21:53:15,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-17 21:53:15,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-17 21:53:15,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-17 21:53:15,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-17 21:53:15,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-17 21:53:15,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-17 21:53:15,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-17 21:53:15,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-17 21:53:15,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-17 21:53:15,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-17 21:53:15,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-17 21:53:15,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-17 21:53:15,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-17 21:53:15,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-17 21:53:15,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-17 21:53:15,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-17 21:53:15,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-17 21:53:15,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-17 21:53:15,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-17 21:53:15,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-17 21:53:15,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-17 21:53:15,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-17 21:53:15,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-17 21:53:15,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-17 21:53:15,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-17 21:53:15,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-17 21:53:15,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-17 21:53:15,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-17 21:53:15,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-17 21:53:15,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-17 21:53:15,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-17 21:53:15,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-17 21:53:15,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-17 21:53:15,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-17 21:53:15,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-17 21:53:15,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-17 21:53:15,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-17 21:53:15,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-17 21:53:15,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-17 21:53:15,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-17 21:53:15,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-17 21:53:15,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-17 21:53:15,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-17 21:53:15,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-17 21:53:15,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-17 21:53:15,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-17 21:53:15,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-17 21:53:15,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-17 21:53:15,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-17 21:53:15,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-17 21:53:15,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-17 21:53:15,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-17 21:53:15,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-17 21:53:15,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-17 21:53:15,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-17 21:53:15,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-17 21:53:15,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-17 21:53:15,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-17 21:53:15,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-17 21:53:15,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-17 21:53:15,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-17 21:53:15,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-17 21:53:15,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-17 21:53:15,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-17 21:53:15,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-17 21:53:15,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-17 21:53:15,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-17 21:53:15,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-17 21:53:15,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-17 21:53:15,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-17 21:53:15,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-17 21:53:15,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-17 21:53:15,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-17 21:53:15,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-17 21:53:15,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-17 21:53:15,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-17 21:53:15,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-17 21:53:15,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-17 21:53:15,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-17 21:53:15,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-17 21:53:15,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-17 21:53:15,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-17 21:53:15,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-17 21:53:15,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-17 21:53:15,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-17 21:53:15,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-17 21:53:15,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-17 21:53:15,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-17 21:53:15,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-17 21:53:15,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-17 21:53:15,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-17 21:53:15,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-17 21:53:15,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-17 21:53:15,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-17 21:53:15,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-17 21:53:15,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-17 21:53:15,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-17 21:53:15,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-17 21:53:15,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-17 21:53:15,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-17 21:53:15,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-17 21:53:15,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-17 21:53:15,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-17 21:53:15,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-17 21:53:15,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-17 21:53:15,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-17 21:53:15,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-17 21:53:15,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-17 21:53:15,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-17 21:53:15,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-17 21:53:15,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-17 21:53:15,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-17 21:53:15,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-17 21:53:15,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-17 21:53:15,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-17 21:53:15,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-17 21:53:15,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-17 21:53:15,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-17 21:53:15,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-17 21:53:15,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-17 21:53:15,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-17 21:53:15,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-17 21:53:15,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-17 21:53:15,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-17 21:53:15,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-17 21:53:15,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-17 21:53:15,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-17 21:53:15,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-17 21:53:15,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-17 21:53:15,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-17 21:53:15,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-17 21:53:15,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-17 21:53:15,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-17 21:53:15,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-17 21:53:15,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-17 21:53:15,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-17 21:53:15,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-17 21:53:15,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-17 21:53:15,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-17 21:53:15,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-17 21:53:15,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-17 21:53:15,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-17 21:53:15,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-17 21:53:15,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-17 21:53:15,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-17 21:53:15,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-17 21:53:15,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-17 21:53:15,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-17 21:53:15,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-17 21:53:15,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-17 21:53:15,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-17 21:53:15,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-17 21:53:15,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-17 21:53:15,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-17 21:53:15,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-17 21:53:15,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-17 21:53:15,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-17 21:53:15,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-17 21:53:15,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-17 21:53:15,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-17 21:53:15,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-17 21:53:15,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-17 21:53:15,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-17 21:53:15,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-17 21:53:15,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-17 21:53:15,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-17 21:53:15,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-17 21:53:15,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-17 21:53:15,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-17 21:53:15,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-17 21:53:15,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-17 21:53:15,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-17 21:53:15,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-17 21:53:15,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-17 21:53:15,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-17 21:53:15,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-17 21:53:15,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-17 21:53:15,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-17 21:53:15,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-17 21:53:15,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-17 21:53:15,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-17 21:53:15,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-17 21:53:15,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-17 21:53:15,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-17 21:53:15,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-17 21:53:15,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-17 21:53:15,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-17 21:53:15,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-17 21:53:15,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-17 21:53:15,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-17 21:53:15,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-17 21:53:15,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-17 21:53:15,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-17 21:53:15,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-17 21:53:15,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-17 21:53:15,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-17 21:53:15,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-17 21:53:15,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-17 21:53:15,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-17 21:53:15,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-17 21:53:15,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-17 21:53:15,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-17 21:53:15,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-17 21:53:15,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-17 21:53:15,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-17 21:53:15,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-17 21:53:15,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-17 21:53:15,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-17 21:53:15,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-17 21:53:15,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-17 21:53:15,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-17 21:53:15,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-17 21:53:15,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-17 21:53:15,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-17 21:53:15,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-17 21:53:15,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-17 21:53:15,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-17 21:53:15,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-17 21:53:15,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-17 21:53:15,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-17 21:53:15,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-17 21:53:15,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-17 21:53:15,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-17 21:53:15,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-17 21:53:15,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-17 21:53:15,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-17 21:53:15,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-17 21:53:15,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-17 21:53:15,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-17 21:53:15,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-17 21:53:15,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-17 21:53:15,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-17 21:53:15,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-17 21:53:15,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-17 21:53:15,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-17 21:53:15,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-17 21:53:15,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-17 21:53:15,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-17 21:53:15,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-17 21:53:15,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-17 21:53:15,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-17 21:53:15,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-17 21:53:15,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-17 21:53:15,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-17 21:53:15,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-17 21:53:15,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-17 21:53:15,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-17 21:53:15,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-17 21:53:15,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-17 21:53:15,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-17 21:53:15,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-17 21:53:15,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-17 21:53:15,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-17 21:53:15,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-17 21:53:15,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-17 21:53:15,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-17 21:53:15,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-17 21:53:15,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-17 21:53:15,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-17 21:53:15,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-17 21:53:15,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-17 21:53:15,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-17 21:53:15,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-17 21:53:15,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-17 21:53:15,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-17 21:53:15,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-17 21:53:15,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-17 21:53:15,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-17 21:53:15,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-17 21:53:15,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-17 21:53:15,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-17 21:53:15,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:15,310 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table25) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:15,310 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table26
2023-07-17 21:53:15,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv871358531=369, srv64697211=312, srv653261481=314, srv1778141916=154, srv716510755=323, srv372169288=255, srv568235512=298, srv710229516=322, srv537137712=293, srv1682791519=131, srv642353994=311, srv1046656068=13, srv993792848=391, srv1202667070=39, srv99567927=392, srv1607947050=111, srv1677371877=129, srv1763526149=150, srv1763378353=149, srv531263272=289, srv448398842=270, srv802808934=348, srv77960001=340, srv453521623=271, srv162773041=114, srv563606057=295, srv1659238910=122, srv1279307656=55, srv1914255334=183, srv1296605582=61, srv2131597846=222, srv1375359355=72, srv1405269336=79, srv175680261=147, srv282211488=242, srv1412891098=82, srv375712549=257, srv191234370=182, srv1574132168=106, srv1853511149=168, srv617306884=307, srv268601623=238, srv1400099806=78, srv477381292=275, srv1279442050=56, srv535853198=292, srv1767480590=152, srv2100700333=211, srv1187847151=37, srv791064637=345, srv74478935=330, srv1206084762=41, srv1497856295=97, srv897884865=377, srv398014971=261, srv786136704=342, srv1429879791=86, srv1201763981=38, srv1415213844=84, srv302220908=243, srv156683359=105, srv1974497084=192, srv535358845=291, srv627763604=308, srv732106437=326, srv1679724304=130, srv576770232=299, srv478480013=276, srv1237250370=47, srv1169018295=34, srv32320833=248, srv594880186=304, srv216306370=225, srv656484240=315, srv818754908=354, srv1321058011=63, srv1256345927=52, srv1670847243=126, srv1515243164=99, srv1781378955=156, srv508388209=278, srv1910886192=180, srv1718898730=139, srv772274482=337, srv1433624807=87, srv848605385=359, srv2107957639=212, srv270591905=240, srv2126706298=219, srv2080681743=209, srv1683990934=132, srv11526364=28, srv761020484=334, srv1720507603=141, srv266276730=236, srv935213051=386, srv923440665=383, srv1911104834=181, srv1944131651=187, srv1162841146=30, srv1921230216=185, srv319459319=247, srv1168022226=33, srv57689659=300, srv716533901=324, srv1255156178=50, srv441379967=267, srv806979625=350, srv788255577=344, srv976533744=389, srv1317853355=62, srv1491073587=96, srv777865249=339, srv2130226580=221, srv873230355=370, srv971370780=388, srv2008207413=197, srv989150800=390, srv737980208=328, srv862088563=363, srv1716783669=138, srv1801293056=160, srv1363984373=68, srv515711115=282, srv1378945327=75, srv17002515=136, srv853498273=361, srv1825292480=165, srv2124576425=217, srv1889349340=175, srv527691188=286, srv1226737728=44, srv1781498156=157, srv104267960=11, srv1663644309=124, srv1672213768=127, srv740402944=329, srv555807163=294, srv566277037=296, srv734882045=327, srv1143683685=27, srv1021400966=5, srv694407347=319, srv1626790310=113, srv303328507=244, srv1869166689=171, srv781623755=341, srv40741117=264, srv1958265988=190, srv592380483=303, srv483565354=277, srv1531731329=100, srv359746409=253, srv1271131029=54, srv1007512250=2, srv1783696565=158, srv1284150263=57, srv1648846971=118, srv120365207=40, srv263085176=235, srv535080964=290, srv824739010=357, srv744793832=331, srv1073394883=18, srv1113186104=23, srv1370321362=69, srv328204461=249, srv1604342762=109, srv266460489=237, srv313806624=245, srv1473408823=93, srv865692144=366, srv42814401=265, srv104065318=10, srv1599236554=108, srv1476834435=94, srv1673452142=128, srv716892727=325, srv1501773847=98, srv791504502=346, srv367902453=254, srv254349567=232, srv2126102976=218, srv252714068=231, srv916506189=380, srv687320190=318, srv1000433998=0, srv51396503=281, srv648464134=313, srv908419423=379, srv204022732=200, srv1901650254=177, srv200342397=196, srv765841762=335, srv1849125656=167, srv235281774=226, srv2137298641=224, srv517347076=283, srv1687711069=135, srv800105834=347, srv1609917009=112, srv1038797815=9, srv863216619=365, srv921796978=382, srv895924009=376, srv319002955=246, srv611122413=305, srv1942590787=186, srv529333113=288, srv1053973741=14, srv1988512138=194, srv1037112526=8, srv442327402=268, srv2062351281=204, srv1240518778=48, srv471289019=274, srv1857090224=170, srv1543025253=101, srv1915241294=184, srv238420451=228, srv1747796150=145, srv1101668258=21, srv1437034663=88, srv1173449481=35, srv582652595=301, srv1739043021=144, srv1733173130=143, srv465824154=272, srv14463216=91, srv1720161153=140, srv1549403995=102, srv235920151=227, srv1909060246=179, srv527988350=287, srv1801762669=161, srv89501442=375, srv442994824=269, srv1414012241=83, srv165153258=121, srv1766333515=151, srv2063438865=205, srv1071671801=17, srv1638570398=116, srv1035353226=7, srv1856921753=169, srv1887444158=173, srv1897306674=176, srv1255718022=51, srv1260078897=53, srv1372945218=70, srv1163715139=31, srv175471358=146, srv1558656747=104, srv1463869996=92, srv124825865=49, srv1142495625=26, srv1397803774=77, srv1644508836=117, srv1807320536=162, srv1165273546=32, srv1650978005=120, srv1374260725=71, srv2065239646=206, srv1685737274=134, srv878340336=371, srv329463090=250, srv2112675912=213, srv1378293943=74, srv787532288=343, srv1292867420=59, srv519831391=285, srv1002018470=1, srv822141051=356, srv1229740495=45, srv706370370=321, srv255741565=233, srv1177018836=36, srv1223505925=43, srv745532463=332, srv1820836786=163, srv2127145828=220, srv2124524081=216, srv665150476=316, srv2132621880=223, srv2051928856=203, srv1903063797=178, srv881186303=373, srv1758974023=148, srv270549378=239, srv2014789268=198, srv1663469360=123, srv1331983035=65, srv1768940632=153, srv2084732799=210, srv1043044287=12, srv630246195=309, srv86319792=364, srv37305654=256, srv1650394019=119, srv1888093001=174, srv512441512=280, srv813969264=352, srv277288989=241, srv2017714321=199, srv1410469782=81, srv751917673=333, srv1443060804=89, srv1997063872=195, srv404426071=263, srv1443287861=90, srv695697141=320, srv636958174=310, srv1105584096=22, srv583005569=302, srv92523166=384, srv330226906=251, srv1684865692=133, srv381463497=258, srv567942525=297, srv1010403208=3, srv881516937=374, srv140693587=80, srv1872213858=172, srv262210172=234, srv846799674=358, srv851169364=360, srv880017865=372, srv129190288=58, srv401606217=262, srv669535820=317, srv1325384866=64, srv1377673856=73, srv1416276025=85, srv430431276=266, srv81513922=353, srv2044458062=201, srv2118166427=214, srv1665530216=125, srv2045587532=202, srv1824773168=164, srv2071913725=208, srv1295499145=60, srv1780304939=155, srv612277490=306, srv102508625=6, srv1637539828=115, srv820424989=355, srv50966795=279, srv1950402166=188, srv1207208580=42, srv1057648579=16, srv1084295726=20, srv39165764=260, srv959379519=387, srv2066402828=207, srv1556810592=103, srv1232731779=46, srv1606144164=110, srv1487275322=95, srv519310224=284, srv775221203=338, srv1079168923=19, srv1957834842=189, srv866525142=367, srv243907419=229, srv248553307=230, srv344122075=252, srv467461515=273, srv805609280=349, srv1018507425=4, srv1827511993=166, srv1704639485=137, srv855754935=362, srv1057024901=15, srv1116429721=24, srv927375731=385, srv1383836323=76, srv1584407048=107, srv809779157=351, srv1786622589=159, srv869541705=368, srv1123072042=25, srv1726136626=142, srv135800579=67, srv1958676591=191, srv390748718=259, srv907223095=378, srv76871917=336, srv1160170031=29, srv2119727728=215, srv918100507=381, srv1352063642=66, srv1975716907=193} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:15,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:15,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:15,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:15,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:15,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:15,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:15,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:15,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:15,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:15,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:15,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-17 21:53:15,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-17 21:53:15,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-17 21:53:15,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-17 21:53:15,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-17 21:53:15,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-17 21:53:15,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-17 21:53:15,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-17 21:53:15,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-17 21:53:15,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-17 21:53:15,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-17 21:53:15,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-17 21:53:15,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-17 21:53:15,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-17 21:53:15,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-17 21:53:15,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-17 21:53:15,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-17 21:53:15,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-17 21:53:15,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-17 21:53:15,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-17 21:53:15,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-17 21:53:15,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-17 21:53:15,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-17 21:53:15,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-17 21:53:15,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-17 21:53:15,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-17 21:53:15,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-17 21:53:15,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-17 21:53:15,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-17 21:53:15,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-17 21:53:15,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-17 21:53:15,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-17 21:53:15,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-17 21:53:15,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-17 21:53:15,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-17 21:53:15,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-17 21:53:15,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-17 21:53:15,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-17 21:53:15,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-17 21:53:15,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-17 21:53:15,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-17 21:53:15,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-17 21:53:15,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-17 21:53:15,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-17 21:53:15,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-17 21:53:15,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-17 21:53:15,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-17 21:53:15,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-17 21:53:15,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-17 21:53:15,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-17 21:53:15,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-17 21:53:15,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-17 21:53:15,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-17 21:53:15,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-17 21:53:15,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-17 21:53:15,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-17 21:53:15,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-17 21:53:15,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-17 21:53:15,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-17 21:53:15,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-17 21:53:15,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-17 21:53:15,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-17 21:53:15,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-17 21:53:15,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-17 21:53:15,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-17 21:53:15,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-17 21:53:15,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-17 21:53:15,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-17 21:53:15,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-17 21:53:15,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-17 21:53:15,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-17 21:53:15,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-17 21:53:15,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-17 21:53:15,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-17 21:53:15,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-17 21:53:15,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-17 21:53:15,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-17 21:53:15,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-17 21:53:15,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-17 21:53:15,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-17 21:53:15,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-17 21:53:15,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-17 21:53:15,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-17 21:53:15,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-17 21:53:15,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-17 21:53:15,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-17 21:53:15,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-17 21:53:15,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-17 21:53:15,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-17 21:53:15,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-17 21:53:15,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-17 21:53:15,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-17 21:53:15,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-17 21:53:15,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-17 21:53:15,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-17 21:53:15,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-17 21:53:15,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-17 21:53:15,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-17 21:53:15,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-17 21:53:15,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-17 21:53:15,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-17 21:53:15,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-17 21:53:15,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-17 21:53:15,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-17 21:53:15,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-17 21:53:15,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-17 21:53:15,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-17 21:53:15,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-17 21:53:15,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-17 21:53:15,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-17 21:53:15,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-17 21:53:15,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-17 21:53:15,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-17 21:53:15,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-17 21:53:15,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-17 21:53:15,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-17 21:53:15,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-17 21:53:15,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-17 21:53:15,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-17 21:53:15,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-17 21:53:15,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-17 21:53:15,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-17 21:53:15,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-17 21:53:15,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-17 21:53:15,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-17 21:53:15,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-17 21:53:15,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-17 21:53:15,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-17 21:53:15,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-17 21:53:15,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-17 21:53:15,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-17 21:53:15,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-17 21:53:15,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-17 21:53:15,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-17 21:53:15,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-17 21:53:15,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-17 21:53:15,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-17 21:53:15,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-17 21:53:15,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-17 21:53:15,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-17 21:53:15,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-17 21:53:15,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-17 21:53:15,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-17 21:53:15,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-17 21:53:15,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-17 21:53:15,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-17 21:53:15,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-17 21:53:15,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-17 21:53:15,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-17 21:53:15,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-17 21:53:15,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-17 21:53:15,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-17 21:53:15,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-17 21:53:15,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-17 21:53:15,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-17 21:53:15,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-17 21:53:15,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-17 21:53:15,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-17 21:53:15,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-17 21:53:15,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-17 21:53:15,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-17 21:53:15,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-17 21:53:15,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-17 21:53:15,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-17 21:53:15,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-17 21:53:15,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-17 21:53:15,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-17 21:53:15,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-17 21:53:15,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-17 21:53:15,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-17 21:53:15,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-17 21:53:15,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-17 21:53:15,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-17 21:53:15,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-17 21:53:15,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-17 21:53:15,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-17 21:53:15,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-17 21:53:15,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-17 21:53:15,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-17 21:53:15,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-17 21:53:15,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-17 21:53:15,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-17 21:53:15,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-17 21:53:15,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-17 21:53:15,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-17 21:53:15,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-17 21:53:15,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-17 21:53:15,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-17 21:53:15,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-17 21:53:15,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-17 21:53:15,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-17 21:53:15,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-17 21:53:15,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-17 21:53:15,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-17 21:53:15,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-17 21:53:15,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-17 21:53:15,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-17 21:53:15,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-17 21:53:15,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-17 21:53:15,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-17 21:53:15,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-17 21:53:15,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-17 21:53:15,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-17 21:53:15,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-17 21:53:15,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-17 21:53:15,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-17 21:53:15,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-17 21:53:15,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-17 21:53:15,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-17 21:53:15,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-17 21:53:15,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-17 21:53:15,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-17 21:53:15,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-17 21:53:15,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-17 21:53:15,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-17 21:53:15,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-17 21:53:15,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-17 21:53:15,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-17 21:53:15,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-17 21:53:15,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-17 21:53:15,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-17 21:53:15,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-17 21:53:15,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-17 21:53:15,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-17 21:53:15,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-17 21:53:15,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-17 21:53:15,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-17 21:53:15,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-17 21:53:15,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-17 21:53:15,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-17 21:53:15,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-17 21:53:15,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-17 21:53:15,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-17 21:53:15,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-17 21:53:15,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-17 21:53:15,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-17 21:53:15,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-17 21:53:15,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-17 21:53:15,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-17 21:53:15,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-17 21:53:15,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-17 21:53:15,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-17 21:53:15,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-17 21:53:15,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-17 21:53:15,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-17 21:53:15,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-17 21:53:15,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-17 21:53:15,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-17 21:53:15,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-17 21:53:15,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-17 21:53:15,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-17 21:53:15,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-17 21:53:15,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-17 21:53:15,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-17 21:53:15,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-17 21:53:15,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-17 21:53:15,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-17 21:53:15,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-17 21:53:15,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-17 21:53:15,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-17 21:53:15,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-17 21:53:15,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-17 21:53:15,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-17 21:53:15,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-17 21:53:15,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-17 21:53:15,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-17 21:53:15,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-17 21:53:15,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-17 21:53:15,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-17 21:53:15,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-17 21:53:15,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-17 21:53:15,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-17 21:53:15,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-17 21:53:15,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-17 21:53:15,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-17 21:53:15,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-17 21:53:15,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-17 21:53:15,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-17 21:53:15,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-17 21:53:15,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-17 21:53:15,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-17 21:53:15,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-17 21:53:15,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-17 21:53:15,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-17 21:53:15,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-17 21:53:15,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-17 21:53:15,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-17 21:53:15,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-17 21:53:15,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-17 21:53:15,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-17 21:53:15,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-17 21:53:15,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-17 21:53:15,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-17 21:53:15,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-17 21:53:15,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-17 21:53:15,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-17 21:53:15,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-17 21:53:15,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-17 21:53:15,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-17 21:53:15,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-17 21:53:15,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-17 21:53:15,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-17 21:53:15,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-17 21:53:15,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-17 21:53:15,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-17 21:53:15,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-17 21:53:15,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-17 21:53:15,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-17 21:53:15,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-17 21:53:15,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-17 21:53:15,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-17 21:53:15,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-17 21:53:15,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-17 21:53:15,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-17 21:53:15,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-17 21:53:15,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-17 21:53:15,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-17 21:53:15,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-17 21:53:15,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-17 21:53:15,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-17 21:53:15,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-17 21:53:15,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-17 21:53:15,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-17 21:53:15,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-17 21:53:15,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-17 21:53:15,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-17 21:53:15,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-17 21:53:15,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-17 21:53:15,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-17 21:53:15,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-17 21:53:15,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-17 21:53:15,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-17 21:53:15,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-17 21:53:15,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-17 21:53:15,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-17 21:53:15,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-17 21:53:15,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-17 21:53:15,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-17 21:53:15,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-17 21:53:15,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-17 21:53:15,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-17 21:53:15,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-17 21:53:15,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-17 21:53:15,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-17 21:53:15,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-17 21:53:15,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-17 21:53:15,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-17 21:53:15,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-17 21:53:15,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-17 21:53:15,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-17 21:53:15,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-17 21:53:15,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-17 21:53:15,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-17 21:53:15,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-17 21:53:15,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-17 21:53:15,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-17 21:53:15,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-17 21:53:15,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-17 21:53:15,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-17 21:53:15,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-17 21:53:15,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-17 21:53:15,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-17 21:53:15,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-17 21:53:15,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-17 21:53:15,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-17 21:53:15,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-17 21:53:15,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-17 21:53:15,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-17 21:53:15,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-17 21:53:15,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-17 21:53:15,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-17 21:53:15,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-17 21:53:15,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-17 21:53:15,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-17 21:53:15,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-17 21:53:15,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-17 21:53:15,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-17 21:53:15,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-17 21:53:15,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-17 21:53:15,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-17 21:53:15,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-17 21:53:15,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-17 21:53:15,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-17 21:53:15,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:15,324 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table26) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:15,325 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table27
2023-07-17 21:53:15,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv871358531=369, srv64697211=312, srv653261481=314, srv1778141916=154, srv716510755=323, srv372169288=255, srv568235512=298, srv710229516=322, srv537137712=293, srv1682791519=131, srv642353994=311, srv1046656068=13, srv993792848=391, srv1202667070=39, srv99567927=392, srv1607947050=111, srv1677371877=129, srv1763526149=150, srv1763378353=149, srv531263272=289, srv448398842=270, srv802808934=348, srv77960001=340, srv453521623=271, srv162773041=114, srv563606057=295, srv1659238910=122, srv1279307656=55, srv1914255334=183, srv1296605582=61, srv2131597846=222, srv1375359355=72, srv1405269336=79, srv175680261=147, srv282211488=242, srv1412891098=82, srv375712549=257, srv191234370=182, srv1574132168=106, srv1853511149=168, srv617306884=307, srv268601623=238, srv1400099806=78, srv477381292=275, srv1279442050=56, srv535853198=292, srv1767480590=152, srv2100700333=211, srv1187847151=37, srv791064637=345, srv74478935=330, srv1206084762=41, srv1497856295=97, srv897884865=377, srv398014971=261, srv786136704=342, srv1429879791=86, srv1201763981=38, srv1415213844=84, srv302220908=243, srv156683359=105, srv1974497084=192, srv535358845=291, srv627763604=308, srv732106437=326, srv1679724304=130, srv576770232=299, srv478480013=276, srv1237250370=47, srv1169018295=34, srv32320833=248, srv594880186=304, srv216306370=225, srv656484240=315, srv818754908=354, srv1321058011=63, srv1256345927=52, srv1670847243=126, srv1515243164=99, srv1781378955=156, srv508388209=278, srv1910886192=180, srv1718898730=139, srv772274482=337, srv1433624807=87, srv848605385=359, srv2107957639=212, srv270591905=240, srv2126706298=219, srv2080681743=209, srv1683990934=132, srv11526364=28, srv761020484=334, srv1720507603=141, srv266276730=236, srv935213051=386, srv923440665=383, srv1911104834=181, srv1944131651=187, srv1162841146=30, srv1921230216=185, srv319459319=247, srv1168022226=33, srv57689659=300, srv716533901=324, srv1255156178=50, srv441379967=267, srv806979625=350, srv788255577=344, srv976533744=389, srv1317853355=62, srv1491073587=96, srv777865249=339, srv2130226580=221, srv873230355=370, srv971370780=388, srv2008207413=197, srv989150800=390, srv737980208=328, srv862088563=363, srv1716783669=138, srv1801293056=160, srv1363984373=68, srv515711115=282, srv1378945327=75, srv17002515=136, srv853498273=361, srv1825292480=165, srv2124576425=217, srv1889349340=175, srv527691188=286, srv1226737728=44, srv1781498156=157, srv104267960=11, srv1663644309=124, srv1672213768=127, srv740402944=329, srv555807163=294, srv566277037=296, srv734882045=327, srv1143683685=27, srv1021400966=5, srv694407347=319, srv1626790310=113, srv303328507=244, srv1869166689=171, srv781623755=341, srv40741117=264, srv1958265988=190, srv592380483=303, srv483565354=277, srv1531731329=100, srv359746409=253, srv1271131029=54, srv1007512250=2, srv1783696565=158, srv1284150263=57, srv1648846971=118, srv120365207=40, srv263085176=235, srv535080964=290, srv824739010=357, srv744793832=331, srv1073394883=18, srv1113186104=23, srv1370321362=69, srv328204461=249, srv1604342762=109, srv266460489=237, srv313806624=245, srv1473408823=93, srv865692144=366, srv42814401=265, srv104065318=10, srv1599236554=108, srv1476834435=94, srv1673452142=128, srv716892727=325, srv1501773847=98, srv791504502=346, srv367902453=254, srv254349567=232, srv2126102976=218, srv252714068=231, srv916506189=380, srv687320190=318, srv1000433998=0, srv51396503=281, srv648464134=313, srv908419423=379, srv204022732=200, srv1901650254=177, srv200342397=196, srv765841762=335, srv1849125656=167, srv235281774=226, srv2137298641=224, srv517347076=283, srv1687711069=135, srv800105834=347, srv1609917009=112, srv1038797815=9, srv863216619=365, srv921796978=382, srv895924009=376, srv319002955=246, srv611122413=305, srv1942590787=186, srv529333113=288, srv1053973741=14, srv1988512138=194, srv1037112526=8, srv442327402=268, srv2062351281=204, srv1240518778=48, srv471289019=274, srv1857090224=170, srv1543025253=101, srv1915241294=184, srv238420451=228, srv1747796150=145, srv1101668258=21, srv1437034663=88, srv1173449481=35, srv582652595=301, srv1739043021=144, srv1733173130=143, srv465824154=272, srv14463216=91, srv1720161153=140, srv1549403995=102, srv235920151=227, srv1909060246=179, srv527988350=287, srv1801762669=161, srv89501442=375, srv442994824=269, srv1414012241=83, srv165153258=121, srv1766333515=151, srv2063438865=205, srv1071671801=17, srv1638570398=116, srv1035353226=7, srv1856921753=169, srv1887444158=173, srv1897306674=176, srv1255718022=51, srv1260078897=53, srv1372945218=70, srv1163715139=31, srv175471358=146, srv1558656747=104, srv1463869996=92, srv124825865=49, srv1142495625=26, srv1397803774=77, srv1644508836=117, srv1807320536=162, srv1165273546=32, srv1650978005=120, srv1374260725=71, srv2065239646=206, srv1685737274=134, srv878340336=371, srv329463090=250, srv2112675912=213, srv1378293943=74, srv787532288=343, srv1292867420=59, srv519831391=285, srv1002018470=1, srv822141051=356, srv1229740495=45, srv706370370=321, srv255741565=233, srv1177018836=36, srv1223505925=43, srv745532463=332, srv1820836786=163, srv2127145828=220, srv2124524081=216, srv665150476=316, srv2132621880=223, srv2051928856=203, srv1903063797=178, srv881186303=373, srv1758974023=148, srv270549378=239, srv2014789268=198, srv1663469360=123, srv1331983035=65, srv1768940632=153, srv2084732799=210, srv1043044287=12, srv630246195=309, srv86319792=364, srv37305654=256, srv1650394019=119, srv1888093001=174, srv512441512=280, srv813969264=352, srv277288989=241, srv2017714321=199, srv1410469782=81, srv751917673=333, srv1443060804=89, srv1997063872=195, srv404426071=263, srv1443287861=90, srv695697141=320, srv636958174=310, srv1105584096=22, srv583005569=302, srv92523166=384, srv330226906=251, srv1684865692=133, srv381463497=258, srv567942525=297, srv1010403208=3, srv881516937=374, srv140693587=80, srv1872213858=172, srv262210172=234, srv846799674=358, srv851169364=360, srv880017865=372, srv129190288=58, srv401606217=262, srv669535820=317, srv1325384866=64, srv1377673856=73, srv1416276025=85, srv430431276=266, srv81513922=353, srv2044458062=201, srv2118166427=214, srv1665530216=125, srv2045587532=202, srv1824773168=164, srv2071913725=208, srv1295499145=60, srv1780304939=155, srv612277490=306, srv102508625=6, srv1637539828=115, srv820424989=355, srv50966795=279, srv1950402166=188, srv1207208580=42, srv1057648579=16, srv1084295726=20, srv39165764=260, srv959379519=387, srv2066402828=207, srv1556810592=103, srv1232731779=46, srv1606144164=110, srv1487275322=95, srv519310224=284, srv775221203=338, srv1079168923=19, srv1957834842=189, srv866525142=367, srv243907419=229, srv248553307=230, srv344122075=252, srv467461515=273, srv805609280=349, srv1018507425=4, srv1827511993=166, srv1704639485=137, srv855754935=362, srv1057024901=15, srv1116429721=24, srv927375731=385, srv1383836323=76, srv1584407048=107, srv809779157=351, srv1786622589=159, srv869541705=368, srv1123072042=25, srv1726136626=142, srv135800579=67, srv1958676591=191, srv390748718=259, srv907223095=378, srv76871917=336, srv1160170031=29, srv2119727728=215, srv918100507=381, srv1352063642=66, srv1975716907=193} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:15,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:15,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:15,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:15,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:15,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:15,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:15,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:15,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:15,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:15,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:15,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-17 21:53:15,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-17 21:53:15,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-17 21:53:15,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-17 21:53:15,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-17 21:53:15,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-17 21:53:15,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-17 21:53:15,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-17 21:53:15,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-17 21:53:15,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-17 21:53:15,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-17 21:53:15,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-17 21:53:15,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-17 21:53:15,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-17 21:53:15,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-17 21:53:15,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-17 21:53:15,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-17 21:53:15,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-17 21:53:15,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-17 21:53:15,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-17 21:53:15,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-17 21:53:15,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-17 21:53:15,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-17 21:53:15,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-17 21:53:15,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-17 21:53:15,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-17 21:53:15,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-17 21:53:15,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-17 21:53:15,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-17 21:53:15,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-17 21:53:15,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-17 21:53:15,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-17 21:53:15,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-17 21:53:15,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-17 21:53:15,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-17 21:53:15,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-17 21:53:15,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-17 21:53:15,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-17 21:53:15,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-17 21:53:15,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-17 21:53:15,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-17 21:53:15,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-17 21:53:15,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-17 21:53:15,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-17 21:53:15,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-17 21:53:15,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-17 21:53:15,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-17 21:53:15,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-17 21:53:15,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-17 21:53:15,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-17 21:53:15,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-17 21:53:15,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-17 21:53:15,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-17 21:53:15,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-17 21:53:15,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-17 21:53:15,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-17 21:53:15,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-17 21:53:15,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-17 21:53:15,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-17 21:53:15,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-17 21:53:15,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-17 21:53:15,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-17 21:53:15,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-17 21:53:15,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-17 21:53:15,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-17 21:53:15,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-17 21:53:15,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-17 21:53:15,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-17 21:53:15,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-17 21:53:15,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-17 21:53:15,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-17 21:53:15,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-17 21:53:15,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-17 21:53:15,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-17 21:53:15,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-17 21:53:15,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-17 21:53:15,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-17 21:53:15,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-17 21:53:15,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-17 21:53:15,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-17 21:53:15,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-17 21:53:15,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-17 21:53:15,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-17 21:53:15,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-17 21:53:15,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-17 21:53:15,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-17 21:53:15,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-17 21:53:15,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-17 21:53:15,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-17 21:53:15,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-17 21:53:15,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-17 21:53:15,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-17 21:53:15,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-17 21:53:15,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-17 21:53:15,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-17 21:53:15,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-17 21:53:15,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-17 21:53:15,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-17 21:53:15,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-17 21:53:15,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-17 21:53:15,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-17 21:53:15,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-17 21:53:15,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-17 21:53:15,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-17 21:53:15,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-17 21:53:15,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-17 21:53:15,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-17 21:53:15,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-17 21:53:15,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-17 21:53:15,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-17 21:53:15,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-17 21:53:15,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-17 21:53:15,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-17 21:53:15,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-17 21:53:15,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-17 21:53:15,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-17 21:53:15,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-17 21:53:15,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-17 21:53:15,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-17 21:53:15,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-17 21:53:15,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-17 21:53:15,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-17 21:53:15,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-17 21:53:15,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-17 21:53:15,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-17 21:53:15,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-17 21:53:15,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-17 21:53:15,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-17 21:53:15,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-17 21:53:15,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-17 21:53:15,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-17 21:53:15,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-17 21:53:15,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-17 21:53:15,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-17 21:53:15,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-17 21:53:15,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-17 21:53:15,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-17 21:53:15,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-17 21:53:15,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-17 21:53:15,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-17 21:53:15,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-17 21:53:15,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-17 21:53:15,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-17 21:53:15,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-17 21:53:15,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-17 21:53:15,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-17 21:53:15,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-17 21:53:15,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-17 21:53:15,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-17 21:53:15,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-17 21:53:15,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-17 21:53:15,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-17 21:53:15,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-17 21:53:15,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-17 21:53:15,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-17 21:53:15,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-17 21:53:15,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-17 21:53:15,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-17 21:53:15,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-17 21:53:15,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-17 21:53:15,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-17 21:53:15,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-17 21:53:15,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-17 21:53:15,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-17 21:53:15,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-17 21:53:15,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-17 21:53:15,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-17 21:53:15,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-17 21:53:15,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-17 21:53:15,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-17 21:53:15,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-17 21:53:15,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-17 21:53:15,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-17 21:53:15,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-17 21:53:15,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-17 21:53:15,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-17 21:53:15,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-17 21:53:15,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-17 21:53:15,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-17 21:53:15,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-17 21:53:15,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-17 21:53:15,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-17 21:53:15,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-17 21:53:15,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-17 21:53:15,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-17 21:53:15,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-17 21:53:15,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-17 21:53:15,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-17 21:53:15,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-17 21:53:15,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-17 21:53:15,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-17 21:53:15,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-17 21:53:15,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-17 21:53:15,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-17 21:53:15,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-17 21:53:15,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-17 21:53:15,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-17 21:53:15,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-17 21:53:15,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-17 21:53:15,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-17 21:53:15,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-17 21:53:15,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-17 21:53:15,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-17 21:53:15,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-17 21:53:15,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-17 21:53:15,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-17 21:53:15,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-17 21:53:15,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-17 21:53:15,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-17 21:53:15,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-17 21:53:15,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-17 21:53:15,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-17 21:53:15,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-17 21:53:15,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-17 21:53:15,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-17 21:53:15,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-17 21:53:15,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-17 21:53:15,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-17 21:53:15,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-17 21:53:15,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-17 21:53:15,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-17 21:53:15,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-17 21:53:15,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-17 21:53:15,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-17 21:53:15,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-17 21:53:15,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-17 21:53:15,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-17 21:53:15,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-17 21:53:15,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-17 21:53:15,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-17 21:53:15,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-17 21:53:15,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-17 21:53:15,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-17 21:53:15,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-17 21:53:15,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-17 21:53:15,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-17 21:53:15,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-17 21:53:15,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-17 21:53:15,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-17 21:53:15,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-17 21:53:15,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-17 21:53:15,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-17 21:53:15,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-17 21:53:15,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-17 21:53:15,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-17 21:53:15,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-17 21:53:15,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-17 21:53:15,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-17 21:53:15,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-17 21:53:15,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-17 21:53:15,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-17 21:53:15,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-17 21:53:15,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-17 21:53:15,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-17 21:53:15,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-17 21:53:15,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-17 21:53:15,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-17 21:53:15,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-17 21:53:15,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-17 21:53:15,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-17 21:53:15,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-17 21:53:15,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-17 21:53:15,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-17 21:53:15,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-17 21:53:15,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-17 21:53:15,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-17 21:53:15,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-17 21:53:15,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-17 21:53:15,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-17 21:53:15,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-17 21:53:15,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-17 21:53:15,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-17 21:53:15,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-17 21:53:15,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-17 21:53:15,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-17 21:53:15,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-17 21:53:15,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-17 21:53:15,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-17 21:53:15,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-17 21:53:15,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-17 21:53:15,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-17 21:53:15,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-17 21:53:15,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-17 21:53:15,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-17 21:53:15,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-17 21:53:15,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-17 21:53:15,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-17 21:53:15,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-17 21:53:15,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-17 21:53:15,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-17 21:53:15,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-17 21:53:15,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-17 21:53:15,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-17 21:53:15,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-17 21:53:15,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-17 21:53:15,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-17 21:53:15,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-17 21:53:15,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-17 21:53:15,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-17 21:53:15,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-17 21:53:15,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-17 21:53:15,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-17 21:53:15,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-17 21:53:15,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-17 21:53:15,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-17 21:53:15,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-17 21:53:15,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-17 21:53:15,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-17 21:53:15,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-17 21:53:15,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-17 21:53:15,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-17 21:53:15,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-17 21:53:15,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-17 21:53:15,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-17 21:53:15,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-17 21:53:15,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-17 21:53:15,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-17 21:53:15,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-17 21:53:15,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-17 21:53:15,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-17 21:53:15,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-17 21:53:15,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-17 21:53:15,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-17 21:53:15,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-17 21:53:15,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-17 21:53:15,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-17 21:53:15,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-17 21:53:15,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-17 21:53:15,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-17 21:53:15,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-17 21:53:15,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-17 21:53:15,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-17 21:53:15,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-17 21:53:15,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-17 21:53:15,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-17 21:53:15,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-17 21:53:15,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-17 21:53:15,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-17 21:53:15,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-17 21:53:15,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-17 21:53:15,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-17 21:53:15,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-17 21:53:15,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-17 21:53:15,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-17 21:53:15,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-17 21:53:15,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-17 21:53:15,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-17 21:53:15,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-17 21:53:15,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-17 21:53:15,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-17 21:53:15,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-17 21:53:15,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-17 21:53:15,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-17 21:53:15,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-17 21:53:15,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-17 21:53:15,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-17 21:53:15,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-17 21:53:15,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-17 21:53:15,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-17 21:53:15,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-17 21:53:15,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-17 21:53:15,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-17 21:53:15,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-17 21:53:15,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-17 21:53:15,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-17 21:53:15,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-17 21:53:15,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-17 21:53:15,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-17 21:53:15,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-17 21:53:15,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-17 21:53:15,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-17 21:53:15,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-17 21:53:15,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-17 21:53:15,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-17 21:53:15,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-17 21:53:15,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-17 21:53:15,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-17 21:53:15,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-17 21:53:15,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-17 21:53:15,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-17 21:53:15,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-17 21:53:15,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-17 21:53:15,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-17 21:53:15,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:15,340 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table27) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:15,340 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table28
2023-07-17 21:53:15,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv871358531=369, srv64697211=312, srv653261481=314, srv1778141916=154, srv716510755=323, srv372169288=255, srv568235512=298, srv710229516=322, srv537137712=293, srv1682791519=131, srv642353994=311, srv1046656068=13, srv993792848=391, srv1202667070=39, srv99567927=392, srv1607947050=111, srv1677371877=129, srv1763526149=150, srv1763378353=149, srv531263272=289, srv448398842=270, srv802808934=348, srv77960001=340, srv453521623=271, srv162773041=114, srv563606057=295, srv1659238910=122, srv1279307656=55, srv1914255334=183, srv1296605582=61, srv2131597846=222, srv1375359355=72, srv1405269336=79, srv175680261=147, srv282211488=242, srv1412891098=82, srv375712549=257, srv191234370=182, srv1574132168=106, srv1853511149=168, srv617306884=307, srv268601623=238, srv1400099806=78, srv477381292=275, srv1279442050=56, srv535853198=292, srv1767480590=152, srv2100700333=211, srv1187847151=37, srv791064637=345, srv74478935=330, srv1206084762=41, srv1497856295=97, srv897884865=377, srv398014971=261, srv786136704=342, srv1429879791=86, srv1201763981=38, srv1415213844=84, srv302220908=243, srv156683359=105, srv1974497084=192, srv535358845=291, srv627763604=308, srv732106437=326, srv1679724304=130, srv576770232=299, srv478480013=276, srv1237250370=47, srv1169018295=34, srv32320833=248, srv594880186=304, srv216306370=225, srv656484240=315, srv818754908=354, srv1321058011=63, srv1256345927=52, srv1670847243=126, srv1515243164=99, srv1781378955=156, srv508388209=278, srv1910886192=180, srv1718898730=139, srv772274482=337, srv1433624807=87, srv848605385=359, srv2107957639=212, srv270591905=240, srv2126706298=219, srv2080681743=209, srv1683990934=132, srv11526364=28, srv761020484=334, srv1720507603=141, srv266276730=236, srv935213051=386, srv923440665=383, srv1911104834=181, srv1944131651=187, srv1162841146=30, srv1921230216=185, srv319459319=247, srv1168022226=33, srv57689659=300, srv716533901=324, srv1255156178=50, srv441379967=267, srv806979625=350, srv788255577=344, srv976533744=389, srv1317853355=62, srv1491073587=96, srv777865249=339, srv2130226580=221, srv873230355=370, srv971370780=388, srv2008207413=197, srv989150800=390, srv737980208=328, srv862088563=363, srv1716783669=138, srv1801293056=160, srv1363984373=68, srv515711115=282, srv1378945327=75, srv17002515=136, srv853498273=361, srv1825292480=165, srv2124576425=217, srv1889349340=175, srv527691188=286, srv1226737728=44, srv1781498156=157, srv104267960=11, srv1663644309=124, srv1672213768=127, srv740402944=329, srv555807163=294, srv566277037=296, srv734882045=327, srv1143683685=27, srv1021400966=5, srv694407347=319, srv1626790310=113, srv303328507=244, srv1869166689=171, srv781623755=341, srv40741117=264, srv1958265988=190, srv592380483=303, srv483565354=277, srv1531731329=100, srv359746409=253, srv1271131029=54, srv1007512250=2, srv1783696565=158, srv1284150263=57, srv1648846971=118, srv120365207=40, srv263085176=235, srv535080964=290, srv824739010=357, srv744793832=331, srv1073394883=18, srv1113186104=23, srv1370321362=69, srv328204461=249, srv1604342762=109, srv266460489=237, srv313806624=245, srv1473408823=93, srv865692144=366, srv42814401=265, srv104065318=10, srv1599236554=108, srv1476834435=94, srv1673452142=128, srv716892727=325, srv1501773847=98, srv791504502=346, srv367902453=254, srv254349567=232, srv2126102976=218, srv252714068=231, srv916506189=380, srv687320190=318, srv1000433998=0, srv51396503=281, srv648464134=313, srv908419423=379, srv204022732=200, srv1901650254=177, srv200342397=196, srv765841762=335, srv1849125656=167, srv235281774=226, srv2137298641=224, srv517347076=283, srv1687711069=135, srv800105834=347, srv1609917009=112, srv1038797815=9, srv863216619=365, srv921796978=382, srv895924009=376, srv319002955=246, srv611122413=305, srv1942590787=186, srv529333113=288, srv1053973741=14, srv1988512138=194, srv1037112526=8, srv442327402=268, srv2062351281=204, srv1240518778=48, srv471289019=274, srv1857090224=170, srv1543025253=101, srv1915241294=184, srv238420451=228, srv1747796150=145, srv1101668258=21, srv1437034663=88, srv1173449481=35, srv582652595=301, srv1739043021=144, srv1733173130=143, srv465824154=272, srv14463216=91, srv1720161153=140, srv1549403995=102, srv235920151=227, srv1909060246=179, srv527988350=287, srv1801762669=161, srv89501442=375, srv442994824=269, srv1414012241=83, srv165153258=121, srv1766333515=151, srv2063438865=205, srv1071671801=17, srv1638570398=116, srv1035353226=7, srv1856921753=169, srv1887444158=173, srv1897306674=176, srv1255718022=51, srv1260078897=53, srv1372945218=70, srv1163715139=31, srv175471358=146, srv1558656747=104, srv1463869996=92, srv124825865=49, srv1142495625=26, srv1397803774=77, srv1644508836=117, srv1807320536=162, srv1165273546=32, srv1650978005=120, srv1374260725=71, srv2065239646=206, srv1685737274=134, srv878340336=371, srv329463090=250, srv2112675912=213, srv1378293943=74, srv787532288=343, srv1292867420=59, srv519831391=285, srv1002018470=1, srv822141051=356, srv1229740495=45, srv706370370=321, srv255741565=233, srv1177018836=36, srv1223505925=43, srv745532463=332, srv1820836786=163, srv2127145828=220, srv2124524081=216, srv665150476=316, srv2132621880=223, srv2051928856=203, srv1903063797=178, srv881186303=373, srv1758974023=148, srv270549378=239, srv2014789268=198, srv1663469360=123, srv1331983035=65, srv1768940632=153, srv2084732799=210, srv1043044287=12, srv630246195=309, srv86319792=364, srv37305654=256, srv1650394019=119, srv1888093001=174, srv512441512=280, srv813969264=352, srv277288989=241, srv2017714321=199, srv1410469782=81, srv751917673=333, srv1443060804=89, srv1997063872=195, srv404426071=263, srv1443287861=90, srv695697141=320, srv636958174=310, srv1105584096=22, srv583005569=302, srv92523166=384, srv330226906=251, srv1684865692=133, srv381463497=258, srv567942525=297, srv1010403208=3, srv881516937=374, srv140693587=80, srv1872213858=172, srv262210172=234, srv846799674=358, srv851169364=360, srv880017865=372, srv129190288=58, srv401606217=262, srv669535820=317, srv1325384866=64, srv1377673856=73, srv1416276025=85, srv430431276=266, srv81513922=353, srv2044458062=201, srv2118166427=214, srv1665530216=125, srv2045587532=202, srv1824773168=164, srv2071913725=208, srv1295499145=60, srv1780304939=155, srv612277490=306, srv102508625=6, srv1637539828=115, srv820424989=355, srv50966795=279, srv1950402166=188, srv1207208580=42, srv1057648579=16, srv1084295726=20, srv39165764=260, srv959379519=387, srv2066402828=207, srv1556810592=103, srv1232731779=46, srv1606144164=110, srv1487275322=95, srv519310224=284, srv775221203=338, srv1079168923=19, srv1957834842=189, srv866525142=367, srv243907419=229, srv248553307=230, srv344122075=252, srv467461515=273, srv805609280=349, srv1018507425=4, srv1827511993=166, srv1704639485=137, srv855754935=362, srv1057024901=15, srv1116429721=24, srv927375731=385, srv1383836323=76, srv1584407048=107, srv809779157=351, srv1786622589=159, srv869541705=368, srv1123072042=25, srv1726136626=142, srv135800579=67, srv1958676591=191, srv390748718=259, srv907223095=378, srv76871917=336, srv1160170031=29, srv2119727728=215, srv918100507=381, srv1352063642=66, srv1975716907=193} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:15,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:15,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:15,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:15,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:15,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:15,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:15,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:15,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:15,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:15,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:15,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-17 21:53:15,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-17 21:53:15,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-17 21:53:15,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-17 21:53:15,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-17 21:53:15,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-17 21:53:15,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-17 21:53:15,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-17 21:53:15,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-17 21:53:15,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-17 21:53:15,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-17 21:53:15,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-17 21:53:15,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-17 21:53:15,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-17 21:53:15,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-17 21:53:15,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-17 21:53:15,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-17 21:53:15,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-17 21:53:15,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-17 21:53:15,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-17 21:53:15,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-17 21:53:15,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-17 21:53:15,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-17 21:53:15,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-17 21:53:15,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-17 21:53:15,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-17 21:53:15,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-17 21:53:15,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-17 21:53:15,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-17 21:53:15,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-17 21:53:15,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-17 21:53:15,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-17 21:53:15,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-17 21:53:15,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-17 21:53:15,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-17 21:53:15,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-17 21:53:15,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-17 21:53:15,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-17 21:53:15,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-17 21:53:15,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-17 21:53:15,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-17 21:53:15,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-17 21:53:15,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-17 21:53:15,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-17 21:53:15,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-17 21:53:15,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-17 21:53:15,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-17 21:53:15,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-17 21:53:15,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-17 21:53:15,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-17 21:53:15,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-17 21:53:15,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-17 21:53:15,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-17 21:53:15,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-17 21:53:15,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-17 21:53:15,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-17 21:53:15,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-17 21:53:15,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-17 21:53:15,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-17 21:53:15,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-17 21:53:15,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-17 21:53:15,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-17 21:53:15,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-17 21:53:15,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-17 21:53:15,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-17 21:53:15,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-17 21:53:15,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-17 21:53:15,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-17 21:53:15,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-17 21:53:15,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-17 21:53:15,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-17 21:53:15,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-17 21:53:15,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-17 21:53:15,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-17 21:53:15,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-17 21:53:15,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-17 21:53:15,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-17 21:53:15,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-17 21:53:15,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-17 21:53:15,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-17 21:53:15,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-17 21:53:15,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-17 21:53:15,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-17 21:53:15,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-17 21:53:15,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-17 21:53:15,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-17 21:53:15,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-17 21:53:15,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-17 21:53:15,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-17 21:53:15,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-17 21:53:15,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-17 21:53:15,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-17 21:53:15,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-17 21:53:15,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-17 21:53:15,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-17 21:53:15,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-17 21:53:15,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-17 21:53:15,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-17 21:53:15,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-17 21:53:15,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-17 21:53:15,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-17 21:53:15,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-17 21:53:15,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-17 21:53:15,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-17 21:53:15,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-17 21:53:15,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-17 21:53:15,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-17 21:53:15,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-17 21:53:15,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-17 21:53:15,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-17 21:53:15,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-17 21:53:15,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-17 21:53:15,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-17 21:53:15,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-17 21:53:15,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-17 21:53:15,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-17 21:53:15,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-17 21:53:15,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-17 21:53:15,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-17 21:53:15,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-17 21:53:15,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-17 21:53:15,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-17 21:53:15,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-17 21:53:15,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-17 21:53:15,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-17 21:53:15,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-17 21:53:15,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-17 21:53:15,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-17 21:53:15,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-17 21:53:15,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-17 21:53:15,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-17 21:53:15,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-17 21:53:15,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-17 21:53:15,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-17 21:53:15,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-17 21:53:15,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-17 21:53:15,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-17 21:53:15,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-17 21:53:15,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-17 21:53:15,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-17 21:53:15,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-17 21:53:15,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-17 21:53:15,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-17 21:53:15,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-17 21:53:15,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-17 21:53:15,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-17 21:53:15,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-17 21:53:15,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-17 21:53:15,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-17 21:53:15,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-17 21:53:15,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-17 21:53:15,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-17 21:53:15,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-17 21:53:15,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-17 21:53:15,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-17 21:53:15,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-17 21:53:15,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-17 21:53:15,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-17 21:53:15,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-17 21:53:15,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-17 21:53:15,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-17 21:53:15,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-17 21:53:15,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-17 21:53:15,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-17 21:53:15,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-17 21:53:15,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-17 21:53:15,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-17 21:53:15,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-17 21:53:15,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-17 21:53:15,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-17 21:53:15,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-17 21:53:15,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-17 21:53:15,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-17 21:53:15,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-17 21:53:15,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-17 21:53:15,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-17 21:53:15,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-17 21:53:15,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-17 21:53:15,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-17 21:53:15,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-17 21:53:15,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-17 21:53:15,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-17 21:53:15,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-17 21:53:15,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-17 21:53:15,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-17 21:53:15,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-17 21:53:15,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-17 21:53:15,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-17 21:53:15,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-17 21:53:15,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-17 21:53:15,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-17 21:53:15,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-17 21:53:15,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-17 21:53:15,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-17 21:53:15,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-17 21:53:15,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-17 21:53:15,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-17 21:53:15,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-17 21:53:15,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-17 21:53:15,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-17 21:53:15,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-17 21:53:15,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-17 21:53:15,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-17 21:53:15,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-17 21:53:15,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-17 21:53:15,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-17 21:53:15,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-17 21:53:15,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-17 21:53:15,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-17 21:53:15,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-17 21:53:15,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-17 21:53:15,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-17 21:53:15,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-17 21:53:15,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-17 21:53:15,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-17 21:53:15,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-17 21:53:15,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-17 21:53:15,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-17 21:53:15,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-17 21:53:15,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-17 21:53:15,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-17 21:53:15,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-17 21:53:15,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-17 21:53:15,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-17 21:53:15,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-17 21:53:15,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-17 21:53:15,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-17 21:53:15,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-17 21:53:15,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-17 21:53:15,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-17 21:53:15,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-17 21:53:15,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-17 21:53:15,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-17 21:53:15,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-17 21:53:15,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-17 21:53:15,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-17 21:53:15,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-17 21:53:15,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-17 21:53:15,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-17 21:53:15,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-17 21:53:15,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-17 21:53:15,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-17 21:53:15,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-17 21:53:15,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-17 21:53:15,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-17 21:53:15,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-17 21:53:15,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-17 21:53:15,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-17 21:53:15,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-17 21:53:15,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-17 21:53:15,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-17 21:53:15,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-17 21:53:15,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-17 21:53:15,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-17 21:53:15,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-17 21:53:15,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-17 21:53:15,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-17 21:53:15,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-17 21:53:15,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-17 21:53:15,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-17 21:53:15,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-17 21:53:15,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-17 21:53:15,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-17 21:53:15,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-17 21:53:15,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-17 21:53:15,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-17 21:53:15,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-17 21:53:15,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-17 21:53:15,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-17 21:53:15,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-17 21:53:15,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-17 21:53:15,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-17 21:53:15,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-17 21:53:15,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-17 21:53:15,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-17 21:53:15,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-17 21:53:15,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-17 21:53:15,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-17 21:53:15,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-17 21:53:15,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-17 21:53:15,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-17 21:53:15,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-17 21:53:15,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-17 21:53:15,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-17 21:53:15,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-17 21:53:15,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-17 21:53:15,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-17 21:53:15,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-17 21:53:15,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-17 21:53:15,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-17 21:53:15,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-17 21:53:15,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-17 21:53:15,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-17 21:53:15,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-17 21:53:15,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-17 21:53:15,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-17 21:53:15,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-17 21:53:15,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-17 21:53:15,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-17 21:53:15,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-17 21:53:15,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-17 21:53:15,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-17 21:53:15,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-17 21:53:15,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-17 21:53:15,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-17 21:53:15,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-17 21:53:15,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-17 21:53:15,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-17 21:53:15,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-17 21:53:15,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-17 21:53:15,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-17 21:53:15,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-17 21:53:15,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-17 21:53:15,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-17 21:53:15,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-17 21:53:15,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-17 21:53:15,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-17 21:53:15,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-17 21:53:15,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-17 21:53:15,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-17 21:53:15,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-17 21:53:15,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-17 21:53:15,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-17 21:53:15,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-17 21:53:15,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-17 21:53:15,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-17 21:53:15,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-17 21:53:15,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-17 21:53:15,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-17 21:53:15,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-17 21:53:15,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-17 21:53:15,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-17 21:53:15,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-17 21:53:15,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-17 21:53:15,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-17 21:53:15,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-17 21:53:15,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-17 21:53:15,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-17 21:53:15,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-17 21:53:15,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-17 21:53:15,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-17 21:53:15,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-17 21:53:15,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-17 21:53:15,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-17 21:53:15,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-17 21:53:15,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-17 21:53:15,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-17 21:53:15,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-17 21:53:15,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-17 21:53:15,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-17 21:53:15,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-17 21:53:15,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-17 21:53:15,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-17 21:53:15,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-17 21:53:15,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-17 21:53:15,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-17 21:53:15,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-17 21:53:15,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-17 21:53:15,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-17 21:53:15,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-17 21:53:15,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-17 21:53:15,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-17 21:53:15,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-17 21:53:15,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-17 21:53:15,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-17 21:53:15,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-17 21:53:15,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-17 21:53:15,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-17 21:53:15,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-17 21:53:15,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-17 21:53:15,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-17 21:53:15,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-17 21:53:15,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-17 21:53:15,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-17 21:53:15,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-17 21:53:15,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-17 21:53:15,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-17 21:53:15,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-17 21:53:15,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-17 21:53:15,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-17 21:53:15,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-17 21:53:15,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-17 21:53:15,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-17 21:53:15,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:15,354 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table28) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:15,355 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table29
2023-07-17 21:53:15,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv871358531=369, srv64697211=312, srv653261481=314, srv1778141916=154, srv716510755=323, srv372169288=255, srv568235512=298, srv710229516=322, srv537137712=293, srv1682791519=131, srv642353994=311, srv1046656068=13, srv993792848=391, srv1202667070=39, srv99567927=392, srv1607947050=111, srv1677371877=129, srv1763526149=150, srv1763378353=149, srv531263272=289, srv448398842=270, srv802808934=348, srv77960001=340, srv453521623=271, srv162773041=114, srv563606057=295, srv1659238910=122, srv1279307656=55, srv1914255334=183, srv1296605582=61, srv2131597846=222, srv1375359355=72, srv1405269336=79, srv175680261=147, srv282211488=242, srv1412891098=82, srv375712549=257, srv191234370=182, srv1574132168=106, srv1853511149=168, srv617306884=307, srv268601623=238, srv1400099806=78, srv477381292=275, srv1279442050=56, srv535853198=292, srv1767480590=152, srv2100700333=211, srv1187847151=37, srv791064637=345, srv74478935=330, srv1206084762=41, srv1497856295=97, srv897884865=377, srv398014971=261, srv786136704=342, srv1429879791=86, srv1201763981=38, srv1415213844=84, srv302220908=243, srv156683359=105, srv1974497084=192, srv535358845=291, srv627763604=308, srv732106437=326, srv1679724304=130, srv576770232=299, srv478480013=276, srv1237250370=47, srv1169018295=34, srv32320833=248, srv594880186=304, srv216306370=225, srv656484240=315, srv818754908=354, srv1321058011=63, srv1256345927=52, srv1670847243=126, srv1515243164=99, srv1781378955=156, srv508388209=278, srv1910886192=180, srv1718898730=139, srv772274482=337, srv1433624807=87, srv848605385=359, srv2107957639=212, srv270591905=240, srv2126706298=219, srv2080681743=209, srv1683990934=132, srv11526364=28, srv761020484=334, srv1720507603=141, srv266276730=236, srv935213051=386, srv923440665=383, srv1911104834=181, srv1944131651=187, srv1162841146=30, srv1921230216=185, srv319459319=247, srv1168022226=33, srv57689659=300, srv716533901=324, srv1255156178=50, srv441379967=267, srv806979625=350, srv788255577=344, srv976533744=389, srv1317853355=62, srv1491073587=96, srv777865249=339, srv2130226580=221, srv873230355=370, srv971370780=388, srv2008207413=197, srv989150800=390, srv737980208=328, srv862088563=363, srv1716783669=138, srv1801293056=160, srv1363984373=68, srv515711115=282, srv1378945327=75, srv17002515=136, srv853498273=361, srv1825292480=165, srv2124576425=217, srv1889349340=175, srv527691188=286, srv1226737728=44, srv1781498156=157, srv104267960=11, srv1663644309=124, srv1672213768=127, srv740402944=329, srv555807163=294, srv566277037=296, srv734882045=327, srv1143683685=27, srv1021400966=5, srv694407347=319, srv1626790310=113, srv303328507=244, srv1869166689=171, srv781623755=341, srv40741117=264, srv1958265988=190, srv592380483=303, srv483565354=277, srv1531731329=100, srv359746409=253, srv1271131029=54, srv1007512250=2, srv1783696565=158, srv1284150263=57, srv1648846971=118, srv120365207=40, srv263085176=235, srv535080964=290, srv824739010=357, srv744793832=331, srv1073394883=18, srv1113186104=23, srv1370321362=69, srv328204461=249, srv1604342762=109, srv266460489=237, srv313806624=245, srv1473408823=93, srv865692144=366, srv42814401=265, srv104065318=10, srv1599236554=108, srv1476834435=94, srv1673452142=128, srv716892727=325, srv1501773847=98, srv791504502=346, srv367902453=254, srv254349567=232, srv2126102976=218, srv252714068=231, srv916506189=380, srv687320190=318, srv1000433998=0, srv51396503=281, srv648464134=313, srv908419423=379, srv204022732=200, srv1901650254=177, srv200342397=196, srv765841762=335, srv1849125656=167, srv235281774=226, srv2137298641=224, srv517347076=283, srv1687711069=135, srv800105834=347, srv1609917009=112, srv1038797815=9, srv863216619=365, srv921796978=382, srv895924009=376, srv319002955=246, srv611122413=305, srv1942590787=186, srv529333113=288, srv1053973741=14, srv1988512138=194, srv1037112526=8, srv442327402=268, srv2062351281=204, srv1240518778=48, srv471289019=274, srv1857090224=170, srv1543025253=101, srv1915241294=184, srv238420451=228, srv1747796150=145, srv1101668258=21, srv1437034663=88, srv1173449481=35, srv582652595=301, srv1739043021=144, srv1733173130=143, srv465824154=272, srv14463216=91, srv1720161153=140, srv1549403995=102, srv235920151=227, srv1909060246=179, srv527988350=287, srv1801762669=161, srv89501442=375, srv442994824=269, srv1414012241=83, srv165153258=121, srv1766333515=151, srv2063438865=205, srv1071671801=17, srv1638570398=116, srv1035353226=7, srv1856921753=169, srv1887444158=173, srv1897306674=176, srv1255718022=51, srv1260078897=53, srv1372945218=70, srv1163715139=31, srv175471358=146, srv1558656747=104, srv1463869996=92, srv124825865=49, srv1142495625=26, srv1397803774=77, srv1644508836=117, srv1807320536=162, srv1165273546=32, srv1650978005=120, srv1374260725=71, srv2065239646=206, srv1685737274=134, srv878340336=371, srv329463090=250, srv2112675912=213, srv1378293943=74, srv787532288=343, srv1292867420=59, srv519831391=285, srv1002018470=1, srv822141051=356, srv1229740495=45, srv706370370=321, srv255741565=233, srv1177018836=36, srv1223505925=43, srv745532463=332, srv1820836786=163, srv2127145828=220, srv2124524081=216, srv665150476=316, srv2132621880=223, srv2051928856=203, srv1903063797=178, srv881186303=373, srv1758974023=148, srv270549378=239, srv2014789268=198, srv1663469360=123, srv1331983035=65, srv1768940632=153, srv2084732799=210, srv1043044287=12, srv630246195=309, srv86319792=364, srv37305654=256, srv1650394019=119, srv1888093001=174, srv512441512=280, srv813969264=352, srv277288989=241, srv2017714321=199, srv1410469782=81, srv751917673=333, srv1443060804=89, srv1997063872=195, srv404426071=263, srv1443287861=90, srv695697141=320, srv636958174=310, srv1105584096=22, srv583005569=302, srv92523166=384, srv330226906=251, srv1684865692=133, srv381463497=258, srv567942525=297, srv1010403208=3, srv881516937=374, srv140693587=80, srv1872213858=172, srv262210172=234, srv846799674=358, srv851169364=360, srv880017865=372, srv129190288=58, srv401606217=262, srv669535820=317, srv1325384866=64, srv1377673856=73, srv1416276025=85, srv430431276=266, srv81513922=353, srv2044458062=201, srv2118166427=214, srv1665530216=125, srv2045587532=202, srv1824773168=164, srv2071913725=208, srv1295499145=60, srv1780304939=155, srv612277490=306, srv102508625=6, srv1637539828=115, srv820424989=355, srv50966795=279, srv1950402166=188, srv1207208580=42, srv1057648579=16, srv1084295726=20, srv39165764=260, srv959379519=387, srv2066402828=207, srv1556810592=103, srv1232731779=46, srv1606144164=110, srv1487275322=95, srv519310224=284, srv775221203=338, srv1079168923=19, srv1957834842=189, srv866525142=367, srv243907419=229, srv248553307=230, srv344122075=252, srv467461515=273, srv805609280=349, srv1018507425=4, srv1827511993=166, srv1704639485=137, srv855754935=362, srv1057024901=15, srv1116429721=24, srv927375731=385, srv1383836323=76, srv1584407048=107, srv809779157=351, srv1786622589=159, srv869541705=368, srv1123072042=25, srv1726136626=142, srv135800579=67, srv1958676591=191, srv390748718=259, srv907223095=378, srv76871917=336, srv1160170031=29, srv2119727728=215, srv918100507=381, srv1352063642=66, srv1975716907=193} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:15,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:15,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:15,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:15,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:15,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:15,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:15,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:15,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:15,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:15,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:15,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-17 21:53:15,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-17 21:53:15,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-17 21:53:15,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-17 21:53:15,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-17 21:53:15,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-17 21:53:15,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-17 21:53:15,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-17 21:53:15,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-17 21:53:15,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-17 21:53:15,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-17 21:53:15,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-17 21:53:15,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-17 21:53:15,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-17 21:53:15,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-17 21:53:15,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-17 21:53:15,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-17 21:53:15,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-17 21:53:15,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-17 21:53:15,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-17 21:53:15,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-17 21:53:15,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-17 21:53:15,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-17 21:53:15,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-17 21:53:15,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-17 21:53:15,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-17 21:53:15,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-17 21:53:15,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-17 21:53:15,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-17 21:53:15,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-17 21:53:15,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-17 21:53:15,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-17 21:53:15,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-17 21:53:15,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-17 21:53:15,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-17 21:53:15,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-17 21:53:15,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-17 21:53:15,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-17 21:53:15,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-17 21:53:15,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-17 21:53:15,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-17 21:53:15,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-17 21:53:15,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-17 21:53:15,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-17 21:53:15,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-17 21:53:15,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-17 21:53:15,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-17 21:53:15,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-17 21:53:15,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-17 21:53:15,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-17 21:53:15,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-17 21:53:15,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-17 21:53:15,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-17 21:53:15,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-17 21:53:15,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-17 21:53:15,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-17 21:53:15,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-17 21:53:15,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-17 21:53:15,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-17 21:53:15,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-17 21:53:15,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-17 21:53:15,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-17 21:53:15,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-17 21:53:15,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-17 21:53:15,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-17 21:53:15,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-17 21:53:15,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-17 21:53:15,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-17 21:53:15,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-17 21:53:15,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-17 21:53:15,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-17 21:53:15,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-17 21:53:15,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-17 21:53:15,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-17 21:53:15,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-17 21:53:15,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-17 21:53:15,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-17 21:53:15,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-17 21:53:15,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-17 21:53:15,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-17 21:53:15,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-17 21:53:15,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-17 21:53:15,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-17 21:53:15,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-17 21:53:15,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-17 21:53:15,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-17 21:53:15,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-17 21:53:15,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-17 21:53:15,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-17 21:53:15,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-17 21:53:15,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-17 21:53:15,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-17 21:53:15,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-17 21:53:15,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-17 21:53:15,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-17 21:53:15,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-17 21:53:15,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-17 21:53:15,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-17 21:53:15,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-17 21:53:15,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-17 21:53:15,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-17 21:53:15,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-17 21:53:15,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-17 21:53:15,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-17 21:53:15,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-17 21:53:15,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-17 21:53:15,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-17 21:53:15,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-17 21:53:15,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-17 21:53:15,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-17 21:53:15,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-17 21:53:15,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-17 21:53:15,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-17 21:53:15,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-17 21:53:15,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-17 21:53:15,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-17 21:53:15,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-17 21:53:15,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-17 21:53:15,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-17 21:53:15,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-17 21:53:15,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-17 21:53:15,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-17 21:53:15,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-17 21:53:15,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-17 21:53:15,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-17 21:53:15,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-17 21:53:15,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-17 21:53:15,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-17 21:53:15,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-17 21:53:15,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-17 21:53:15,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-17 21:53:15,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-17 21:53:15,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-17 21:53:15,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-17 21:53:15,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-17 21:53:15,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-17 21:53:15,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-17 21:53:15,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-17 21:53:15,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-17 21:53:15,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-17 21:53:15,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-17 21:53:15,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-17 21:53:15,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-17 21:53:15,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-17 21:53:15,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-17 21:53:15,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-17 21:53:15,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-17 21:53:15,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-17 21:53:15,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-17 21:53:15,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-17 21:53:15,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-17 21:53:15,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-17 21:53:15,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-17 21:53:15,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-17 21:53:15,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-17 21:53:15,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-17 21:53:15,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-17 21:53:15,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-17 21:53:15,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-17 21:53:15,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-17 21:53:15,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-17 21:53:15,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-17 21:53:15,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-17 21:53:15,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-17 21:53:15,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-17 21:53:15,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-17 21:53:15,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-17 21:53:15,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-17 21:53:15,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-17 21:53:15,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-17 21:53:15,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-17 21:53:15,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-17 21:53:15,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-17 21:53:15,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-17 21:53:15,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-17 21:53:15,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-17 21:53:15,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-17 21:53:15,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-17 21:53:15,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-17 21:53:15,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-17 21:53:15,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-17 21:53:15,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-17 21:53:15,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-17 21:53:15,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-17 21:53:15,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-17 21:53:15,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-17 21:53:15,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-17 21:53:15,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-17 21:53:15,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-17 21:53:15,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-17 21:53:15,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-17 21:53:15,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-17 21:53:15,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-17 21:53:15,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-17 21:53:15,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-17 21:53:15,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-17 21:53:15,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-17 21:53:15,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-17 21:53:15,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-17 21:53:15,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-17 21:53:15,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-17 21:53:15,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-17 21:53:15,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-17 21:53:15,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-17 21:53:15,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-17 21:53:15,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-17 21:53:15,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-17 21:53:15,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-17 21:53:15,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-17 21:53:15,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-17 21:53:15,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-17 21:53:15,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-17 21:53:15,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-17 21:53:15,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-17 21:53:15,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-17 21:53:15,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-17 21:53:15,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-17 21:53:15,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-17 21:53:15,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-17 21:53:15,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-17 21:53:15,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-17 21:53:15,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-17 21:53:15,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-17 21:53:15,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-17 21:53:15,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-17 21:53:15,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-17 21:53:15,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-17 21:53:15,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-17 21:53:15,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-17 21:53:15,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-17 21:53:15,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-17 21:53:15,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-17 21:53:15,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-17 21:53:15,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-17 21:53:15,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-17 21:53:15,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-17 21:53:15,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-17 21:53:15,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-17 21:53:15,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-17 21:53:15,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-17 21:53:15,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-17 21:53:15,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-17 21:53:15,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-17 21:53:15,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-17 21:53:15,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-17 21:53:15,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-17 21:53:15,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-17 21:53:15,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-17 21:53:15,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-17 21:53:15,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-17 21:53:15,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-17 21:53:15,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-17 21:53:15,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-17 21:53:15,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-17 21:53:15,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-17 21:53:15,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-17 21:53:15,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-17 21:53:15,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-17 21:53:15,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-17 21:53:15,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-17 21:53:15,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-17 21:53:15,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-17 21:53:15,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-17 21:53:15,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-17 21:53:15,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-17 21:53:15,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-17 21:53:15,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-17 21:53:15,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-17 21:53:15,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-17 21:53:15,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-17 21:53:15,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-17 21:53:15,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-17 21:53:15,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-17 21:53:15,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-17 21:53:15,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-17 21:53:15,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-17 21:53:15,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-17 21:53:15,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-17 21:53:15,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-17 21:53:15,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-17 21:53:15,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-17 21:53:15,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-17 21:53:15,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-17 21:53:15,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-17 21:53:15,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-17 21:53:15,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-17 21:53:15,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-17 21:53:15,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-17 21:53:15,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-17 21:53:15,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-17 21:53:15,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-17 21:53:15,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-17 21:53:15,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-17 21:53:15,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-17 21:53:15,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-17 21:53:15,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-17 21:53:15,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-17 21:53:15,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-17 21:53:15,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-17 21:53:15,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-17 21:53:15,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-17 21:53:15,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-17 21:53:15,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-17 21:53:15,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-17 21:53:15,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-17 21:53:15,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-17 21:53:15,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-17 21:53:15,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-17 21:53:15,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-17 21:53:15,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-17 21:53:15,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-17 21:53:15,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-17 21:53:15,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-17 21:53:15,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-17 21:53:15,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-17 21:53:15,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-17 21:53:15,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-17 21:53:15,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-17 21:53:15,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-17 21:53:15,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-17 21:53:15,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-17 21:53:15,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-17 21:53:15,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-17 21:53:15,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-17 21:53:15,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-17 21:53:15,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-17 21:53:15,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-17 21:53:15,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-17 21:53:15,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-17 21:53:15,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-17 21:53:15,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-17 21:53:15,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-17 21:53:15,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-17 21:53:15,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-17 21:53:15,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-17 21:53:15,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-17 21:53:15,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-17 21:53:15,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-17 21:53:15,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-17 21:53:15,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-17 21:53:15,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-17 21:53:15,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-17 21:53:15,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-17 21:53:15,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-17 21:53:15,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-17 21:53:15,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-17 21:53:15,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-17 21:53:15,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-17 21:53:15,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-17 21:53:15,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-17 21:53:15,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-17 21:53:15,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-17 21:53:15,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-17 21:53:15,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-17 21:53:15,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-17 21:53:15,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-17 21:53:15,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-17 21:53:15,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-17 21:53:15,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-17 21:53:15,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-17 21:53:15,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-17 21:53:15,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-17 21:53:15,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-17 21:53:15,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-17 21:53:15,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-17 21:53:15,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-17 21:53:15,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-17 21:53:15,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-17 21:53:15,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-17 21:53:15,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-17 21:53:15,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-17 21:53:15,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-17 21:53:15,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-17 21:53:15,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-17 21:53:15,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-17 21:53:15,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-17 21:53:15,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-17 21:53:15,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-17 21:53:15,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-17 21:53:15,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-17 21:53:15,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-17 21:53:15,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-17 21:53:15,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-17 21:53:15,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:15,369 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table29) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:15,369 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table20
2023-07-17 21:53:15,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv871358531=369, srv64697211=312, srv653261481=314, srv1778141916=154, srv716510755=323, srv372169288=255, srv568235512=298, srv710229516=322, srv537137712=293, srv1682791519=131, srv642353994=311, srv1046656068=13, srv993792848=391, srv1202667070=39, srv99567927=392, srv1607947050=111, srv1677371877=129, srv1763526149=150, srv1763378353=149, srv531263272=289, srv448398842=270, srv802808934=348, srv77960001=340, srv453521623=271, srv162773041=114, srv563606057=295, srv1659238910=122, srv1279307656=55, srv1914255334=183, srv1296605582=61, srv2131597846=222, srv1375359355=72, srv1405269336=79, srv175680261=147, srv282211488=242, srv1412891098=82, srv375712549=257, srv191234370=182, srv1574132168=106, srv1853511149=168, srv617306884=307, srv268601623=238, srv1400099806=78, srv477381292=275, srv1279442050=56, srv535853198=292, srv1767480590=152, srv2100700333=211, srv1187847151=37, srv791064637=345, srv74478935=330, srv1206084762=41, srv1497856295=97, srv897884865=377, srv398014971=261, srv786136704=342, srv1429879791=86, srv1201763981=38, srv1415213844=84, srv302220908=243, srv156683359=105, srv1974497084=192, srv535358845=291, srv627763604=308, srv732106437=326, srv1679724304=130, srv576770232=299, srv478480013=276, srv1237250370=47, srv1169018295=34, srv32320833=248, srv594880186=304, srv216306370=225, srv656484240=315, srv818754908=354, srv1321058011=63, srv1256345927=52, srv1670847243=126, srv1515243164=99, srv1781378955=156, srv508388209=278, srv1910886192=180, srv1718898730=139, srv772274482=337, srv1433624807=87, srv848605385=359, srv2107957639=212, srv270591905=240, srv2126706298=219, srv2080681743=209, srv1683990934=132, srv11526364=28, srv761020484=334, srv1720507603=141, srv266276730=236, srv935213051=386, srv923440665=383, srv1911104834=181, srv1944131651=187, srv1162841146=30, srv1921230216=185, srv319459319=247, srv1168022226=33, srv57689659=300, srv716533901=324, srv1255156178=50, srv441379967=267, srv806979625=350, srv788255577=344, srv976533744=389, srv1317853355=62, srv1491073587=96, srv777865249=339, srv2130226580=221, srv873230355=370, srv971370780=388, srv2008207413=197, srv989150800=390, srv737980208=328, srv862088563=363, srv1716783669=138, srv1801293056=160, srv1363984373=68, srv515711115=282, srv1378945327=75, srv17002515=136, srv853498273=361, srv1825292480=165, srv2124576425=217, srv1889349340=175, srv527691188=286, srv1226737728=44, srv1781498156=157, srv104267960=11, srv1663644309=124, srv1672213768=127, srv740402944=329, srv555807163=294, srv566277037=296, srv734882045=327, srv1143683685=27, srv1021400966=5, srv694407347=319, srv1626790310=113, srv303328507=244, srv1869166689=171, srv781623755=341, srv40741117=264, srv1958265988=190, srv592380483=303, srv483565354=277, srv1531731329=100, srv359746409=253, srv1271131029=54, srv1007512250=2, srv1783696565=158, srv1284150263=57, srv1648846971=118, srv120365207=40, srv263085176=235, srv535080964=290, srv824739010=357, srv744793832=331, srv1073394883=18, srv1113186104=23, srv1370321362=69, srv328204461=249, srv1604342762=109, srv266460489=237, srv313806624=245, srv1473408823=93, srv865692144=366, srv42814401=265, srv104065318=10, srv1599236554=108, srv1476834435=94, srv1673452142=128, srv716892727=325, srv1501773847=98, srv791504502=346, srv367902453=254, srv254349567=232, srv2126102976=218, srv252714068=231, srv916506189=380, srv687320190=318, srv1000433998=0, srv51396503=281, srv648464134=313, srv908419423=379, srv204022732=200, srv1901650254=177, srv200342397=196, srv765841762=335, srv1849125656=167, srv235281774=226, srv2137298641=224, srv517347076=283, srv1687711069=135, srv800105834=347, srv1609917009=112, srv1038797815=9, srv863216619=365, srv921796978=382, srv895924009=376, srv319002955=246, srv611122413=305, srv1942590787=186, srv529333113=288, srv1053973741=14, srv1988512138=194, srv1037112526=8, srv442327402=268, srv2062351281=204, srv1240518778=48, srv471289019=274, srv1857090224=170, srv1543025253=101, srv1915241294=184, srv238420451=228, srv1747796150=145, srv1101668258=21, srv1437034663=88, srv1173449481=35, srv582652595=301, srv1739043021=144, srv1733173130=143, srv465824154=272, srv14463216=91, srv1720161153=140, srv1549403995=102, srv235920151=227, srv1909060246=179, srv527988350=287, srv1801762669=161, srv89501442=375, srv442994824=269, srv1414012241=83, srv165153258=121, srv1766333515=151, srv2063438865=205, srv1071671801=17, srv1638570398=116, srv1035353226=7, srv1856921753=169, srv1887444158=173, srv1897306674=176, srv1255718022=51, srv1260078897=53, srv1372945218=70, srv1163715139=31, srv175471358=146, srv1558656747=104, srv1463869996=92, srv124825865=49, srv1142495625=26, srv1397803774=77, srv1644508836=117, srv1807320536=162, srv1165273546=32, srv1650978005=120, srv1374260725=71, srv2065239646=206, srv1685737274=134, srv878340336=371, srv329463090=250, srv2112675912=213, srv1378293943=74, srv787532288=343, srv1292867420=59, srv519831391=285, srv1002018470=1, srv822141051=356, srv1229740495=45, srv706370370=321, srv255741565=233, srv1177018836=36, srv1223505925=43, srv745532463=332, srv1820836786=163, srv2127145828=220, srv2124524081=216, srv665150476=316, srv2132621880=223, srv2051928856=203, srv1903063797=178, srv881186303=373, srv1758974023=148, srv270549378=239, srv2014789268=198, srv1663469360=123, srv1331983035=65, srv1768940632=153, srv2084732799=210, srv1043044287=12, srv630246195=309, srv86319792=364, srv37305654=256, srv1650394019=119, srv1888093001=174, srv512441512=280, srv813969264=352, srv277288989=241, srv2017714321=199, srv1410469782=81, srv751917673=333, srv1443060804=89, srv1997063872=195, srv404426071=263, srv1443287861=90, srv695697141=320, srv636958174=310, srv1105584096=22, srv583005569=302, srv92523166=384, srv330226906=251, srv1684865692=133, srv381463497=258, srv567942525=297, srv1010403208=3, srv881516937=374, srv140693587=80, srv1872213858=172, srv262210172=234, srv846799674=358, srv851169364=360, srv880017865=372, srv129190288=58, srv401606217=262, srv669535820=317, srv1325384866=64, srv1377673856=73, srv1416276025=85, srv430431276=266, srv81513922=353, srv2044458062=201, srv2118166427=214, srv1665530216=125, srv2045587532=202, srv1824773168=164, srv2071913725=208, srv1295499145=60, srv1780304939=155, srv612277490=306, srv102508625=6, srv1637539828=115, srv820424989=355, srv50966795=279, srv1950402166=188, srv1207208580=42, srv1057648579=16, srv1084295726=20, srv39165764=260, srv959379519=387, srv2066402828=207, srv1556810592=103, srv1232731779=46, srv1606144164=110, srv1487275322=95, srv519310224=284, srv775221203=338, srv1079168923=19, srv1957834842=189, srv866525142=367, srv243907419=229, srv248553307=230, srv344122075=252, srv467461515=273, srv805609280=349, srv1018507425=4, srv1827511993=166, srv1704639485=137, srv855754935=362, srv1057024901=15, srv1116429721=24, srv927375731=385, srv1383836323=76, srv1584407048=107, srv809779157=351, srv1786622589=159, srv869541705=368, srv1123072042=25, srv1726136626=142, srv135800579=67, srv1958676591=191, srv390748718=259, srv907223095=378, srv76871917=336, srv1160170031=29, srv2119727728=215, srv918100507=381, srv1352063642=66, srv1975716907=193} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:15,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:15,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:15,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:15,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:15,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:15,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:15,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:15,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:15,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:15,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:15,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-17 21:53:15,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-17 21:53:15,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-17 21:53:15,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-17 21:53:15,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-17 21:53:15,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-17 21:53:15,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-17 21:53:15,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-17 21:53:15,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-17 21:53:15,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-17 21:53:15,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-17 21:53:15,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-17 21:53:15,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-17 21:53:15,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-17 21:53:15,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-17 21:53:15,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-17 21:53:15,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-17 21:53:15,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-17 21:53:15,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-17 21:53:15,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-17 21:53:15,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-17 21:53:15,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-17 21:53:15,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-17 21:53:15,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-17 21:53:15,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-17 21:53:15,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-17 21:53:15,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-17 21:53:15,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-17 21:53:15,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-17 21:53:15,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-17 21:53:15,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-17 21:53:15,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-17 21:53:15,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-17 21:53:15,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-17 21:53:15,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-17 21:53:15,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-17 21:53:15,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-17 21:53:15,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-17 21:53:15,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-17 21:53:15,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-17 21:53:15,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-17 21:53:15,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-17 21:53:15,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-17 21:53:15,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-17 21:53:15,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-17 21:53:15,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-17 21:53:15,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-17 21:53:15,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-17 21:53:15,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-17 21:53:15,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-17 21:53:15,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-17 21:53:15,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-17 21:53:15,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-17 21:53:15,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-17 21:53:15,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-17 21:53:15,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-17 21:53:15,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-17 21:53:15,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-17 21:53:15,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-17 21:53:15,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-17 21:53:15,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-17 21:53:15,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-17 21:53:15,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-17 21:53:15,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-17 21:53:15,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-17 21:53:15,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-17 21:53:15,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-17 21:53:15,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-17 21:53:15,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-17 21:53:15,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-17 21:53:15,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-17 21:53:15,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-17 21:53:15,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-17 21:53:15,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-17 21:53:15,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-17 21:53:15,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-17 21:53:15,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-17 21:53:15,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-17 21:53:15,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-17 21:53:15,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-17 21:53:15,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-17 21:53:15,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-17 21:53:15,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-17 21:53:15,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-17 21:53:15,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-17 21:53:15,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-17 21:53:15,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-17 21:53:15,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-17 21:53:15,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-17 21:53:15,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-17 21:53:15,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-17 21:53:15,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-17 21:53:15,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-17 21:53:15,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-17 21:53:15,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-17 21:53:15,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-17 21:53:15,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-17 21:53:15,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-17 21:53:15,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-17 21:53:15,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-17 21:53:15,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-17 21:53:15,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-17 21:53:15,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-17 21:53:15,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-17 21:53:15,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-17 21:53:15,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-17 21:53:15,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-17 21:53:15,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-17 21:53:15,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-17 21:53:15,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-17 21:53:15,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-17 21:53:15,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-17 21:53:15,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-17 21:53:15,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-17 21:53:15,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-17 21:53:15,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-17 21:53:15,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-17 21:53:15,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-17 21:53:15,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-17 21:53:15,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-17 21:53:15,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-17 21:53:15,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-17 21:53:15,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-17 21:53:15,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-17 21:53:15,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-17 21:53:15,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-17 21:53:15,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-17 21:53:15,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-17 21:53:15,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-17 21:53:15,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-17 21:53:15,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-17 21:53:15,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-17 21:53:15,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-17 21:53:15,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-17 21:53:15,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-17 21:53:15,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-17 21:53:15,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-17 21:53:15,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-17 21:53:15,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-17 21:53:15,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-17 21:53:15,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-17 21:53:15,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-17 21:53:15,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-17 21:53:15,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-17 21:53:15,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-17 21:53:15,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-17 21:53:15,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-17 21:53:15,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-17 21:53:15,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-17 21:53:15,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-17 21:53:15,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-17 21:53:15,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-17 21:53:15,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-17 21:53:15,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-17 21:53:15,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-17 21:53:15,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-17 21:53:15,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-17 21:53:15,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-17 21:53:15,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-17 21:53:15,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-17 21:53:15,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-17 21:53:15,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-17 21:53:15,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-17 21:53:15,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-17 21:53:15,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-17 21:53:15,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-17 21:53:15,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-17 21:53:15,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-17 21:53:15,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-17 21:53:15,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-17 21:53:15,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-17 21:53:15,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-17 21:53:15,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-17 21:53:15,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-17 21:53:15,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-17 21:53:15,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-17 21:53:15,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-17 21:53:15,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-17 21:53:15,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-17 21:53:15,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-17 21:53:15,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-17 21:53:15,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-17 21:53:15,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-17 21:53:15,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-17 21:53:15,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-17 21:53:15,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-17 21:53:15,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-17 21:53:15,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-17 21:53:15,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-17 21:53:15,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-17 21:53:15,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-17 21:53:15,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-17 21:53:15,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-17 21:53:15,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-17 21:53:15,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-17 21:53:15,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-17 21:53:15,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-17 21:53:15,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-17 21:53:15,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-17 21:53:15,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-17 21:53:15,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-17 21:53:15,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-17 21:53:15,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-17 21:53:15,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-17 21:53:15,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-17 21:53:15,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-17 21:53:15,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-17 21:53:15,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-17 21:53:15,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-17 21:53:15,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-17 21:53:15,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-17 21:53:15,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-17 21:53:15,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-17 21:53:15,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-17 21:53:15,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-17 21:53:15,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-17 21:53:15,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-17 21:53:15,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-17 21:53:15,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-17 21:53:15,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-17 21:53:15,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-17 21:53:15,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-17 21:53:15,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-17 21:53:15,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-17 21:53:15,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-17 21:53:15,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-17 21:53:15,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-17 21:53:15,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-17 21:53:15,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-17 21:53:15,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-17 21:53:15,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-17 21:53:15,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-17 21:53:15,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-17 21:53:15,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-17 21:53:15,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-17 21:53:15,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-17 21:53:15,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-17 21:53:15,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-17 21:53:15,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-17 21:53:15,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-17 21:53:15,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-17 21:53:15,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-17 21:53:15,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-17 21:53:15,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-17 21:53:15,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-17 21:53:15,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-17 21:53:15,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-17 21:53:15,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-17 21:53:15,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-17 21:53:15,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-17 21:53:15,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-17 21:53:15,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-17 21:53:15,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-17 21:53:15,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-17 21:53:15,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-17 21:53:15,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-17 21:53:15,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-17 21:53:15,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-17 21:53:15,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-17 21:53:15,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-17 21:53:15,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-17 21:53:15,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-17 21:53:15,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-17 21:53:15,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-17 21:53:15,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-17 21:53:15,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-17 21:53:15,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-17 21:53:15,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-17 21:53:15,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-17 21:53:15,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-17 21:53:15,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-17 21:53:15,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-17 21:53:15,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-17 21:53:15,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-17 21:53:15,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-17 21:53:15,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-17 21:53:15,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-17 21:53:15,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-17 21:53:15,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-17 21:53:15,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-17 21:53:15,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-17 21:53:15,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-17 21:53:15,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-17 21:53:15,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-17 21:53:15,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-17 21:53:15,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-17 21:53:15,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-17 21:53:15,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-17 21:53:15,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-17 21:53:15,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-17 21:53:15,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-17 21:53:15,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-17 21:53:15,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-17 21:53:15,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-17 21:53:15,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-17 21:53:15,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-17 21:53:15,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-17 21:53:15,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-17 21:53:15,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-17 21:53:15,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-17 21:53:15,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-17 21:53:15,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-17 21:53:15,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-17 21:53:15,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-17 21:53:15,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-17 21:53:15,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-17 21:53:15,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-17 21:53:15,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-17 21:53:15,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-17 21:53:15,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-17 21:53:15,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-17 21:53:15,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-17 21:53:15,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-17 21:53:15,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-17 21:53:15,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-17 21:53:15,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-17 21:53:15,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-17 21:53:15,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-17 21:53:15,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-17 21:53:15,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-17 21:53:15,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-17 21:53:15,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-17 21:53:15,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-17 21:53:15,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-17 21:53:15,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-17 21:53:15,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-17 21:53:15,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-17 21:53:15,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-17 21:53:15,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-17 21:53:15,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-17 21:53:15,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-17 21:53:15,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-17 21:53:15,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-17 21:53:15,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-17 21:53:15,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-17 21:53:15,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-17 21:53:15,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-17 21:53:15,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-17 21:53:15,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-17 21:53:15,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-17 21:53:15,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-17 21:53:15,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-17 21:53:15,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-17 21:53:15,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-17 21:53:15,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-17 21:53:15,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-17 21:53:15,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-17 21:53:15,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-17 21:53:15,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-17 21:53:15,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-17 21:53:15,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-17 21:53:15,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-17 21:53:15,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-17 21:53:15,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-17 21:53:15,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-17 21:53:15,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-17 21:53:15,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-17 21:53:15,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-17 21:53:15,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-17 21:53:15,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-17 21:53:15,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-17 21:53:15,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-17 21:53:15,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-17 21:53:15,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-17 21:53:15,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-17 21:53:15,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-17 21:53:15,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-17 21:53:15,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-17 21:53:15,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-17 21:53:15,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-17 21:53:15,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-17 21:53:15,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-17 21:53:15,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-17 21:53:15,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-17 21:53:15,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-17 21:53:15,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-17 21:53:15,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-17 21:53:15,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-17 21:53:15,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-17 21:53:15,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-17 21:53:15,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-17 21:53:15,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-17 21:53:15,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-17 21:53:15,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:15,385 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table20) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:15,385 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table21
2023-07-17 21:53:15,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv871358531=369, srv64697211=312, srv653261481=314, srv1778141916=154, srv716510755=323, srv372169288=255, srv568235512=298, srv710229516=322, srv537137712=293, srv1682791519=131, srv642353994=311, srv1046656068=13, srv993792848=391, srv1202667070=39, srv99567927=392, srv1607947050=111, srv1677371877=129, srv1763526149=150, srv1763378353=149, srv531263272=289, srv448398842=270, srv802808934=348, srv77960001=340, srv453521623=271, srv162773041=114, srv563606057=295, srv1659238910=122, srv1279307656=55, srv1914255334=183, srv1296605582=61, srv2131597846=222, srv1375359355=72, srv1405269336=79, srv175680261=147, srv282211488=242, srv1412891098=82, srv375712549=257, srv191234370=182, srv1574132168=106, srv1853511149=168, srv617306884=307, srv268601623=238, srv1400099806=78, srv477381292=275, srv1279442050=56, srv535853198=292, srv1767480590=152, srv2100700333=211, srv1187847151=37, srv791064637=345, srv74478935=330, srv1206084762=41, srv1497856295=97, srv897884865=377, srv398014971=261, srv786136704=342, srv1429879791=86, srv1201763981=38, srv1415213844=84, srv302220908=243, srv156683359=105, srv1974497084=192, srv535358845=291, srv627763604=308, srv732106437=326, srv1679724304=130, srv576770232=299, srv478480013=276, srv1237250370=47, srv1169018295=34, srv32320833=248, srv594880186=304, srv216306370=225, srv656484240=315, srv818754908=354, srv1321058011=63, srv1256345927=52, srv1670847243=126, srv1515243164=99, srv1781378955=156, srv508388209=278, srv1910886192=180, srv1718898730=139, srv772274482=337, srv1433624807=87, srv848605385=359, srv2107957639=212, srv270591905=240, srv2126706298=219, srv2080681743=209, srv1683990934=132, srv11526364=28, srv761020484=334, srv1720507603=141, srv266276730=236, srv935213051=386, srv923440665=383, srv1911104834=181, srv1944131651=187, srv1162841146=30, srv1921230216=185, srv319459319=247, srv1168022226=33, srv57689659=300, srv716533901=324, srv1255156178=50, srv441379967=267, srv806979625=350, srv788255577=344, srv976533744=389, srv1317853355=62, srv1491073587=96, srv777865249=339, srv2130226580=221, srv873230355=370, srv971370780=388, srv2008207413=197, srv989150800=390, srv737980208=328, srv862088563=363, srv1716783669=138, srv1801293056=160, srv1363984373=68, srv515711115=282, srv1378945327=75, srv17002515=136, srv853498273=361, srv1825292480=165, srv2124576425=217, srv1889349340=175, srv527691188=286, srv1226737728=44, srv1781498156=157, srv104267960=11, srv1663644309=124, srv1672213768=127, srv740402944=329, srv555807163=294, srv566277037=296, srv734882045=327, srv1143683685=27, srv1021400966=5, srv694407347=319, srv1626790310=113, srv303328507=244, srv1869166689=171, srv781623755=341, srv40741117=264, srv1958265988=190, srv592380483=303, srv483565354=277, srv1531731329=100, srv359746409=253, srv1271131029=54, srv1007512250=2, srv1783696565=158, srv1284150263=57, srv1648846971=118, srv120365207=40, srv263085176=235, srv535080964=290, srv824739010=357, srv744793832=331, srv1073394883=18, srv1113186104=23, srv1370321362=69, srv328204461=249, srv1604342762=109, srv266460489=237, srv313806624=245, srv1473408823=93, srv865692144=366, srv42814401=265, srv104065318=10, srv1599236554=108, srv1476834435=94, srv1673452142=128, srv716892727=325, srv1501773847=98, srv791504502=346, srv367902453=254, srv254349567=232, srv2126102976=218, srv252714068=231, srv916506189=380, srv687320190=318, srv1000433998=0, srv51396503=281, srv648464134=313, srv908419423=379, srv204022732=200, srv1901650254=177, srv200342397=196, srv765841762=335, srv1849125656=167, srv235281774=226, srv2137298641=224, srv517347076=283, srv1687711069=135, srv800105834=347, srv1609917009=112, srv1038797815=9, srv863216619=365, srv921796978=382, srv895924009=376, srv319002955=246, srv611122413=305, srv1942590787=186, srv529333113=288, srv1053973741=14, srv1988512138=194, srv1037112526=8, srv442327402=268, srv2062351281=204, srv1240518778=48, srv471289019=274, srv1857090224=170, srv1543025253=101, srv1915241294=184, srv238420451=228, srv1747796150=145, srv1101668258=21, srv1437034663=88, srv1173449481=35, srv582652595=301, srv1739043021=144, srv1733173130=143, srv465824154=272, srv14463216=91, srv1720161153=140, srv1549403995=102, srv235920151=227, srv1909060246=179, srv527988350=287, srv1801762669=161, srv89501442=375, srv442994824=269, srv1414012241=83, srv165153258=121, srv1766333515=151, srv2063438865=205, srv1071671801=17, srv1638570398=116, srv1035353226=7, srv1856921753=169, srv1887444158=173, srv1897306674=176, srv1255718022=51, srv1260078897=53, srv1372945218=70, srv1163715139=31, srv175471358=146, srv1558656747=104, srv1463869996=92, srv124825865=49, srv1142495625=26, srv1397803774=77, srv1644508836=117, srv1807320536=162, srv1165273546=32, srv1650978005=120, srv1374260725=71, srv2065239646=206, srv1685737274=134, srv878340336=371, srv329463090=250, srv2112675912=213, srv1378293943=74, srv787532288=343, srv1292867420=59, srv519831391=285, srv1002018470=1, srv822141051=356, srv1229740495=45, srv706370370=321, srv255741565=233, srv1177018836=36, srv1223505925=43, srv745532463=332, srv1820836786=163, srv2127145828=220, srv2124524081=216, srv665150476=316, srv2132621880=223, srv2051928856=203, srv1903063797=178, srv881186303=373, srv1758974023=148, srv270549378=239, srv2014789268=198, srv1663469360=123, srv1331983035=65, srv1768940632=153, srv2084732799=210, srv1043044287=12, srv630246195=309, srv86319792=364, srv37305654=256, srv1650394019=119, srv1888093001=174, srv512441512=280, srv813969264=352, srv277288989=241, srv2017714321=199, srv1410469782=81, srv751917673=333, srv1443060804=89, srv1997063872=195, srv404426071=263, srv1443287861=90, srv695697141=320, srv636958174=310, srv1105584096=22, srv583005569=302, srv92523166=384, srv330226906=251, srv1684865692=133, srv381463497=258, srv567942525=297, srv1010403208=3, srv881516937=374, srv140693587=80, srv1872213858=172, srv262210172=234, srv846799674=358, srv851169364=360, srv880017865=372, srv129190288=58, srv401606217=262, srv669535820=317, srv1325384866=64, srv1377673856=73, srv1416276025=85, srv430431276=266, srv81513922=353, srv2044458062=201, srv2118166427=214, srv1665530216=125, srv2045587532=202, srv1824773168=164, srv2071913725=208, srv1295499145=60, srv1780304939=155, srv612277490=306, srv102508625=6, srv1637539828=115, srv820424989=355, srv50966795=279, srv1950402166=188, srv1207208580=42, srv1057648579=16, srv1084295726=20, srv39165764=260, srv959379519=387, srv2066402828=207, srv1556810592=103, srv1232731779=46, srv1606144164=110, srv1487275322=95, srv519310224=284, srv775221203=338, srv1079168923=19, srv1957834842=189, srv866525142=367, srv243907419=229, srv248553307=230, srv344122075=252, srv467461515=273, srv805609280=349, srv1018507425=4, srv1827511993=166, srv1704639485=137, srv855754935=362, srv1057024901=15, srv1116429721=24, srv927375731=385, srv1383836323=76, srv1584407048=107, srv809779157=351, srv1786622589=159, srv869541705=368, srv1123072042=25, srv1726136626=142, srv135800579=67, srv1958676591=191, srv390748718=259, srv907223095=378, srv76871917=336, srv1160170031=29, srv2119727728=215, srv918100507=381, srv1352063642=66, srv1975716907=193} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:15,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:15,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:15,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:15,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:15,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:15,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:15,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:15,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:15,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:15,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:15,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-17 21:53:15,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-17 21:53:15,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-17 21:53:15,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-17 21:53:15,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-17 21:53:15,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-17 21:53:15,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-17 21:53:15,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-17 21:53:15,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-17 21:53:15,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-17 21:53:15,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-17 21:53:15,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-17 21:53:15,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-17 21:53:15,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-17 21:53:15,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-17 21:53:15,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-17 21:53:15,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-17 21:53:15,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-17 21:53:15,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-17 21:53:15,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-17 21:53:15,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-17 21:53:15,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-17 21:53:15,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-17 21:53:15,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-17 21:53:15,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-17 21:53:15,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-17 21:53:15,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-17 21:53:15,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-17 21:53:15,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-17 21:53:15,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-17 21:53:15,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-17 21:53:15,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-17 21:53:15,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-17 21:53:15,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-17 21:53:15,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-17 21:53:15,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-17 21:53:15,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-17 21:53:15,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-17 21:53:15,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-17 21:53:15,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-17 21:53:15,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-17 21:53:15,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-17 21:53:15,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-17 21:53:15,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-17 21:53:15,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-17 21:53:15,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-17 21:53:15,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-17 21:53:15,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-17 21:53:15,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-17 21:53:15,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-17 21:53:15,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-17 21:53:15,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-17 21:53:15,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-17 21:53:15,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-17 21:53:15,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-17 21:53:15,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-17 21:53:15,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-17 21:53:15,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-17 21:53:15,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-17 21:53:15,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-17 21:53:15,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-17 21:53:15,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-17 21:53:15,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-17 21:53:15,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-17 21:53:15,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-17 21:53:15,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-17 21:53:15,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-17 21:53:15,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-17 21:53:15,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-17 21:53:15,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-17 21:53:15,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-17 21:53:15,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-17 21:53:15,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-17 21:53:15,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-17 21:53:15,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-17 21:53:15,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-17 21:53:15,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-17 21:53:15,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-17 21:53:15,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-17 21:53:15,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-17 21:53:15,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-17 21:53:15,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-17 21:53:15,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-17 21:53:15,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-17 21:53:15,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-17 21:53:15,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-17 21:53:15,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-17 21:53:15,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-17 21:53:15,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-17 21:53:15,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-17 21:53:15,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-17 21:53:15,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-17 21:53:15,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-17 21:53:15,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-17 21:53:15,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-17 21:53:15,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-17 21:53:15,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-17 21:53:15,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-17 21:53:15,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-17 21:53:15,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-17 21:53:15,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-17 21:53:15,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-17 21:53:15,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-17 21:53:15,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-17 21:53:15,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-17 21:53:15,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-17 21:53:15,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-17 21:53:15,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-17 21:53:15,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-17 21:53:15,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-17 21:53:15,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-17 21:53:15,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-17 21:53:15,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-17 21:53:15,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-17 21:53:15,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-17 21:53:15,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-17 21:53:15,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-17 21:53:15,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-17 21:53:15,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-17 21:53:15,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-17 21:53:15,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-17 21:53:15,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-17 21:53:15,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-17 21:53:15,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-17 21:53:15,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-17 21:53:15,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-17 21:53:15,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-17 21:53:15,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-17 21:53:15,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-17 21:53:15,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-17 21:53:15,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-17 21:53:15,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-17 21:53:15,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-17 21:53:15,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-17 21:53:15,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-17 21:53:15,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-17 21:53:15,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-17 21:53:15,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-17 21:53:15,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-17 21:53:15,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-17 21:53:15,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-17 21:53:15,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-17 21:53:15,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-17 21:53:15,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-17 21:53:15,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-17 21:53:15,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-17 21:53:15,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-17 21:53:15,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-17 21:53:15,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-17 21:53:15,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-17 21:53:15,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-17 21:53:15,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-17 21:53:15,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-17 21:53:15,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-17 21:53:15,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-17 21:53:15,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-17 21:53:15,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-17 21:53:15,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-17 21:53:15,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-17 21:53:15,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-17 21:53:15,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-17 21:53:15,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-17 21:53:15,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-17 21:53:15,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-17 21:53:15,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-17 21:53:15,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-17 21:53:15,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-17 21:53:15,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-17 21:53:15,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-17 21:53:15,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-17 21:53:15,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-17 21:53:15,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-17 21:53:15,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-17 21:53:15,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-17 21:53:15,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-17 21:53:15,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-17 21:53:15,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-17 21:53:15,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-17 21:53:15,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-17 21:53:15,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-17 21:53:15,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-17 21:53:15,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-17 21:53:15,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-17 21:53:15,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-17 21:53:15,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-17 21:53:15,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-17 21:53:15,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-17 21:53:15,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-17 21:53:15,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-17 21:53:15,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-17 21:53:15,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-17 21:53:15,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-17 21:53:15,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-17 21:53:15,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-17 21:53:15,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-17 21:53:15,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-17 21:53:15,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-17 21:53:15,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-17 21:53:15,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-17 21:53:15,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-17 21:53:15,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-17 21:53:15,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-17 21:53:15,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-17 21:53:15,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-17 21:53:15,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-17 21:53:15,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-17 21:53:15,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-17 21:53:15,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-17 21:53:15,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-17 21:53:15,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-17 21:53:15,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-17 21:53:15,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-17 21:53:15,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-17 21:53:15,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-17 21:53:15,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-17 21:53:15,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-17 21:53:15,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-17 21:53:15,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-17 21:53:15,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-17 21:53:15,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-17 21:53:15,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-17 21:53:15,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-17 21:53:15,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-17 21:53:15,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-17 21:53:15,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-17 21:53:15,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-17 21:53:15,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-17 21:53:15,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-17 21:53:15,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-17 21:53:15,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-17 21:53:15,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-17 21:53:15,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-17 21:53:15,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-17 21:53:15,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-17 21:53:15,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-17 21:53:15,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-17 21:53:15,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-17 21:53:15,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-17 21:53:15,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-17 21:53:15,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-17 21:53:15,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-17 21:53:15,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-17 21:53:15,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-17 21:53:15,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-17 21:53:15,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-17 21:53:15,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-17 21:53:15,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-17 21:53:15,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-17 21:53:15,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-17 21:53:15,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-17 21:53:15,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-17 21:53:15,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-17 21:53:15,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-17 21:53:15,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-17 21:53:15,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-17 21:53:15,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-17 21:53:15,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-17 21:53:15,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-17 21:53:15,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-17 21:53:15,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-17 21:53:15,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-17 21:53:15,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-17 21:53:15,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-17 21:53:15,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-17 21:53:15,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-17 21:53:15,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-17 21:53:15,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-17 21:53:15,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-17 21:53:15,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-17 21:53:15,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-17 21:53:15,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-17 21:53:15,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-17 21:53:15,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-17 21:53:15,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-17 21:53:15,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-17 21:53:15,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-17 21:53:15,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-17 21:53:15,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-17 21:53:15,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-17 21:53:15,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-17 21:53:15,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-17 21:53:15,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-17 21:53:15,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-17 21:53:15,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-17 21:53:15,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-17 21:53:15,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-17 21:53:15,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-17 21:53:15,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-17 21:53:15,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-17 21:53:15,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-17 21:53:15,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-17 21:53:15,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-17 21:53:15,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-17 21:53:15,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-17 21:53:15,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-17 21:53:15,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-17 21:53:15,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-17 21:53:15,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-17 21:53:15,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-17 21:53:15,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-17 21:53:15,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-17 21:53:15,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-17 21:53:15,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-17 21:53:15,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-17 21:53:15,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-17 21:53:15,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-17 21:53:15,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-17 21:53:15,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-17 21:53:15,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-17 21:53:15,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-17 21:53:15,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-17 21:53:15,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-17 21:53:15,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-17 21:53:15,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-17 21:53:15,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-17 21:53:15,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-17 21:53:15,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-17 21:53:15,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-17 21:53:15,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-17 21:53:15,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-17 21:53:15,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-17 21:53:15,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-17 21:53:15,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-17 21:53:15,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-17 21:53:15,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-17 21:53:15,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-17 21:53:15,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-17 21:53:15,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-17 21:53:15,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-17 21:53:15,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-17 21:53:15,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-17 21:53:15,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-17 21:53:15,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-17 21:53:15,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-17 21:53:15,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-17 21:53:15,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-17 21:53:15,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-17 21:53:15,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-17 21:53:15,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-17 21:53:15,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-17 21:53:15,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-17 21:53:15,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-17 21:53:15,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-17 21:53:15,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-17 21:53:15,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-17 21:53:15,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-17 21:53:15,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-17 21:53:15,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-17 21:53:15,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-17 21:53:15,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-17 21:53:15,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-17 21:53:15,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-17 21:53:15,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-17 21:53:15,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-17 21:53:15,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-17 21:53:15,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-17 21:53:15,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-17 21:53:15,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-17 21:53:15,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-17 21:53:15,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-17 21:53:15,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-17 21:53:15,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-17 21:53:15,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-17 21:53:15,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-17 21:53:15,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-17 21:53:15,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-17 21:53:15,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-17 21:53:15,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-17 21:53:15,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-17 21:53:15,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-17 21:53:15,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-17 21:53:15,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-17 21:53:15,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-17 21:53:15,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-17 21:53:15,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-17 21:53:15,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-17 21:53:15,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-17 21:53:15,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-17 21:53:15,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-17 21:53:15,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-17 21:53:15,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-17 21:53:15,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-17 21:53:15,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-17 21:53:15,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:15,399 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table21) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:15,399 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table22
2023-07-17 21:53:15,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv871358531=369, srv64697211=312, srv653261481=314, srv1778141916=154, srv716510755=323, srv372169288=255, srv568235512=298, srv710229516=322, srv537137712=293, srv1682791519=131, srv642353994=311, srv1046656068=13, srv993792848=391, srv1202667070=39, srv99567927=392, srv1607947050=111, srv1677371877=129, srv1763526149=150, srv1763378353=149, srv531263272=289, srv448398842=270, srv802808934=348, srv77960001=340, srv453521623=271, srv162773041=114, srv563606057=295, srv1659238910=122, srv1279307656=55, srv1914255334=183, srv1296605582=61, srv2131597846=222, srv1375359355=72, srv1405269336=79, srv175680261=147, srv282211488=242, srv1412891098=82, srv375712549=257, srv191234370=182, srv1574132168=106, srv1853511149=168, srv617306884=307, srv268601623=238, srv1400099806=78, srv477381292=275, srv1279442050=56, srv535853198=292, srv1767480590=152, srv2100700333=211, srv1187847151=37, srv791064637=345, srv74478935=330, srv1206084762=41, srv1497856295=97, srv897884865=377, srv398014971=261, srv786136704=342, srv1429879791=86, srv1201763981=38, srv1415213844=84, srv302220908=243, srv156683359=105, srv1974497084=192, srv535358845=291, srv627763604=308, srv732106437=326, srv1679724304=130, srv576770232=299, srv478480013=276, srv1237250370=47, srv1169018295=34, srv32320833=248, srv594880186=304, srv216306370=225, srv656484240=315, srv818754908=354, srv1321058011=63, srv1256345927=52, srv1670847243=126, srv1515243164=99, srv1781378955=156, srv508388209=278, srv1910886192=180, srv1718898730=139, srv772274482=337, srv1433624807=87, srv848605385=359, srv2107957639=212, srv270591905=240, srv2126706298=219, srv2080681743=209, srv1683990934=132, srv11526364=28, srv761020484=334, srv1720507603=141, srv266276730=236, srv935213051=386, srv923440665=383, srv1911104834=181, srv1944131651=187, srv1162841146=30, srv1921230216=185, srv319459319=247, srv1168022226=33, srv57689659=300, srv716533901=324, srv1255156178=50, srv441379967=267, srv806979625=350, srv788255577=344, srv976533744=389, srv1317853355=62, srv1491073587=96, srv777865249=339, srv2130226580=221, srv873230355=370, srv971370780=388, srv2008207413=197, srv989150800=390, srv737980208=328, srv862088563=363, srv1716783669=138, srv1801293056=160, srv1363984373=68, srv515711115=282, srv1378945327=75, srv17002515=136, srv853498273=361, srv1825292480=165, srv2124576425=217, srv1889349340=175, srv527691188=286, srv1226737728=44, srv1781498156=157, srv104267960=11, srv1663644309=124, srv1672213768=127, srv740402944=329, srv555807163=294, srv566277037=296, srv734882045=327, srv1143683685=27, srv1021400966=5, srv694407347=319, srv1626790310=113, srv303328507=244, srv1869166689=171, srv781623755=341, srv40741117=264, srv1958265988=190, srv592380483=303, srv483565354=277, srv1531731329=100, srv359746409=253, srv1271131029=54, srv1007512250=2, srv1783696565=158, srv1284150263=57, srv1648846971=118, srv120365207=40, srv263085176=235, srv535080964=290, srv824739010=357, srv744793832=331, srv1073394883=18, srv1113186104=23, srv1370321362=69, srv328204461=249, srv1604342762=109, srv266460489=237, srv313806624=245, srv1473408823=93, srv865692144=366, srv42814401=265, srv104065318=10, srv1599236554=108, srv1476834435=94, srv1673452142=128, srv716892727=325, srv1501773847=98, srv791504502=346, srv367902453=254, srv254349567=232, srv2126102976=218, srv252714068=231, srv916506189=380, srv687320190=318, srv1000433998=0, srv51396503=281, srv648464134=313, srv908419423=379, srv204022732=200, srv1901650254=177, srv200342397=196, srv765841762=335, srv1849125656=167, srv235281774=226, srv2137298641=224, srv517347076=283, srv1687711069=135, srv800105834=347, srv1609917009=112, srv1038797815=9, srv863216619=365, srv921796978=382, srv895924009=376, srv319002955=246, srv611122413=305, srv1942590787=186, srv529333113=288, srv1053973741=14, srv1988512138=194, srv1037112526=8, srv442327402=268, srv2062351281=204, srv1240518778=48, srv471289019=274, srv1857090224=170, srv1543025253=101, srv1915241294=184, srv238420451=228, srv1747796150=145, srv1101668258=21, srv1437034663=88, srv1173449481=35, srv582652595=301, srv1739043021=144, srv1733173130=143, srv465824154=272, srv14463216=91, srv1720161153=140, srv1549403995=102, srv235920151=227, srv1909060246=179, srv527988350=287, srv1801762669=161, srv89501442=375, srv442994824=269, srv1414012241=83, srv165153258=121, srv1766333515=151, srv2063438865=205, srv1071671801=17, srv1638570398=116, srv1035353226=7, srv1856921753=169, srv1887444158=173, srv1897306674=176, srv1255718022=51, srv1260078897=53, srv1372945218=70, srv1163715139=31, srv175471358=146, srv1558656747=104, srv1463869996=92, srv124825865=49, srv1142495625=26, srv1397803774=77, srv1644508836=117, srv1807320536=162, srv1165273546=32, srv1650978005=120, srv1374260725=71, srv2065239646=206, srv1685737274=134, srv878340336=371, srv329463090=250, srv2112675912=213, srv1378293943=74, srv787532288=343, srv1292867420=59, srv519831391=285, srv1002018470=1, srv822141051=356, srv1229740495=45, srv706370370=321, srv255741565=233, srv1177018836=36, srv1223505925=43, srv745532463=332, srv1820836786=163, srv2127145828=220, srv2124524081=216, srv665150476=316, srv2132621880=223, srv2051928856=203, srv1903063797=178, srv881186303=373, srv1758974023=148, srv270549378=239, srv2014789268=198, srv1663469360=123, srv1331983035=65, srv1768940632=153, srv2084732799=210, srv1043044287=12, srv630246195=309, srv86319792=364, srv37305654=256, srv1650394019=119, srv1888093001=174, srv512441512=280, srv813969264=352, srv277288989=241, srv2017714321=199, srv1410469782=81, srv751917673=333, srv1443060804=89, srv1997063872=195, srv404426071=263, srv1443287861=90, srv695697141=320, srv636958174=310, srv1105584096=22, srv583005569=302, srv92523166=384, srv330226906=251, srv1684865692=133, srv381463497=258, srv567942525=297, srv1010403208=3, srv881516937=374, srv140693587=80, srv1872213858=172, srv262210172=234, srv846799674=358, srv851169364=360, srv880017865=372, srv129190288=58, srv401606217=262, srv669535820=317, srv1325384866=64, srv1377673856=73, srv1416276025=85, srv430431276=266, srv81513922=353, srv2044458062=201, srv2118166427=214, srv1665530216=125, srv2045587532=202, srv1824773168=164, srv2071913725=208, srv1295499145=60, srv1780304939=155, srv612277490=306, srv102508625=6, srv1637539828=115, srv820424989=355, srv50966795=279, srv1950402166=188, srv1207208580=42, srv1057648579=16, srv1084295726=20, srv39165764=260, srv959379519=387, srv2066402828=207, srv1556810592=103, srv1232731779=46, srv1606144164=110, srv1487275322=95, srv519310224=284, srv775221203=338, srv1079168923=19, srv1957834842=189, srv866525142=367, srv243907419=229, srv248553307=230, srv344122075=252, srv467461515=273, srv805609280=349, srv1018507425=4, srv1827511993=166, srv1704639485=137, srv855754935=362, srv1057024901=15, srv1116429721=24, srv927375731=385, srv1383836323=76, srv1584407048=107, srv809779157=351, srv1786622589=159, srv869541705=368, srv1123072042=25, srv1726136626=142, srv135800579=67, srv1958676591=191, srv390748718=259, srv907223095=378, srv76871917=336, srv1160170031=29, srv2119727728=215, srv918100507=381, srv1352063642=66, srv1975716907=193} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:15,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:15,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:15,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:15,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:15,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:15,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:15,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:15,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:15,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:15,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:15,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-17 21:53:15,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-17 21:53:15,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-17 21:53:15,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-17 21:53:15,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-17 21:53:15,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-17 21:53:15,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-17 21:53:15,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-17 21:53:15,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-17 21:53:15,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-17 21:53:15,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-17 21:53:15,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-17 21:53:15,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-17 21:53:15,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-17 21:53:15,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-17 21:53:15,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-17 21:53:15,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-17 21:53:15,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-17 21:53:15,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-17 21:53:15,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-17 21:53:15,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-17 21:53:15,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-17 21:53:15,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-17 21:53:15,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-17 21:53:15,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-17 21:53:15,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-17 21:53:15,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-17 21:53:15,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-17 21:53:15,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-17 21:53:15,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-17 21:53:15,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-17 21:53:15,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-17 21:53:15,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-17 21:53:15,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-17 21:53:15,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-17 21:53:15,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-17 21:53:15,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-17 21:53:15,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-17 21:53:15,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-17 21:53:15,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-17 21:53:15,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-17 21:53:15,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-17 21:53:15,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-17 21:53:15,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-17 21:53:15,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-17 21:53:15,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-17 21:53:15,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-17 21:53:15,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-17 21:53:15,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-17 21:53:15,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-17 21:53:15,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-17 21:53:15,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-17 21:53:15,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-17 21:53:15,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-17 21:53:15,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-17 21:53:15,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-17 21:53:15,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-17 21:53:15,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-17 21:53:15,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-17 21:53:15,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-17 21:53:15,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-17 21:53:15,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-17 21:53:15,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-17 21:53:15,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-17 21:53:15,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-17 21:53:15,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-17 21:53:15,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-17 21:53:15,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-17 21:53:15,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-17 21:53:15,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-17 21:53:15,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-17 21:53:15,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-17 21:53:15,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-17 21:53:15,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-17 21:53:15,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-17 21:53:15,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-17 21:53:15,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-17 21:53:15,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-17 21:53:15,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-17 21:53:15,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-17 21:53:15,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-17 21:53:15,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-17 21:53:15,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-17 21:53:15,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-17 21:53:15,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-17 21:53:15,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-17 21:53:15,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-17 21:53:15,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-17 21:53:15,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-17 21:53:15,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-17 21:53:15,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-17 21:53:15,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-17 21:53:15,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-17 21:53:15,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-17 21:53:15,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-17 21:53:15,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-17 21:53:15,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-17 21:53:15,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-17 21:53:15,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-17 21:53:15,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-17 21:53:15,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-17 21:53:15,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-17 21:53:15,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-17 21:53:15,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-17 21:53:15,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-17 21:53:15,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-17 21:53:15,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-17 21:53:15,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-17 21:53:15,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-17 21:53:15,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-17 21:53:15,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-17 21:53:15,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-17 21:53:15,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-17 21:53:15,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-17 21:53:15,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-17 21:53:15,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-17 21:53:15,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-17 21:53:15,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-17 21:53:15,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-17 21:53:15,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-17 21:53:15,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-17 21:53:15,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-17 21:53:15,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-17 21:53:15,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-17 21:53:15,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-17 21:53:15,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-17 21:53:15,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-17 21:53:15,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-17 21:53:15,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-17 21:53:15,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-17 21:53:15,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-17 21:53:15,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-17 21:53:15,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-17 21:53:15,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-17 21:53:15,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-17 21:53:15,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-17 21:53:15,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-17 21:53:15,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-17 21:53:15,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-17 21:53:15,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-17 21:53:15,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-17 21:53:15,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-17 21:53:15,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-17 21:53:15,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-17 21:53:15,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-17 21:53:15,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-17 21:53:15,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-17 21:53:15,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-17 21:53:15,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-17 21:53:15,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-17 21:53:15,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-17 21:53:15,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-17 21:53:15,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-17 21:53:15,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-17 21:53:15,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-17 21:53:15,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-17 21:53:15,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-17 21:53:15,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-17 21:53:15,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-17 21:53:15,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-17 21:53:15,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-17 21:53:15,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-17 21:53:15,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-17 21:53:15,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-17 21:53:15,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-17 21:53:15,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-17 21:53:15,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-17 21:53:15,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-17 21:53:15,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-17 21:53:15,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-17 21:53:15,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-17 21:53:15,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-17 21:53:15,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-17 21:53:15,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-17 21:53:15,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-17 21:53:15,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-17 21:53:15,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-17 21:53:15,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-17 21:53:15,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-17 21:53:15,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-17 21:53:15,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-17 21:53:15,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-17 21:53:15,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-17 21:53:15,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-17 21:53:15,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-17 21:53:15,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-17 21:53:15,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-17 21:53:15,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-17 21:53:15,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-17 21:53:15,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-17 21:53:15,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-17 21:53:15,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-17 21:53:15,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-17 21:53:15,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-17 21:53:15,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-17 21:53:15,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-17 21:53:15,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-17 21:53:15,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-17 21:53:15,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-17 21:53:15,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-17 21:53:15,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-17 21:53:15,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-17 21:53:15,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-17 21:53:15,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-17 21:53:15,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-17 21:53:15,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-17 21:53:15,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-17 21:53:15,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-17 21:53:15,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-17 21:53:15,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-17 21:53:15,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-17 21:53:15,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-17 21:53:15,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-17 21:53:15,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-17 21:53:15,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-17 21:53:15,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-17 21:53:15,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-17 21:53:15,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-17 21:53:15,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-17 21:53:15,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-17 21:53:15,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-17 21:53:15,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-17 21:53:15,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-17 21:53:15,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-17 21:53:15,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-17 21:53:15,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-17 21:53:15,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-17 21:53:15,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-17 21:53:15,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-17 21:53:15,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-17 21:53:15,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-17 21:53:15,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-17 21:53:15,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-17 21:53:15,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-17 21:53:15,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-17 21:53:15,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-17 21:53:15,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-17 21:53:15,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-17 21:53:15,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-17 21:53:15,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-17 21:53:15,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-17 21:53:15,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-17 21:53:15,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-17 21:53:15,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-17 21:53:15,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-17 21:53:15,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-17 21:53:15,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-17 21:53:15,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-17 21:53:15,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-17 21:53:15,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-17 21:53:15,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-17 21:53:15,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-17 21:53:15,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-17 21:53:15,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-17 21:53:15,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-17 21:53:15,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-17 21:53:15,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-17 21:53:15,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-17 21:53:15,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-17 21:53:15,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-17 21:53:15,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-17 21:53:15,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-17 21:53:15,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-17 21:53:15,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-17 21:53:15,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-17 21:53:15,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-17 21:53:15,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-17 21:53:15,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-17 21:53:15,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-17 21:53:15,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-17 21:53:15,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-17 21:53:15,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-17 21:53:15,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-17 21:53:15,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-17 21:53:15,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-17 21:53:15,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-17 21:53:15,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-17 21:53:15,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-17 21:53:15,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-17 21:53:15,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-17 21:53:15,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-17 21:53:15,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-17 21:53:15,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-17 21:53:15,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-17 21:53:15,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-17 21:53:15,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-17 21:53:15,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-17 21:53:15,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-17 21:53:15,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-17 21:53:15,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-17 21:53:15,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-17 21:53:15,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-17 21:53:15,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-17 21:53:15,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-17 21:53:15,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-17 21:53:15,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-17 21:53:15,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-17 21:53:15,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-17 21:53:15,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-17 21:53:15,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-17 21:53:15,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-17 21:53:15,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-17 21:53:15,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-17 21:53:15,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-17 21:53:15,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-17 21:53:15,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-17 21:53:15,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-17 21:53:15,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-17 21:53:15,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-17 21:53:15,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-17 21:53:15,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-17 21:53:15,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-17 21:53:15,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-17 21:53:15,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-17 21:53:15,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-17 21:53:15,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-17 21:53:15,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-17 21:53:15,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-17 21:53:15,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-17 21:53:15,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-17 21:53:15,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-17 21:53:15,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-17 21:53:15,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-17 21:53:15,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-17 21:53:15,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-17 21:53:15,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-17 21:53:15,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-17 21:53:15,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-17 21:53:15,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-17 21:53:15,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-17 21:53:15,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-17 21:53:15,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-17 21:53:15,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-17 21:53:15,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-17 21:53:15,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-17 21:53:15,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-17 21:53:15,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-17 21:53:15,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-17 21:53:15,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-17 21:53:15,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-17 21:53:15,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-17 21:53:15,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-17 21:53:15,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-17 21:53:15,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-17 21:53:15,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-17 21:53:15,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-17 21:53:15,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-17 21:53:15,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-17 21:53:15,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-17 21:53:15,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-17 21:53:15,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-17 21:53:15,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-17 21:53:15,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-17 21:53:15,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-17 21:53:15,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-17 21:53:15,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-17 21:53:15,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-17 21:53:15,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-17 21:53:15,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-17 21:53:15,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-17 21:53:15,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-17 21:53:15,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-17 21:53:15,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-17 21:53:15,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-17 21:53:15,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-17 21:53:15,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-17 21:53:15,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-17 21:53:15,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-17 21:53:15,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-17 21:53:15,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-17 21:53:15,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-17 21:53:15,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-17 21:53:15,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-17 21:53:15,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-17 21:53:15,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-17 21:53:15,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-17 21:53:15,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-17 21:53:15,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-17 21:53:15,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-17 21:53:15,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-17 21:53:15,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-17 21:53:15,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-17 21:53:15,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-17 21:53:15,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:15,414 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table22) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:15,414 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table23
2023-07-17 21:53:15,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv871358531=369, srv64697211=312, srv653261481=314, srv1778141916=154, srv716510755=323, srv372169288=255, srv568235512=298, srv710229516=322, srv537137712=293, srv1682791519=131, srv642353994=311, srv1046656068=13, srv993792848=391, srv1202667070=39, srv99567927=392, srv1607947050=111, srv1677371877=129, srv1763526149=150, srv1763378353=149, srv531263272=289, srv448398842=270, srv802808934=348, srv77960001=340, srv453521623=271, srv162773041=114, srv563606057=295, srv1659238910=122, srv1279307656=55, srv1914255334=183, srv1296605582=61, srv2131597846=222, srv1375359355=72, srv1405269336=79, srv175680261=147, srv282211488=242, srv1412891098=82, srv375712549=257, srv191234370=182, srv1574132168=106, srv1853511149=168, srv617306884=307, srv268601623=238, srv1400099806=78, srv477381292=275, srv1279442050=56, srv535853198=292, srv1767480590=152, srv2100700333=211, srv1187847151=37, srv791064637=345, srv74478935=330, srv1206084762=41, srv1497856295=97, srv897884865=377, srv398014971=261, srv786136704=342, srv1429879791=86, srv1201763981=38, srv1415213844=84, srv302220908=243, srv156683359=105, srv1974497084=192, srv535358845=291, srv627763604=308, srv732106437=326, srv1679724304=130, srv576770232=299, srv478480013=276, srv1237250370=47, srv1169018295=34, srv32320833=248, srv594880186=304, srv216306370=225, srv656484240=315, srv818754908=354, srv1321058011=63, srv1256345927=52, srv1670847243=126, srv1515243164=99, srv1781378955=156, srv508388209=278, srv1910886192=180, srv1718898730=139, srv772274482=337, srv1433624807=87, srv848605385=359, srv2107957639=212, srv270591905=240, srv2126706298=219, srv2080681743=209, srv1683990934=132, srv11526364=28, srv761020484=334, srv1720507603=141, srv266276730=236, srv935213051=386, srv923440665=383, srv1911104834=181, srv1944131651=187, srv1162841146=30, srv1921230216=185, srv319459319=247, srv1168022226=33, srv57689659=300, srv716533901=324, srv1255156178=50, srv441379967=267, srv806979625=350, srv788255577=344, srv976533744=389, srv1317853355=62, srv1491073587=96, srv777865249=339, srv2130226580=221, srv873230355=370, srv971370780=388, srv2008207413=197, srv989150800=390, srv737980208=328, srv862088563=363, srv1716783669=138, srv1801293056=160, srv1363984373=68, srv515711115=282, srv1378945327=75, srv17002515=136, srv853498273=361, srv1825292480=165, srv2124576425=217, srv1889349340=175, srv527691188=286, srv1226737728=44, srv1781498156=157, srv104267960=11, srv1663644309=124, srv1672213768=127, srv740402944=329, srv555807163=294, srv566277037=296, srv734882045=327, srv1143683685=27, srv1021400966=5, srv694407347=319, srv1626790310=113, srv303328507=244, srv1869166689=171, srv781623755=341, srv40741117=264, srv1958265988=190, srv592380483=303, srv483565354=277, srv1531731329=100, srv359746409=253, srv1271131029=54, srv1007512250=2, srv1783696565=158, srv1284150263=57, srv1648846971=118, srv120365207=40, srv263085176=235, srv535080964=290, srv824739010=357, srv744793832=331, srv1073394883=18, srv1113186104=23, srv1370321362=69, srv328204461=249, srv1604342762=109, srv266460489=237, srv313806624=245, srv1473408823=93, srv865692144=366, srv42814401=265, srv104065318=10, srv1599236554=108, srv1476834435=94, srv1673452142=128, srv716892727=325, srv1501773847=98, srv791504502=346, srv367902453=254, srv254349567=232, srv2126102976=218, srv252714068=231, srv916506189=380, srv687320190=318, srv1000433998=0, srv51396503=281, srv648464134=313, srv908419423=379, srv204022732=200, srv1901650254=177, srv200342397=196, srv765841762=335, srv1849125656=167, srv235281774=226, srv2137298641=224, srv517347076=283, srv1687711069=135, srv800105834=347, srv1609917009=112, srv1038797815=9, srv863216619=365, srv921796978=382, srv895924009=376, srv319002955=246, srv611122413=305, srv1942590787=186, srv529333113=288, srv1053973741=14, srv1988512138=194, srv1037112526=8, srv442327402=268, srv2062351281=204, srv1240518778=48, srv471289019=274, srv1857090224=170, srv1543025253=101, srv1915241294=184, srv238420451=228, srv1747796150=145, srv1101668258=21, srv1437034663=88, srv1173449481=35, srv582652595=301, srv1739043021=144, srv1733173130=143, srv465824154=272, srv14463216=91, srv1720161153=140, srv1549403995=102, srv235920151=227, srv1909060246=179, srv527988350=287, srv1801762669=161, srv89501442=375, srv442994824=269, srv1414012241=83, srv165153258=121, srv1766333515=151, srv2063438865=205, srv1071671801=17, srv1638570398=116, srv1035353226=7, srv1856921753=169, srv1887444158=173, srv1897306674=176, srv1255718022=51, srv1260078897=53, srv1372945218=70, srv1163715139=31, srv175471358=146, srv1558656747=104, srv1463869996=92, srv124825865=49, srv1142495625=26, srv1397803774=77, srv1644508836=117, srv1807320536=162, srv1165273546=32, srv1650978005=120, srv1374260725=71, srv2065239646=206, srv1685737274=134, srv878340336=371, srv329463090=250, srv2112675912=213, srv1378293943=74, srv787532288=343, srv1292867420=59, srv519831391=285, srv1002018470=1, srv822141051=356, srv1229740495=45, srv706370370=321, srv255741565=233, srv1177018836=36, srv1223505925=43, srv745532463=332, srv1820836786=163, srv2127145828=220, srv2124524081=216, srv665150476=316, srv2132621880=223, srv2051928856=203, srv1903063797=178, srv881186303=373, srv1758974023=148, srv270549378=239, srv2014789268=198, srv1663469360=123, srv1331983035=65, srv1768940632=153, srv2084732799=210, srv1043044287=12, srv630246195=309, srv86319792=364, srv37305654=256, srv1650394019=119, srv1888093001=174, srv512441512=280, srv813969264=352, srv277288989=241, srv2017714321=199, srv1410469782=81, srv751917673=333, srv1443060804=89, srv1997063872=195, srv404426071=263, srv1443287861=90, srv695697141=320, srv636958174=310, srv1105584096=22, srv583005569=302, srv92523166=384, srv330226906=251, srv1684865692=133, srv381463497=258, srv567942525=297, srv1010403208=3, srv881516937=374, srv140693587=80, srv1872213858=172, srv262210172=234, srv846799674=358, srv851169364=360, srv880017865=372, srv129190288=58, srv401606217=262, srv669535820=317, srv1325384866=64, srv1377673856=73, srv1416276025=85, srv430431276=266, srv81513922=353, srv2044458062=201, srv2118166427=214, srv1665530216=125, srv2045587532=202, srv1824773168=164, srv2071913725=208, srv1295499145=60, srv1780304939=155, srv612277490=306, srv102508625=6, srv1637539828=115, srv820424989=355, srv50966795=279, srv1950402166=188, srv1207208580=42, srv1057648579=16, srv1084295726=20, srv39165764=260, srv959379519=387, srv2066402828=207, srv1556810592=103, srv1232731779=46, srv1606144164=110, srv1487275322=95, srv519310224=284, srv775221203=338, srv1079168923=19, srv1957834842=189, srv866525142=367, srv243907419=229, srv248553307=230, srv344122075=252, srv467461515=273, srv805609280=349, srv1018507425=4, srv1827511993=166, srv1704639485=137, srv855754935=362, srv1057024901=15, srv1116429721=24, srv927375731=385, srv1383836323=76, srv1584407048=107, srv809779157=351, srv1786622589=159, srv869541705=368, srv1123072042=25, srv1726136626=142, srv135800579=67, srv1958676591=191, srv390748718=259, srv907223095=378, srv76871917=336, srv1160170031=29, srv2119727728=215, srv918100507=381, srv1352063642=66, srv1975716907=193} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:15,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:15,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:15,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:15,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:15,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:15,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:15,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:15,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:15,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:15,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:15,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-17 21:53:15,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-17 21:53:15,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-17 21:53:15,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-17 21:53:15,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-17 21:53:15,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-17 21:53:15,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-17 21:53:15,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-17 21:53:15,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-17 21:53:15,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-17 21:53:15,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-17 21:53:15,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-17 21:53:15,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-17 21:53:15,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-17 21:53:15,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-17 21:53:15,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-17 21:53:15,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-17 21:53:15,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-17 21:53:15,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-17 21:53:15,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-17 21:53:15,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-17 21:53:15,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-17 21:53:15,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-17 21:53:15,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-17 21:53:15,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-17 21:53:15,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-17 21:53:15,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-17 21:53:15,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-17 21:53:15,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-17 21:53:15,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-17 21:53:15,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-17 21:53:15,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-17 21:53:15,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-17 21:53:15,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-17 21:53:15,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-17 21:53:15,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-17 21:53:15,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-17 21:53:15,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-17 21:53:15,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-17 21:53:15,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-17 21:53:15,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-17 21:53:15,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-17 21:53:15,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-17 21:53:15,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-17 21:53:15,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-17 21:53:15,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-17 21:53:15,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-17 21:53:15,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-17 21:53:15,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-17 21:53:15,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-17 21:53:15,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-17 21:53:15,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-17 21:53:15,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-17 21:53:15,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-17 21:53:15,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-17 21:53:15,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-17 21:53:15,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-17 21:53:15,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-17 21:53:15,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-17 21:53:15,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-17 21:53:15,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-17 21:53:15,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-17 21:53:15,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-17 21:53:15,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-17 21:53:15,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-17 21:53:15,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-17 21:53:15,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-17 21:53:15,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-17 21:53:15,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-17 21:53:15,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-17 21:53:15,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-17 21:53:15,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-17 21:53:15,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-17 21:53:15,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-17 21:53:15,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-17 21:53:15,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-17 21:53:15,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-17 21:53:15,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-17 21:53:15,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-17 21:53:15,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-17 21:53:15,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-17 21:53:15,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-17 21:53:15,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-17 21:53:15,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-17 21:53:15,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-17 21:53:15,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-17 21:53:15,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-17 21:53:15,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-17 21:53:15,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-17 21:53:15,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-17 21:53:15,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-17 21:53:15,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-17 21:53:15,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-17 21:53:15,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-17 21:53:15,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-17 21:53:15,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-17 21:53:15,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-17 21:53:15,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-17 21:53:15,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-17 21:53:15,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-17 21:53:15,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-17 21:53:15,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-17 21:53:15,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-17 21:53:15,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-17 21:53:15,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-17 21:53:15,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-17 21:53:15,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-17 21:53:15,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-17 21:53:15,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-17 21:53:15,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-17 21:53:15,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-17 21:53:15,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-17 21:53:15,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-17 21:53:15,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-17 21:53:15,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-17 21:53:15,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-17 21:53:15,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-17 21:53:15,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-17 21:53:15,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-17 21:53:15,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-17 21:53:15,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-17 21:53:15,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-17 21:53:15,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-17 21:53:15,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-17 21:53:15,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-17 21:53:15,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-17 21:53:15,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-17 21:53:15,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-17 21:53:15,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-17 21:53:15,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-17 21:53:15,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-17 21:53:15,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-17 21:53:15,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-17 21:53:15,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-17 21:53:15,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-17 21:53:15,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-17 21:53:15,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-17 21:53:15,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-17 21:53:15,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-17 21:53:15,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-17 21:53:15,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-17 21:53:15,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-17 21:53:15,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-17 21:53:15,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-17 21:53:15,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-17 21:53:15,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-17 21:53:15,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-17 21:53:15,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-17 21:53:15,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-17 21:53:15,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-17 21:53:15,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-17 21:53:15,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-17 21:53:15,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-17 21:53:15,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-17 21:53:15,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-17 21:53:15,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-17 21:53:15,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-17 21:53:15,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-17 21:53:15,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-17 21:53:15,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-17 21:53:15,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-17 21:53:15,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-17 21:53:15,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-17 21:53:15,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-17 21:53:15,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-17 21:53:15,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-17 21:53:15,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-17 21:53:15,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-17 21:53:15,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-17 21:53:15,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-17 21:53:15,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-17 21:53:15,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-17 21:53:15,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-17 21:53:15,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-17 21:53:15,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-17 21:53:15,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-17 21:53:15,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-17 21:53:15,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-17 21:53:15,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-17 21:53:15,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-17 21:53:15,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-17 21:53:15,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-17 21:53:15,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-17 21:53:15,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-17 21:53:15,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-17 21:53:15,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-17 21:53:15,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-17 21:53:15,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-17 21:53:15,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-17 21:53:15,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-17 21:53:15,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-17 21:53:15,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-17 21:53:15,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-17 21:53:15,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-17 21:53:15,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-17 21:53:15,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-17 21:53:15,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-17 21:53:15,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-17 21:53:15,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-17 21:53:15,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-17 21:53:15,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-17 21:53:15,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-17 21:53:15,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-17 21:53:15,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-17 21:53:15,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-17 21:53:15,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-17 21:53:15,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-17 21:53:15,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-17 21:53:15,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-17 21:53:15,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-17 21:53:15,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-17 21:53:15,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-17 21:53:15,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-17 21:53:15,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-17 21:53:15,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-17 21:53:15,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-17 21:53:15,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-17 21:53:15,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-17 21:53:15,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-17 21:53:15,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-17 21:53:15,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-17 21:53:15,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-17 21:53:15,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-17 21:53:15,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-17 21:53:15,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-17 21:53:15,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-17 21:53:15,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-17 21:53:15,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-17 21:53:15,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-17 21:53:15,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-17 21:53:15,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-17 21:53:15,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-17 21:53:15,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-17 21:53:15,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-17 21:53:15,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-17 21:53:15,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-17 21:53:15,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-17 21:53:15,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-17 21:53:15,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-17 21:53:15,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-17 21:53:15,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-17 21:53:15,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-17 21:53:15,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-17 21:53:15,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-17 21:53:15,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-17 21:53:15,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-17 21:53:15,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-17 21:53:15,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-17 21:53:15,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-17 21:53:15,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-17 21:53:15,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-17 21:53:15,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-17 21:53:15,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-17 21:53:15,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-17 21:53:15,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-17 21:53:15,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-17 21:53:15,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-17 21:53:15,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-17 21:53:15,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-17 21:53:15,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-17 21:53:15,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-17 21:53:15,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-17 21:53:15,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-17 21:53:15,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-17 21:53:15,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-17 21:53:15,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-17 21:53:15,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-17 21:53:15,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-17 21:53:15,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-17 21:53:15,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-17 21:53:15,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-17 21:53:15,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-17 21:53:15,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-17 21:53:15,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-17 21:53:15,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-17 21:53:15,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-17 21:53:15,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-17 21:53:15,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-17 21:53:15,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-17 21:53:15,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-17 21:53:15,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-17 21:53:15,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-17 21:53:15,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-17 21:53:15,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-17 21:53:15,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-17 21:53:15,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-17 21:53:15,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-17 21:53:15,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-17 21:53:15,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-17 21:53:15,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-17 21:53:15,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-17 21:53:15,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-17 21:53:15,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-17 21:53:15,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-17 21:53:15,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-17 21:53:15,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-17 21:53:15,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-17 21:53:15,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-17 21:53:15,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-17 21:53:15,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-17 21:53:15,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-17 21:53:15,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-17 21:53:15,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-17 21:53:15,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-17 21:53:15,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-17 21:53:15,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-17 21:53:15,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-17 21:53:15,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-17 21:53:15,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-17 21:53:15,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-17 21:53:15,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-17 21:53:15,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-17 21:53:15,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-17 21:53:15,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-17 21:53:15,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-17 21:53:15,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-17 21:53:15,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-17 21:53:15,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-17 21:53:15,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-17 21:53:15,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-17 21:53:15,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-17 21:53:15,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-17 21:53:15,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-17 21:53:15,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-17 21:53:15,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-17 21:53:15,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-17 21:53:15,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-17 21:53:15,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-17 21:53:15,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-17 21:53:15,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-17 21:53:15,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-17 21:53:15,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-17 21:53:15,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-17 21:53:15,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-17 21:53:15,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-17 21:53:15,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-17 21:53:15,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-17 21:53:15,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-17 21:53:15,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-17 21:53:15,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-17 21:53:15,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-17 21:53:15,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-17 21:53:15,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-17 21:53:15,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-17 21:53:15,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-17 21:53:15,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-17 21:53:15,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-17 21:53:15,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-17 21:53:15,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-17 21:53:15,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-17 21:53:15,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-17 21:53:15,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-17 21:53:15,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-17 21:53:15,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-17 21:53:15,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-17 21:53:15,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-17 21:53:15,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-17 21:53:15,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-17 21:53:15,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-17 21:53:15,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-17 21:53:15,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-17 21:53:15,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-17 21:53:15,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-17 21:53:15,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-17 21:53:15,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-17 21:53:15,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-17 21:53:15,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-17 21:53:15,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-17 21:53:15,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-17 21:53:15,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-17 21:53:15,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-17 21:53:15,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-17 21:53:15,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-17 21:53:15,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-17 21:53:15,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-17 21:53:15,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-17 21:53:15,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-17 21:53:15,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-17 21:53:15,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-17 21:53:15,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-17 21:53:15,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-17 21:53:15,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-17 21:53:15,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-17 21:53:15,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:15,429 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table23) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:15,430 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1082): slop=0.0, systemTablesOnMaster=false
2023-07-17 21:53:15,430 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(253): Loaded config; maxSteps=1000000, runMaxSteps=false, stepsPerRegion=800, maxRunningTime=30000, isByTable=false, CostFunctions=[RegionCountSkewCostFunction, PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction, MoveCostFunction, RackLocalityCostFunction, TableSkewCostFunction, RegionReplicaHostCostFunction, RegionReplicaRackCostFunction, ReadRequestCostFunction, WriteRequestCostFunction, MemStoreSizeCostFunction, StoreFileCostFunction] , sum of multiplier of cost functions = 577.0 etc.
2023-07-17 21:53:15,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-17 21:53:15,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-17 21:53:15,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-17 21:53:15,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-17 21:53:15,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-17 21:53:15,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1146610349=1, srv1017807595=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:15,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:15,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:15,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=2, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:15,432 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:15,433 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.8665511265164645, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=3200
2023-07-17 21:53:15,458 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 25 ms to try 3200 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 1 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.8665511265164645 to a new imbalance of 0.006065857885615251. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.5); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:15,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-17 21:53:15,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv567863482=1, srv50246302=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:15,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:15,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:15,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=2, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:15,519 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:15,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-17 21:53:15,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv839574088=1, srv1333896093=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:15,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:15,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:15,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=2, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:15,519 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:15,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-17 21:53:15,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1253842581=1, srv1010900407=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:15,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:15,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:15,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=3, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:15,520 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:15,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-17 21:53:15,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv890429562=1, srv1987023249=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:15,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:15,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:15,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=4, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:15,521 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.2888503755054882 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.33333333333333337); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:15,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-17 21:53:15,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1152669640=0, srv975378091=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:15,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:15,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:15,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:15,521 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:15,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-17 21:53:15,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv622072897=1, srv512253668=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:15,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:15,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:15,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:15,522 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:15,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-17 21:53:15,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv849683192=1, srv102739512=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:15,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:15,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:15,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=10, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:15,523 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.6932409012131716 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.8); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:15,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-17 21:53:15,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1979911973=0, srv576691371=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:15,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:15,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:15,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1432, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:15,553 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.40878413881917497 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.4717368961973279); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:15,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-17 21:53:15,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2139494814=1, srv142264794=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:15,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:15,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:15,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=53, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:15,555 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.034662045060658585 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.04000000000000001); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:15,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-17 21:53:15,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv84805246=2, srv125730758=0, srv773600601=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:15,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:15,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:15,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:15,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=2, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:15,556 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.5773502691896258); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:15,556 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.5003035261608543, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.5773502691896258); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=7200
2023-07-17 21:53:15,583 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 27 ms to try 7200 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 1 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.5003035261608543 to a new imbalance of 0.004043905257076833. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.3333333333333333); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:15,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-17 21:53:15,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv726515486=2, srv1530133456=1, srv1329283823=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:15,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:15,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:15,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:15,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=3, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:15,584 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.25015176308042714 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.2886751345948129); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:15,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-17 21:53:15,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2091536082=1, srv2016155685=0, srv807683407=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:15,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:15,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:15,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:15,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=2, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:15,585 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.33333333333333337); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:15,585 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.2888503755054882, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.33333333333333337); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=9600
2023-07-17 21:53:15,607 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 21 ms to try 9600 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 1 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.2888503755054882 to a new imbalance of 0.0030329289428076256. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.25); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:15,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-17 21:53:15,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1073870103=0, srv1584337422=1, srv782947968=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:15,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:15,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:15,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:15,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=3, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:15,608 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:15,608 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.8665511265164645, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=7200
2023-07-17 21:53:15,619 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 11 ms to try 7200 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 2 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.8665511265164645 to a new imbalance of 0.008087810514153667. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.6666666666666666); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:15,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-17 21:53:15,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv451216474=2, srv1040978812=0, srv1168562797=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:15,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:15,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:15,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:15,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=4, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:15,620 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:15,620 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.8665511265164645, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=9600
2023-07-17 21:53:15,632 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 12 ms to try 9600 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 2 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.8665511265164645 to a new imbalance of 0.006065857885615251. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.5); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:15,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-17 21:53:15,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1676489458=1, srv1593123033=0, srv574215390=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:15,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:15,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:15,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:15,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=20, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:15,633 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.4871794871794873); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:15,633 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.42216593343109815, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.4871794871794873); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=96000
2023-07-17 21:53:15,812 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 178 ms to try 96000 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 13 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.42216593343109815 to a new imbalance of 0.003942807625649913. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.325); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:15,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-17 21:53:15,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv748985492=3, srv32111317=2, srv1463950495=0, srv1601365165=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:15,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:15,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:15,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:15,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:15,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=3, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:15,812 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.29457175359290033); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:15,812 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.25526148491585815, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.29457175359290033); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=19200
2023-07-17 21:53:15,837 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 24 ms to try 19200 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 1 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.25526148491585815 to a new imbalance of 0.0020219526285384167. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.16666666666666666); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:15,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-17 21:53:15,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv337191228=1, srv970473341=3, srv766263527=2, srv2082929603=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:15,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:15,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:15,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:15,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:15,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=4, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:15,837 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:15,837 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.8665511265164645, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=12800
2023-07-17 21:53:15,853 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 16 ms to try 12800 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 3 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.8665511265164645 to a new imbalance of 0.009098786828422877. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.75); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:15,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-17 21:53:15,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2083207101=0, srv325307981=1, srv959976163=3, srv764099478=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:15,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:15,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:15,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:15,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:15,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=5, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:15,854 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:15,854 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.8665511265164645, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=16000
2023-07-17 21:53:15,874 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 20 ms to try 16000 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 3 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.8665511265164645 to a new imbalance of 0.007279029462738302. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.6); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:15,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-17 21:53:15,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1274430647=0, srv69556775=1, srv738696586=2, srv973930732=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:15,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:15,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:15,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:15,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:15,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=6, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:15,875 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.5773502691896257); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:15,875 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.5003035261608542, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.5773502691896257); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=38400
2023-07-17 21:53:15,927 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 52 ms to try 38400 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 6 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.5003035261608542 to a new imbalance of 0.006065857885615251. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.5); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:15,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-17 21:53:15,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1920967227=0, srv87323286=3, srv2101559138=1, srv213344351=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:15,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:15,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:15,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:15,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:15,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=6, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:15,927 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.7071067811865475); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:15,928 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.6127441778046339, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.7071067811865475); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=25600
2023-07-17 21:53:15,965 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 38 ms to try 25600 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 4 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.6127441778046339 to a new imbalance of 0.006065857885615251. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.5); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:15,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-17 21:53:15,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1553651863=2, srv501473749=3, srv1126276675=1, srv1000879775=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:15,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:15,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:15,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:15,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:15,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=6, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:15,966 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.7907604410896715); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:15,966 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.6852343510309111, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.7907604410896715); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=22400
2023-07-17 21:53:15,996 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 30 ms to try 22400 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 4 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.6852343510309111 to a new imbalance of 0.006932409012131715. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.5714285714285714); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:15,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-17 21:53:15,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1658479594=2, srv112997411=0, srv1435188892=1, srv2090766250=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:15,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:15,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:15,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:15,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:15,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=6, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:15,997 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:15,997 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.8665511265164645, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=19200
2023-07-17 21:53:16,022 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 25 ms to try 19200 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 4 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.8665511265164645 to a new imbalance of 0.008087810514153667. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.6666666666666666); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:16,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-17 21:53:16,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1456358023=0, srv1837677778=1, srv537101783=2, srv902479770=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:16,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:16,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:16,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:16,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:16,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=7, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:16,023 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0962834585018294 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.11111111111111113); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:16,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-17 21:53:16,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1136063295=0, srv1346989420=1, srv590225899=3, srv548862472=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:16,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:16,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:16,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:16,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:16,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=8, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:16,024 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.17331022530329285 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.19999999999999996); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:16,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-17 21:53:16,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv514843133=3, srv1338763569=1, srv350779068=2, srv1154712937=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:16,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:16,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:16,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:16,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:16,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=7, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:16,024 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:16,024 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.8665511265164645, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=22400
2023-07-17 21:53:16,054 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 30 ms to try 22400 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 5 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.8665511265164645 to a new imbalance of 0.008665511265164644. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.7142857142857143); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:16,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-17 21:53:16,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv343482346=3, srv103737972=0, srv1109471555=1, srv1198881813=2, srv628822028=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:16,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:16,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:16,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:16,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:16,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:16,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=4, number of hosts=5, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:16,055 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.22705408170595567 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.26202041028867284); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:16,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-17 21:53:16,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1000351539=0, srv1765111615=1, srv2106890900=3, srv899518366=5, srv2145145384=4, srv1937605435=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:16,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:16,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:16,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:16,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:16,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:16,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:16,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1500, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:16,080 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.4440183710462697); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:16,080 WARN  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(497): calculatedMaxSteps:14448000 for loadbalancer's stochastic walk is larger than maxSteps:1000000. Hence load balancing may not work well. Setting parameter "hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.runMaxSteps" to true can overcome this issue.(This config change does not require service restart)
2023-07-17 21:53:16,080 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.38476461962415054, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.4440183710462697); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=1000000
2023-07-17 21:53:36,180 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 20102 ms to try 1000000 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 1018 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.38476461962415054 to a new imbalance of 0.004103018822296562. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.3382059800664452); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:36,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-17 21:53:36,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1148771762=1, srv1067860037=0, srv117762447=2, srv1191546345=3, srv1845302269=5, srv1667683291=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:36,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:36,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:36,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:36,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:36,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:36,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:36,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1500, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:36,210 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.3438084096789955); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:36,210 WARN  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(497): calculatedMaxSteps:16800000 for loadbalancer's stochastic walk is larger than maxSteps:1000000. Hence load balancing may not work well. Setting parameter "hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.runMaxSteps" to true can overcome this issue.(This config change does not require service restart)
2023-07-17 21:53:36,210 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.2979275647131677, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.3438084096789955); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=1000000
2023-07-17 21:53:58,643 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 22436 ms to try 1000000 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 921 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.2979275647131677 to a new imbalance of 0.003192374350086655. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.2631428571428571); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:58,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-17 21:53:58,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1075950202=0, srv1143879654=1, srv830820415=14, srv220701463=11, srv1786831358=9, srv432477619=13, srv1566370445=6, srv152663890=5, srv1599439296=7, srv405037300=12, srv1304947114=2, srv1772038121=8, srv2092181180=10, srv131077290=3, srv131246690=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:58,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:58,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:58,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:58,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:58,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:58,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:58,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:58,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:58,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:58,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:58,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-17 21:53:58,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-17 21:53:58,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-17 21:53:58,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-17 21:53:58,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-17 21:53:58,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=15, number of hosts=15, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:58,647 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.12507588154021357 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.14433756729740646); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:58,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-17 21:53:58,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv802439533=9, srv1808932283=7, srv1109550595=0, srv1474526992=3, srv1755486873=6, srv1317568632=2, srv1206975070=1, srv1526304076=4, srv1549534169=5, srv2030942336=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:58,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:58,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:58,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:58,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:58,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:58,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:58,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:58,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:58,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:58,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:58,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=10, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:58,648 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:58,648 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.8665511265164645, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=80000
2023-07-17 21:53:58,766 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 117 ms to try 80000 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 9 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.8665511265164645 to a new imbalance of 0.010918544194107453. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.9); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:58,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-17 21:53:58,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1779260854=4, srv2074118148=5, srv1379758760=1, srv680557577=8, srv1324928949=0, srv569346666=7, srv961293478=9, srv1543184981=2, srv526821975=6, srv1603488355=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:58,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:58,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:58,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:58,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:58,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:58,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:58,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:58,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:58,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:58,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:58,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=6, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:58,767 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.055531997651093117 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.06408392528936147); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:58,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-17 21:53:58,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1062533226=1, srv1831863594=5, srv271662057=7, srv441291530=8, srv1028033827=0, srv1601355535=3, srv25912093=6, srv1187263832=2, srv1715689875=4, srv539407026=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:58,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:58,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:58,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:58,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:58,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:58,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:58,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:58,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:58,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:58,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:58,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=54, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:58,768 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.9999999999999999); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:58,768 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.8665511265164644, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.9999999999999999); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=432000
2023-07-17 21:53:59,568 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 800 ms to try 432000 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 48 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.8665511265164644 to a new imbalance of 0.01078374735220489. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.8888888888888888); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:59,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-17 21:53:59,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1781013799=5, srv870651210=8, srv1328135818=0, srv986946810=9, srv165095631=2, srv498191205=7, srv1657786074=3, srv1689226973=4, srv1606835092=1, srv452981095=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:53:59,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:53:59,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:53:59,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:53:59,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:53:59,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:53:59,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:53:59,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:53:59,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:53:59,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:53:59,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:53:59,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=55, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:53:59,570 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:53:59,570 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.8665511265164645, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=440000
2023-07-17 21:54:00,391 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 821 ms to try 440000 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 49 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.8665511265164645 to a new imbalance of 0.010808255868914448. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.8909090909090909); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:54:00,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-17 21:54:00,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv147810032=2, srv1704530258=4, srv1992799895=6, srv1730167649=5, srv107611452=1, srv1600166136=3, srv101027334=0, srv207873359=7, srv855865983=8, srv893361465=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:54:00,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:54:00,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:54:00,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:54:00,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:54:00,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:54:00,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:54:00,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:54:00,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:54:00,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:54:00,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:54:00,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=56, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:54:00,392 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:54:00,392 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.8665511265164645, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=448000
2023-07-17 21:54:01,233 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 841 ms to try 448000 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 50 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.8665511265164645 to a new imbalance of 0.010831889081455806. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.8928571428571429); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:54:01,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-17 21:54:01,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1287478653=3, srv103839588=0, srv1272250955=2, srv1555230430=4, srv879994498=9, srv1691415973=5, srv1948850354=6, srv2066758779=7, srv44687428=8, srv1172657515=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:54:01,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:54:01,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:54:01,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:54:01,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:54:01,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:54:01,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:54:01,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:54:01,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:54:01,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:54:01,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:54:01,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=16, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:54:01,234 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:54:01,235 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.8665511265164645, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=128000
2023-07-17 21:54:01,434 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 200 ms to try 128000 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 14 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.8665511265164645 to a new imbalance of 0.01061525129982669. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.875); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:54:01,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-17 21:54:01,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1429016384=1, srv2124978666=4, srv340975646=5, srv1407753868=0, srv473719695=6, srv1913880666=3, srv1766145385=2, srv947877105=9, srv530734507=8, srv482873110=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:54:01,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:54:01,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:54:01,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:54:01,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:54:01,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:54:01,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:54:01,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:54:01,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:54:01,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:54:01,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:54:01,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=8, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:54:01,435 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.3064913174100617 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.3536909802912112); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:54:01,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-17 21:54:01,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv228586873=4, srv1377842536=0, srv750916097=8, srv35054281=5, srv1941517212=3, srv1393237776=1, srv1826739880=2, srv599932262=6, srv750895672=7, srv823871200=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:54:01,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:54:01,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:54:01,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:54:01,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:54:01,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:54:01,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:54:01,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:54:01,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:54:01,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:54:01,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:54:01,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=9, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:54:01,435 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.34662045060658575 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.39999999999999997); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:54:01,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-17 21:54:01,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv356391166=6, srv1036442285=0, srv918258416=8, srv291209628=5, srv1393819334=2, srv106808942=1, srv991897487=9, srv1776747290=3, srv452162227=7, srv237898989=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:54:01,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:54:01,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:54:01,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:54:01,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:54:01,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:54:01,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:54:01,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:54:01,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:54:01,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:54:01,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:54:01,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=10, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:54:01,436 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.3851338340073176 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.44444444444444453); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:54:01,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-17 21:54:01,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1593017443=0, srv1915672631=2, srv2040065652=5, srv1999728805=4, srv360886819=7, srv966974602=9, srv2147039244=6, srv45732030=8, srv1642439158=1, srv1968517146=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:54:01,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:54:01,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:54:01,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:54:01,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:54:01,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:54:01,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:54:01,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:54:01,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:54:01,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:54:01,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:54:01,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=123, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:54:01,438 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.8002334382626535 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.923469387755102); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:54:01,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-17 21:54:01,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1035967961=0, srv905870432=9, srv598398607=6, srv889757576=8, srv2094364835=5, srv1726427238=3, srv1045565651=1, srv682432308=7, srv1877482566=4, srv106785061=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:54:01,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:54:01,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:54:01,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:54:01,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:54:01,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:54:01,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:54:01,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:54:01,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:54:01,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:54:01,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:54:01,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=155, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:54:01,439 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.8131812243798632 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.9384111329343621); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:54:01,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-17 21:54:01,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2010240102=6, srv1811839915=4, srv1213026301=1, srv1985881721=5, srv1235224296=2, srv296723603=7, srv1534005784=3, srv1116171574=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:54:01,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:54:01,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:54:01,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:54:01,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:54:01,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:54:01,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:54:01,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:54:01,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:54:01,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=14, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:54:01,441 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.05755254949858986 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0664156421213727); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:54:01,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-17 21:54:01,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv944245530=7, srv275113552=6, srv1411851423=3, srv245251411=5, srv1378577549=1, srv1454439386=4, srv1293841033=0, srv1384606319=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:54:01,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:54:01,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:54:01,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:54:01,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:54:01,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:54:01,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:54:01,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:54:01,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:54:01,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=14, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:54:01,442 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.06673965003400768 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.07701755613924488); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:54:01,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-17 21:54:01,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1322513252=1, srv1486494735=2, srv118656322=0, srv607938169=7, srv505005738=6, srv1707273568=3, srv2093583029=4, srv341937587=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:54:01,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:54:01,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:54:01,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:54:01,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:54:01,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:54:01,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:54:01,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:54:01,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:54:01,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=130, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:54:01,446 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.28093705674099306 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.32420136347910594); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:54:01,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-17 21:54:01,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1127805779=0, srv1819682972=1, srv1954303943=2, srv347627065=3, srv498661217=4, srv849953899=6, srv51109394=5, srv867724203=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:54:01,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:54:01,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:54:01,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:54:01,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:54:01,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:54:01,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:54:01,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:54:01,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:54:01,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=140, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:54:01,453 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.07533492111851356 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.08693649897076465); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:54:01,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-17 21:54:01,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1805017267=3, srv111056767=1, srv1093944296=0, srv1612051087=2, srv363118982=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:54:01,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:54:01,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:54:01,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:54:01,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:54:01,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:54:01,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=5, number of hosts=5, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:54:01,454 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.25); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:54:01,454 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.21663778162911612, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.25); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=80000
2023-07-17 21:54:01,567 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 113 ms to try 80000 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 4 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.21663778162911612 to a new imbalance of 0.0024263431542461008. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.2); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:54:01,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-17 21:54:01,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv703394223=330, srv279018548=244, srv453576313=273, srv1008314325=3, srv1681802096=134, srv278276231=242, srv1228061047=42, srv137517041=67, srv1763948180=156, srv1966436533=197, srv419693291=267, srv710833271=333, srv2085640145=221, srv759977074=346, srv604907161=307, srv114131153=23, srv2047515616=212, srv1833324407=175, srv1224159442=40, srv655730780=320, srv704365443=331, srv116712066=31, srv878309309=366, srv115948072=29, srv228242279=232, srv965295801=386, srv1808274329=166, srv793826114=352, srv871767137=365, srv2093766687=223, srv662711026=323, srv1486136465=88, srv578860132=298, srv1956108607=193, srv551741002=293, srv532970433=286, srv1849849250=181, srv1871590326=186, srv447036751=270, srv1830780980=174, srv2074936108=218, srv515230071=280, srv638043851=315, srv1962011030=195, srv1255366726=45, srv37233195=256, srv269695191=240, srv46495240=276, srv2115601817=227, srv1650970068=126, srv528165867=285, srv855462418=362, srv1608807716=112, srv1200464489=36, srv1700825376=141, srv1344551869=60, srv1511542814=93, srv788979127=351, srv1990342963=200, srv1604771193=111, srv257370006=238, srv599388191=305, srv971400093=389, srv1415956765=75, srv811477355=353, srv887957532=368, srv1182168944=34, srv661190073=321, srv231220881=234, srv1490587332=89, srv1770994118=159, srv835258199=360, srv1804658742=164, srv437728757=269, srv553007940=294, srv1159095910=28, srv520090462=282, srv894847858=372, srv1614718859=113, srv38180199=259, srv928217979=381, srv728447475=337, srv990691094=392, srv276244041=241, srv1044640736=11, srv913883858=376, srv1991381386=201, srv1190932119=35, srv636086360=314, srv1754349165=154, srv411133797=266, srv460126827=275, srv735696554=342, srv1548675643=104, srv1722112403=149, srv1799687704=163, srv1112356403=18, srv1840892001=179, srv521594779=284, srv1112173037=17, srv199185766=202, srv329545619=249, srv1506003921=91, srv621397528=311, srv1705854238=144, srv1627309492=116, srv1931551878=191, srv2017388687=208, srv68508196=328, srv375480262=257, srv1348998456=62, srv1806602747=165, srv1976513813=199, srv1563390029=108, srv1089003172=14, srv1282878739=52, srv380020885=258, srv1959332244=194, srv714335673=334, srv1871238764=185, srv72945110=339, srv303626160=247, srv815982097=356, srv718143562=335, srv888215728=369, srv550484432=292, srv1260265733=48, srv1645168102=124, srv1496407265=90, srv867868442=364, srv1836513553=176, srv737001463=343, srv954176439=384, srv1512534341=94, srv1355068507=64, srv1820645205=170, srv210707265=225, srv147442429=85, srv54754918=290, srv5942343=302, srv153906560=101, srv1154143277=25, srv1154934037=26, srv1722107006=148, srv1810288802=168, srv394668543=260, srv639623193=316, srv92230599=378, srv925744727=379, srv1092886180=15, srv1534867208=100, srv760243418=347, srv595033979=303, srv1257714162=47, srv1754659652=155, srv340285843=252, srv1121887735=19, srv2043950908=211, srv621386221=310, srv1316613431=56, srv2077527153=219, srv1266912267=50, srv1205206529=38, srv404090060=263, srv488179204=279, srv653477902=319, srv333283110=250, srv58051866=299, srv2005997458=207, srv1124894598=21, srv1766806370=158, srv1547272967=103, srv225667472=231, srv2126743969=229, srv350542706=254, srv1992866977=204, srv908653640=375, srv1810104610=167, srv409608413=264, srv729653114=340, srv738964397=344, srv1726725742=151, srv2088075274=222, srv240437308=237, srv1256785219=46, srv1658008992=127, srv199229039=203, srv396729435=261, srv1962770800=196, srv821835794=357, srv1226820828=41, srv1000592466=0, srv467644403=277, srv670080950=326, srv1513382308=96, srv1852310942=182, srv950925298=383, srv515503779=281, srv781709370=350, srv1736141171=152, srv1357744395=65, srv1204092520=37, srv979917366=391, srv1285040666=53, srv1375184744=68, srv1817477120=169, srv1407443381=74, srv260396699=239, srv2120715873=228, srv814988121=355, srv1353254082=63, srv1484545301=86, srv1630011997=119, srv590572326=301, srv76778423=348, srv348028368=253, srv1682964492=135, srv776000079=349, srv1279886674=51, srv1398715279=73, srv1435141988=77, srv1878205865=187, srv2083017583=220, srv661493273=322, srv1972167693=198, srv236528612=235, srv813976970=354, srv681033568=327, srv1669332995=129, srv1776214405=160, srv2065706292=213, srv881705960=367, srv1440009313=79, srv584397438=300, srv1533511266=99, srv1031144956=8, srv520720981=283, srv1485650265=87, srv708586552=332, srv1332688601=58, srv2134076375=230, srv1778729915=161, srv1039706970=9, srv184026173=178, srv1221385844=39, srv1007698959=2, srv1311770827=55, srv1004635673=1, srv2022399876=209, srv1696951940=139, srv284040125=245, srv1140833477=22, srv1181130026=33, srv1617290848=114, srv1719094324=147, srv449243462=272, srv1462957519=84, srv1554439003=106, srv1683605851=136, srv1723012088=150, srv1109438288=16, srv733389071=341, srv1635572852=122, srv469331389=278, srv827225876=359, srv1714199972=146, srv163136701=120, srv409823924=265, srv926654052=380, srv1166117524=30, srv292354202=246, srv40321315=262, srv699053060=329, srv1703527443=143, srv1754143669=153, srv1670065398=130, srv1635471880=121, srv1300893979=54, srv1863107819=184, srv1998175229=206, srv534767250=287, srv895705588=373, srv6215178=312, srv1156733279=27, srv1326932223=57, srv1909088922=190, srv97848310=390, srv1506503824=92, srv1857500462=183, srv231135346=233, srv1886470882=188, srv1678470363=131, srv1697203095=140, srv1572036204=109, srv1245271438=44, srv889543223=370, srv64578003=317, srv535769434=288, srv750810437=345, srv1701712512=142, srv852708435=361, srv1266267952=49, srv1559178885=107, srv66848767=325, srv966572381=387, srv2024626020=210, srv459935059=274, srv367268240=255, srv1018955482=6, srv618065320=309, srv1375197789=69, srv1011822187=4, srv2071191607=216, srv179948381=162, srv1837916473=177, srv123701919=43, srv145325807=81, srv1396606940=72, srv1692059372=138, srv1150990469=24, srv1176293436=32, srv1680466385=133, srv1456208833=82, srv906616922=374, srv1544155927=102, srv193832438=192, srv893195705=371, srv164392001=123, srv824893472=358, srv1996216555=205, srv449046804=271, srv616652415=308, srv86527544=363, srv1436638248=78, srv944396738=382, srv1901793587=189, srv1658227471=128, srv1065939459=13, srv1764463766=157, srv60451321=306, srv1122612564=20, srv1456291007=83, srv1063691202=12, srv152571027=97, srv596941053=304, srv1016204244=5, srv238327940=236, srv1628761628=117, srv133930550=59, srv1448997633=80, srv421723099=268, srv723693083=336, srv336967761=251, srv1019398333=7, srv151307319=95, srv104224200=10, srv571957902=297, srv182087024=171, srv1842071267=180, srv167928153=132, srv279001974=243, srv955507257=385, srv2065803177=214, srv549043378=291, srv554409513=295, srv1625334962=115, srv1531127146=98, srv64744616=318, srv1821928020=172, srv729196954=338, srv1393578847=71, srv1706476757=145, srv1372695360=66, srv1827543591=173, srv1583903852=110, srv571659564=296, srv53663566=289, srv624461474=313, srv1687657930=137, srv1646420782=125, srv134480066=61, srv2111690237=226, srv663340853=324, srv1551708104=105, srv97057224=388, srv2070226976=215, srv2100156270=224, srv1416194065=76, srv1628967131=118, srv2073864988=217, srv1387086587=70, srv32340384=248, srv920737369=377} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-17 21:54:01,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-17 21:54:01,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-17 21:54:01,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-17 21:54:01,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-17 21:54:01,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-17 21:54:01,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-17 21:54:01,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-17 21:54:01,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-17 21:54:01,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-17 21:54:01,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-17 21:54:01,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-17 21:54:01,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-17 21:54:01,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-17 21:54:01,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-17 21:54:01,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-17 21:54:01,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-17 21:54:01,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-17 21:54:01,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-17 21:54:01,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-17 21:54:01,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-17 21:54:01,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-17 21:54:01,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-17 21:54:01,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-17 21:54:01,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-17 21:54:01,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-17 21:54:01,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-17 21:54:01,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-17 21:54:01,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-17 21:54:01,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-17 21:54:01,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-17 21:54:01,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-17 21:54:01,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-17 21:54:01,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-17 21:54:01,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-17 21:54:01,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-17 21:54:01,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-17 21:54:01,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-17 21:54:01,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-17 21:54:01,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-17 21:54:01,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-17 21:54:01,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-17 21:54:01,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-17 21:54:01,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-17 21:54:01,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-17 21:54:01,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-17 21:54:01,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-17 21:54:01,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-17 21:54:01,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-17 21:54:01,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-17 21:54:01,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-17 21:54:01,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-17 21:54:01,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-17 21:54:01,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-17 21:54:01,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-17 21:54:01,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-17 21:54:01,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-17 21:54:01,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-17 21:54:01,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-17 21:54:01,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-17 21:54:01,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-17 21:54:01,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-17 21:54:01,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-17 21:54:01,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-17 21:54:01,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-17 21:54:01,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-17 21:54:01,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-17 21:54:01,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-17 21:54:01,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-17 21:54:01,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-17 21:54:01,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-17 21:54:01,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-17 21:54:01,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-17 21:54:01,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-17 21:54:01,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-17 21:54:01,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-17 21:54:01,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-17 21:54:01,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-17 21:54:01,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-17 21:54:01,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-17 21:54:01,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-17 21:54:01,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-17 21:54:01,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-17 21:54:01,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-17 21:54:01,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-17 21:54:01,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-17 21:54:01,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-17 21:54:01,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-17 21:54:01,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-17 21:54:01,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-17 21:54:01,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-17 21:54:01,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-17 21:54:01,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-17 21:54:01,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-17 21:54:01,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-17 21:54:01,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-17 21:54:01,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-17 21:54:01,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-17 21:54:01,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-17 21:54:01,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-17 21:54:01,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-17 21:54:01,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-17 21:54:01,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-17 21:54:01,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-17 21:54:01,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-17 21:54:01,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-17 21:54:01,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-17 21:54:01,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-17 21:54:01,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-17 21:54:01,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-17 21:54:01,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-17 21:54:01,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-17 21:54:01,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-17 21:54:01,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-17 21:54:01,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-17 21:54:01,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-17 21:54:01,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-17 21:54:01,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-17 21:54:01,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-17 21:54:01,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-17 21:54:01,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-17 21:54:01,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-17 21:54:01,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-17 21:54:01,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-17 21:54:01,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-17 21:54:01,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-17 21:54:01,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-17 21:54:01,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-17 21:54:01,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-17 21:54:01,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-17 21:54:01,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-17 21:54:01,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-17 21:54:01,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-17 21:54:01,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-17 21:54:01,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-17 21:54:01,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-17 21:54:01,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-17 21:54:01,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-17 21:54:01,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-17 21:54:01,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-17 21:54:01,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-17 21:54:01,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-17 21:54:01,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-17 21:54:01,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-17 21:54:01,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-17 21:54:01,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-17 21:54:01,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-17 21:54:01,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-17 21:54:01,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-17 21:54:01,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-17 21:54:01,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-17 21:54:01,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-17 21:54:01,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-17 21:54:01,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-17 21:54:01,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-17 21:54:01,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-17 21:54:01,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-17 21:54:01,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-17 21:54:01,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-17 21:54:01,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-17 21:54:01,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-17 21:54:01,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-17 21:54:01,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-17 21:54:01,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-17 21:54:01,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-17 21:54:01,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-17 21:54:01,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-17 21:54:01,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-17 21:54:01,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-17 21:54:01,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-17 21:54:01,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-17 21:54:01,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-17 21:54:01,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-17 21:54:01,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-17 21:54:01,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-17 21:54:01,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-17 21:54:01,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-17 21:54:01,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-17 21:54:01,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-17 21:54:01,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-17 21:54:01,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-17 21:54:01,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-17 21:54:01,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-17 21:54:01,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-17 21:54:01,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-17 21:54:01,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-17 21:54:01,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-17 21:54:01,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-17 21:54:01,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-17 21:54:01,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-17 21:54:01,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-17 21:54:01,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-17 21:54:01,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-17 21:54:01,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-17 21:54:01,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-17 21:54:01,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-17 21:54:01,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-17 21:54:01,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-17 21:54:01,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-17 21:54:01,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-17 21:54:01,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-17 21:54:01,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-17 21:54:01,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-17 21:54:01,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-17 21:54:01,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-17 21:54:01,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-17 21:54:01,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-17 21:54:01,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-17 21:54:01,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-17 21:54:01,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-17 21:54:01,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-17 21:54:01,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-17 21:54:01,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-17 21:54:01,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-17 21:54:01,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-17 21:54:01,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-17 21:54:01,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-17 21:54:01,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-17 21:54:01,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-17 21:54:01,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-17 21:54:01,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-17 21:54:01,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-17 21:54:01,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-17 21:54:01,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-17 21:54:01,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-17 21:54:01,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-17 21:54:01,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-17 21:54:01,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-17 21:54:01,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-17 21:54:01,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-17 21:54:01,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-17 21:54:01,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-17 21:54:01,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-17 21:54:01,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-17 21:54:01,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-17 21:54:01,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-17 21:54:01,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-17 21:54:01,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-17 21:54:01,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-17 21:54:01,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-17 21:54:01,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-17 21:54:01,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-17 21:54:01,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-17 21:54:01,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-17 21:54:01,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-17 21:54:01,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-17 21:54:01,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-17 21:54:01,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-17 21:54:01,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-17 21:54:01,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-17 21:54:01,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-17 21:54:01,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-17 21:54:01,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-17 21:54:01,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-17 21:54:01,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-17 21:54:01,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-17 21:54:01,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-17 21:54:01,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-17 21:54:01,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-17 21:54:01,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-17 21:54:01,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-17 21:54:01,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-17 21:54:01,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-17 21:54:01,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-17 21:54:01,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-17 21:54:01,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-17 21:54:01,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-17 21:54:01,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-17 21:54:01,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-17 21:54:01,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-17 21:54:01,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-17 21:54:01,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-17 21:54:01,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-17 21:54:01,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-17 21:54:01,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-17 21:54:01,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-17 21:54:01,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-17 21:54:01,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-17 21:54:01,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-17 21:54:01,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-17 21:54:01,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-17 21:54:01,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-17 21:54:01,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-17 21:54:01,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-17 21:54:01,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-17 21:54:01,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-17 21:54:01,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-17 21:54:01,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-17 21:54:01,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-17 21:54:01,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-17 21:54:01,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-17 21:54:01,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-17 21:54:01,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-17 21:54:01,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-17 21:54:01,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-17 21:54:01,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-17 21:54:01,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-17 21:54:01,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-17 21:54:01,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-17 21:54:01,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-17 21:54:01,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-17 21:54:01,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-17 21:54:01,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-17 21:54:01,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-17 21:54:01,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-17 21:54:01,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-17 21:54:01,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-17 21:54:01,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-17 21:54:01,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-17 21:54:01,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-17 21:54:01,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-17 21:54:01,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-17 21:54:01,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-17 21:54:01,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-17 21:54:01,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-17 21:54:01,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-17 21:54:01,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-17 21:54:01,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-17 21:54:01,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-17 21:54:01,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-17 21:54:01,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-17 21:54:01,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-17 21:54:01,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-17 21:54:01,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-17 21:54:01,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-17 21:54:01,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-17 21:54:01,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-17 21:54:01,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-17 21:54:01,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-17 21:54:01,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-17 21:54:01,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-17 21:54:01,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-17 21:54:01,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-17 21:54:01,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-17 21:54:01,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-17 21:54:01,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-17 21:54:01,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-17 21:54:01,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-17 21:54:01,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-17 21:54:01,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-17 21:54:01,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-17 21:54:01,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-17 21:54:01,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-17 21:54:01,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-17 21:54:01,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-17 21:54:01,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-17 21:54:01,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-17 21:54:01,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-17 21:54:01,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-17 21:54:01,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-17 21:54:01,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-17 21:54:01,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-17 21:54:01,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-17 21:54:01,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-17 21:54:01,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-17 21:54:01,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-17 21:54:01,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-17 21:54:01,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-17 21:54:01,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-17 21:54:01,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-17 21:54:01,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-17 21:54:01,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-17 21:54:01,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-17 21:54:01,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-17 21:54:01,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-17 21:54:01,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-17 21:54:01,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-17 21:54:01,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-17 21:54:01,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-17 21:54:01,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-17 21:54:01,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-17 21:54:01,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-17 21:54:01,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-17 21:54:01,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-17 21:54:01,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-17 21:54:01,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-17 21:54:01,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-17 21:54:01,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-17 21:54:01,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-17 21:54:01,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-17 21:54:01,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-17 21:54:01,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-17 21:54:01,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-17 21:54:01,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-17 21:54:01,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-17 21:54:01,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-17 21:54:01,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-17 21:54:01,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-17 21:54:01,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-17 21:54:01,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-17 21:54:01,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-17 21:54:01,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-17 21:54:01,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-17 21:54:01,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-17 21:54:01,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=56, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-17 21:54:01,606 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.9999999999999984); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:54:01,606 WARN  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(497): calculatedMaxSteps:17606400 for loadbalancer's stochastic walk is larger than maxSteps:1000000. Hence load balancing may not work well. Setting parameter "hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.runMaxSteps" to true can overcome this issue.(This config change does not require service restart)
2023-07-17 21:54:01,606 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.866551126516463, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.9999999999999984); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=1000000
2023-07-17 21:54:08,535 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 6930 ms to try 1000000 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 55 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.866551126516463 to a new imbalance of 0.011915077989601387. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.9821428571428571); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-17 21:54:08,562 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1082): slop=0.0, systemTablesOnMaster=false
2023-07-17 21:54:08,562 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(253): Loaded config; maxSteps=1000000, runMaxSteps=false, stepsPerRegion=800, maxRunningTime=30000, isByTable=false, CostFunctions=[RegionCountSkewCostFunction, PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction, MoveCostFunction, RackLocalityCostFunction, TableSkewCostFunction, RegionReplicaHostCostFunction, RegionReplicaRackCostFunction, ReadRequestCostFunction, WriteRequestCostFunction, MemStoreSizeCostFunction, StoreFileCostFunction] , sum of multiplier of cost functions = 577.0 etc.
2023-07-17 21:54:08,571 INFO  [Time-limited test] hbase.ResourceChecker(175): after: master.balancer.TestBalancerDecision#testBalancerDecisions Thread=13 (was 12)
Potentially hanging thread: Time-limited test.slowlog.append-pool-0
	sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
	java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:175)
	java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2039)
	com.lmax.disruptor.BlockingWaitStrategy.waitFor(BlockingWaitStrategy.java:47)
	com.lmax.disruptor.ProcessingSequenceBarrier.waitFor(ProcessingSequenceBarrier.java:56)
	com.lmax.disruptor.BatchEventProcessor.processEvents(BatchEventProcessor.java:159)
	com.lmax.disruptor.BatchEventProcessor.run(BatchEventProcessor.java:125)
	java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:750)
 - Thread LEAK? -, OpenFileDescriptor=263 (was 263), MaxFileDescriptor=60000 (was 60000), SystemLoadAverage=252 (was 294), ProcessCount=173 (was 173), AvailableMemoryMB=6428 (was 7729)